Ecologia mediterranea 1999-25(2)
Ecologia mediterranea 1999-25(2)
Ecologia mediterranea 1999-25(2)
Create successful ePaper yourself
Turn your PDF publications into a flip-book with our unique Google optimized e-Paper software.
ecologia<br />
<strong>mediterranea</strong><br />
Revue Internationale d'Ecologie Méditerranéenne<br />
International Journal ofMediterranean Ecology<br />
TOME <strong>25</strong> - fascicule 2 - <strong>1999</strong><br />
188N : 0153-8756
REDACTEURSIEDITORS<br />
Laurence AFFRE<br />
Frédéric MEDAIL<br />
Philip ROCHE<br />
Thierry TATONI<br />
Eric VIDAL<br />
ARONSON 1., CEFE CNRS, Montpellier<br />
BARBERO M., IMEP, Univ. Aix-Marseille III<br />
FONDATEUR 1FOUNDER<br />
Prof. Pierre QUEZEL<br />
COORDINATRICE 1COORDINATOR<br />
COMITE DE LECTURE 1ADVISORY BOARD<br />
BROCK M., Univ. of New England, Armidale, Australie<br />
CHEYLAN M., EPHE, Montpellier<br />
DEBUSSCHE M., CEFE CNRS, Montpellier<br />
FADY B., INRA, Avignon<br />
GOODFRIEND G. A., Carnegie Inst. Washington, USA<br />
GRILLAS P., Station Biologique Tour du Valat, Arles<br />
GUIOT J., IMEP, CNRS, Marseille<br />
HOBBS R. J., CSIRO, Midland, Australie<br />
KREITER S., ENSA-M INRA, Montpellier<br />
Sophie GACHET-BOUDEMAGHE<br />
TRESORIER 1TREASURER<br />
Jacques-Louis de BEAULIEU<br />
LE FLOC'H E., CEFE CNRS, Montpellier<br />
MARGARIS N. S., Univ. of the Aegan, Mytilène, Grèce<br />
OVALLE c., CSI Quilamapu, INIA, Chili<br />
PEDROTTI F., Univ. degli Studi, Camerino, Italie<br />
PLEGUEZUELOS J. M., Univ. de Grenade, Espagne<br />
PONEL P., IMEP, CNRS, Marseille<br />
PRODON R., Labo. Arago, Univ. P. M. Curie, Paris VI<br />
RICHARDSON D. M., Univ.Cape Town, Afrique du Sud<br />
SANS F. X., Univ. de Barcelone, Espagne<br />
SHMIDA A., Hebrew Univ. of Jerusalem, Israël<br />
URBINATI c., Agripolis, Legnaro, Italie<br />
ecologia <strong>mediterranea</strong><br />
Faculté des Sciences et Techniques de Saint JérÔme<br />
Institut Méditerranéen d'Ecologie et de Paléoécologie, case 461<br />
13397 MARSEILLE Cedex 20 FRANCE<br />
Tél. : + 33 4 91 28 89 76 - Fax: + 33 4 91 28 8051<br />
E-mail: ecologia.<strong>mediterranea</strong>@botmed.u-3mrs.fr<br />
URL: http://www.ecologia.fst.u-3mrs.fr<br />
Abonnements / Subscription<br />
Un an =deux numéros / one year = Iwo issues:<br />
France: 400 F + 60 F de frais de port<br />
Europe: 400 F + 80 F de frais de port<br />
Amérique, Afrique, Asie: 400 F + 120 F de frais de port<br />
Tous les fascicules de la revue sont disponibles. Pour les commander et pour tout renseignement, nous contacter à<br />
l'adresse ci-dessus. Ali issues are avai/ab/e. To order or 10 obtain intiJrmation, p/ease contact the address above.
ecologia <strong>mediterranea</strong> <strong>25</strong> (2),135-146 (<strong>1999</strong>)<br />
Caracterizacion de los pinares de Pinus ha/epensis Mill. en el sur<br />
de la Peninsula Iberica<br />
Caracterisation des pinedes de Pinus halepensis Mill. du sud de la Peninsule Iberique<br />
Characterisation of Pinus halepensis Mill. pine forests in southern Iberian Peninsula<br />
Juan Antonio TORRES*, Antonio GARCIA-FUENTES*, Carlos SALAZAR*, Eusebio CANO*<br />
& Francisco VALLE**<br />
* Dpto, BioI. Animal, Vegetal y <strong>Ecologia</strong>, Fac. C. Experimentales. Universidad de Jaen. E-2307l Jaen-Espafia. Fax: + (34) (953)<br />
212141; jatorres@ujaen.es<br />
** Dpto Biologia Vegetal (Botanica). Fac. de Ciencias. Universidad de Granada, E-1800l Granada, Espafia<br />
RESUMEN<br />
Estudiamos las comunidades naturales de Pinus halepensis en el sur de Espafia (Andalucia). Se recopila toda la informaci6n<br />
bibliografica disponible que aporta datos de interes sobre su espontaneidad en toda la cuenca <strong>mediterranea</strong>, con especial<br />
referencia a la Peninsula Iberica. Ponemos de manifiesto el caracter edafoxer6filo de este tipo de formaciones en el area de<br />
estudio con la descripci6n de una nueva asociaci6n y una comunidad vegetal : Junipero phoeniceae-Pinetum halepensis y<br />
comunidad de Ephedrafragilis y Pinus halepensis.<br />
Palabras c1ave : Pinus halepensis, pinares aut6ctonos, caracter edafoxer6filo, sur de Espafia<br />
RESUME<br />
Cette etude porte sur les communautes naturelles de Pinus halepensis du sud de l'Espagne (Andalusia). Toute I'information<br />
bibliographique concernant la spontaneite dans le bassin Mediterraneen, particulierement celle de la Peninsule Iberique, est<br />
compilee. Le caractere edapho-xerophile de ce type de formations dans I'aire d'etude est mis en evidence, et une nouvelle<br />
association est decrite : Junipero phoeniceaePinetum halepensis, ainsi qu'une communaute 11 Ephedra fragilis et Pinus<br />
halepensis.<br />
Mots-c1es : Pinus halepensis, pinMes autochtones, caractere edapho-xerophile, sud de l'Espagne<br />
ABSTRACT<br />
A study on the natural communities of Pinus halepensis in southern Spain (Andalusia) is carried out. A compilation of the<br />
bibliographic information that contributes interesting data on their spontaneity in the Mediterranean basin is previously made,<br />
pointing out those references where the Iberian Peninsula is treated.<br />
We emphasize the edaphoxerophilous character of this vegetation type in the study area, and we provide the description of a new<br />
phytosociological association (Junipero phoeniceae-Pinetum halepensis) and a new plant community (community of Ephedra<br />
fragilis and Pinus halepensis)<br />
Key-words: Pinus halepensis, native pine forests, edaphoxerophilous character, southern Spain<br />
135
Tones et a!.<br />
ABRIDGED ENGLISH VERSION<br />
A study on the natural communities of Pinus halepensis<br />
in the south of Spain (Andalusia) has been carried out. The<br />
bibliographic information with data of interest about its<br />
spontaneity in the whole Mediterranean basin (specially in<br />
the Iberian peninsula) has been compiled. The edaphoxerophilous<br />
character of this pine-woods in the study area has<br />
been pointed out, having described a new phytosociological<br />
association and a plant community: Junipero phaenieeae<br />
Pinetum halepensis and community of Ephedra jragilis and<br />
Pinus halepensis.<br />
The spontaneous formations of Pinus halepensis in the<br />
Iberian peninsula develop on basic substrata, specially in the<br />
<strong>mediterranea</strong>n coastal provinces (Catalufia, Comunidad Valenciana,<br />
Murcia and Baleares), reaching interior zones of<br />
the Baetic ranges, Iberian System, Ebro valley and eastern<br />
Pirenees. They mainly appear under Mediterraneanpluviestational-oceanic,<br />
Mediterranean-xeric-oceanic and<br />
Mediterranean-pluviestational-continental bioclimates,<br />
ranging between thermo<strong>mediterranea</strong>n and meso<strong>mediterranea</strong>n<br />
thennotypes and from semi-arid to sub-humid ombrotypes,<br />
sharing the areas occupied by shrub communities of<br />
holly-oaks (Quereus caceirera L.), lentiscs (Pistaeia lentiscus<br />
L.) or savines (Juniperus phoenicea L.) depending on<br />
the substrata nature.<br />
The iberian pine-woods of P. halepensis, take the case<br />
of the iberic southeastern have been scarcely studied, though<br />
they are one of the most characteristic elements in the plant<br />
landscape. In spite of the physiognomic importance and their<br />
widespread area, a large number of authors question the climacic<br />
role of these woods in the Mediterranean region, even<br />
stating that P. halepensis does not grow spontaneously in the<br />
Western Mediterranean. Though there are several bibliographic<br />
references in which a secondary and anthropic character<br />
is assigned to this pine in woods and scrubs, it has<br />
never been regarded as the main species in such communities.<br />
INTRODUCCION<br />
Pinus halepensis Mill. es un arbol generalmente<br />
retorcido, de unos 12-14 m de altura media,<br />
normalmente aparasolado, aunque puede llegar hasta<br />
los 22-24 m en las mejores situaciones ecol6gicas.<br />
Presenta una distribuci6n basicameitte circun<br />
mediteminea, formando bandas cercanas a la costa<br />
donde no suele superar los 700-800 m de altitud, a<br />
excepci6n de ciertas zonas de Africa del Norte donde<br />
puede llegar hasta los 2000 m (Quezel, 1977, 1980).<br />
Desde el punto de vista taxon6mico se trata de una<br />
especie ecol6gica y geneticamente muy pr6xima a<br />
Pinus brutia Ten. (Biger & Liphschitz, 1991) con el<br />
que forma un grupo bien definido (grupo Halepenses).<br />
Ampliamente extendido por todo el Mediterraneo<br />
occidental, es sustituido hacia el oeste por su<br />
vicariante Pinus brutia (Figura I). Aunque raramente<br />
suelen coexistir ambas especies (Akman et aI, 1978),<br />
en el caso de hacerlo, como ocurre en algunos distritos<br />
136<br />
Caracterizach5n de las pinares en el sur de la peninsula iberica<br />
There are only a few botanists that have pointed out the<br />
natural and authoctonous character of P. Iwlepensis in some<br />
territories, either co-dominating with trees and shrubs or<br />
dominating the community by itself.<br />
In our study, bearing in mind the results of fossil and<br />
subfossil registers of the last 15.000 years and the analysis<br />
and taxonomic identification of charcoals. we show interesting<br />
data about the spontaneous character of P. halepensis<br />
in the Baetic area (southern peninsula) where it takes part of<br />
edaphoxerophilous communities confined to the most thermic<br />
and dry zones (sunny exposures) due to the lithological,<br />
geomorphological and climatological territorial factors. The<br />
widespread calcareous-dolomitic emergences allow the existence<br />
of a sheer landscape with big rocky blocks where the<br />
permeability of the substrata reduces the effects of the real<br />
precipitations in the territory. Furthermore, the karstification<br />
processes, break and crush the rocks causing hiperxeric environments<br />
very suitable for the establishing of P. halepensis<br />
pine-woods.<br />
These pine-woods can also take place on marls (even<br />
with a high content of gypsum) in extremely degradated<br />
soils that accentuate the ombroclimatic xericity.This fact is<br />
quite common in places with rains shades where the precipitations<br />
coming from the Atlantic ocean are very reduced<br />
because of the existence of high mountain boundaries.<br />
Thus, P. halepensis (as other conifers) constitutes natural<br />
formations in southern Iberian peninsula, specially in the<br />
thermo<strong>mediterranea</strong>n and meso<strong>mediterranea</strong>n belts, and at a<br />
lesser extent in the inferior supra<strong>mediterranea</strong>n. In some<br />
cases, a semi-arid territory rich in Neogenous-Quaternarian<br />
deposits (marls, calcareous marls and conglomerates) with a<br />
scarce water retention is optimum for the development of P.<br />
halepensis. In the other hand, a rough geomorphology of<br />
calcareous-dolomitic ranges may be the determining factor<br />
for the establishing of these pine-woods, in this case under a<br />
wider range of ombrotypes (semi-arid, dry and sub-humid).<br />
de Grecia, en el sureste de Anatolia y en el Lfbano,<br />
suelen formar hfbridos naturales (Panetsos, 1975). Las<br />
poblaciones apartadas de Pinus halepensis en Asia<br />
Menor y Cercano Oriente, al limite este de la Cuenca<br />
Mediterranea, plantea curiosas cuestiones a cerca del<br />
modelo de distribuci6n en el pasado y las rutas<br />
migratorias (Barbero et ai, 1998).<br />
En la Peninsula Iberica, las formaciones<br />
espontaneas de Pinus halepensis aparecen sobre<br />
sustratos basicos, principalmente en las provincias del<br />
litoral mediterraneo (Cataluna, Comunidad<br />
Valenciana, Murcia y Baleares), penetrando hacia el<br />
interior en las sierras Beticas, Sistema Iberico, Valle<br />
del Ebro y Pirineos orientales. Se distribuye<br />
mayoritariamente en los bioclimas Mediterraneo<br />
pluviestacional-oceanico, Mediterraneo xerico<br />
oceanico y Mediterraneo pluviestacional-continental<br />
con ciertas penetraciones en el Templado oceanico<br />
submediterraneo (Rivas-Martinez, I 996a, 1996b).<br />
Puesto que el factor determinante para su distribuci6n<br />
ecologia <strong>mediterranea</strong> <strong>25</strong> (2) - /999
Torres et al.<br />
parece ser la temperatura, especialmente las minimas<br />
invernales (Falusi et al., 1984), ocupan tan solo los<br />
termotipos termomeditemineo y mesomeditemineo<br />
con ombrotipos que oscilan entre el semiarido y el<br />
subhumedo, donde convive sobre todo con coscojares<br />
(Quercus coccifera L.), lentiscares (Pistacia lentiscus<br />
L.) y sabinares de sabina mora (luniperus phoenicea<br />
L.), dependiendo de la naturaleza del sustrato.<br />
Consideraciones sobre el canicter climacico de<br />
Pinus halepensis<br />
Los pinares ibericos de pino carrasco, y<br />
concretamente los del sudeste iberico, han sido objeto<br />
de escasos estudios botanicos a pesar de tratarse de<br />
uno de los elementos mas caracteristicos del paisaje<br />
vegetal de esta parte de la Peninsula Iberica.<br />
En este sentido cabe mencionar las referencias que<br />
algunos botanicos clasicos hacen de dichos pinares;<br />
asi, Huguet del Villar (1916, 19<strong>25</strong>) pone de manifiesto<br />
el caracter natural y aut6ctono de Pinus halepensis en<br />
algunos territorios en los que aparece, donde formaria<br />
conclimax con la encina (Quercus ilex). Cuatrecasas<br />
(1929) en su trabajo sobre Sierra Magina hace<br />
referencia al caracter climacico de estos pinares en las<br />
vertientes inferiores mas calidas y secas de todo el<br />
Macizo. Font Quer (1933) en sus observaciones<br />
botanicas sobre la vegetaci6n de Los Monegros<br />
constata el papel subalterno de Quercus coccifera en<br />
Caracterizacion de los pinares en el sur de la peninsula iberica<br />
su Pinetum halepensis. Laza Palacios (1946) en sus<br />
estudios sobre la flora y vegetaci6n de las Sierras<br />
Tejeda y Almijara describe un Pinetum halepensis para<br />
los pisos semiarido y templado de la clasificaci6n<br />
fitogeografica de Emberger donde, sin entrar a valorar<br />
la potencialidad climacica del pino de Alepo, considera<br />
de gran vitalidad el estado actual del pino carrasco.<br />
Rivas Goday (1951) al abordar el estudio de la<br />
vegetaci6n y flora de la provincia de Granada pone de<br />
manifiesto la espontaneidad de Pinus halepensis sobre<br />
dolomias. Braun-Blanquet et Bolos (1958) en sus<br />
estudios del Valle del Ebro al describir la asociaci6n<br />
Rhamno-Quercetum cocciferae esgrimen dentro de la<br />
faciaci6n tipica una variante con Pinus halepensis, en<br />
ombroclima semiarido, que catalogan como una<br />
comunidad particular donde Quercus coccifera subsiste<br />
bajo la copa de pinares de Pinus halepensis. Fernandez<br />
Casas (1972) en su estudio fitografico sobre la Cuenca<br />
del Guadiana Menor vuelve a resaltar su naturalidad<br />
sobre sustratos margosos y ombrotipo semiarido. Por<br />
ultimo, Costa (1987) al describir la vegetaci6n del Pais<br />
Valenciano insiste en considerar las formaciones de P.<br />
halepensis como naturales, aunque con un caracter<br />
secundario (nunca ocupan una posici6n climacica) y<br />
procedentes de la degradaci6n de carrascales.<br />
Mas recientemente, Arrojo (1994) pone de<br />
manifiesto el caracter natural de estos pinares en la<br />
Sierra de Castril (Granada).<br />
Figura I. Distribuci6n de Pinus halepensis en la Cuenca Mediteminea (modificado de Barbero et al., 1998)<br />
Figure 1. Pinus ha1epensis distribution in the Mediterranean basin (modified from Barbero et aI., 1998)<br />
ecologia <strong>mediterranea</strong> <strong>25</strong> (2) - <strong>1999</strong> 137
Torres et al.<br />
4< ... .._<br />
Caracterizaci6n de los pinares en el sur de la peninsula iberica<br />
Figura 2. Area de estudio. Localizaci6n biogeogriifica; Provincia Betica, I : Sector Subbetico, la distrito Subbetico-Maginense, lb<br />
distrito Cazorlense, lc distrito Alcaracense, Id distrito Subbetico-Murciano; 2: Sector Guadiciano-Bacense, 2a distrito Guadiciano-Bastetano,<br />
2b distrito Serrano-Bacense, 2c distrito Serrano-Mariense, 2d distrito Serrano-Estaciense.<br />
Figure 2. Study area. Biogeographical location: Baetic province, I. Sub-Baetic sector: Ia Sub-Baetic-Maginense district. I b Cazorlellse<br />
district. le Alcaracense district, Id Sub-Baetic-Murciano district. 2. Guadiciano-Bacense sector: 2a Guadiciano<br />
Bastetallo district, 2b Serrano-Bacense district, 2c Serrano-Mariense district, 2d Serrano-Estaciense district.<br />
De igual forma, Torres et al. (1994) en sus<br />
estudios sobre los pinares de Pinus halepensis en el<br />
sector Subbetico consideran el canicter autoctono de<br />
estas formaciones, criterio igualmente compartido por<br />
Navarro Reyes (1995, 1997) en las sierras de Baza y<br />
Las Estancias (Granada).<br />
De igual forma, diversos autores en otros paises<br />
del cntorno meditemineo destacan el caracter<br />
espontaneo de esta especie y su papel en el dinamismo<br />
de la vegetacion (Emberger, 1939 ; Tregubov, 1963 ;<br />
LoiseL 1971; Ozenda, 1975; Tomaselli, 1977;<br />
AchhaL 1986; Quezel , 1986; Quezel et al., 1987;<br />
Qubel et al., 1988; Fennane, 1988; Quezel &<br />
Barbero, 1992; Quezel et al., 1992; Barbero et al.,<br />
1998).<br />
Pese a su importancia fisionomica y a su amplia<br />
distribucion, muchos autores discuten el papel<br />
climacico de estos bosques en la region Mediterranea,<br />
llegando incluso a afirmar que no crece<br />
espontaneamente en el Mediterraneo occidental.<br />
Existen muchas referencias concretas de esta especie<br />
138<br />
que le asignan siempre un papel secundario y antropico<br />
en diversas comunidades climacicas boscosas, 0 incluso<br />
de matorrales, pero en ningun caso se reconoce el papel<br />
prioritario que pueda tomar el pino carrasco en las<br />
mismas. Asf, Bolos (1962) considera la presencia de<br />
Pinus halepensis como un accidente en las<br />
comunidades vegetales en que aparece. Folch (1981)<br />
destaca el caracter secundario y antropico del pino<br />
carrasco y al igual que el anterior autor alude a la falta<br />
de especies vegetales caracterfsticas. Bolos (1987) en<br />
sus estudios sobre la vegetacion de Catalufia y la<br />
Depresion del Ebro plantea el problema de la<br />
participacion de Pinus halepensis en la estructura y<br />
dinamismo de la vegetacion propia del dominio del<br />
Rhamno-Quercetum cocciferae Braun-Blanquet &<br />
Bolos 1954, donde 10 considera frecuente en la<br />
maquia climacica, aunque normalmente con una baja<br />
densidad. Ferreras et a!' (1987) reinciden en su<br />
caracter secundario debido a la accion del hombre y<br />
los consideran como etapa serial de otras formaciones<br />
mas densas y sombrfas. Nuet et a!' (1991) vuelven a<br />
ecologia <strong>mediterranea</strong> <strong>25</strong> (2) - <strong>1999</strong>
Torres et al.<br />
referir la falta de un cortejo floristico propio y por<br />
tanto no llegan a considerlos coma una comunidad<br />
vegetal. Sanchez-Gomez et Alcaraz (1993) consideran<br />
al pino carrasco coma especie integrante de la<br />
vegetacion permanente de roquedos calizos y que<br />
puede actuar coma primocolonizador de suelos<br />
degradados.<br />
Par otro lado las investigaciones paleobotanicas<br />
tambien contribuyen, a traves de los registros fosiles 0<br />
subfosiles, sobre todo los de los ultimos 15.000 afios,<br />
a evidenciar el caracter natural y autoctono de Pinus<br />
halepensis. En este sentido, los espectros polfnicos<br />
(Parra, 1983; Stika, 1988; Yll, 1988; Rivera &<br />
Obon, 1991; Lopez, 1991, 1992) Y sobre todo los<br />
analisis de maderas carbonizadas con sus precisiones<br />
taxonomicas e identificacion al nivel especffico<br />
(Vernet et al., 1983, 1987; Ros, 1988, 1992;<br />
Bernabeu & Badal, 1990, 1992; Rodriguez Ariza et<br />
al., 1991 ; Rodriguez Ariza, 1992 ; Rodriguez Ariza &<br />
Vernet, 1992; Grau, 1993; Dupre, 1988; Hopf,<br />
1991 ; Badal, 1991, 1995 ; Badal et al, 1994) apartan<br />
datos interesantes sobre la presencia ancestral de pino<br />
carrasco en la Peninsula Iberica. Las zonas de Levante<br />
son las que presentan mayor numero de datos,<br />
observandose la continuidad de pinG carrasco desde el<br />
Peniglaciar (Gil Sanchez et aI., 1996).<br />
Parece, pues, justificado considerar a Pinus<br />
halepensis, al igual que otras especies de coniferas,<br />
coma una especie autoctona ampliamente distribuida<br />
por el mediterraneo Occidental, y con caracter<br />
permanente 0 edafoxerofilo en aquellos espacios<br />
ecologicos donde determinados factores limitantes<br />
(edaficos, litologicos, geomarfologicos y climaticos)<br />
impiden su colonizacion par la vegetacion esclerofila<br />
potencial. En nuestra 0pllllOn muchas de las<br />
afirmaciones que discuten el caracter espontaneo de<br />
estos pinares se deben a la gran adaptabilidad<br />
ecologica de esta especie para difundirse a expensas<br />
de los bosques esclerofilos.<br />
Los pinares de Pinus halepensis en el sur de la<br />
Peninsula Iberica : area de estudio<br />
En el presente trabajo, se estudian las formaciones<br />
de Pinus halepensis en las zonas Beticas del sur<br />
peninsular. BiogeogrMicamente, la zona de estudio se<br />
extiende par los sectores Subbetico y Guadiciano<br />
Bacense de la provincia carologica Betica, localizados<br />
ecologia <strong>mediterranea</strong> <strong>25</strong> (2) - <strong>1999</strong><br />
Caracterizacion de los pinares en el sur de la peninsula ibhica<br />
en la zona centro-nororiental de Andalucia (Espafia)<br />
(Figura 2).<br />
Desde el punto de vista geologico es posible<br />
diferenciar dos grandes unidades tectonicas muy<br />
relacionadas con las tipologias de pinares que<br />
presentamos en este trabajo: par un lado, las Zonas<br />
Externas de las Cordilleras Beticas (Prebetico y<br />
Subbetico), de gran extension en el territorio y<br />
eminente caracter montafioso, con alturas en algunos<br />
casos superiores a los 2000 m, donde la litologfa<br />
responde basicamente a farmaciones calizo<br />
dolomfticas, en muchos casos incluso kakiritizadas,<br />
que proporcionan un relieve muy particular de aspecto<br />
ruiniforme, donde la potencia caliza-dolomia es muy<br />
variable, llegando incluso en algunos zonas a<br />
desaparecer completamente las caliza en favor de las<br />
dolomia, coma es el caso de la Sierras de Castril<br />
(Granada) y Cazorla-Segura y Las Villas (Jaen).<br />
Aunque los afloramientos rocosos ocupan una gran<br />
extension, los suelos que aparecen son de tipo litosol,<br />
ya que se trata de zonas con fuertes pendientes que<br />
han sufrido intensos procesos de erosion.<br />
Por otro lado, la unidad Neogeno-Cuaternaria esta<br />
representada por la Depresion del Guadiana Menor en<br />
la que abundan materiales sedimentarios; aparecen<br />
margas, margo-calizas y margas yesfferas, con<br />
afloramiento en las cotas mas altas de los materiales<br />
mas deleznables que permiten una rapida<br />
evapotranspiracion del agua y por tanto una alta<br />
xericidad edafica. Los suelos que se desarrollan son de<br />
tipo cambisoles calcicos y regosoles calcareos, con<br />
pendientes que oscilan entre el 10 Y el 20% con una<br />
topografia generalmente colinada.<br />
MATERIAL Y METODOS<br />
Los datos geologicos los hemos obtenido a partir<br />
de la cartograffa del Instituto Geologico y Minero de<br />
Espafia, hojas de Villacarrillo (Virgili & Fonbote,<br />
1987), Jaen (Garcfa Duefias & Fonbote, 1986), Baza<br />
(Vera & Fonbote, 1982) y Granada-Malaga (Aldaya et<br />
aI., 1980). Para el estudio de suelos hemos seguido a<br />
Aguilar et al. (1987) y Perez Pujalte & Prieto<br />
Fernandez (1980). La identificacion de bioclimas y<br />
pisos bioclimaticos se basan en Rivas-Martinez<br />
(I996a, 1996b). Para la distribucion biogeogrMica<br />
seguimos a Rivas-Martfnez et al. (1997). Las series de<br />
vegetacion han sido determinadas basandonos en la<br />
obra de Rivas-Martfnez (1987) y para el muestreo de<br />
139
Torres et al.<br />
las comunidades, hemos utilizado el metodo<br />
fitosociol6gico de la Escuela de Zurich-Montpellier<br />
(Braun-Blanquet, 1979). En la nomenclatura de los<br />
sintaxones se contemplan las normas del C6digo de<br />
Nomenclatura Fitosociol6gica (Barkman et aI., 1986),<br />
mientras que para la denominaci6n y autoria de los<br />
taxones utilizamos las siguientes obras: Flora Iberica<br />
(Castroviejo et al., 1986-1998) y Flora Europea (Tutin<br />
et al., 1964-1980), a excepci6n de Genista cinerea<br />
subsp. speciosa Rivas Goday et T. Losa ex Rivas<br />
Martinez, T.E. Diaz, F. Prieto, Loidi et Penas in Los<br />
Picos de Europa: 268. 1984; Leucanthemopsis<br />
spathulifolia (Gay) Rivas-Martinez, Asensi, Molero<br />
Mesa et Valle in Rivasgodaya 6: 42. 1991.<br />
RESULTADOS<br />
Las comunidades espontaneas de Pinus halepensis<br />
en la zona de estudio constituyen formaciones<br />
edafoxer6filas, limitadas por la litologia,<br />
geomorfologia y climatologia del territorio alas<br />
vertientes mas termicas y xer6filas del territorio,<br />
normalmente coincidentes con las exposiciones mas<br />
soleadas. Los abundantes afloramientos calizo<br />
dolomiticos definen un paisaje de escarpes, dolinas,<br />
lapiaces y grandes bloques rocosos, donde la gran<br />
permeabilidad de este tipo de sustratos, amortigua las<br />
precipitaciones reales del territorio. Si a su vez<br />
sumamos los procesos de karstificaci6n que<br />
fragmentan y trituran la roca madre, se generan<br />
medios hiperxericos optimos para el asentamiento de<br />
pinares de Pinus halepensis. De igual manera, los<br />
sustratos margosos, a veces con alto contenido en<br />
yesos y suelos extremadamente degradados, suelen<br />
acentuar la xericidad ombroclimatica y soportan<br />
masas de Pinus halepensis, normalmente en zonas de<br />
sombra de lluvias, donde las precipitaciones<br />
procedentes del Atlantico se yen muy mermadas por<br />
los macizos montafiosos del territorio.<br />
En estos territorios hemos reconocido dos<br />
formaciones vegetales de gran importancia ecologica<br />
que describimos como nuevas para la ciencia, donde el<br />
pino de halepo 0 carrasco (Pinus halepensis) adquiere un<br />
caracter relevante en la comunidad.<br />
Junipero phoeniceae-Pinetum halepensis ass. nova<br />
(Holotypus inv 13, Tabla 1)<br />
Constituyen pinares abiertos de Pinus halepensis,<br />
de baja cobertura, normalmente aparasolados, donde<br />
140<br />
Caracterizaci6n de los pinares en el sur de la peninsula iberica<br />
son frecuentes otras gimnospermas como Juniperus<br />
oxycedrus L. y Juniperus phoenicea L. Destaca la<br />
presencia de Rhamnus myrtifolius Willk. y Rhamnus<br />
lycioides L., ambos taxones bien adaptados a los<br />
suelos esqueleticos carbonatados y que soportan una<br />
gran desecacion del suelo.<br />
La composici6n floristica del matorral<br />
acompafiante, poco diversificada, es rica en<br />
endemismos beticos que dan matiz corologico a esta<br />
asociacion; entre ellos destacan Echinospartum<br />
boissieri (Spach) Rothm., Thymus orospedanus<br />
Huguet del Villar, Genista cinerea subsp. speciosa y<br />
Ptilostemon hispanicus (Lam.) Greuter, junto a una<br />
cohorte de elementos propios de dolomias como son<br />
Centaurea granatensis Boiss., Convolvulus boissieri<br />
Steudel, Centaurea boissieri DC. subsp. willkommii<br />
(Schultz Bip. ex Willk.) Dostal, PterocephaIus<br />
spathulatus (Lag.) Coulter, Fumana paradoxa<br />
(Heywood) J. Giiemes, Scorzonera albicans Cosson y<br />
Leucanthemopsis spathulifolia (Tabla 1).<br />
La comunidad se extiende por el termotipo<br />
mesomediterraneo del sector Subbetico, con<br />
irradiaciones en el sector Guadiciano-Bacense,<br />
alcanzando los 1400 m de altitud en algunas laderas<br />
soleadas del Macizo de Magina y Sierra de Castril. Su<br />
6ptimo aparece bajo ombroclima seco-subhumedo e<br />
inviernos templados.<br />
Se desarrolla en crestones y laderas abruptas sobre<br />
sustratos calcareos, calizas y calizo-dolomias, con<br />
suelos poco evolucionados de tipo litosol, donde<br />
adquiere caracter de comunidad permanente. La alta<br />
xericidad del sustrato y las elevadas temperaturas del<br />
periodo estival no permiten la entrada de la serie<br />
potencial de todo el territorio, correspondiente a los<br />
encinares del Paeonio coriaceae-Querceto<br />
rotundifoliae sigmetum, con la que contacta<br />
catenalmente hacia los suelos mas desarrollados.<br />
Desde el punto de vista sintaxon6mico guarda<br />
relacion con diversas comunidades paraclimacicas<br />
donde la sabina mora (Juniperus phoenicea), especie<br />
extremadamente austera y de marcado caracter<br />
rupfcola, esta representada de forma constante (Tabla<br />
3). La ausencia de Pinus halepensis en los sabinares<br />
del Rhamno lycioidis-Juniperetum phoeniceae Rivas<br />
Martinez et G. L6pez in G. L6pez 1976, pone de<br />
manifiesto el claro caracter continental de esta<br />
asociacion, cuyo optimo se alcanza en los termotipos<br />
meso- y supramediterraneo de la provincia Castellano-<br />
ecologia <strong>mediterranea</strong> <strong>25</strong> (2) - <strong>1999</strong>
Torres et al.<br />
Orientaei6n<br />
Pendiente (%)<br />
Altitud ( 1= 10m)<br />
Area (I = 10m")<br />
Cobertura (%)<br />
Altura media (m)<br />
N° de orden<br />
NE<br />
5<br />
90<br />
40<br />
40<br />
4<br />
I<br />
Caracterfsticas de asociacion y unidades superiores<br />
Juniperus phoenicea I I 3 I<br />
Pinus halepensis 2 2 3 3<br />
Juniperus oxycedrus I + 2<br />
Rhamnus myrtifolius + + +<br />
Rhamnus lycioides + + +<br />
Pistacia terebinthus + +<br />
Phillyrea angustif()lia +<br />
Daphne gnidium<br />
Teuaium fruticans + +<br />
Buxus sempervirens<br />
Compafieras<br />
Rosmarinus ofjicinalis + + +<br />
Echinospartum boissieri I I<br />
Bupleurumfruticosum +<br />
Thymus zygis subsp. gracilis + + +<br />
Thymus orospedanus<br />
Teuaium capitatum +<br />
Phlomis purpurea + +<br />
Phagnalon saxatile + +<br />
Cistus albidus + + +<br />
Brachypodium retusum + + 1<br />
Vrginea maritima + +<br />
Genista cinerea subsp. speciosa + +<br />
Sedum sediforme + +<br />
Stipa tenacissima +<br />
Lavandula latifolia<br />
Ptilostemon hispanicum +<br />
Thymus mastichina<br />
Helianthemum crocewn +<br />
Bupleurum spinosum<br />
Festuca scariosa<br />
Helianthemum cinereum subsp. ruhellum<br />
Vlex parvijlorus<br />
Centaurea granatensis<br />
Convolvulus hoissieri<br />
Centaurea boissieri subsp. willkommii<br />
Pterocephalus spathulatus<br />
Fumana paradoxa<br />
Scorzonera alhicans<br />
Leucanthemopsis spathulifolia<br />
Helianthemum frigidulum<br />
Caracteriwcion de los pinares en el sur de la peninsula ibhica<br />
E E E E E SE S S SE SE SW S SE E<br />
90 35 <strong>25</strong> 10 <strong>25</strong> 15 70 40 30 30 30 <strong>25</strong> 40 30<br />
110 115 115 120 100 110 135 1<strong>25</strong> 11570 110 127 1<strong>25</strong> 130<br />
30 40 40 40 40 40 10 10 30 10 10 10 40 40<br />
40 70 60 60 40 60 40 40 60 65 65 60 40 50<br />
3 3 5 345 3 464 5 5 4 5<br />
2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 1I 12 13 14 15<br />
I<br />
3<br />
3<br />
+<br />
+<br />
+<br />
+<br />
+<br />
2<br />
+<br />
+<br />
+<br />
+<br />
+<br />
+<br />
132 I 2<br />
3 2 123<br />
I + +<br />
I +<br />
+ +<br />
+<br />
+<br />
+<br />
+<br />
2<br />
+ + + +<br />
I + 2<br />
+<br />
+<br />
+<br />
+<br />
+<br />
+<br />
+ +<br />
+ +<br />
+ + +<br />
+<br />
+<br />
+ I<br />
1<br />
2<br />
1<br />
+<br />
+<br />
2 2 I<br />
333<br />
I 1 +<br />
I<br />
I +<br />
I<br />
+<br />
2 2 2<br />
I<br />
+<br />
+<br />
+ +<br />
+<br />
2 2<br />
2 3<br />
+<br />
+<br />
+<br />
+<br />
+<br />
2<br />
+<br />
+ +<br />
+ +<br />
+ +<br />
+ +<br />
I<br />
+<br />
+.<br />
+<br />
+<br />
+ +<br />
+<br />
+<br />
Ademas : Santo!ina canescens + en 3 ; Asphodelus alhus +, Arbutus unedo + en 4; Phlomis lychnitis + en 5; Prunus .lpinoS{l + en<br />
6 ; Aphyllantes monspeliensis + en 8' Cistus elusii I, Helianthemum cinereum + en 9; Sedum dasyphyllum I y Lactuca<br />
tenerrima + en 10; Polygala rupestris +, Asperula hirsuta + y Glohularia spinosa + en I1 ; Genista scorpius 2, Paronychia<br />
suffruticosa + en 12 ; Silene legionensis + en 13; Fumana ericoides + en 14 ; Teucrium pseudochamaepitys + en 15.<br />
Loealidades: 1,2,3,4 y 5 Cerea Castillo Otinar (Jaen); 6 Barraneo El Lobo (Sierra de Jaen, Jaen); 7 Barraneo Los Cortijuelos<br />
(Jaen); 8 Barraneo La Canada (Carehelejo, Jaen); 9 Cabra de Sto. Cristo (Jaen); 10 Cerro Cuello de Ventarique (Carehelejo,<br />
Jaen); II Arroyo Los Miradores (Los Villares, Jaen); 12 Castril-Pozo Alc6n (Granada); 13 Sierra de Castril (Granada); 14 y 15<br />
Sierra de la Cruz (Sierra de Magina, Jaen).<br />
Tabla I. Junipero phoenieeae-Pinetum halepensis ass. nova<br />
Tahle 1. Junipero phoeniceae-Pinetwn halepensis ass. nova<br />
ecologia <strong>mediterranea</strong> <strong>25</strong> (2) - <strong>1999</strong> 141<br />
+
Torres et al. Caracterizaci6n de los pinares en el sur de la peninsula iberica<br />
Orientaei6n N W E N N N NE SE SWNW<br />
Pendiente (%) 15 10 20 10 40 10 10 30 35 35<br />
Altitud (l = IOm) 60 70 60 40 48 50 52 67 70 85<br />
Area (1= 10m 2 ) 40 40 40 40 40 40 40 10 10 10<br />
Cobertura (%) 40 35 40 60 40 50 50 60 65 65<br />
Altura media (m) 5 6 4 6 5 5 5 5 5 6<br />
N° de Orden I 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10<br />
Caracteristicas de comunidad y unidades superiores<br />
Pinus halepensis 2 2 2 3 2 2 2 3 3 3<br />
Ephedrafragilis I 2 2 I 2 I 1<br />
Juniperus oxvcedrus 2 + 3 1 1 1 2 1<br />
Rhamnus lycioides + 2 I I 1 I 1<br />
Olea sylvestris + + + + I<br />
Juniperus plwenicea 1<br />
Rhamnus alatemus +<br />
Phillyrea angustifolia +<br />
Asparagus acutifolius + + +<br />
Compafieras<br />
Rosmarinus officinalis + + 2<br />
Phlomis purpurea<br />
Chronanthus biflorus + + 1<br />
Vlex parvijZorus + 1 + + + + 1<br />
Cistus albidus 1 I + + 1 1<br />
Thymus gracilis + + + 2<br />
Brachypodiulll retusum + + + 1 I<br />
Stipa tenacissima + 2 + + + 2 +<br />
Cistus clusii + 1<br />
Dactylis hispanica +<br />
Ademas: Echinospartum boissieri y Unum suffruticosum + en 1 ; Daphne gnidium +, Phagnalon saxatile +, Sthaehelina dubia +<br />
en 2; Phillvrea latifolia, Lonicera hispanica + en 3 ; Bupleurumfruticescens + en 10.<br />
Loealidades : I Cortijo de Herrera (Pegalajar, Jaen) ; 2 Cerea Castillo de Otifiar (Jaen) ;3 Finea de Otifiar (Jaen) ; 4 Puente Nuevo<br />
(Pegalajar, Jaen) ; 5,6 y 7 Cerro del Prior (Pegalajar, Jaen) ; 8 Cerea de Guadahortuna (Granada) ; 9 Cabra de Sto. Cristo (Jaen) ;<br />
10 Pefi6n de Alhamedilla (Granada).<br />
Maestrazgo-Manchega (sectores Manchego y<br />
Maestracense), aunque en algunos enclaves<br />
supramediternineos de este ultimo sector y del sector<br />
Celtiberico-Alcarrefio llega a enriquecerse en especies<br />
montanas como Juniperus communis L.<br />
hemisphaerica (K. Presl) Nyman y Pinus nigra<br />
Arnold subsp. saizmannii (Dunal) Franco. En las<br />
sierras Beticas sus relaciones se establecen tanto con<br />
el Rhamno myrtifoiii-Juniperetum phoeniceae Molera<br />
Mesa et Perez Raya 1987 de distribuci6n Malacitano<br />
Almijarense y Rondense occidental (Perez Raya et aI.,<br />
1990), como con el Junipero phoeniceae-Pinetum<br />
saizmannii Valle, Mota et G6mez-Mercado 1988 de<br />
areal Subbetico, Guadiciano-Bacense y Malacitano<br />
Almijarense (Valle et ai, 1989). En ambos casos las<br />
diferencias florfsticas de nuestra comunidad con ellas<br />
son muy significativas a nivel de las comunidades<br />
seriales y en el estrato arb6reo las diferentes especies<br />
142<br />
Tabla 2. Comunidad de Ephedrafragilis y Pinus halepensis<br />
Table 2. Ephedra fragilis-Pinus halepensis community<br />
del genera Pinus matizan los distintos sintaxones<br />
(Tabla 3). En la tabla 1, presentamos distintos<br />
inventarios de esta comunidad, donde recogemos una<br />
variante mas humeda por la presencia de Buxus<br />
sempervirens L., localizado en topograffas menos<br />
accidentadas, y mayor humedad ambiental.<br />
Recientemente, Perez Latorre et a!. (1998)<br />
describen la asociaci6n Pino haiepensis-Juniperetum<br />
phoeniceae Perez Latorre et Cabezudo 1998 para<br />
caracterizar los pinares-sabinares edafoxer6filos<br />
dolomfticos termomediterraneos que sustituirfan al<br />
Chamaeropo-Juniperetum phoeniceae Rivas-Martinez<br />
in Alcaraz, T.E. Dfaz, Rivas-Martfnez & Sanchez<br />
G6mez 1989 en el sector Rondefio, aunque sin aportar<br />
diferencias eco16gicas y florfsticas con respecto a este<br />
ultimo. Por nuestra parte consideramos que deben de<br />
sinonimizarse prevaleciendo la asociaci6n de mayor<br />
antigiledad, en este caso Chamaeropo-Juniperetum<br />
ecologia <strong>mediterranea</strong> <strong>25</strong> (2) - <strong>1999</strong>
Torres et al.<br />
phoeniceae (art. <strong>25</strong>, C.P.N.), donde ya en su tipo<br />
nomenclatural (Rivas-Martinez ex Alcaraz in Cant6,<br />
Laorga & Belmonte, inv. 3, tabla 34, Opusc. Bot.<br />
Pharm. Complutensis, 3: 65, 1986) Pinus halepensis<br />
participa en la comunidad.<br />
En todo caso presenta marcadas diferencias con<br />
nuestra comunidad, sobre todo por la ausencia de<br />
especies de clam caracter term6filo y de 6ptimo<br />
termomediterraneo como Ceratonia siliqua L.,<br />
Rhamnus lycioides L. subsp. velutinus (Boiss.)<br />
Nyman, Chamaerops humilis L., Aristolochia baetica<br />
L.<br />
Comunidad de Ephedra fragilis y Pinus halepensis<br />
(Tabla 2)<br />
Constituyen tambien formaciones abiertas de<br />
Pinus halepensis de porte mas moderado que en el<br />
caso anterior que ocupan sustratos blandos,<br />
principalmente margas, margas yesiferas y<br />
conglomerados con escasa capacidad de retenci6n de<br />
agua. En su composici6n floristica es frecuente la<br />
presencia de Ephedra fragilis Desf., Juniperus<br />
oxycedrus y Rhamnus lycioides, a veces acompafiados<br />
de Olea europaea L. var. sylvestris Brot. y en<br />
ocasiones Juniperus phoenicea.<br />
Aparece en el piso bioclimatico mesomediterraneo<br />
inferior semiarido del sector Guadiciano-Bacense<br />
(distrito Guadiciano-Bastetano), donde ocupa aquellos<br />
relieves y posiciones mas complejas, como carcavas,<br />
taludes de cierta pendiente y ramblas sometidos a<br />
elevada xericidad, con claro caracter topografico.<br />
Hacia las zonas mas favorables, con mayor<br />
compensaci6n hidrica y edafica es reemplazado por<br />
las comunidades climacicas del territorio, coscojares y<br />
lentiscares del Rhamno lycioidis-Quercion cocciferae<br />
Rivas Goday ex Rivas-Martinez 1975. Suele irradiar<br />
hacia las zonas basales de ombrotipo seco del sector<br />
Subbetico donde la continuidad de estos sustratos<br />
margosos, sumado al efecto de sombras de lluvias que<br />
producen la accidentada orografia de toda la unidad<br />
biogeografica permiten la presencia local del<br />
ombroclima semiarido.<br />
La alteraci6n que presenta el territorio por el uso<br />
del hombre a 10 largo de la historia aconseja, por<br />
ahora, su tratamiento como comunidad a la espera de<br />
estudios posteriores mas exhaustivos.<br />
ecologia <strong>mediterranea</strong> <strong>25</strong> (2) - <strong>1999</strong><br />
Caracterizacion de los pinares en el sur de la peninsula iberica<br />
CONCLUSIONES<br />
Pinus halepensis, al igual que otras coniferas,<br />
constituye formaciones naturales en todo el sur de la<br />
Peninsula Iberica, ampliamente distribuidas por los<br />
termotipos termo- y mesomediterraneo, y en menor<br />
medida en el supramediterraneo inferior.<br />
En unos casos, la presencia de ambientes<br />
semiaridos ricos en materiales de dep6sitos ne6geno<br />
cuaternarios (margas, margocalizas y conglomerados)<br />
con escasa capacidad de retenci6n de agua,<br />
constituyen medios 6ptimos para el desarrollo de<br />
Pinus halepensis. En otros, la abrupta geomorfologia<br />
del territorio, rica en sustratos calizo-domiticos de<br />
dificil edafizaci6n, actua como factor determinante en<br />
la instalaci6n de comunidades permanentes de Pinus<br />
halepensis, en este caso, con una gran amplitud<br />
ombroclimatica (semiarido-seco-subhtimedo).<br />
REFERENCIAS<br />
Achhal, A., 1986. Etude phytosociologique et<br />
dendrometrique des ecosystemes forestiers du bassin<br />
versant du N'fis (Haut Atlas central). These Doct. es.<br />
Sci. Marseille, 204 p. + Annexes.<br />
Aguilar, J. et aI., 1987. Memoria del mapa de suelos de la<br />
provincia de Jaen. Escala 1: 200.000. Departamento de<br />
Edafologia y Quimica Agrfcola. Universidad de<br />
Granada, 552 pp.<br />
Akman, Y., Barbero, M. & Quezel, P., 1978. Contribution a<br />
l'etude de la vegetation forestiere d'Anatolie<br />
mediterraneenne. Phytocoenologia 5: 1-79.<br />
Aldaya, F., Vera, J. A. & Fontbote, J. M., 1980. Mapa y<br />
Memoria explicativa de la hoja 83 (Granada-Malaga) del<br />
Mapa Geol6gico Nacional E. 1:200.000. I.G.M.E. Serv.<br />
Public. Min. 1. y Energia. Madrid.<br />
Arrojo, E., 1994. Cartograffa de la vegetaci6n presente en la<br />
Sierra de Castrfl: bases para la conservaci6n de las<br />
comunidades vegeta!es. Tesis Doctoral. Ined.<br />
Universidad de Granada, 552 pp.<br />
Badal, E., 1991. La vegetaci6n durante el paleolftico<br />
superior en el Pais Valenciano y Andalucfa. Resultados<br />
antracol6gicos. In: Arqueologia medioambiental a traves<br />
de los macrorestos vegetales. Asociaci6n cultural viva<br />
(C.S.I.e.). Aula de <strong>Ecologia</strong> del Ayuntamiento de<br />
Madrid. Madrid.<br />
Badal, E., 1995. La vegetaci6n carbonizada. Resultados<br />
antracol6gicos del Pais Valenciano. In: El Cuaternario<br />
del Pais Valenciano. Asociaci6n espanola para el<br />
estudio del Cuatemario. Departamento de Geograffa de<br />
la Universitat de Valencia. Valencia: 217-226.<br />
Badal, E., Bernabeu, J. & Vernet, J. L., 1994. Vegetation<br />
changes and human action from the Neolithic to the<br />
Bronze Age (7000-4000 BP) in Alicante, Spain, based<br />
on charcoal analysis. Veget. Hist. Archaebot. 3: 155-166.<br />
143
Torres et al.<br />
groupements preforestiers et des matorrals rifains.<br />
<strong>Ecologia</strong> Mediterranea 14 (1/2): 77-122.<br />
Quezel, P. & Barbero, M., 1992. Le pin d'Alep et les<br />
especes voisines : repartition et caracteres ecologiques<br />
generaux, sa dynamique recente en France mediterraneenne.<br />
Forer mediterraneenne 13(3): 158-170.<br />
Quezel, P.; Barbero, M., Benabid, A. & Rivas-Martfnez, S.,<br />
1992. Contribution a I' etude des groupements forestiers<br />
et preforestiers du Maroc oriental. Studia Botanica 10:<br />
57-90. Salamanca.<br />
Rivas Goday, S., 1951. Contribucion al estudio de la<br />
Vegetacion y Flora de la provincia de Granada.<br />
Excursion botanica a la Sierra de Baza y Ziijar. Anal. Re.<br />
Acad. Farmacia 7: 58-133.<br />
Rivas-Martfnez, S., 1987. Mapa de Series de Vegetacian de<br />
Espana escala 1:400.000 y Memoria. I.C.O.N.A.<br />
Madrid.<br />
Rivas-Martfnez, S., I996a. Clasificacion bioc1imatica de la<br />
Tierra. Folia Botdnica Matritensis 16 (33 pags.). Dpto.<br />
Biologfa Vegetal (Botanica). Universidad de Leon.<br />
Rivas-Martfnez, S., 1996b. Bioc1imatic map of Europa.<br />
Cartographic Service, University ofLean. Leon.<br />
Rivas-Martfnez, S., Dfaz, T.E., F. Prieto, J.A., Loidi, J. &<br />
Penas, A., 1984. Los Picos de Europa, Ediciones<br />
Leonesas, Leon. 295 pp.<br />
Rivas-Martfnez, S., Asensi, A., Molero, J. & Valle, F., 1991.<br />
Endemismos vasculares de Andalucfa. Rivasgodaya 6:<br />
5-76.<br />
Rivas-Martfnez, S., Asensi, A., Valle, F., Molero, J. & Dfez,<br />
B., 1997. Biogeographical synthesis of Andalusia<br />
(southern Spain). J. Biogeogr. 24: 915-928.<br />
Rivera, D. & Obon, e., 1991. Macrorrestos vegetales de los<br />
yacimientos de la comarca noroeste en los inicios de la<br />
Edad de los Metales. In: P. Lopez (ed.), El cambio<br />
cultural del IV al II milenios a. C en la comarea<br />
noroeste de Murcia. Vol I. e.S.I.C. Madrid: 239-246.<br />
Rodrfguez Ariza, M.O., 1992. Human-plant relationships<br />
during the Copper and Bronze Ages in the Baza and<br />
Guadix basins (Granada, Spain). Bull. Soc. bot. Fr. 139,<br />
Actual. bot. (2/3/4): 451-464.<br />
Rodrfguez Ariza, M.O & Vernet, J.L., 1991. Premiers<br />
resultats paleoecologiques de I' etablissement<br />
chalcolthique de Los Millares (Santa Fe de Mondujar,<br />
Almerfa, Espagne) d'apres l'analyse anthracologique.<br />
In: Waldren, W.H.; J.A. Ensenyal & R.e. Kennard (ed.),<br />
Iind Deya Conference of Prehistory 1-13, BAR<br />
International Series, Vol. I.<br />
Rodrfguez Ariza, M.O, Aguayo, P. & Moreno, E, 1992. The<br />
environment in the Ronda Basin (Malaga, Spain) during<br />
recent prehistory based on an anthracological study of<br />
Old Ronda. Bull. Soc. bot. Fr. 139, Actual. bot. (2/34):<br />
715-7<strong>25</strong>.<br />
Ros, M.T., 1988. L'aplicacio de I'analisi antracologica a<br />
I'arqueologia catalana. Cota Zero 4: 51-60.<br />
146<br />
Caracterizacian de los pinares en el sur de la peninsula iberica<br />
Ros, M.T., 1992. Les apports de I' anthracologie a I' etude du<br />
paleoenvironnement vegetal en Catalogne (Espagne).<br />
Bull. Soc. bot. Fr. 139, Actual. bot. (2/3/4): 483-493.<br />
Sanchez-Gomez, P. & Alcaraz, E, 1993. Flora, vegetacian y<br />
paisaje vegetal de las Sierras de Segura Orientales.<br />
Instituto de Estudios Albacetenses. Excma. Diputacion<br />
de Albacete. Albacete, 459 pp.<br />
Stika, H.P., 1988. Botanische untersuchungen in der<br />
Bronzezeitlichen Hohensiedlung Fuente Alamo.<br />
Madrider Mitteilungen, 29:21-76.<br />
Tomaselli, R., 1977. Degradacion de la maquia<br />
<strong>mediterranea</strong>. In: Quezel, P., Tomaselli, R. &<br />
Morandini, R. (eds), Bosques y maquia mediterrdneos<br />
(edicion en castellano de 1982), Ediciones del Serbal,<br />
Barcelona: 59-134.<br />
Torres, J. A., Arrojo, E., Cano, E. & Valle, E, 1994.<br />
Formaciones de Pinus halepensis en el Sector Subbetico.<br />
In : Universitat de les Illes Balears (ed.), Libro de<br />
resumenes XV Jornadas de Fitosociologfa, Palma de<br />
Mallorca: 85.<br />
Treggubov, V., 1963. Etude des groupement vegetaux du<br />
Maroc oriental mediterraneen. Bull. Mus. Hist. Nat.<br />
Marseille, 23: 121-196.<br />
Tutin, T.G. & aI., 1964-1980. Flora Europaea. Vols. 1-5.<br />
Cambridge Univ. Press.<br />
Valle, E, Gomez Mercado, E, Mota, J. & Dfaz De la<br />
Guardia, e., 1989. Parque Natural de Cazorla, Segura y<br />
las Villas. Gufa botdnico-ecolagica. Edit. Rueda,<br />
Madrid, 354 pp.<br />
Vera, J.A. & Fontbote, J. M., 1982. Mapa y Memoria<br />
explicativa de la hoja 78 (Baza) del Mapa Geologico<br />
Nacional E 1:200.000. I.G.M.E. Serv. Public. Min. I. y<br />
Energfa. Madrid.<br />
Vernet, J. L.; Badal, E. & Grau, E., 1983. La vegetation<br />
neolithique du sud-est de I'Espagne (Valencia, Alicante)<br />
d'apres I'analyse antracologique. CR. Acad. Se. Paris,<br />
296, Serie 111-48: 669-672.<br />
Vernet, J. L.; Badal, E. & Grau, E., 1987. L'environnement<br />
vegetal de l'homme au Neolithique dans le sud-est de<br />
I'Espagne (Valencia, Alicante): Premiere synthese<br />
d'apres I' analyse anthracologique. Premieres<br />
Communautes Paysannes en Mediterranee occidentale,<br />
Colloque International du CNRS, Montpellier, 1983.<br />
Paris: 131-136.<br />
Virgili, e. & Fontbote, J. M., 1987. Mapa y Memoria<br />
explicativa de la hoja 71 (Villacarillo) del Mapa<br />
Geologico Nacional E. 1:200.000. I.G.M.E. Serv. Public.<br />
Min. I. y Energfa. Madrid.<br />
Yll, El., 1988. Analisis de polen y palinograma. In: Olaria<br />
(ed.). Cova fosca. Una sentamiento mesoneolftico de<br />
cazadores y pastores en la serranfa del alto maestrazgo.<br />
Monograffes de Prehistoria Arqueologfa<br />
Castellonenques. Diputacion de Castellon. Castellon de<br />
la Plana, 424 pp.<br />
ecologia <strong>mediterranea</strong> <strong>25</strong> (2) - <strong>1999</strong>
Linhart et al. Selective herbivory ofthyme chemotypes by a mollusk and a grasshopper<br />
INTRODUCTION<br />
Many Mediterranean ecosystems are characterised<br />
by a limited availability of nutrients and water. For<br />
plants, this means that costs of leaf construction are<br />
high, and leaves must be well protected against the<br />
herbivores that are found in these challenging habitats<br />
(Ross & Sombrero, 1991). This need for protection<br />
has led to the synthesis by many Mediterranean plants<br />
of a large diversity of secondary compounds, many of<br />
which are aromatic. These plant species have charac<br />
teristic smells and tastes, which are often so specific<br />
that plants can be identified simply by these features,<br />
without recourse to other botanical characteristics<br />
such as floral features or leaf morphology. Rosemary<br />
(Rosmarinus), sage (Salvia), myrtle (Myrtus), bay<br />
(Laurus), junipers (Juniperus) and scores of other spe<br />
cies evoke specific odours and tastes. Many plants<br />
also show a significant amount of genetically-based<br />
intra-specific variability (Gleizes, 1976; Langenheim,<br />
1994). Foremost among them are species of the genus<br />
Thymus (Labiatae) which often have a diversity of<br />
smells and tastes, associated with the presence of sev<br />
eral monoterpenes (Adzet et al., 1977; Thompson, in<br />
press and refs. therein). Such intra-specific variability<br />
always elicits attention and questions about its origin<br />
and maintenance. This has been true for various Thy<br />
mus species and especially for T. vulgaris, a common<br />
component of dry garrigue-like or matorral ecosys<br />
tems of southern France and Spain. In T. vulgaris, in<br />
dividual plants are characterised by the predominance<br />
of a specific monoterpene (chemotype) in the essential<br />
oil sequestered in the epidermal glands that cover its<br />
leaves and stems. As a result, a given plant will have a<br />
characteristic odour and flavour. The six monoterpe<br />
nes present in southern France are geraniol (G), linalol<br />
(L), alpha terpineol (A), thuyanol (U), carvacrol (C)<br />
and thymol (T). Structurally, the first two are straight<br />
chains, the next two are cyclic and the last two are cy<br />
clic and phenolic. The synthesis of all six is under the<br />
control of a series of independently assorting epistatic<br />
loci. The details of its biochemistry and genetics are<br />
described in many publications (e.g. Passet, 1971;<br />
Vernet et al., 1977; Thompson et al., 1998; Linhart &<br />
Thompson, <strong>1999</strong>). Many populations of thyme contain<br />
two or more chemotypes and the association between<br />
chemotypes and various botanical and geographic<br />
features is also well described, especially in southern<br />
148<br />
France (e.g. Gouyon et al., 1986b; Thompson, in<br />
press).<br />
The question we wish to address in this study has<br />
to do with the influences of this variability upon herbivory<br />
of T. vulgaris by two of its consumer species,<br />
the grasshopper Leptophyes punctitatissimum (Tetti<br />
goniidae, Orthoptera) and the slug Deroceras reticu<br />
latum (Limacidae, Mollusca).<br />
MATERIALS AND METHODS<br />
Framework<br />
The primary issues we addressed were i) whether<br />
the two herbivores exhibited repeatable patterns of<br />
selectivity among chemotypes by feeding on some<br />
chemotypes more than on others, and ii) whether the<br />
two species fed preferentially on the same chemo<br />
types.<br />
Plant material<br />
Thyme plants offered to the herbivores were clonally<br />
produced from mother plants, with at least 10<br />
mother plants per chemotype (A, C, G, L, T, U).<br />
Artificial diets for slugs<br />
Gelatine cakes were produced following the meth<br />
ods of Whelan (1982) and Linhart and Thompson<br />
(1995), and contained measured weights of chopped<br />
thyme leaves.<br />
Feeding trials<br />
Eight grasshoppers and nine slugs were used in in<br />
dividual cages. Each animal was presented with two<br />
replicates of all six chemotypes simultaneously. This<br />
methodology, while less tidy than the often used binary<br />
choice trials involving only two items at a time,<br />
is more realistic, as it reflects more accurately the<br />
complexities of garrigue vegetation which can contain<br />
several thyme chemotypes in addition to other<br />
monoterpene-containing species such as Juniperus<br />
spp., Rosmarinus, and others. Individual plants were<br />
4-6 cm tall and had 6 leaves. Artificial diets for slugs<br />
consisted in food disks measuring 8 mm in diameter,<br />
and weighing 0.2 g. Each disk contained the leaf<br />
equivalent to about eight fresh leaves. For grasshop-<br />
ecologia <strong>mediterranea</strong> <strong>25</strong> (2) - <strong>1999</strong>
Linhart et al. Selective herbivory ofthyme chemotypes by a mollusk and a grasshopper<br />
pers, no artificial diet was available, so that this type<br />
of experiment could not be carried out.<br />
Containers for individual animals consisted of:<br />
i) circular, soil-filled glass dishes 15 cm in diameter<br />
for the mollusks, covered with damp muslin, and<br />
ii) rectangular planting trays 20x30 cm in size covered<br />
with metal mesh cages about 5 cm in height for the<br />
grasshoppers.<br />
All experiments that followed the protocols described<br />
here were carried out once. In the case of<br />
slugs, different animals were used in the two experi<br />
ments, to prevent the possibility that learning in the<br />
first trial with the living plants, might influence slug<br />
behaviour in the second experiment. Some further tri<br />
als were run, usually with fewer animals, and lasting<br />
longer periods of time. Because of these differences,<br />
they were not directly comparable to the experiments<br />
reported here, and were not analysed statistically.<br />
However, all observations germane to the results re<br />
ported here are also noted.<br />
RESULTS<br />
Deroceras<br />
The slugs ate primarily plants of the G and A che<br />
motypes, and ate little of the U, C, and T chemotypes<br />
(Table I) of the nine individuals tested, five ate mostly<br />
G, three ate more A than G and one ate mostly A and<br />
L. In subsequent tests with fewer animals, G was also<br />
the chemotype most eaten.<br />
Tests with gel cakes showed that animals ate more<br />
of G than the other chemotypes with L also selected,<br />
and C the least eaten. Once again, there were differ<br />
ences among individuals, with 4/10 individuals prefer<br />
ring G, two a combination of G and L, one feeding<br />
mostly on L, one on U, and two showing no clear<br />
preference.<br />
Leptophyes<br />
The grasshoppers ate all chemotypes, but ate most<br />
of chemotype T (Table 1). There was marked hetero<br />
geneity among individuals. In additional runs (data not<br />
shown) of 8 individuals exposed to 6 chemotypes,<br />
three showed a strong preference for T while the oth<br />
ers were less selective in their feeding.<br />
DISCUSSION<br />
Both herbivores ate a diversity of thyme chemo<br />
types but concentrated their feeding on some chemo<br />
types and were deterred by others. There was a<br />
general consensus about the most and least eaten che<br />
motypes for each species, although there was also<br />
some heterogeneity among individuals. This heteroge<br />
neity reflects phenotypic variation among individuals,<br />
observed in most studies of this type, and underscores<br />
the need to carry out such tests with adequate numbers<br />
of animals. The two species differed dramatically in<br />
their preferences, with Leptophyes feeding more on<br />
thymol (T), while Deroceras fed very little on that<br />
chemotype, eating primarily plants of geraniol (G) and<br />
terpineol (A) chemotypes.<br />
Species Chemotype P (3)<br />
Plant material G L A U C T<br />
SLUG<br />
Plants (I) 4.1±0.6 2.7±0.5 3.9±0.6 1.0±0.2 0.9±0.2 1.0±0.3
Linhart et al. Selective herbivory ofthyme chemotypes by a mollusk and a grasshopper<br />
At first contact, the primary detectable differences<br />
among thyme plants are those associated with the<br />
monoterpene contents of their glands. But there are<br />
also other, more subtle differences among them: these<br />
include for example pubescence, leaf size, thickness,<br />
toughness and disposition, and all may affect the<br />
plants' palatability to various herbivores (Strong et aI.,<br />
1984). For this reason, an artificial diet which reduces<br />
these differences among food items is an important<br />
confirmation of the specific role of terpenes in herbi<br />
vore choice. We were only able to use artificial diets<br />
using ground leaves for the slugs as no artificial diets<br />
were available for the grasshoppers.<br />
The slugs ate somewhat larger amounts of geraniol<br />
containing cakes, just as they ate more plants of the G<br />
chemotype than the others. This observation provides<br />
support for the role of the specific monoterpenes synthesised<br />
by the plants as determinants of level of her<br />
bivory. This role was further supported in other<br />
experiments which involved the snail Helix aspersa<br />
(Linhart & Thompson, 1995) goats (Capra hircus) and<br />
sheep (Ovis aries) (Linhart & Thompson, <strong>1999</strong>). In all<br />
three cases, patterns of relative preference of live<br />
plants characterised by specific chemotypes were the<br />
same as choices made when feeding on synthetic diets<br />
supplemented with pure distilled monoterpenes (Lin<br />
hart & Thompson 1995, <strong>1999</strong>).<br />
The difference in patterns of preference between<br />
slugs and grasshoppers is notable as it shows that the<br />
two animals react very differently to the smell and/or<br />
the taste of the two molecules. These interspecific dif<br />
ferences are also interesting in combination with another<br />
comparison made between patterns of herbivory<br />
by the grasshopper Omocestus viridulus, and the<br />
mollusk Deroceras reticulatum feeding upon mixtures<br />
of the graminoid Dactylis glomerata and the legume<br />
Trifolium repens. The two animals behaved very dif<br />
ferently, with the grasshopper feeding disproportion<br />
ately on the common species, with a periodic<br />
preference for the grass, while the slug fed dispropor<br />
tionately on the rarer species, with a consistent prefer<br />
ence for the legume (Cottam, 1985). Such results<br />
further document the existence of important inter<br />
specific differences in herbivore behaviour, and sug<br />
gest that the presence of multiple species of herbivores<br />
can contribute to small-scale heterogeneity of botani<br />
cal and biochemical composition within plant communities.<br />
150<br />
The patterns of herbivory shown by the slugs in<br />
our experiment differ markedly from those of Gouyon<br />
et al. (l986a) who found the animals in their experi<br />
ments showed preference patterns of A=C>T>U. We<br />
presume the differences are associated with the fact<br />
that their slugs had no experience feeding on thyme,<br />
and also were not exposed to G or L. In any case, the<br />
differences illustrate how animal origin and experi<br />
mental design can influence the outcome of a feeding<br />
trial.<br />
The inter-specific differences we saw are consis<br />
tent with other patterns of herbivory of T. vulgaris.<br />
For example Helix aspersa and the Chrysomelid beetle<br />
Arima marginata preferred the L chemotype, while<br />
sheep (Ovis aries) preferred U, while goats although<br />
less specific in their choices, clearly preferred A, L or<br />
C to the other three chemotypes either in the form of<br />
whole plants or in synthetic diets (Linhart & Thomp<br />
son, <strong>1999</strong>). Other plants that show genetically-based<br />
intra-species variability in chemical defenses have<br />
also been studied experimentally by exposing diverse<br />
chemical phenotypes to various herbivores and para<br />
sites. In the great majority of cases, the herbivores<br />
show species-specific host selection; that is, there are<br />
consistent, inter-specific differences in the chemical<br />
phenotypes they select as food or host plants. This is<br />
not surprising, as one may well expect that these dif<br />
ferences reflect the interspecific differences in physi<br />
ology, metabolism and behaviour that are to be<br />
expected among organisms as different as molluscs,<br />
insects, fungi, birds, fish and mammals. These pat<br />
terns have been observed repeatedly in many plant<br />
species as diverse as Labiatae, Leguminosae, Graminae,<br />
Fucoidae, Compositae, and various conifers<br />
(Simms, 1990; Linhart, 1991; Linhart & Thompson,<br />
<strong>1999</strong>; Iwao & Rausher, 1997; Van Der Meijden, 1996;<br />
Snyder & Linhart, 1998). The consistent nature of<br />
these observations implies that such species-specific<br />
herbivory and parasitism can contribute to the mainte<br />
nance of genetic variability in host defenses via com<br />
plex patterns of selection. The results also indicate<br />
that for a given plant species, no one molecule can be<br />
counted on as a dependable defense against diverse<br />
herbivores.<br />
Acknowledgements<br />
We thank the staff of the Centre d'Ecologie Fonc<br />
tionnelle et Evolutive (CNRS) in Montpellier, France,<br />
ecologia <strong>mediterranea</strong> <strong>25</strong> (2) - <strong>1999</strong>
Linhart et al. Selective herbivary afthyme chematypes by a mallusk and a grasshopper<br />
and especially C. Collin, D. Couvet, M. Debussche,<br />
and B. Dommee. Very useful help and advice were<br />
also provided by J. Lamy and the Chambre d'Agri<br />
culture de la Drome. Technical assistance was provided<br />
by L. Bowden, N.B. Linhart, and B. Stojanovic<br />
Meunier. Financial aid was provided by the U.S. Na<br />
tional Science Foundation, and the University of Colo<br />
rado.<br />
REFERENCES<br />
Adzet T., Granger R., Passet 1. & San Martin R., 1977. Le<br />
polymorphisme chimique dans le genre Thymus: sa signification<br />
taxonomique. Biochem. Syst. Evol., 5: 269<br />
272.<br />
Cottam O.A., 1985. Frequency-dependent grazing by slugs<br />
and grasshoppers. J. Ecol., 73: 9<strong>25</strong>-933.<br />
Gleizes M., 1976. Biologie des terpenes vegetaux: etude des<br />
composes monoterpeniques et sesquiterpeniques. Annee<br />
BioI., 15: 7-127.<br />
Gouyon P.H., Fort P. & Caraux G., 1986a. Selection of<br />
seedlings of Thymus vulgaris by grazing slugs. 1. Ecol.,<br />
71: 299-306.<br />
Gouyon P.H., Vernet P., Guillerm J.L. & Valdeyron G.,<br />
1986b. Polymorphisms and environment. The adaptive<br />
value of the oil polymorphisms in Thymus vulgaris. L.<br />
Heredity, 57: 59-66.<br />
Iwao K. & Rausher M., 1997. Evolution of plant resistance<br />
to multiple herbivores: quantifying diffuse coevolution.<br />
Am. Nat., 149: 316-335.<br />
Langenheim J.H., 1994. Higher plant terpenoids: a phytocentric<br />
view of their ecological roles. J. Chem. Ecol., 20:<br />
1223-1280.<br />
Letchamo W., Saez F. & Stahl-Biskup E., (in press). The<br />
genus Thymus.<br />
Linhart Y.B., 1991. Disease, parasitism and herbivory: multi<br />
dimensional challenger in plant evolution. Trends Ecol.<br />
Evol., 6: 392-396.<br />
Linhart Y.B. & Thompson J.O., 1995. Terpene based selective<br />
herbivory by Helix aspersa (Mollusca) on Thymus<br />
vulgaris (Labiatae). Oecologia, 102: 126-132.<br />
ecologia <strong>mediterranea</strong> <strong>25</strong> (2) - <strong>1999</strong><br />
Linhart Y.B. & Thompson J.O., <strong>1999</strong>. Thyme is of the essence:<br />
biochemical polymorphism and multi-species<br />
deterrence. Evol. Ecol. Research, 1: 151-171.<br />
Passet J., 1971. Thymus vulgaris L. : chemotaxonomie et<br />
biogenese monoterpenique. These Ooct. d'Etat. Universite<br />
de Montpellier, Montpellier.<br />
Ross J.O. & Sombrero c., 1991. Environmental control of<br />
essential oil production in Mediterranean plants. In: 1.B.<br />
Harborne & F.A. Tomas-Barberan (eds.). Ecological<br />
chemistry and biochemistry ofplant terpenoids. Clarendon,<br />
Oxford, U.K., 83-94.<br />
Simms E.L., 1990. Examining selection on the multi-variate<br />
phenotype: plant resistance to herbivores. Evolution, 44:<br />
1173-1188.<br />
Sokal R.R. & Rohlf F.J., 1981. Biometry. 2nd ed., Freeman,<br />
San Francisco, CA.<br />
Strong O.P., Lawton J.H. & Southwood T.R.E., 1984. Insects<br />
on Plants. Community Patterns and Mechanisms.<br />
Harvard Univ. Press Cambridge, MA.<br />
Thompson J.O., (in press). Population structure, and the<br />
spatial dynamics of genetic polymorphism in thyme. In:<br />
Letchamo, W, Saez, F. & Stahl-Biskup, E. (Eds.), in<br />
press: The genus Thymus.<br />
Thompson 1.0., Manicacci O. & Tarayre M., 1998. Thirty<br />
five years of thyme: a tale of two polymorphisms. Bioscience,<br />
48: 805-815.<br />
Snyder M.A. & Linhart Y.B., 1998. Subspecific selectivity<br />
by a mammalian herbivore: geographic differentiation of<br />
interactions between two taxa of Sciurus aberti and<br />
Pinus ponderosa. Evol. Ecol., 12: 755-765.<br />
Van Oer Meijden E., 1996. Plant defense, an evolutionary<br />
dilemma: contrasting effects of (specialist and generalist)<br />
herbivores and natural enemies. Ent. Exp. Appl., 80:<br />
307-310.<br />
Vernet P., Gouyon P.K. & Valdeyron G., 1977. Genetic<br />
control of the oil content in Thymus vulgaris L.: a case<br />
of polymorphism in a biosynthetic chain. Genetica, 69:<br />
227-231.<br />
Whelan R.J., 1982. An artificial medium for feeding choice<br />
experiments with slugs. J. Appl. Ecol., 19: 89-94.<br />
151
ecologia <strong>mediterranea</strong> <strong>25</strong> (2),153-161 (<strong>1999</strong>)<br />
Patterns and correlates of exotic and endemic plant taxa in the<br />
Balearic islands<br />
, 1 _<br />
Montserrat VILA & Irma MUNOZ<br />
Centre de Recerca Ecologica i Aplicacions Forestals, Universitat Autonoma de Barcelona, 08193 Bellaterra, Barcelona, Spain<br />
1<br />
Author for correspondence: Tel: 93-5811987, Fax: 93-5811312, e-mail: vila@cc.uab.es<br />
ABSTRACT<br />
We analysed the taxonomy and biogeography of endemic and exotic plants in the Balearic Islands (Spain), one of the "hot-spots"<br />
of the Mediterranean Basin. Richness, diversity and density (number of taxallog 1o area) of exotic taxa (species and subspecies) is<br />
higher than that of endemic taxa. Mallorca is the island with the highest number of endemic and exotic taxa. On average, exotic<br />
and endemic taxa are little abundant or rare and represent 8.4% and 6% of the total flora, respectively. The taxonomic distribution<br />
of both exotic and endemic species is not random: Solanaceae, Amaranthaceae, Iridaceae and Euphorbiaceae are overrepresented<br />
families within the exotic taxa. Plumbaginaceae, Labiatae and Rubiaceae are over-represented among endemics.<br />
While most exotic taxa are therophytes, chamaephytes are the dominant life-form among endemics. Exotics are mainly found in<br />
cultivated areas, in disturbed and ruderal communities, while most endemics are located in rocky habitats. Coastal communities<br />
display a great proportion of endemic taxa (35.94 %), and are little represented by exotic taxa (5.94 %). It is in this habitat where<br />
most effort should be addressed in order to preserve both endemic and non-endemic native vegetation.<br />
Key words: commonness, conservation of islands, endemism, Mallorca, Pithyusic Islands, rarity<br />
RESUME<br />
Nous avons analyse la taxonomie et la biogeographie des plantes endemiques et exotiques des lies Baleares (Espagne), l'un des<br />
"hot-spots" du bassin mediterraneen. La richesse, la diversite et la densite (nombre de taxallog lO zones) des taxa exotiques (especes<br />
et sous-especes) sont plus elevees que celles des taxa endemiques. Majorque est 1'lIe ayant le plus grand nombre de taxa endemiques<br />
et exotiques. En moyenne, les taxa exotiques et endemiques sont peu abondants ou rares, et representent<br />
respectivement 8,4% et 6% de la flore totale. La repartition taxonomique des especes exotiques et endemiques n'est pas aleatoire<br />
: les Solanaceae, Amaranthaceae, Iridaceae et Euphorbiaceae sont les families sur-representees parmi les exotiques. Les<br />
Plumbaginaceae, Labiatae et Rubiaceae sont sur-representees parmi les endemiques. Tandis que la plupart des taxa exotiques<br />
sont des therophytes, les chamaephytes constituent la forme de vie dominante parmi les endemiques. Les especes exotiques se<br />
rencontrent principalement dans les zones cultivees et les communautes perturbees et ruderales, alors que la plupart des endemiques<br />
s'observent dans les habitats rocheux. Les communautes c6tieres affichent une grande proportion de taxa endemiques<br />
(35,94 %), mais peu de taxa exotiques (5,94 %). Ce sont dans ces biotopes littoraux que la plupart des efforts devraient etre entrepris<br />
afin de preserver la vegetation indigene, endemique et non-endemique.<br />
Mots-ch\s : frequence, conservation des lies, endemisme, Majorque, lies Pithyuses, rarete<br />
153
Vilcl & Mulio::<br />
INTRODUCTION<br />
There is a great interest in understanding the proc<br />
esses that shape the ecology of endemic and intro<br />
duced species (e.g. Gaston, 1994; Drake et a!., 1989,<br />
respectively). This concern requests a strong previous<br />
knowledge of the diversity and abundance patterns of<br />
these taxa (McIntyre, 1992; Schwartz, 1993; Cowling<br />
& Samways, 1995). On the other hand, preservation<br />
of endemic species and control of introduced species<br />
are two main goals of conservation programmes<br />
world-wide that often are simultaneously carried out<br />
(Usher, 1986; Houston & Scheiner, 1995; Schieren<br />
beck, 1995). Thus research on the distribution patterns<br />
of endemics and exotics at the regional level and<br />
taxonomic, biological and ecological affinities of both<br />
groups of taxa is imperative to highlight hypothesis to<br />
be experimentally tested, and also to advance on basic<br />
knowledge for conservation practices.<br />
Islands have high levels of plant endemism. The<br />
best examples are found in big isolated islands such as<br />
Madagascar with 12.000 species 80 % of wich are en<br />
demic or New Zealand with 82 % endemic species.<br />
Endemics are also common in small islands: Canary<br />
Islands (612 endemics), Mauricio Island (280 endem<br />
ics), Madeira Islands (129 endemics) (Lean & Hin<br />
richsen, 1990). In the Mediterranean Basin, the<br />
Tyrrhenian Islands are one of the 10 "hot-spots" of<br />
species diversity and have almost 20 % of endemic<br />
plant taxa (Medail & Quezel, 1997).<br />
Endemic plant species are especially vulnerable in<br />
islands (Eliasson, 1995). For example, more than 90<br />
% of endemic plants in Sta. Elena, Ascension Island<br />
and Lord Howe island are endangered (Lean & Hin<br />
richsen, 1990). Intrinsic causes of vulnerability are<br />
related to the characteristics of insular species such as<br />
biological simplicity and reduced dispersal (Carlquist,<br />
1965; Eliasson, 1995; Cody & McCoverton 1996;<br />
Schiffman 1997). However, the main causes of such<br />
vulnerability are overexploitation, deforestation,<br />
habitat destruction, alteration of regional hydrological<br />
cycles, water pollution and species introductions.<br />
Islands are very vulnerable to biological invasions<br />
(Loope & Mueller-Dombois, 1989; Atkinson & Cam<br />
eron, 1993; McDonald & Cooper, 1995). The percent<br />
age of exotic plant species is very high in islands, i.e.<br />
Hawaii (44 %), New Zealand (40 %), British Islands<br />
(43 %), Ascension Island (83 %) (Vitousek et a!.,<br />
1997). This high fraction of exotic species may be re-<br />
154<br />
Diversity ofexotic and endemic plants in the Balearic Islands<br />
lated to higher invasibility of islands due to higher<br />
number of releases and propagules per unit area, a<br />
lack of biotic mechanisms controlling invasion, the<br />
existence of unsaturated communities, high distur<br />
bance regimes, higher susceptibility to the effects of<br />
invaders than similar mainland areas (D'Antonio &<br />
Dudley, 1995) and also to a large perimeter-area ratio<br />
than that for continents (Lonsdale, <strong>1999</strong>).<br />
The Balearic Islands have a high species diversity<br />
(Simon, 1994) and are rich in endemic taxa (G6mez<br />
Campo et a!', 1984). Endemic plants have been stud<br />
ied with regard to evolutionary origin based on cyto<br />
taxonomy analysis (Cardona & Contandriopoulos,<br />
1979; Contandriopoulos & Cardona, 1984). However,<br />
the diversity and distribution of endemic taxa has not<br />
been quantified and compared to that of the exotic<br />
component. In this study we analyse several aspects of<br />
the diversity and distribution of both the endemic and<br />
the exotic component of the Balearic flora. The ques<br />
tions are: I) Are endemic and exotic taxa similarly<br />
abundant? 2) Are there taxonomic and life-history<br />
similarities between endemic and exotic taxa? 3) In<br />
which communities are endemic and exotic taxa lo<br />
cated? The biogeographic origin of exotics is also<br />
commented. We base our study on a bibliographic<br />
survey.<br />
METHODS<br />
Area of study<br />
The Balearic Islands are the most eastern islands<br />
of the Mediterranean Basin and belong together with<br />
Corsica, Sardenia and Sicily to the Tyrrhenian Islands.<br />
They originated after the geologic drift and posterior<br />
rotation of 30° of the Cyrno-Sardinian plate at the end<br />
of the Oligocene and early Miocene from the adjacent<br />
coast of Provence, Languedoc and NE Catalonia.<br />
Materials are calcareous from the Triassic to the terti<br />
ary except in Menorca, where the geology is more<br />
heterogeneous and contains silicic esquists. The flora<br />
is typically Mediterranean dominated by evergreen<br />
sclerophyllous shrubs and forests. The Balearic Is<br />
lands form two different groups in terms of their geol<br />
ogy and endemism. The eastern Balearic Islands or<br />
Gymnesias Islands (Mallorca and Menorca) that have<br />
Tyrrhenian affinities, and the western Balearic Islands<br />
or Pithyusic Islands (Eivissa and Formentera) that<br />
have an Iberian and North African affinity.<br />
ecologia <strong>mediterranea</strong> <strong>25</strong> (2) - <strong>1999</strong>
VilCI & Munoz Diversity ofexotic and endemic plants in the Balearic Islands<br />
Region Area (km2) No. endemics (%) No. endemics/loglO area Family diversitya Abundance b<br />
Balearic Islands 5014 89 (6) 24 2.9 2.2<br />
Mallorca 3655.9 70 (5.8) 19.6 2.6 2.3<br />
Menorca 701.8 39 (4.4) 13.7 2.5 2.6<br />
Pithyusic Islands 623.3 26 (2.3) 9.3 2.9 2.4<br />
Pithyusic Islands = Eivissa and Formentera.<br />
aCalculated as the Shannon index = -EPix1nPi where Pi is the number of endemic taxa in family i divided by the total number of endemic taxa.<br />
b Median value of 1= RRR (very rare), 2 = RR (rare), 3 = R (not abundant), 4 = C (relatively common), 5 = CC (common) and 6 = CCC (very<br />
common) according to Bolos et al (1993) nomenclature.<br />
Table I. Numbers of endemic taxa of the Balearic Islands<br />
Family No. endemic taxa (%)1 No. native non-endemic taxa (%)1 X 2<br />
PI umbaginaceae 14 (15.7) 18(1.3) 627.7 *<br />
Fabaceae 12 (13.5) 132 (9.7) 1.5 ns<br />
Asteraceae 9 (10.1) 151(11.1) 0.0 ns<br />
Labiatae 7 (7.8) 46(3.4) 6.5 *<br />
Umbelliferae 6 (6.7) 52 (3.8) 2.5 ns<br />
Scrophulariaceae 4 (4.5) 46 (3.4) 0.3 ns<br />
Rubiaceae 4 (4.5) 24 (1.8) 4.2 *<br />
Caryophyllaceae 3 (3.4) 59 (4.3) 0.3 ns<br />
Euphorbiaceae 3 (3.4) 26 (1.9) 1.0 ns<br />
Ranunculaceae 3 (3.4) 29 (2.1) 0.65 ns<br />
I number oftaxa in the family/total number oftaxa ofthe respective group<br />
* p< 0.05, ns = not significant. X 2 compares the no. endemic taxa (%) with the no. native non-endemic taxa (%).<br />
If significant, the family is over-represented.<br />
Table 2. The ten largest families of endemic taxa in the Balearic Islands<br />
Lifeform<br />
Therophytes<br />
Hemicryptophytes<br />
Nanophanerophytes<br />
Macrophanerophytes<br />
Phanerophytes<br />
Chamaephytes<br />
Geophytes<br />
% endemics<br />
5.6<br />
27.0<br />
13.5<br />
1.1<br />
44.9<br />
7.9<br />
% exotics<br />
37.9<br />
17.7<br />
5.6<br />
11.3<br />
5.6<br />
12.1<br />
9.7<br />
Table 3. Percentage of lifeforms of endemic and exotic taxa in the Balearic Islands<br />
Distribution and abundance of the endemic taxa<br />
Of the 89 endemic taxa, 5 are also endemic in other<br />
north-eastern regions of Spain: Medicago arborea<br />
subsp. citrina (Papilionaceae) also endemic to Co<br />
lumbretes islands (Valencia), Asplenium petrarchae<br />
subsp. majoricum (Polypodiaceae), Asperula cynan<br />
chica subsp. paui (Rubiaceae) and Saxifraga corsica<br />
subsp. cossoniana (Saxifragaceae) are also present in<br />
Valencia and Limonium gobertii (Plumbaginaceae) is<br />
also endemic to Catalonia.<br />
Mallorca is the island with most endemic taxa, and<br />
with the highest density and family diversity of endemic<br />
taxa. Endemic taxa have low abundance (R) or<br />
are rare (RR) in all islands (Table I).<br />
156<br />
Most endemic plants occur on rocky habitats (64<br />
%) in the mountaintops mainly in non coastal sites<br />
(39.36 %). Coastal communities also display a great<br />
proportion of endemic plants (35.11 %). Only 7 taxa<br />
are located in ruderal communities. There are 10 en<br />
demic taxa in shrublands and only two in forests (Ta<br />
ble 4).<br />
Diversity and origin of the exotic taxa<br />
The Balearic Islands display 124 exotic taxa dis<br />
tributed in 46 families that represent 8.4% of the total<br />
flora. Only one exotic species is a gymnosperm, 17<br />
are monocotyledons and 106 are dicotyledons. Den<br />
sity and family diversity for exotics are 33.5 and 3.31<br />
respectively (Table 5).<br />
ecologia <strong>mediterranea</strong> <strong>25</strong> (2) - <strong>1999</strong>
Vi/a & Muiioz Diversity ofexotic and endemic plants in the Balearic Islands<br />
Family No. exotic taxa (%)1 No. native taxa (%)1<br />
Asteraceae 17 (13.7) 160 (10.8)<br />
Fabaceae 14 (11.3) 144 (9.9)<br />
Solanaceae 9 (7.2) 16 (Ll)<br />
Poaceae 7 (5.6) 160 (10.8)<br />
Amaranthaceae 6 (4.8) 9 (0.6)<br />
Brassicaceae 6 (4.8) 59 (4)<br />
Euphorbiaceae 6 (4.8) 29 (2.2)<br />
Iridaceae 6 (4.8) 11 (0.7)<br />
Labiatae 5 (4) 53 (3.4)<br />
Chenopodiaceae 4 (3.2) 30 (2.0)<br />
J number oftaxa in the family/total number oftaxa ofthe respective group<br />
*** p< 0.001, * p< 0.05, ns = not significant. X 2 compares the no. exotic taxa (%)<br />
with the no. native taxa (%). If significant, the family is over-represented.<br />
Table 6. The ten largest families of exotic taxa in the Balearic Islands<br />
Region<br />
Non tropical America<br />
Tropical America<br />
Mediterranean region<br />
Africa<br />
Asia<br />
Middle East<br />
Sub<strong>mediterranea</strong>n region<br />
Tropical<br />
Oceania<br />
Macaronesia<br />
Unknown<br />
In the Balearic Islands, the most represented exotics<br />
have an American origin like for other Mediterranean<br />
Basin regions (Di Castri, 1989; Groves & Di<br />
Castri, 1991), and the families with the largest number<br />
of exotic taxa belong also to the largest families<br />
world-wide i.e. Asteraceae, Fabaceae, Poaceae<br />
(Weber, 1997; Daehler, 1998; Pysek, 1998). However,<br />
some families were over-represented. This may partly<br />
be explained by deliberate and reiterated introductions<br />
of certain taxa and by specific features of these taxa,<br />
making them more invasive. It may also reflect the<br />
identity of naturalised plants, e.g. the Amaranthaceae<br />
contain many weeds in agroecosystems.<br />
There is not a strong overlap of habitats occupied<br />
by endemic and exotic taxa. While endemic taxa are<br />
located in more isolated pristine habitats, exotic taxa<br />
are located in most disturbed habitats, except for<br />
coastal communities where an important proportion of<br />
both taxa co-occur. These habitats, are the ones where<br />
endemics will be most threatened by invasion by exotics.<br />
For example, invasion of Carpobrotus edulis is<br />
very high in the Mallorcan coast and is threatening<br />
several endemic Limonium spp. (PANDION, 1997).<br />
Moreover, in coastal habitats the human influence is<br />
ecologia <strong>mediterranea</strong> <strong>25</strong> (2) - <strong>1999</strong><br />
No. taxa<br />
26<br />
18<br />
26<br />
13<br />
10<br />
10<br />
5<br />
4<br />
2<br />
1<br />
19<br />
% taxa<br />
19.4<br />
13.4<br />
19.4<br />
9.7<br />
7.5<br />
7.5<br />
3.7<br />
3.0<br />
1.5<br />
0.7<br />
14.2<br />
Table 7. Biogeographic origin of exotic taxa of the Balearic Islands<br />
1.2 ns<br />
0.3 ns<br />
99.0 ***<br />
2.8 ns<br />
78.6 ***<br />
0.3 ns<br />
5.0 *<br />
60.7 ***<br />
0.1 ns<br />
0.9 ns<br />
the strongest, and this increases the rate of species introduction<br />
and threat to endemics.<br />
Isolated edaphic systems appear to be major endemic<br />
centres (G6mez-Campo et aI., 1984). Besides<br />
crop fields, most exotic taxa were found in anthropogenic<br />
habitats (dumps, roadsides). Water courses are<br />
especially prone to invasion by exotic plants because<br />
they act as effective corridors providing a route for the<br />
dispersal of water-borne propagu1es (de Waal et aI.,<br />
1994). Very few exotics succeed in closed forest and<br />
shrublands. Low disturbance levels may prevent invasion<br />
of closed forest and shrub1ands (Hobbs & Huenneke,<br />
1992).<br />
Often the term rarity is confused with that of endangered<br />
taxa but they are not synonyms (Kruckeberg<br />
& Rabinowitz, 1985). It is important to notice that in<br />
average both endemic and exotic taxa are rare. However,<br />
putative mechanisms of rarefaction are different<br />
in both group of taxa and their fate may also discourse<br />
in opposite directions. At the human scale, we have<br />
witnessed changes from common to rare in native taxa<br />
and from rare to common in exotic taxa (Kruckeberg<br />
& Rabinowitz, 1985). The rarity status of exotic taxa<br />
does not prevent their invasion status either. Because<br />
159
Vila & MuilOZ<br />
rarity depends on geographical range, habitat speci<br />
ficity and population size, one exotic taxa can be re<br />
stricted to a small geographical area but be very<br />
abundant or vice-versa, have widespread small popu<br />
lations. In both cases its presence may be considered<br />
invasive and may have an impact on the native biota<br />
and ecosystem functioning (Rabinowitz et al., 1986).<br />
Endemics and exotics are two faces of the same<br />
coin because management of both taxa have strong<br />
conservation implications. Five percent of the overall<br />
flora of the Balearic Islands is seriously endangered<br />
(Mus & Mayol, 1993). In addition, new introduced<br />
species are becoming naturalised (Fraga & Pallicer,<br />
1998). Because low-altitude areas are both fairly rich<br />
in threatened endemic taxa and exotic taxa there is a<br />
need to tackle conservation priorities in these habitats<br />
and to reduce main threats which are from more to<br />
less important: tourism, fire, overgrazing, urbanisation<br />
and cropping (Medail & Quezel, 1997).<br />
Conservation priorities should be strongly en<br />
forced to those taxa that are evolutionary unique<br />
(Williams et al., 1994). In the Balearic Islands, relict<br />
taxa (paleoendemics) should be conserved because<br />
they are those that have gone through major distur<br />
bances and environmental changes. Paleoendemics<br />
include species represented by monospecific genera<br />
(Naufraga balearica), morphologically isolated spe<br />
cies (Pimpinella bicknellii, Daphne rodriguezii), and<br />
those without clear affinities (Helichrysum ambiguum,<br />
Hypericum balearicum, Paeonia cambessedesii) some<br />
of which are located in coastal habitats also invaded<br />
by exotic species.<br />
More studies like this one should be conducted at<br />
other regions in order to have a global assessment of<br />
the diversity and distribution of endemic and exotic<br />
taxa. Next research step should focus on the experi<br />
mental study of the ecological mechanisms that con<br />
trol the establishment of plants of conservation<br />
interest (Mack, 1996), such as the studies undertaken<br />
with Cyclamen balearicum (Affre et al., 1995) or the<br />
ones currently analysed by Traveset et al. (unp. data)<br />
on endemics, in order to have ecological bases for<br />
conservation efforts as for example the Ligusticum<br />
huteri Porta reintroduction program (Vicens, 1998).<br />
Acknowledgements<br />
We thank F. Lloret, A. Traveset, E. Weber, P. Py<br />
sek and D. Jeanmonod for their valuable comments on<br />
160<br />
Diversity ofexotic and endemic plants in the Balearic Islands<br />
earlier drafts of the manuscript. Partial financial sup<br />
port was provided by the Comissi6 Interdepartamental<br />
de Ciencia i Tecnologia (CIRIT) de la Generalitat de<br />
Catalunya.<br />
REFERENCES<br />
Affre L., Thompson J. D. & Debussche M. 1995. The reproductive<br />
biology of the Mediterranean endemic Cyclamen<br />
balearicum Willk. (Primulaceae). Bot. J. Linnean Soc..<br />
118: 309-330.<br />
Atkinson I. A. E. & Cameron E. W. 1993. Human influence<br />
on the terrestrial biota and biotic communities of New<br />
Zealand. Trends Ecol. Evol., 8: 447-451.<br />
Bolos 0., Vigo J., Masalles R.M. & Ninot J.M. 1993. Flora<br />
manual dels Pai"sos Catalans. Ed. Portic, Barcelona,<br />
1247 p.<br />
Bonafe F. 1980. Flora de Mallorca. 4 vol Ed. Moll, Palma.<br />
Cardona M. A. & Contandriopoulos J. 1979. Endemism and<br />
evolution in the islands of the western <strong>mediterranea</strong>n.<br />
In: Bramwell D. (ed.), Plants and Islands. Academic<br />
Press, London: 133-169.<br />
Carlquist S. 1965. Island Biology: a natural history of the<br />
islands ofthe world. Nat. Hist. Press, Garden City.<br />
Cody M. L. 1986. Diversity, rarity, and conservation in<br />
<strong>mediterranea</strong>n-climate regions. In: Soule M. E. (ed.),<br />
Conservation biology. The science ofscarcity and diversity.<br />
Sinauer Ass., Massachusetts: 122-152.<br />
Cody M. L. & McCoverton J. 1996. Short-term evolution of<br />
reduced dispersal in island plant populations. 1. Ecol.,<br />
84: 53-61.<br />
Contandriopoulos J. & Cardona M. A. 1984. Caractere<br />
original de la flore endemique des Baleares. Botanica<br />
Helvetica, 94: 101-131.<br />
Cowling RM., Rundel P.W., Lamont B.B., Arroyo M.K. &<br />
Arianoutsou M. 1996. Plant diversity in <strong>mediterranea</strong>nclimate<br />
regions. Trends Ecol. Evol., I I: 362-366.<br />
Cowling R. M. & Hilton-Taylor C. 1997. Phytogeography,<br />
flora and endemism. In: Cowling R. M., Richardson D.<br />
M. & Pierse S. M. (eds.). Vegetation ofSouthern Africa,<br />
Cambridge University Press, Cambridge: 43-61.<br />
Cowling R. M. & Samways M. J. 1995. Predicting global<br />
patterns of endemic plant species richness. Biodiv. Letters,<br />
2: 127-131.<br />
Daehler C. C. 1998. The taxonomic distribution of invasive<br />
angiosperm plants: ecological insights and comparison<br />
to agricultural weeds. Bioi. Conserv., 84: 167-180.<br />
D'Antonio C. M. & Dudley T. L. 1995. Biological invasions<br />
as agents of change on islands versus mainlands. In:<br />
Vitousek P. M., Loope L. L. & Adsersen H. (eds.). Islands:<br />
biological diversity and ecosystem jitllction.<br />
Springer-Verlag, Berlin: 103-121.<br />
De Waal L. c., Child L. E., Wade P. M., Brock J. H. 1994.<br />
Ecology and management of invasive riverside plants.<br />
John Wiley & Sons, Chichester.<br />
Di Castri, F. 1989. History of biological invasions with special<br />
emphasis on the Old World. In: Drake J., Mooney<br />
H.A., Di Castri F. et al. (eds.). Biological invasions: a<br />
global perspective. John Wiley & Sons, NewYork: 1-30.<br />
Drake J.A., Mooney RA., Di Castri F., Groves K.H., Kruger<br />
F. S., Rejmanek M. & Williamson M. 1989. Bio-<br />
ecologia <strong>mediterranea</strong> <strong>25</strong> (2) - <strong>1999</strong>
Vila & Mufioz<br />
logical invasions. a global perspective. Scope 37. John<br />
Wiley & Sons, New York.<br />
Eliasson, U. 1995. Patterns of diversity in island plants. In:<br />
Vitousek P. M., Loope L. L. & Adsersen H. (eds). Islands:<br />
biological diversity and ecosystem function<br />
Springer-Verlag, Berlin: 35-50.<br />
Fraga P. & Pallicer X. 1998. Notes florfstiques de Menorca.<br />
Butlletf de la Instituci6 Catalana d'Historia Natural, 66:<br />
35-40.<br />
Gaston K. J. 1994. Rarity. Chapman & Hall, London. 205p.<br />
G6mez-Campo L., Bermudez-De- Castro L., Casiga M. J.,<br />
Sanchez-Yelamo M. D. 1984. Endemism in the Iberian<br />
Peninsula and Balearic Islands. Webbia, 38: 709-714.<br />
Groves R. H. & Di Castri F. 1991. Biogeography of Mediterranean<br />
invasions. Cambridge University Press, Cambridge.<br />
485 p.<br />
Hobbs R. J. & Huenneke L. F. 1992. Disturbance, diversity<br />
and invasion: implicatiosn for conservation. Conserv.<br />
Bioi., 6: 324-337.<br />
Houston D. B. & Schreiner E. G. 1994. Alien species in National<br />
Parks: drawing lines in space and time. Conserv.<br />
Bioi., 9: 204-209<br />
Jeanmonod D. 1998. Les plantes introduites en Corse: impact,<br />
menaces et propositions de protection de la flore<br />
indigene. Biocosme Mesogeen, 15: 45-68.<br />
Kruckeberg A. R. & Rabinowitz D. 1985. Biological aspects<br />
of endemism in higher plants. Ann. Rev. Ecol. Syst., 16:<br />
447-479.<br />
Lean G. & Hinrichsen D. 1990. Atlas of the environment.<br />
Arrow Books, London. 192 p.<br />
Lonsdale W. M. <strong>1999</strong>. Global patterns of plant invasions<br />
and the concept of invasibility. Ecology, 80: 1522-1536.<br />
Loope L. L., Mueller-Dombois D. 1989. Characteristics of<br />
invaded islands, with special reference to Hawaii. In:<br />
Drake J. A., Mooney H. A., Di Castri F., Groves K. H.,<br />
Kruger F. S., Rejmanek M. & Williamson M. (eds.),<br />
Biological Invasions. A Global Perspective. Scope 37,<br />
John Wiley & Sons, New York: <strong>25</strong>7-281.<br />
Mack R. N. 1996. Predicting the identity and fate of plant<br />
invaders: emergent and emerging approaches. Bioi.<br />
Conserv.,78: 107-121.<br />
McDonald 1. A. W. & Cooper J. 1995. Insular lessons for<br />
global biodiversity conservation with particular reference<br />
to alien invasions. In: Vitousek P. M., Loope L. L.<br />
& Adsersen H. (eds.). Islands: biological diversity and<br />
ecosystem function. Springer-Verlag, Berlin: pp. 189<br />
204.<br />
McIntyre S. 1992. Risks associated with the setting of conservation<br />
priorities from rare plant species lists. BioI.<br />
Conserv., 60: 31-37.<br />
Medail F. & Quezel P. 1997. Hot-spots analysis for conservation<br />
of plant biodiversity in the Mediterranean basin.<br />
Ann. Missouri Bot. Gard., 84: 112-127.<br />
Medail F. & Verlaque R. 1997. Ecological characteristics<br />
and rarity of endemic plants from Southeast France and<br />
Corsica: implications for biodiversity conservation. Bioi.<br />
Conserv., 80: 269-281.<br />
ecologia <strong>mediterranea</strong> <strong>25</strong> (2) - <strong>1999</strong><br />
Diversity ofexotic and endemic plants in the Balearic Islands<br />
Mus M. & Mayol J. 1993. Plans de Conservaci6 dels vegetals<br />
amenaf;ats ales Balears. Documents tecnics de<br />
Conservaci6. Govern Balear. Direcci6 General<br />
d'Estructures Agr. i Medi Natural. Palma de Mallorca.<br />
PANDION 1997. Memoria del projecte de protecci6 dels<br />
Limonium de Punta Carregadors i control de poblacions<br />
de Carpobrotus edulis. Govern Balear. Conselleria<br />
de Medi Ambient, Palma de Mallorca.<br />
Pia V., Sastre B. & Llorens Ll. 1992. Aproximaci6 al<br />
cataleg de laflora vascular de les Illes Balears. Universitat<br />
de les Illes Balears. Jardf Botanic de S6ller<br />
(MBCN), Palma de Mallorca.<br />
Prance G. T. & Elias T. S. 1977. Extinction isforever. New<br />
York Botanical Garden, New York.<br />
Pysek P. 1998. Is there a taxonomic pattern to plant invasions?<br />
Oikos, 82: 282-294.<br />
Rabinowitz D., Cairns S. & Dillon T. 1986. Seven forms of<br />
rarity and their frequency in the flora of the British isles.<br />
In: Soule M. E. Conservation biology. The science of<br />
scarcity and diversity. Sinauer Ass., Massachussets:<br />
182-205.<br />
Raunkiaer C. 1934. The life-forms of plants and statistical<br />
plant geography. Clarendon Press, Oxford.<br />
Rejmanek M. & Randall J. M. 1994. Invasive alien plants in<br />
California: 1993 summary and comparison with other<br />
areas in North America. Madrofio, 41: 161-177.<br />
Romo A. 1994. Flores si/vestres de las Baleares. Ed. Rueda,<br />
Madrid.<br />
Schierenbeck K. A. 1995. The threat to the California flora<br />
from invasive species; problems and possible solutions.<br />
Madrofio,42: 168-174.<br />
Schiffman P. M. 1997. Wing reduction in island Coreopsis<br />
gigantea achenes. Madrm!o, 44: 394-396.<br />
Schwartz M.W. 1993. The search for pattern among rare<br />
plants: are primitive species more likely to be rare? BioI.<br />
Conserv.,64: 121-127.<br />
Sim6n J. C. 1994. La flora vascular espafiola: diversidad y<br />
conservaci6n. Ecologfa (ICONA), 8: 203-2<strong>25</strong>.<br />
Solbrig O. T. 1994. The complex structure of the taxonomic<br />
system. In: Peng C. 1. & Chou C. H. (eds.). Biodiversity<br />
and Terrestrial Ecosystems. Institute of Botany, Academia<br />
Sinica Monograph Series, 14, Taipei: 7-14.<br />
Usher M. B. 1986. Invasibi1ity and wildlife conservation:<br />
invasive species on nature reserves. Phi/os. Trans. R.<br />
Soc. Lond., B 314: 695-710.<br />
Vicens M. 1998. PIa de recuperaci6 de Ligusticum huteri<br />
Porta. Govern Ba1ear. Conselleria de Medi Ambient,<br />
Ordenaci6 del Territori i Litoral, Palma de Mallorca.<br />
Vitousek P. M., D'Antonio C. M., Loope L. L., Rejmanek<br />
M. & Westbrooks R. 1997. Introduced species: a significant<br />
component of human-caused global change.<br />
New Zealand J. Ecol., 21: 1-16.<br />
Weber E. 1997. The alien flora of Europe: a taxonomic and<br />
biogeographic review. J. Veg. Sci., 8: 565-572.<br />
Williams P. H., Vane-Wright R. 1. & Humphries C. J. 1994.<br />
Measuring biodiversity for choosing conservation areas.<br />
In: Lasalle J. & Gau1d 1. D. (eds.). Hymenoptera and<br />
biodiversity. CAB Internat. Wallingford : 309-328.<br />
161
Aidoud et al. Changements edaphiques le long d'un gradient d'intensif1.5 de paturage dans une steppe d'Algerie<br />
ABRIDGED ENGLISH VERSION<br />
The aim of the present paper is to emphasise the effects<br />
of overgrazing on soil through a set of characters. The study<br />
was conducted in an arid steppe (mean annual rainfall: 260<br />
mm). The study area is located in the western part of the<br />
steppic high-plains of Algeria. This region has been subject<br />
to land degradation due to overgrazing which is one of the<br />
main causes of desertification in arid rangelands. During the<br />
two last decades, vegetation has been marked by important<br />
changes that have been pointed out through a long-term<br />
monitoring of phytomass, primary net productivity and specific<br />
composition.<br />
Steppic landscape is dominated by pediment surfaces<br />
gently sloped «2%) subject to erosion by wind. Soils are<br />
shallow over a limestone crust at 15 to 30 cm depth. The<br />
study was undertaken using a grazing gradient method. The<br />
chosen transect includes three levels of grazing intensity:<br />
(I) a non-grazed exclosure PO of the pristine system that had<br />
been, 20 years ago, a typical steppe with an alfa-grass pure<br />
stand under homogeneous environmental conditions; (2) a<br />
field PI of about 500 ha under controlled grazing with 0.<strong>25</strong><br />
unit/ha stocking rate; (3) the rest of the steppic open rangelands<br />
P3 in which the stocking rate has rapidly increased<br />
reaching 0.50-0.75 unit/ha in 1990. Perennial plant cover,<br />
sand cover, soil organic matter and texture are the main indicators<br />
used to assess soil degradation. The main results are<br />
the following:<br />
(I) at the transect scale:<br />
- soil features within the non-grazed exclosure (PO) remain<br />
similar to those of the pre-existing system. The dominant<br />
INTRODUCTION<br />
La desertification peut etre definie comme une de<br />
gradation des terres sous climat aride (s.l.). Cette defi<br />
nition simple, adoptee par la Conference des Nations<br />
Unies pour l'Environnement et le Developpement en<br />
1992, cache en fait une grande complexite qui se reflete<br />
a travers le debat actuel autour de ce concept<br />
(Hellden, 1988; Thomas & Middleton, 1993; Dodd,<br />
1994; Hutchinson, 1996; Thomas, 1997). Dans ce<br />
debat, le caractere reversible ou irreversible des chan<br />
gements demeure une question centrale (Mainguet,<br />
1994, 1998). Un indicateur incontestable<br />
d'irreversibilite, considere comme ultime changement,<br />
est la degradation du sol (Friedel, 1992 ; Floret et al.,<br />
1992 ; Mainguet, 1994 ; Milton et al., 1994). Les sols<br />
sous climat aride sont pauvres en matiere organique<br />
(Evenari, 1985) ce qui confere au systeme une faible<br />
resilience vis-a-vis des changements naturels ou in<br />
duits par l'homme (Albaladejo et al., 1998). Aussi, les<br />
dommages causes dans ces milieux sont-ils difficiles a<br />
reparer (Milton et aI., 1994).<br />
Sous climat aride, la desertification agit par stades<br />
successifs (Milton et al., 1994). L'un des premiers<br />
164<br />
perennial Stipa tenacissima covers 36 ± 5%, the sand layer<br />
is almost completely lacking, soil organic matter rate is 1.7 ±<br />
0.3% and clay and fine-silt rate is 29 ± 5%;<br />
- on heavily grazed area (P2), the difference with PO is<br />
highly significant (p
Aidoud et al. Changements edaphiques le long d'un gradient d'intensite de paturage dans une steppe d'Algerie<br />
homogene au depart, ont montre une dynamique di<br />
rectionnelle regressive de la vegetation, dont la cause<br />
principale est le surpaturage par les ovins (Aidoud,<br />
1989, 1994). Des changements ont ete mis en evi<br />
dence, le long d'un transect d'intensite de paturage,<br />
par la baisse de la biomasse de l'espece perenne dominante<br />
(Aidoud & Touffet, 1996) et par des change<br />
ments de composition specifique de la vegetation ainsi<br />
que des caracteres de surface du sol (Aidoud, 1994;<br />
Slimani, 1998). Le transect utilise represente un gra<br />
dient comportant trois etats de paturage : nul, contr61e<br />
et libre. II constitue une situation experimentale in<br />
natura permettant d'approcher des changements dans<br />
le temps par la transposition de variations analysees<br />
dans l'espace (Pickup, 1992).<br />
Le present travail, qui s'integre a cette approche, a<br />
pour objectif de verifier, le long de ce meme transect,<br />
en se basant sur les principaux caracteres du sol sous<br />
climat aride, l'hypothese d'un changement edaphique<br />
significatif.<br />
CADRE D'ETUDE ET METHODOLOGIE<br />
Le plateau de Rogassa, couvrant pres de 30 000 ha,<br />
est situe a une trentaine de km au nord de la ville d'EI<br />
Bayadh. Les principales caracteristiques ecologiques<br />
sont donnees dans le tableau I. Les donnees meteoro<br />
iogiques placent le site dans l'etage mediterraneen<br />
aride moyen a hiver froid au sens d'Emberger. Jus<br />
qu' au debut des annees 1980, le paysage vegetal etait<br />
une nappe alfatiere de plaine consideree parmi les plus<br />
denses et les plus homogenes d' AIgerie et ou Stipa<br />
tenacissima L. assurait pres de 95% du couvert vege<br />
tal global. La vegetation du plateau de Rogassa a ete<br />
integree aux groupements d'alfa purs selon l'analyse<br />
realisee dans le bassin du Chott Chergui du Sud<br />
Oranais (Aidoud-Lounis, 1989). Exploitee en paturage<br />
colIectif et libre, cette steppe supportait, dans son etat<br />
preexistant, une charge pastorale moyenne de 0,<strong>25</strong><br />
unite ovine par hectare. La charge a augmente tres ra<br />
pidement atteignant 0,5 a 0,75 uo/ha en 1990 (Aidoud<br />
& Touffet, 1996).<br />
Le terme « plateau» est attribue au site etudie en<br />
raison de la topographie homogene qu'imprime le gla<br />
cis d'erosion sub-horizontal ou legerement ondule<br />
(versant-glacis) du quaternaire ancien (Pouget, 1980).<br />
Situee a une profondeur de 20 a 30 cm, la croOte cal<br />
caire zonaire, feuilIetee et tres dure en surface, est ca<br />
racteristique de ce type de glacis (RueIlan, 1971). A la<br />
ecologia <strong>mediterranea</strong> <strong>25</strong> (2) - <strong>1999</strong><br />
surface du sol, dominent les elements grossiers (gra<br />
viers) et la pellicule de gla
Aidoud et al. Changements edaphiques le long d'un gradient d'intensite de paturage dans une steppe d'Algerie<br />
et 4,22 pour I' axe 2), Cette ordination, conforme au<br />
gradient de paturage, souligne I'importance de ce fac<br />
teur sur les caracteres traites.<br />
Le relcve situe a l'extremite negative de l'axe 2 se<br />
detache nettement du groupe P2. Les donnees de ce<br />
releve, non representatif car localise dans une depres<br />
sion (daya), n'ont pas ete integrees aux analyses ci<br />
apres.<br />
Les caracteres du couvert vegetal et du sol, le long<br />
du transect, sont resumes dans le tableau 2. Les ca<br />
racteres de surface qui varient le plus significative<br />
ment sont le couvert vegetal et le voile sableux. Le<br />
couvert dcs plantes perennes diminue de 36 a 16 %,<br />
soit plus de la moitie, entre la parcelle mise en defens<br />
(PO) et le terrain surpature (P2). La diminution du<br />
couvert vegetal global est de 40 % mais a cependant<br />
une valeur indicatrice moindre en raison de la plus<br />
grande fluctuation des especes annuelles. Dans<br />
l'espace intcrstitiel ou sol nu, le voile sableux, prati<br />
quement absent dans PO, atteint, dans P2, un taux de<br />
couverture de pres de 50 % et une epaisseur de pres de<br />
8 cm en moyenne.<br />
Ces changements edaphiques le long du transect se<br />
traduisent, correlativement et tres nettement, par une<br />
baisse des argiles et Iimons fins et du taux de matiere<br />
organique. Les variations des caracteres edaphiques,<br />
mesurees sous la touffe et dans le sol interstitiel, sont<br />
significatives. La variation est cependant nettement<br />
plus importante en considerant la couche de surface.<br />
La baisse globale du taux d'argiles et limons fins<br />
est de 43 % entre PO et PI. Elle est de 87 % dans la<br />
couche superficielle du sol sous la touffe et de 84 %<br />
entre lcs touffes. La diminution, moindre dans la<br />
deuxieme couche (47 et 28 %), reste cependant signi<br />
ficative, Exprimee selon les classes definies par Pou<br />
get (1980), la texture passe de «grossiere» a « tres<br />
grossiere » sous la touffe et de « moyenne» a « tres<br />
grossiere » dans l'espace entre les touffes.<br />
Les valeurs obtenues dans P I (sous paturage<br />
controle) sont a la fois intermediaires et significative<br />
ment differentes de celles correspondant a PO et P2.<br />
Elles demcurent cependant, comme illustre par la fi<br />
gure I, plus proches de la situation de mise en defens.<br />
La baisse de matiere organique dans le sol est glo<br />
balement dc 38%. Elle suit a peu pres la meme evolu<br />
tion que celle des argiles et limons fins, mais dans des<br />
proportions legerement inferieures. Cette diminution<br />
est, respectivement pour le sol sous la touffe et le sol<br />
168<br />
interstitiel, de 63 et 59 % pour la couche superieure et<br />
de <strong>25</strong> et 35 % en profondeur.<br />
A l'echelle stationnelle, c'est dans la zone surpatu<br />
ree que les differences sont hautement significatives<br />
(p
Aidoud et al. Changements edaphiques le long d'un gradient d'intensite de paturage dans une steppe d'Algerie<br />
(1982), l'isohumisme qui est souvent reconnu dans ce<br />
type de sol ne serait qu'apparent. En effet, la decom<br />
position relativement active de la litiere dans cette<br />
steppe (Bessah, 1998), suggere un apport organique<br />
essentiellement lie aux parties aeriennes de l'alfa. La<br />
faible contribution a la biomasse tota1e des organes<br />
souterrains (Aidoud, 1989), en accord avec la synthese<br />
dressee par Barbour (1981) pour les zones arides en<br />
general, peut conforter cette hypothese. Ceci doit ce<br />
pendant etre relativise, car les processus fonctionnels<br />
en cause doivent etre consideres plus en terme de turn<br />
over de la matiere organique qu'en terme de biomasse.<br />
Les changements edaphiques observes le long du<br />
gradient peuvent s'expliquer par la reduction du cou<br />
vert de l'alfa. La deterioration d'attributs vitaux eda<br />
phiques (Aronson et al., 1995) du systeme, tels que la<br />
texture ou la matiere organique, a pu etre evaluee ainsi<br />
apres une periode relativement courte de moins de dix<br />
ans. Cette rapidite est confirmee en Espagne, par Al<br />
baladejo et al. (1998) qui montrent qu'apres environ 5<br />
ans la reduction de la couverture vegetale peut se re<br />
percuter significativement sur les caracteristiques du<br />
sol par la baisse de la matiere organique et la deterioration<br />
des proprietes physiques.<br />
AI'echelle stationnelle, la vegetation steppique est<br />
constituee de touffes separees par un espace interstitiel<br />
a couverture vegetale tres faible. Dans la parcelle<br />
protegee PO, les resultats montrent une difference si<br />
gnificative entre touffe et espace interstitiel pour les<br />
caracteres edaphiques, en particulier ceux de la couche<br />
de surface. lis confirment ceux obtenus notamment<br />
par Puigdefabregas & Sanchez (1996), Cerda (1997)<br />
et Domingo et al. (1998), montrant le role que la<br />
touffe d'alfa joue, dans le systeme, par ses aptitudes a<br />
intercepter et a retenir l'eau et les sediments. La rela<br />
tion entre la baisse de vigueur des touffes d'alfa et la<br />
sensibilite a l'erosion a ete montree par simulation<br />
(Sanchez & Puigdefabregas, 1994). Ajoutees ases ca<br />
pacites adaptatives a l'aridite (Nedjraoui, 1990; Ai<br />
doud, 1992 ; Pugnaire & Haase, 1996), ces proprietes<br />
font de l'alfa une « espece clef de voute » du systeme,<br />
au sens de Aronson et al. (1995). A l'oppose, dans la<br />
zone surpaturee P2, le deperissement des touffes en<br />
trai'ne la destruction de leurs proprietes edaphiques et<br />
en particulier du role protecteur contre l'erosion. La<br />
difference plus faible entre la touffe et l'espace inters<br />
titiel dans la zone P2 reflete la destruction de la structure<br />
du systeme, tendance qui semble se refleter a tra<br />
vers la composition de la vegetation (Aidoud, 1994).<br />
ecologia <strong>mediterranea</strong> <strong>25</strong> (2) - <strong>1999</strong><br />
Dans le Sud-Oranais, cet etat correspond acelui de<br />
l'ensemble des anciennes steppes d'alfa de plaine. Le<br />
niveau de degradation atteint constitue un stade irre<br />
versible qui peut indiquer d'un point de vue edaphi<br />
que, un seuil fondamental entre paturage et surpatu<br />
rage. Notons que 1'« irreversibilite » est employee ici<br />
dans la sens Oll la restauration s.s. (Aronson et al.,<br />
1995) du systeme preexistant est devenue tres peu<br />
probable, voire impossible. Dans la logique pastorale<br />
actuelle, la zone PI sous paturage controle, malgre les<br />
changements edaphiques observes, constitue le sys<br />
teme de reference presentant les normes a atteindre<br />
par rehabilitation (Aronson et al., 1995).<br />
CONCLUSION<br />
Les changements edaphiques, analyses atravers le<br />
taux de matiere organique et la texture dans les steppes<br />
d' alfa de plaine, sont significatifs. lis montrent<br />
1'importance des phenomenes de desertification dans<br />
ce type de steppes qui semblent les plus affectees en<br />
Algerie. Les resultats obtenus soulignent tout l'interet<br />
de l'approche utilisant le gradient d'intensite de patu<br />
rage, partant d'une situation de steppe soustraite au<br />
paturage durant une vingtaine d'annees, acelle Oll la<br />
steppe d'origine a pratiquement disparu par surpatu<br />
rage. La disparition des principales fonctions edaphi<br />
ques des touffes d'alfa suite a leur deperissement<br />
confirment les changements observes sur la biomasse<br />
(Aidoud & Touffet, 1996) ainsi que sur la diversite et<br />
la composition floristique (Aidoud, 1994; Slimani,<br />
1998). Les changements edaphiques restent cependant<br />
moins importants en profondeur qu'en surface, tradui<br />
sant ainsi une certaine inertie du systeme. Malgre<br />
l'intensite de degradation, les attributs edaphiques,<br />
dans le pire des cas, n'ont pas atteint les niveaux ob<br />
serves dans un desert et une rehabilitation demeure<br />
donc possible. Celle-ci reste cependant tributaire de<br />
l'efficacite et de la rapidite des mesures de gestion du<br />
rable des paturages qui doivent etre prises adifferents<br />
niveaux de decision.<br />
Remerciements<br />
Nous remercions D-Y. Alexandre, I-B. Bouzille,<br />
B. Clement et F. Roze du Service d'Ecologie (Univ.<br />
Rennes 1) pour leurs corrections et conseils, ainsi que<br />
tous les collegues chercheurs et techniciens de 1'Unite<br />
de Recherche sur les Ressources Biologiques Terres-<br />
169
Aidoud et al. Changements edaphiques le long d'un gradient d'intensite de paturage dans une steppe d'Algerie<br />
Nedjraoui D., 1990. Adaptation de ['alfa aux conditions stationnelles:<br />
contribution a I 'etude du jCJ/lctionnement de<br />
l'ecosyste,ne steppique. These de Doctorat d'Etat. Universite<br />
des Sciences et de la Technologie Houari Boumediene,<br />
Alger. <strong>25</strong>6 p.<br />
Pickup G., 1992. Dynamics of rangeland ecosystems. In:<br />
Gaston A., Kernick M. & Le Houerou H.N. (eds.), Actes<br />
du 4eme Congres International des Terres de Parcours,<br />
Montpellier, 22-26 avril 1991 : 1066- 1069.<br />
Pouget M., 1980. Les relations sol-vegetation dans les steppes<br />
Sud-algeroises. Trav. Doc. ORSTOM. 116: 1-555.<br />
Pugnaire F.T. & Haase P., 1996. Comparative physiology<br />
and growth of two perenial tussock grass species in a<br />
semi-arid environment. An/l. Bot., 77 : 81-86.<br />
Puigdefabregas J. & Sanchez G., 1996. Geomorphological<br />
implications of vegetation patchiness on semi-aride slopes.<br />
In : Anderson M.G. & Books S.M. (eds.), Advances<br />
in Hillslope processes, 2 : 1028-1060.<br />
Rognon P., 1993. La desertification : un risque majeur ? Secheresse,4<br />
: 74-74.<br />
Ruellan A., 1971. Contribution a la connaissance des sols<br />
des regions mediterraneennes. Les sols a profil calcaire<br />
ecologia <strong>mediterranea</strong> <strong>25</strong> (2) - <strong>1999</strong><br />
differencie des plaines de la basse Moulouva (Maroc<br />
oriental). ORSTOM Editions, Paris. 302 p.<br />
Sanchez G. & Puigdefabregas J., 1994. Interactions of plant<br />
growth and sediment movement on slopes in a semi-arid<br />
environment. Geomorphology, 9 : 243-260.<br />
Slimani, H. 1998. La desertijication de la steppe d'alfa (Stipa<br />
tenacissima L.) des Hautes Plaines occidentales<br />
d'Algerie : ejfets du paturage sur la vegetation et le sol.<br />
These de Magister, Univ. Sci. Technol. Houari Boumediene,<br />
AIger. 123 p.<br />
Thomas D.F.G. & Middleton N.J., 1993. Desertilreation:<br />
exploding the myth. John Wiley & Sons, Chichester.<br />
194 p.<br />
Thomas D.S.G., 1997. Science and the desertification debate.<br />
J. Arid Environ., 37 : 599-608.<br />
UNEP, 1992. World Atlas ofdesertijrcation. UNEP, Nairobi<br />
& Edward Arnold, London.<br />
Verstraet M.M. & Schwartz S.A., 1991. Desertification and<br />
global change. In : Henderson-Sellers A. & Pitman AJ.<br />
(eds), Vegetation and climate interactions in semi-arid<br />
regions. Kluwer Academic Publishers, Belgium: 3-13.<br />
171
Abd El-Ghani Soil variables affecting the vegetation ofinland western desert ofEgypt<br />
INTRODUCTION<br />
Desert vegetation in Egypt is by far the most important<br />
and characteristic type of the natural plant life.<br />
It covers vast areas and is formed mainly of xero<br />
phytic shrubs and subshrubs. Monod (1954) recog<br />
nised two types of desert vegetation, namely<br />
contracted and diffuse. Both types refer to permanent<br />
vegetation which can be accompanied by ephemeral<br />
(or annual) plant growth depending on the amount of<br />
precipitation in a given year. Kassas (1966, 1971)<br />
added a third type "accidental vegetation" where pre<br />
cipitation is so low and falls so irregularly that no<br />
permanent vegetation exists. It occurs mainly as con<br />
tracted patches in runnels, shallow depressions, hol<br />
lows, wadis and on old dunes with coarse sand.<br />
Accidental vegetation consists of species which are<br />
able to perform an annual life cycle: potential annuals<br />
(sensu Haines, 1951), or potential perennials (sensu<br />
Bornkamm, 1987), but can likewise continue growing<br />
as long as water persists in the soil. Thomas (1988)<br />
identified these plants as those with episodic growth<br />
strategies linked to immediate water availability. Re<br />
cently, Springuel (1997) classified the accidental<br />
vegetation in south eastern Egypt into three groups:<br />
run-off dependent vegetation in the main wadi chan<br />
nels, run-on dependent vegetation of playa formation,<br />
and rain dependent vegetation on levelled plains of<br />
sand sheets.<br />
In a survey of the vegetation units in the Western<br />
Desert of Egypt, outside the Oases, Bornkamm and<br />
Kehl (1990) distinguished five desert zones along a<br />
precipitation gradient. Besides the well known<br />
semidesert and full desert zones in the very north,<br />
three zones of extreme desert show a significant differentiation<br />
(Figure I). Both extreme desert zones III<br />
and IV support the growth of accidental vegetation,<br />
where the precipitation in the former amounts to 5-10<br />
(20) mm year I whereas in the latter is 1-5 mm year-I.<br />
On the other hand, extreme desert V in the very south<br />
is practically void of vegetation where precipitation is<br />
proposed to be less than 1 mm year-I. Typical acci<br />
dental vegetation types in the Western Desert of Egypt<br />
are: Zygophyllum coccineum with Salsola imbricata<br />
subsp. imbricata, Stipagrostis acutiflora with Zilla<br />
spinosa as well as stands of Salsola imbricata subsp.<br />
imbricata with Fagonia arabica. However, ground<br />
water-dependent vegetation in all the three extreme<br />
desert zones exists too: Zahran (1972) and Abd EI-<br />
174<br />
Ghani (1981, 1985) in large oases (Siwa, Bahariya and<br />
Farafra), and in small oases and depressions (Bir Saf<br />
saf, Bir EI-Shab, Bir Tarfawi and Qara): EI-Hadidi<br />
(l980b), Bornkamm (1986), Abd EI-Ghani (1992).<br />
Although our knowledge of the growth of acci<br />
dental vegetation in Egypt has considerably increased<br />
during the last two decades (Alaily et aI., 1987;<br />
Bornkamm, 1987; Springuel et aI., 1990), much less is<br />
known about this vegetation in quantitative terms. The<br />
present study aims at describing the floristic composi<br />
tion of the accidental type of vegetation growing in<br />
parts of the Western Desert of Egypt and analysing the<br />
distribution of species in relation to certain environ<br />
mental factors by applying the muItivariate analysis<br />
techniques.<br />
STUDY AREA<br />
The present study has been conducted in two con<br />
secutive extreme desert zones (sensu Bornkamm &<br />
Kehl, 1990), where the accidental type of vegetation<br />
exists. Data is from two transects: the northern one<br />
extends for a distance of about 150 km; half-way<br />
along Siwa Oasis-Mersa Matruh road, and represents<br />
the extreme desert zone III (Figure 1). This transect is<br />
principally located in the inland part of the Middle<br />
Miocene plateau that rises to about 100 m above the<br />
depression floor (reaches 20 m below sea level). The<br />
southern transect extends for a distance of about 140<br />
km, along the Dakhla-Farafra road and represents the<br />
extreme desert zone IV. It is located in the middle<br />
limestone plateau (500 m above sea level). The north<br />
ern transect lies in the Libyan Desert while the southern<br />
one in the Nubian Desert (EI-Hadidi, 1980a). In<br />
general, the landscape of the northern transect is a part<br />
of the Central Sahara, whereas the southern transect is<br />
a part of the Southern Sahara (Schiffers, 1971).<br />
According to WaIter and Breckle (1984) the study<br />
area lies in the zone of subtropical arid deserts. The<br />
temperature regime is characterised by mild winters<br />
and very hot summers. Whereas average January tem<br />
perature remains rather constant between 12°C and<br />
14°C, the July mean rises to approximately 31°C. The<br />
absolute maxima of the southern region of the study<br />
area may reach 49°C. Precipitation is erratic, variable<br />
and unpredictable with frequent long dry periods. Zahran<br />
and Willis (1992) reported that the mean annual<br />
rainfall ranges from 9.6 mm year -1 in Siwa Oasis (the<br />
nearest station to the northern transect) to nearly I mm<br />
ecologia <strong>mediterranea</strong> <strong>25</strong> (2) - <strong>1999</strong>
Abd El-Ghani Soil variables affecting the vegetation ofinland western desert ofEgypt<br />
I<br />
5 EA<br />
Figure I. Map showing the five vegetation zones of the<br />
Western Desert of Egypt (after Bornkamm & Kehl, 1990),<br />
indicating the position of the two studied transects:<br />
T n = Northern transect, T s = Southern transect<br />
year-I in Dakhla Oasis (the nearest to the southern<br />
transect). The climatic gradient along the N-S direc<br />
tion in the study area is obvious (Table 1). The Pluviothermic<br />
Quotient (Emberger, 1955) for Siwa Oasis is<br />
about 1.43, while that of Dakhla Oasis is nearly zero<br />
indicating extreme aridity.<br />
METHODS<br />
The phytosociological survey of the study area was<br />
carried out during several visits in 1986-88 and 1995<br />
96. Stands were randomly chosen at locations where<br />
either dense vegetation or change in species composition<br />
was encountered. A total of 144 stands (each of a<br />
size of <strong>25</strong> x <strong>25</strong> m) were sampled: 83 in the northern<br />
transect and 61 in the southern one. In each stand,<br />
density (individuals/lOO m 2 ) and frequency (occur<br />
rences/lOO quadrats) of the present species were esti<br />
mated using fifty I x 2 m 2 randomly located quadrats.<br />
Plant cover (m/100 m) was determined by the line<br />
intercept method (Canfield, 1941), using five parallel<br />
lines distributed randomly across the stand. Relative<br />
importance value (IV) for each species in each stand<br />
ecologia <strong>mediterranea</strong> <strong>25</strong> (2) - <strong>1999</strong><br />
was calculated by the sum of its relative density, fre<br />
quency and cover (it has a maximum value out of<br />
300). Voucher specimens of each species were col<br />
lected, identified and deposited in the Herbarium of<br />
Cairo University (CAI). Taxonomic nomenclature is<br />
according to Tackholm (1974), and updated following<br />
Boulos (1995, <strong>1999</strong>).<br />
For each sampled stand, four soil samples were<br />
collected from profiles of 0-50 cm and pooled together<br />
to form one composite sample. Soil texture was de<br />
termined with the hydrometer method and CaC03 by<br />
Collin's calcimeter. Organic matter content and soil<br />
moisture were estimated by drying and then ignition at<br />
600°C for 3 hours. Soil-water extracts (1: 2.5) were<br />
prepared for the determination of electric conductivity<br />
and pH using conductivity-meter and pH-meter, re<br />
spectively.<br />
Stand-species data matrix was classified using the<br />
importance values of perennial species by Two-way<br />
indicator species analysis (TWINSPAN; Hill, 1979)<br />
(Table 2). Due to the relative paucity of most stands<br />
(generally between 5 and 14 species), classification by<br />
TWINSPAN was stopped at the third level so that the<br />
size of stands would demonstrate ecological meaning<br />
though their floristic structure. All the default settings<br />
were used for TWINSPAN, except the pseudo-species<br />
cut levels were altered to 0, 2, 5, 10,20,40,50,60 and<br />
80, and the number of indicator species was four per<br />
class.<br />
Canonical correspondence analysis (CANOCO: ter<br />
Braak, 1988 & 1990) was used for the same set of<br />
data. Rare species were downweighted to reduce dis<br />
tortion of the analysis. Detrended Correspondence<br />
Analysis (DCA: Hill & Gauch, 1980) was applied to<br />
check the magnitude of change in species composition<br />
along the first ordination axis (i.e. gradient length in<br />
standard deviation units). Direct gradient analysis,<br />
Canonical Correspondence Analysis (CCA) were used<br />
in order to examine the relationships between the floristic<br />
composition of the sampled stands and the esti<br />
mated soil variables. An exploratory CCA was<br />
performed using all studied edaphic variables, fol<br />
lowed by a CCA with forward selection. The CCA<br />
with forward selection was evaluated by examining<br />
the canonical coefficients (significance assessed by<br />
approximate t-tests) and the intraset correlations (ter<br />
Braak, 1986).<br />
175
Abd El-Ghani Soil variables affecting the vegetation ofinland western desert ofEgypt<br />
Station<br />
Mersa Matruh<br />
Siwa<br />
Dakhla<br />
Temperature (QC)<br />
Mean Min Mean Max<br />
12.4 24.7<br />
4.1 38.0<br />
5.8 39.3<br />
Relative Humidity (%)<br />
Mean Min Mean Max<br />
51 67<br />
42 61<br />
19 42<br />
Rainfall<br />
(mm annuar l )<br />
144.0<br />
9.6<br />
0.7<br />
Evaporation<br />
(mm daft)<br />
8.3<br />
11.5<br />
18.4<br />
Table I. Climatic characteristics (average 1931-1978) of three stations distributed in the study area (after Zahran, 1972; Zahran &<br />
Willis, 1992)<br />
TWINSPAN group I 11 III IV V VI VII VIII<br />
Group size 7 16 45 19 5 23 24 5<br />
Prosopis farcta (P fr) 121 2 1<br />
Phoenix dactylifera (P df) 15 9 5<br />
Calotropis procera (C pr) 1 12 1<br />
Tamarix nilotica (T ni) 30 109 19 4 23 6 1<br />
Stipagrostis plumosa (S pi) 2 6 3 6 I 9<br />
Pulicaria incisa (P cr) 1 1 I 12 4 8 5<br />
Heliotropium digynum (H dg) 5 I 7 3 2 4<br />
Alhagi graecorum (A gr) 77 22 2 3 2<br />
Citrullus colocynthis (C cl) 1 2 2 I<br />
Fagonia bruguieri (F br) 1 9 3<br />
Zygophyllum album (Z al) 12 4<br />
Traganum nudatum (T nd) 1 2<br />
/mperata cylindrica (I cy) 5 1<br />
Nitraria retusa (N rt) 11 1<br />
Launaea nudicaulis (L nu) 5 2<br />
Hyoscyamus muticus (H mu) 1 I<br />
Zygophyllum coccineum (Z co) 8 69 14 5 4 5<br />
Salsola imbricata subsp. imbricata (S im) 18 62 10<br />
Cornulaca monacantha (C mo) 1 15 142 5<br />
Fagonia arabica (F ar) 1 I 71 5 6 1<br />
Pulicaria crispa (P cr) 36 4 2 5<br />
Monsonia nivea (M nv) 2 1 3 2 I<br />
Fagonia indica (F in) 4<br />
Sarcocorniafruticosa (S fr) 1<br />
Calligonum polygonoides subsp. comosum (Ccm) 1 3 1<br />
Zilla spinosa subsp. spinosa (Z sp) 10 2 9 4 2<br />
Acacia tortilis subsp. raddiana (A rd) 1 19 6 2<br />
Astragalus trigonus (A tr) 3 2 3 2 2<br />
Anabasis articulata (A ar) 3 13 14 1 15<br />
Atriplex leucoclada (A lu) 109 4 2<br />
Herniaria hemistemon (H he) I<br />
Deverra tortuosa (D tr) 14 39 86<br />
Randonia africana (R af) 107 26 19<br />
Carduncellus mareoticus (C mr) 2 14<br />
Farsetia aegyptia (F ag) 3 1<br />
Capparis spinosa var. aegyptia (C sp) 12 96 75<br />
Zilla spinosa subsp. biparmata (Z bi) 3 7 33<br />
Helianthemum lippii (H 1p) 1 1 6<br />
Salsola villosa (S vr) 4 2<br />
Ephedra alata (E a1) 3<br />
Table 2. Species composition of the 144 stands in the two transects, arranged in order of occurrence in the eight TWINSPAN<br />
groups. Entries in bold are characteristic species in each group. Species abbreviations displayed in Figures 2, 3 and 5 are given<br />
between parentheses.<br />
176 ecologia <strong>mediterranea</strong> <strong>25</strong> (2) - /999
Abd El-Ghani Soil variables affecting the vegetation ofinland western desert ofEgypt<br />
Soil variable TWINSPAN groups F- ratio P<br />
I 11 III IV V VI VII VIII<br />
EC (mS cm-I) 0.5±0.3 2.8±0.7 0.8±0.9 0.9±0.7 2.2±0.2 0.7±0.7 0.5±0.3 1.1±0.9 19.0 0.0001<br />
pH 8.0±0.6 8.8±0.4 7.9±0.5 7.9±0.4 7.7±0.5 7.7±0.5 7.9±0.4 7.6±0.4 1.3 0.3<br />
CaC0 3 (%) 9.6±2.6 11.3±4.9 15.0±5.8 13.5±5.3 21.0±8.1 14.8±6.0 15.1±5.5 19.1±3.8 4.6 0.0001<br />
MC (%) 1.5±0.3 2.0±0.6 2.12±0.7 2.3±0.5 2.5±0.2 2.6±0.8 2.9±0.7 3.3±0.7 5.4 0.0001<br />
OM(%) 1.5±0.2 0.3±0.4 0.21±0.3 0.2±0.3 0.1±0.1 0.1±0.1 O.I±O.I 0.1±0.06 29.5 0.0001<br />
Sand (%) 93.5±1.0 93.3±1.8 94.5±4.1 92.4±2.0 91.2±0.9 91.5±1.0 88.4±16.9 90.4±0.9 12.5 0.0001<br />
Silt + clay (%) 6.5±1.4 6.7±1.8 5.5±2.1 7.6±2.0 8.8±0.9 8.4±1.0 11.6±1.1 9.6±1.0 8.6 0.0001<br />
Table 3. Mean values, standard deviation errors and ANOVA F values of the soil variables in the stands supporting the 8 vegetation<br />
groups obtained by TWINSPAN. EC =electric conductivity, CaC0 3 =calcium carbonate, MC =moisture content and<br />
OM = organic matter<br />
Eigenvalues<br />
DCA<br />
CCA<br />
Species-environment<br />
correlation coefficients<br />
DCA<br />
CCA<br />
1<br />
0.830<br />
0.474<br />
0.724<br />
0_781<br />
Axis<br />
2<br />
0.496<br />
0.376<br />
0.468<br />
0.871<br />
3<br />
0.377<br />
0.292<br />
0.409<br />
0.658<br />
Table 4. Comparison of the results of ordination by DCA and CCA: eigenvalues and species-environment correlation coefficients<br />
for the first three axes are demonstrated<br />
Canonical coefficient Intra-set correlations<br />
Soil variables Axis I Axis 2 Axis 3 Axis I Axis 2 Axis 3<br />
EC -0.48* 0.88* 0.01 -0.50 0.85 0.35<br />
pH -0.13 -0.16* -0.10 -0.22 0.07 0.06<br />
CaC03 -0.08 0.02 -0.21 0.06 -0.08 -0.37<br />
MC 0.28* 0.09 0.10 0.49 -0.10 0.24<br />
OM -0.33* -0.19* 0.88* -0.41 -0.28 0.85<br />
Sand 0.12 -0.06 0.01 -0.09 -0.07 0.005<br />
Silt + clay 0.53* 0.29* 0.<strong>25</strong> 0.67 0.53 0.27<br />
Table 5. Canonical coefficients and the intra-set correlations of soil variables with the first three axes of CCA<br />
* = t-values > 2.3 (only indicative of coefficient strength)<br />
EC =electric conductivity, CaC03 =calcium carbonate, MC =moisture content and OM =organic matter<br />
The exploratory CCA was evaluated using the intraset<br />
correlations, since the canonical coefficients<br />
were unstable due to inclusion of highly correlated<br />
variables.<br />
Eight soil variables were included: electric conductivity,<br />
pH, CaC03 , soil moisture, organic matter,<br />
sand, silt and clay. The significance of differences<br />
between the different vegetation groups, as to their<br />
edaphic variables, was tested by ANOVA. CCA axes<br />
were evaluated statistically by means of a Monte<br />
ecologia <strong>mediterranea</strong> <strong>25</strong> (2) - <strong>1999</strong><br />
Carlo permutation test (ter Braak, 1988). All the statistical<br />
techniques were according to student SYSTAT<br />
software (STUSTATW 5: Berk, 1994).<br />
RESULTS<br />
Sixty plant species related to 19 families of the angiosperms<br />
and one of the gymnosperms were recorded<br />
in this study. They constituted 40 perennial and 20 annual<br />
species: Cruciferae and Chenopodiaceae (13.3%<br />
177
Abd EI-Ghani Soil variables affecting the vegetation ofinland western desert ofEgvpt<br />
each), Zygophyllaceae (11.7%), Caryophyllaceae,<br />
Compositae and Leguminosae (10.0% each), while the<br />
other 14 families share 31.7%. Chamaephytes are the<br />
most abundant life form and constituted 40.0% of the<br />
total flora of the study area, followed by therophytes<br />
(33.3%), hemicryptophytes (15.0%) and phanero<br />
phytes (11.7%). The most common perennials re<br />
corded were: Prosopis farcta, Tamarix nilotica,<br />
Fagonia arabica, Zygophyllum coccineum, Salsola<br />
imbricata subsp. imbicata, Cornulaca monacantha,<br />
Alhagi graecorum, Atriplex leucoclada, Randonia af<br />
ricana, Deverra tortuosa and Capparis spinosa var.<br />
aegyptia may be considered as leading dominants and<br />
characteristic species. Each of these species attains a<br />
maximum importance value (IV) of more than 140<br />
(out of 300 for all species in a stand), and a mean of<br />
more than 60. Common but less important perennials<br />
are Phoenix dactylifera, Pulicaria crispa, Anabasis<br />
articulata, Zilla spinosa subsp. spinosa, Stipagrostis<br />
plumosa and Pulicaria incisa. Common annuals in<br />
clude: Trigonella stellata, Zygophyllum simplex, Co<br />
tula cinerea, Eremobium aegyptiacum, Schouwia<br />
thebaica and Paronychia arabica subsp. arabica.<br />
The 144 stands were classified into eight vegeta<br />
tion groups according to TWINSPAN technique (Fig<br />
ure 2). The first level of the dendrogram separates all<br />
the stands into two main groups. The first group com<br />
prises 57 stands found mainly in the northern transect,<br />
and the second comprises 87 stands sampled from<br />
both transects. Table 3 summarises the mean values<br />
and the standard deviations of the measured soil vari<br />
ables in the eight groups derived from TWINSPAN.<br />
Generally, pH shows the least variation among<br />
groups. It can also be noted that whereas levels of<br />
lime and fine materials attain their highest values in<br />
the groups of the northern transect, the organic matter<br />
content reaches its highest levels in those of the south<br />
ern transect.<br />
The identified vegetation groups are named after<br />
the characteristic species as follows: Prosopis farcta<br />
Tamarix nilotica (lower part of the southern transect<br />
in the vicinity of the lowlands of Dakhla Oasis);<br />
Tamarix nilotica-Alhagi graecorum (southern tran<br />
sect, high salinity levels favour the growth of some<br />
halophytic species, e.g. Nitraria retusa and Zygo<br />
phyllum album); Zygophyllum coccineum-Salsola imbricata<br />
subsp. imbricata (in runnels and depressions<br />
of the southern transect); Cornulaca monacantha<br />
Fagonia arabica (larger catchment areas of the north-<br />
178<br />
ern transect, some species of this group do not pene<br />
trate into other groups of the southern transect);<br />
Atriplex leucoclada (lower part of the northern tran<br />
sect); Randonia africana-Deverra tortuosa (the silty<br />
runnels, and occupying a distance of about 20 km of<br />
the middle part of the northern transect); Deverra<br />
tortuosa-Capparis spinosa var. aegyptia (occupying a<br />
distance of about 30 km in the upper stretches of the<br />
middle part of the northern transect); Capparis spi<br />
nosa var. aegyptia-Zilla spinosa subsp. biparmata (in<br />
the low depressions between km 185 and km 198<br />
along the lower part of the northern transect).<br />
The four DCA axes explain 11.7%, 7.0%, 5.3%<br />
and 3.4% of the total variation in the species data, re<br />
spectively. This low percentage of variance explained<br />
by the axes is attributed to the many zero values in the<br />
vegetation data set. Table 4 shows that the eigenvalue<br />
for the first DCA axis was high indicating that it cap<br />
tured the greater proportion of the variation in species<br />
composition among stands, but the species<br />
environment correlation coefficients were low for<br />
DCA axes.<br />
DCA ordination of the perennial species (Figure 3)<br />
shows that species with high positive scores on axis I<br />
are found mainly in stands of the southern transect,<br />
and ordinated close to the right end-point: Prosopis<br />
farcta, Phoenix dactylifera, Nitraria retusa, Sarcocor<br />
nia fruticosa and Imperata cylindrica. The species po<br />
sitioned on the other end of this axis include:<br />
Capparis spinosa var. aegyptia (negative end), De<br />
verra tortuosa, Randonia africana, Ephedra alata and<br />
Helianthemum lippii. These and many other species<br />
are commonly found in the upper and middle parts of<br />
the northern transect. In the centre of axis I there are<br />
many species found throughout the investigated area<br />
with no preference to any geographical aspect (e.g.<br />
Zygophyllum coccineum, Tamarix nilotica, Alhagi<br />
graecorum, Fagonia arabica and Cornulaca monacantha).<br />
Along axis 2, species with high positive<br />
scores include: Atriplex leucoclada and Zilla spinosa<br />
subsp. biparmata. These species are recorded from the<br />
lower part of the northern transect, whereas species on<br />
the other end are of common occurrence in the middle<br />
and upper parts. To compare the classification and<br />
DCA ordination results, the recognised eight<br />
TWINSPAN groups are superimposed. Significance<br />
correlations of soil variables with the first four DCA<br />
axes (results not shown) revealed greater correlations<br />
along axis I than the higher order axes.<br />
ecalogia <strong>mediterranea</strong> <strong>25</strong> (2) - <strong>1999</strong>
Abd El-Ghani Soil variables affecting the vegetation ofinland western desert ofEgypt<br />
and salinity, while the second axis was defined by salinity<br />
and organic matter content. This fact is also evi<br />
dent in the ordination diagrams (Figures 4 & 5).<br />
Contribution of salinity, fine sediments, organic mat<br />
ter and moisture content, as indicated by the forward<br />
selection in the CCA program, to the variation in spe<br />
cies data were 29.4%, 29.0%, 22.1 % and 11.3%, re<br />
spectively.<br />
CCA ordination diagram for the species scores and<br />
canonical coefficients scores of the soil variables is<br />
presented in Figure 4. Three species grouping are evi<br />
dent. The first was highly associated with organic<br />
matter and sand, and includes species such as Proso<br />
pis farcta, Salsola imbricata subsp. imbricata, Fagonia<br />
bruguieri, Zygophyllum coccineum and Cornulaca<br />
monacantha. The corresponding TWINSPAN groups<br />
were I, III and IV (Figure 5). A second group associ<br />
ated with salinity and pH and includes: Tamarix ni<br />
lotica, Alhagi graecorum, Nitraria retusa, Atriplex<br />
leucoclada and Calotropis procera. Vegetation groups<br />
located here are II and V. The third group was closely<br />
associated with moisture content, fine materials and<br />
lime. The associated vegetation groups are VI, VII and<br />
VIII, and include: Deverra tortuosa, Randonia afri<br />
cana, Zilla spinosa subsp. biparmata and Atriplex leu<br />
coclada.<br />
DISCUSSION<br />
The vegetation groups which resulted from the ap<br />
plication of TWINSPAN in the study area, may be<br />
related in its northern transect to the Salsolion tetrandrae<br />
of habitats with soils derived from chalks and<br />
marls and rich in gypsum and soluble salts and the<br />
Anabasion articulatae arenarium, Hammada<br />
Anabasion articulatae (Zohary, 1973), and Thy<br />
melaeion hirsutae (Tadros & Atta, 1958) of the pro<br />
gressively less saline habitats. The associations<br />
belonging to these alliances and their characteristic<br />
species have repeatedly been recorded as abundant in<br />
ecological studies of specific habitats in the western<br />
Mediterranean coastal region of Egypt (Migahid et aI.,<br />
1971), and in the north-western Negev, Israel (Tielb6rger,<br />
1997). TWINSPAN groups of the southern<br />
transect can be inferred to the alliance Zygophyllion<br />
coccinei (El-Sharkawy et al., 1984) with their charac<br />
teristic species are commonly recorded in the communities<br />
of the southern part of the Western Desert of<br />
Egypt (El-Hadidi, 1980b; Boulos, 1982). According to<br />
180<br />
the detailed phytosociological survey by Bornkamm<br />
and Kehl (1990), they suggested one new order: Pi<br />
turanthetalia tortuosi to comprise all the plant com<br />
munities of the Western Desert of Egypt. Within this<br />
order the northern communities can be attributed to<br />
the alliance Thymelaeion hirsutae (Eig, 1946) and the<br />
southern one to the alliance Zygophyllion coccinei.<br />
The results obtained in this study largely corroborate<br />
the latter suggestion. Whereas some species, e.g.,<br />
Atriplex leucoclada, Deverra tortuosa, Randonia afri<br />
cana, Capparis spinosa var. aegyptia and Zilla spi<br />
nosa subsp. biparmata are confined to the northern<br />
transect, and Prosopis farcta, Fagonia bruguieri, Tra<br />
ganum nudatum and Salsola imbricata subsp. imbricata<br />
to the southern one, some other species exhibit<br />
wide ecological amplitude of tolerance through their<br />
distribution in both transects. Consequently, it can be<br />
suggested that the vegetation of the study area repre<br />
sents a gradual transition from the southern Nubian<br />
communities (of the Nubian Desert sensu El-Hadidi,<br />
1980a) in the south-western part to those characteristic<br />
of the northern Mediterranean coast (Libyan Desert<br />
sensu El-Hadidi, 1980a). The transitional character is<br />
clearly indicated by the fact that a group of species<br />
reaches its southern limit, and another group reaches<br />
its northern limit of distribution.<br />
The habitat investigated in this study is a relatively<br />
simple one, in which the species have to withstand<br />
harsh environmental conditions. This is not only re<br />
flected by the preponderance of annuals, but also by<br />
the presence of several highly-adapted, drought<br />
resistant species (Abdel-Razik et aI., 1984). In this re<br />
spect, the vegetation along the two studied transects is<br />
similar to that of gorges (karkurs) of Gebel Uweinat<br />
and some neighbouring areas of south-western Egypt<br />
(Boulos, 1982; Bornkamm, 1986). A major difference<br />
between the two corresponding habitat types is the<br />
high degree of scarceness of precipitation which may<br />
fall once every seven to ten years in Uweinat, and up<br />
to twenty years or more in Gilf Kebir and the neigh<br />
bouring areas. The vegetation cover of the latter land<br />
scape is less than 1% in the extreme desert (Stahr et<br />
aI., 1985). Thus, often just one species reaches domi<br />
nance forming monotypic stands. However, mono<br />
dominant stands in this study are not as common as<br />
those codominated by more than one species.<br />
Along gradients of decreasing precipitation, vegetation<br />
varies from grasslands to shrublands (Westoby,<br />
1980).<br />
ecologia <strong>mediterranea</strong> <strong>25</strong> (2) - <strong>1999</strong>
Abd El-Ghani Soil variables affecting the vegetation ofinland western desert ofEgypt<br />
The relative advantage of shrubs over grasses when<br />
water is limiting, as in the study area, can be explained<br />
by their extensive root systems which are capable to<br />
utilise water stored in different soil depths, whereas<br />
grasses utilise the transient water stored in the upper<br />
soil synchronic with precipitation pulses. The upper<br />
dry layer of the surface deposits acts as a protective<br />
layer, moisture is stored in subsurface layers, and the<br />
underlying sandstone provides added water storage<br />
capacity. The presence of a subsurface layer that is<br />
permanently wet is well-known phenomenon in the<br />
Egyptian Deserts (Kassas & Batanouny, 1984). As<br />
presented in the results, the dominance of shrubby<br />
plant species over the grasses is evident.<br />
Chamaephytes constitute 40% of the floristic compo<br />
sition, followed by therophytes. The dominance of<br />
both chamaephytes and therophytes over other life<br />
forms seem to be a response to the hot dry climate and<br />
human and animal interferences. A comparison of the<br />
life-form spectrum of the same 5° of the northern<br />
latitude in the corresponding Eastern Desert of Egypt<br />
(<strong>25</strong>°N - 30 0<br />
N), Abd EI-Ghani (1998) showed more<br />
therophytes (38.3%) and hemicryptophytes (22.0%)<br />
and less chamaephytes (29.0%).<br />
The vegetation that characterise the study area can<br />
be divided, according to TWINSPAN technique, into<br />
eight vegetation groups: Prosopis farcta-Tamarix nilotica,<br />
Tamarix nilotica-Alhagi graecorum, Zygo<br />
phyllum coccineum-Salsola imbricata subsp.<br />
imbricata, Cornulaca monacantha-Fagonia arabica,<br />
Atriplex leucoclada, Randonia africana-Deverra tor<br />
tuosa, Deverra tortuosa-Capparis spinosa var. aegyp<br />
tia and Capparis spinosa var. aegyptia-Zilla spinosa<br />
subsp. biparmata. Some species: Atriplex leucoclada,<br />
Anabasis articulata, Capparis spinosa var. aegyptia<br />
and Randonia africana common to the western Medi<br />
terranean coastal belt (Ayyad & Ammar, 1974; Abdel<br />
Razik et aI., 1984) are found in the less arid sites of<br />
the northern transect where the silty soil decreases<br />
water infiltration. A group of salt-tolerant plants in<br />
cluding Nitraria retusa, Tamarix nilotica, Sarcocornia<br />
fruticosa and Alhagi graecorum are found in the dry<br />
saline sites of the southern transect, and form phyto<br />
genic mounds of variable size. Alhagi graecorum is a<br />
widely distributed species that seems to grow in dif<br />
ferent habitats (Kassas, 1952). It is also considered as<br />
a groundwater-indicating plant (Girgis, 1972). According<br />
to Kassas and Girgis (1965), the growth of the<br />
desert scrub Nitraria retusa represents the highest tol-<br />
182<br />
erance to soil salinity conditions, and a penultimate<br />
stage in the successional development. The plant<br />
reaches its northernmost limit of distribution around<br />
Qara Oasis on the south-western edge of Qattara Depression<br />
(Abd EI-Ghani, 1992) as well as in Bahariya<br />
Oasis (Abd EI-Ghani, 1981). Nitraria retusa, how<br />
ever, has not been recorded beyond Latitude 28°N in<br />
Egypt (M. Kassas, pers. comm.). Further studies con<br />
cerning the distribution of this plant in the country is<br />
recommended. Prosopis farcta, Imperata cylindrica<br />
and Salsola imbricata subsp. imbricata are commonly<br />
found in the dry sandy plains along the southern tran<br />
sect. Restriction of Imperata to the high sandy plains<br />
is apparently due to the inability of this species to<br />
reach the capillary fringe of the groundwater which is<br />
fairly close to the surface (Rikli, 1943). The species is<br />
considered as facultative halophyte mainly occurring<br />
on sandy soil with slight salt content. Thus, this habi<br />
tat may represent a transitional zone between the less<br />
arid and dry saline habitats. The xero-psammophytes<br />
Fagonia arabica, Cornulaca monacantha, Zilla spi<br />
nosa subsp. spinosa, Calligonum polygonoides subsp.<br />
comosum, Pulicaria incisa, Citrullus colocynthis and<br />
Heliotropium digynum were found in dry non-saline<br />
sandy sites along both transects where infiltration is<br />
higher and water accumulated in deeper layers, and<br />
the soil is highly fertile. This group of species are<br />
more widely distributed in Egypt and neighbouring<br />
countries (Batanouny, 1979; Zahran & Willis, 1992;<br />
Frankenberg & Klaus, 1980; Wojterski, 1985).<br />
Ayyad (1976) pointed out that physiographic and<br />
edaphic factors have greatly affected the distribution<br />
of plant communities in the Western Desert of Egypt.<br />
DCA and CCA analyses of the vegetation and soil<br />
data in the present study indicated the relative posi<br />
tions of species and sites along the most important<br />
ecological gradients. DCA axis 1 may represent a<br />
geographical trend in the floristic data set. The main<br />
reason for this may be a gradient in the local harsh<br />
climate within the study area. Both ordination tech<br />
niques emphasised that salinity, fine sediments, or<br />
ganic matter and moisture content are the significant<br />
factors controlling the distribution of the vegetation in<br />
this region. This has been reported in other studies<br />
such as those of EI-Ghareeb and Hassan (1989), El<br />
Demerdash et al. (1995) and Shaltout et aI., (1997).<br />
The soil texture gradient in arid desert environments<br />
results in a corresponding gradient of available soil<br />
moisture. Therefore, moisture content is probably one<br />
ecologia <strong>mediterranea</strong> <strong>25</strong> (2) - <strong>1999</strong>
Abd El-Ghani Soil variables affecting the vegetation ofinland western desert ofEgypt<br />
of the most effective physical factors leading to vege<br />
tation variations from north to the south of the study<br />
area. The organic matter content plays an important<br />
role as a key element in soil fertility. Sharaf El Din<br />
and Shaltout (1985), and Abd EI-Ghani (1998) indi<br />
cated the role of soil organic matter in the Egyptian<br />
arid desert ecosystems.<br />
Acknowledgements<br />
This study would not have been possible without<br />
the support of the "Alexander von Humboldt-Stiftung,<br />
Germany" for which I am extremely grateful. The<br />
following people and institutions are acknowledged<br />
with appreciation for their contribution: R. Bornk<br />
amm, F. Alaily, H. Kehl, F. Darius (all TU-Berlin) for<br />
their continuous support, fruitful discussions and<br />
valuable information on the soil structure; Institut flir<br />
Mathematik und Informatik (Freie Universitiit-Berlin)<br />
for statistics and many other facilities; S. EI-Banna<br />
(Department of Lands & Underground Water Re<br />
sources, Cairo University) for confirming and com<br />
menting on the soil analysis and S. T. Michael for his<br />
kind assistance in soil analysis. I thank two anony<br />
mous referees for their keen revision and suggestions<br />
to improve an earlier version of this paper.<br />
REFERENCES<br />
Abd EI-Ghani M.M., 1981. Preliminary studies on the<br />
vegetation ofBahariya Oasis, Egypt. Unpublished M.Sc.<br />
Thesis, Cairo University. 309 p.<br />
Abd EI-Ghani M.M., 1985. Comparative study of the vegetation<br />
of Bahariya and Farafra Oases and the Faiyum<br />
region, Egypt. Unpublished Ph.D. Thesis, Cairo University.<br />
464 p.<br />
Abd EI-Ghani M.M., 1992. Flora and vegetation of Qara<br />
Oasis, Egypt. Phytocoenologia, 21: 1-14.<br />
Abd EI-Ghani M.M., 1998. Environmental correlates of species<br />
distribution in arid desert ecosystems of eastern<br />
Egypt. J. Arid. Environ., 38: 297-313.<br />
Abdel-Razik M., Abdel-Aziz M. & Ayyad M., 1984. Environmental<br />
gradients and species distribution in a transect<br />
at Omayed (Egypt). J. Arid. Environ., 7: 337-352.<br />
Alaily F., Bornkamm R., Blume H.-P., Kehl R. & Zielinski<br />
H., 1987. Ecological investigations in the Gilf Kebir<br />
(SW- Egypt). Phytocoenologia, 15: 1-20.<br />
Ayyad M., 1976. The vegetation and environment of the<br />
western Mediterranean coastal land of Egypt. IV. The<br />
habitat of non-saline depressions. J. Ecol., 64: 713-722.<br />
Ayyad M. & Ammar M.Y., 1974. Vegetation and environment<br />
of the western Mediterranean coastal land of<br />
Egypt. n. The habitat of inland ridges. J. Ecol., 62: 509<br />
523.<br />
ecologia <strong>mediterranea</strong> <strong>25</strong> (2) - <strong>1999</strong><br />
Batanouny K.H., 1979. The desert vegetation in Egypt.<br />
Cairo Univ. Afr. Rev., Special Publ., I: 9-37.<br />
Berk K.N., 1994. Data analysis with Student SYSTAT Windows<br />
Edition. Course Technology, Inc.<br />
Bornkamm R, 1986. Flora and vegetation of some small<br />
oases in S-Egypt. Phytocoenologia, 14: 275-284.<br />
Bornkamm R., 1987. Growth of accidental vegetation on<br />
desert soils in SW Egypt. Catena, 14: 267-274.<br />
Bornkamm R. & Kehl H., 1990. The plant communities of<br />
the western desert of Egypt. Phytocoenologia, 19: 149<br />
231.<br />
Boulos L., 1982. Flora of Gebel Uweinat and some neighbouring<br />
regions of south-western Egypt. Candollea, 37:<br />
<strong>25</strong>7-276.<br />
Boulos L., 1995. Flora ofEgypt. Check list. Al Hadara Publishing,<br />
Cairo. 283 p.<br />
Boulos L., <strong>1999</strong>. Flora of Egypt. vol.l. Al Hadara Publishing,<br />
Cairo. 417 p.<br />
Canfield R., 1941. Application of the line interception<br />
method in sampling range vegetation. 1. Forest., 39:<br />
288-294.<br />
Eig A., 1946. Synopsis of the phytosociological units of Palestine.<br />
J. Bot. Jerusalem Ser., 3 (I): 2<strong>25</strong>-312.<br />
EI-Demerdash M.A., Hegazy A.K. & Zailay A.M., 1995.<br />
Vegetation-soil relationships in Tihamah coastal plains<br />
of Jazan region, Saudi Arabia. J. Arid. Environ., 30:<br />
161-174.<br />
EI-Ghareeb R & Hassan LA., 1989. A phytosociological<br />
study on the inland desert plateau of the Western Desert<br />
of Egypt at EI-Hammam. J. Arid Environ., 17: 13-21.<br />
EI-Hadidi M.N., 1980a. An outline of the planned flora of<br />
Egypt. Taeckholmia. Add. Ser., I: 1-12.<br />
EI-Hadidi M.N., 1980b. Vegetation of the Nubian Desert.<br />
In: Wendorf F. & Schild R. (eds), Prehistory ofthe eastern<br />
Sahara. Academic Press, New York: 345-351.<br />
EI-Sharkawy H.M., Fayed A.A. & Salama F.M., 1984.<br />
Vegetation of inland desert wadis in Egypt. V. Wadi<br />
Qassab. Feddes Repert., 95: 561-570.<br />
Emberger L., 1955. Une classification biogeographique des<br />
climats. Recueil de Travaux des Laboratoires de Botanique,<br />
Geologie et Zoologie de la Faculte des Sciences<br />
de l'Universite de Montpellier, 7: 3-43.<br />
Frankenberg P. & Klaus D., 1980. Atlas der pflanzenwelt<br />
des Nordafricanischen Trockenraums. Arheit. Geogr.<br />
Inst. (Univ. Bonn), A133: 1-237.<br />
Girgis W.A., 1972. Plant indicators in the Egyptian deserts.<br />
Desert. Inst. Bu ll., A.R.E., 21: 511-5<strong>25</strong>.<br />
Haines RW., 1951. Potential annuals of the Egyptian Desert.<br />
Bull. Inst. Des. Egypte, 1(2): 103-118.<br />
Hill M.O.,1979. TWINSPAN - A FORTRAN program Fir<br />
arranging multivariate data in an ordered two-way table<br />
of classification of individuals and attributes. Ithaca.<br />
NY, Cornell University. 90 p.<br />
Hill M.O. & Gauch H.G., 1980. Detrended Correspondence<br />
Analysis: An improved ordination technique. Vegetatio,<br />
42: 47-58.<br />
Kassas M., 1952. On the distribution of Alhagi maurorum in<br />
Egypt. Proc. Egypt. Acad. Sci., 8: 140-151.<br />
Kassas, M., 1966. Plant life in deserts. In: Hills E.S. (ed.),<br />
Arid Lands. UNESCO, London, Mathuen/Paris. p. 145<br />
180<br />
183
Abd EI-Glwni Soil variables affecting the vegetation ofinland western desert ofEgypt<br />
Kassas, M., 1971. Die Pflanzenwelt. 2.Teil, Pflanzenleben in<br />
der ostlichen Sahara. In: Schiffers H. (ed.), Die Sahara<br />
wzd ihre Randgebiete. I. Physiogeographie. Weltforum<br />
Verlag, Munchen : 477-497.<br />
Kassas M. & Batanouny K.H., 1984. Plant Ecology. In:<br />
Cloudsley-Thompson J.L. (ed.), Sahara Desert. Pergamon<br />
Press, Oxford: 77-90.<br />
Kassas M. & Girgis W.A., 1965. Habitat and plant communities<br />
in the Egyptian desert. VI. The units of a desert<br />
ccosystem. J. Ecol., 53: 715-728.<br />
Migahid A.M., Batanouny KH. & Zaki M.A.F., 1971. Phytosociological<br />
and ecological study of a sector in the<br />
Mediterranean coastal region in Egypt. Vegetatio, 23:<br />
113-134.<br />
Monod Th., 1954. Mode contracte et diffus de la vegetation<br />
saharienne. In: Cloudsley-Thompson J.L., (ed.), Biology<br />
ofDesert. Institute of Biology, London: 35-44.<br />
Rikli M., 1943. Das Pjlanzenkleid der Mittelmeerliinder.<br />
Band I. Verlag-Huber, Berlin. 436 p.<br />
Schiffers H., 1971. Allgemines. In: Schiffers H., (ed.), Die<br />
Sahara wzd ihre Randgebiet. l. Phytogeographie. Weltforum-Verlag,<br />
Munchen: 19-36.<br />
Shaltout K.H., EI-Halawany E.F. & EI-Garawany M.M..<br />
1997. Coastal lowland vegetation of eastern Saudi Arabia.<br />
Biodiv. Conserv., 6: 1027-1040.<br />
Sharaf El Din A. & Shaltout KH., 1985. On the phytosociology<br />
of Wadi Araba in the Eastern Desert of Egypt.<br />
Proc. Eg.vpt Bot. Soc., 4: 1311-13<strong>25</strong>.<br />
Springuel I. 1997. Vegetation, land use and conservation in<br />
the south eastern Egypt. In: Barakat H.N. & Hegazy<br />
A.K. (eds). Reviews in Ecology: Desert Conservation<br />
and De\'elopment. Metropole, Cairo: 177-206.<br />
Springuel I., Sheded M. & Abed W., 1990. Plant growth in<br />
relation to a rain incident in Wadi Agag, south Egypt.<br />
Vegetatio, 90: 159-165.<br />
Stahr K., Bornkamm R., Gauer J. & Kehl H., 1985. Die<br />
Veranderung von Boden und Vegetation am Obergang<br />
von Halbwuste zur Vollwuste zwischen Mittelmeer und<br />
184<br />
Quattara-Depression in Agypten. Geookodynamik, 6:<br />
99-120.<br />
Tackholm V., 1974. Students' Flora of Eg:"pt (2 nd Edn.).<br />
Cairo University Press, Cairo. 888p.<br />
Tadros T.M. & Atta B.M., 1958. Further contribution to the<br />
sociology and ecology of halophilous communities of<br />
Mareotis (Egypt). Vegetatio, 8: 137-160.<br />
ter Braak C.J.F., 1986. Canonical correspondence analysis: a<br />
new eigenvector technique for multivariate direct gradient<br />
analysis. Ecology, 67: 1167-1179.<br />
ter Braak c.J.F., 1988. CANOCO - A FORTRAN program<br />
or canonical community ordination bv [partial] [detrended]<br />
[canonicall correspondence analysis, principal<br />
components analysis and redundancy anal.vsis, Version<br />
2.1., Agricultural Mathematics Group, Wageningen. 95<br />
p.<br />
ter Braak c.J.F., 1990. Update notes: CANOCO version 3.1.<br />
Agricultural Mathematics Group, Wageningen. 35 p.<br />
Thomas D.S.G., 1988. The biogeomorphology of arid and<br />
semi-arid environments. In: Viles H.A. (ed.), Biogeomorpholog}'.<br />
Basil B1ackwelL Oxford: 193-221<br />
Tielborger K, 1997. The vegetation of linear desert dunes in<br />
the north-western Negev, Israel. Flora, 192: 261-278.<br />
WaIter H. & Breckle S.-W., 1984. Okologie der Erde, Band<br />
2. Spezielle Okologie der Tropischen und Subtropischen<br />
Zonen. Gustav Fischer, Stuttgart. 461 p.<br />
Westoby M., 1980. Elements of a theory of vegetation dynamics<br />
in arid rangelands. Israel 1. Bot., 28: 169-194.<br />
Wojterski T.W., 1985. Guide de I'excursion internationale<br />
de phytosociologie Algirie du Nord. Goltze, Gottingen.<br />
274 p.<br />
Zahran M.A., 1972. On the ecology of Siwa Oasis, Egypt.<br />
Egypt. J. Bot., 15(2): 223-242.<br />
Zahran M.A. & Willis, A.J., 1992. The Vegetation ofEgypt.<br />
Chapman & Hall, London. 424 p.<br />
Zohary M., 1973. Geobotanical Foundations of the Middle<br />
East. 2 vols, Gustav Fischer-Verlag, Stuttgart. 739 p.<br />
ecologia <strong>mediterranea</strong> <strong>25</strong> (2) - <strong>1999</strong>
Besso!l et al.<br />
ABRIDGED ENGLISH VERSION<br />
Ccllulose represents a considerable part of the organic<br />
matter and StifJa tellocissimo content ranges from 42 to 50%.<br />
Thus, thc degradation of cellulose is a good indicator of the<br />
biological activity of an ecosystem.<br />
The aim of this study was to measure the microbial<br />
fauna activity and specially cellulolytic activity. in two alfa<br />
steppes corresponding to a gradient of aridity, and study the<br />
effects of the alfa rhizosphere and depth level on this activity.<br />
All cxpcriments were conducted ill vitro at different<br />
temperature and moisture levels.<br />
Thc study area is located in the western high plains of<br />
Algcria, where Stipa tenacissimo is a perennial tussock<br />
grass. The most productive rangelands of the region have<br />
been degraded by successive dry years and increasing grazing<br />
pressurc. Local climate is semi-arid at Rogassa station<br />
and arid at Mekalis. The mean annual rainfall in the region<br />
studied only reaches 200 - 300 mm with high variability.<br />
Other characteristics of this zone have been summarised in<br />
tables I and 2.<br />
Soil samples were collected in each station underneath<br />
and bctween several tufts of alfa, at different depths. To es-<br />
INTRODUCTION<br />
La degradation de la cellulose est reconnue comme<br />
un bon indicateur de l'activite biologique des sols<br />
(Dommergues & Mangenot, 1970; Berg & Roswall,<br />
1973; Labroue & Lascombes, 1975; Roze, 1986).<br />
Les steppes a alfa du Sud-Oranais (Algerie) sont en<br />
voie de degradation tres rapide. Entre 1978 et 1990, la<br />
phytomasse verte de I'alfa est passee de 1750 a 75 kg<br />
Ms / ha selon Aidoud et Touffet (1996). Ces auteurs<br />
attribuent cette degradation essentiellement au surpa<br />
turage qui s'ajoute a plusieurs annees de secheresse<br />
successives (Djellouli, 1990). Dans ces milieux en<br />
voie de dcsertification, le taux de matiere organique<br />
dans le sol est considere comme I'un des attributs vi<br />
taux essentiels (Aronson et al., 1995) et sa reduction,<br />
un indicateur pertinent de desertification. La minerali<br />
sation de la matiere organique a ete prise comme in<br />
dice de l'activite microbiologique des sols (Djellali,<br />
1981) ; cependant, I' activite cellulolytique n' a pas fait<br />
I'objet d'etude particuliere. Afin de mieux compren<br />
dre le fonctionnement des sols de ce type de steppe, le<br />
present travail est une contribution al'evaluation de la<br />
cellulolyse dans les sols alfatiers. Notre objectif a ete<br />
de mettre au point un protocole selon la structure lo<br />
cale de I' espece dominante et le degre d' aridite. Dans<br />
ce but, deux stations situees dans des conditions eco<br />
logiques differentes ont ete choisies afin de mesurer<br />
186<br />
Activite ceLlulolytique in vitro de .1'01.1' de deux steppes cl alfcl d'Algerie<br />
timate the degradation rate of cellulose, a technique based<br />
on the in vitro degradation on filter papers was used. The<br />
disappearing of cellulose was determined by following the<br />
ponderal changes of the filter paper residues.<br />
The results (Figures 2 and 3) demonstrate that:<br />
- the intensity of degradation is higher in the semi-arid than<br />
in arid conditions. The higher contents in organic matter<br />
(plant biomass) and other nutrient as nitrogen, phosphorus<br />
and calcium (Table 2) in the semi-arid could explain this<br />
behaviour.<br />
- the cellulolytic activity decreases with depth, except under<br />
tufts of alfa which affect the distribution of micro-organisms<br />
along the profile.<br />
- the rate of cellulose degradation is more important under<br />
the tufts than between them in both studied sites. This is<br />
probably because most indicators of soil fertility (organic<br />
matter. total and available nitrogen. phosphorus and cations,<br />
number and activity of microbial and arthropod<br />
decomposers) are much higher in the soil under tufts than<br />
elsewhere, as previously shown by Noy-Meir (1985).<br />
les variations de I'activite cellulolytique et de verifier<br />
I'importance des effets des conditions ecologiques a<br />
differentes echelles spatiales.<br />
MATERIEL ET METHODES<br />
Stations<br />
L'etude a ete realisee sur les steppes d'alfa des<br />
hautes plaines du Sud-Oranais dans deux stations:<br />
la station de Rogassa se trouve a 1090 md'altitude<br />
au nord ouest d'EI Bayadh, sur un glacis de pente tres<br />
faible ; cette station se place dans I' etage bioclimati<br />
que semi-aride inferieur a hiver froid (Nedjraoui,<br />
1990). Le sol, sur croute calcaire (a environ 30 cm de<br />
profondeur), est de type brun calcaire et de texture sa<br />
blo-limoneuse. Il presente des elements grossiers et de<br />
nombreuses racines verticales et horizontales (Ned<br />
jraoui, 1990). Le recouvrement global de la vegetation<br />
(steppe a alfa pur) est de 55%, sa richesse specifique<br />
est de 29 taxons (Bessah, 1998) ;<br />
la station de Mekalis se situe a 36 km au nord de<br />
Aln Sefra, a 1300 m d' altitude. Elle repose sur un gla<br />
cis de pente tres faible, inferieure a2%. Elle est situee<br />
dans I' etage bioclimatique aride superieur, variante a<br />
hiver froid. Le sol a croute calcaire est assez profond<br />
(40 cm ou plus) et sa texture est essentiellement sa<br />
bleuse.<br />
ecologio <strong>mediterranea</strong> <strong>25</strong> (2) - /999
Bessah et al. Activite cellulolytique in vitro de sols de deux steppes Cl alfa d'Algerie<br />
L'activite cellulolytique a ete suivie in vitro selon<br />
le protocole suivant : dans des boites de Petri steriles<br />
on introduit environ 100 g de terre, sans tamisage pre<br />
alable. Le papier filtre servant de substrat cellulosique<br />
a ete humecte puis mis en sandwich entre deux cou<br />
ches de terre. Les boites ont ete mises aincuber a dif<br />
ferentes temperatures (5, 15 et 30° C) et humidites<br />
(5%, 15% et 30%). La perte d'eau appreciee par pesee<br />
a ete compensee periodiquement par l'apport d'eau<br />
distillee. Apres 90 jours d'incubation, les papiers fil<br />
tres ont ete recueillis puis nettoyes selon la methode<br />
de Rashid et Schaefer (1984). Le poids de cellulose<br />
pur restant apres incubation a ete calcule comme la<br />
difference de deux pesees: une premiere realisee<br />
apres sechage a 105°C et une deuxieme apres incine<br />
ration a500°C.<br />
RESULTATS<br />
Le papier filtre est passe par differentes etapes de<br />
degradation sous I'effet des micro-organismes cellu<br />
lolytiques. Cette evolution s'est manifestee par<br />
I'apparition de taches jaunes, grises, brunes et meme<br />
rougeatres.<br />
Entre les touffes d'alfa<br />
L'activite cellulolytique mesuree in vitro de la mi<br />
croflore est plus intense pour le sol de la station semi<br />
aride que pour celui de la station aride et ceci, aussi<br />
bien pour les echantillons preleves en surface qu'en<br />
profondeur. En effet, le pourcentage de degradation<br />
varie de 20 a 85% pour la premiere station et de 11 a<br />
42% pour la seconde. Cette cellulolyse diminue avec<br />
la profondeur du sol dans les deux stations. Dans la<br />
station semi-aride, les taux de degradation enregistres<br />
(Figure 2) sont de 22 a85% en surface et de 20 a70%<br />
en profondeur. Dans la station aride, ces taux varient<br />
de 15 a42% dans I'horizon superficiel et de 11 a 38%<br />
en profondeur.<br />
Sous les touffes<br />
En surface, l'activite cellulolytique est plus mar<br />
quee pour le sol de la station semi-aride que pour celui<br />
de la station aride, avec des taux de degradation va-<br />
188<br />
riant de 9 a 94% pour la premiere station et de 13 a<br />
63% pour la seconde.<br />
Pour la station semi-aride, cette cellulolyse dimi<br />
nue avec la profondeur du sol. Le pourcentage de de<br />
gradation passe de 9 a 94% dans l'horizon de surface<br />
et de 9 a47% en profondeur. Par contre pour la station<br />
aride l'activite cellulolytique ne diminue pas avec la<br />
profondeur du sol: elle a meme tendance aaugmenter<br />
puisque le taux de degradation est en moyenne de 13 a<br />
53% en surface et de 17 a63% en profondeur (Figure<br />
3).<br />
L'influence du taux d'humidite et de la tempera<br />
ture sur I'activite cellulolytique en fonction des<br />
conditions d'incubation connait la meme evolution<br />
sous les touffes et entre les touffes: le maximum<br />
d'activite cellulolytique pour la station semi-aride est<br />
atteint a 30% d'humidite quelle que soit la temperature<br />
d'incubation. Pour la station aride, un maximum<br />
d'activite a ete observe a 15% d'humidite et pour des<br />
temperatures d'incubation de 15 et 30°C. A 5°C et 5%<br />
d'humidite, le papier filtre semble peu altere, si ce<br />
n'est dans sa coloration, les evolutions ponderales<br />
etant alors peu marquees.<br />
DISCUSSION<br />
L'activite cellulolytique des sols de steppes aalfa,<br />
mesuree in vitro, apparait relativement faible par rapport<br />
acelle des sols des regions temperes. Par exem<br />
pie, des mesures realisees dans les memes conditions<br />
pour les sols de la foret d'Orsay (Rashid & Schaefer,<br />
1984) ont donne des taux de degradation de I' ordre de<br />
90% (mull) et de 58% (anmoor) au bout d'un mois<br />
d'incubation, alors que dans notre cas ces valeurs<br />
n'ont ete atteintes qu'au terme de trois mois<br />
d'incubation en conditions moyennes.<br />
L'intensite de l'activite cellulolytique de la micro<br />
flore depend des conditions stationnelles, microstationnelles<br />
(sol sous la touffe et entre touffes ), de la<br />
profondeur du sol et des conditions d'incubation reali<br />
sees au laboratoire. D'apres nos resultats, elle semble<br />
etre plus importante dans la station semi-aride que<br />
dans la station aride, ce qui peut etre lie aux caracte<br />
ristiques climatiques et edaphiques des stations.<br />
L'aridite de la station de Mekalis serait non seulement<br />
climatique, mais egalement edaphique en raison de<br />
caracteres pedologiques (Pouget, 1980).<br />
ecologia <strong>mediterranea</strong> <strong>25</strong> (2) - <strong>1999</strong>
Bessah et al. Activite cellulolytique in vitro de sols de deux steppes a alfa d'AIgerie<br />
Les resultats expriment la capacite de reaction et<br />
de resistance des micro-organismes vis-a-vis de ces<br />
conditions ecologiques qui deviennent vraisembla<br />
blement limitantes le long du gradient d'aridite crois<br />
sant caracterisant les deux stations.<br />
La biomasse vegetale marque une baisse impor<br />
tante entre les deux stations. La phytomasse aerienne a<br />
ete evaluee a 8040 kg Ms / ha dans la station semi<br />
aride et a 35<strong>25</strong> kg Ms / ha dans la station aride (Ned<br />
jraoui, 1990). Cette difference peut, outre les condi<br />
tions ecologiques, etre attribuee en partie a l'intensite<br />
d'exploitation. La biomasse vegetale represente la<br />
source principale de matiere organique (Pouget, 1980 ;<br />
Kadi-Hanifi, 1998). La diminution de celle-ci entraine<br />
une baisse du taux de matiere organique dans le sol.<br />
Ce taux passe en moyenne de 1% dans la station semi<br />
aride a 0,1 % dans la station aride. Or I'incorporation<br />
de la matiere organique dans le sol influe sur la stabi<br />
lite structurale et donc sur I'aeration du sol et sa per<br />
meabilite (Duchaufour, 1970; Duthil, 1973; Guckert<br />
et al., 1975 ; Kadi-Hanifi, 1990, 1998). Elle stimule<br />
egalement le developpement de la microflore (Dommergues<br />
& Mangenot, 1970; Le Houerou, 1995).<br />
L'effet favorable de la matiere organique sur les ger<br />
mes cellulolytiques a ete mis en evidence dans des<br />
sols au Maroc par Bryssine (1967). A partir de ces<br />
travaux, nous pouvons supposer que la diminution de<br />
la matiere organique en fonction de I'aridite du climat<br />
(Pouget, 1980) est a I'origine de la faible activite de la<br />
microflore dans la station aride.<br />
La cellulolyse plus importante dans le cas de la<br />
station semi-aride peut etre influencee egalement par<br />
d'autres constituants chimiques du sol. En effet, Du<br />
chaufour (1970), Roze (1986) et Widden et al., (1988)<br />
ont mis en relation la sensibilite de I'activite cellulo<br />
Iytique et la richesse du sol en azote: la cellulolyse est<br />
plus rapide dans les milieux bien pourvus en cet ele<br />
ment, elle est par contre lente dans les milieux pauvres<br />
en azote. De plus, Berg et Rosswall (1973) ont montre<br />
que le phosphore est I' element qui favorise le plus la<br />
cellulolyse, I' azote et le calcium venant ensuite. Nos<br />
resultats concordent avec ces donnees bibliographi<br />
ques: la cellulolyse est plus active dans la station<br />
semi-aride dont les sols sont notablement mieux pour<br />
vus en ces nutriments que ceux de la station aride (Tableau<br />
2).<br />
L'activite cellulolytique est plus marquee dans les<br />
echantillons de sol preleves sous les touffes (sol rhi<br />
zospherique) que dans ceux preleves entre les touffes<br />
190<br />
d'alfa (sol nu). Cette plus forte activite doit etre liee a<br />
la quantite de matiere organique plus elevee sous la<br />
touffe et au microclimat ameliorant les conditions<br />
edaphiques creees par la touffe. En effet, la plupart<br />
des indicateurs de la fertilite du sol dans les zones ari<br />
des (matiere organique, azote total, phosphore, nom<br />
bre et activite des micro-organismes) sont plus<br />
importants sous les touffes qu'entre celles-ci (Garcia<br />
Moya & McKell, 1970; Tiedmann & Klemmedson,<br />
1973 ; Charley & West, 1975; Barth & Klemmedson,<br />
1978 ; Doescher et al., 1984 ; Noy-Meir, 1985 ; Klo<br />
patek, 1987; Bolton et al., 1990). Ainsi, les racines<br />
peuvent enrichir le sol en matiere organique et stimu<br />
ler leur colonisation par les micro-organismes rhizos<br />
pheriques (Warembourg, 1975 ; Hailer & Stolp, 1985 ;<br />
Gorissen, 1994). Les produits neoformes de la litiere<br />
racinaire, tres importante chez ]' alfa, et les produits<br />
simples issus de I'exsudation racinaire (polysacchari<br />
des), favorisent la proliferation de bacteries et de<br />
champignons (Dommergues & Mangenot, 1970; Zeriahene,<br />
1987). De plus, Djellali (1981), Ali-Haimoud<br />
(1982) et Kihal (1986) ont demontre que la rhizos<br />
phere de I'alfa presente une action positive sur la mi<br />
croflore des sols de steppes.<br />
La profondeur du sol influe egalement sur<br />
I' activite cellulolytique. Entre les touffes, I'activite de<br />
la microflore diminue avec la profondeur dans la sta<br />
tion aride comme dans la station semi-aride. Cette dif<br />
ference d'activite entre surface et profondeur serait en<br />
relation avec la distribution verticale des micro<br />
organismes. Ces derniers se trouvent en majorite dans<br />
la couche superficielle du sol, mieux aeree et plus ri<br />
che en substances nutritives et leur nombre diminue<br />
progressivement avec la profondeur (Boullard & Mo<br />
reau, 1962 ; Gaucher, 1968 ; Dommergues & Mange<br />
not, 1970). Les memes resultats ont ete obtenus dans<br />
les landes bretonnes (Roze, 1986) oll l'activite cellu<br />
lolytique mesuree in situ est de plus en plus reduite en<br />
fonction de la profondeur du sol. Les travaux de Djel<br />
lali (1981) et Ali-Haimoud (1982) confirment ce fait<br />
pour des sols alfatiers d'AIgerie.<br />
Sous les touffes, I'activite cellulolytique augmente<br />
avec la profondeur du sol dans la station aride. Par<br />
contre, sous conditions semi-arides, cette activite cel<br />
lulolytique diminue avec la profondeur du sol. Cette<br />
difference de fonctionnement de la microflore en<br />
fonction de la profondeur est probablement liee a la<br />
morphologie racinaire de I'alfa. En effet, les racines<br />
d'alfa presentent des modifications qui leur permettent<br />
ecologia <strong>mediterranea</strong> <strong>25</strong> (2) - <strong>1999</strong>
Bessah et al. Activite cellulolytique in vitro de sols de deux steppes Cl alfa d'Algerie<br />
de mieux s'adapter aux conditions hydriques et edaphiques<br />
de leur biotope (Zeriahene, 1987; Aidoud,<br />
1989; Nedjraoui, 1990). En fonction de l'aridite, les<br />
racines deviennent de plus en plus longues et epais<br />
ses: 33,76 cm de longueur et 2,5 mm de diametre<br />
pour l'alfa des regions pre-sahariennes, 24,5 cm de<br />
longueur et I mm de diametre pour I'alfa provenant<br />
des regions semi-arides (Nedjraoui, 1990).<br />
Dans la station semi-aride, les sols sont peu pro<br />
fonds et la croute calcaire est proche de la surface,<br />
constituant ainsi un obstacle au developpement des<br />
racines en profondeur. Celles-ci parviennent difficile<br />
ment a franchir la croute calcaire et forment un reseau<br />
dense au niveau de I'horizon superficiel. Le develop<br />
pement racinaire se fait donc lateralement. Dans la<br />
station aride, les sols a texture essentiellement sa<br />
bleuse sont assez profonds. Les racines sont essen<br />
tiellement pivotantes et penetrent profondement dans<br />
le sol a la recherche de zones plus humides. Ainsi la<br />
repartition des germes cellulolytiques suit celle des<br />
racines ; leur activite diminue avec la profondeur dans<br />
la station semi-aride et augmente avec celle-ci dans la<br />
station aride. Cette derniere observation rejoint celle<br />
de Labroue et Lascombes (1975) qui ont trouve dans<br />
les sols de I' etage alpin une activite cellulolytique in<br />
situ plus importante en profondeur qu'en surface. Se<br />
Ion ces auteurs, cette intensite de l'activite cellulolyti<br />
que serait liee a l'enracinement profond des graminees<br />
colonisant la station etudiee.<br />
L'intensite de l'activite cellulolytique varie egalement<br />
en fonction de l'humidite. En effet, les resultats<br />
obtenus apres incubation a differents taux d'humidite<br />
montrent que les micro-organismes caracteristiques de<br />
la station semi-aride, probablement adaptes a un taux<br />
d'humidite relativement important, reagissent mieux a<br />
30% d'humidite. Par contre, dans la station aride ou<br />
les micro-organismes sont probablement adaptes a une<br />
certaine secheresse du milieu, la reaction est maximale<br />
a 15% d'humidite.<br />
L'activite cellulolytique est maximale parfois a<br />
30° et parfois a 15°C dans les deux stations. Ces re<br />
sultats seraient lies aux exigences de la microflore vis<br />
a vis de la temperature. Dommergues et Mangenot,<br />
(1970) signalent une activite des bacteries cellulolytiques<br />
a partir de 15-20°C avec des valeurs optimales de<br />
28-30°C. Le minimum d'activite cellulolytique est ob<br />
serve a 5°C. Nous avons deja montre (Roze, 1986)<br />
que des temperatures trop basses induisent une faible<br />
activite cellulolytique.<br />
ecologia <strong>mediterranea</strong> <strong>25</strong> (2) - <strong>1999</strong><br />
CONCLUSION<br />
Cette etude a permis de quantifier l'activite ·cellulolytique<br />
dans les sols de steppes et de rechercher les<br />
principaux facteurs de sa variation. Elle aborde un<br />
volet particulier du fonctionnement qui vient s'ajouter<br />
aux travaux anterieurs realises dans les steppes a alfa<br />
par Aidoud (1989), Nedjraoui (1990) et Kadi-Hanifi<br />
(1998). Les resultats obtenus ont montre que l'activite<br />
cellulolytique diminue avec I'aridite et la profondeur<br />
du sol. La morphologie de la touffe d'alfa semble modifier<br />
la distribution verticale de la microflore cellu<br />
lolytique. Le taux d'humidite constitue un facteur<br />
essentiel qui n'est pas independant de la structure de<br />
la touffe d'alfa.<br />
L'activite cellulolytique met en relief des differen<br />
ces entre les stations qui avaient deja ete evoquees : il<br />
s'agit donc d'un bon indicateur de la degradation des<br />
sols. Cet indicateur devra etre confronte a d'autres,<br />
tels que la proteolyse et la mineralisation de I'azote,<br />
afin de determiner son niveau de pertinence.<br />
BIBLIOGRAPHIE<br />
Aidoud A., 1989. Contribution Cl l'etude des ecosystemes<br />
steppiques patures des hautes plaines algero-oranaises.<br />
These de Doctorat, Alger, 240 p.<br />
Aidoud A., & Touffet J., 1996. La regression de I'alfa (Stipa<br />
tenacissima L.), graminee perenne, un indicateur de desertification<br />
des steppes algeriennes. Secheresse, 7: 187<br />
193.<br />
Ali-Haimoud A., 1982. Contribution al'etude des sols alfatiers.<br />
Fixation de I'azote asymbiotique. Effet du paillage<br />
sur cette activite. These, Magister, Alger, 112 p.<br />
Aronson J., Floret c., Le Floc'h E., Ovalle c., Pontanier R.,<br />
1995. Restauration et rehabilitation des ecosystemes degrades<br />
en zones arides et semi-arides. Le vocabulaire et<br />
les concepts. In: L'homme peut-il refaire ce qu'il a defait?<br />
John Libbey Eurotext, Paris, p. 11-29.<br />
Barth R.c., & Klemmedson J.O, 1978. Shrub induced spatial<br />
patterns of dry matter, nitrogen and organic carbon.<br />
Soil Sci. Soc. Am. J., 42: 804- 809.<br />
Berg B., & Roswall T., 1973. Decomposition ofcellulose in<br />
laboratory pot experiment. Swedish IBP tundra Biome<br />
Projet Tech Report, 14: 207- 212.<br />
Bessah R., 1998. De la decomposition des litieres ala mineralisation<br />
de l'azote dans les steppes a alfa du Sud oranais.<br />
Memoire de Magister, Alger, 120 p.<br />
Bolton H., JR., Smith J.L., & Wildungr E., 1990. Nitrogen<br />
mineralization potentials of shrub steppe soils with different<br />
disturbance histories. Soil Sci. Soc. Am. J. 54:<br />
887- 891.<br />
Boullard B., & Moreau R. , 1962. Sol, microflore et vegetation.<br />
Equilibre biochimique et concurrences biologiques.<br />
Masson, Paris, 168 p.<br />
191
Bessah et al. ActiviM cel/ulolytique in vitro de sols de deux steppes a alfa d'AIgerie<br />
Bryssine I., 1967. La richesse des sols marocains en germes<br />
cellulolytiques en fonction des conditions ecologiques.<br />
Ann. Inst. Pasteur, Paris, 115: 542-548.<br />
Charley J.L., West N.E., 1977. Micropatterns of nitrogen<br />
mineralization activity in soils of some shrub dominated<br />
semi-deserts ecosystems of Utah. Soil BioI. Bioch., 9:<br />
357- 365.<br />
Djellali N., 1981. Contribution a I'etude microbiologique<br />
des sols a alfa. Mineralisation de I'azote et du carbone<br />
dans le sol de l'alfa de Ain Oussera. Effet du pail/age<br />
sur cette activite. These, Magister, Alger, 105 p.<br />
Djellouli Y., 1990. Flare et climat en AIgerie septentrionale.<br />
Determinisme climatique des especes. These, Doctorat,<br />
Alger, 296 p.<br />
Doescher P.S., Miller R.F, & Winward A.H., 1984. Soil<br />
chemical patterns under eastern Oregon communities<br />
dominated by big bage brush. Soil, Sci. Soc. Am. 1., 48:<br />
659-663.<br />
Dommergues Y., & Mangenot E, 1970. Ecologie microbienne<br />
du sol. Masson, Paris, 783 p.<br />
Duchaufour P., 1970. Pedologie : constitutions et proprietes<br />
du sol. Masson, Paris, 459 p.<br />
Duthil J., 1973. Elements d'ecologie et d'agronomie, tome<br />
3, Bailliere, Paris, 651 p.<br />
Garcia-Moya E., & McKell C.M., 1970. Contribution of<br />
shrubs to the nitrogen economy of a desert wash plant<br />
community. Ecology, 51: 81-88.<br />
Gaucher G., 1968. Traite de pedologie agricole. Dunod, Paris,<br />
578 p.<br />
Gorissen T.. 1994. Microbial activity and soil carbon dynamics<br />
in a changing climate. Change, 21: 6-8.<br />
Guckert A., Chore T.H., & Jacquin E, 1975. Microflore et<br />
stabilite structurale des sols. Rev. Ecol. BioI. Sol, I: 211<br />
223.<br />
Hailer T., & Stolp H., 1985. Quantitative estimation of root<br />
exsudation of maize plants. Plant and Soil, 86: 207-211.<br />
Kadi-Hanifi H., 1990. Etude phytoecologique des formations<br />
aalfa dans le sud oranais. Biocenose, 1-2: 37-67<br />
Kadi-Hanifl H., 1998 L'alfa en AIgerie : syntaxonomie, relations<br />
milieu-vegetation, dynamique et perspectives<br />
d'avenir. These, Doctorat, Alger, 267 p.<br />
192<br />
Kihal BM., 1986. Contribution cl l'etude de la lIlicroflore<br />
des sols a/fatiers au cours de l'annee et recherche des<br />
micro-organismes cel/ulo/ytiques. These, Magister,<br />
Oran, 105 p.<br />
Klopatek J.M., 1987. Nitrogen mineralization and nitrification<br />
in mineral soil of Pinyon-Juniper ecosystem. Soil<br />
Sci. Soc. Am. J., 52: 453-457.<br />
Labroue L., & Lascombes G., 1975. L'activite cellulolytique<br />
dans les sols de quelques stations de l'etage alpin du pic<br />
du Midi de Bigorre. Rev. Ecol. BioI. Sol, I: 181-192.<br />
Le Houerou RN., 1995. Degradation, regeneration et mise<br />
en valeur des terres seches d'Afrique. In : L 'holllme peW<br />
il re/aire ce qu'il a de/ait ? J. Libbey Eurotext, Paris:<br />
65-102.<br />
Nedjraoui D., 1990. Adaptation de l'a/jcl (Stipa tenacissima<br />
L.) aux conditions stationnel/es. Contribution a I'etude<br />
du fonctionnement de l'ecosysteme steppique. These,<br />
Doctorat, Alger, <strong>25</strong>6 p.<br />
Noy-Meir I., 1985. Desert ecosystem structure and function:<br />
In: M. Avenari, I. Noy-Meyer, & D.W. Goodhall (Ed.).<br />
Ecosystems of the world, vol 27: hot deserts and arid<br />
shrub lands. 93-103, Elsevier, Amsterdam.<br />
Pouget M., 1980. Les relations sol- vegetation dans les steppes<br />
sud algeroises. ORSTOM, Paris, 555 p.<br />
Rashid GH., & Shaefer R., 1984. Activite cellulolytique<br />
dans deux sols d'une catena de la fixet d'Orsay. Rev.<br />
Ecol. Bioi. Sol, 4: 431-438.<br />
Roze E, 1986. Le cycle de I'azote dans les landes bretonnes.<br />
These, Doctorat, Rennes, 292 p.<br />
Tiedman A.R., & Klemmedson J.Q., 1973. Effect of mesquite<br />
on physical and chemical properties of the soil. J.<br />
Range Manag., 26: 27- 29.<br />
Warembourg ER., 1975. Application des techniques radioisotopiques<br />
it l'etude de l'activite ecologique dans la rhizosphere<br />
des plantes. Rev. Ecol. BioI. Sol, I: 261- 272.<br />
Widden P., Cunningham 1., & Breil B., 1988. Decomposition<br />
of cotton by Trichoderma species. Influence of<br />
temperature, soil type and nitrogen levels. Can. J.<br />
Micro., 35: 469- 473.<br />
Zeriahene N., 1987. Etude du systeme racinaire de I'a/jcl<br />
(Stipa tenacissima L.) en relation avec I'adaptation au<br />
xerophytisme. These, Magister, Oran, 113 p.<br />
ecologia <strong>mediterranea</strong> <strong>25</strong> (2) - <strong>1999</strong>
Guiot et al.<br />
INTRODUCTION<br />
During the last decades, transfer functions have<br />
been used to reconstruct past environments from ter<br />
restrial data (pollen, diatoms, tree-rings, insects, mol<br />
luscs ... ) as well as from ocean data (foraminifera,<br />
diatoms, dinoflagelates ... ). The methods primarily<br />
used were based on modern distribution of one or sev<br />
eral species in a climatic domain (lversen, 1944;<br />
Grichuk, 1984; Atkinson et al., 1987; Zagwijn, 1994;<br />
Fauquette et al., 1998) or on a statistical calibration of<br />
modern assemblages in terms of climatic variables,<br />
using (i) multivariate statistical analyses (lmbrie &<br />
Kipp, 1971; Gasse & Tekaya, 1983; Ko
Guiot et al.<br />
Pollen pft<br />
Boreal summergreen<br />
Boreal conifer<br />
Cool temperate conifer (including cte!)<br />
Temperate summergreen (including tsl)<br />
Temperate summergreen (warmer)<br />
Warm temperate evergreen (including wtel)<br />
Warm temperate evergreen (warmer)<br />
Alpine-arctic shrubs<br />
Cool grass/shrub<br />
Heath<br />
Warm grass/shrub<br />
Desert forbs<br />
Glacial maximum climate by inverse vegetation modelling<br />
Code R<br />
bs 0.85<br />
bec 0.84<br />
ctc 0.81<br />
ts 0.79<br />
ts2 0.55<br />
wte 0.85<br />
wte2 0.76<br />
aa 0.80<br />
cogs 0.79<br />
h 0.41<br />
wags 0.79<br />
df 0.55<br />
Table I. Results of the transfer translating NPP into pollen pft scores. We use 8 neurones in the intermediate layer and a logsigmoid<br />
at the intermediate as well as at the output layer. The 13 inputs are transformed each into 5 classes by "fuzzification" (see<br />
Guiot et al., 1996). R is the correlation between observations and predictions on the 1245 spectra used for calibration.<br />
Our final goal is to reconstruct these bioclimatic<br />
variables that constrain the vegetation by a kind of in<br />
version of the model.<br />
The vegetation model<br />
BIOME3.5 is a process-based terrestrial biosphere<br />
model which includes a photosynthesis scheme that<br />
simulates acclimation of plants to changed atmos<br />
pheric CO 2 by optimisation of nitrogen allocation to<br />
foliage and by accounting for the effects of CO 2 on net<br />
assimilation, stomatal conductance, leaf area index<br />
(LAI) and ecosystem water balance. It assumes that<br />
there is no nitrogen limitation.<br />
The inputs of the model are soil texture, CO 2 rate,<br />
absolute minimum temperature (Tmin), monthly mean<br />
temperature (T), monthly total precipitation (P) and<br />
monthly mean sunshine (S) i.e. the ratio between the<br />
actual number of hours with sunshine over the poten<br />
tial number (with no clouds). From these input vari<br />
ables, BIOME3.5 computes bioclimatic variables<br />
(growing degree-days, ratio of actual evapotranspira<br />
tion to evapotranspiration at the equilibrium and pre<br />
cipitation minus evapotranspiration) that represent<br />
energy and water constraints on the vegetation. Then,<br />
the model calculates the maximum sustainable leaf<br />
area index and the NPP (in kg m- 2 y(l) for the pfts<br />
able to live in such an input climate. Competition<br />
among pfts is simulated by using the optimal NPP of<br />
each pft as an index of competitiveness. We use the 10<br />
pfts present in our modern pollen dataset: temperate<br />
broad-leaved evergreen (tbe), temperate summergreen<br />
(ts), temperate evergreen conifer (tc), boreal evergreen<br />
(bec), boreal deciduous (bs), temperate grass (tg),<br />
woody desert plant type (wd), tundra shrub type (tus),<br />
196<br />
cold herbaceous type (clg), lichen/forb type (If). The<br />
pollen pfts are slightly different in such a way that<br />
some of these pfts are sometimes subdivided.<br />
We retain as predictors the NPP of these 10 pfts,<br />
the total annual net absorbed photosynthetically active<br />
radiation (APAR in MJ.m- 2 .yr- 1 ) and the LAI of the<br />
dominant pft (with a maximum NPP). For a better dis<br />
crimination, we use also an additional predictor re<br />
lated to the rank of the pft in the above list, so that<br />
forest pfts have a lower rank than the herbaceous pfts.<br />
Transfer function (TF) from BIOME3.5 to pollen<br />
BIOME3.5 is run, on the 1245 modern pollen<br />
samples, to estimate the 13 predictors described in<br />
section 2.1. Then we use a backpropagation neural<br />
network technique (as in section 1) to calculate a set<br />
of non-linear relationships between the 12 pollen<br />
derived pft scores and the 13 predictors. The correla<br />
tion coefficients are greater than 0.55 and often<br />
greater than 0.8 (see Table 1) except for the heaths<br />
(mainly Calluna) which is a really ubiquitous pft.<br />
The likelihood function (LH)<br />
The inverse modelling problem consists in finding<br />
the value of an input parameter vector for which the<br />
model output fits as much as possible a set of obser<br />
vations (Mosegaard & Tarantola, 1995). Here, the pa<br />
rameters of the model are a set of climatic variables<br />
which constrain properly the pollen pft scores.<br />
The crudest approach is the exhaustive sampling,<br />
where all the points in a dense grid, covering the<br />
model space, are visited. This method is not be rec<br />
ommended if the number of parameters is high. An<br />
ecologia <strong>mediterranea</strong> <strong>25</strong> (2) - <strong>1999</strong>
Guiot et al.<br />
alternative approach is the Bayesian approach which<br />
describes the "0 priori information" we may have on<br />
the parameter vector by a probability density. Then it<br />
combines this information with the information pro<br />
vided by the comparison of the information provided<br />
by the model to that provided by the observations in<br />
order to define a probability density representing the a<br />
posteriori information. The likelihood function, which<br />
roughly measures the fit between observed data and<br />
data predicted by the model, links the a posteriori<br />
probability to the a priori one.<br />
To give a maximum weight to cases where the cor<br />
rect biome is predicted, we adopt a likelihood function<br />
LH which is proportional to the difference between<br />
predicted and observed pft and also to the difference<br />
between predicted and observed biomes. More details<br />
are given in Guiot et al. (in press).<br />
Definition of the parameter vector<br />
The parameters of interest in this study are tem<br />
perature and precipitation. We add to the modern<br />
monthly temperatures a term L'l T; and we multiply<br />
the modern monthly precipitation by a given !1P<br />
J<br />
(all<br />
being either positive or negative). It is not necessary to<br />
sample independently the 12 monthly parameters be<br />
cause they are linked by the seasonal cycle. Thus, we<br />
vary first the January and July climatic parameters;<br />
then, we deduce the value for the other months<br />
U=I, ...,l2) by linear interpolation (Guiot et aI., in<br />
press).<br />
The sunshine parameter cannot be processed inde<br />
pendently from temperature and precipitation as it re<br />
lates more or less strongly to the latter ones (see Table<br />
4 in Guiot et al., in press).<br />
Consequently, for each parameter vector (L'lTJan,<br />
L'lTJul. L'lPJan, L'lPJul ), we calculate 12 monthly temperature<br />
values (Tj+L'lT j , j=1,12), 12 monthly precipitation<br />
values (Pj*L'lPj, j=I,12) and 12 monthly sunshine val<br />
ues which are then used as input into the vegetation<br />
model.<br />
Monte-Carlo sampling (Metropolis-Hastings algorithm)<br />
Let us consider a multi-dimensional mathematical<br />
domain where each dimension represents a parameter<br />
range. A vector of parameters is an element of the<br />
ecologia <strong>mediterranea</strong> <strong>25</strong> (2) - <strong>1999</strong><br />
Glacial maximum climate by inverse vegetation modelling<br />
multi-dimensional domain. The Metropolis-Hastings<br />
(MH) algorithm is an iterative method which browses<br />
the domain of the parameters according to an accep<br />
tance-rejection rule (Metropolis et aI., 1953 ; Hast<br />
ings, 1970). Strictly speaking, the MH algorithm is not<br />
an optimisation method of the posterior joint density<br />
function, but a method for browsing the prior defini<br />
tion domain of the parameter vector in order to simu<br />
late its posterior distribution. The histograms of the<br />
parameters are incremented according to the candidate<br />
or the actual value, according to the fact that it is ac<br />
cepted or not. These histograms are estimates of the<br />
posterior probability distribution of the parameters.<br />
The MH algorithm was applied with the LH func<br />
tion presented in section 2.3 and with a multivariate<br />
uniform distribution as a prior of the hyper-parameter.<br />
LH is not sensu stricto a likelihood function in the<br />
probability sense, but it has the form; numerous em<br />
pirical tests have shown its suitability in our applica<br />
tion.<br />
RESULTS<br />
Before applying the method to LGM pollen data, a<br />
test was performed on 591 pollen data selected among<br />
the 1245 spectra of the modern data set. These 591<br />
spectra are more or less equally distributed in Europe<br />
and Eurasia.<br />
Validation with modern data<br />
The CO 2 concentration was set to 340 ppmv. The<br />
input parameters were allowed to vary within the fol<br />
lowing ranges:<br />
- L'lTJan : [-10, IO]OC in terms of deviations of the<br />
observed value<br />
- L'lTJul : [-10, IO]OC in terms of deviations of the<br />
observed value<br />
- L'lPJan : [-60, 60]% of the modern value<br />
- L'lPJul : [-60, 60] % of the modern value<br />
The number of iterations is set to 2400 for each<br />
sample. The value of LH converges most of the time<br />
towards -3. We select the 10% iterations giving the<br />
highest LH (note that LH is defined as negative).<br />
Among them we select the iterations which simulates<br />
the most frequent biome. Only these selected itera<br />
tions (generally between 500 and 1000) are used for<br />
197
Guiot et al.<br />
building the a posteriori probability distribution. We<br />
calculate then the probability distribution of the four<br />
input parameters (L1TJan , L1TJu1 , L1PJan , L1P Jul ).<br />
For a given site, the results are summarised as<br />
follows: (I) we look for the mode of the distribution;<br />
(2) if it is positive we calculate the probability that it<br />
is significantly larger than 0 by summing the prob<br />
abilities above 0 (if it is negative, we proceed in the<br />
same way with the probability to be negative); (3) if<br />
that probability is less than 75%, the reconstructed<br />
value is zero, otherwise it is equal to the mode. For the<br />
next step, we retain that reconstructed values which<br />
are distributed in function of the reconstructed biome.<br />
Figure 2 shows the box plots of the reconstructed<br />
anomalies of temperature and precipitations along a<br />
gradient from the coldest to the warmest biome (the<br />
three last biomes being the driest ones).<br />
Most of the medians are zero, which shows that<br />
the mean bias is null. There are a few exceptions:<br />
- L1TJu1 is underestimated for tundra and overestimated<br />
for warm steppes, which is maybe due to the<br />
fact that the modern dataset is dominated by samples<br />
taken in very cold tundra and very warm steppes;<br />
- L1TJan is generally overestimated for warm mixed<br />
forest maybe because, in our modern dataset, that bi<br />
ome mainly occurs with mild winters;<br />
- L1PJu1 is overestimated for temperate deciduous<br />
forest, which is hard to interpret as that biome is not<br />
frequently reconstructed in our dataset (the corre<br />
sponding pollen assemblages are often similar with<br />
those sampled in cool mixed forest);<br />
- L1PJan is reconstructed as zero everywhere be<br />
cause it corresponds to probabilities less than 75%.<br />
We have also to consider the interquartile interval<br />
which is related to dispersion of the reconstructions<br />
around the median. A weak dispersion around a null<br />
median means that the parameter is extremely well<br />
reconstructed: it is the case for L1TJan in tundra, cool<br />
steppes and cool mixed forest, L1PJan everywhere, L1PJul<br />
in the driest biomes (warm mixed forest, xerophytic<br />
vegetation, steppes). The dispersion is generally weak,<br />
which encourages us to apply the method to the fossil<br />
data.<br />
The final objective of the method is to reconstruct<br />
the bioclimatic variables which drive the model. To<br />
have an idea of its precision, we use the root mean<br />
squared error (RMSE) statistic. It is calculated over all<br />
ecologia <strong>mediterranea</strong> <strong>25</strong> (2) - <strong>1999</strong><br />
Glacial maximum climate by inverse vegetation modelling<br />
the modern samples and over the two dominant biomes<br />
of the LGM (Table 2).<br />
The last glacial maximum<br />
After validation, the method can be applied to the<br />
71 fossil spectra of Europe and Eurasia. The first ex<br />
periment is based on the LGM CO 2 concentration (200<br />
ppmv: Barnola et aI., 1987). Figure 3 shows the geo<br />
graphical distribution of the three major bioclimatic<br />
variables. The western part of the continent seems to<br />
have been colder than the eastern part. The moisture<br />
variable (EIPE) does not seem to have been much<br />
lower than present except in some sites. These results<br />
must be compared with those obtained with the same<br />
data by Peyron et al. (1998) and Tarasov et al. (<strong>1999</strong>).<br />
For that, we divide the continent into four regions:<br />
Mediterranean (9 sites of Peyron), western Europe<br />
(the other 6 sites of Peyron), northern Eurasia (the<br />
sites of Tarasov at north of 53°N), Southern Eurasia<br />
(the sites of Tarasov at south of 53°N). We do not mix<br />
the reconstructions of the two papers because there is<br />
a difference in the number of variables reconstructed.<br />
We compare also these reconstructions to a second<br />
experiment based on 340 ppmv of CO2• The results<br />
are summarised as box plots in Figure 4.<br />
Figure 4 shows well the west-east gradient of<br />
MTCO and GDD5. It shows also the good agreement<br />
between the results of the pft method and those of the<br />
two experiments (200 and 340 ppmv). For E/PE, the<br />
agreement is also good except for western Europe,<br />
where the vegetation model is able to produce cool<br />
steppes with a small decrease of available water (and a<br />
large decrease of temperature), while, for the pft<br />
method, it is necessary to decrease EIPE to values less<br />
than 65%.<br />
The box plots of Figure 4 are not enough detailed<br />
to compare the results between 200 and 340 ppmv<br />
CO 2 • Indeed, it has been shown (Guiot et aI., in press)<br />
that the response of pollen pft to climatic change<br />
could appear as multimodal distribution. To analyse<br />
these responses in more detail, we have selected a few<br />
sites in each of the four zones and we have represented<br />
these distributions for the three bioclimatic pa<br />
rameters (Figure 5).<br />
MTCO: there is no significant deviation between<br />
the two distributions except in Mediterranean region<br />
where anomalies of -<strong>25</strong>°C are more probable under<br />
low CO 2 than higher anomalies;<br />
199
Guiot et al. Glacial maximum climate by inverse vegetation modelling<br />
70 0<br />
70 0<br />
70 0<br />
MTCO : deviations from modern value (OC)<br />
•<br />
Pro.b=75% 10<br />
N<br />
GODS : deviations from modern value (OC*day)<br />
Prob=75% 2000<br />
•<br />
N<br />
N<br />
• Pro.b=75%<br />
Figure 3. Reconstruction of three bioclimatic parameters using inverse modelling of pollen spectra for the last glacial maximum<br />
ecologia <strong>mediterranea</strong> <strong>25</strong> (2) - <strong>1999</strong> 201<br />
10go Ii<br />
5<br />
o<br />
1000<br />
o
Madon ct a1. Influence ofstudy scale on the characterisation afp/ants community organisation<br />
INTRODUCTION<br />
Patterns of species distributions, at the community,<br />
the landscape, or the region level first focused mainly<br />
on the response of the species to an environmental<br />
gradient (see in particular Clements, 1916, 1936;<br />
Oleason, 1917, 1926; Whittaker, 1951, 1967; Curtis,<br />
1959, and see also the recent synthetical model of<br />
Collins et al., 1993). An environmental gradient, or<br />
complex gradient (Whittaker, 1967) is the factors as a<br />
whole -including biotic factors- changing in space and<br />
governing the species distribution.<br />
In later studies, the pattern analysis of species dis<br />
tributions took factors other than environmental axes<br />
into account, what Whittaker (1975) called « noise»<br />
in quantitative analysis was carefully studied. In par<br />
ticular, at the community level, patch dynamics (Levin<br />
& Paine, 1974; Whittaker & Levin, 1977; Connell,<br />
1978, 1979) has had a considerable impact on the un<br />
derstanding of the community functioning. According<br />
to this concept, a plant community is a mosaic of<br />
patches of differing successional stages. The existence<br />
of these successional stages would be caused by dis<br />
turbances. The hierarchical organisation of the com<br />
munity, or of the region (Alien, 1987; Kolasa, 1989;<br />
Pickett et al., 1989) develops this concept by consid<br />
ering (Kolasa's model) the habitat as hierarchically<br />
heterogeneous. For example, patches are made of<br />
smaller patches; the latter are made of even smaller<br />
patches. The species are distributed in these patches<br />
according to their specialisation level. The core<br />
satellite hypothesis (Hanski, 1982 , 1991) distin<br />
guishes core species - frequent and abundant - from<br />
satellite species - sparse and rare. A few abundant<br />
species are infrequent - urban species - and a few rare<br />
species are frequent - rural species.<br />
This body of theories (hierarchical organisation<br />
and core-satellite hypothesis) predicts that species<br />
which constitute the largest category would be the<br />
least frequent ones (to be found in less than 10 % of<br />
sites). Discrepancies appear for other maxima: Ko<br />
lasa's model (1989) predicts other peaks of species<br />
number which are weaker and weaker towards the<br />
highest frequencies (Figure IA), while Hanski's<br />
model (1982) predicts only a second maximum, for<br />
the most frequent species (Figure ID). These latter<br />
models loosely relate to gradients. Hanski (1982)<br />
stresses that her theory is applicable when sites are in<br />
similar habitats, but Collins et al. (1993) introduce an<br />
206<br />
environmental gradient (Figure 2) in their hierarchical<br />
continuum concept, a synthesis between the individu<br />
alistic hypothesis (Oleason, 1917, 1926), the hierar<br />
chical structure ofcommunity (Kolasa, 1989), and the<br />
core-species hypothesis (Hanski, 1982, 1991).<br />
The purpose of this study is to appreciate the effect<br />
of sampling scale on predictive and explanating value<br />
of various models at the level of the community. The<br />
impact of scaling is examined through two different<br />
problems:<br />
- the detection of ecological gradients through the<br />
means of Correspondence Analysis (CA);<br />
- the validation of one of the two contradictory<br />
models: core-satellite hypothesis or Kolasa' s model.<br />
About the first point, the area-richness curves<br />
show the key-role of the area investigated for meas<br />
uring richness (e.g. Arrhenius, 1921; Connor &<br />
McCoy, 1979; Williamson, 1988; Rey Benayas et al.,<br />
<strong>1999</strong>). Then one must consider how the census of new<br />
species influences the detection of ecological gradi<br />
ents, as sample size increases. According to the hierarchical<br />
organisation theory, patches of various sizes<br />
could generate changing interpretation for gradients<br />
by changing scale. Several cases can occur: (i) the<br />
detected ecological gradients are the same at all the<br />
scales, in the same order of importance; (ii) they are<br />
the same but in different orders; (iii) they are not the<br />
same. The ordination of samples on axes must also be<br />
considered. It can vary as the size of the sample var<br />
ies.<br />
The second point has been studied by varying the<br />
level of organisation. Hanski (1982, 1991) originally<br />
put forward the core-satellite hypothesis for regional<br />
distribution patterns, then Ootelli & Simberloff<br />
(1987), Collins & Olenn (1990) proved that commu<br />
nity-level data and small-scale study data supported<br />
this model. But what about scaling at the same level<br />
(here the community)? Coliins & Olenn (1990) le<br />
gitimately suspect a strong influence of scaling on fre<br />
quency measures, but this must be tested.<br />
METHODS AND STUDY SITE<br />
Study site<br />
The study was carried out in a Mediterranean<br />
limestone grassland. This grassland lies on the western<br />
ridge of the Massif du Ventoux (Provence, France) at<br />
a height of 835 m.<br />
ec%gia <strong>mediterranea</strong> <strong>25</strong> (2) - <strong>1999</strong>
Madon et al. Influence ofstudy scale on the characterisation ofplants community organisation<br />
Axis I Axis 2 Axis 3 Species number<br />
Quadrats A 14,65 11,36 10,01 56<br />
Quadrats B 18,16 12,40 10,14 61<br />
Quadrats C 17,21 11,12 9,98 76<br />
Quadrats D 16,07 11,46 11,18 86<br />
Table I. Relative inertia partition on the three first axes of CA for the four sampling scales<br />
Positive contributions Negative contributions<br />
A B C D A B C D<br />
Petrorhagia prolifera 99 Argyrolobium zanonii 43<br />
Centaurea IJanicu/ata 58 Teucrium montanum 38 36 49<br />
Koeleria vallesiana 62 Fumana procumbens 50 38 29 37<br />
Crupina vulr;aris 38 52 40 Genista hispanica 51 42 74 81<br />
Trinia Rlauca 82 69 38 31 Leuzea conifera 33 28<br />
Cerastium arvense suffruticosum 100 74 53 46 Aster sedifolius 56 44<br />
Echium vu/gare 40 Ame/anchier ovalis 54 40<br />
Lactuca perennis 60 Quercus humilis 74<br />
Anthericum /i/iaRo 54 31 Dactvlis f!lomerata 28<br />
Bupleurum baldense 51 35 34 Potentilla hirta 62<br />
Sedum acre 57 32<br />
Helianthemum nUl7lmu/arium 41<br />
Asperula cynanchica 38<br />
Arl7leria arenaria 72 74<br />
Genista X martinii 39<br />
Table 2. Highest plant species contribution for axis I to the different scales<br />
Quadrats A B C D<br />
Axes 1 2 1 2 1 2 1 2<br />
A I 1.000<br />
2 0.033 1.000<br />
B 1 0.758 0.399 1.000<br />
2 -0.104 0.543 0.134 1.000<br />
C I 0.532 0.290 0.681 0.196 1.000<br />
2 0.176 0.080 0.110 -0.237 -0.123 1.000<br />
D I 0.348 0.080 0.406 0.055 0.638 -0.185 1.000<br />
2 -0.021 0.015 0.018 0.015 -0.042 -0.001 0.068 1.000<br />
Table 3. Correlations between axes 1 and 2 on the different scales (correlations for axes I in bold)<br />
The positive pole is characterised for each scale by<br />
species of xeric grasslands (Thero-Brachypodietalia),<br />
in particular with some annuals (Petrorhagia prolif<br />
era, Crupina vulgaris, Bupleurum baldense). The<br />
negative pole is characterised for each scale by species<br />
which are less xerophytic and often belong to more<br />
mature communities.<br />
Axis I appears to represent a gradient linked to the<br />
water balance. The analysis of the plot-points (Figure<br />
I) indicates that their projection onto axis I of each<br />
CA is closely linked to their geographic arrangement<br />
along a north-south axis. The northern plots corre<br />
spond to the xeric pole. This gradient can be explained<br />
by the topography, the northern plots being more ele-<br />
ecologia <strong>mediterranea</strong> <strong>25</strong> (2) - <strong>1999</strong><br />
vated than southern ones by about I meter. Alterna<br />
tively the mass effect (Shmida & Ellner, 1984) from<br />
the ridge itself should not be dismissed. The xeric spe<br />
cies on the ridge can scatter into the windward portion<br />
of the grassland, thus increasing the xericity gradient.<br />
Axis I leads to the same interpretations, irrespec<br />
tive of the scale of data collections. This result is in<br />
keeping with the correlations between the axes I,<br />
which are relatively strong (Table 3). These correla<br />
tions are discussed below.<br />
Axis 2 always presents a weak inertia (Table I), as<br />
regards the number of species. It has not been possible<br />
to interpret it at any scale. Additionally, axes 2 at the<br />
different scales show weak correlations between one<br />
209
Madon et al. Influence ofstudy scale on the characterisation ofplants community organisation<br />
another (Table 3), except between scales A and B.<br />
However, concerning CA of quadrats D, plots which<br />
are close in space are most of the time also close on<br />
factorial axis 2. Similarly, we were unable to interpret<br />
axis 3.<br />
These results indicate that only one physical gradi<br />
ent can be identified at the different scales we examined.<br />
The organisation of the plot-points is slightly<br />
different on axis I according to the size of the<br />
quadrats (plot 9 in particular shows an important move<br />
along axis I).<br />
Interpretation of species contributions by their pat·<br />
terns of distribution<br />
If we examine the species with a strong contribu<br />
tion for axis I (Table 2), we can make out 3 groups:<br />
Species characterising the poles (positive or nega<br />
tive) only on a fine scale (Petrorhagia prolifera, Ar<br />
gyrolobium zanonii... ). We hypothesise that these<br />
species are simply more scattered in one environment<br />
than another (at one geographic pole than another). In<br />
a limited sampling, th€y would tend to appear in one<br />
type of environment only, in such a way that they<br />
largely contribute to determine axis 1. On the con<br />
trary, when sampling scale increases, they would also<br />
appear in the other environment and their contribution<br />
would decrease, i.e. they would take a lesser part in<br />
the discrimination between one environment and the<br />
other.<br />
Species characterising the poles at all the scales<br />
(Cerastium arvense subsp. suffruticosum, Genista his<br />
panica... ). We suggest they are almost absent from<br />
quadrats of one geographic pole whatever the scale, at<br />
least at the selected scales.<br />
Species characterising the poles only on a large<br />
scale (Sedum acre, Amelanchier ovalis... ). These spe<br />
cies are exclusively present in one environment but<br />
they are represented by individuals or groups of individuals<br />
quite sparse in this environment. Conse<br />
quently, they tend to appear only in larger sample size<br />
only.<br />
The analysis of species presence-absence data<br />
among the plots at the different scales enabled us to<br />
clearly see the interpretation proposed for each point<br />
above. A few species have a high contribution only on<br />
middle scales (Echium vulgare, Asperula cynanchica...<br />
). That means that their distribution is linked to<br />
the gradient, but that the frequency gap from one pole<br />
210<br />
to the other is of relatively little importance. Let us<br />
stress the fact that axis 1 retains its meaning across<br />
scales. Table 3 shows, however, that the correlations<br />
of axes 1 between one another are better between two<br />
successive scales.<br />
Interpretation of plot-points distribution in factorial<br />
planes by species patterns<br />
The organisation of the plot-points in the factorial<br />
planes 1-2 is very characteristic (Figure 1): the active<br />
point of a group of 4 plots (the other 3 being non ac<br />
tive) clearly shows a trend to be the furthest from the<br />
origin, whatever the CA. For an active point repre<br />
senting a quadrat of a given size, we can underline:<br />
The smallest quadrats (non-active) tend to be<br />
placed closer to the origin for they contain less often<br />
the species with a strong contribution. Indeed, we<br />
verified above that some of these species don't occur<br />
in most of the small quadrats because they are too<br />
scattered.<br />
The largest quadrats (non-active) also tend to come<br />
closer to the origin for, on the contrary, they all tend<br />
to contain some species with a strong contribution.<br />
Indeed, some of the « discriminating» species at the<br />
concerned scale are no more «discriminating» at a<br />
larger scale (see above).<br />
Patterns of species frequency<br />
We have represented in histograms the distribution<br />
of the taxa among classes of frequency (presences in<br />
the plots) (Figure 4). It appears clearly that on the<br />
smallest scale (quadrats A), collections are dominated<br />
by scarce species (lowest frequency). Secondary<br />
maxima are visible, but their distribution depends on<br />
the classes of frequencies used. When the observation<br />
scale goes up, a second peak emerges in the class of<br />
most frequent species. Thus, in larger squares, there is<br />
a large proportion of species present in one quadrat<br />
only, and a large proportion of species present in all<br />
the quadrats.<br />
On all the scales, there is a very good positive cor<br />
relation between abundance and frequency of species<br />
(Figure 5; quadrats A: r=0.81; quadrats B: r=0.79;<br />
quadrats C: r=0.81; quadrats D: r=0.82; for each test<br />
p
Madon et al. Influence ofstudy scale on the characterisation ofplants community organisation<br />
This property is consistent with expectations of<br />
Hanski's (1982) and Kolasa's (1989) models.<br />
DISCUSSION<br />
Detection of the gradients<br />
In our data, only one ecological factor was de<br />
tected, and it always corresponds to axis 1 whatever<br />
the study scale. In these data set, a small grain is thus<br />
sufficient to detect the ecological gradient. At the ex<br />
amined scales, the organisation of the vegetation in<br />
patches (Whittaker & Levin, 1977) does not influence<br />
strongly the detection of a gradient whatever the scale.<br />
Nevertheless, correlations between axes 1 are weaker<br />
and weaker as the difference of scale increases. This<br />
underlines the risks there are to introduce different<br />
size plotting in a multi-dimensional analysis.<br />
In our study, the organisation of the plot-points<br />
which is slightly different on axis 1 according to the<br />
size of the quadrats can be linked to the existence of<br />
patches. These moves correspond to a mosaic organi<br />
sation of the vegetation. In any case, patches of vari<br />
ous sizes are visible in the physiognomy of the<br />
community. For example, some Crassulaceae and an<br />
nuals are confined in microhabitats of 1 to 3 dm 2 •<br />
These microhabitats cannot be detected with the grain<br />
of resolution we have used. They are linked to distur<br />
bances and stress (Madon & Medail, 1997), and life in<br />
them is very difficult because of ranges of tempera<br />
ture, drought and the possible accumulation of litter<br />
(Fowler, 1988; Bergelson, 1990; Ryser, 1993). They<br />
are more close at the north part of the grassland than<br />
at the south part.<br />
Models of distributions offrequency<br />
Figure 4 clearly shows that, on a small scale, the<br />
results are consistent with Kolasa's model (1989): one<br />
mode for infrequent species and other secondary<br />
modes weaker and weaker towards classes of strong<br />
frequency. On the contrary, towards the large scales,<br />
the results become consistent with Hanski's model<br />
(1982) for the communities: two important modes for<br />
the two extreme classes of frequency. This result<br />
shows that even at the same level of organisation<br />
212<br />
(within the community), simply by changing the study<br />
scale, data can support one or the other model.<br />
On a small scale (quadrats of 1 m 2 ), Collins &<br />
Glenn (1990) found a second maximum in the group<br />
of high frequency. But in this study, the quadrats were<br />
adjacent: numerous species have a strong probability<br />
to occur in most of the quadrats. Indeed, the higher<br />
similarity of geographically close plots has been ac<br />
knowledged for a long time (Curtis, 1959; Whittaker,<br />
1972; Barbour et aI., 1980). Shmida & Ellner (1984)<br />
attribute this feature to mass effect, but recognise that<br />
the existence of cryptic gradient is not to be dismissed.<br />
Williams (1950) and Coilins and Glenn (1990)<br />
suggested the possibility of a « saturation» of large<br />
quadrats in a great number of species. Figure 5<br />
(quadrats D) clearly confirms this suggestion: the spe<br />
cies plotted on a small scale tend to move towards the<br />
right on the large scale graph; therefore a certain<br />
number is present in all the quadrats (
Madon et al. Influence ofstudy scale on the characterisation ofplants community organisation<br />
frequency<br />
among<br />
quadrats .&<br />
100% :-,1"..- saturation<br />
"""" _<br />
quadrats A<br />
quadrats B<br />
quadrats C<br />
quadrats D<br />
gradient<br />
Figure 6. Influence of quadrat size on the character core or satellite of a species. The size of quadrats increases from A to D. At a<br />
small scale (quadrats A), the species can be unfrequent (satellite or urban) and at a larger scale (quadrats D), the species can saturate<br />
quadrats (it is core or rural).<br />
Acknowledgements<br />
We are grateful to M. Roux for his support during<br />
the study, P. Roche & T. Tatoni for their detailed re<br />
view and two anonymous reviewers for their correc<br />
tions.<br />
REFERENCES<br />
Alien T. F. H. 1987. Hierarchical complexity in ecology: a<br />
non-euclidean conception of the data space. Vegetatio,<br />
69: 17-26.<br />
Arrhenius O. 1921. Species and area. J. Ecol., 9 : 95-99.<br />
Barbour, M. H., Burk, 1. H. & Pitts, W. D. 1980. Terrestrial<br />
Plant Ecology. Benjamin Cummings, Men10w Park,<br />
California, U.S.A.<br />
Bergelson, 1. 1990. Life after death: site pre-emption by the<br />
remains of Poa annua. Ecology, 71: 2157-2165.<br />
Clements, F. E. 1916. Plant succession: an analysis of the<br />
development of vegetation. Carnegie Inst. Wash. Pub!.<br />
n° 242.<br />
Clements, F. E. 1936. Nature and structure of the climax. J.<br />
Ecol., 24: 552-584.<br />
Collins, S. L. & Glenn, S. M. 1990. A hierarchical analysis<br />
of species' abundance patterns in grassland vegetation.<br />
Am. Nat., 135: 633-648.<br />
Collins, S. L., Glenn, S. M. & Roberts, D. W. 1993. The hierarchical<br />
continuum concept. J. Veg. Sci., 4: 149-156.<br />
Connell, 1. H. 1978. Diversity in tropical rain forests and<br />
coral reefs. Science, 199: 1302-1310.<br />
Connell, 1. H. 1979. Tropical rain forests and coral reefs as<br />
open non-equilibrium systems. In: Anderson R. M.,<br />
Turner, B. D. & Taylor, L. R. (eds.) Populations Dynamics:<br />
20th Symposium ofthe British Ecological Society,<br />
B1ackwell, Oxford: 141-163.<br />
Connor E.F. & McCoy ED. 1979. The statistics and biology<br />
of the species-area relationship. Am. Nat., 113 : 791-833.<br />
Curtis, 1. T. 1959. The vegetation of Wisconsin. Univ. Wisconsin<br />
Press, Madison.<br />
Fowler, N. 1988. What is a safe site?: neighbor, litter, germination<br />
date and patch effects. Ecology, 69: 1731<br />
1740.<br />
Frontier S. & Pichod-Viale D. 1991. Ecosystemes: structure,<br />
fonctionnement, evolution. Masson, Paris.<br />
Gleason, H. A. 1917. The structure and development of the<br />
plant association. Bull. Torrey Bot. Club, 44: 463-481.<br />
Gleason, H. A. 1926. The individualistic concept of the plant<br />
association. Bull. Torrey Bot. Club, 53: 7-26.<br />
Gotelli, N. 1. & Simberloff, F. D. 1987. The distribution and<br />
abundance of tallgrass prairie plants: a test of the coresatellite<br />
hypothesis. Am. Nat., 130: 18-35.<br />
Hanski, I. 1982. Dynamics of regional distribution: the core<br />
and satellite hypothesis. Oikos, 38: 210-221.<br />
Hanski, I. 1991. Single-species metapopulation dynamics:<br />
concepts, models and observations. Bioi. 1. Linn. Soc.,<br />
42: 17-38.<br />
Kerguelen, M. 1993. Index synonymique de la flore de<br />
France. Museum National d'Histoire Naturelle, Paris.<br />
Kolasa, 1. 1989. Ecological systems in hierarchical perspective:<br />
breaks in community structure and other consequences.<br />
Ecology, 70: 36-47.<br />
Levin, S.A. & Paine, R.T. 1974. Disturbance, patch formation<br />
and community structure. Proc. Nati. Acad. Sci.<br />
U.SA, 71: 2744-2747.<br />
Madon, O. & Medail, F. 1997. The ecological significance<br />
of annuals on a Mediterranean grassland (Mt Ventoux,<br />
France). Plant Ecol., 129: 189-199.<br />
Magurran, A. E. 1988. Ecological diversity and its measurement.<br />
Croom Helm, Princeton Univ. Press, Princeton.Pickett,<br />
S.T.A., Kolasa, 1., Armesto, 1.1. & Collins,<br />
S.L. 1989. The ecological concept of disturbance and its<br />
expression at various hierarchical levels. Oikos, 54: 129<br />
139.<br />
Rey Benayas, 1.M., Colomer, M.G.S. & Levassor, C. <strong>1999</strong>.<br />
Effects of area, environmental status and environmental<br />
variation on species richness per unit area in Mediterranean<br />
wetlands. J. Veg. Sci., 10 : 275-280.<br />
Ryser, P. 1993. Influences of neighbouring plants on seedling<br />
establishment in limestone grassland. 1. Veg. Sci., 4:<br />
195-202.<br />
ecologia <strong>mediterranea</strong> <strong>25</strong> (2) - <strong>1999</strong> 213
Madon et al. Influence ofstudy scale on the characterisation ofplants community organisation<br />
Shmida, A. & Ellner, S. 1984. Coexistence of plant species<br />
with similar niches. Vegetatio, 58: 29-55.<br />
Ter Braak, C.l.F. 1987. Ordination. In: longman, R.H.G.,<br />
Ter Braak, C.l.F., & Van Tongeren, O.F.R. (eds.) Data<br />
analysis in community and landscape ecology. Pudoc,<br />
Wageningen: 91-173.<br />
Whittaker, R. H. 1951. A criticism of the plant association<br />
and climatic climax concepts. Northw. Sci., <strong>25</strong>: 17-31.<br />
Whittaker, R. H. 1967. Gradient analysis of vegetation. Bioi.<br />
Rev., 42: 207-264.<br />
Whittaker, R. H. 1972. Evolution and measurement of species<br />
diversity. Taxon, 21: 213-<strong>25</strong>1.<br />
214<br />
Whittaker, R. H & Levin, S. A. 1977. The role of mosaic<br />
phenomena in natural communities. Theor. Pop. Bioi.,<br />
12: 117-139.<br />
Williams, C. B. 1950. The application of the logarithmic<br />
series to the frequency of occurrence of plant species in<br />
quadrats.1. Ecol., 38: 107-138.<br />
Williamson M. 1988. Relationship of species number to<br />
area, distance and other variables. In : A. A. Myers &<br />
P.S. Giller (eds.). Analytical biogeography. Chapman &<br />
Hall, London: 91-115.<br />
ecologia <strong>mediterranea</strong> <strong>25</strong> (2) - /999
Plant systematics: a phylogenetic approach<br />
W.S. JUDD, C.S. CAMPBELL, E.A. KELLOGG & P.P. TEVEN<br />
Sinauer associates, Inc., 464 p. (<strong>1999</strong>)<br />
Ce livre est une synthese de<br />
tous les travaux recents en matiere<br />
de phylogenie ainsi que de leurs<br />
applications directes dans la systematique<br />
des plantes. Le resultat<br />
est vraiment exceptionnel, compte<br />
tenu de la multitude des travaux<br />
ponctuels actuellement publies,<br />
tant d'un point de vue moleculaire<br />
que morphologique (cette derniere<br />
approche retrouvant un certain essor<br />
du fait des limitations de la<br />
precedente). Ce Iivre se presente<br />
comme une sorte de precis de systematique<br />
moderne articule en<br />
deux parties. Le lecteur se familiarisera<br />
dans un premier temps avec<br />
les techniques generales de la<br />
phylogenie, avant de decouvrir les<br />
clades degages de ces approches.<br />
Nous commen
tyledones et des Laurales avec<br />
d'autres groupes longtemps consideres<br />
comme basaux au sein des<br />
Angiospermes. Citons egalement<br />
I'admission de la plupart des ex<br />
Scrophulariaceae au sein des<br />
Plantaginaceae, ou des Anthirrinaceae,<br />
seIon les avis, ainsi que la<br />
fragmentation des Liliales - Liliaceae<br />
en un grand nombre de families<br />
et genres.<br />
Ces nombreux exemples eloignes<br />
des croyances classiques peuvent<br />
evidement donner naissance a<br />
certaines critiques plus ou moins<br />
legitimes. Quelle valeur peut-on<br />
vraiment accorder aux groupes<br />
Ghilem MANSION<br />
Institut de Botanique de Neuchatel (Suisse)<br />
consideres dans ce livre, dans la<br />
mesure ou n'ont ete envisagees que<br />
des approches partielles, avec des<br />
genes et des caracteres classiques<br />
variants selon les etudes?<br />
Nous pouvons conclure avec<br />
les propos des auteurs eux-meme,<br />
conscients des limites de cet ouvrage:<br />
"Les etudiants apprecieront<br />
{'abandon des rangs classiques...<br />
Avec ces bases, ils pourront avancer<br />
de maniere sure dans la comprehension<br />
de la diversite des<br />
plantes" ou encore "...dans ce livre,<br />
nous pensons que certains des<br />
groupes decrits seront peut-etre<br />
Biology and Wildlife of the Mediterranean Region<br />
J. BLONDEL & J. ARONSON<br />
Oxford Univ. Press, Oxford, 328 p. (<strong>1999</strong>)<br />
S'engager dans la redaction<br />
d'un ouvrage sur la biodiversite du<br />
monde mediterraneen, etait a la<br />
fois courageux et ambitieux; les<br />
auteurs le reconnaissent, comme<br />
ils indiquent en preface avoir volontairement<br />
axe leurs discussions<br />
et illustrations sur les questions et<br />
les groupes qui s'inscrivaient dans<br />
le domaine de leurs activites, tout<br />
en tentant de rester clair et d'eviter<br />
un jargon hermetique aux nonspecialistes.<br />
11 faut reconnaitre<br />
qu'ils y sont parvenus, et que cet<br />
ouvrage se lit facilement et avec<br />
interet. Je pense que le but souhaite<br />
par les auteurs est atteint, et<br />
qu'en quelques 300 pages, ils sont<br />
arrives a dresser un bilan clair et<br />
quasi-exhaustif des problemes relatifs<br />
a la biodiversite du monde<br />
mediterraneen.<br />
C'est volontairement que les<br />
auteurs restent sur des thematiques<br />
216<br />
souvent generales, et, ils le soulignent,<br />
au niveau de la semivulgarisation,<br />
car ils ne veulent<br />
nullement faire oeuvre de specialistes.<br />
Ceci assurera certainement<br />
une plus large diffusion a cet ouvrage,<br />
meme si le scientifique reste<br />
parfois sur sa faim.<br />
Les bilans et les exemples<br />
choisis illustrent clairement les caracteres<br />
majeurs du monde mediterraneen,<br />
depuis son individualisation<br />
climatique et biologique, en<br />
passant par sa mise en place actuelle<br />
et ses traits de vie, et en<br />
s'ouvrant sur les challenges que<br />
posent son avenir. Le role de l'action<br />
humaine est fort justement<br />
souligne, comme l'indique joliment<br />
le titre du chapitre 8 " Humans as<br />
sculptors of <strong>mediterranea</strong>n landscape".<br />
11 n'est question ici, ni de resumer<br />
un ouvrage extremement<br />
modifies, voire detruits, dans les<br />
annees avenir".<br />
Quoiqu'il en soit, malgre ces<br />
bemols, ce livre peut etre considere<br />
sans retenue comme une reference<br />
fondamentale pour le botaniste du<br />
prochain millenaire.<br />
Ajoutons une bibliographie<br />
pour le moins monumentale, a la<br />
fois tres recente et complete, qui<br />
justifie a elle seule I'achat de ce<br />
livre, deux appendices tres interessants<br />
et un CD Rom richement illustre<br />
et nous obtenons une bible<br />
dans le domaine, avec en prime un<br />
excellent rapport qualite/prix. A se<br />
procurer absolument !<br />
dense, ni de le critiquer, car je ne<br />
puis que souscrire, dans leurs<br />
grandes lignes, et souvent dans le<br />
detail, aux conclusions des auteurs<br />
qui, contrairement a un certain<br />
nombre de leurs predecesseurs,<br />
donnent une idee claire et juste des<br />
criteres fondamentaux du monde<br />
mediterraneen et de sa diversite.<br />
Cependant, je ne puis que regretter<br />
quelques oublis ou imprecisions.<br />
C'est ainsi, par exemple, que<br />
si definir les limites de la region<br />
mediterraneenne pose bien des<br />
problemes, mais reste necessaire,<br />
les auteurs ne contribuent guere a<br />
regler cette question. lis proposent<br />
dans les figures lA, 1.5 et 1.6, des<br />
solutions variables, excluant le S-E<br />
tunisien pour la premiere, et incluant<br />
toutes les bordures meridionales<br />
de la mer Noire qui en fait<br />
s'integrent dans la zone euxinienne<br />
(pontique) a Fagus orientalis et<br />
ecologia <strong>mediterranea</strong> <strong>25</strong> (2) - <strong>1999</strong>
Rhododendron ponticum dont le<br />
c1imat et la flore n'ont rien de mediterraneen.<br />
La carte de la figure<br />
1.6 dont je recuse toute paternite,<br />
comme cela est indique dans la legende,<br />
est la plus critiquable. Par<br />
exemple, la region saharo-arabe<br />
grignote une grande partie du<br />
Maghreb, dont les Atlas, alars que<br />
la province pontique cette fois englobe<br />
les Hauts Plateaux anatoliens<br />
et s'etend jusque sur les rivages de<br />
la Cilicie. De meme, I'idee des<br />
quatre quadrants (fig. lA) dans le<br />
monde mediterraneen est interessante,<br />
mais les limites proposees<br />
restent critiquables, surtout pour la<br />
peninsule italienne et ses lies annexes,<br />
ecartelees entre trois d'entre<br />
eux.<br />
Du point de vue historique,<br />
mon passe helas reduit et lointain<br />
de biospeleologue me fait toutefois<br />
regretter que cette facette n'ait pas<br />
ete analysee, pour rendre compte<br />
de certaines mises en place pre<br />
Miocene, a partir de la repartition<br />
d'especes cavernicoles sur lesquelles<br />
existe une bonne documentation.<br />
Parmi les "habitats" caracteristiques<br />
du monde mediterraneen,<br />
un bon bilan a ete dresse, encore<br />
que la distinction entre foret<br />
sclerophylle et foret laurifoliee aurait<br />
gagne aetre etoftee et discutee<br />
en raison de leur signification<br />
ecologique fort differente. De<br />
meme, les mares tranSltOlres, un<br />
des joyaux du monde mediterraneen,<br />
selon le mot de Braun<br />
Blanquet, avec les adaptations remarquables<br />
de leur faune et de leur<br />
flore, ne sont pas evoquees.<br />
Au niveau des traits de vie, les<br />
donnees relatives a I'origine de la<br />
sc1erophyllie et de son rOle dans le<br />
c1imat mediterraneen, de meme<br />
que le probleme du haut pourcentage<br />
de therophytes dans la flore,<br />
sont analysees, mais je demeure<br />
pour ma part sur mes incertitudes,<br />
quant aux explications et aux resultats<br />
exposes. Apropos du role<br />
et des modes de dissemination des<br />
especes et en particulier des diaspores,<br />
I'exemple des lies macaronesiennes<br />
(Canaries et Madere),<br />
aurait gagne aetre developpe.<br />
Les auteurs, a juste titre, ont<br />
mis I'accent sur les donnees historiques<br />
et le role de la region mediterraneenne<br />
en tant que capital<br />
biologique de base pour l'ec1osion<br />
des civilisations neolithiques. lis<br />
montrent une culture litteraire et<br />
histarique qui merite d'etre soulignee,<br />
et ont rendu en particulier a<br />
Theophraste, un juste hommage en<br />
tant qu' "inventeur" de la specificite<br />
du monde mediterraneen;<br />
Pierre QUEZEL<br />
Institut Mediterraneen d'Ecologie et de Paleoecologie, Marseille<br />
LOUIS-JEAN<br />
avenue d'Embrun, 05003 GAP cedex<br />
Tel. : 04 92 53 17 00<br />
Depot legal : 94 - Fevrier 2000<br />
Imprime en France<br />
mais pourquoi alars ne pas aVOlr<br />
au moins evoque son remarquable<br />
chapitre sur la biologie du figuier.<br />
..<br />
Meme si l'on pourrait citer encore<br />
quelques imprecisions ou<br />
quelques oublis, il n'en reste pas<br />
moins que le travail de BLONDEL<br />
& ARONSON, restera pour longtemps,<br />
une reference et une mine<br />
de renseignements, pour tous ceux<br />
qui aiment la region circummediterraneenne,<br />
et etudient sa<br />
faune et sa flore. Ce n'est pas I'un<br />
de leur moindre merite, que d'avoir<br />
su regrouper et integrer a la fois<br />
des groupes animaux et vegetaux,<br />
parfois fort differents quant aleurs<br />
significations histariques et a leurs<br />
reactions face aux contraintes<br />
ecologiques mediterraneennes. Les<br />
auteurs ont donc su dresser un bilan<br />
coherent, tout en soulignant la<br />
richesse biologique incomparable<br />
du monde mediterraneen, et le role<br />
qu'il a joue dans l'eclosion de nos<br />
civilisations. Ils terminent fort<br />
justement en soulignant les gravissimes<br />
menaces de tous ardres qui<br />
pesent sur lui et I'assaillent de<br />
toutes parts, et qui font certainement<br />
de cette region, a l'heure actuelle,<br />
une des plus menacees de la<br />
planete, "a microcosm of world<br />
problems".<br />
ec%gia <strong>mediterranea</strong> <strong>25</strong> (2) - /999 217
<strong>Ecologia</strong> Mediterranea publishes original research report and<br />
reviews in the fields of fundamental and applied ecology of<br />
Mediterranean areas. except descriptive articles or articles ahout<br />
systematics. The editors of <strong>Ecologia</strong> Mediterranea invite<br />
original contrihutions in the fields of: bioclimatology.<br />
biogeography, conservation biology. population hiology.<br />
genetic ecology. landscape ecology. mierohial ecology. vegetal<br />
and animal ecology, ecophysiology, palaeoecology,<br />
palaeoclimatology. but not marine ecology. Symposium<br />
proceedings, review articles, methodological notes. hook<br />
reviews and comments on recent papers in the journal are also<br />
puhlished. Manuscripts arc reviewed hy appropriate referces. or<br />
hy members of the Editorial Board, or by the Editors<br />
themselves. The final decision to accept or reject a manuscript<br />
is made by the Editors. Please send 3 copies of the manuscript<br />
to the editors. When an article is accepted, the authors should<br />
take the reviewers' comments into consideration. They must<br />
send back to the journal Editorial Office their corrected printed<br />
manuscript (onc copy) and include the corresponding floppy<br />
disk (as far as possible: 3.5" PC, Word 7 or .RTF) within 3<br />
months. The authors arc asked to check the conformity between<br />
printed and computerised versions. Enclose the original<br />
illustrations. Corrected proofs must he returned to the journal<br />
Editorial Office without delay. Books and monographs to he<br />
reviewed must be submitted to the Editors.<br />
Manuscript preparation<br />
Manuscripts (typewritten with double spacing and A4 paper<br />
size) should preferahly be written in French or English. but<br />
Spanish and Italian are accepted. If the language is not English.<br />
you should include an English short version and English titles<br />
for figures and tables.<br />
The manuscript must bc complete: French and English titles,<br />
author(s) and address(es). French and English abstracts (at<br />
least), an English short version (only if it is not the language<br />
used in the article), key-words. text. rcrerences.<br />
acknowledgements, figures and tahles. For research papers, the<br />
text should normally consist of 4 sections: introduction.<br />
methods, results and discussion.<br />
When typing the manuscript, please distinguish titles clearly<br />
from other paragraphs. Titles and subtitles should not he<br />
numbered. Avoid using letters to number subtitles. Use lowercase<br />
letters for names. Do not underline any words. In English.<br />
there is one space after punctuation. none before.<br />
Copy editing of manuscripts is performed by the journal.<br />
Each author's address should be specified. The first time. please<br />
state the complete address of the correspondent author to whom<br />
the proofs should be sent.<br />
Abstract, key-words, abridged version<br />
Ahstracts should be no longer than 300 words. The English<br />
abridged version should not exceed onc page (1000 words). Do<br />
not use more than six key-words (translated in the abstraet's<br />
language). Key-words should not be present in the title.<br />
Instructions to authors<br />
References<br />
All puhlications quoted in the text should be presented in a list<br />
of references following the text. The list of references should be<br />
arranged alphahetically hy author and chronologically per<br />
author. You should abbreviate the titles of periodicals in the list<br />
of references (except if you arc not sure of it). Make sure that all<br />
citations and references correspond. Use the following system<br />
for references:<br />
- journal article:<br />
Andow D.A.. Karieva P.. Levin S.A. & Okubo A.. 1990. Spread<br />
of invading organisms. .J. Ecol.. 4 : 177-188.<br />
- book:<br />
Harper J.L., 1977. Population hiology of' plants. Academic<br />
Press, London. 300 p.<br />
- book section:<br />
May R.M., 1989. Levels of organisation in ecology. In : Cherret<br />
J.M. (cd.). Ecological concepts. Blackwell Scientific Public..<br />
Oxford: 339-363.<br />
- conference proceedings:<br />
Grootaert P., 1984. Biodiversity in insects, speeiation and<br />
behaviour in Diptera. In: Hoffmann M. & Van del' Vekcn P.<br />
(eds.), Proceedings oj'the sVl11posiul11 on " Riodiversitv: studv,<br />
exploration, conservation ". Ghcnt, 18 November 1992: 121<br />
141.<br />
Citations in-text<br />
The words « figures» and « tables» announced in-tcxt should<br />
he written in extenso and in lower-case letters. In the text. refer<br />
to thc author's name and year of publication (followed by pages<br />
only if it is a quotation). If a publication is written by more than<br />
two authors. the name of the first author should be used<br />
followed hy « et al. » (this indication, however, should never be<br />
used in the list of references: first author and co-authors should<br />
be mentioned). Examples: «Since Dupont (1962) has shown<br />
that. .. ». or « This is in agreement with previous results (Durand<br />
et Ill., 1990 ; Dupond & Dupont, 1(97) ... ».<br />
Abbreviation, Latin words<br />
Explanation of a technical abbreviation is required when first<br />
used. Intcrnational convention codes for nomenclature should<br />
be used. Latin words should he in italics (et al.. a priori, ete.).<br />
particularly for taxonomic classifications (the first time, please<br />
state the author's name: for example. Olea elfropllea Linnee).<br />
Figures and tables<br />
All illustrations should he submitted separately and they should<br />
be preceded by thc figure and table legends on a separate page.<br />
Figures and tables should he sent «rcady to be printed ».<br />
without need to be reduced (so their size should be 16 x 22 cm<br />
or 8 x 22 cm maximum). All the illustrations being in-text<br />
should he quoted, numbered in sequence and should have a<br />
legend. Computerised tables' columns should not be represented<br />
by signs ( : or I ).<br />
Reprints<br />
Twenty-five reprints will he supplied frce of charge. 8y request.<br />
additional reprints can be orclered with a charge.
ecologia <strong>mediterranea</strong><br />
SOMMAIRE<br />
Tome <strong>25</strong> fascicule 2,<strong>1999</strong><br />
J. A. TORRES, A. GARCIA-FUENTES, C. SALAZAR, E. CANO & F. VALLE - Caracterizaci6n de<br />
los pinares de Pil1l1s halepellsis Mill. en el sur de la Peninsula lberica 135<br />
Y. B. LlNHART. L. CHAOUNI-BENABDALLAH, J.-M. PARRY & J. D. THOMPSON - Selective<br />
herbivory of thyme chemotypes by a mollusk and a grasshopper 147<br />
M. VfLA & I. MUNOZ - Patterns and correlates of exotic and endemic plant taxa in the Balearic islands 153<br />
A. AIDOUD, H. SLLMANI, F. AlDOUD-LOUN1S & J. TOUFFET - Changements edaphiques le long<br />
d'un gradient d'intensite de piiturage dans une steppe d'Algerie 163<br />
M. ABD EL-GHANI - Soil variables affecting the vegetation of inland western desert of Egypt 173<br />
R. BESSAH, F. ROZE & D. NEDJRAOUI - Activite cellulolytique ill vilro de sols de deux steppes it<br />
alfa (Slipa tellllcissima L.) d' Algerie 185<br />
J. GUIOT, F. TORRE, R. CHEDDADJ. O. PEYRON, P. TARASOV, D. JOLLY, J.O. & KAPLAN <br />
The climate of the Mediterranean Basin and of Eurasia of the last glacial maximum as reconstruclcd by<br />
inverse vegetation modelling and pollen data 193<br />
O. MADON, S. GACHET & M. BARBERO - Innuence of study scale on the characterisation of plants<br />
community organisation in a Mediterranean grassland (Mont Ventoux, France) 205<br />
Analyses d'ouvrages 215<br />
Indexe dans BIOSIS et PASCAL (CNRS)