54. Volume 12- Number 4 - IP Australia

INCLUDES CUMULATIVE INDEX TO TO VOLUMES 1 1 - 12 - 12 

Plant Varieties 

Journal 

Quarter Four 1999 Volume 12 Number 4 

‘Korsetag’ – A year 2000 release Cut Flower variety 

Official Journal of Plant Breeders Rights Australia

Treloars are the Australian Agent for W. Kordes & Sons 

of Germany, who are recognised worldwide as leaders in 

producing new garden and cut flower varieties. 

The following Kordes varieties are protected under Plant Breeders Rights: 

Variety Synonym Type Applic No. 

KORSCHWAMA Black Madonna Hybrid Tea 94/094 

KORCRISETT Calibra Cut Flower 94/090 

KOROMTAR Cream Dream Cut Flower 97/204 

KORSORB Cubana Cut Flower 91/052 

KORMILLER Dream Cut Flower 96/076 

KORTANKEN Domstadt Fulda Floribunda 96/082 

KORILIS Eliza Cut Flower 96/077 

KORAZERKA Ekstase Hybrid Tea 96/078 

KORGENOMA Emely Cut Flower 97/207 

KORCILMO Escimo Cut Flower 94/093 

KORFISCHER Hansa-Park Shrub 96/085 

KOROKIS Kiss Cut Flower 89/132 

KORVERPEA Kleopatra Hybrid Tea 96/084 

KORDABA Lambada Cut Flower 94/089 

KORSULAS Limona Cut Flower 97/203 

KORBOLAK Melody Cut Flower 89/129 

KORRUICIL Our Esther Cut Flower 97/205 

KORANDERER Our Copper Queen Hybrid Tea 97/201 

SPEKES Our Sacha Cut Flower 96/080 

KORPLASINA Our Vanilla Cut Flower 96/081 

KORBASREN Pink Bassino Ground Cover 96/087 

KORMAREC Sommerabend Ground Cover 96/086 

KORPINKA Summer Fairytale Ground Cover 94/088 

KORVESTAVI Sunny Sky Cut Flower 97/200 

KORMADOR Tamara Cut Flower 89/131 

KORBACOL Texas Cut Flower 94/092 

KORKUNDE Toscana Cut Flower 89/130 

KORHOCO Vital Cut Flower 97/206 

PBR applied for on the following varieties: 

KORDREKES Cut Flower 99/204 

KORFLEUR Cut Flower 99/201 

KORKULARIS Cut Flower 99/202 

KORLUMARA Cut Flower 99/199 

KORMEERAM Cut Flower 99/200 

KORROGILO Cut Flower 99/105 

KORSETAG Cut Flower 99/203 

Please contact us for further information on these excellent new varieties 

“Midwood”, Portland VIC 3305. Phone: (03) 5529 2367. Fax: (03) 5529 2511 

E-mail: roses@iconnect.net.au 

Website: treloar-roses.com.au

PLANT VARIETIES JOURNAL 1999 VOL 12 NO. 4 


Journal 

QUARTER FOUR, 1999 VOLUME 12 NUMBER 4 

Part 1 – General Information 

Objections 2 

Applying for Plant Breeders Rights 2 

Requirement to Supply Comparative Varieties 2 

UPOV Developments 2 

Instructions to Authors 2 

Important Changes – Amendments to the PBR Act 5 

– Herbarium Specimen 5 

– Current PBR Forms 5 

– Overseas Testing/Data 6 

– Descriptions from the Voluntary Cereal 

Registration Scheme 7 

– Staff 7 

Part 2 – Public Notices 

Varieties Included in this Issue 7 

Acceptances 10 

Descriptions 15 

Key to symbols 15 

Grants 98 

Applications Varied 102 

Applications Withdrawn 102 

Grants Surrendered 102 

Change in Assignment 103 

Corrigenda 103 

Appendix 1 – Fees 103 

Appendix 2 – List of PBRAC members 105 

Appendix 3 – Index of Accredited Consultant ‘Qualified Persons’ 105 

Appendix 4 – Index of Accredited Non-Consultant ‘Qualified 

Persons’ 111 

Appendix 5 – Addresses of UPOV and Member States 111 

Appendix 6 – Centralised Testing Centres 114 

Appendix 7 – List of Plant Classes for Denomination Purposes 117 

Appendix 8 – Register of Plant Varieties 118 

Varietal Descriptions from the Voluntary Cereal Registration 

Scheme 119 

Cumulative Index – Plant Varieties Journal 121 

Cumulative Index – Voluntary Cereal Registration Scheme 194 

SUBSCRIPTION ENQUIRIES AND ADVERTISING SHOULD BE ADDRESSED TO: 

PLANT BREEDERS RIGHTS AUSTRALIA 

Department of Agriculture, Fisheries and Forestry – Australia 

GPO Box 858, Canberra ACT 2601 

Telephone: (02) 6272 4228 Facsimile: (02) 6272 3650 

Homepage: http://www.affa.gov.au/agfor/pbr/pbr.html 

CLOSING DATE FOR ISSUE VOL 13 NO 1: March 17, 2000. 

Anticipated closing date for other 2000 issues: Vol 13 No 2: June 16, 2000. 

Vol 13 No 3: September 15, 2000. Vol 13 No 4 December 15, 2000. 

Citation: Anon (1999). Plant Varieties Journal. Editors, Hossain T, Hulse N, Prakash K, 

Costa H, Waterhouse D, Dawes-Read K, Kingdom S, December 1999, 12(4). 

Acknowledgments: Lyn Craven, Australian National Herbarium, Division of Plant 

Industry, CSIRO for assistance with scientific names; Iain Dawson, Australian Cultivar 

Registration Authority for scientific advice; Roger Spencer, Royal Botanic Gardens, 

Melbourne and Greenlife Database for assistance with varietal names. 

This work is copyright©. Apart from any use as permitted under the Copyright Act 1968, no part may be 

reproduced without written permission. Inquiries should be directed to the Registrar, Plant Breeders Rights 

ISSN: 1030–9748 

Printed by National Capital Printing, Fyshwick, ACT 

Doug Waterhouse 

Registrar 

Bob Blazey 

Policy Development 

Tanvir Hossain 

Examiner 

Kathryn Dawes-Read 

Administration Officer 

Nik Hulse 

Deputy Registrar 

Katte Prakash 

Examiner 

Helen Costa 

Examiner 

S. (Angie) Kingdom 

Resource Co-ordinator 

1



Objections 

Formal objections to applications can be lodged by a 

person who: 

a) considers their commercial interests would be 

affected by a grant of PBR to the applicant; and 

b) considers that the applicant will not be able to fulfil 

all the conditions for the grant of PBR to the variety. 

A person submitting a formal objection must provide 

supporting evidence to substantiate the claim. A copy of the 

submission will also be sent to the applicant and the latter 

will be asked to show why the objection should not be 

upheld. 

A fee of $100 is payable at the time of lodging a formal 

objection and $75/hour will be charged if the examination 

of the objection by the PBR office takes more than 2 hours. 

(See Appendix 1 for more details on PBR fees) 

Comments. Any person may make comment on the 

eligibility of any application for PBR, free of charge. If 

requested a comment will be kept confidential. If the 

comment is soundly based the person may be requested to 

lodge a formal objection. Comments may also be made 

regarding the name of a variety if it is believed to be 

scandalous or offensive. 

All formal objections and comments must be lodged with 

the Registrar not later than six months after the date the 

description of the variety is published in this journal. 

Applying For Plant Breeders 

Rights 

Applications are accepted from the original breeder of a 

new variety (from their employer if the breeder is an 

employee) or from a person who has acquired ownership 

from the original breeder. Overseas breeders need to 

appoint an agent to represent their interests in Australia. 

Interested parties should contact the PBR office and an 

accredited Qualified Person (Appendix 3) experienced in 

the plant species in question. 

Requirement to Supply 

Comparative Varieties 

Once an application has been accepted by the PBR office, it 

is covered by provisional protection. Also it immediately 

becomes a ‘variety of common knowledge’ and thus may be 

required by others as a comparator for their applications 

with a higher application number. 

Applicants are reminded that they are required to release 

propagative material for comparative testing provided that 

the material is used for no other purpose and all material 

relating to the variety is returned when the trial is complete. 

The expenses incurred in the provision of material for 

comparative trials is borne by those conducting the trials. 

As the variety is already under provisional protection, any 

use outside the conditions outlined above would qualify as 

an infringement and would be dealt with under section 53 

of the Plant Breeder’s Rights Act. 

Applicants having difficulties procuring varieties for use in 

comparative trials are urged to contact the PBR office 

immediately. 

UPOV Developments 

Information on UPOV and its activities is available on the 

INTERNET located at http://www.upov.int 

Australia verified the conformity of the PBR Act with the 

1991 revision of the UPOV Convention by depositing an 

instrument of accession with the Secretary General of 

UPOV on 20 December 1999. 

The complete list UPOV member states with their address 

and current status of ratification is given in Appendix 5. 

Instruction to Authors: New 

Format for Preparing Varietal 

Description 

We have introduced a new format for the varietal 

description. This new format replaces the long and short 

descriptions with a single, comprehensive description, 

which will be known as the Detailed Description. 

We believe it will be easier for the Qualified Persons to 

work on one description instead of two. These savings will 

lower costs and improve the ease with which varieties move 

through the scheme. 

However we are also suggesting additional information be 

included in the description eg. how comparators were 

selected (or rejected) and more information on the origin 

and breeding. This will reduce the likelihood of public 

comments or objection on the distinctness, novelty and the 

origin of the variety. 

The Detailed Description will be a comprehensive 

summary of the variety’s characteristics together with its 

origin and distinctive features presented under the 

following headings: 

• Details of the Application 

• Characteristics 

• Origin and Breeding 

2


• Choice of Comparator(s) 

• Comparative Trial 

• Prior Applications and Sales 

• Name of the person who prepared the description 

• Comparative Table 

• At the discretion of the QP/Applicant, scientific 

papers and other relevant information/publications 

can be appended to the detailed description 

Please note that the PBR office retains editorial control for 

all published material. Accordingly there may be instances 

when non-critical portions of a description (eg particularly 

verbose methodologies or appendices) are not published, 

although they do remain part of the detailed description. In 

some cases some non-distinct characteristics presented in a 

table may be omitted for publication. 

Following are some notes for preparing descriptions under 

the above headings with some examples: 

Details of the Application 

This will include the common name of the species; the 

correct botanical name; name and synonym (if any) of the 

variety; application number and the acceptance date; details 

of the applicant; details of the agent (if any). 

For consistency, botanical and common names should 

follow those of: Hortus Third, Staff of the LH Bailey 

Hortorium, Macmillan Publishing Company, 1976; Census 

of Australian Vascular Plants, RJ Hnatiuk, AGPS, 1990; 

The Smart Gardeners Guide to Common Names of Plants, 

M Adler, Rising Sun Press, 1994; A Checklist of Economic 

Plants in Australia, CSIRO, 1994; Australian Plant Name 

Index, Australian Biological Resources Study, AGPS, 1991. 

Example 1 

COMMON NAME OF THE SPECIES 

Genus species 

‘Variety’ syn Synonym (if applicable) 

Application No: xx/xxx Accepted: dd month year. 

Applicant: Applicant’s Name, Town, State 

(abbreviation) and Country (if not Australia). 

Agent: Agent’s Name, Town, State (abbreviation). 

Characteristics 

Characteristics should be described in the following order: 

Plant, Stem, Leaf, Inflorescence, Flower and flower parts, 

Fruit and fruit parts, Seed, Other characters (disease 

resistance, stress tolerance, quality etc). Characters within 

subheadings should generally be in the following order: 

habit, height, length, width, size, shape, colour (RHS colour 

chart reference with edition), other. Use a concise 

taxonomic style in which subheadings are followed by a 

colon and characters are separated by a comma. Where 

there is a UPOV technical guideline available make sure 

that the asterisk characteristics are included in the 

description. 

Example 2 

Characteristics (Table nn, Figure nn) Plant: habit 

narrow bushy, height medium, early maturing. Stem: 

anthocyanin absent, internodes short. Leaf: length long, 

width narrow, variegation present, predominant colour 

green (RHS 137A), secondary margin colour pale greenyellow 

(RHS 1A). Inflorescence: corymb. Flower: early, 

pedicel short, diameter small (average 12.5mm), petals 

5, petal colour yellow (RHS 12A), sepals 5 … etc (Note: 

give the reference for the edition of RHS colour chart 

used, eg. all RHS colour chart numbers refer to 1986 

edition) 

Origin and Breeding 

Indicate how the variety was originated, ie. controlled 

pollination, open pollination, induced mutation, 

spontaneous mutation, introduction and selection, seedling 

selection etc. Give the name of the parents. Also give the 

characteristics of the parental material by which they differ 

from the candidate variety. Briefly describe the breeding 

procedure and selection criteria used in developing the new 

variety. Also indicate the mode of propagation used during 

breeding. Give the name(s) of the breeder. 

Example 3 

Origin and Breeding Controlled pollination: seed 

parent S90-502-1 x pollen parent S90-1202-1. The seed 

parent was characterised by early flowering, dark green 

non-variegated leaves and compact bushy habit. The 

pollen parent was characterised by late flowering, 

variegated leaves and narrow bushy habit. Hybridisation 

took place in , in . From 

this cross, seedling number S 3736 was chosen in 1993 

on the basis of flowering time. Selection criteria: 

variegated leaves, compact bushy habit and early 

flowering. Propagation: a number mature stock plants 

were generated from this seedling through tissue culture 

and were found to be uniform and stable. The ‘Variety’ 

will be commercially propagated by vegetative cuttings 

from the stock plants. Breeder: , , 

. 

Example 4 

Origin and Breeding Introduction and selection: 5 

cycles of selection within 

originating from and supplied by 

the under a materials transfer 

agreement. When grown CI2204 was heterogeneous 

with both hooded and non-hooded types and differences 

in seed colour. Repeated selection for hooded types 

produced seven breeding lines (726.1-726.7) which were 

evaluated for forage and seed production potential. From 

these lines, an uniform single line known as 726.2.1 was 

selected to become ‘Variety’. Selection criteria: seedling 

vigour, dry matter yield, uniformly hooded (awnless), 

seed colour (black). Propagation: by seed. Breeder: 

, , . 

Choice of Comparators 

As choosing the most appropriate comparators may be the 

most crucial part of the trial, we suggest the QPs do more 

3


research and record their decisions before making the final 

selection. Under this heading briefly indicate what factors 

you have considered in choosing the comparator(s) for the 

trial. It is strongly recommended that the parental materials 

or the source germplasm is included in the trial for 

comparison purposes. If the parents are excluded indicate 

the reason(s). 

Example 5 

Choice of Comparators ‘Comparator 1’, ‘Comparator 

2’ and ‘Comparator 3’ were initially considered for the 

comparative trial as these are similar varieties of 

common knowledge. ‘Comparator 1’ is a widely 

available commercial variety of the same species, 

however it has non variegated leaves. Therefore it was 

excluded from the trial. ‘Comparator 2’, was chosen for 

its variegated leaves and ‘Comparator 3’ was chosen for 

its compact growth habit and variegated leaves. The 

parents were not considered for the trial because the 

‘Variety’ is clearly distinguishable from the seed parent 

by its variegated leaves and from the pollen parent by 

flowering time and growth habit. 

Example 6 

Choice of Comparators ‘Comparator 1’ was chosen 

because it is the original source material from which the 

variety was selected. Comparator 2’ was selected for its 

similarity with the ‘Variety’ in seed colour. No other 

similar varieties of common knowledge have been 

identified. 

Comparative Trial 

List the varieties or forms used as comparators – the most 

similar varieties/forms of common knowledge. State the 

location and date of the trial. Give relevant details on 

propagation, pot/plot size and type, growing medium, 

chemical treatments, lighting, irrigation, or management 

which may be necessary to repeat the trials. State the type 

of trial design used, the total number of specimens in the 

trial and how they were arranged. State the number of 

specimens from which measurements/observations were 

taken. Also indicate how the specimen was selected and the 

sampling regime. 

Example 7 

Comparative Trial : Comparator(s): ‘Comparator 2’, 

‘Comparator 3’. Location: Carrum Downs, VIC 

(Latitude 38º06´ South, elevation 35m), summer-autumn 

1996/97. Conditions: trial conducted in a polyhouse, 

plants propagated from cutting, rooted cuttings planted 

into 210mm pots filed with soilless potting mix (pine 

bark base), nutrition maintained with slow release 

fertilisers, pest and disease treatments applied as 

required. Trial design: fifteen pots of each variety 

arranged in a completely randomised design. 

Measurements: from ten plants at random. One sample 

per plant. 

Prior Applications and Sales 

Indicate the prior overseas applications with Country, Year 

of lodgement, Current status and Name applied in the 

following format. 

Example 8 

Country Year Current Status Name Applied 

Germany 1994 Granted ‘Variety’ 

Denmark 1994 Granted ‘Variety’ 

Also indicate date and country of first sale and date of first 

sale in Australia. 

Example 9 

First sold in Germany in 1994. First Australian sale nil. 

Name of the person who prepared the description 

Name and address of the person who prepared the 

description. It is preferable that the description be prepared 

by the Qualified Person or at the very least the draft has 

been seen and approved by the QP before final submission. 

Please note that it is a responsibility of the QP under the 

PBR Act to verify the particulars of the detailed description 

are accurate. 

Example 10 

Description: Name, Company (optional), Town/suburb, 

State (abbreviated) 

Comparative Table 

While preparing the table NEVER use the “table creating 

features” of word processing packages as they insert hidden 

formatting blocks that are difficult to remove before 

publication. Instead, use single tabs to align columns. 

NEVER use drawing objects to create lines, boxes or 

shading. Instead use the underscore character ( _ ) to create 

lines for tables. Tables should normally be either 8.5cm 

wide (half page) or 17.5cm wide (full page). If necessary a 

very wide table can be presented in landscape orientation. 

Please note the following points when preparing the 

comparative table: 

• The candidate variety is always on the left of the table. 

If the same table is used for two or more candidate 

varieties, the candidate varieties are arranged in order of 

application numbers, higher application number to the 

left of the table. Comparators are always to the right of 

the candidate(s). 

• Arrange the characteristics in order – this should be the 

same as the order in the UPOV technical guidelines for 

the species. Please ensure that each characteristics 

marked with an asterisk is included. 

• If a UPOV technical guideline is not available use the 

order same as in the text part: Plant, Stem, Leaf, 

Inflorescence, Flower, Flower parts, Fruit, Fruit parts, 

Seed, special characters etc. 

• For measured characteristics Mean, Standard Deviation, 

Least Significant Difference (LSD)*at P≤0.01 is 

mandatory. 

• When quoting significant differences please give the 

level of probability in the following format: P≤0.001, 

P≤0.01, or ns. 

• For discrete characters do not use scores. Please give a 

word description. eg. round, medium, tall etc. 

• For ranked characteristics just give the numbers, do not 

use ‘normal’ statistical analysis. Non-parametric 

statistical procedures may be used in such cases. 

4

PBR AMENDMENTS 


• Use only the number of significant decimal places 

appropriate to the level of accuracy of the observations. 

* If there are two or more candidate varieties, use range 

tests rather than an LSD, such as Duncan’s Multiple 

Range Test or any other appropriate multiple range test. 

Enter the grouping characters as alphabet superscripts. 

Completed Part 2 Applications should be sent to: 

Plant Breeders Rights Australia 

Department of Agriculture, Fisheries and Forestry – 

Australia 

GPO Box 858 CANBERRA ACT 2601 

To facilitate editing, descriptions may also be sent via E- 

mail to: Tanvir.Hossain@affa.gov.au or PBR@affa.gov.au 

Note: a signed copy of the Part 2 application along with the 

examination fee, one slide or photograph must also be sent 

by post. 

Important Changes 

AMENDMENTS TO THE PBR ACT 

Temporary amnesty for applicants caught in the 

change from 6 to 4 years of prior sale 

When the PBR Act was introduced it replaced the 

previous Plant Variety Rights Act 1987 and in doing so 

reduced the allowable period of prior sale for many new 

plant varieties from 6 years to 4 years. Following 

introduction of the current Act many applicants applied 

only to find that their allowable period for prior sale had 

expired up to two years earlier. To rectify this anomaly 

an amendment to the PBR Act has been passed and 

received royal assent on 10th December 1999. The new 

transitional arrangement will allow affected applicants 

the opportunity to have their applications reinstated. To 

take advantage of this transitional arrangement an 

application for a new variety must have been lodged and 

subsequently rejected only because it was first sold 

overseas between 10th November 1988 and 9th 

November 1990. To ensure efficient operation, any 

claims under this provision must be lodged within 6 

months of its commencement (i.e. before 10th June 

2000). 

Any person who believes that their variety may meet 

these temporary provisions can, if they wish, contact the 

PBR Office to discuss whether their variety is likely to 

be eligible. 

Other Amendments 

In addition to the above, 11 other amendments to the 

PBR Act were also passed. Most are fairly minor and 

aimed at improving the efficiency of the PBR office. The 

changes will probably be of little consequence for most 

applicants and QP’s. Further information regarding the 

likely effect and operation of these amendments can be 

obtained by contacting the PBR office. 

• The time limit in which to advise the PBR office of 

any change in assignment of rights has been 

extended from 7 days to within 30 days. Likewise the 

PBR office now has 30 days in which to notify all 

parties of a change in assignment. 

• Before an objection, request for revocation or claim 

of essential derivation can be accepted by the PBR 

office it must be accompanied by the prescribed fee. 

• Who bears the cost of a test growing in dealing with 

a request for revocation of a PBR has changed. If 

revocation action is successful, the grantee bears the 

cost otherwise costs are borne by the objector. 

• The PBR office can now recover full costs of 

undertaking a test growing of a variety on behalf of 

another UPOV country where no application is 

lodged in Australia. 

• It is no longer a requirement for the PBR office to 

maintain a copy of the Register of Plant Varieties in 

each State and Territory. 

The remaining changes are very minor and correct or 

clarify existing provisions. That a variety is ineligible for 

protection if it has been sold for more than one year in 

Australia or 4 to 6 years overseas has been clarified to 

avoid misinterpretation. An error in the placement of 

‘initial variety’ in subsection 50(5) has been corrected. It 

has also been clarified that, if not already specified in the 

Act, the time, circumstances and manner in which 

prescribed fees are paid may be specified in the 

regulations. 

HERBARIUM SPECIMENS 

It is a requirement of the PBR Act that, for all native 

species, a suitable specimen be sent to the Australian 

Cultivar Registration Authority (ACRA). The processing of 

these specimens attracts a fee from ACRA (currently $50). 

Payment of the fee should be sent directly to ACRA along 

with the specimen and a completed ‘ACRA Herbarium 

Specimen’ (Herb1) form. 

CURRENT PBR FORMS 

The official forms for PBR purposes are periodically 

updated. A list of current PBR forms with their numbers and 

date of last update is given below. When a form is updated, 

the month and the year of the last update follow the form 

number within parentheses. For example, Form P1 was last 

updated in September 1998 and therefore this form gets a 

designation of Form P1 (9/98). We also encourage you to 

consult the ‘Guidelines for Completing Part 1 Application 

Form’ before filing in the Part 1 Application. To avoid delays 

we suggest that you use the latest version of the forms. 

The Part 2 form has been updated in May 1999 to include 

the information on the “Confirmation of Submission of 

Propagating Material to a Genetic Resource Centre”. 

Previously this was a separate form to be filled in at the time 

of final granting of PBR. We now encourage that the 

information on Genetic Resource Centre is given at the time 

of the Part 2 submission to avoid any delay to process the 

application at the final granting stage. 

If you do not have the latest version of the form(s), please 

contact the PBR office. Alternatively, forms can be 

downloaded from the PBR web site at 

http://www.affa.gov.au/agfor/pbr/pbr.html 

5


Name of Form Form Number Last Updated 

Application for Plant Breeders Rights Form P1 September 1998 


Guidelines for Completing Part1 Part1ins September1998 

Application Form 

Application for Plant Breeders Rights Form P2 May 1999 

Part 2 – Description of New Variety 

Nomination of a Qualified Person Form QP 1 April 1999 

Certification by a Qualified Person Form QP 2 April 1999 

Proposed Variety Names Form DEN1 December 1995 

Extension of Provisional Protection Form EXT2 December 1999 

Exemption of a Taxon from Farm saved seed Form ET1 September 1998 

Status of Application Form STAT 1 November 1995 

ACRA Herbarium Specimen Form Herb 1 October 1997 

Overseas Testing/Data 

The PBR Act allows DUS data produced in other countries 

(overseas data) be used in lieu of conducting a comparative 

trial in Australia provided certain conditions relating to the 

filing of applications, sufficiency of the data and the 

likelihood that the candidate variety will express the 

distinctive characteristic(s) in the same way when grown 

locally. Briefly the overseas data could be considered 

where: 

• The first PBR application relating to the candidate 

variety has been lodged overseas, and 

• the variety has previously been test grown in a UPOV 

member country using official UPOV test guidelines 

and test procedures, (ie. equivalent to a comparative trial 

in Australia) and 

• either, all the most similar varieties of common 

knowledge (including those in Australia) have been 

included in the overseas DUS trial, or 

• the new overseas variety is so clearly distinct from all 

the Australian varieties of common knowledge that 

further DUS test growing is not warranted, and 

• sufficient data and descriptive information is available 

to publish a description of the variety in an accepted 

format in Plant Varieties Journal; and to satisfy the 

requirements of the PBR Act. 

The Qualified Person, in consultation with the 

agent/applicant, and perhaps other specialists and 

taxonomists, will need to evaluate the overseas data, test 

report and photographs to see if the application does fulfil 

all PBR Office requirements, and then advise the 

agent/applicant: 

• either, to submit Part 2 incorporating a description for 

publication, any additional data and photographs and to 

pay the examination fee; 

• or, to conduct a DUS trial in Australia, recommending to 

the applicant/agent which additional varieties of 

common knowledge to include; 

• or, submit Part 2 including additional data (information 

about similar varieties in Australia to show that they are 

clearly distinct from the candidate variety that a further 

DUS test growing including the similar varieties is not 

warranted and that the variety displays the distinctive 

characteristics when grown in Australia) 

Please note that the PBR office does not obtain overseas 

DUS test reports on behalf of applicants. It is the sole 

responsibility of the applicants to obtain these reports 

directly from the relevant overseas testing authorities. 

Where applicants already have the report they are advised to 

submit a certified true copy of the report with the Part 1 

application. Applicants, or those duly authorised, may 

certify the copy. 

If you do not have the test report available at the time of 

Part-1 application then you are advised to submit the Part-1 

application without the test report. However, you should 

make arrangements to procure the DUS test report directly 

from the relevant testing authority. When the report 

becomes available, a certified copy should be supplied to 

the QP and the PBR office. 

When the trial is based on an UPOV technical guideline and 

test report in an official UPOV language (English, German 

or French), it can be lodged in support of the application. In 

other cases the test reports must be in English. 

The applicant/agent and Qualified Person should use the 

overseas test report to complete Part 2 of the application, 

making a decision on how to proceed in view of the 

completeness of the information, the comparators (if any) 

used in the overseas DUS trial and their knowledge of 

similar Australian varieties that may not have been included 

in the overseas test report. 

If a description is based on an overseas test report, 

Australian PBR will not be granted until after the decision 

to grant PBR in the country producing the DUS test is 

made. The final decision on the acceptability of overseas 

data rest with the PBR office. 

6


Descriptions from the Voluntary 

Cereal Registration Scheme 

The Plant Varieties Journal now includes descriptions of 

cultivars registered under the Voluntary Cereal Registration 

Scheme. Please note that the publication of these 

descriptions in the Plant Varieties Journal does not qualify 

the cultivars to be protected under Plant Breeder’s Rights 

(PBR). PBR is an entirely different scheme and there are 

certain requirements under the Plant Breeder’s Rights Act 

1994, which must be satisfied to be eligµible for registration 

under PBR. However, it is possible that some cultivars 

published under the voluntary scheme are also registered 

under PBR. When a cultivar is registered under both 

schemes, the current PBR status of the cultivar is indicated 

in the descriptions. For information on registering a new 

cereal cultivar under the voluntary scheme please refer to 

the ‘Cereal Registration Scheme’ section at the back of this 

issue. Please note there is no descriptions from the 

Voluntary Cereal Registration Scheme in this issue. 

Staff 

We would like to introduce Bob Blazey as the newest 

member of the PBR team. Bob has extensive experience in 

policy development and international issues. He will work 

on amendments to the PBR Act, matters raised through the 

PBR Advisory Committee, UPOV and industry/state 

liaison. 

Part 2 – Public Notices 

Varieties Included in this Issue 

Variety 

Page 

Number 

AGAPANTHUS 

‘Black Pantha’ A 98 

‘Variegated Wilken’ 10 

ALSTROEMERIA 

‘Ballet’ A 98 

‘Little Moon’ A 98 

‘Savannah’ 10 

‘Stabelin’ A syn Belinda A 98, 102 

‘Stalauli’ syn Laura 15, 102 

‘Staprimil’ A syn Emily A 98 

‘Staprimon’ A syn Monica A 98 

‘Staprinag’ A syn Ragna A 98 

‘Staprisis’ A syn Sissi A 98 

‘Staprizsa’ A syn Zsa Zsa A 98 

‘Starexan’ syn Xandra 16 

‘Stalibla’ syn White Libelle 102 

‘Stalilas’ syn Jubilee 102 

‘Stalvir’ syn Carola 102 

‘Staronic’ syn Veronica 102 

‘Starover’ syn Olivia 102 

‘Stapurzul’ syn Azula 102 

‘Stayeli’ syn Yellow Libella 102 

‘Testapink’ syn Pink Diamond 17, 102 

‘Virginia’ A 99 

APPLE 

‘Charlotte’ A 99 

‘Obelisk’ A syn Flamenco A 99 

ARROWLEAF CLOVER 

‘Cefalu’ 102 

ASTER 

‘Dark Milka’ 19 

‘Karmijn Milka’ 19 

‘Milka’ 20 

‘Peter’s White’ 21 

AVOCADO 

‘Llanos Hass’ 22 

BARLEY 

‘Cask’ 103 

‘Doolup’ A 99 

‘Empress’ 103 

‘Wyalong’ A 99 

BORONIA 

‘Early Red’ 102 

‘Just Margaret’ 102 

‘Purple Jared’ 10 

BOX HONEYSUCKLE 

‘Paradise Royal Flush’ 23 

BRACHYSCOME 

‘Compact Amethyst’ 10 

BRUNFELSIA 

‘Sweet & Petite’ 23, 102 

BRUNSWICK GRASS 

‘Blue Eve’ 10 

CANOLA 

‘Charlton’ 24 

‘Ag Emblem’ 102 

7


Variety 

Page 


Variety 

Page 


‘Hylite 200 TT’ 25 

‘Purler’ 26 

‘Ripper’ 26, 102 

‘Surpass 600 TT’ 29 

‘Surpass 600’ 28 

CHICKPEA 

‘Bumper’ 102 

‘Gully’ 102 

COCKSFOOT 

‘Grasslands Excel’ 10, 30 

COMMON VETCH 

‘Morava’ 32 

COTTON 

‘DP 5690’ syn Linda 103 

‘DP 5415’ syn Blanca 103 

CRIMSON CLOVER 

‘Blaza’ 32 

CYPRESS, ITALIAN 

‘Gold Pillar’ 103 

CYPRESS, LEYLAND 

‘Ferngold’ 102 

DIANTHUS 

‘Codianki’ 10 

DIASCIA 

‘Codiach’ 11 

‘Codiape’ 11 

DURUM WHEAT 

‘4210.23.6’ 11 

‘Arrivato’ 11 

DWARF CHILLI 

‘Orange Bantam’ 33 

ERIOSTEMON 

‘Lime Delight’ 34 

EVENING PRIMROSE 

‘Ballerina Hot Pink’ syn Prima Donna 103 

FALSE FEATHER 

‘Victoria’ 11 

FIELD PEA 

‘Cooke’ 35 

‘Excell’ A 99, 103 

‘Helena’ 11, 36 

‘Mukta’ 37 

‘Parafield’ 38 

‘Paravic’ A 99, 103 

‘Santi’ 39 

‘Soupa’ 40 

FIG, WEEPING 

‘Marole’ A syn Bushy King A 99 

‘Mikkie’ A syn Bushy Prince A 99 

‘Twilight Beauty’ 102 

FLANNEL FLOWER 

‘Federation Star’ 102 

‘Starbright’ 41 

GAURA 

‘So white’ 42 

GREVILLEA 

‘Coastal Dawn’ 11 

‘Coastal Sunset’ 11 

HEBE 

‘Southern Skies’ 11 

‘Southern Sunrise’ 11 

HELIOTROPE 

‘Atlanta’ 11 

HOPS 

‘Furano No. 18’ A 99 

IMPATIENS 

‘Codiampca’ 11 

IMPATIENS, NEW GUINEA 

‘Kilyci’ syn Lycia 103 

KANGAROO PAW 

‘Bush Pearl’ 42 

KIWIFRUIT 

‘Tomua’ 43 

LAVENDER 

‘Bee Bright’ 11 

‘Bee Brilliant’ 11 

‘Bee Cool’ 11 

‘Bee Happy’ 11 

‘Bella Mauve’ 11 

‘Bella Pink’ 11 

‘Bella Purple’ 11 

‘Bella White’ 11 

‘Darling Crown’ 45 

‘Willowbridge Wings’ 46 

LILLY PILLY 

‘Elegance’ 47 

LILY 

‘Arena’ 102 

‘Bergamo’ 102 

‘Colonna’ 102 

‘Galilei’ 102 

‘Nippon’ 102 

‘Rosato’ 102 

‘Sartre’ 102 

‘Siberia’ A 99 

‘Spinoza’ 102 

LUCERNE 

‘Grasslands Torlesse’ 102 

‘Grasslands Kaituna’ A 99 

‘UQL-1’ 102 

‘Super 7’ 12 

‘Venus’ 12 

LUPIN 

‘Quilinock’ 12 

LUPIN, NARROW LEAFED 

‘Moonah’ A 99 

‘Tanjil’ A 99 

LUPIN, WHITE 

‘Ludet’ A 100 

‘Magna’ A 100 

‘Minibean’ A 100 

MANDEVILLA 

‘Guinevere’ 47 

MANGO 

‘B74’ 103 

‘Honey Gold’ A 100 

MARGUERITE DAISY 

‘Le Rosetta’ 102 

‘Polly Anna’ 102 

MOCK ORANGE 

‘Min-A-Min’ A 100 

8


Variety 

Page 


Variety 

Page 


NECTARINE 

‘Spring Sweet’ 102 

NEW SOUTH WALES CHRISTMAS BUSH 

‘Vic 90-1’ A 100 

OATS 

‘Bass’ A 100 

‘Heritage Lordship’ A 100 

‘Needilup’ A 100 

OSTEOSPERMUM 

‘Sunny Alex’ syn Alex 12 

‘Sunny Caroline’ syn Caroline 12 

‘Sunny Silvia’ syn Silvia 12 

‘Sunny Sonja’ syn Sonja 12 

PAPER DAISY 

‘Colourburst Gold’ 12 

‘NN-9812AE’ 12 

‘NN-B9821A’ 12 

‘NN-9892’ 12 

PEACE LILY 

‘Frederick’ A syn SPFR A 100 

‘Caroline’ 103 

PEACH 

‘Autumn Flame’ 102 

‘Sweet Dream’ 12 

PEACH ROOTSTOCK 

‘Viking’ 12 

PEAR 

‘Corinella’ 48 

PELARGONIUM 

‘PEL001’ 12 

PETUNIA 

‘Cobink’ 12 

‘Liricashower’ 102 

‘Liricashower Blue’ 102 

POINSETTIA 

‘Pepride’ 12 

‘Success’ 12 

‘Moni’ syn Red Fox Moni 102 

‘Peterstar Jingle Bells’ 102 

POLYGALA 

‘White Flamingo’ 13 

POTATO 

‘FL 1867’ 13, 49 

‘Gladiator’ 103 

‘Smith’s Astra’ A 100 

‘Smith’s Aurora’ A 100 

‘Smith’s Comet’ A 100 

‘Smith’s Orion’ A 100 

‘Smith’s Starlight’ 13 

‘Smith’s Stellar’ A 100 

PUMPKIN 

‘Dulong QHI’ 51 

RIVER WATTLE 

‘UY2’ 13 

‘UY3’ 13 

ROSE 

‘Baby Jack’ 53 

‘Benmable’ syn Benardella’s Waltz 54 

‘Benmech’ syn Kate’s Delight 102 

‘Benmfig’ syn Benardella’s Pearl 102 

‘Benmjul’ syn Benardella’s Ruby 55 

‘Betsy Taaffe’ A 100 

‘Brunintial’ syn Brundrett Centenary 103 

‘Golden Friendship’ syn Hartellody 103 

‘Grandalpha’ 13 

‘Jachipow’ syn Pretty in White 13 

‘Jachotam’ syn Pretty in Candy 13 

‘Jachotse’ syn Pretty in Yellow 13 

‘Jacmobli’ syn Pretty in Pink 13 

‘Jactemp’ syn Pretty in Red 13 

‘Jacshaq’ 13 

‘Lavflush’ syn Double Date 57 

‘Meihoto’ syn Sammi Minijet 59 

‘Meixemat’ 13 

‘Miehauzrey’ syn Bright Minijet 58 

‘My Sweet Honeycomb’ A 101 

‘Nirpeter’ 13 

‘Poulagun’ 13 

‘Poulberin’ 13 

‘Pouldace’ 13 

‘Pouldra’ 13 

‘Poulgrad’ 13 

‘Poulisab’ 13 

‘Poulmanti’ 13 

‘Poulna’ 14 

‘Poulorin’ 14 

‘Poulpear’ 14 

‘Poulsail’ 14 

‘Poulsiana’ 14 

‘Poulsolo’ 14 

‘Poulzin’ 14 

‘Red Iceberg’ 14 

‘Sunlampo’ syn Bellisima 14 

‘Sunpari’ syn La Parisienne 14 

‘Twoaebi’ 14 

‘Twojoan’ 14 

‘Twopaul’ 14 

‘Twoyel’ 14 

‘Wekplapic’ syn Centenary of Federation 14 

RYEGRASS, PERENNIAL 

‘Avalon’ A 101, 103 

SAND COUCH 

‘Ozlawn’ 14 

SCABOSIA 

‘Butterfly Blue’ 102 

‘Pink Mist’ 102 

SHEOAK, BLACK 

‘Matuka Silver’ A 101 

STATICE 

‘Cosita’ A 101 

STRAWBERRY 

‘Alinta’ A 101 

‘Cartuno’ A 101 

‘Euroka’ A 101 

‘Lowanna’ A 101 

‘Maroochy Blaze’ 60 

‘Maroochy Flame’ 60 

‘Maroochy Jewel’ 61 

‘Maroochy Starfire’ 62 

‘Maroochy Sundew’ 63 

‘Nonda’ A 101 

‘Sweet Charlie’ 63 

SUGARCANE 

‘Q176’ 67 

9


‘Q177’ 70 

‘Q178’ 73 

‘Q179’ 75 

‘Q180’ 78 

‘Q181’ 80 

‘Q182’ 83 

‘Q185’ 85 

SUTERA 

‘Bridal Showers’ 14 

‘Eight Bells’ 102 

‘Gold’n Pearls’ 14 

‘Knysna Hills’ 102 

‘Lavender Storm’ 14 

SYNGONIUM 

‘Gold Allusion’ A 101 

‘Maria Allusion’ A syn Cherry Allusion A 101 

‘White Holly’ A 101 

TEA TREE 

‘Dreamtime’ 14 

‘Love Affair’ 14 

‘Outrageous’ 14 

‘Pageant’ 15 

‘Rudolph’ 88 

‘White Wave’ 

TRITICALE 

‘Heritage Zephyr’ A 101 

VIOLA 

‘Major Primrose’ 102 

WAXFLOWER 

‘Eric John’ 103 

‘Jenny Jane’ 103 

‘Jubilee Jade’ 103 

‘Kismet’ 103 

‘Lady Jennifer’ 103 

‘Muchea Mauve’ 103 

‘Pearl Buttons’ 103 

‘Triumphant’ 103 

‘Variegated Blush’ 103 

‘White Spring’ 103 

WHEAT 

‘Ajana’ A 101 

‘Brennan’ A 101 

‘Dennis’ 15, 89 

‘Karlgarin’ 15 

‘Lang’ 15 

‘Petrie’ 15 

‘Stiletto’ 103 

‘Tennant’ A 101 

‘WW2449’ 15 

‘Wylah’ 15 

WHITE CLOVER 

‘Grasslands Bounty’ 15, 90 

WEIGELA 

‘Plangen’ 103 

ZONAL GERANIUM 

‘BFP-721 Bright Lilac’ syn Designer 

Bright Lilac 91, 102 

‘BFP-788 Bright Scarlet’ syn Designer 

Bright Scarlet 92, 102 

‘BFP-838 Dark Red’ syn Designer 

Dark Red 94, 102 

‘Pink Heart’ syn Showcase Pink Heart95, 102 

‘Showcase Salmon’ 96 

‘Starburst Red’ 97 

ACCEPTANCES 

The following varieties are under provisional protection 

from the date of acceptance. 

AGAPANTHUS 

Agapanthus praecox subsp orientalis 

‘Variegated Wilken’ 

Application No: 99/372 Accepted: 21 Dec 1999. 

Applicant: John Herbert Wilken, Silvan, VIC. 

Agent: Anthony Tesselaar Plants Pty Ltd. Silvan, VIC. 

ALSTROEMERIA 

Alstroemeria hybrid 

‘Savannah’ 


Applicant: Novosel’s Alstroemeria Pty Ltd, Lobethal, SA. 

BORONIA 

Boronia heterophylla x Boronia megastigma 

‘Purple Jared’ 


Applicant: The University of Western Australia, 

Nedlands, WA. 

BRACHYSCOME 

Brachyscome multifida 

‘Compact Amethyst’ 

Application No: 99/167 Accepted: 27 Oct 1999. 

Applicant: University of Sydney, Plant Breeding 

Institute, Cobbitty, NSW. 

BRUNSWICK GRASS 

Paspalum nicorae 

‘Blue Eve’ 


Applicant: Enviroseeds Pty Ltd, Mt Crosby, QLD. 

COCKSFOOT 

Dactylis glomerata 

‘Grasslands Excel’ 

Application No: 98/087 Accepted: 18 Nov 1999. 

Applicant: NZ Pastoral Agriculture Research Institute 

Ltd, Palmerston North, New Zealand. 

Agent: AgResearch Grasslands, Bowna via Albury, NSW. 

DIANTHUS 

Dianthus hybrid 

‘Codianki’ 




10

ACCEPTANCES 


DIASCIA 

Diascia hybrid 

‘Codiach’ 




‘Codiape’ 




DURUM WHEAT 

Triticum turgidum subsp durum 

‘Arrivato’ 


Applicant: NZ Institute for Crop & Food Research Ltd, 

Christchurch, New Zealand. 

Agent: Heritage Seeds Pty Ltd, Howlong, NSW. 

‘4210.23.6’ 


Applicant: NZ Institute for Crop & Food Research Ltd, 

Christchurch, New Zealand. 


FALSE FEATHER 

Cuphea hyssopifolia 

‘Victoria’ 


Applicant: Carolynn Milne, Alexandra Hills, QLD. 

FIELD PEA 

Pisum sativum 

‘Cooke’ 


Applicant: Chief Executive Officer, Agriculture Western 

Australia, South Perth, WA and Grains Research & 

Development Corporation, Barton, ACT. 

‘Helena’ 





GREVILLEA 

Grevillea hybrid 

‘Coastal Dawn’ 


Applicant: Ornatec Pty Ltd, Birkdale, QLD. 

‘Coastal Sunset’ 


Applicant: Ornatec Pty Ltd, Birkdale, QLD. 

HEBE 

Hebe hybrid 

‘Southern Skies’ 


Applicant: Bryan E Jackson, Dromana, VIC. 

‘Southern Sunrise’ 


Applicant: Bryan E Jackson, Dromana, VIC. 

HELIOTROPE 

Heliotropium arborescens 

‘Atlanta’ syn Atlantis 


Applicant: RW Rother, Monbulk, VIC. 

Agent: Tony Kebblewhite trading as Florabundance 

Wholesale Nursery, Verrierdale, QLD. 

IMPATIENS 

Impatiens walleriana 

‘Codiampca’ 




LAVENDER 

Lavandula stoechas 

‘Bee Bright’ 


Applicant: RJ Cherry, Kulnura, NSW. 

‘Bee Brilliant’ 



‘Bee Cool’ 



‘Bee Happy’ 



‘Bella Mauve’ 



‘Bella Pink’ 



‘Bella Purple’ 



‘Bella White’ 



11


LUCERNE 

Medicago sativa 

‘Super 7’ 


Applicant: South Australian Minister for Primary 

Industries, Natural Resources & Regional Development, 

Adelaide, SA. 

Agent: Heritage Seeds Pty Ltd, Mulgrave, VIC. 

‘Venus’ 


Applicant: Department of Agriculture for and on behalf 

of the State of New South Wales, Orange, NSW and 

Grains Research & Development Corporation, Barton, 

ACT and Australian Wool Research and Promotion 

Organisation, Parkville, VIC. 

Agent: South Australian Seedgrowers Cooperative, 

Hilton, SA. 

LUPIN 

Lupinus angustifolius 

‘Quilinock’ 





OSTEOSPERMUM 

Osteospermum ecklonis 

‘Sunny Alex’ syn Alex 


Applicant: Bjarne Larsen and Niels Larsen, Odense, 

Denmark. 

Agent: Redlands Nursery Pty Ltd, Redland Bay, QLD. 

‘Sunny Caroline’ syn Caroline 



Denmark. 


‘Sunny Silvia’ syn Silvia 



Denmark. 


‘Sunny Sonja’ syn Sonja 



Denmark. 


PAPER DAISY 

Bracteantha bracteata 

‘Colourburst Gold’ 



Institute, Cobbitty, NSW and Yellow Rock Native 

Nursery, Winmalee, NSW. 

‘NN-9812AE’ 


Applicant: AJ Newport and Son Pty Ltd, Winmalee, 

NSW. 

‘NN-B9821A’ 



NSW. 

‘NN-B9892’ 



NSW. 

PEACH 

Prunus persica 

‘Sweet Dream’ 


Applicant: Zaiger’s Inc. Genetics, Modesto, California, 

USA. 

Agent: Fleming’s Nurseries & Associates Pty Ltd, 

Monbulk, VIC. 

PEACH ROOTSTOCK 

Prunus hybrid 

‘Viking’ 


Applicant: Zaiger’s Inc. Genetics, Modesto, California, 

USA. 


Monbulk, VIC. 

PELARGONIUM 

Pelargonium tricolor 

‘PEL001’ 


Applicant: Frank Hammond, Narre Warren North,VIC. 

PETUNIA 

Petunia hybrid 

‘Cobink’ 




POINSETTIA 

Euphorbia pulcherrima 

‘Pepride’ 


Applicant: Paul Ecke Ranch, Encinitas, California, USA. 

Agent: AJ Newport & Son Pty Ltd, Winmalee, NSW. 

‘Success’ 


Applicant: Paul Ecke Ranch, Encinitas, California, USA. 

Agent: AJ Newport & Son Pty Ltd, Winmalee, NSW. 

12

ACCEPTANCES 


POLYGALA 

Polygala myrtifolia var. grandiflora 

‘White Flamingo’ 





POTATO 

Solanum tuberosum 

‘FL 1867’ 


Applicant: Frito-Lay Co, Rhinelander, Wisconsin, USA. 

Agent: The Smith’s Snackfood Company Ltd, 

Rydalmere, NSW. 

‘Smith’s Starlight’ 


Applicant: The Smith’s Snackfood Company Limited, 

Rydalmere, NSW. 

Agent: Agriculture Victoria Services Pty Ltd, Attwood, 

VIC. 

RIVER WATTLE 

Acacia cognata 

‘UY2’ 


Applicant: Austraflora Pty Ltd, Yarra Glen, VIC. 

‘UY3’ 


Applicant: Austraflora Pty Ltd, Yarra Glen, VIC. 

ROSE 

Rosa hybrid 

‘Grandalpha’ 


Applicant: Mr H Schreuders, Cranbourne, VIC. 

‘Jachipow’ syn Pretty in White 


Applicant: Bear Creek Gardens Inc., Delaware, USA. 

Agent: Swane Bros. Pty Ltd, Narromine, NSW. 

‘Jachotam’ syn Pretty in Candy 




‘Jachotse’ syn Pretty in Yellow 




‘Jacmobli’ syn Pretty in Pink 




‘Jacshaq’ 




‘Jactemp’ syn Pretty in Red 




‘Meixemat’ 


Applicant: Meilland International, Le Luc en Provence, 

France. 

Agent: H A Oakes and Son, Carrum Downs, VIC. 

‘Nirpeter’ 


Applicant: Lux Riviera srl, Late di Ventimiglia (IM), Italy. 

Agent: Grandiflora Nurseries Pty Ltd, Cranbourne, VIC. 

‘Poulagun’ 


Applicant: Poulsen Roser ApS, Central Point, Oregon, 

USA. 

Agent: Griffith Hack and Company, Melbourne, VIC. 

‘Poulberin’ 



USA. 


‘Pouldace’ 



USA. 


‘Pouldra’ 



USA. 


‘Poulgrad’ 



USA. 


‘Poulisab’ 



USA. 


‘Poulmanti’ 



USA. 


13


‘Poulna’ 



USA. 


‘Poulorin’ 



USA. 


‘Poulpear’ 



USA. 


‘Poulsail’ 



USA. 


‘Poulsiana’ 



USA. 


‘Poulsolo’ 



USA. 


‘Poulzin’ 



USA. 


‘Red Iceberg’ 


Applicant: Prophyl Pty Ltd, Austins Ferry, TAS & Swane 

Bros Pty Ltd, Dural, NSW. 

‘Sunlampo’ syn Bellisima 


Applicant: Frank Bart Schuurman, Whenuapia, New 

Zealand. 


‘Sunpari’ syn La Parisienne 


Applicant: Frank Bart Schuurman, Whenuapia, New 

Zealand. 


‘Twoaebi’ 


Applicant: Jeremiah Forster Twomey, Leucadia, 

California, USA. 

Agent: Anthony Tesselaar Plants Pty Ltd, Silvan, VIC. 

‘Twojoan’ 





‘Twopaul’ 





‘Twoyel’ 





‘Wekplapic’ syn Centenary of Federation 


Applicant: Weeks Wholesale Rose Grower, Inc., 



SAND COUCH 

Sporobolus virginicus 

‘Ozlawn’ 


Applicant: Todd Layt, Clarendon, NSW. 

SUTERA 

Sutera cordata 

‘Bridal Showers’ 


Applicant: Pixie Plants, Devon Meadows, VIC. 

‘Gold’n Pearls’ 





‘Lavender Storm’ 





TEA TREE 

Leptospermum hybrid 

‘Dreamtime’ 


Applicant: Peter Ollerenshaw, Bungendore, NSW. 

‘Love Affair’ 



‘Outrageous’ 



14

DESCRIPTIONS 


‘Pageant’ 



‘White Wave’ 



WHEAT 

Triticum aestivum 

‘Dennis’ 


Applicant: CSIRO Plant Industry, Canberra, ACT and 


ACT. 

‘Karlgarin’ 





‘Lang’ 


Applicant: State of Queensland through its Department 

of Primary Industries, Brisbane, QLD and Grains 

Research & Development Corporation, Barton, ACT. 

‘Petrie’ 


Applicant: State of Queensland through its Department 

of Primary Industries, Brisbane, QLD and Grains 

Research & Development Corporation, Barton, ACT. 

‘WW2449’ 





ACT. 

‘Wylah’ 





ACT. 

WHITE CLOVER 

Trifolium repens 

‘Grasslands Bounty’ 


Applicant: NZ Pastoral Agriculture Research Institute 

Ltd, Palmerston North, New Zealand. 

Agent: AgResearch Grasslands, Bowna via Albury, NSW. 


Key to definitions/symbols/words used in the detailed 

descriptions 

* = Variety used as comparator 

Agent = Australian agent acting on behalf of an 

applicant (usually where application is 

from overseas). 

ca. = about 

DMRT = Duncan’s Multiple Range Test 

DUS = Distinctiveness, Uniformity and Stability 

LSD = Least Significant Difference 

LSD/sig = The numerical value for the LSD (at 

P≤0.01) is in the first column and the 

level of significance between the 

candidate and the relevant comparator in 

subsequent columns 

PVJ = Plant Varieties Journal 

n/a = not available 

ns = not significant 

RHS = Royal Horticultural Society Colour Chart 

(Chip Number) 

std deviation = Standard deviation of the sample 

syn = synonym 

UPOV = International Union for the Protection of 

New Plant Varieties 

+ = When used in conjunction with an RHS 

colour, ‘+’ indicates a notional extension 

of a colour series when a precise match 

can not be made. It is most commonly 

used when the adjacent colour chip(s) are 

of a different sequence 

# = Values followed by the same letter are not 

significantly different at P≤0.01 

Origin = Unless otherwise stated the female parent 

of the cross precedes the male parent 

S-N-K test = Student-Newman-Keuls test 

A = variety(s) for which PBR has been 

granted 

ALSTROEMERIA 


‘Stalauli’ syn Laura 


Applicant: Van Staaveren BV, Aalsmeer, The Netherlands. 

Agent: F & I Baguley Flower and Plant Growers, 

Clayton South, VIC. 

Characteristics (Table 1, Figure 7) Plant: stem length long, 

stem thickness medium, density of foliage medium. Leaf: 

shape narrow elliptic, longitudinal axis of blade recurved, 

length medium, width medium. Inflorescence: umbel 

branch number medium, length long, pedicel length 

medium. Flower: colour red purple (red), size large, tepal 

spread medium, outer tepal shape broad obovate, depth of 

emargination deep, stripes absent, colour red purple RHS 

70B at centres and margins, red RHS 58B at apex and red 

purple RHS 70D at base, inner lateral tepals shape obovate, 

colour yellow RHS 5B-C at centre, red purple RHS 70D at 

base and red RHS 58A at apex; stripes few to medium; 

inner median tepal yellow colour absent;, stripes present. 

Stamens: filament red purple (red), spots absent, anther 

15


colour red brown (brownish). Ovary: anthocyanin slight 

(strong), style red purple, stigma red purple, spots absent. 

(Note: data in parenthesis denotes Dutch observations, all 

RHS numbers referred to in local observation were based 

on the 1986 edition). 

Origin and Breeding Controlled pollination: seed parent 

82R473-6 x pollen parent 86F1115-3 in a planned breeding 

program at the applicant’s nursery at Aalsmeer, The 

Netherlands. The parents are propriety breeding lines 

developed by the applicant. Selection criteria: ‘Stalauli’ was 

chosen on the basis of flower characteristics and growth 

habit. Propagation: a number of mature stock plants were 

generated from the original seedling by tissue culture 

through 10 generations to confirm uniformity and stability. 

‘Stalauli’ will be commercially propagated by tissue 

culture. Breeder: Van Staaveren BV, Aalsmeer, The 

Netherlands. 

Choice of Comparators ‘Stapula’ A , ‘Sydney’ A , and 

‘Stajugro’ were initially considered as the similar varieties 

of common knowledge based on previous published 

descriptions in Plant Varieties Journal. ‘Sydney’ A (PVJ 

Vol. 7 No. 1) was chosen because of similarities in flower 

colour and ‘Stapula’ A (PVJ Vol. 10 No. 2) was chosen 

because arose from the same breeding program. ‘Stajugro’ 

(PVJ Vol. 3 No. 4) was rejected because of the presence of 

many stripes in the outer tepals, which is distinct from the 

candidate variety. 

Comparative Trial Comparators: ‘Stapula’ A and 

‘Sydney’ A . Comparisons of most of the characteristics are 

based on Dutch trials, which were assessed under 

conditions of controlled environment in glasshouses. 

Detailed flower descriptions of the candidate variety are 

based on plants growing in soil in a multispan polyhouse in 

Bunyip, VIC. Flowers from these plants were cut in bud in 

Oct 1999 and transported to Rye VIC, and placed in a 

solution of 5% sugar and 1 ml/l chlorine bleach. The 

flowers were assessed three to four days later. 



The Netherlands 1995 Granted ‘Stalauli’ 

EU 1997 Granted ‘Stalauli’ 

Japan 1997 Applied ‘Stalauli’ 

USA 1997 Granted ‘Stalauli’ 

New Zealand 1997 Granted ‘Stalauli’ 

Colombia 1998 Applied ‘Stalauli’ 

‘Stalauli’ was first sold in The Netherlands in 1996. 

Description: David Nichols, Rye, VIC. 

Table 1 Alstroemeria Varieties 

‘Stalauli’ *‘Sydney’ A *‘Stapula’ A 

____________________________________________________ 

STEM CHARACTERISTICS 

length long medium medium to tall 

thickness medium medium thick 

density of foliage 

medium medium medium 

____________________________________________________ 

LEAF CHARACTERISTICS 

length medium medium long 

width medium medium broad 

shape of blade narrow elliptic narrow elliptic narrow ovate 

longitudinal axis of blade 

recurved recurved straight 

INFLORESCENCE CHARACTERISTICS 

number of umbel branches 


length of umbels long short long 

pedicel length medium short short 

FLOWER CHARACTERISTICS 

main colour red purple red purple red purple 

size large medium large 

spread of tepals medium medium broad 

____________________________________________________ 

OUTER TEPAL CHARACTERISTICS 

shape of blade broad obovate obovate broad obovate 

depth of emargination 

deep n/a n/a 

main colour (RHS) 

70B, 58A 70B-71B 72B-72C 

stripes absent absent absent 

number of stripes 

absent absent absent 

____________________________________________________ 

INNER LATERAL TEPAL CHARACTERISTICS 

shape of blade obovate obovate obovate 

yellow colour (RHS) 

5B-5C 3A 5C 


few to many many 

medium 

stripe thickness small to n/a medium 

medium 

____________________________________________________ 

INNER MEDIAN TEPAL CHARACTERISTICS 

yellow colour absent absent absent 

stripes present present present 

____________________________________________________ 

OTHER FLOWER CHARACTERISTICS 

filament colour red purple red purple red purple 

filament spots absent absent absent 

anther colour red brown yellow green yellow green 

style colour red purple n/a green white 

stigma colour red purple n/a red purple 

spots on stigma absent absent absent 

anthocyanin in ovary 

slight medium strong 

____________________________________________________ 

‘Starexan’ syn Xandra 






stem thickness thin, density of foliage dense. Leaf: shape 

narrow ovate, longitudinal axis of blade recurved, length 

long, width medium. Inflorescence: umbel branch number 

medium, length long, pedicel length long. Flower: colour 

red (orange red), size medium, tepal spread medium, outer 

tepal shape obovate, depth of emargination medium, stripes 

very few, colour red RHS 45A at the apex, RHS 45B at the 

centre, RHS 54A at the margins and RHS 54D at the base; 

inner lateral tepals shape obovate, colour yellow RHS 14A 

16



at the centre, red RHS 45A-B at the apex and RHS 54B at 

the base; stripes number medium, thickness medium to 

thick; inner median tepal yellow colour absent, stripes 

present. Stamens: filament red (orange red), spots absent, 

anther colour red brown (brownish). Ovary: anthocyanin 

slight (medium), style red pink, stigma red pink, spots 

absent. (Note: data in parenthesis denotes Dutch 

observations, all RHS numbers referred to in local 

observation were based on the 1986 edition). 


89T477-1 x pollen parent 86F1382-1 in a planned breeding 

program at the applicant’s nursery at Aalsmeer, The 

Netherlands. The parents are propriety breeding lines 

developed by the applicant. Selection criteria: ‘Starexan’ 

was chosen on the basis of flower characteristics and 

growth habit. Propagation: a number of mature stock plants 

were generated from the original seedling by tissue culture 


‘Starexan’ will be commercially propagated by tissue 


Netherlands. 

Choice of Comparators ‘Miami’ and ‘Stalona’ A were 

selected as the similar varieties of common knowledge 

based on previous published descriptions in Plant Varieties 

Journal. ‘Miami’ (PVJ Vol. 12 No. 2) was chosen because 

of similarities in flower colour and ‘Stalona’ A (PVJ Vol. 10 

No. 4) because arose from the same breeding program. 

Comparative Trial Comparators: ‘Miami’ and ‘Stalona’ A . 

Comparisons of most of the characteristics are based on 

Dutch trials, which were assessed under conditions of 

controlled environment in glasshouses. Detailed flower 

descriptions of the candidate variety are based on plants 

growing in soil in a multispan polyhouse in Bunyip, VIC. 

Flowers from these plants were cut in bud in Oct 1999 and 

transported to Rye VIC, and placed in a solution of 5% 

sugar and 1 ml/l chlorine bleach. The flowers were assessed 

three to four days later. 



The Netherlands 1995 Granted ‘Starexan’ 

EU 1997 Granted ‘Starexan’ 

Japan 1997 Applied ‘Starexan’ 

USA 1997 Granted ‘Starexan’ 

South Africa 1998 Applied ‘Starexan’ 

Colombia 1998 Applied ‘Starexan’ 

‘Starexan’ was first sold in The Netherlands in 1996. 



‘Starexan’ *‘Miami’ *‘Stalona’ A 

____________________________________________________ 


length long medium medium 

thickness thin thin medium 


dense medium to dense 

dense 

____________________________________________________ 


length long medium medium 

width medium broad medium 

shape of blade narrow narrow narrow elliptic 

obovate elliptic 


recurved recurved recurved 

____________________________________________________ 



medium few medium 

length of umbels long medium long 

pedicel length long long short 

____________________________________________________ 


main colour red red red 

size medium large medium 

spread of tepals medium medium to medium to 

broad broad 

____________________________________________________ 


shape of blade obovate obovate obovate 


medium very deep medium 


45B, 54A 53C-53D 46A, 47B, 51D 

stripes present present absent 


very few very few absent 

____________________________________________________ 


shape of blade obovate obovate elliptic 

yellow colour (RHS) 

14A 14A 8C 


medium medium to few 

many 

stripe thickness medium medium medium 

to thick to thick 

____________________________________________________ 


yellow colour absent absent present 


____________________________________________________ 


filament colour red orange red red purple 

filament spots absent absent n/a 

anther colour red brown brownish greyed orange 

style colour red pink orange red red purple 

stigma colour red pink orange red red purple 

spots on stigma absent absent n/a 


slight very weak weak 

to weak 

____________________________________________________ 

‘Testapink’ syn Pink Diamond 






stem thickness thick, density of foliage medium to dense. 

Leaf: shape narrow elliptic, longitudinal axis of blade 

recurved, length long, width medium. Inflorescence: umbel 

branch number medium, length medium, pedicel length 

17


short. Flower: colour white and purple pink, size large, tepal 

spread medium, outer tepal shape broad obovate, depth of 

emargination shallow, stripes very few (absent), colour 

white RHS 155C at margins and base red pink RHS 68A-B 

at the apex and red RHS 58A-B at the centre; inner lateral 

tepals shape elliptic, colour yellow RHS 4C-D at centre and 

base, red purple RHS 68A-B at the apex, stripes medium 

thickness small to medium; inner median tepal yellow 

colour absent, stripes present. Stamens: filament purple 

pink, spots present, anther colour greenish. Ovary: 

anthocyanin weak (medium), style purple pink, stigma 

purple pink, spots absent. (Note: data in parenthesis denotes 

Dutch observations, all RHS numbers referred to in local 

observation were based on the 1986 edition). 

Origin and Breeding Spontaneous mutation: Alstroemeria 

‘Stamond’ A at the applicant’s nursery at Aalsmeer, The 

Netherlands. The parent ‘Stamond’ A is a propriety variety 

developed by the applicant. Selection criteria: ‘Testapink’ 

was chosen on the basis of flower characteristics and 

growth habit. Propagation: a number of mature stock plants 

were generated from the original sport by tissue culture 


‘Testapink’ will be commercially propagated by tissue 


Netherlands. 

Choice of Comparators ‘Vienna’ A , ‘Stamond’ A , 

‘Stalbel’ A , ‘Cavalier’, and ‘Alaska’ A were initially 

considered as the similar varieties of common knowledge 

based on previous published descriptions in Plant Varieties 

Journal. ‘Vienna’ A (PVJ Vol. 9 No. 3) was chosen because 

of similarities in flower colour and ‘Stamond’ A was 

included (PVJ Vol. 9 No. 3) because it is the parental 

variety. ‘Stalbel’ A (PVJ Vol. 3 No. 4) and ‘Cavalier’ PVJ 

Vol. 7 No. 2) were rejected because of dark yellow colour in 

the inner lateral tepals and ‘Alaska’ A described in (PVJ 

Vol.7 No. 4) because of paucity of red purple tints. 

Comparative Trial Comparators: ‘Vienna’ A and 

‘Stamond’ A . Comparisons of most of the characteristics are 

based on Dutch trials, which were assessed under 

conditions of controlled environment in glasshouses. 

Detailed flower descriptions of the candidate variety are 

based on plants growing in soil in a multispan polyhouse in 

Bunyip, VIC. Flowers from these plants were cut in bud in 

Oct 1999 and transported to Rye VIC, and placed in a 

solution of 5% sugar and 1 ml/l chlorine bleach. The 

flowers were assessed three to four days later. 



EU 1997 Applied ‘Testapink’ 

USA 1997 Granted ‘Testapink’ 

South Africa 1998 Applied ‘Testapink’ 

No prior sales. 



‘Testapink’ *‘Vienna’ A *‘Stamond’ A 

____________________________________________________ 


length long medium long 

thickness thick thick medium to thick 


medium to medium to dense 

dense dense 

____________________________________________________ 


length long short long 

width medium narrow broad 

shape of blade narrow elliptic narrow elliptic narrow ovate 


recurved straight straight 

____________________________________________________ 




length of umbels 

medium medium long 

pedicel length short medium medium 

____________________________________________________ 


main colour white and white and white 

pink pink 

size large medium large 

spread of tepals medium medium broad 

____________________________________________________ 


shape of blade broad obovate broad obovate broad obovate 


shallow n/a n/a 


155C, 68A-B, 155D, 70B, 155D 

58B-C 70D 

stripes present absent present 


very few absent very few 

____________________________________________________ 


shape of blade elliptic broad elliptic elliptic 

yellow colour(RHS) 

4C-D 12A 4C 



stripe thickness small to medium medium 

medium 

____________________________________________________ 


yellow colour absent present absent 


____________________________________________________ 


filament colour purple pink purple pink white 

filament spots present absent absent 

anther colour greenish brownish greenish 

style colour purple pink purple pink white 

stigma colour purple pink purple pink white 

spots on stigma absent absent absent 


weak weak absent 

____________________________________________________ 

18



ASTER 

Aster hybrid 

‘Dark Milka’ 

Application No: 98/260 Accepted: 18 Jan 1999. 

Applicant: Nachtvlinder B.V., Ter Aar, The Netherlands. 

Agent: Yates Botanicals Pty Ltd, Somersby, NSW. 

Characteristics (Table 4, Figure 11) Plant: habit upright, 

height medium. Stem: internodes medium, pubescence 

absent-very weak, anthocyanin at internode and leaf axil 

present. Leaf: long (average length 139mm), shape elliptic, 

dentations at distal part of margin, apex acute, anthocyanin 

absent, sessile, pubescence absent. Inflorescence: 

capitulum, distributed along the axis, more than two whorls 

of ray florets. Ray florets: very many, attitude horizontal, 

length medium, shape narrow elliptic, cross sectional shape 

concave, curvature of longitudinal axis and tip straight, 

apex acute, dentation of apex absent, colour of upper side 

violet (RHS 87A-B, 1995), colour less intense towards 

base. Involucre: many bracts, length medium, shape 

funnelform, bract position free, bract overlapping medium. 

Origin and Breeding Spontaneous mutation: ‘Milka’. The 

parent is characterised by having a violet flower 

corresponding to RHS 85A (1995). Following mutation, an 

additional cycle of selection took place in Ter Aar, The 

Netherlands in 1994. Selection criteria: flower colour. 

Propagation: stock plants were created from cuttings and 

micropropagation and were found to be uniform and stable 

through many generations. ‘Dark Milka’ will be 

commercially propagated by vegetative cuttings from 

micropropagated motherstock created from the stock plants. 

Breeder: P.J.F. Akerboom, Nachtvlinder B.V, Holland. 

Choice of Comparators ‘Milka’ and ‘Karmijn Milka’ were 

used for the comparative trial as these varieties have similar 

flower forms and colours and arise from the same breeding 

program. ‘Milka’ is also the parental variety. No other 

similar varieties were identified. 

Comparative Trial Comparators: ‘Milka’, ‘Karmijn 

Milka’. Location: Somersby, NSW, autumn-spring 1999. 

Conditions: trial initially grown under glass with long days 

provided by incandescent lights until flower initiation in 

Aug 1999, then finished in open beds in full sun, plants 

propagated from cutting and micropropagation, rooted 

cuttings planted into 150mm pots filled with soilless potting 

mix (pine bark & copra peat base), nutrition maintained 

with slow release fertilisers, pest and disease treatments 

applied as required. Trial design: 40 pots of each variety 


Measurements: from ten plants at random. One sample per 

plant. 



The Netherlands 1994 Surrendered ‘Dark Milka’ 

EU 1996 Granted ‘Dark Milka’ 

Israel 1996 Granted ‘Dark Milka’ 

Japan 1996 Applied ‘Dark Milka’ 

South Africa 1998 Granted ‘Dark Milka’ 

First sold in The Netherlands in 1996. First sold in Australia 

in 1998. 

Description: Ian Paananen, Crop & Nursery Services, Central Coast, 

NSW. 

‘Karmijn Milka’ 





height short-medium. Stem: internodes medium, 

pubescence absent-very weak, anthocyanin at internode and 

leaf axil present. Leaf: long (average length 138mm), shape 

elliptic, dentations at distal part of margin, apex acute, 

anthocyanin absent, sessile, pubescence absent. 

Inflorescence: capitulum, distributed distally along axis, 

more than two whorls of ray florets. Ray florets: very many, 

attitude semi-upright, length medium, shape narrow elliptic, 

cross sectional shape concave, curvature of longitudinal 

axis and tip straight, apex acute, dentation of apex absent, 

colour of upper side purple (RHS 78B-C, 1995), even 

distribution of intensity of colour. Involucre: many bracts, 

length medium, shape campanulate, bract position free, 

bract overlapping medium. 

Origin and Breeding Spontaneous mutation: ‘Milka’. The 

parent is characterised by having a violet flower 

corresponding to RHS 85A (1995). Following mutation, an 

additional cycle of selection took place in Ter Aar, The 

Netherlands in 1994. Selection criteria: flower colour. 

Propagation: stock plants were created from cuttings and 

micropropagation and were found to be uniform and stable 

through many generations. ‘Karmijn Milka’ will be 

commercially propagated by vegetative cuttings from 

micropropagated motherstock created from the stock plants. 

Breeder: P.J.F. Akerboom, Nachtvlinder B.V, Holland. 

Choice of Comparators ‘Milka’, ‘Dark Milka’, ‘Karmijn’ 

and ‘Mauve Parade’ were used for the comparative trial as 

these varieties have similar flower forms and colours and 

arise from the same breeding program. ‘Milka’ is also the 

parental variety. No other similar varieties were identified. 

Comparative Trial Comparators: ‘Milka’, ‘Dark Milka’, 

‘Karmijn’ and ‘Mauve Parade’. Location: Somersby, NSW, 

autumn-spring 1999. Conditions: trial initially grown under 

glass with long days provided by incandescent lights until 

flower initiation in Aug 1999, then finished in open beds in 

full sun, plants propagated from cutting and 

micropropagation, rooted cuttings planted into 150mm pots 

filled with soilless potting mix (pine bark & copra peat 

base), nutrition maintained with slow release fertilisers, pest 

and disease treatments applied as required. Trial design: 40 

pots of each variety arranged in a completely randomised 

design. Measurements: from ten plants at random. One 

sample per plant. 



EU 1996 Applied ‘Karmijn Milka’ 

Israel 1996 Applied ‘Karmijn Milka’ 

South Africa 1998 Withdrawn ‘Karmijn Milka’ 


in 1998. 


NSW. 

19


‘Milka’ 

Application No: 97/312 Accepted: 25 Nov 1997. 






leaf axil present. Leaf: long (average length 139mm), shape 



Inflorescence: capitulum, distributed along the axis, more 

than two whorls of ray florets. Ray florets: very many, 

attitude semi-upright, length medium, shape narrow elliptic, 

cross sectional shape concave, curvature of longitudinal 

axis and tip straight, apex acute, dentation of apex absent, 

colour of upper side violet (RHS 83A, 1995), even 

distribution of intensity of colour. Involucre: many bracts, 

length medium, shape funnelform, bract position free, bract 

overlapping weak. 


Butterfly series (A. pringlei x A. novi-belgii) x pollen parent 

“P. series” in a planned breeding program. The parents are 

characterised by having single, blue flowers. Following the 

cross, a single cycle of selection took place in Ter Aar, The 

Netherlands in 1991. Selection criteria: many whorls of ray 

florets, flower colour. Propagation: stock plants were 

created from cuttings and micropropagation and were found 

to be uniform and stable through many generations. ‘Milka’ 

will be commercially propagated by vegetative cuttings 

from micropropagated motherstock created from the stock 

plants. Breeder: P.J.F. Akerboom, Nachtvlinder B.V, The 

Netherlands. 

Choice of Comparators ‘Karmijn’ and ‘Karmijn Milka’ 

were used for the comparative trial as these varieties have 

similar flower forms and colours and arise from the same 

breeding program. The parents were excluded on the basis 

of their single flower form. No other similar varieties were 

identified. 

Comparative Trial Comparators: ‘Karmijn’, ‘Karmijn 

Milka’. Location: Somersby, NSW, autumn-spring 1999. 

Conditions: trial initially grown under glass with long days 

provided by incandescent lights until flower initiation in 

Aug 1999, then finished in open beds in full sun, plants 

propagated from cutting and micropropagation, rooted 

cuttings planted into 150mm pots filled with soilless potting 

mix (pine bark & copra peat base), nutrition maintained 


applied as required. Trial design: 40 pots of each variety 


Measurements: from ten plants at random. One sample per 

plant. 



The Netherlands 1993 Granted ‘Milka’ 

Germany 1994 Granted ‘Milka’ 

Israel 1994 Granted ‘Milka’ 

Japan 1996 Applied ‘Milka’ 

USA 1996 Granted ‘Milka’ 

South Africa 1998 Withdrawn ‘Milka’ 


in 1998. 


NSW. 

‘Peter’s White’ 







leaf axil present. Leaf: long (average length 121mm), shape 



Inflorescence: capitulum, distributed along the axis, more 

than two whorls of ray florets. Ray florets: very many, 

attitude semi-upright to horizontal, length medium, shape 

narrow elliptic, cross sectional shape concave, curvature of 

longitudinal axis and tip straight, apex acute, dentation of 

apex present, colour of upper side white (RHS 155D, 1995), 

even distribution of intensity of colour. Involucre: many 

bracts, length medium, shape funnelform, bract position 

free, bract overlapping strong. 


Butterfly series (A. pringlei x A. novi-belgii) x pollen parent 

“P. series” in a planned breeding program. The parents are 

characterised by having single, white flowers. Following 

the cross, a single cycle of selection took place in Ter Aar, 

The Netherlands in 1994. Selection criteria: many whorls of 

ray florets, flower colour. Propagation: stock plants were 

created from cuttings and micropropagtion and were found 

to be uniform and stable through many generations. ‘Peter’s 

White’ will be commercially propagated by vegetative 

cuttings from micropropagated motherstock created from 

the stock plants. Breeder: P.J.F. Akerboom, Nachtvlinder 

B.V, Holland. 

Choice of Comparators ‘Milka’, ‘Dark Milka’, ‘Karmijn 

Milka’, ‘Karmijn’ and ‘Mauve Parade’ were used for the 

comparative trial as these varieties have similar flower 

forms and vegetative traits and arise from the same breeding 

programme. The parents were excluded on the basis of their 

single flower form. No other similar double varieties with 

white colour were identified. 

Comparative Trial Comparators: ‘Milka’, ‘Dark Milka’, 

‘Karmijn Milka’, ‘Karmijn’ and ‘Mauve Parade’. Location: 

Somersby, NSW, autumn-spring 1999. Conditions: trial 

initially grown under glass with long days provided by 

incandescent lights until flower initiation in Aug 1999, then 

finished in open beds in full sun, plants propagated from 

cutting and micropropagation, rooted cuttings planted into 

150mm pots filled with soilless potting mix (pine bark & 

copra peat base), nutrition maintained with slow release 

fertilisers, pest and disease treatments applied as required. 

Trial design: 40 pots of each variety arranged in a 

completely randomised design. Measurements: from ten 

plants at random. One sample per plant. 

20





EU 1995 Applied ‘Peter’s White’ 

Israel 1996 Granted ‘Peter’s White’ 

Japan 1996 Applied ‘Peter’s White’ 

USA 1997 Granted ‘Peter’s White’ 

South Africa 1998 Granted ‘Peter’s White’ 


in 1998. 

Description: Ian Paananen, Crop & Nursery Services, Central Coast, NSW. 

Table 4 Aster varieties 

‘Milka’ ‘Dark Milka’ ‘Peter’s White’ ‘Karmijn Milka’ *‘Karmijn’ *‘Mauve 

Parade’ 

______________________________________________________________________________________________________________ 

PLANT HEIGHT (cm) LSD (P≤0.01) = 8.7 

mean 43 a 43.8 a 40.8 a 43.2 a 38.4 a 66.9 b 

std deviation 8.1 8.4 7.4 6.4 4.1 10.1 

______________________________________________________________________________________________________________ 

LEAF DENTATIONS 

distal part distal part distal part distal part absent or weak distal part 

of margin of margin of margin of margin expression of margin; very 

distally weak proximally 

______________________________________________________________________________________________________________ 

DISTRIBUTION OF FLOWER HEADS 

spread along spread along spread along at distal spread along spread along 

axis axis axis part only axis axis 

______________________________________________________________________________________________________________ 

INFLORESCENCE DIAMETER (mm) LSD (P≤0.01) = 2.4 

mean 32.3 a 31.4 a 30.4 a 29.7 a 27.1 b 35.0 c 

std deviation 1.4 2.5 2.9 2.0 1.7 1.8 

______________________________________________________________________________________________________________ 

RAY FLORET 

attitude semi-upright semi-upright semi-upright semi-upright semi-upright semi-upright 

to horizontal to horizontal 

shape in cross section 

concave concave concave concave straight concave 

dentation of apex absent absent present absent present absent 

colour of upper 

side (RHS, 1995) 85A 87A-B 155D 78B-C 78A 80A-81A 

distribution of 

colour intensity even lighter at base even even even even 

______________________________________________________________________________________________________________ 

RAY FLORET LENGTH (mm) LSD (P≤0.01) = 1.1 

mean 11.0 b 10.9 b 11.4 ab 10.5 b 10.4 b 12.4 a 

std deviation 0.8 1.0 1.1 0.8 0.7 1.3 

______________________________________________________________________________________________________________ 

INVOLUCRE LENGTH (mm) LSD (P≤0.01) = 1.4 

mean 10.6 a 11.3 a 7.5 c 10.4 a 8.5 bc 8.9 b 

std deviation 0.8 0.9 1.6 1.6 1.0 1.1 

______________________________________________________________________________________________________________ 

INVOLUCRE 

shape funnel funnel funnel campanulate campanulate funnel 

number of bracts many many many many medium many 

overlapping of 

bracts weak medium strong medium weak medium 

______________________________________________________________________________________________________________ 

TIME OF BEGINNING OF FLOWERING 

late medium-late medium medium-late medium very late 

______________________________________________________________________________________________________________ 

Mean values followed by the same letter are not significantly different at P≤0.01 according to an S-N-K test. 

21


AVOCADO 

Persea americana 

‘Llanos Hass’ 

Application No: 97/159 Accepted: 6 August 1997. 

Applicant: Anthony Philip Llanos and Cassandra Ann 

Llanos, Hope Valley, WA. 

Characteristics (Table 5, Figure 28) Plant: habit vigorous, 

upright, height medium to large. Stem: anthocyanin not 

present in young shoots. Leaf: attitude horizontal, blade 

folding concave, length long, width narrow, size large 

(183mm x 71mm), shape lanceolate (length:width ratio 

2.6), tip acute, anthocyanin present in newly emerged 

leaves, anise aroma not present when crushed. 

Inflorescence: size axis length medium, Type ‘B’. Flower: 

habit late, pubescence on sepals medium. Mature fruit: 

early maturing, size small (97mm x 64mm), shape base 

rounded stylar region slightly depressed, length:diameter 

ratio medium (1.5:1), stalk cavity present, relief of surface 

rough. Pedicel: length medium, shape cylindrical, nailhead 

shape present, pedicel/peduncle combined length medium 

(81mm). Ripe fruit: colour of skin purple black, thickness 

of skin thick (1.75mm), texture of skin leathery, adherence 

of skin to flesh medium, main flesh colour yellow, wide 

green layer of flesh next to skin, fibres in flesh 

inconspicuous, flesh texture smooth, seed set into cavity 

tight. Seed: size compared to fruit large (flesh weight:seed 

weight ratio 3.7:1), shape in longitudinal section base 

flattened, apex conical. 

Origin and Breeding Open pollination followed by 

seedling selection: an open pollinated seedling was selected 

at applicant’s property in Hope Valley, WA, which displayed 

precocious and consistent fruit set that was similar to ‘Hass’ 

but consistently matured approximately 4-6 weeks earlier 

than ‘Hass’. DNA profiling has shown that ‘Hass’ is likely 

to be one of the parents. Selection criteria: fruit quality and 

maturity. Propagation: by vegetative grafting onto seedling 

rootstocks. Breeders: Anthony and Cassandra Llanos, Hope 

Valley, WA, Australia. 

Choice of Comparators ‘Hass’ was chosen as the sole 

comparator because it is the most similar variety of 

common knowledge. DNA profiling indicated that ‘Llanos 

Hass’ is genetically very similar to ‘Hass’. 

Comparative Trial Comparator: ‘Hass’. Location: Hope 

Valley, WA (Zone 50) approximately 30Km south of Perth. 

Conditions: scion wood from the original ‘Llanos Hass’ 

seedling tree was grafted onto Guatemalan seedling 

rootstocks, trees were planted in 1996 at spacings of 5.0m x 

2.5m to a total of 100 trees. ‘Hass’ trees grafted onto 

Guatemalan seedling rootstocks were planted randomly 

within the ‘Llanos Hass’ block in 1997 to a total of 10 trees. 

The plants were grown in the field, soil being deep sands; 

all trees were managed in the same manner with regard to 

irrigation and nutrition. Irrigation using mini sprinklers 

aimed to wet 100% of soil in the drip zone. Nutrition 

requirements were based on annual leaf analysis and 

applied by fertigation. Trial design: the trial set up was of a 

completely randomised design. Measurements: samples 

were randomly collected from trees selected at random for 

analysis. 


First Australian sale in 1998. 

Description: Alec McCarthy, Agriculture Western Australia, Bunbury, WA. 

Table 5 Persea varieties 

‘Llanos Hass’ *‘Hass’ 

____________________________________________________ 

YOUNG SHOOT: COLOUR OF LENTICELS 

red 

green 

____________________________________________________ 

LEAF BLADE: LENGTH (mm) 

mean 183 165 

std deviation 21 25 

LSD/sig 9 P≤0.01 

____________________________________________________ 

LEAF BLADE: WIDTH (mm) 

mean 71 76 



____________________________________________________ 

LEAF BLADE: LENGTH TO WIDTH RATIO 

mean 2.6 2.2 

std deviation 0.3 0.4 

LSD/sig 0.1 P≤0.01 

____________________________________________________ 

LEAF BLADE: SHAPE 

lanceolate elliptical 

____________________________________________________ 

INFLORESCENCE: LENGTH OF AXIS 

medium 

long 

____________________________________________________ 

INFLORESCENCE: FLOWERING TYPE 

Type B 

Type A 

____________________________________________________ 

PEDICEL: COLOUR 

green 

yellow green 

____________________________________________________ 

PEDICEL/PEDUNLE: COMBINED LENGTH (mm) 

mean 81 123 


LSD/sig 13.8 P≤0.01 

____________________________________________________ 

RIPE FRUIT: THICKNESS OF SKIN (mm) 

mean 1.75 1.42 


LSD/sig 0.20 P≤0.01 

____________________________________________________ 

RIPE FRUIT: TEXTURE OF SKIN 

leathery 

corky 

____________________________________________________ 

RIPE FRUIT: WIDTH OF COLOURED LAYER OF FLESH 

NEXT TO SKIN 

wide 

medium 

____________________________________________________ 

SEED: SIZE COMPARED TO FRUIT SIZE 

large 

medium 

____________________________________________________ 

FLESH: SEED TO WEIGHT RATIO 

mean 3.7 4.8 


LSD/sig 0.5 P≤0.01 

____________________________________________________ 

SEED: SHAPE IN LONGITUDINAL SECTION 

base flattened, ovate 

apex conical 

____________________________________________________ 

TIME OF FRUIT MATURITY FOR HARVESTING: 

early 

late 

____________________________________________________ 

22



BOX HONEYSUCKLE 

Lonicera nitida 

‘Paradise Royal Flush’ 


Applicant: R. J. Cherry, Kulnura, NSW. 

Characteristics (Table 6, Figure 18) Plant: vigorous, dense, 

upright, branching, evergreen shrub. Stem: round in cross 

section, new stem growth purple (ca. RHS 187A) fading 

with age. Leaf: opposite, length 17mm (average), width 

11mm (average), shape ovate-cordate, deeply concave in 

cross section, margin entire with medium undulation, apex 

blunt acuminate, base slightly cordate-truncate, colour of 

upper surface dark green (RHS 147A), lower surface dull 

green (RHS 146B), new growth purple (RHS 187A). 

Flower: trumpet shaped, borne in pairs in the leaf axils of 

new season’s growth, size small (average diameter 10mm) 

with five fused petals, five free anthers becoming fused half 

way down the corolla tube, colour creamy-lime (RHS 

154D). (Note: all RHS colour chart number refers to 1995 

edition) 

Origin and Breeding Controlled Pollination: Lonicera 

nitida ‘Aurea’ (seed parent) x Lonicera nitida Common 

form (pollen parent) in a planned breeding program in 

1993. Several seeds were developed as a result of this cross. 

Seedlings were produced and raised to maturity in 1994. 

Selection criteria: from the batch of these seedlings, 

‘Paradise Royal Flush’ was selected for its vigour, dense 

growth habit and deeply coloured new growth. Propagation: 

asexually by cuttings through three generations to ensure 

uniformity and stability. Breeder: R. J. Cherry, Paradise 

Plants, Kulnura, NSW, Australia. 

Choice of Comparator The comparator used in this trial is 

the Common form of Lonicera nitida. This variety has been 

chosen as it is the most similar variety of common 

knowledge and is also the pollen parent. The seed parent 

Lonicera nitida ‘Aurea’ was not used as it is clearly 

different from the candidate variety in leaf colour (yellowgreen 

ca. RHS 144C) which is the primary distinguishing 

characteristic. 

Comparative Trial Comparator: Common form of 

Lonicera nitida. Location: trial conducted at Paradise 

Plants, Kulnura, between 1997-1999. Conditions: plants 

raised on their own roots from cuttings. Grown in 200mm 

pots in commercial potting mix and potted up into 250mm 

pots after 1 year, grown under full sun with overhead 

watering. All plants were subjected to the same chemical 

treatments for crop protection and nutrition as required. 

Trial design: 12 plants of each variety arranged in a 

complete block design. Measurements: taken from 10 

plants of each variety. All leaf measurements are taken from 

mature leaves. 


No prior application. First sold in Australia in Oct 1997. 

Description : John Robb, Paradise Plants, Kulnura, NSW. 

Table 6 Lonicera varieties 

‘Paradise *Lonicera nitida 

Royal Flush’ Common Form 

____________________________________________________ 

PLANT CHARACTERISTICS 

growth habit erect semi prostrate 

stem: colour (new growth) 

ca. 187A 187A 

____________________________________________________ 


leaf shape ovate-cordate ovate-cordate 

leaf apex blunt acuminate blunt acuminate 

leaf base slightly cordate slightly cordate 

to truncate to truncate 

leaf margin entire entire 

leaf undulation medium weak 

leaf arrangement opposite opposite 

leaf cross section deeply concave deeply concave 

____________________________________________________ 

LEAF COLOUR (RHS, 1995) 

upper surface 147A 137A 

lower surface 146B 147C 

new growth 187A 145A 

____________________________________________________ 

LEAF LENGTH (mm) 

mean 16.94 11.09 


LSD/sig 1.34 P≤0.01 

____________________________________________________ 

LEAF WIDTH (mm) 

mean 10.53 8.09 


LSD/sig 1.09 P≤0.01 

____________________________________________________ 

LENGTH OF 3rd INTERNODE FROM GROWING 

POINT (mm) 

mean 15.44 10.90 


LSD/sig 2.28 P≤0.01 

____________________________________________________ 

LENGTH OF 4th INTERNODE FROM GROWING 

POINT (mm) 

mean 18.91 14.38 


LSD/sig 3.15 P≤0.01 

____________________________________________________ 

LENGTH OF 5th INTERNODE FROM GROWING 

POINT (mm) 

mean 21.23 15.32 


LSD/sig 3.62 P≤0.01 

____________________________________________________ 

BRUNFELSIA 

Brunfelsia latifolia 

‘Sweet & Petite’ 


Applicant: Andrew Watkinson, Palmwoods, QLD. 

Agent: Florabundance, Verrierdale, QLD. 

Characteristics (Table 7, Figure 19) Plant: erect, compact, 

dense, multi branching, shrub to 1m in height, width 

medium. Stem: internode short. Leaf: length medium 

(average 58.28mm), width medium (average 26.66mm), 

23


shape elliptical. Mature leaf colour 144C (RHS, 1986). 

Superior cold hardiness observed, with minimal leaf 

discolouration and leaf drop. 

Origin and Breeding Spontaneous mutation: from 

Common form of Brunfelsia latifolia at applicant’s property 

at Palmwoods, QLD. A mutated compact lateral side shoot 

was removed from the mother plant and vegetatively 

reproduced through over 8 generations to establish 

uniformity and stability of the selection. The new variety is 

characterised by very compact growth habit, which is 

different from the normal form of the species. Selection 

criteria: compact, dense branching habit. Propagation: 

vegetatively through cuttings. Breeder Andrew Watkinson, 

Palmwoods, QLD. 

Choice of Comparators ‘Warwick’ was included, as it is 

the most similar variety of common knowledge in 

commercial production. ‘Compacta’ was included, as it is a 

widely known smaller growing cultivar of B. latifolia. The 

Common form of B. latifolia was included, as it is the 

parental species. 

Comparative Trial Comparator: ‘Warwick’ ‘Compacta’ 

and Common form of B. latifolia. Location: Florabundance 

Wholesale Nursery, Verrierdale, QLD. Oct 1998-Nov 1999. 

Conditions: plants from cuttings were grown in 200mm 

pots in full sun conditions in composted pinebark and sand 

media, with Osmocote ® as the primary fertiliser. Standard 

pest and disease management applied as required. Trial 

design: 30 plants of each variety arranged in randomised 

rows. Measurements: taken from all trial plants. 


No prior applications. First sold in Australia 24 th Sep 1997. 

Description: Tony Kebblewhite, Verrierdale, QLD. 

Table 7 Brunfelsia varieties 

‘Sweet & *‘Warwick’ *‘Compacta’ *B. 

Petite’ 

latifolia 

Common 

Form 

____________________________________________________ 

PLANT HABIT 

upright upright semi semi 

broad narrow upright upright 

spreading spreading spreading spreading 

____________________________________________________ 

LEAF MARGIN UNDULATION 

weak weak strong weak 

____________________________________________________ 

LEAF COLOUR (RHS) 

yellow green green yellow 

green 

green 

144C 146A 144C 146A 

____________________________________________________ 

LEAF LENGTH (mm) – 6th leaf from tip 

mean 58.26 61.54 61.40 57.42 

std deviation 4.47 4.70 10.18 7.32 

LSD/sig 4.77 ns ns ns 

____________________________________________________ 

LEAF WIDTH (mm) – 6th leaf from tip 

mean 26.66 28.96 22.36 26.02 

std deviation 2.16 2.48 3.80 2.81 

LSD/sig 1.94 P≤0.01 P≤0.01 ns 

____________________________________________________ 

PETIOLE LENGTH (mm) – 6th leaf from tip 

mean 3.66 4.10 4.78 4.49 

std deviation 0.59 0.60 0.94 0.83 

LSD/sig 0.51 ns P≤0.01 P≤0.01 

____________________________________________________ 

PETIOLE THICKNESS (mm) – 6th leaf from tip 

mean 0.69 0.73 0.67 0.88 

std deviation 0.006 0.005 0.018 0.012 

LSD/sig 0.07 ns ns P≤0.01 

____________________________________________________ 

INTERNODE LENGTH (mm) – between 3rd and 4th internode 

mean 5.30 7.19 13.81 12.96 

std deviation 0.97 1.27 3.50 3.14 

LSD/sig 1.68 P≤0.01 P≤0.01 P≤0.01 

____________________________________________________ 

NUMBER OF BASAL SHOOTS 

mean 6.96 4.90 5.33 6.20 

std deviation 1.42 1.18 1.53 2.61 

LSD/sig 1.20 P≤0.01 P≤0.01 ns 

____________________________________________________ 

CANOLA 

Brassica napus var oleifera 

‘Charlton’ 


Applicant: Agriculture Victoria Services Pty Ltd, 

Attwood, VIC and Grains Research and Development 

Corporation, Barton, ACT. 

Characteristics (Table 8, Figure 36) Plant: habit erect, 

height medium (90.5cm), medium maturing. Seedling: 

cotyledons relatively narrow (width/length ratio 1.63), first 

true leaf few or no hairs, 5th leaf mostly lobed, colour green 

(RHS 137C/D, 1986). Flower: wide petals (length/width 

ratio 2.2), anther dotting variable. Pods: long (58.2mm), 

long beak (9.7mm), long pedicel (22.2mm). Seed: canola 

quality, high oil content. Disease resistance: resistant to 

blackleg disease. Maturity: medium. 

Origin and Breeding Single plant selection: ‘Charlton’ 

was developed as a single plant selection in 1992 from a 

breeding line, RF3 (this line was later released as 

‘Dunkeld’ A in 1994). The selection work was carried out in 

a blackleg nursery at Lake Bolac, VIC. Between 1993 and 

1994, the line was evaluated for oil and protein content, 

canola quality, yield potential, and disease resistance. In 

1994, the line was identified as a promising advanced line 

and was entered into the Interstate Stage 2 Canola Trials as 

RI25. It was trialed in a number of locations covering all 

canola-growing regions of Australia for three years, prior to 

commercialisation and seed increase in 1997. ‘Charlton’ is 

distinguishable from ‘Dunkeld’ by its cotyledon 

width/length ratio, longer pods, longer beak and 

significantly higher oil content in the seed. Selection 

criteria: oil content, yield, Blackleg resistance, maturity. 

Propagation: open pollinated seed. Breeder: Dr. P. A. 

Salisbury, Victorian Institute for Dryland Agriculture, 

Horsham, VIC. 

Choice of Comparators ‘Dunkeld’ A and ‘Grouse’ A were 

used as comparators. ‘Dunkeld’ A is the most similar variety 

of common knowledge because ‘Charlton’ originated as a 

selection from this variety. ‘Grouse’ A was included because 

it is a prominent medium maturity variety of common 

knowledge similar to the candidate. 

24



Comparative Trial Comparators: ‘Dunkeld’ A and 

‘Grouse’ A . Location: trials conducted at Ag-Seed Research 

trial site in Horsham, VIC. Field trials were conducted 

during 1997 and 1998 seasons. Glasshouse trials were 

carried out in 1999. Conditions: drought conditions were 

experienced in both 1997 and 1998 seasons in western 

Victoria. Trial design: data on mature plant characteristics 

were collected in replicated field trials consisting six row 

10m plots laid out as randomised blocks. Seedling data 

were collected in glasshouse trials designed as completely 

randomised trials. Measurements: data were recorded on 20 

random plants from each of the three replicates giving a 

total of 60 observations per variety. 


First sold in Australia in 1998. 

Description: Dr. Gururaj Kadkol, Ag-Seed Research Pty Ltd, Horsham, 

VIC. 

Table 8 Brassica varieties 

‘Charlton’ *‘Dunkeld’ A *‘Grouse’ A 

____________________________________________________ 

COTYLEDON WIDTH/LENGTH 

mean 1.63 1.74 1.73 

std deviation 0.13 0.17 0.09 

LSD/sig 0.06 P≤0.01 P≤0.01 

____________________________________________________ 

EXTENT OF HAIRS ON FIRST TRUE LEAF (COUNTS 

FROM 60 LEAVES) 

absent 24 42 47 

few 36 18 8 

numerous 0 0 5 

____________________________________________________ 

PERCENTAGE OF LEAF LOBING 

present 73 83 28.3 

____________________________________________________ 

NUMBER OF LEAF LOBES 

2.2 2.5 0.8 

____________________________________________________ 

DAYS TO 50% FLOWERING 

117 117 113 

____________________________________________________ 

PETAL LENGTH/WIDTH 

mean 2.20 2.13 2.11 


LSD/sig 0.09 ns P≤0.01 

____________________________________________________ 

PERCENTAGE OF ANTHER DOTTING 

present 46.7 41.7 38.3 

____________________________________________________ 

PLANT HEIGHT (cm) 

mean 90.5 84.2 81.5 


LSD/sig 3.9 P≤0.01 P≤0.01 

____________________________________________________ 

SILIQUA LENGTH (mm) 

mean 58.2 53.2 51.6 


LSD/sig 3.8 P≤0.01 P≤0.01 

____________________________________________________ 

BEAK LENGTH (mm) 

mean 9.65 11.3 8.1 


LSD/sig 1.2 P≤0.01 P≤0.01 

____________________________________________________ 

‘Hylite 200 TT’ 


Applicant: Pacific Seeds Pty Ltd, Toowoomba, QLD. 

Characteristics (Table 9, Figure 37) Plant: height short 

(average 104cm); flowering and maturity very early. 

Leaves: short and narrow, strongly lobed, strongly dentate, 

medium green. Inflorescence: petals yellow, apetalous; 

petals missing on 90% of flowers. Siliqua: peduncles short, 

pods 54mm long and beaks short. Seed: free of erucic acid. 

Plants tolerate triazine herbicides. 


‘Siren’ x pollen parent breeding line PAC N 145. The 

female parent is triazine tolerant and the early flowering 

pollen parent was backcrossed three times onto the female. 

‘Hylite 200 TT’ is much earlier flowering and has shorter 

and narrower leaves than the female parent ‘Siren’. It has 

triazine tolerance when the male parent is non-triazine 

tolerant. The female parent contributes to reduced vigour in 

‘Hylite 200 TT’ compared with its recurrent male parent. 

After hybridisation and three backcrosses, three generations 

of self pollination stabilised the expression of a distinctive 

apetalous character. Selection criteria: triazine tolerance, 

very early maturity, apetalous trait and oil content. 

Propagation: by seed. Breeder: Andrew Easton, Pacific 

Seeds Pty Ltd, Toowoomba, QLD. 

Choice of Comparators Varieties not tolerant to triazine 

herbicides can be readily distinguished. Other triazine 

resistant varieties are much later flowering. Comparators 

included the female parent ‘Siren’ and two early flowering 

varieties, ‘Mystic’ A and ‘Karoo’ A . 

Comparative Trial Comparators: ‘Siren’, and ‘Mystic’ A 

and ‘Karoo’ A . Location: trial conducted at Cowra, NSW 

(sown 19 May 1999). Conditions: sown by seed and normal 

agronomic practices were employed. Trial design: 

randomised complete blocks with two replicates. 

Measurements: 30 random samples per replication. 

Prior Applications and Sales Nil. 

Description: Dr Ross Downes, Innovative Plant Breeders, Canberra. 


‘Hylite *‘Mystic’ A *‘Siren’ *‘Karoo’ A 

200 TT’ 

____________________________________________________ 

LEAF LENGTH (cm) 

mean 16.6 27.3 24.3 27.6 

std deviation 2.29 3.56 2.38 4.30 

LSD/sig 1.39 P≤0.01 P≤0.01 P≤0.01 

____________________________________________________ 

LEAF WIDTH (cm) 

mean 7.8 12.0 10.4 10.0 

std deviation 0.87 1.47 1.34 1.47 

LSD/sig 0.56 P≤0.01 P≤0.01 P≤0.01 

____________________________________________________ 

LEAF COLOUR 

mid green mid green mid green mid green 

____________________________________________________ 

25


PLANTS WITH LEAF LOBES (PER CENT) 

93.3 70.0 85.0 95.0 

____________________________________________________ 

LOBE NUMBER PER PLANT WITH LOBED LEAVES 

4.4 4.1 5.3 3.4 

____________________________________________________ 

PETIOLE LENGTH ON PLANTS WITH LOBED LEAVES (cm) 

6.9 13.6 10.7 15.4 

____________________________________________________ 

LEAF DENTATION (rating 3=slight, 7=strong) 

6.5 5.6 5.1 5.8 

____________________________________________________ 

TIME OF FLOWERING (days after sowing at Cowra) 

94 100 112 102 

____________________________________________________ 

PETAL COLOUR 

yellow yellow yellow yellow 

____________________________________________________ 

PETALS PRESENT 

rarely yes yes yes 

____________________________________________________ 


mean 104 n/a 155 n/a 

std deviation 6.2 n/a 10.1 n/a 

LSD/sig 3.6 n/a P≤0.01 n/a 

____________________________________________________ 

SILIQUA LENGTH(mm) 

mean 54.3 54.7 50.6 49.2 

std deviation 5.8 5.8 7.6 5.9 

LSD/sig 2.7 ns P≤0.01 P≤0.01 

____________________________________________________ 

SILIQUA: LENGTH OF BEAK (mm) 



LSD/sig 0.9 P≤0.01 P≤0.01 P≤0.01 

____________________________________________________ 

SILIQUA: LENGTH OF PEDUNCLE (mm) 

mean 17.8 20.7 22.7 18.8 


LSD/sig 1.4 P≤0.01 P≤0.01 ns 

____________________________________________________ 

‘Purler’ 

Application No: 99//160 Accepted: 12 Jul 1999. 



Grains Research and Development Corporation, Barton, 

ACT. 

Agent: Wesfarmers Dalgety SeedTech, Bassendean, WA. 

Characteristics (Table 10, Figure 38) Plant: height 

medium (average 133cm), flowering and maturity medium 

late. Leaves: strongly lobed, strongly dentate, moderately 

long and broad, medium green. Inflorescence: petals 

yellow, long and moderately broad. Siliqua: peduncles 

medium length, pods medium length and beaks medium 

length. Seed: free of erucic acid. 

Origin and Breeding Recurrent Phenotypic Selection: in 

the first cycle of selection, seed from 18 single plant 

selections (from breeder lines) with high oil and protein 

content was bulked, sown in plots in a blackleg disease 

nursery, allowed to open pollinate and then harvested as a 

bulk in 1993. In 1994, the bulk seed was sown in plots again 

in the blackleg nursery. At maturity, single plant selections 

were taken and analysed for oil and protein. Selections with 

elevated levels of oil and protein were sown in preliminary 

yield trials in 1995 re-selected. Selection criteria: high oil 

and protein content in seed, tolerance to blackleg disease, 

medium maturity and high yield. Propagation: by seed. 

Breeder: Dr. Neil Wratten, Agricultural Research Institute, 

NSW Agriculture, Wagga Wagga, NSW. 

Choice of Comparators ‘Purler was compared with 

‘Ripper’, ‘47C02’, ‘46C01’, ‘Surpass 600’, ‘Charlton’, 

‘Mystic’ A , ‘Rainbow’ A and ‘Dunkeld’ A on the basis of 

following characteristics: leaf length and width, leaf colour, 

presence and number of lobes, leaf dentation, time of 

flowering, petal colour, length and width, plant height and 

pod characters. These are the most similar varieties of 

common knowledge. 

Comparative Trial Comparators: ‘Ripper’, ‘47C02’, 

‘46C01’, ‘Surpass 600’, ‘Charlton’, ‘Mystic’ A , 

‘Rainbow’ A and ‘Dunkeld’ A . Location: trials were 

conducted at Wagga Wagga, NSW (sown 10 May 1999) 

Conditions: sown by seed and normal agronomic practices 

were employed. Trial design: randomised complete blocks 

with three replicates. Measurements: two replications were 

sampled to provide 30 random samples per replication. 


Description: Dr Ross Downes, Innovative Plant Breeders, Canberra, 

ACT. 

‘Ripper’ 

Application No: 99/161 Accepted: 12 Jul 1999. 


of the State of New South Wales, Orange, NSW 

and Grains Research and Development Corporation, 

Barton, ACT. 

Agent: SGB Australia, Collins Street West, VIC. 

Characteristics (Table 10, Figure 38) Plant: height 

medium (average 132cm); flowering and maturity medium 

late. Leaves: strongly lobed, strongly dentate, moderately 

long and broad, light green. Inflorescence: petals yellow, 

long and moderately broad. Siliqua: peduncles moderate 

length, pods medium length and beaks long. Seed: free of 

erucic acid. 

Origin and Breeding Recurrent Phenotypic Selection: in 

the first cycle of selection, seed from 18 single plant 

selections (from breeder lines) with high oil and protein 

content was bulked, sown in plots in a blackleg disease 

nursery, allowed to open pollinate and then harvested as a 

bulk in 1993. In 1994, the bulk seed was sown in plots again 

in the blackleg nursery. At maturity, single plant selections 

were taken and analysed for oil and protein. Selections with 

elevated levels of oil and protein were sown in preliminary 

yield trials in 1995 and re-selected. Selection criteria: high 

oil and protein content in seed, tolerance to blackleg 

disease, medium maturity and high yield. Propagation: by 

seed. Breeder: Dr. Neil Wratten, Agricultural Research 

Institute, NSW Agriculture, Wagga Wagga, NSW. 

Choice of Comparators ‘Ripper’ was compared with 

‘Purler’, ‘47C02’, ‘46C01’, ‘Surpass 600’, ‘Charlton’, 

‘Mystic’ A , ‘Rainbow’ A and ‘Dunkeld’ A on the basis of 

26



following characteristics: leaf length and width, leaf colour, 

presence and number of lobes, leaf dentation, time of 

flowering, petal colour, length and width, plant height and 

pod characters. These are the most similar varieties of 

common knowledge. 

Comparative Trial Comparators: ‘Purler’, ‘47C02’, 

‘46C01’, ‘Surpass 600’, ‘Charlton’, ‘Mystic’ A , 

‘Rainbow’ A and ‘Dunkeld’ A . Location: trials were 

conducted at Wagga Wagga, NSW (sown 10 May 1999) 

Conditions: sown by seed and normal agronomic practices 

were employed. Trial design: randomised complete blocks 

with three replicates. Measurements: two replications were 

sampled to provide 30 random samples per replication. 


Description: Dr Ross Downes, Innovative Plant Breeders, Canberra, ACT. 


‘Ripper’ ‘Purler’ *‘47C02’ *‘46C01’ *‘Surpass *‘Charlton’ *‘Mystic’ A ‘Rainbow’ A ‘Dunkeld’ A 

600’ 

______________________________________________________________________________________________________________ 

LEAF LENGTH (cm) LSD (P≤0.01) = 1.29 

mean 21.4 bc 21.2 bc 20.2 c 20.1 c 21.4 bc 24.0 a 24.0 a 22.1 b 22.4 b 

std deviation 2.91 2.86 3.21 3.28 2.49 3.55 3.03 3.69 3.02 

______________________________________________________________________________________________________________ 

LEAF WIDTH (cm) LSD (P≤0.01) = 0.58 

mean 10.1 ab 9.9 ab 9.1 cd 9.0 cd 9.9 b 9.9 ab 10.5 a 9.7 bc 9.9 ab 

std deviation 1.27 1.31 1.22 1.53 1.38 1.29 1.36 1.51 1.32 

______________________________________________________________________________________________________________ 

LEAF COLOUR 

light green mid green dark green mid green mid green light green mid green mid green light green 

______________________________________________________________________________________________________________ 


98 100 93 53 100 97 53 93 98 

______________________________________________________________________________________________________________ 


4.1 4.8 5.0 4.3 3.9 5.6 3.7 5.3 5.3 

______________________________________________________________________________________________________________ 


10.9 10.2 10.5 10.3 10.7 12.1 12.0 12.8 11.1 

______________________________________________________________________________________________________________ 


6.0 5.8 5.3 3.4 5.1 5.7 5.9 5.8 5.6 

______________________________________________________________________________________________________________ 

TIME OF FLOWERING (days after sowing at Wagga) 

117 119 122 118 113 115 112 114 116 

______________________________________________________________________________________________________________ 

PETAL COLOUR 

yellow yellow yellow yellow yellow yellow yellow yellow yellow 

______________________________________________________________________________________________________________ 

PETAL LENGTH (mm) LSD (P≤0.01) = 0.46 

mean 14.6 a 14.1 abc 14.1 abc 12.9 d 13.9 bc 13.9 bc 14.0 abc 14.3 ab 13.6 c 

std deviation 1.06 1.04 1.32 1.13 0.89 0.96 1.07 0.92 0.87 

______________________________________________________________________________________________________________ 

PETAL WIDTH (mm) LSD (P≤0.01) = 0.40 

mean 7.4 bc 7.0 cd 7.3 bc 6.2 e 6.7 d 7.3 bc 7.6 b 8.2 a 7.1 cd 

std deviation 0.82 0.99 1.17 0.98 0.73 0.85 0.76 0.88 0.82 

______________________________________________________________________________________________________________ 

PLANT HEIGHT (cm) LSD (P≤0.01) = 3.6 

mean 132.3 b 133.4 b 132.7 b 131.7 b 125.6 a 135.4 b 133.4 b 135.7 b 133.6 b 

std deviation 6.7 8.9 10.2 10.1 8.3 7.9 8.3 8.4 9.4 

______________________________________________________________________________________________________________ 

SILIQUA LENGTH (mm) LSD (P≤0.01) = 3.2 

mean 59.7 cd 58.3 bc 52.8 a 52.2 a 62.5 d 62.5 d 58.8 bcd 55.1 ab 61.8 cd 

std deviation 7.4 6.1 7.4 8.3 6.7 8.3 6.4 6.8 9.2 

______________________________________________________________________________________________________________ 

BEAK LENGTH (mm) LSD (P≤0.01) = 0.96 

mean 16.2 f 12.7 d 10.1 b 8.6 a 11.7 cd 14.8 e 12.2 cd 10.9 bc 14.1 e 

std deviation 2.1 2.2 1.9 2.4 2.1 2.4 2.0 2.1 2.0 

______________________________________________________________________________________________________________ 

PEDUNCLE LENGTH (mm) LSD (P≤0.01) = 1.39 

mean 23.3 cd 22.9 c 19.4 ab 20.9 b 24.0 cde 25.4 e 20.1 b 18.1 a 24.5 de 

std deviation 3.2 2.9 2.8 3.2 3.3 4.1 3.5 2.5 3.6 

______________________________________________________________________________________________________________ 

Note: Mean values followed by the same letter are not significantly different at P≤0.01 according to Duncan’s Multiple Range Test. 

27


‘Surpass 600’ 



Characteristics (Table 11, Figure 39) Plant: bushy, height 

short-medium (average 125cm); flowering and maturity 

medium. Leaves: strongly lobed, moderately dentate, 

moderately short and broad, medium green. Inflorescence: 

petals yellow, medium petal length but petals narrow. 

Siliqua: peduncles long, siliqua long and beaks short. Seed: 

free of erucic acid. 


‘Dunkeld’ A x pollen parent breeding line 4101 in 1994. The 

seed parent is characterised by taller plant height than the 

candidate variety (133.6cm vs 125.6cm). The pollen parent 

is a non-commercial proprietary breeding line developed by 

the applicant. Selection criteria: in early generations 

selections were based on maturity and plant type. The F 4 

generation was selected for blackleg resistance, oil content, 

maturity. The F 5 was screened for oil content, blackleg 

resistance, maturity and plant type. Fifty nine individual 

selections were made in the following year and these were 

increased for trials and seed increase. Propagation: by seed. 

Breeder: Andrew Easton, Pacific Seeds Pty Ltd, 

Toowoomba, QLD. 

Choice of Comparators The seed parent ‘Dunkeld’ A was 

selected as a comparator as were ‘Charlton’, ‘Mystic’ A , and 

‘Rainbow’ A which exhibit moderate to strong leaf lobe 

development whereas ‘Oscar’ A , ‘Scoop’ A , ‘Range’ A and 

‘Grouse’ A were excluded because of their having few leaf 

lobes. 

Comparative Trial Comparators: ‘Charlton’, ‘Mystic’ A , 

and ‘Rainbow’ A and ‘Dunkeld’ A . Locations: trials were 

conducted at Wagga Wagga (sown 10 May 1999) and 

Cowra, NSW (sown 19 May 1999). Conditions: sown by 

seed and normal agronomic practices were employed. Trial 

design: randomised complete blocks with three replicates at 

Wagga Wagga and two at Cowra. Measurements: Two 

replications were sampled to provide 30 random samples 

per replication at each site. 




‘Surpass 600’ *‘Charlton’ *‘Mystic’ A *‘Rainbow’ A *‘Dunkeld’ A 

______________________________________________________________________________________________________________ 


mean 21.4 24.0 24.0 22.1 22.4 

std deviation 2.49 3.55 3.03 3.69 3.02 

LSD/sig 1.30 P≤0.01 P≤0.01 ns ns 

______________________________________________________________________________________________________________ 


mean 9.9 9.9 10.5 9.7 9.9 

std deviation 1.38 1.29 1.36 1.51 1.32 

LSD/sig 0.59 ns P≤0.01 ns ns 

______________________________________________________________________________________________________________ 

LEAF COLOUR 

mid green light green mid green mid green light green 

______________________________________________________________________________________________________________ 


100 97 53 93 98 

______________________________________________________________________________________________________________ 


3.9 5.6 3.7 5.3 5.3 

______________________________________________________________________________________________________________ 


10.7 12.1 12.0 12.8 11.1 

______________________________________________________________________________________________________________ 


5.1 5.7 5.9 5.8 5.6 

______________________________________________________________________________________________________________ 


113 115 112 114 116 

______________________________________________________________________________________________________________ 

PETAL WIDTH (mm) 

mean 6.7 7.3 7.6 8.2 7.1 

std deviation 0.73 0.85 0.76 0.88 0.82 

LSD/sig 0.35 P≤0.01 P≤0.01 P≤0.01 P≤0.01 

______________________________________________________________________________________________________________ 


mean 125.6 135.4 133.4 135.7 133.6 

std deviation 8.3 7.9 8.3 8.4 9.4 

LSD/sig 3.4 P≤0.01 P≤0.01 P≤0.01 P≤0.01 

______________________________________________________________________________________________________________ 


mean 62.5 62.5 58.8 55.1 61.8 

std deviation 6.7 8.3 6.4 6.8 9.2 

LSD/sig 3.3 ns P≤0.01 P≤0.01 ns 

______________________________________________________________________________________________________________ 

28



Table 11 Continued 


mean 11.7 14.8 12.2 10.9 14.1 

std deviation 2.1 2.4 2.0 2.1 2.6 

LSD/sig 1.0 P≤0.01 ns ns P≤0.01 

______________________________________________________________________________________________________________ 

PEDUNCLE LENGTH (mm) 

mean 24.0 25.4 20.1 18.1 24.5 

std deviation 3.3 4.1 3.5 2.5 3.6 

LSD/sig 1.5 ns P≤0.01 P≤0.01 ns 

______________________________________________________________________________________________________________ 

‘Surpass 600 TT’ 



Characteristics (Table 12, Figure 40) Plant: bushy, height 

medium (average 118cm); flowering and maturity medium 

late. Leaves: long and broad, strongly lobed, moderately 

dentate, light green. Inflorescence: petals yellow, long and 

medium width. Siliqua: peduncles long, pods long and 

beaks long. Seed: free of erucic acid. Plants tolerate triazine 

herbicides. 


‘Siren’ x pollen parent breeding line PAC N 142 (‘Surpass 

600’). The female parent is triazine tolerant and the male 

parent was backcrossed three times onto the female 

followed by three generations of selection and seed 

increase. ‘Surpass 600 TT’, like other triazine tolerant 

varieties has reduced vegetative growth vigour compared 

with its male parent and other non-triazine tolerant 

varieties. It has shorter and narrower leaves than ‘Siren’, is 

earlier flowering at Cowra (108 vs 112 days), and is shorter 

(145 vs 155cm), has a much longer siliqua (60 vs 50 mm), 

and has a longer beak (13.4 vs 11.5mm). Selection criteria: 

triazine tolerance, blackleg resistance, oil content. 

Propagation: by seed. Breeder: Andrew Easton, Pacific 

Seeds Pty Ltd, Toowoomba, QLD. 

Choice of Comparators Varieties not tolerant to triazine 

herbicides can be readily distinguished. The comparators 

were triazine tolerant ‘TI 1 Pinnacle’ A , ‘Drum’ A , 

‘Clancy’ A and ‘Karoo’ A . In a supplementary trial ‘Surpass 

600 TT’ was compared with its maternal parent ‘Siren’. 

Comparative Trial Comparators: ‘TI 1 Pinnacle’ A , 

‘Drum’ A , ‘Clancy’ A and ‘Karoo’ A . Locations: trials were 

conducted at Wagga Wagga (sown 10 May 1999) and 

Cowra, NSW (sown 19 May 1999). Conditions: sown by 

seed and normal agronomic practices were employed. Trial 

design: randomised complete blocks with three replicates at 

Wagga Wagga and two at Cowra. Measurements: Two 

replications were sampled to provide 30 random samples 

per replication at each site. 



Table 12 Brassica varieties 

‘Surpass 600 TT’ *‘TI 1 Pinnacle’ A *‘Drum’ A *‘Clancy’ A *‘Karoo’ A 

______________________________________________________________________________________________________________ 


mean 18.7 16.6 18.0 15.9 19.4 

std deviation 2.13 2.31 2.45 2.21 2.23 

LSD/sig 0.95 P≤0.01 ns P≤0.01 ns 

______________________________________________________________________________________________________________ 


mean 8.5 7.6 8.4 8.0 8.5 

std deviation 1.05 1.11 1.06 0.88 1.07 

LSD/sig 0.45 P≤0.01 ns P≤0.01 ns 

______________________________________________________________________________________________________________ 

LEAF COLOUR 

light green mid green light green mid green mid green 

______________________________________________________________________________________________________________ 


96.7 98.3 76.7 36.7 86.7 

______________________________________________________________________________________________________________ 


3.9 5.1 4.5 4.8 3.2 

______________________________________________________________________________________________________________ 


9.1 8.3 7.9 6.7 10.2 

______________________________________________________________________________________________________________ 


5.4 5.8 6.0 5.7 6.1 

______________________________________________________________________________________________________________ 


118 120 116 116 113 

______________________________________________________________________________________________________________ 

29


Table 12 Continued 

PETAL LENGTH ( mm) 

mean 14.4 13.3 13.7 14.1 13.0 

std deviation 1.24 1.02 1.31 0.95 1.08 

LSD/sig 0.49 P≤0.01 P≤0.01 ns P≤0.01 

______________________________________________________________________________________________________________ 


mean 6.6 6.2 7.1 7.3 6.6 

std deviation 0.91 1.01 1.01 0.76 0.77 

LSD/sig 0.39 P≤0.01 P≤0.01 P≤0.01 ns 

______________________________________________________________________________________________________________ 


mean 118.2 117.8 127.5 111.0 120.8 

std deviation 7.9 9.5 10.4 10.3 8.4 

LSD/sig 3.9 ns P≤0.01 P≤0.01 ns 

______________________________________________________________________________________________________________ 


mean 60.3 55.8 51.8 50.7 50.9 

std deviation 6.8 7.3 6.3 6.7 6.2 

LSD/sig 2.8 P≤0.01 P≤0.01 P≤0.01 P≤0.01 

______________________________________________________________________________________________________________ 


mean 10.9 9.6 8.4 8.4 10.3 

std deviation 1.9 1.8 1.9 1.9 2.0 

LSD/sig 0.8 P≤0.01 P≤0.01 P≤0.01 ns 

______________________________________________________________________________________________________________ 


mean 25.4 17.2 17.8 20.8 17.6 

std deviation 2.9 2.7 2.6 3.9 3.2 

LSD/sig 1.3 P≤0.01 P≤0.01 P≤0.01 P≤0.01 

______________________________________________________________________________________________________________ 

COCKSFOOT 

Dactylis glomerata 

‘Grasslands Excel’ 


Applicant: New Zealand Pastoral Agriculture Research 

Institute Limited, Hamilton, New Zealand. 

Agent: Mr. Peter Neilson, AgResearch Grasslands, 

Bowna via Albury, NSW. 

Characteristics (Table 13, Figure 59) Plant: intermediate to 

semi prostrate, densely tillered, very late maturing, 

moderately dark green, herbaceous perennial forage grass. 

Stem: thin, mean number per plant 79, mean thickness 

2.9mm, culm mean length (inc. inflorescence) 1106mm. 

Internode mean length 337mm. Leaf: flag mean length 

288mm, width 9mm, tiller mean length 145mm, width 

10.5mm. Inflorescence: mean length 254mm, mean number 

of panicle branches 9.4. Mean heading 22 Nov (sown 27 

Mar), panicle anthocyanin weak, anthers mostly dark 

purple. Seed: light, thousand seed weight ~ 0.3gm. Low 

susceptibility to leaf rusts. 

Origin and Breeding Open Pollination and Recurrent 

Phenotypic Selection: from an accession (K2460) received 

from Instituto Nacional de Investigaciones Agraries (INIA), 

La Coruna, Spain in 1986. K2460 was highly variable and 

characterised by low head numbers in many plants. In 1990, 

K2460 was sown in seed boxes and then transplanted into 

the field at Palmerston North and compared with 49 other 

genetic lines of prostrate habit associated with ‘Grasslands 

Wana’. In 1992, eighteen plants of K2460 were selected and 

inter-pollinated in isolation. In 1993, bulked seed was used 

establish up to 200 seedlings. In 1994, fifty-five Syn 1 

plants were selected and inter-pollinated in isolation. The 

resultant Syn 2 seed was blended to form the basis of GK52, 

which was later named ‘Grasslands Excel’. Selection 

criteria: later flowering pattern, growth habit and 

uniformity. Propagation: seed. Breeder: Dr W. Rumball, 

AgResearch Grasslands Research Centre, Palmerston 

North, New Zealand. 

Choice of Comparators ‘Grasslands Kara’ A , ‘Grasslands 

Wana’ and ‘Grasslands Tekapo’ were chosen as 

comparators to show the relativity of the late maturity of 

‘Grasslands Excel’ to these varieties of common 

knowledge. ‘Grasslands Vision’ A was included as a new 

candidate variety together with ‘Grasslands Excel’. ‘Porto’ 

and ‘Currie’ are varieties of common knowledge in 

Australia, and ‘Saborto’ is eligible for seed certification in 

New Zealand. K2460 is no longer available for comparative 

purposes. However, ‘Grasslands Excel’ differs from that 

material by having a later maturity, greater uniformity, even 

heads numbers and improved seed production potential. 

Comparative Trial Comparators: ‘Grasslands Vision’ A 

‘Grasslands Kara’ A , ‘Grasslands Wana’, ‘Grasslands 

Tekapo’, (GK53), ‘Saborto’, ‘Porto’, ‘Currie’. Location: 

AgResearch Grasslands Research Centre, Palmerston 

North, New Zealand. Conditions: seeds germinated in petri 

dishes on 25-27 Mar 1997 and pricked into seed trays of 

potting mix and placed in controlled glasshouse. Seedlings 

trimmed on 11 Apr 1997 and removed to open for 

hardening on 12 May 1997 and transplanted to open field 

trial on 26-27 May 97. Trial design: randomised block, 10 

replicates, 10 plants per plot, 60cm between plants. 

Measurements/scores: on all plants. 


Country Year Status Name Applied 

New Zealand 1997 Granted ‘Grasslands Excel’ 


Description: Jeff E. Miller, AgResearch Grasslands, Palmerston North, 

New Zealand 

30



Table 13 Dactylis varieties 

‘Grasslands *‘Grasslands *‘Grasslands *‘Grasslands *‘Grasslands *‘Saborto’ *‘Porto’ *‘Currie’ 

Excel’ Vision’ A Kara’ A Wana’ Tekapo’ 

______________________________________________________________________________________________________________ 

MEAN HEADING DATE (DAYS FROM 1ST FLOWERING) 

mean 52.75 27.62 29.89 30.71 21.18 33.79 28.13 16.24 

std deviation 3.83 5.48 7.93 4.72 8.16 6.43 8.78 6.09 

LSD/sig 2.37 P≤0.01 P≤0.01 P≤0.01 P≤0.01 P≤0.01 P≤0.01 P≤0.01 

______________________________________________________________________________________________________________ 

TILLER LEAF LENGTH (mm) 

mean 144.6 185.8 198.7 166.5 166.0 177.1 186.2 168.7 

std deviation 30.76 40.94 41.63 34.48 35.76 38.68 34.48 27.20 

LSD/sig 16.5 P≤0.01 P≤0.01 P≤0.01 P≤0.01 P≤0.01 P≤0.01 P≤0.01 

______________________________________________________________________________________________________________ 

TILLER LEAF WIDTH (mm) 

mean 10.52 11.53 11.37 10.51 9.69 12.45 11.43 10.96 

std deviation 1.54 1.50 1.78 1.66 1.73 1.86 1.79 1.64 

LSD/sig 0.79 P≤0.01 P≤0.01 ns P≤0.01 P≤0.01 P≤0.01 ns 

______________________________________________________________________________________________________________ 

FLAG LEAF LENGTH (mm) 

mean 288.4 299.7 328.5 293.5 255.1 351.4 232.4 258.6 

std deviation 62.73 59.32 80.03 69.43 57.14 74.10 65.73 55.93 

LSD/sig 23.90 ns P≤0.01 ns P≤0.01 P≤0.01 P≤0.01 P≤0.01 

______________________________________________________________________________________________________________ 

FLAG LEAF WIDTH (mm) 

mean 9.00 11.11 11.02 10.89 8.92 13.68 12.68 10.69 

std deviation 1.52 2.44 2.49 2.11 1.79 2.86 2.70 2.02 

LSD/sig 0.83 P≤0.01 P≤0.01 P≤0.01 ns P≤0.01 P≤0.01 P≤0.01 

______________________________________________________________________________________________________________ 

CULM LENGTH (mm) 

mean 1106.4 1085.1 1060.5 1037.3 985.2 925.2 947.7 1008.1 

std deviation 134.9 115.0 139.6 135.4 152.9 148.3 143.8 93.3 

LSD/sig 50.4 ns ns P≤0.01 P≤0.01 P≤0.01 P≤0.01 P≤0.01 

______________________________________________________________________________________________________________ 

CULM THICKNESS (mm) 

mean 2.93 3.25 3.33 3.09 2.34 3.87 3.28 n/a 

std deviation 0.63 0.65 0.68 0.53 0.47 0.75 0.59 n/a 

LSD/sig 0.21 P≤0.01 P≤0.01 ns P≤0.01 P≤0.01 P≤0.01 n/a 

______________________________________________________________________________________________________________ 

TOP INTERNODE LENGTH (mm) 

mean 337.4 388.7 353.7 362.2 376.1 285.2 289.2 347.2 

std deviation 56.96 69.38 74.34 67.90 71.11 81.79 93.36 56.35 

LSD/sig 25.7 P≤0.01 ns ns P≤0.01 P≤0.01 P≤0.01 ns 

______________________________________________________________________________________________________________ 

INFLORESCENCE LENGTH (mm) 

mean 253.7 295.4 265.1 255.7 244.9 264.9 297.0 267.9 

std deviation 47.41 73.18 55.11 50.65 55.83 50.03 54.95 55.24 

LSD/sig 19.90 P≤0.01 ns ns ns ns P≤0.01 ns 

______________________________________________________________________________________________________________ 

NUMBER OF PANICLE BRANCHES 

mean 9.35 9.76 10.85 10.91 6.63 7.57 7.74 6.49 

std deviation 1.89 1.61 1.87 1.73 1.40 1.55 1.26 1.38 

LSD/sig 0.58 ns ns P≤0.01 P≤0.01 P≤0.01 P≤0.01 P≤0.01 

______________________________________________________________________________________________________________ 

31


COMMON VETCH 

Vicia sativa 

‘Morava’ 

Application No: 99/012 Accepted: 20 Jan 1999. 

Applicant: Minister for Primary Industries, Natural 

Resources and Regional Development, Adelaide, SA and 


ACT. 

Characteristics (Table 14, Figure 47) Plant: common vetch 

suitable for hay, grain and green manuring, height tall, time 

of flowering mid season maturity (indeterminate), semierect. 

Foliage: at early stage both leaf and stem reddish later 

turns dark green colour (RHS 139A). Flower: colour redpurple 

(RHS 74A). Pod: shape straight, pod length 

50.71mm and maximum width 7.29mm, pod colour at 

maturity greyed-orange (RHS 164B). Seed: shape spherical, 

size small, cotyledon colour yellow-orange (RHS 23D), 

testa colour brown (RHS 200C). Disease resistance: highly 

resistant to rust (Uromyces viciae-fabae), resistant to 

Ascochyta. 


‘Blanchefleur’ x pollen parent IK-5, with final cross made 

in 1992. The parent plants were distinguishable from 

‘Morava’ in terms of flower and cotyledon colour, disease 

resistance, leaf and stem colour in early and later growth 

stages. A single-plant, single-row pedigree system was 

employed. Selection of single plants started with the F 2 

generation. In the F 3 generation selection made for grain 

and herbage yield, disease resistance and non-shattering of 

pods. Replicated yield trials started in F 4 . Selection criteria: 

increased grain and herbage yield, disease resistance, seed 

softness, non-shattering of pods at harvest and wide 

adaptation. Propagation: by seed. Breeder: Rade Matic, 

SARDI, Adelaide, SA. 

Choice of Comparators ‘Blanchefleur’ was included in the 

comparative trial as this is the main vetch variety of 

common knowledge. ‘Blanchefleur’ is also the seed parent. 

The pollen parent was not considered for the trial because 

‘Morava’ is clearly distinguishable from IK-5 in terms of 

growth habit (prostrate), seed coat colour and maturity 

(late). ‘Languedoc’ was not included because it is 

distinguishable from ‘Morava’ in terms of days to first 

flowering (90 days for ‘Languedoc’ vs 110 days for 

‘Morava’). 

Comparative Trial Comparator: ‘Blanchefleur’. Location: 

Charlick Field Experimental Station, University of Adelaide, 

located 70km south-east of Adelaide, SA. Conditions: plants 

were raised in fallowed open plots. Trial design: randomised 

complete blocks, each plot was sown as a paired row 8m in 

length. The rows were 1.2 m apart. Sowing rate was 45 seeds 

per plot. Measurements: 10 specimens per replication 

selected randomly from each plot. 


No prior applications. First sold in Australia in Apr 1999 

under the name ‘Morava’. 

Description: R. Matic, SARDI, A division of the Department of Primary 

Industries and Resources South Australia, Adelaide, SA. 

Table 14 Vicia varieties 

‘Morava’ *‘Blanchefleur’ 

____________________________________________________ 

PLANT: HEIGHT 

tall 

medium 

____________________________________________________ 

LEAF: COLOUR 

green 

yellow-green 

(RHS 139A) (RHS 147A) 

____________________________________________________ 

FLOWER: COLOUR OF STANDARD 

red-purple white 

(RHS 74A) (RHS 155A) 

____________________________________________________ 

POD: LENGTH (mm) 

mean 50.71 39.29 


LSD/sig 1.50 P≤0.01 

____________________________________________________ 

POD: TYPE OF CURVATURE 

medium 

weak 

____________________________________________________ 

POD: COLOUR AT MATURITY 

greyed-orange greyed-orange 

(RHS 164B) (RHS 165B) 

____________________________________________________ 

SEED: COLOUR OF COTYLEDON 

yellow-orange orange 

(RHS 23D) (RHS 25C) 

____________________________________________________ 

SEED WEIGHT (100 HARVESTED DRY SEEDS) (g) 

mean 8.31 6.59 

std deviation 0.12 0.21 

LSD/sig 0.21 P≤0.01 

____________________________________________________ 

DISEASE RESISTANCE 

leaf/stem rust (Uromyces viciae-fabae) 

highly resistant susceptible 

Ascochyta resistant susceptible 

Chocolate spot (Botrytis) 

tolerant 

susceptible 

____________________________________________________ 

CRIMSON CLOVER 

Trifolium incarnatum 

‘Blaza’ 

Application No: 99/146 Accepted: 9 Jun 1999. 

Applicant: SEEDCO, Hilton, SA. 

Characteristics (Table 15, Figure 61) Plant: annual, 

upright, moderately tall, mid to late season maturity. Stem: 

medium thickness, round cross section, branched in some 

plants, green or with some anthocyanin pigmentation, pithy 

core tending to slight hollow centre, moderately pubescent. 

Petiole: green or with some anthocyanin pigmentation in 

some plants, slightly pubescent. Leaf: large trifoliate, 

leaflets generally heart shaped with a slight indentation at 

the distal end of the midrib, green with variable anthocyanin 

pigmentation centred about the midrib, no other 

pigmentation, sparsely to moderately pubescent on both 

surfaces. Stipules: large, fleshy green upper lobe, pale green 

lower with prominent darker green veining. Inflorescence: 

large terminal spike, to ~ 6cm in length, cylindrical or cigar 

shaped, with up to 100 florets per spike, spike upright 

32



during flowering but drooping to horizontal after all florets 

are wilted, floret opening progressing from the proximal to 

the distal end of the spike over about two weeks. Floret: 

small to medium. Calyx: green, occasional crimson veining 

on the tube, villous, with 5 long pointed lobes that extend 

after pollination to give a stellate appearance to each floret 

at maturity. Corolla: small, pea type, distinct bright crimson 

when open. Seed: medium, one per floret, amber to yellow. 

Origin and Breeding Open Pollination and Recurrent 

Phenotypic Selection: derived from 3 cycles of phenotypic 

recurrent selection with open pollination between selections 

at each cycle. Original selections were predominantly from 

the cultivars ‘Tibbee’, ‘Autuga’ and ‘Frontier’, but also 

include outcrosses with about 30 other lines selected on the 

basis of plant habit, vigour and flowering time. ‘Tibbee’, 

‘Autuga’ and ‘Frontier’ are characterised by medium plant 

height and medium flowering. Selections were progeny 

tested for these characteristics, and nine progenies of 26 

original plants allowed to inter-pollinate. Progeny were then 

re-selected over two generations for trueness to the desired 

growth habit, vigour and flowering time. Selections of the 

second cycle were inter-pollinated to produce AZ 3280, 

which was observed to have superior growth characteristics 

to the parental lines. Seed of this line subsequently became 

breeder’s seed for ‘Blaza’. Selection criteria: taller plant 

height and later flowering. Propagation: by seed. Breeder: 

New Zealand Pastoral Agriculture Research Institute, 

(AgReasearch), Palmerston North, New Zealand. 

Choice of Comparators Currently there are only two 

crimson clover varieties of common knowledge available in 

Australia; ‘Caprera’ and ‘Contea’. Both were chosen as 

comparators. The predominant parental varieties, ‘Tibbee’, 

‘Autuga’ and ‘Frontier’ were not included because they are 

clearly distinct from ‘Blaza’ in plant height and flowering 

time as stated above. 

Comparative Trial Comparators: ‘Contea’, ‘Caprera’. 

Location: Currency Creek, or about 75km SSE of Adelaide, 

SA, between Jun and Nov 1999. Conditions: trial conducted 

in the field. The soil was a moderately fertile, free draining 

sandy loam of approximately pH 6. A single spring 

irrigation of approximately 40mm rainfall equivalent was 

applied in mid Oct to allow plots to mature with minimum 

water stress. No chemical or fertiliser treatments were used 

and plots were hand weeded as required. Trial design: a 

randomised complete block with 4 replicates, each of 25 

plants. Plants were seeded and raised in Jiffy 7 pellets in a 

shadehouse, and then transplanted into the field at 

approximately 4 weeks of age in late Jun 1999. Each 

replicate was comprised of 25 plants in 4 rows, with 20cm 

between plants and 50cm between rows. Measurements: 

from all plants, or from whole rows as indicated. 

Prior Applications and Sales Nil 

Description: Andrew W.H. Lake, Pristine Forage Technologies, Daw 

Park, SA. 

Table 15 Trifolium varieties 

‘Blaza’ *‘Caprera’ *‘Contea’ 

_______________________________________________ 

DAYS TO 1st FLOWER – First open flower in row of 25 plants 

mean 122.75 127.50 128.00 


LSD/sig 3.57 P≤0.01 P≤0.01 

_______________________________________________ 

DAYS TO 20% HEAD EMERGENCE – 20% of plants with at 

least one head emergent from bracts 

mean 125.25 127.75 129.25 


LSD/sig 2.34 P≤0.01 P≤0.01 

_______________________________________________ 

DAYS TO 80% COMPLETION OF FLOWERING – 80% of 

flower heads with all petals wilted 

mean 152.50 157.50 159.25 


LSD/sig 3.35 P≤0.01 P≤0.01 

_______________________________________________ 

DWARF CHILLI 

Capsicum annuum var. fasciculatum 

‘Orange Bantam’ 

Application No: 98/154 Accepted: 7 Sep 1998. 

Applicant: Prof. N F Derera, AM, ASAS Pty Ltd, Winston 

Hills, NSW. 

Agent: A. J. Newport and Son Pty Ltd, Winmalee, NSW. 

Characteristics (Table 16, Figure 30) Seedling: 

anthocyanin colouration present (faint). Plant: growth habit 

dwarf, height at flowering short (175mm), width medium 

(213mm), number of internodes between first flower and 

shortened internodes none, anthocyanin colouration at level 

of nodes medium. Leaf: length of blade medium to long 

(125mm), width medium to broad (38mm), length/width 

ratio 3.3. Flowers: borne on erect peduncles, colour white 

RHS 155A. Fruit: colour before maturity yellow green RHS 

144A and brown RHS ca 200A, attitude erect, diameter 

large (24.1mm), length medium to long (40mm), 

length/diameter ratio 1.67, volume medium (11500mm 3 ), 

predominant shape of longitudinal section triangular, 

predominant shape of cross section at level of placenta 

round, colour at maturity orange RHS 32A, glossiness 

strong, stalk cavity absent, apex shape acute, predominant 

number of locules 2 or 3, flesh thickness thick (3.5mm), 

weight medium (7.4g), placenta small, stalk length medium 

(26.8mm), stalk thickness medium to thick. Time of 

beginning of flowering early to medium, time of ripening 

early to medium. (Note: all RHS colour chart numbers refer 

to 1986 edition.) 


‘Bantam’ A . The parental variety is characterised by dark 

red (RHS 45A) mature fruit colour. An orange colour 

mutant (RHS 32A) was selected from ‘Bantam’ A at 

University of Sydney, Plant Breeding Institute, Cobbitty. 

Selection criteria: mature fruit colour, fruit number, dwarf 

plant habit, continuous flowering, spicy hot taste and 

attractive appearance. Propagation: by seed over 5 

generations. Breeder: Prof. N F Derera, AM, ASAS Pty Ltd, 

Winston Hills, NSW. 

33


Choice of Comparators ‘Bantam’ A and ‘Thimble’ A were 

initially considered for the comparative trial as these are 

similar varieties of common knowledge. ‘Thimble’ A was 

later excluded from the trial because of differing fruit 

colours (RHS 79B and 6 C-D before maturity and RHS 44A 

and RHS 45 at maturity) and shorter leaf lengths. 

‘Bantam’ A was used as a comparator because it is the 

maternal variety from which the candidate ‘Orange 

Bantam’ was derived. 

Comparative Trial Comparator ‘Bantam’ A . Location: 

A.J.Newport and Son Pty Ltd, Winmalee, Jul Nov 1999. 

Conditions: trials conducted in a greenhouse, plants 

propagated from seed at 23ºC in a commercial mix, 

seedlings planted out in 150mm pots containing 

commercial media, dripper irrigated, spacing at 20cm, 

nutrition, pest and disease treatment as required. Trial 

design: 30 plants of each variety arranged in a completely 

random design. Measurements: from all trial plants, one 



No prior applications. First Australian sale in 1998. 

Description: Melissa Hunt, A.J.Newport and Son Pty Ltd, Winmalee, 

NSW. 

Table 16 Capsicum varieties 

‘Orange Bantam’ *‘Bantam’ A 

____________________________________________________ 

PLANT: WIDTH AT FLOWERING (mm) 

mean 213 184 


LSD/sig 22 P≤0.01 

____________________________________________________ 

LEAF: LENGTH OF BLADE (mm) 

mean 125 112 



____________________________________________________ 

FRUIT: VOLUME (mm 3 ) 

mean 11500 13967 


LSD/sig 2382 P≤0.01 

____________________________________________________ 

FRUIT: COLOUR AT MATURITY (RHS, 1986) 

32A 

45A-46A 

____________________________________________________ 

FRUIT: PREDOMINANT NUMBER OF LOCULES 

2 or 3 3 

____________________________________________________ 

FRUIT: WEIGHT(g) 

mean 7.4 9.0 


LSD/sig 1.4 P≤0.01 

____________________________________________________ 

FRUIT: STALK LENGTH (mm) 

mean 26.8 24.6 


LSD/sig 1.8 P≤0.01 

____________________________________________________ 

ERIOSTEMON 

Philotheca myoporoides 

‘Lime Delight’ 


Applicant: R. J. Cherry, Kulnura, NSW. 

Characteristics (Table 17, Figure 17) Plant: vigorous, 

upright, branching, evergreen shrub. Stem: terete in cross 

section, verrucose, new stem growth lime-green 

(144B/151B) aging to deeper green (146B). Leaf: 

coriaceous, alternate, length 63mm (average), width 8mm 

(average), shape oblong to broadly obovate, concave in 

cross section, margin entire with weak undulation, apex 

mucronate, base cuneate, colour of mature leaves mid green 

(137A), new growth lighter (151A). Inflorescence: cyme. 

Flower: axillary, white (petal RHS 155D) with a very slight 

purple tinge to the back of the petal, size medium (average 

diameter 18.9mm). (Note: all RHS colour chart number 

refers to 1995 edition). 

Origin and Breeding Spontaneous mutation: in 1995, 

several thousand rooted cuttings were produced from 

Philotheca myoporoides (common form) at applicant’s 

nursery at Kulnura, NSW. One of these cuttings gave rise to 

a plant, which exhibited lighter coloured leaf and stem 

characteristics than the parent plant. Cuttings were taken 

from this sport and all resultant plants exhibited the same 

lighter colouration. Selection criteria: lighter leaf and stem 

colour. Propagation: asexually by cuttings through three 

generations to ensure uniformity and stability. Breeder: R. 

J. Cherry, Paradise Plants, Kulnura, NSW, Australia. 

Choice of Comparator The comparator used in this trial is 

Philotheca myoporoides (common form). This variety has 

been chosen as it is the most similar variety of common 

knowledge and is also the parent. 

Comparative Trial Comparator: Philotheca myoporoides 

(common form). Location: trial conducted at Paradise 

Plants, Kulnura, between 1997-1999. Conditions: plants 

raised on their own roots from cuttings. Grown in 200mm 

pots in commercial potting mix and potted up into 250mm 

pots after 1 year, grown under full sun with overhead 

watering. All plants were subjected to the same chemical 

treatments for crop protection and nutrition as required. 

Trial design: 12 plants of each variety arranged in a 

complete block. Measurements: taken from 10 plants of 

each variety. 


No prior application. First sold in Australia in May 1997. 

Description : John Robb, Paradise Plants, Kulnura, NSW. 

34



Table 17 Philotheca varieties 

‘Lime Delight’ *Philotheca 

myoporoides 

(Common Form) 

____________________________________________________ 

PLANT HABIT 

upright, branching upright, branching 

____________________________________________________ 


cross section terete terete 

texture verrucose verrucose 

stem: colour of new growth 

144B/151B 144A 

____________________________________________________ 


mature leaf colour 137A 137A 

main colour of new leaves 

151A 

146B 

margin colour of new leaves 

151A 

144A 

____________________________________________________ 


petal colour 155D 155D 

purplish tinge on reverse side of the petal 

less prominent more prominent 

____________________________________________________ 

Note: All RHS colour chart numbers refer to 1995 edition 

FIELD PEA 

Pisum sativum 

‘Cooke’ 



Australia, Perth, WA and Grains Research and 


Characteristics (Table 18, Figure 41) Plant: a high quality 

milling grade, conventional leaf type field pea, height tall, 

time of flowering medium to late, maturity medium, 

anthocyanin absent. Foliage: colour green, intensity light to 

medium. Leaf: conventional, medium to large, dentation 

very weak, usually 6 leaflets (average 5.97) per leaf at 1st 

fertile node, parchment weak, distance from widest point to 

base long. Stipule: well developed, flecking present, 

maximum intensity medium. Flower: white, shape of base 

of standard arched. Pod: shape straight or weak concave 

curvature, usually 2 per peduncle at 2nd fertile node, 4 to 5 

ovules (average 4.47) per pod, shape of distal part blunt. 

Seed: shape spherical, size medium (100 seed weight 15.7 

g), cotyledon colour yellow, dimple absent, testa; colour 

cream, plain, hilum black, shape of starch grains complex. 


‘Derrimut’ x pollen parent WA532 (a South Australian 

breeding line, code SA 1331). ‘Cooke’ has white flowers, 

cream coloured testa and black hilum which is easily 

distinguished from the seed parent ‘Derrimut’ which has 

coloured flowers, dun coloured testa and white hilum. 

‘Cooke’ is distinct from the pollen parent WA532, a semi 

leafless type while ‘Cooke is a conventional leaf type. The 

original cross was made in Western Australia in 1988, single 

plants selected in F 2 and F 2 derived F 3 to F 5 lines were 

evaluated over the next three years. Single plants were reselected 

from the promising F 2 derived F 5 lines to produce 

near homozygous lines. The F 5 derived F 8 lines were tested 

in breeders trials and then five years of performance testing 

in the Crop Variety Tests conducted by AGWEST in various 

regional locations in Western Australia. Selection criteria: 

increased seed quality and yield, agronomic adaptation to 

the agricultural regions of Western Australia. Propagation: 

by seed. Breeder: Dr. T Khan and Dr. R French, Agriculture 

Western Australia, South Perth, WA. 

Choice of Comparators ‘Laura’ and ‘Wirrega’ are white 

flowered, conventional leaf type varieties similar to 

‘Cooke’. Both ‘Laura’ and ‘Wirrega’ are most similar 

varieties of common knowledge in southern Australia. 

Comparative Trial Comparators: ‘Laura’ and ‘Wirrega’. 

Location: Avon Districts Agriculture Centre, Northam WA. 

Sown 2/6/99. Conditions: plants were in red loam pH 5.6 in 

CaCl 2 in open plots. The plots were treated with 2.2l/ha 

Bladex® plus glyphosate 2 days before seeding, Hoegrass® 

at 1.5l/ha on 1/7/99 and Sertin® at 250 ml/ha on 19/7/99 

where applied for grass control, no treatment for disease or 

insect control was required. Agras® No 1 at 120 kg/ha was 

drilled with the seed, all seed was inoculated with group E 

inoculum the day it was sown. Trial design: plants sown in 

randomised complete blocks 10m long by 1.42m (8 rows) 

wide by 2 replications. Measurements: taken from 10 

specimens per replicate selected randomly from 

approximately 2000 plants. 


Description: David Allen Collins, Northam, WA . 

Table 18 Pisum varieties 

‘Cooke’ *‘Laura’ *‘Wirrega’ 

____________________________________________________ 

HEIGHT AT FIRST FLOWER (mm) 

mean 1196.75 891.00 1049.00 

std deviation 128.76 107.14 97.86 

LSD/sig 95.31 P≤0.01 P≤0.01 

____________________________________________________ 

WIDTH OF FLOWER BASE (mm) 

mean 31.37 30.38 28.38 


LSD/sig 2.85 ns P≤0.01 

____________________________________________________ 

HEIGHT AT MATURITY (mm) 

mean 1602.00 1396.85 1301.00 

std deviation 227.37 314.64 190.96 

LSD/sig 209.41 ns P≤0.01 

____________________________________________________ 

100 SEED WEIGHT (g) (from harvest sample) 

mean 15.72 13.19 14.28 


LSD/sig 2.5 P≤0.01 ns 

____________________________________________________ 

HILUM: COLOUR 

black white white 

____________________________________________________ 

TESTA: COLOUR 

cream white white 

____________________________________________________ 

35


STIPULE: LENGTH (mm) (at 2nd fertile node) 

mean 75.49 67.87 69.97 


LSD/sig 6.81 P≤0.01 ns 

____________________________________________________ 

PEDUNCLE: LENGTH (mm) (at 1st fertile node) 

mean 106.43 83.41 77.10 

std deviation 21.65 19.18 15.91 

LSD/sig 16.15 P≤0.01 P≤0.01 

____________________________________________________ 

LEAFLET: WIDEST POINT TO BASE (mm) 

(at 2nd fertile node) 

mean 23.68 19.73 19.83 


LSD/sig 3.67 P≤0.01 P≤0.01 

____________________________________________________ 

‘Helena’ 



Australia, Perth, WA and Grains Research and 


Characteristics (Table 19, Figure 42) Plant: a milling 

grade, conventional leaf type field pea, height tall, time of 

flowering medium to late, maturity medium, anthocyanin 

present. Foliage: colour green, intensity medium. Leaf: 

conventional, medium to large, dentation very weak, 

usually 4 leaflets (average 4.25) per leaf at 1st fertile node, 

parchment weak, distance from widest point to base short. 

Stipule: well-developed, flecking present, maximum 

intensity medium. Flower: wing reddish purple, colour 

strong, standard intensity of colour medium, shape of base 

slightly arched. Pod: shape straight or weak concave 

curvature, usually 5 ovules (mean 4.7) per pod at 2nd fertile 

node, shape of distal part blunt. Seed: shape irregular, size 

small to medium (100 seed weight 14.1 g) cotyledon colour 

yellow, dimple present, testa; colour mainly green 

(classified dun), plain, hilum white, shape of starch grains 

complex. 


‘Dundale’ x pollen parent A130-465-3 (a South Australian 

breeding line). The seed parent ‘Dundale’ is earlier in 

flowering and has larger seed than ‘Helena’. The pollen 

parent A130-465-3 is distinguished from ‘Helena’ by its 

brown seed testa colour, ‘Helena’ has mainly green testa 

colour. The original cross was made in Western Australia in 

1988, single plants selected in the F 2 and F 2 derived F 3 to F 5 

lines were evaluated over the next three years. Single plants 

were reselected from the promising F 2 derived lines to 

produce near homozygous lines. The F 5 derived F 6 -F 8 lines 

were tested in breeders trials and five years of performance 

testing in the Crop Variety Tests conducted by AGWEST in 

various regional locations in Western Australia. Selection 

criteria: increased seed yield and seed quality, agronomic 

adaptation to the agricultural regions of Western Australia. 

Propagation: by seed. Breeder: Dr. T Khan and Dr. R 

French, Agriculture Western Australia, South Perth, WA. 

Choice of Comparators ‘Dundale’ and ‘Derrimut’ have 

coloured flowers, conventional leaf type and dun seed type 

similar to ‘Helena’. ‘Dundale’ is also the seed parent of 

‘Helena’. Both comparators are most similar varieties of 

common knowledge in southern Australia’. 

Comparative Trial Comparators: ‘Dundale’ and 

‘Derrimut’. Location: Avon Districts Agriculture Centre, 

Northam WA. Sown 2/6/99. Conditions: plants were in red 

loam pH 5.6 in CaCl 2 in open plots. The plots were treated 

with 2.2l/ha Bladex® plus glyphosate 2 days before 

seeding, Hoegrass® at 1.5l/ha on 1/7/99 and Sertin® at 250 

ml/ha on 19/7/99 where applied for grass control, no 

treatment for disease or insect control was required. Agras® 

No 1 at 120 kg/ha was drilled with the seed, all seed was 

inoculated with group E inoculum the day it was sown. Trial 

design: plants sown in randomised complete blocks 10m 

long by 1.42m (8 rows) wide by 2 replications. 

Measurements: taken from 10 specimens per replicate 

selected randomly from approximately 2000 plants. 


Description: David Allen Collins, Northam, WA. 


‘Helena’ *‘Derrimut’ *‘Dundale’ 

____________________________________________________ 

DAYS TO FIRST FLOWER 

mean 85.90 73.75 80.15 


LSD/sig 3.16 P≤0.01 P≤0.01 

____________________________________________________ 

HEIGHT AT FIRST FLOWER (mm) 

mean 1035.51 734.50 919.50 

std deviation 121.83 73.23 59.57 

LSD/sig 82.52 P≤0.01 P≤0.01 

____________________________________________________ 

WIDTH OF FLOWER BASE (mm) 

mean 32.01 27.03 33.31 



____________________________________________________ 

HEIGHT AT MATURITY (mm) 

mean 1475.75 1454.75 1666.50 

std deviation 183.52 232.99 195.21 

LSD/sig 175.79 ns P≤0.01 

____________________________________________________ 

100 SEED WEIGHT (g) (from harvest sample) 

mean 14.11 12.31 17.07 


LSD/sig 2.46 ns P≤0.01 

____________________________________________________ 

SEED: TESTA COLOUR 

95% green 65% green 45% green 

____________________________________________________ 

STIPULE: LENGTH (mm) (at 2nd fertile node) 

mean 81.37 65.87 84.19 

std deviation 7.59 10.24 10.82 

LSD/sig 8.11 P≤0.01 ns 

____________________________________________________ 

STIPULE: WIDTH (mm) (at 2nd fertile node) 

mean 47.58 36.30 48.59 


LSD/sig 5.62 P≤0.01 ns 

____________________________________________________ 

PEDUNCLE: LENGTH (mm) (at 1st fertile node) 

mean 98.19 80.04 116.69 

std deviation 19.24 13.41 13.43 

LSD/sig 14.56 P≤0.01 P≤0.01 

____________________________________________________ 

36



LEAFLET: LENGTH (mm) (at 2nd fertile node) 

mean 51.91 40.61 55.42 



____________________________________________________ 

LEAFLET: WIDTH (mm) (at 2nd fertile node) 

mean 32.74 23.64 32.37 


LSD/sig 5.34 P≤0.01 ns 

____________________________________________________ 

LEAFLET: WIDEST POINT TO BASE (mm) 

(at 2nd fertile node) 

mean 19.12 18.62 24.54 


LSD/sig 3.32 ns P≤0.01 

____________________________________________________ 

‘Mukta’ 

Application No: 99/053 Accepted: 3 Mar 1999. 




ACT. 

Characteristics (Table 20, Figure 43) Plant: quality white 

field pea, height semi-dwarf, time of flowering late, 

maturity medium (determinate), anthocyanin absent. 

Foliage: colour green (RHS 137D). Leaf: semi-leafless, 

stipule present, strong dentation along entire length, sparse 

flecking, stipule length and breadth 6.1 x 2.69cm. Flower: 

standard white (RHS 155D) and raised, peduncle length 

from stem to first flower 5.08cm. Pod: shape straight, no 

curvature, pod length and maximum width 6.6 x 1.02cm, 

pod colour at maturity greyed-orange (RHS 163B), number 

of ovule 6.4 (average). Seed: shape spherical, size large, 

shape of starch grain simple, cotyledon colour yelloworange 

(RHS 22A), testa colour orange-white (RHS 159A). 

Disease resistance: completely resistant to powdery mildew 

and septoria pisi, moderately resistant to downy mildew 

and has shown less susceptibility to Ascochyta blight than 

conventional dun type pea varieties. (Note: all RHS colour 

chart numbers refer to 1995 edition). 


breeding line M150-1x pollen parent S.A.1406, with final 

cross made in 1989. Breeding line M150-1 developed from 

complex crossing of Early Dun/SA966/SA916. The parent 

plants were distinguishable from ‘Mukta’ in terms of leaf 

type, anthocyanin pigmentation, flower and cotyledon 

colour as well as resistance to diseases. A single-plant, 

single-row pedigree system was employed. Selection of 

single plants commenced with the F 2 generation. In the 

F 3 -F 4 generations, emphasis was toward selection among 

families. ‘Mukta’ entered into replicated yield trials as 

M257-2-1 in 1993. Selection criteria: increased grain yield, 

lodging resistance, high grain quality and resistance to 

diseases. Propagation: by seed. Breeder: S. M. Ali, SARDI, 

Adelaide, SA. 

Choice of Comparators ‘Glenroy’ and ‘Laura’ were 

included in the comparative trial as ‘Mukta’ replaces them 

in terms of powdery mildew resistance. ‘Glenroy’ and 

‘Laura’ are the most widely grown white pea variety of 

common knowledge. ‘Mukta’ is easily distinguishable from 

two other newly released white pea varieties in Australia, 

‘Santi’ and ‘Snowpeak’, by the presence of strong dentation 

character of its stipule and multiple disease resistance. The 

parental genotypes were not considered for the trial because 

‘Mukta’ is clearly distinguishable from these lines in 

characteristics stated above. 

Comparative Trial Comparators: ‘Glenroy’ and ‘Laura’. 

Location: Charlick Field Experimental Station, University 

of Adelaide, located 70km south-east of Adelaide, SA. 

Conditions: plants were raised in fallowed open plots. Trial 

design: plots arranged in randomised complete blocks, each 

plot was sown as a paired row 3m in length. The rows were 

1m apart. Sowing rate was 40 seeds per plot. 

Measurements: 10 specimens per replication selected 

randomly from each plot. 



under the name M257-2-1. 

Description: S. M. Ali, SARDI, A division of the Department of Primary 

Industries and Resources South Australia, Adelaide,SA. 


‘Mukta’ *‘Glenroy’ *‘Laura’ 

____________________________________________________ 


orange white greyed green orange white 

(RHS 159A) (RHS 191B) (RHS 159A) 

____________________________________________________ 


mean 20.73 19.29 16.60 


LSD/sig 0.61 P≤0.01 P≤0.01 

____________________________________________________ 

POD: LENGTH (cm) 

mean 6.56 6.10 5.37 


LSD/sig 0.48 ns P≤0.01 

____________________________________________________ 

POD: NUMBER OF OVULES PER POD 

mean 6.4 5.5 6.2 


LSD/sig 1.11 ns ns 

____________________________________________________ 

PLANT: ANTHOCYANIN COLOURATION 

absent present absent 

____________________________________________________ 

PLANT: HEIGHT 

medium tall tall 

____________________________________________________ 

LEAF: COLOUR 

green green green 

(RHS 137D) (RHS 137C) (RHS 137D) 

____________________________________________________ 

LEAF: LEAFLETS 

absent absent present 

____________________________________________________ 

STIPULE: DENTATION 

strong weak medium 

(along entire (near base (near base 

length) only) only) 

____________________________________________________ 

STIPULE: LENGTH (cm) 

mean 6.11 7.48 5.68 

std deviation 0.11 0.12 0.10 

LSD/sig 0.15 P≤0.01 P≤0.01 

____________________________________________________ 

37


STIPULE: BREADTH(cm) 

mean 2.69 3.78 3.40 

std deviation 0.12 0.10 0.12 

LSD/sig 0.15 P≤0.01 P≤0.01 

____________________________________________________ 

FLOWER: LENGTH OF PEDUNCLE FROM STEM TO FIRST 

FLOWER (cm) 

mean 5.08 7.32 6.86 


LSD/sig 0.63 P≤0.01 P≤0.01 

____________________________________________________ 


white violet white 

(RHS 155D) (RHS 85A) (RHS 155D) 

____________________________________________________ 


powdery mildew highly highly susceptible 

resistant resistant 

downy mildew resistant susceptible susceptible 

Septoria pisi resistant susceptible susceptible 

Ascochyta blight moderately highly highly 

susceptible susceptible susceptible 

____________________________________________________ 

‘Parafield’ 





ACT. 

Characteristics (Table 21, Figure 44) Plant: dun field pea 

suitable for milling or stock feed, height tall, time of 

flowering mid season maturity (indeterminate), 

anthocyanin present, strong anthocyanin ring around the 

base of stipule, vein of the stipule and some on the stem 

persists until early to mid pod formation stage. Foliage: 

colour green (RHS 137B). Leaf: normal type, stipule 

present, medium dentation of the leaflets, sparse flecking of 

the stipule, stipule length and breadth 5.63 x 2.68cm. 

Flower: standard violet (RHS 85A) and raised, peduncle 

length from stem to first flower 8-10cm. Pod: shape 

straight, no curvature, pod length and maximum width 6.8x 

1.01cm, pod colour at maturity greyed-orange (RHS 163B), 

number of ovule 6.6 (average). Seed: shape spherical, size 

large, shape of starch grain simple, cotyledon colour 

yellow-orange RHS 22A), testa colour greyed-orange (RHS 

165A). (Note: all RHS colour chart numbers refer to 1995 

edition). 

Origin and Breeding Controlled Pollination: seed parent 

S.A. 343 x pollen parent line S.A. 1405, with final cross 

made in 1989. The parent plants were distinguishable from 

‘Parafield’ in terms anthocyanin pigmentation, leaf type, 

cotyledon colour, maturity and seed size. A single-plant, 

single-row pedigree system was employed. Selection of 

single plants commenced with the F 2 generation. In the 


families. ‘Parafield’ entered as unreplicated primary 

breeding trial as a selected bulked F 5 line (P503-3-4) in 

1993. It was promoted to replicated breeding trials in 1994, 

and into state-wide S4 trials in 1995. Selection criteria: 

increased grain yield, seedling vigour, mid-season maturity, 

non-shattering of pods at harvest and wide adaptation. 

Propagation: by seed. Breeder: S. M. Ali, SARDI, Adelaide, 

SA. 

Choice of comparators ‘Dundale’ and ‘Alma’ were 

included in the comparative trial as these are similar 

varieties of common knowledge. The parental genotypes 

were not considered for the trial because ‘Parafield’ is 

clearly distinguishable from these lines in characteristics 

stated above. 

Comparative Trial Comparators: ‘Dundale’ and ‘Alma’. 











under the name P503-3-4. 


Industries and Resources South Australia, Adelaide , SA. 


‘Parafield’ *‘Dundale’ *‘Alma’ 

____________________________________________________ 


greyed yellow greyed yellow greyed yellow 

(RHS 162A) (RHS 161A) (RHS 161A) 

____________________________________________________ 


mean 23.01 21.13 20.90 


LSD/sig 1.08 P≤0.01 P≤0.01 

____________________________________________________ 

POD: LENGTH (cm) 

mean 6.80 5.97 5.95 


LSD/sig 0.33 P≤0.01 P≤0.01 

____________________________________________________ 


mean 6.60 5.64 5.09 


LSD/sig 0.81 P≤0.01 P≤0.01 

____________________________________________________ 

PLANT: ANTHOCYANIN COLOURATION (EARLY POD 

FORMATION STAGE) 

strong faint faint 

____________________________________________________ 

LEAF: COLOUR 


(RHS 137B) (RHS 137D) (RHS 137C) 

____________________________________________________ 


medium weak weak 

____________________________________________________ 

STIPULE: LENGTH(cm) 

mean 5.63 7.20 8.65 

Std deviation 0.13 0.12 0.16 

LSD/sig 0.16 P≤0.01 P≤0.01 

____________________________________________________ 

STIPULE: BREADTH (cm) 

mean 2.68 4.54 4.22 

std deviation 0.10 0.13 0.12 

LSD/sig 0.16 P≤0.01 P≤0.01 

____________________________________________________ 

38




FLOWER (cm) 

8-10 8-10 8-10 

____________________________________________________ 


violet violet violet 

(RHS 85A) (RHS 85B) (RHS 85B) 

____________________________________________________ 

‘Santi’ 





ACT. 

Characteristics (Table 22, Figure 45) Plant: quality white 

field pea, height medium, time of flowering mid-season, 

maturity mid-season (determinate), plant anthocyanin 

absent. Foliage: colour green (RHS 137C). Leaf: semileafless, 

stipule present, medium stipule dentation at base 

only, flecking weak to nil, stipule length and breadth 7.53 x 

3.64cm. Flower: standard white (RHS 155D) and raised, 

peduncle length from stem to first flower 8.71cm. Pod: 

shape straight, no curvature, pod length and maximum 

width 6.66 x 1.22 cm, pod colour at harvest greyed-orange 

(RHS 163B), number of ovules 6.6 (average). Seed: shape 

spherical, size large, shape of starch grain simple, cotyledon 

colour yellow-orange (RHS 22A), testa colour yellow-white 

(RHS 158A). Disease resistance: moderately resistant to 

downy mildew and has shown some slight improvement in 

resistance to ascochyta blight over conventional dun pea 

varieties. (Note: all RHS colour chart numbers refer to 1995 

edition). 


breeding line M150-1 x pollen parent S.A.1406, with final 


complex crossing of Early Dun/SA966/SA916. ‘Santi’ is a 

sister line of ‘Mukta’. The parent plants were 

distinguishable from ‘Santi’ in terms of leaf type, testa 

colour, anthocyanin pigmentation, flower and cotyledon 

colour as well as resistance to downy mildew. A singleplant, 

single-row pedigree system was employed. Selection 

of single plants commenced with the F 2 generation. In the 


families. ‘Santi’ entered into replicated yield trials as M257- 

7-3 in 1993. Selection criteria: increased grain yield, 

reduced pod shattering at harvest lodging resistance, early 

maturity and high grain quality. Propagation: by seed. 

Breeder: S. M. Ali, SARDI, Adelaide, Australia. 

Choice of Comparators ‘Mukta’ was included in the 

comparative trial as ‘Santi’ is a sister line of ‘Mukta’ and is 

the most similar variety of common knowledge. ‘Bohatyr’ 

was selected as a similar white pea variety of common 

knowledge. ‘Santi’ is also easily differentiated from the 

most widely grown white pea variety ‘Laura’ in term of leaf 

type and seed size. ‘Laura’ has leaflets and small seed size 

compared to ‘Santi’, which has no leaflets and has large 

seed size. The parental genotypes were not considered for 

the trial because ‘Santi’ is clearly distinguishable from these 

lines in characteristics stated above. 

Comparative Trial Comparators: ‘Mukta’ and ‘Bohatyr’. 











under the name M257-7-3. 


Industries and Resources South Australia, Adelaide,SA. 


‘Santi’ *‘Mukta’ *‘Bohatyr’ 

____________________________________________________ 


yellow-white orange-white orange-white 

(RHS 158A) (RHS 159A) (RHS 159A) 

____________________________________________________ 

POD: MAXIMUM WIDTH(cm) 

mean 1.22 1.02 1.06 


LSD/sig 0.11 P≤0.01 P≤0.01 

____________________________________________________ 

POD: TYPE OF CURVATURE 

absent absent medium 

____________________________________________________ 


mean 6.6 6.4 5.2 


LSD/sig 1.11 ns P≤0.01 

____________________________________________________ 

PLANT: HEIGHT 

medium medium tall 

____________________________________________________ 

LEAF: COLOUR 


(RHS 137C) (RHS 137D) (RHS 137A) 

____________________________________________________ 



____________________________________________________ 

STIPULE: FLECKING 

weak to nil sparse medium 

____________________________________________________ 


medium strong medium 

at base only entire length at base only 

____________________________________________________ 

STIPULE: LENGTH (cm) 

mean 7.53 6.11 6.57 

std deviation 0. 15 0.11 0.13 

LSD/sig 0.15 P≤0.01 P≤0.01 

____________________________________________________ 

STIPULE: BREADTH (cm) 

mean 3.64 2.69 3.76 


LSD/sig 0.15 P≤0.01 ns 

____________________________________________________ 

39



FLOWER (cm) 

mean 8.71 5.08 8.13 


LSD/sig 0.63 P≤0.01 ns 

____________________________________________________ 


Downy mildew moderately resistant susceptible 

resistant 

____________________________________________________ 

‘Soupa’ 





ACT. 

Characteristics (Table 23, Figure 46) Plant: quality blue 

field pea, height medium, time of flowering late, maturity 

late (semi-determinate), plant anthocyanin absent. Foliage: 

colour green (RHS 137C), Leaf: 3-5 sets of leaflets, large 

stipule, strong dentation along entire length, sparse 

flecking, stipule length and breadth 8 x 4cm. Flower: 

standard white (RHS 155D) and raised, peduncle length 

from stem to first flower 6-8cm. Pod: shape straight, no 

curvature, pod length and maximum width 7.38 x 1.25cm, 

pod colour at maturity greyed-orange (RHS 163B), number 

of ovules 7.8 (average). Seed: shape spherical, size large, 

shape of starch grain simple, cotyledon colour green (RHS 

137A), testa colour green (RHS 138C). Disease resistance: 

moderately resistant to downy mildew and has shown less 

susceptibility to ascochyta blight over conventional dun pea 

varieties. (Note: all RHS colour chart number refer to 1995 

edition). 


breeding line M150-1 x pollen parent S.A. 1406, with final 


complex crossing of Early Dun/ SA966/SA916. ‘Soupa’ is 

a sister line of both ‘Mukta’ and ‘Santi’. The parent plants 

were distinguishable from ‘Soupa’ in terms of leaf type, 

stipule size and dentation, flower colour, seed type and size. 

A single-plant, single-row pedigree system was employed. 

Selection of single plants commenced with the F 2 

generation. In the F 3 -F 5 generations, emphasis was toward 

selection among families. ‘Soupa’ entered into replicated 

yield trials as M257-7-2 in 1993. Selection criteria: 

increased grain yield, seedling vigour, reduced bleaching of 

blue cotyledon colour at maturity, non-shattering of pod at 

harvest and high grain quality. Propagation: by seed. 

Breeder: S. M. Ali, SARDI, Adelaide, SA. 

Choice of Comparators ‘Bluey’ and ‘Jupiter’ were 

included in the comparative trial as these are similar 

varieties of common knowledge. ‘Bluey’, ‘Jupiter’ and 

‘Soupa’ are all blue pea varieties. The parental genotypes 

were not considered for the trial because ‘Soupa’ is clearly 

distinguishable from these lines in characteristics stated 

above. The sister lines ‘Mukta’ and ‘Santi’ were not 

considered because these are white pea varieties. 

Comparative Trial Comparators: ‘Bluey’ and ‘Jupiter’. 










No prior applications. 

First sold in Australia in Apr 1998 under the name M257-7-2. 


Industries and Resources South Australia, Adelaide, SA. 


‘Soupa’ *‘Bluey’ *‘Jupiter’ 

____________________________________________________ 

SEED: COLOUR OF COTYLEDON 


(RHS 137A) (RHS 137A) (RHS 137B) 

____________________________________________________ 



(RHS 138C) (RHS 138C) (RHS 138C) 

____________________________________________________ 

SEED WEIGHT(100 HARVESTED DRY SEEDS)(g) 

mean 21.56 22.50 25.90 

std deviation 0.57 0.89 1.12 

LSD/ sig 1.11 ns P≤0.01 

____________________________________________________ 

POD: LENGTH(cm) 

mean 7.38 5.47 6.04 


LSD/sig 0.49 P≤0.01 P≤0.01 

____________________________________________________ 

POD: MAXIMUM WIDTH(cm) 

mean 1.25 0.97 1.10 


LSD/sig 0.09 P≤0.01 P≤0.01 

____________________________________________________ 


mean 7.8 4.5 3.7 

Std deviation 0.42 0.53 0.48 

LSD/sig 0.59 P≤0.01 P≤0.01 

____________________________________________________ 

LEAF: COLOUR 


(RHS 137C) (RHS 137A) (RHS 137D) 

____________________________________________________ 


present absent present 

(3-5 sets) (2-3 sets) 

____________________________________________________ 

LEAF: LEAFLETS DENTATION 

very strong absent very weak 

____________________________________________________ 

STIPULE:”RABBIT-EARED”STIPULE 


____________________________________________________ 

STIPULE: LENGTH(cm) 

mean 8.10 6.5 4.4 


LSD/sig 0.56 P≤0.01 P≤0.01 

____________________________________________________ 

STIPULE: BREADTH(cm) 

mean 4.21 3.50 2.10 

40



std deviation 0.12 0.11 0.13 

LSD/sig 0.18 P≤0.01 P≤0.01 

____________________________________________________ 


downy mildew moderately susceptible susceptible 

resistant 

____________________________________________________ 

FLANNEL FLOWER 

Actinotus helianthi 

‘Starbright’ 

Application No: 97/067 Accepted: 18 Apr 1997. 

Applicant: Royal Botanic Gardens, Sydney, NSW. 

Characteristics (Table 24, Figures 26a, 26b) Plant: erect 

bushy shrub, height at flowering medium (mean 60cm), 

width at flowering wide (mean 28cm) with heavy branching 

(mean 7 at first flowering). Leaves: medium density on 

stem, leaf length medium (mean 68mm), width narrow 

(mean 52mm), large number of tertiary lobes (mean 32), 

predominant colour RHS 191A, upper leaf strongly 

pubescent. Stem: white pubescence. Inflorescence: umbel, 

consisting of flowers subtended by two rows of bracts that 

reflex on maturity (mean 11), diameter including bracts 

small (mean 76mm), individual bract length short (mean 

35mm) and bract width narrow (mean 8mm), predominant 

colour RHS 155C. Time of first flowering intermediate. 

(Note: all RHS chart numbers refer to 1986 edition). 

Origin and Breeding Recurrent Phenotypic Selection over 

nine years: phenotypes from a coastal population (Kurnell, 

NSW) were screened on the basis of plant habit, suitability 

for tissue culture and response to cultivated conditions. 

After 24 cycles of tissue culture and 7 cycles of vegetative 

propagation ‘Starbright’ proved to be different from the 

original population (Population 1) as well as a closely 

located populations (see Choice of Comparators). In 

addition, ‘Starbright’ has been shown to be different from 

more than 100 other populations collected throughout the 

natural area of occurrence of A. helianthi. Selection criteria: 

medium bushy habit, ability to be propagated by tissue 

culture, vigorous growth in cultivation, small-medium 

numerous flowers. Breeder: employees of the Mount Annan 

Botanic Garden, Mount Annan, NSW. 

Choices of Comparators There were no varieties of 

common knowledge at the time of this application. Through 

the wide screening of Flannel Flower selections conducted 

over nine years, no other varieties similar in their 

propagation ability, cultivation characteristics or 

morphological characteristics were observed in cultivation 

or in the wild. The comparators were therefore the most 

phenotypically similar plants selected from the source 

population (within 100 m of collection of source material) 

(‘Population 1’) and the next nearest population (300 m 

from source material) (‘Population 2’). 

Comparative Trial Comparators: Population 1 and 

Population 2. Location: Mount Annan Botanic Garden 

Nursery, Mount Annan NSW (Latitude 34º 05´ South, 

elevation 100m), autumn-spring 1999. Conditions: trial 

conducted in a polyhouse, plants propagated from cuttings, 

rooted cuttings potted into 175mm pots filled with soilless 

potting mix (coir, sand 1:4), nutrition maintained with slow 

release fertiliser, no pests or diseases recorded. Trial design: 

fifteen pots of each variety arranged in a completely random 

design. Measurements: from 13-15 plants of each variety. 

One sample per plant. 


No prior applications. First sold in Australia in Sep 1998. 

Description: Cathy Offord and Lotte von Richter, Mount Annan Botanic 

Garden, Mount Annan, NSW. 

Table 24 Actinotus varieties 

‘Starbright’ *A. helianthi *A. helianthi 

Population 1 Population 2 

____________________________________________________ 


mean 61.3 50.5 74.5 


LSD/sig 5.8 P≤0.01 P≤0.01 

____________________________________________________ 

PLANT WIDTH (cm) 

mean 27.9 22.0 19.0 


LSD/sig 5.8 P≤0.01 P≤0.01 

____________________________________________________ 

NUMBER OF BRANCHES 

mean 6.9 2.4 2.6 


LSD/sig 2.1 P≤0.01 P≤0.01 

____________________________________________________ 

LEAF NUMBER (first 15 cm) 

mean 16.4 19.9 15.9 


LSD/sig 3.05 P≤0.01 P≤0.01 

____________________________________________________ 


mean 68.1 81.1 66.5 

std deviation 9.3 12.9 16.3 

LSD/sig 12.7 P≤0.01 ns 

____________________________________________________ 


mean 52.5 63.5 54.9 



____________________________________________________ 

NUMBER OF TERTIARY LEAF LOBES 

mean 31.6 29.2 21.1 


LSD/sig 6.03 ns P≤0.01 

____________________________________________________ 

LEAF PUBESCENCE 

very high very high medium 

____________________________________________________ 

LEAF COLOUR (RHS 1986) 

191A 191A 147B 

____________________________________________________ 

INFLORESCENCE DIAMETER (mm) 

mean 76.1 82.5 104.2 


LSD/sig 16.3 ns P≤0.01 

____________________________________________________ 

BRACT LENGTH (mm) 

mean 34.7 36.6 46.5 


LSD/sig 8.5 ns P≤0.01 

____________________________________________________ 

41


BRACT WIDTH (mm) 

mean 7.7 9.7 11.1 


LSD/sig 2.3 P≤0.01 P≤0.01 

____________________________________________________ 

BEGINNING FLOWERING TIME (at Mount Annan, NSW) 

mid Sep late Sep early Sep 

____________________________________________________ 

GAURA 

Gaura lindheimeri 

‘So White’ 


Applicant: Hartley Lewis and Malcolm Lewis, Buckland 

Park, SA. 

Characteristics (Table 25, Figure 20) Plant: open 

spreading habit, height medium. Stem: green. Leaf: 

lanceolate to oblanceolate, margin undulating, colour green 

(RHS 137A). Inflorescence: diameter 28mm (average), 

petals 4, petal colour white (RHS 155C), sepals 2, sepal 

colour green at tips (RHS 141A) fading to greyed-green 

(RHS 192A), stamens 8, anther colour yellow (RHS 12C) 

on flower opening changing to yellow-orange (RHS 22A) at 

maturity of pollen. (Note: all RHS chart refers to 1986 

edition.) 

Origin and Breeding Open Pollination followed by 

seedling selection: large quantity of open-pollinated seed 

was collected from Gaura lindheimeri grown in applicant’s 

property. The parental variety was characterised by upright 

growth habit; cream flowers with pink red tinge to the base 

of the flower and pronounced purple leaf spotting. ‘So 

White’ was selected from the batch of open-pollinated 

seedlings for the following combination of characteristics. 

Selection criteria: compact habit, pure white flowers and 

absence of purple leaf spotting. Propagation: by cuttings. 

Breeder: Hartley R. Lewis, Buckland Park, SA. 

Choice of Comparators ‘Snow Cloud’ was chosen for its 

similarity to ‘So White’ in flower colour. Gaura lindheimeri 

was included because it is the original source material from 

which the variety was selected. No other similar varieties of 

common knowledge have been identified. 

Comparative Trial: Comparators: ‘Snow Cloud’, Gaura 

lindheimeri. Location: Buckland Park, SA, summer – 

autumn 1999. Conditions: trial conducted in polyhouse. 

Plants propagated from cuttings. Rooted cuttings planted 

into 250mm pots filled with soilless potting mix (pine bark 

base). Nutrition maintained with slow release fertiliser, pest 

and disease treatments applied as required. Trial design: 10 

pots of each variety arranged in a completely randomised 

design. Measurements: from ten plants at random. One 



First sold in Australia in Oct 1997. Overseas sales nil. 

Description: Hartley Lewis, Buckland Park SA. 

Table 25 Gaura varieties 

‘So *‘Snow *G. lindheimeri 

White’ Cloud’ 

____________________________________________________ 

PLANT HABIT compact compact upright 

spreading spreading open 

____________________________________________________ 

STEM 

base of stem 137A 138D 61B 

mid stem 137A 138D 138B 

____________________________________________________ 


137C 138D 138B 

no leaf spots 

leaf spots on 

older leaves 61B 

____________________________________________________ 

FLOWER COLOUR (RHS, 1986) 

petals 155C 155C 155D 

sepals 141A at top 141A 66C 

fading to192A 

____________________________________________________ 

FLOWER NUMBERS ON TERMINAL SPIKELETS 

mean 11.1 14.9 35.6 


LSD/sig 1.35 P≤0.01 P≤0.01 

____________________________________________________ 


mean 9.55 12.6 11.05 


LSD/sig 0.39 P≤0.01 P≤0.01 

____________________________________________________ 

SEPAL LENGTH (mm) 

mean 1.93 1.52 1.41 

std deviation 0.064 0.124 0.109 

LSD/sig 0.096 P≤0.01 P≤0.01 

____________________________________________________ 

SPIKE LENGTH (cm) 

mean 13.9 16.9 24.6 


LSD/sig 1.70 P≤0.01 P≤0.01 

____________________________________________________ 

KANGAROO PAW 

Anigozanthos hybrid 

‘Bush Pearl’ 


Applicant: Yates Botanicals Pty Ltd, Somersby, NSW. 

Characteristics (Table 26, Figure 21) Plant: habit compact 

rhizomatous, many inflorescences, height short, flowering 

14-16 weeks from tissue culture. Leaf: attitude uprightsemi-upright, 

slightly curved, weakly pubescent margin, 

length short, width narrow, colour green (RHS 137A-B). 

Inflorescence: tertiary ramification present, medium total 

number of flowers. Flower: perianth tube profile parallel to 

flared distally, perianth lobe reflexing absent to slightly 

reflexed, perianth tube length medium, perianth tube width 

narrow-medium, single coloured hairs on perianth tube, 

ovary and pedicel red-purple (RHS 67A-B), inner perianth 

tube colour green (RHS 144B), four anthers at top of 

perianth, anther/pollen colour yellow (RHS 13A), stigma 

above anthers. (Note: all RHS colour chart numbers refer to 

1995 edition.) 

42




‘Bush Lantern’ x pollen parent Anigozanthos flavidus. The 

seed parent is a hybrid between A. bicolor and A. humilis, 

characterised by yellow flowers. The pollen parent had pink 

flowers and dwarf growth habit. Hybridisation took place at 

Somersby, NSW in 1995. Seed were germinated in vitro 

with subsequent individual seedlings multiplied and tested 

as pot plants and in ground over three years. Selection 

criteria: flower colour and form, plant habit, disease 

tolerance, non-seasonal flowering and stable and productive 

micropropagation performance. Propagation: vegetative by 

micropropagation. Breeders: Angus Stewart and Mark 

Bennett, Biotech Innovations Pty Ltd (formerly Biotech 

Plants Pty Ltd), Somersby, NSW. 

Choice of Comparators ‘Pink Joey’ was chosen for its 

similar flower and inflorescence form. The seed parent was 

not considered for the trial because it has a different yellow 

flower colour. No other similar varieties have been 

identified. 

Comparative Trial Comparator: ‘Pink Joey’. Location: 

Kincumber, NSW, spring-summer 1998/99. Conditions: 

trial conducted in open beds, plants micropropagated, 

rooted plants planted into 150mm pots filled with soilless 

potting mix, nutrition maintained with slow release 

fertilisers, pest and disease treatments applied as required. 

Trial design: fifteen pots of each variety arranged in a 

completely randomised design. Measurements: from ten 

plants at random. One sample per plant. 


No Prior Applications. First sold in Australia in 1997. 


NSW. 

Table 26 Anigozanthos varieties 

‘Bush Pearl’ *‘Pink Joey’ 

____________________________________________________ 

PLANT HEIGHT (cm) – to top of leaves 

mean 30.8 47.3 


LSD/sig 4.4 P≤0.01 

____________________________________________________ 

LEAF LENGTH (cm) – basal mature leaf 

mean 24.6 34.3 


LSD/sig 4.6 P≤0.01 

____________________________________________________ 

NUMBER OF FLOWERS PER INFLORESCENCE 

– on first flowering stem 

mean 15.9 9.3 


LSD/sig 4.2 P≤0.01 

____________________________________________________ 

PERIANTH TUBE WIDTH (mm) – at middle tube 

mean 4.0 5.2 


LSD/sig 0.9 P≤0.01 

____________________________________________________ 

LEAF 

curvature slight straight 

margin hairs weak absent to 

very weak 

____________________________________________________ 

FLOWER: REFLEXING OF PERIANTH LOBES 

absent to slight absent 

____________________________________________________ 

FLOWER: COLOUR OF (RHS, 1995) 

inner perianth green 144B green 144A 

anther/pollen yellow 13A yellow-orange 17B 

____________________________________________________ 

POSITION OF STIGMA IN RELATION TO ANTHERS 

above 

level 

____________________________________________________ 

BEGINNING OF FLOWERING 

early 

late 

____________________________________________________ 

KIWIFRUIT 

Actinidia deliciosa 

‘Tomua’ 

Application No: 98/093 Accepted: 3 Jul 1998. 

Applicant: The Horticulture and Food Research 

Institute of New Zealand Ltd, Palmerston North, New 

Zealand. 

Agent: Collison & Co, Adelaide, SA. 

Characteristics (Table 27, Figure 27) Plant: sex female, 

ploidy hexaploid, habit moderately vigorous vine, early 

season maturing (first week of Apr in NZ). Young shoot: 

velutinous, anthocyanin weak. Stem: medium diameter, 

red-brown colour (RHS 165A), medium bark covered in 

bristly hairs and conspicuous grey-orange lenticels colour 

(RHS 164B-164C), lenticel number medium, bud almost 

completely buried, few bud hairs visible on dormant canes, 

leaf scar on dormant canes medium. Leaf: broadly ovate, 

cuspidate tip, cordate base, leaf bases overlapping, medium 

density of hairs on main veins of upper surface, few hairs 

between main veins on upper surface, medium density of 

hairs on both main veins and between veins on lower 

surface, flat profile in cross section, margin ciliate, medium 

puckering on upper side of blade, upper surface medium 

green colour (RHS 137A –137B), lower surface light green 

colour (RHS 147B-147C), glaucosity absent on lower 

surface of blade, variegation absent, spines on main veins of 

lower side absent, hairs on petiole medium density, 

anthocyanin colouration on upper side of petiole weak. 

Inflorescence :predominate number of flowers one. Flower: 

early, pedicel length long, diameter very large (mean 

52.9mm), pedicel hairs medium, number of sepals >5, 

colour of sepals greenish-brown, petals overlapping, petals 

curving upwards at tip, petal shoulder present, petal 

margins crimped, petal primary colour white (RHS 155D), 

petal base colour light green, petal colour distribution even, 

petals remain cupped around ovary after pollination, 

filament colour white, anther colour yellow, number of 

styles many (mean 41.5), colour of styles white, styles 

semi-erect and slightly curved, hair at base of styles short, 

amount of hair on ovary strongly expressed. Fruit: medium 

size (mean 99g), general shape ovoid, length 79.1mm, 

maximum width 53.1 mm, minimum width 49.1 mm, cross 

section at median elliptical, ridging absent, shape of stylar 

end raised, shape of shoulder on stalk end rounded, sepals 

present at harvest, adherence of skin to flesh medium (not 

easy to peel), lenticels absent on skin, skin colour when ripe 

reddish brown (RHS 165B), hairs on skin medium, type of 

hair hirsute, distribution of hair uniform, colour of hairs at 

harvest brown, adherence of hairs to skin when rubbed 

43


weak, core diameter medium-large (mean 13.7 mm), core 

shape elliptical, core woody spike sometimes present, outer 

pericarp colour at maturity (fruit soft) light green (RHS 

138B-138D), inner pericarp colour at maturity (fruit soft) 

green (RHS 138B-138D), fruit core colour at maturity (fruit 

soft) greenish white (RHS 155A-155B), fruit seed colour at 

harvest, while still in flesh, black (RHS 200A), seed colour 

when dry, brown (RHS 165A-165B), brix level at maturity 

for consumption medium (mean 14.3%), titratable acidity at 

maturity high, vitamin C content medium. Plant: time of 

vegetative budbreak early (mid Sep), time of beginning of 

flowering medium (early Nov), time of maturity for harvest 

medium (early Apr). (Note: all RHS colour chart numbers 

refer to 1986 edition.) 


‘Hayward’ x pollen parent DA02_03. The seed parent was 

characterised by green flesh, medium core, fruit size 100g, 

tangy flavour, slightly flattened ovoid shape. The pollen 

parent was chosen because it was one of the earliest 

flowering males in DA02. Crossing took place in Nov 1983 

in New Zealand. From this cross seedling number 47-5-5d, 

code ‘Hort DA1’, later named ‘Tomua’ was selected in 

1990. Selection criteria: very early maturing (4-5 weeks 

ahead of ‘Hayward’), medium fruit size, sweet tasting, 

green coloured flesh, hair easily brushed off. ‘Tomua’ can 

be distinguished from the seed parent, ‘Hayward’ by the 

shape of the stylar end of the fruit being more pointed, the 

hairs of the fruit being more bristly and easily removed by 

light brushing, the skin of the fruit being more reddishbrown, 

earlier budbreak and flowering date and a harvest 

date 4 weeks ahead of ‘Hayward’. The petals on flowers of 

‘Tomua’ remain cupped around the ovary after pollination 

whereas those of ‘Hayward’ rise or fold back to expose the 

ovary. Propagation: ‘Tomua’ will be propagated by 

vegetative cuttings or by grafting on to seedling or clonal A. 

deliciosa rootstocks. Breeders: Russell Lowe, Hinga Marsh, 

The Horticulture and Food Research Institute of New 

Zealand Ltd. 

Choice of Comparator ‘Hayward’ is the most common 

kiwifruit grown world-wide and is the closest similar 

variety of common knowledge. ‘Hayward’ is also the seed 

parent of the candidate variety. The pollen parent was not 

considered for the trial as kiwifruit plants are dioecious and 

thus male plants produce no fruit. 

Comparative Trial Comparator: ‘Hayward’. Location: Te 

Puke Research Centre, Te Puke, New Zealand (Latitude 37º 

49´ South) 1993/97. Conditions: a fully replicated trial was 

planted in 1990. Rootstocks used were clonal ‘Hayward’ 

cuttings. 10 replicates of each selection were planted. Vine 

spacing was 5m between rows and 6m between plants in the 

row. Measurements: taken from each plant at random, one 




New Zealand 1994 Granted ‘Tomua’ 

USA 1997 Accepted ‘Tomua’ 

EU 1998 Accepted ‘Tomua’ 

Japan 1998 Accepted ‘Tomua’ 

First sold in Belgium in May 1997. First sale in Australia Nil. 

Description: Russell G. Lowe, The Horticulture and Food Research 

Institute of New Zealand Ltd, Te Puke, New Zealand. 

Table 27 Actinidia varieties 

‘Tomua’ *‘Hayward’ 

____________________________________________________ 

PLANT CHARACTERISTICS 

sex expression female female 

ploidy hexaploid hexaploid 

____________________________________________________ 

YOUNG SHOOT CHARACTERISTICS 

hairs present present 

density of hair medium medium 

hair type velutinous hirsute 

anthocyanin coloration in growing tip 

weak 

absent 

____________________________________________________ 


colour on upper side of shoot 

red-brown brown 

conspicuousness of lenticels 

conspicuous conspicuous 

number of lenticels medium medium 

colour of lenticels grey-orange grey-brown 

size of bud support medium small-medium 

visibility of bud almost buried almost buried 

number of hairs on bud few 

few 

____________________________________________________ 


general shape of blade broadly ovate broadly ovate 

shape of tip of blade cuspidate cuspidate 

shape of base of blade cordate cordate 

base arrangement overlapping overlapping 

margin ciliate ciliate 

puckering on upper side of blade 

medium 

medium 

colour of upper side of blade 

medium 

medium-dark 

RHS 137A – 137B RHS 147A 

colour of lower side of blade 

light green light green 

RHS 147B-147C 147C 

glaucosity absent absent 

____________________________________________________ 


predominate number of flowers 

one 

one 

colour of sepals greenish-brown greenish-brown 

diameter of ‘king’ flower 

very large very large 

arrangement of petals overlapping overlapping 

curvature of petals (longitudinal) 

curved upwards curved upwards 

orientation of petals after pollination 

remain cupped rise above 

horizontal 

primary colour when open 

white 

white 

type of coloration self-coloured self-coloured 

base colour of petal green green 

colour distribution even even 

attitude of styles semi-erect semi-erect 

curvature of styles slightly curved strongly curved 

____________________________________________________ 

FRUIT CHARACTERISTICS 

overall size medium large 

general shape ovoid ellipsoidal 

cross section at median elliptical 

elliptical 

shape of stylar end raised flat 

shape of shoulder (stalk end) 

rounded 

rounded 

44



skin colour at maturity reddish-brown brown 

RHS 165B RHS 199A 

skin colour change during ripening 

absent 

absent 

hairs present present 

density of hairs medium medium 

type of hair hirsute hirsute 

colour of hair brown brown 

concentration of hairs uniform uniform 

adherence of hairs to skin 

weak 

strong 

core diameter (max) medium to large large 

core shape cross section 

elliptical 

elliptical 

core woody spike sometimes present sometimes present 

prominence of core woody spike 

weak 

weak 

outer pericarp colour light green green 

RHS 138B-138D RHS 138A 

inner pericarp colour (locules) 

green RHS 138B-D green RHS 138A 

core colour at maturity greenish-white greenish-white 

sweetness (Brix) at maturity 

medium 

low 

vitamin C content medium medium 

titratable acidity (as citric acid) at maturity 

high 

medium 

____________________________________________________ 

MATURITY CHARACTERISTICS 

time of vegetative budbreak 

early 

medium 

time of beginning of flowering 

medium 

late 

time of maturity for harvest 

medium 

very late 

____________________________________________________ 

(Note: all RHS colour chart numbers refer to 1986 edition) 

LAVENDER 

Lavandula stoechas 

‘Darling Crown’ 


Applicant: Kristine and Geofrey Napier, Martin, WA. 

Agent: Wyve Horticultural Services, Lilydale, VIC. 

Characteristics (Table 28, Figure 23) Plant: semi upright 

aromatic shrub, size medium to tall. Stem: upright, weakly 

pubescent. Leaf: opposite, decussate, length mean 

36.80mm, width narrow mean 5.3mm, shape linear, mostly 

straight, margin entire, recurved, acute apex, base sessile, 

leaf colour green RHS 137A, pubescence weak, aromatic. 

Inflorescence: spike, peduncle absent. Spike: length mean 

21.40mm, mean width 12.5mm. Flower: petal colour purple 

RHS 79A. Terminal bract: length long mean 19.70mm, 

width narrow mean 9.20mm, shape linear, margin 

undulating, colour purple RHS 77B. (Note: all RHS colour 

chart numbers refer to 1995 edition.) 

Origin and Breeding Open pollination followed by 

seedling selection: ‘Darling Crown’ arose as the result of a 

single cycle of seedling selection from open pollinated of 

Lavandula stoechas (common form) at applicant’s property 

at Roleystone, WA. The parental plants were characterised 

by one single upright flower head where as the selected 

seedling was characterised by twelve smaller flower heads 

and bracts radiating outwards from the base of the central 

upright flower structure. ‘Darling Crown’ has been 

propagated for at least 5 generations to ensure uniformity 

and stability. Selection criteria: basal radiating flower 

spikes, flower and bract colours. Breeder: K Napier, 

Roleystone, WA. Propagation: vegetative. 

Choice of Comparators Lavandula stoechas ‘Winter 

Purple’ was chosen because it is the closest variety of 

common knowledge. Lavandula stoechas (common form) 

was not considered because it is clearly distinguishable 

from the candidate by the characteristic stated above. 

Comparative Trial Comparator: ‘Winter Purple’. 

Location: Lilydale, VIC, winter-spring 1999. Conditions: 

trial conducted in polyhouse, plants propagated from 

cutting, rooted cuttings planted into 140mm pots filed with 

soilless potting mix (pine bark base), nutrition maintained 


applied as required. Trial design: ten pots of each variety 


Measurements: from all trial plants, one sample per plant. 


Description: Mark Lunghusen, Croydon, VIC. 

Table 28 Lavandula varieties 

‘Darling Crown’ *‘Winter Purple’ 

____________________________________________________ 

PEDUNCLE 

absent 

present 

____________________________________________________ 

TERMINAL BRACT LENGTH (mm) 

mean 19.70 16.00 


LSD/sig 2.85 P≤0.01 

____________________________________________________ 

TERMINAL BRACT LENGTH/WIDTH RATIO 

mean 28.90 23.10 


LSD/sig 4.31 P≤0.01 

____________________________________________________ 


mean 36.80 30.00 


LSD/sig 3.29 P≤0.01 

____________________________________________________ 

LEAF LENGTH/WIDTH RATIO 

mean 42.10 36.00 


LSD/sig 3.55 P≤0.01 

____________________________________________________ 


green 

green 

137A 

138A 

____________________________________________________ 

FLOWER PETAL COLOUR (RHS, 1995) 

purple 

violet 

79A 

83A 

____________________________________________________ 

TERMINAL BRACT COLOUR (RHS, 1995) 

purple 

purple-violet 

77B 

80B 

____________________________________________________ 

BASAL SPIKES 

present 

absent 

____________________________________________________ 

45


LAVENDER 

Lavandula stoechas ssp pedunculata 

‘Willowbridge Wings’ 


Applicant: Willowbridge Perennials, Tuakau, New 

Zealand. 

Agent: Greenhills Propagation Nursery, Tynong, VIC. 

Characteristics (Table 29, Figure 24) Plant: semi upright 

aromatic shrub, size medium to tall. Stem: upright, 

pubescent. Leaf: opposite, decussate, size long (mean 

65.9mm), width narrow (mean 4.9mm), shape linear, 

mostly straight, margin entire, recurved, acute apex, base 

sessile, leaf colour green RHS 78B, pubescence strong, 

aromatic. Inflorescence: spike, peduncle mean length 

69.30mm, peduncle colour greyed-green RHS 195B. Spike: 

mean length 25.20mm, mean width 16.50mm. Flower: 

colour purple RHS 78B. Terminal bract: length long (mean 

44.70mm) width narrow (mean 7.40mm), shape linear, 

margin undulating, colour green-white RHS 157B. (Note: 

all RHS colour chart numbers refer to 1995 edition.) 


seedling selection: ‘Willowbridge Wings’ arose as the result 

of a single cycle of seedling selection from open pollinated 

‘Willowbridge White’ A at applicant’s property in New 

Zealand. Selection criteria: plant form, growth habit and 

flower colour. Propagation: vegetative through at least 5 

generations. Breeder: W R and L C Young, Willowbridge 

Perennials, Tuakau, New Zealand. 

Choice of Comparators ‘Willowbridge White’ A was 

chosen because it is the seed parent and is considered to be 

similar to ‘Willowbridge Wings’. ‘Marshwood’ A was 

chosen because it is suspected as a pollen source. 

Comparative Trial Comparator: ‘Willowbridge White’ A , 

‘Marshwood’ A . Location: Tynong North, VIC, winterspring 

1999. Conditions: trial conducted in an open field, 

plants propagated from cutting, rooted cuttings planted into 

140mm pots filed with soilless potting mix (pine bark base), 

nutrition maintained with slow release fertilisers, pest and 

disease treatments applied as required. Trial design: ten pots 

of each variety arranged in a completely randomised design. 

Measurements: from thirty plants at random. One sample 

per plant. 



New Zealand 1998 Applied ‘Willowbridge Wings’ 

First sold in New Zealand in Nov 1996. 

Description: Mark Lunghusen, Croydon, VIC. 

Table 29 Lavandula varieties 

‘Willowbridge *‘Willowbridge*‘Marshwood’ A 

Wings’ White’ A 

____________________________________________________ 


mean 69.3 70.2 92.7 

std deviation 12.54 7.69 11.67 

LSD/sig 11.29 P≤0.01 P≤0.01 

____________________________________________________ 

SPIKE LENGTH (mm) 

mean 25.20 26.60 24.70 


LSD/sig 3.39 ns ns 

____________________________________________________ 

SPIKE WIDTH (mm) 

mean 16.5 14.20 13.70 


LSD/sig 1.59 P≤0.01 P≤0.01 

____________________________________________________ 

SPIKE LENGTH/WIDTH RATIO 

mean 1.53 1.88 1.82 


LSD/sig 0.25 P≤0.01 P≤0.01 

____________________________________________________ 

TERMINAL BRACT LENGTH (mm) 

mean 44.70 18.60 35.40 


LSD/sig 4.68 P≤0.01 P≤0.01 

____________________________________________________ 

TERMINAL BRACT WIDTH (mm) 

mean 7.40 11.20 7.20 


LSD/sig 2.19 P≤0.01 ns 

____________________________________________________ 

TERMINAL BRACT LENGTH/WIDTH RATIO 

mean 6.22 1.71 5.23 


LSD/sig 1.91 P≤0.01 ns 

____________________________________________________ 


mean 65.90 31.50 51.30 


LSD/sig 5.59 P≤0.01 P≤0.01 

____________________________________________________ 


mean 4.90 5.50 3.90 


LSD/sig 0.87 P≤0.01 P≤0.01 

____________________________________________________ 

LEAF LENGTH/WIDTH RATIO 

mean 13.54 6.10 13.27 


LSD/sig 2.76 P≤0.01 ns 

____________________________________________________ 

LEAF COLOUR (RHS) 


141B 138A 137C 

____________________________________________________ 

FLOWER COLOUR (RHS) 

purple violet purple 

78B 83A 79A 

____________________________________________________ 

TERMINAL BRACT COLOUR (RHS) 

green-white white red-purple 

157B 155B 74B 

____________________________________________________ 

46



PEDUNCLE COLOUR (RHS) 

greyed-green green yellow-green 

195B 140B 144B 

____________________________________________________ 

HABIT 

tall compact medium compact 

____________________________________________________ 

LEAF PUBESENCE 

strong medium strong 

____________________________________________________ 

TERMINAL BRACT SHAPE 

linear obovate linear-elliptical 

____________________________________________________ 

LILLY PILLY 

Syzygium australe 

‘Elegance’ 


Applicant: Brent E Wilson and A Rex Wilson, Logan 

Reserve, QLD. 

Characteristics (Table 30, Figure 22) Plant: erect, dense, 

compact, medium, evergreen perennial shrub. Stem: 

upright, narrow, internodes medium. Leaf: lanceolate, 

length small (mean 52.30mm), width medium (mean 

17.63mm). Mature leaf colour RHS 147A, partially mature 

leaf colour RHS 146A, new foliage colour RHS 200B. 

Flower: sepal 4, petal 4, stamens numerous. (Note: all RHS 

colour chart numbers refer to 1995 edition). 


seedling selection: seeds were collected from open 

pollinated common form of Syzygium australe growing in 

applicant’s property in Logan Reserve, QLD. Seeds were 

germinated and several seedlings were raised for evaluation. 

One seedling was selected from the batch for its dense 

compact growth habit and dark coloured leaves. This 

selection now known as ‘Elegance’, was vegetative 

propagated through seven generations to confirm its 

uniformity and stability. Selection criteria: compact growth 

habit, dark colour of foliage. Propagation: vegetatively 

through cuttings. Breeder: Rex Wilson, Logan Reserve, 

QLD. 

Choice of Comparator ‘Aussie Boomer’ A was chosen as 

the comparator because of its similarity in the growth habit 

with the candidate variety. The Qualified Person considers 

it as the most similar variety of common knowledge. 

‘Blaze’ A , ‘Bush Christmas’ and ‘Tiny Trev’ A were 

excluded because of their distinctly different vegetative 

form and leaves. The common form of Syzygium australe 

was also excluded because the candidate variety is easily 

distinguishable by its compact growth habit and dark 

coloured foliage. No other similar varieties of common 

knowledge have been identified. 

Comparative Trial Comparator: ‘Aussie Boomer’ A . 

Location: Kookaburra Park Nursery, Logan Reserve, QLD. 

Conditions: plants from cuttings raised in 140mm pots 

grown in full sun. Trial design: 30 plants of each variety 

arranged in 3 replicates in a completely randomised design. 

Measurements: from all trial plants. 


Description: David Hockings, Maleny, QLD. 

Table 30 Syzygium varieties 

‘Elegance’ *‘Aussie 

Boomer’ A 

____________________________________________________ 

PLANT HEIGHT (mm) 

mean 327.33 392.33 


LSD/sig 21.16 P≤0.01 

____________________________________________________ 

LEAF LENGTH (mm) 3rd fully mature leaf from the apex 

mean 52.30 57.40 


LSD/sig 3.07 P≤0.01 

____________________________________________________ 

LEAF WIDTH (mm) 3rd fully mature leaf from the apex 

mean 17.63 22.33 


LSD/sig 1.24 P≤0.01 

____________________________________________________ 


immature 200B 175C 

partially mature 146A 144A 

mature 147A 137A 

____________________________________________________ 

PETIOLE LENGTH (mm) 3rd fully mature leaf from the apex 

mean 3.43 3.93 


LSD/sig 0.31 P≤0.01 

____________________________________________________ 

STAMEN LENGTH (mm) 

mean 15.07 13.93 


LSD/sig 0.58 P≤0.01 

____________________________________________________ 

MANDEVILLA 

Mandevilla sanderi (syn Dipladenia sanderi) 

‘Guinevere’ 


Applicant: Hans. G. Storm, Svendborg, Denmark. 


Characteristics (Table 31, Figure 10) Flower: diameter 

mean 8.27cm, no seams in corolla, colour upperside at 

anthesis deep pink (57C), underside main colour deep pink 

(57D), stripe deeper pink (57B), white stripe between the 

two. Flower bud: colour deep pink (57B), length mean 

8.24cm, length unfused portion mean 3.09cm. (Note: all 

RHS colour chart numbers refer to 1966 edition) 

Origin and Breeding Spontaneous Mutation: originated as 

a spontaneous somatic mutation on Mandevilla (syn 

Dipladenia) sanderi ‘Rosea’ growing in applicant’s 

property at Svendborg, Denmark. The parent variety was 

characterised by deep red flowers and the sport was 

distinguished by bright lolly pink blooms. It was selected 

asexually through several generations to ensure uniformity 

and stability of the distinctive characteristics. Selection 

criteria: flower colour. Propagation: ‘Guinevere’ will be 

commercially propagated by vegetative cuttings. Breeder: 

Hans G. Storm, Svendborg, Denmark. 

Choice of Comparators ‘Pale Face’ A , ‘Wilma’s 

Choice’, ‘Rosea’, ‘Scarlet Pimpernel’ A , ‘Cinderella’ A 

and ‘Merlin’s Magic’ A were initially considered for the 

47


comparative trial as these are similar varieties of common 

knowledge. ‘Pale Face’ A and ‘Wilma’s Choice’ were 

chosen because they have a similar pale pink flower colour 

to ‘Guinevere’. ‘Rosea’ was included because it is the 

parental variety from which the candidate was originated. 

‘Scarlet Pimpernel’ A and ‘Merlin’s Magic’ A have reddish 

coloured flowers and were therefore excluded, as was 

‘Cinderella’ A , which has variegated leaves. 

Comparative Trial Comparators: ‘Pale Face’ A , ‘Wilma’s 

Choice’ and ‘Rosea’. Location: Redlands Nursery Pty 

Ltd, Redland Bay, QLD Jan to Oct 1999. Conditions: 

vegetatively propagated in Jan 1999 and potted to 140mm 

pots in May 1999 using a sawdust based mix with 

controlled release fertilizer, placed in full sun and protected 

by hail cloth. Standard nursery irrigation and pest and 

disease practices were carried out; no growth treatments 

were applied. Trial design: completely randomised block 

design containing 20 replicates of each variety. 

Measurements: vegetative observations taken from 10 

randomly selected plants and floral characteristics recorded 

on 10 randomly selected flowers at anthesis. 


First sold in Denmark in 1995. First Australian sale nil. 

Description: Dr KV Bunker, Redlands Nursery Pty Ltd, Redland Bay, 

QLD. 

Table 31 Mandevilla (syn Dipladenia) varieties 

‘Guinevere’ *‘Pale *‘Wilma’s *Rosea 

Face’ A Choice’ 

____________________________________________________ 

FLOWER: COLOUR UPPERSIDE AT ANTHESIS (RHS, 1966) 

57C 63C 68B 57A 

deep pink light pink medium red purple 

pink 

____________________________________________________ 

FLOWER: COLOUR UNDERSIDE AT ANTHESIS 

(RHS, 1966) 

main colour 57D 63C 68B 57C 

deep pink light pink medium deep pink 

pink 

stripe 57B 63B 57C 53C 

deep pink light pink deep pink red 

____________________________________________________ 

FLOWER BUD: COLOUR (RHS, 1966) 

57B 63B 57C 53C 

deep pink light pink deep pink red 

____________________________________________________ 

PEAR 

Pyrus communis 

‘Corinella’ 


Applicant: R. Anastasio, Lancaster, VIC. 

Characteristics (Table 32, Figure 29) Plant: habit erect, 

vigour strong. One year old shoots: colour brown, lenticels 

few, shoot internode length medium (average 32.11mm). 

Leaf: length medium (average 66.6mm), width broad 

(average 41.9mm), margin indentation serrate, shape of 

upper blade acute, shape of base flat, curvature of midrib 

strong, glands absent. Petiole: length short, (average 

23.2mm), stipules absent. Fruit: size large, length long 

(average 85.6mm), width broad (average 79.8mm), shape 

concave pyriform, russet very slight, stalk length medium 

(average 20.7mm), curvature of stalk weak, fruit ground 

colour at harvest maturity RHS 145A, overcolour absent, 

margin of eye basin ribbed, eye basin depth medium 

(average 11.3mm), eye basin width medium (average 

29.9mm). Seeds: shape ovate. Season of maturity: late 

season (Apr 1st, Lancaster, Victoria). 

Origin and Breeding Spontaneous mutation: from one 

branch from grafts of ‘Paradise’, made onto D9 stock at 

applicant’s property in Lancaster, VIC in 1990. The mutated 

branch was noted to be different in habit and form and to 

produce fruit unlike the parent. Grafts were taken in 1994, 

from which ‘Corinella’ has been selected. Fruit from 

‘Corinella’ are characterised by large size, green skin colour 

and pronounced crowns at the base, where as ‘Paradise’ has 

very small fruit size and green/yellow skin colour. Selection 

criteria: large green skinned fruit. Propagation: vegetative 

by budwood. ‘Corinella’ will be commercially propagated 

by vegetative cuttings from the stock plants. Breeder: R. 

Anastasio, Lancaster, VIC. 

Choice of Comparators ‘Paradise’ was chosen as a 

comparator because it is the original source material from 

which the candidate variety was selected. ‘Packham 

Triumph’ was selected since it is the most similar variety of 

common knowledge in terms of similar fruit characteristics 

and maturity time. No other similar varieties of common 

knowledge have been identified 

Comparative Trial Comparators: ‘Paradise’, ‘Packham 

Triumph’. Location: Lancaster, VIC, 1995/98. Conditions: 

trees 4 years old grafted onto Pyrus calleryana (D6) planted 

in large blocks and maintained under normal commercial 

practice. Trees planted on 6 metre spacings as free standing 

specimens. Pest and disease treatments applied as required. 

Trial design: large un-randomised block of commercial 

planting. Measurements: taken from 12 trees with 80 

measurements per variety. 


A prior application was made in Australia in 1995, which 

was subsequently withdrawn. (Application number 

95/202). First Australian sale nil. 

Description: Leslie Mitchell, Agrisearch Services Pty Ltd, Shepparton, 

VIC. 

Table 32 Pyrus varieties 

‘Corinella’ *‘Packham *‘Paradise’ 

Triumph’ 

____________________________________________________ 

ONE YEAR OLD SHOOT INTERNODE LENGTH (mm) 

Mid season 

mean 32.11 32.18 40.56 


LSD/sig 3.07 ns P≤0.01 

____________________________________________________ 

WATER SHOOT COLOUR 

brown brown light brown 

____________________________________________________ 

48



SHAPE OF VEGETATIVE BUD 

medium squat squat 

____________________________________________________ 

LEAF BLADE ATTITUDE TO STEM 

horizontal slightly upwards 

upwards 

____________________________________________________ 

LEAF BLADE LENGTH (mm) Mid season 

mean 66.61 72.32 51.55 


LSD/sig 4.69 P≤0.01 P≤0.01 

____________________________________________________ 

LEAF BLADE BREADTH (mm) Mid season 

mean 41.95 37.76 40.88 


LSD/sig 2.86 P≤0.01 ns 

____________________________________________________ 

LEAF BLADE LENGTH/BREADTH RATIO, Mid season 

mean 1.61 1.95 1.28 


LSD/sig 0.15 P≤0.01 P≤0.01 

____________________________________________________ 

LEAF BLADE SHAPE OF UPPER BLADE 

acute acute obtuse 

____________________________________________________ 

LEAF BLADE SHAPE OF LEAF BASE 

flat flat obtuse 

____________________________________________________ 

CURVATURE OF MIDRIB: 

strong strong weak 

____________________________________________________ 

LEAF STIPULE 

absent present absent 

____________________________________________________ 

PETIOLE LENGTH (mm), Mid season: 

mean 23.15 32.53 33.45 


LSD/sig 2.19 P≤0.01 P≤0.01 

____________________________________________________ 

FRUIT LENGTH (mm) at maturity 

mean 85.51 83.63 40.43 


LSD/sig 3.15 ns P≤0.01 

____________________________________________________ 

FRUIT BREADTH (mm) at maturity 

mean 79.75 75.16 33.45 


LSD/sig 2.03 P≤0.01 P≤0.01 

____________________________________________________ 

FRUIT LENGTH/BREADTH RATIO at maturity 

mean 1.07 1.17 0.96 


LSD/sig 0.06 P≤0.01 P≤0.01 

____________________________________________________ 

FRUIT GROUND COLOUR (Harvest maturity) 

145A 145A 145A 

____________________________________________________ 

FRUIT OVERCOLOUR (Harvest maturity) 

145A 145A 34B 

____________________________________________________ 

FRUIT RUSSET (Harvest maturity) 

slight/absent medium slight/absent 

____________________________________________________ 

FRUIT STEM LENGTH (mm), (Harvest maturity) 

mean 20.67 31.81 11.16 


LSD/sig 2.73 P≤0.01 P≤0.01 

____________________________________________________ 

FRUIT STEM THICKNESS (mm), (Harvest maturity) 

mean 4.49 4.35 4.13 


LSD/sig 0.29 ns P≤0.01 

____________________________________________________ 

FRUIT CURVATURE OF STALK, (Harvest maturity) 

weak medium absent 

____________________________________________________ 

FRUIT MARGIN OF EYE BASIN, (Harvest maturity) 

ribbed 

very slightly even 

ribbed 

____________________________________________________ 

FRUIT EYE BASIN DEPTH (mm), (Harvest maturity) 

mean 11.25 11.95 2.91 


LSD/sig 1.09 ns P≤0.01 

____________________________________________________ 

FRUIT EYE BASIN WIDTH (mm), (Harvest maturity) 

mean 29.91 30.9 16.71 


LSD/sig 2.14 ns P≤0.01 

____________________________________________________ 

SHAPE OF SEEDS, (Harvest maturity) 

ovate ovate even 

____________________________________________________ 

SEASON OF MATURITY, Harvest Date (Lancaster, VIC) 

Feb 3rd Feb 25th Apr 1st 

____________________________________________________ 

POTATO 


‘FL 1867’ 


Applicant: Frito-Lay Co, Rhinelander, Wisconsin, USA. 

Agent: The Smith’s Snackfood Co Ltd, Rydalmere, NSW. 

Characteristics (Table 33, Figure 48) Plant: stem-type, 

habit erect, height medium, early-mid season maturing. 

Stem: anthocyanin absent, medium thickness, straight 

single wings of medium prominence, no swelling at nodes. 

Leaf: colour mid green, silhouette open, lower surface 

glabrous. Leaflet: size medium, shape narrowly-ovate with 

acute tip (terminal leaflet), waviness of margin weak, depth 

of veins medium, anthocyanin of blade in apical rosette 

absent, medium glossiness of upperside, frequency of 

secondary leaflets medium on terminal leaflet and low on 

lateral leaflets, size of secondary leaflets on laterals small. 

Petioles: anthocyanin absent. Inflorescence: size large, 

frequency of flowers high, bud persistence high, 

anthocyanin colouration of bud absent-very weak, 

anthocyanin colouration of peduncle absent. Flower corolla: 

size large, colour of inner side predominantly white (RHS 

155C, 1995), some white-very pale red-violet. Anthocyanin 

colouration on outer side absent, anthocyanin colouration of 

inner side of coloured flower very weak. Fruit: frequency 

medium. Tuber: oval, shallow depth of eyes, skin smooth, 

colour light-brown to brown, eyebrows not prominent, flesh 

colour white, no anthocyanin colouration of skin in reaction 

to light. Lightsprout: size large, shape conical, weak redviolet 

anthocyanin colouration of base, pubescence of base 

weak, tip size medium, habit of tip closed, anthocyanin at 

tip absent-weak, medium pubescence of tip, number of root 

tips medium, protrusion of lenticels medium, short lateral 

shoots. Resistance: resistant to golden nematode. Specific 

gravity high. 

49



‘Atlantic’ x pollen parent ‘FL 162’. ‘Atlantic’ is a widely 

used crisping variety and was chosen as a parent because of 

its characteristically high dry matter content, good yield, 

good processing quality and resistance to potato cyst 

nematode. The pollen parent was developed by Frito-Lay 

Co in USA. It is heat tolerant, Verticillium wilt resistant, has 

high solids content and is of high processing quality when 

fresh and after storage. Hybridisation took place in 

Wisconsin, USA in 1989. A tuber from each of the resultant 

botanical seeds was field-planted in 1990. Field selections 

were based on tuber size, number, shape, absence of 

external defects. Further field selections were evaluated for 

internal defects. RD 7-90-20 was selected in 1991. Analysis 

of solids content and crisping quality resulted in RD 7-90- 

20’s further selection and redesignation as ‘FL 1867’. It was 

entered into large-scale national trials in 1994, in areas of 

fresh potato production. ‘FL 1867’ has similar processing 

characteristics to ‘Atlantic’ but plant height, flower colour 

and stem anthocyanin are distinguishing features. 

Propagation: tissue culture of pathogen-free tissue, minituber 

and tuber production through eight generations 

confirmed the progeny were stable. Breeder: Drs. Martin 

Cipar and Robert W Hoopes, Frito-Lay Co., Rhinelander, 

Wisconsin, USA. 

Choice of Comparators ‘Atlantic’ was chosen as the most 

appropriate comparator for ‘FL 1867’ since it is the seed 

parent and is the most commonly used crisping variety in 

Australia. ‘Smith’s Astra’ A has similar lightsprout 

characteristics to ‘FL 1867’, but is clearly distinguishable 

from FL 1867 by tuber skin texture. 

Comparative Trial The candidate description is based on 

the official South African UPOV description of the variety. 

This report is identified as UPOV: TG/23/5: 86-11-21. The 

testing period was during 1997. The Applicant’s ‘Potato 

Objective Description’ report derived from comparative 

field trials in Canada and USA, was also consulted. This 

report is identified by its Canadian registration number I- 

257, and date July 20, 1999. The characteristics of ‘Smith’s 

Astra’ A are as published in 1999 PVJ 12(1) 48 and derived 

from an Australian comparative trial. The 1999 Australian 

lightsprout comparative trial was established at Scholefield 

Robinson Horticultural Services Pty Ltd, Netherby, SA. 

The essential differences between ‘FL 1867’ and the 

comparator, ‘Atlantic’, are given in the comparative table. 

Australian lightsprout data are given in parentheses. 



South Africa 1997 Granted ‘FL 1867’ 

First sold in USA in June 1998. First Australian sale nil. 

Description: Prue McMichael, Scholefield Robinson Horticultural 

Services Pty Ltd, Netherby, SA. 

Table 33 Solanum varieties 

‘FL 1867’ *‘Atlantic’ *‘Smith’s 

Astra’ A 

____________________________________________________ 

LIGHTSPROUT 

size large small 

(small- (medium) 

medium) 

shape conical broad spherical 

cylindrical 

(ovoid) (ovoid) 

anthocyanin colouration of base 

red-violet blue-violet red-violet 

(red-violet) (blue-violet) 

intensity of anthocyanin colouration of base 

absent-weak medium weak 

(weak) (medium) 

pubescence of base 

weak strong very weak 

(weak) (medium) 

size of tip medium medium 

(medium- (medium) 

large) 

habit of tip closed closed closed 

(medium) (medium) 

intensity of anthocyanin colouration of tip 

weak absent weak 

(absent) (absent) 

pubescence of tip 

medium weak very weak 

(weak- (medium) 

medium) 

number of root tips 

medium few 

(medium) (medium) 

protrusion of lenticels 

medium strong weak 

(medium) (medium-) 

strong 

length of lateral shoots 

short medium weak 

(short) (short) 

____________________________________________________ 

PLANT 

height medium tall n/a 

type stem-type intermediate n/a 

growth habit spreading semi-erect n/a 

time of maturity early-mid mid season medium-late 

season 

____________________________________________________ 

STEM 

thickness of main stem 

medium medium n/a 

extension of anthocyanin colouration 

absent medium absent 

____________________________________________________ 

LEAF 

size large n/a medium 

silhouette open medium open 

colour medium-green olive-green dark-green 

intensity of green colour 

medium medium dark 

extension of anthocyanin colouration in midrib 

weak n/a absent 

lower surface pubescence 

glabrous pubescent n/a 

____________________________________________________ 

50



LEAFLET 

size medium medium medium 

frequency of coalescence 

low n/a n/a 

waviness of margin 

weak weak medium 

depth of veins medium n/a n/a 

anthocyanin of blade at apical rosette 

absent n/a absent 

glossiness of upperside 

medium medium-dull medium 

frequency of secondary leaflets (on terminal leaflet) 

medium n/a n/a 

frequency of secondary leaflets (on lateral leaflet) 

low n/a low 

size of secondary leaflets on laterals 

small n/a large 

____________________________________________________ 

INFLORESCENCE 

size large n/a n/a 

anthocyanin colouration of peduncle 

absent absent absent 

frequency of flowers 

high medium medium-high 

anthocyanin colouration of bud 

absent- medium absent 

very weak 

____________________________________________________ 

FLOWER COROLLA 

size medium small n/a 

colour of inner side 

white purple-violet white 

(RHS 155C) (RHS 82D) 

intensity of anthocyanin colouration of inner side in coloured 

flower 

very weak medium n/a 

anthocyanin colouration of outer side in white flower 

absent n/a absent 

____________________________________________________ 

FRUIT 

frequency of fruits 

medium medium few 

____________________________________________________ 

TUBER 

shape round oval round 

(round-oval) (round) n/a 

depth of eyes shallow intermediate n/a 

smoothness of skin 

smooth netted-russet flaky 

colour of skin yellow brown russet 

(light-brown) 

colour of base of eyes 

yellow n/a n/a 

colour of flesh white white white 

(white) (white) 

anthocyanin colouration of skin in reaction to light 

absent n/a n/a 

____________________________________________________ 

*Note: Characteristics of ‘FL 1867’ are derived from the official (UPOV) 

South African description. The characteristics of ‘Atlantic’ are based on 

those described from Canadian comparative field trials (that included FL 

1867). The characteristics of ‘Smith’s Astra’ A are derived from an 

Australian comparative trial report [PVJ 12 (1)48]. The data in parentheses 

are from the Australian comparative lightsprout trial and observation of 

Australian-grown tubers. 

PUMPKIN 

Cucurbita maxima 

‘Dulong QHI’ 


Applicant: The State of Queensland through its 

Department of Primary Industries, Brisbane, QLD. 

Characteristics (Table 34, Figure 49) Plant: growth habit 

trailing. Stem: colour green, mostly dark green (RHS 133A) 

with lighter green (RHS 146C) striped. Leaf Blade: size 

medium, intensity of green colour upper side medium (RHS 

146A). Petiole: length medium, thickness at base medium. 

Female flower: length of sepal medium, sepals tend to be 

petalous, intensity of orange colour of pistil at opening 

medium (RHS 12A). Male flower: length of pedicel 

medium, diameter of pedicel medium, intensity of green 

colour of pedicel light, hairiness of pedicel weak, length of 

sepal medium. Fruit: main colour of pedicel green 

otherwise corky, size medium, length medium, diameter 

medium, shape in longitudinal cross section transverse 

elliptic, shape of stalk-end depressed, shape of apical 

(blossom end) depressed to flat, grooves present and 

slightly to moderately deep with medium distance between 

grooves, number of colours on skin one or two, main colour 

of skin grey (RHS 198A), intensity of main colour light to 

medium, secondary colour of skin grey (198B) distribution 

of secondary colour marbled, texture of surface smooth, 

warts absent, medium thickness of flesh, main colour of 

flesh orange (RHS 21A), intensity of main colour of flesh 

medium. Seed: size medium, shape elliptic, seed surface 

smooth, seed colour brownish (164C), colour of margins 

yellowish white (9D) weight of 1000 seeds medium (174g). 

(Note: all RHS colour chart numbers refer to 1995 edition). 

Origin and Breeding Controlled and open pollination 

followed by selection at each stage: C. maxima ‘Queensland 

Blue’ (Selected Strain) was crossed with C. ecuadorensis 

followed by three backcrosses to ‘Selected’, ‘Large’(Yates 

Seed Co), and ‘Wallworks’ strains of ‘Queensland Blue’, 

followed by 2 generations of self-pollination and 2 

generations of open-pollination, selected separate plants 

crossed to ‘Jarrahdale’ (Yates) and to ‘W19’ [a selection of 

parentage similar to above] and the resultant progeny were 

intercrossed, followed by a generation of self-pollination, 

intercrossed resultant selections, then 1 generation of selfpollination, 

out-crossed to ‘Jarrahdale’ (New World), then 7 

generations of open pollination (in which initial population 

included the population of the above crossed with 

‘Jarrahdale’ (SPS), followed by two generations of selfpollination 

then one generation of open-pollination as 

combined lines 3214 and 3218. From these lines, through 

open pollination a uniform stable line known as 3287 was 

selected to become ‘Dulong QHI’. The original seed parent 

and all commercial parents in the ancestry were 

characterised by susceptibility to papaya ringspot virus type 

w and to zucchini yellow mosaic virus and the original 

pollen parent was characterised by weedy vine growth and 

white fleshed fruit. Trials conducted at Redlands, Maroochy 

and Bowen Research Stations of Queensland Department of 

Primary Industries. Selection criteria: resistance to 

potyviruses (papaya ringspot virus type w, zucchini yellow 

mosaic virus, watermelon mosaic virus), yield, grey skinned 

fruit, and good flesh and consumer characteristics. 

51


Propagation: by seed. Breeder: M. Herrington 1 , R. Wright 2 , 

S. Prytz 1 and D. Persley 3 , Queensland Horticulture Institute, 

Nambour 1 , Bowen 2 , Indooroopilly 3 , Queensland 

Department of Primary Industries, QLD, Australia. 

Choice of Comparators ‘Jarrahdale’, ‘Queensland Blue’, 

‘Eudlo QHI’ and ‘Redlands Trailblazer’ were initially 

considered for the comparative trial as these are similar 

varieties of common knowledge. ‘Queensland Blue’ is an 

older available commercial variety and one of the early 

parents, however it is highly susceptible to viruses and has 

dark skin. Therefore it was excluded from the trial. ‘Eudlo 

QHI’ was chosen because of its similar pedigree, its high 

virus resistance and moderately similar fruit type, however 

it has variable seed colour and a low tendency to produce 

petalous sepals on female flowers. ‘Redlands Trailblazer’ 

was chosen for its high virus resistance, but has white seed. 

The ancestral parent C. ecuadorensis was not considered for 

the trial because C. ecuadorensis has a commercially 

unacceptable weedy plant growth habit, creamy flowers, 

and white fleshed fruit, which clearly distinguish it from 

‘Dulong QHI’. Although virus susceptible the most recently 

used parent ‘Jarrahdale’ (SPS) was included as a parent in 

the comparative trial. 

Comparative Trial Comparators: ‘Jarrahdale’, ‘Eudlo 

QHI’ and ‘Redlands Trailblazer’. Location: Maroochy 

Research Station, Nambour, QLD (latitude 26º37´. South, 

longitude 152º57´ east, elevation 29m), Mar to Aug 1999. 

Conditions: trial conducted in field, sown in cells then 

transplanted to field, overhead irrigated, nutrition 

maintained with fertiliser applications based on soil test, 

pest and disease treatments applied as required. Spacings 

5m between rows, 2 m between plants within rows. Trial 

design: randomised complete block design with 5 blocks 

and 4 plants per plot, with an additional plant of ‘Dulong 

QHI’ in each block. Measurements: plants or external 

characteristics of fruit mostly from twenty individual plants, 

internal fruit characteristics from mature fruit of ten plants 

per cultivar. One sample per plant except 2 per plant 

(flower) for length of sepals. 


Description: M. E. Herrington, Maroochy Research Station, Nambour 

QLD. 

Table 34 Cucurbita varieties 

‘Dulong’ *‘Eudlo *‘Redlands*‘Jarrahdale’ 

QHI’ QHI’ Trailblazer’ 

____________________________________________________ 

STEM: COLOUR 

green, dark green, dark green, dark green, 

(133A) (133A) (133A) 

with lighter with lighter with lighter uniform 

(146C) (137B) (146C) (146A) 

stripes stripes stripes 

____________________________________________________ 

LEAF BLADE: WIDTH (mm) 

mean 307 283 244 277 

std deviation 21.97 17.50 19.95 19.26 

LSD/sig 25.4 ns P≤0.01 P≤0.01 

____________________________________________________ 

LEAF BLADE: LENGTH (mm) 

mean 197 183 167 186 

std deviation 24.20 25.03 28.38 30.30 

LSD/sig 19.7 ns P≤0.01 ns 

____________________________________________________ 

LEAF BLADE: LENGTH/WIDTH RATIO 

mean 0.640 0.649 0.682 0.673 

std deviation 0.032 0.032 0.036 0.029 

LSD/sig 0.028 ns P≤0.01 P≤0.01 

____________________________________________________ 

PETIOLE: THICKNESS(at base, mm) 

mean 14.9 13.0 12.4 13.7 

std deviation 1.59 1.36 1.81 1.66 

LSD/sig 1.5 P≤0.01 P≤0.01 ns 

____________________________________________________ 

FEMALE FLOWER: LENGTH OF SEPAL (mm) 


std deviation 3.85 1.95 1.37 4.52 

LSD/sig 5.3 ns P≤0.01 P≤0.01 

____________________________________________________ 

FEMALE FLOWER: LENGTH OF PEDICEL (mm) 

mean 25 21 15 27 


LSD/sig 8 ns P≤0.01 ns 

____________________________________________________ 

FEMALE FLOWER: PETALOUSNESS OF SEPALS (number of 

plants with flowers) 

petalous 14 0 0 0 

nonpetalous 2 17 4 6 

____________________________________________________ 

MALE FLOWER: LENGTH OF SEPAL (mm) 

mean 19.7 20.2 12.8 24.1 

std deviation 3.55 3.08 2.00 3.08 

LSD/sig 3.0 ns P≤0.01 P≤0.01 

____________________________________________________ 

FRUIT: SIZE (g) 

mean 3249 3507 2071 4644 

std deviation 800 1091 460 1543 

LSD/sig 755 ns P≤0.01 P≤0.01 

____________________________________________________ 

FRUIT: SIZE 

medium medium small medium to 

large 

____________________________________________________ 

FRUIT: LENGTH (mm) 

mean 120 142 134 148 

std deviation 9.5 21.2 13.1 19.6 

LSD/sig 17 P≤0.01 ns P≤0.01 

____________________________________________________ 

52



FRUIT : DIAMETER (mm) 

mean 226 224 175 239 

std deviation 18.0 19.2 14.7 27.8 

LSD/sig 21 ns P≤0.01 ns 

____________________________________________________ 

FRUIT : LENGTH/DIAMETER RATIO 

mean 0.536 0.637 0.762 0.624 

std deviation 0.042 0.097 0.061 0.072 

LSD/sig 0.064 P≤0.01 P≤0.01 P≤0.01 

____________________________________________________ 

FRUIT: SHAPE IN LONGITUDINAL CROSS SECTION 

transverse transverse circular transverse 

elliptic elliptic elliptic elliptic 

____________________________________________________ 

FRUIT: SHAPE OF STALK END 

depressed depressed flat depressed to 

flat 

____________________________________________________ 

FRUIT: SHAPE OF APICAL (blossom) END 

depressed depressed flat depressed 

to flat to flat 

____________________________________________________ 

FRUIT: GROOVES 

slight to slight to very slight moderate 

moderate moderate grooves 

grooves grooves 

____________________________________________________ 

FRUIT DISTANCE BETWEEN GROOVES (mm) 

mean 70 73 56 72 

std deviation 10.4 9.5 8.4 13.0 


____________________________________________________ 

FRUIT: NUMBER OF COLOURS OF SKIN 

one to two one to two one one to two 

____________________________________________________ 

FRUIT: MAIN COLOUR OF SKIN 

grey (198A) grey (198A)grey (198A)grey (198B) 

uniform 

____________________________________________________ 

FRUIT: INTENSITY OF MAIN COLOUR OF SKIN 

light to light to medium medium 

medium medium to light to light 

____________________________________________________ 

FRUIT: SECONDARY COLOUR OF SKIN 

grey (198B) grey (198C) grey (198A)grey (198C) 

uniform 

____________________________________________________ 

FRUIT: THICKNESS OF FLESH (mm) 

mean 50 47 31 51 

std deviation 6.7 6.4 3.2 10.8 

LDS/sig 9 ns P≤0.01 ns 

____________________________________________________ 

FRUIT: MAIN COLOUR OF FLESH 

orange variable, orange orange 

(21A) yellow (21A) (21A) 

2/10, 

orange 

(21A) 7/10, 

and cream 

(8C)1/10 

____________________________________________________ 

FRUIT: INTENSITY OF MAIN COLOUR OF FLESH 

medium medium, medium medium to 

variable 

dark 

____________________________________________________ 

SEED: WIDTH (mm) 

mean 9.6 10.3 10.8 9.8 

std deviation 0.39 1.09 0.49 0.60 


____________________________________________________ 

SEED: LENGTH/WIDTH RATIO 

mean 1.57 1.55 1.33 1.61 

std deviation 0.056 0.114 0.083 0.104 


____________________________________________________ 

SEED: COLOUR (RHS, 1995) 

brownish mixed, whitish yellowish 

(164 C) 28% (155D) brownish 

whitish 

(165D) 

(155D) 

and 72% 

yellowish 

brownish 

(165D) 

____________________________________________________ 

SEED: COLOUR OF MARGIN) (RHS 1995) 

whitish to whitish to whitish whitish to 

yellowish yellowish (155D) yellowish 

(9D) (10D) (11C) 

____________________________________________________ 

SEED: WEIGHT OF 1000 DRY SEEDS (g) 

mean 174 206 169 227 

std deviation 38.47 40.43 15.86 43.29 

LSD/sig 55.7 ns ns P≤0.01 

____________________________________________________ 

ROSE 

Rosa 

‘Baby Jack’ 


Applicant: Kay-D-Tee, Silvan, VIC. 

Characteristics (Table 35, Figure 1) Plant: habit miniature 

bushy, height medium, width narrow. Stem: anthocyanin 

strong, colouration reddish brown. Prickles: present, lower 

surface deeply concave, small thorn density absent, large 

thorn density medium. Leaf: size medium, colour at first 

flowering medium green, upper surface glossiness weak, 

cross section flat, margin undulation medium. Terminal 

leaflet: length medium (30mm-47mm), width medium 

(17mm-26mm), base shape rounded. Flowering shoot: 

number of flowers many. Flower pedicel: number of hairs 

many. Bud: shape of longitudinal section just before petal 

separation ovate. Flower: type double, number of petals 

medium (25-35), diameter medium (51mm-66mm), view 

from top irregularly round, profile; upper flat, lower 

flattened convex, fragrance medium. Sepal: extensions 

weak. Petals: size medium, inside surface colour; middle 

zone RHS 157B, marginal zone RHS 65D, basal spot 

absent, outer surface colour; middle zone RHS 157B, 

marginal zone RHS 157B, basal spot absent, reflex at 

margin weak, margin undulation medium. Stamen filament: 

colouration orange. Seed vessel: size at petal fall medium. 

Hip: pitcher shaped. Time of flowering: medium (early 

November). Flowering habit: almost continuous. (Note: all 

RHS colour chart number refers to 1995 edition.) 


‘Benfig’ A . The parent is characterised by its porcelain pink 

flowers, upright habit, and prolific flowering. Selection of 

the sport took place in Silvan, VIC in 1995 on the basis of 

53


unique flower colour. Selection criteria: uniqueness of 

colour, cut flower potential, pot and garden use, 

development on own roots. Propagation: a number of 

cuttings were taken from the mutated stem to build up stock 

plants, several further generations were propagated and 

were found to be uniform and stable. ‘Baby Jack’ will be 

commercially propagated by vegetative cuttings from the 

stock plants. Breeder: Janene Neil, Silvan, VIC. 

Choice of Comparators ‘Benfig’ A and ‘Benjen’ were 

considered as the similar varieties of common knowledge. 

‘Benfig’ A was also considered because it was the parent. 

The variety ‘Benjen’ has similar bush shape and flower 

colour. 

Comparative Trial Comparator: ‘Benfig’ A and ‘Benjen’. 

Location: Silvan, VIC, Nov 1998-Nov 1999. Conditions: trial 

conducted in an unheated polyhouse, plants propagated from 

cutting, rooted cuttings planted into 250mm pots filed with 

scoria as part of a hydroponic system, pest and disease 

treatments applied as required. Trial design: twenty pots of 

four plants per pot for each variety arranged in separate single 

rows. Measurements: from ten plants per variety at random. 


First sold in Australia in Sep 1997. No prior overseas sales. 

Description: Christopher Prescott, Prescott Roses Pty Ltd, Clyde, VIC. 

Table 35 Rosa varieties 

‘Baby Jack’ *‘Benfig’ A *‘Benjen’ 

____________________________________________________ 

YOUNG SHOOT ANTHOCYANIN (1 = absent, 9 = very strong) 


____________________________________________________ 

YOUNG SHOOT (hue of anthocyanin colour) 

bronze to bronze to reddish-brown 

reddish-brown reddish-brown 

____________________________________________________ 

TERMINAL LEAFLET (shape of base) 

rounded obtuse rounded 

____________________________________________________ 

FLOWER PEDICLE (number of hairs) 

many many medium 

____________________________________________________ 

NUMBER OF PETALS 

mean 30 26.6 24.2 


LSD/sig 3.80 ns P≤0.01 

____________________________________________________ 

FLOWER DIAMETER (mm) 

mean 58.70 63.80 70.40 


LSD/sig 6.78 ns P≤0.01 

____________________________________________________ 

FLOWER (side view of upper part) 

flat flattened flat 

convex 

____________________________________________________ 

FLOWER (side view of lower part) 

convex flat flat 

____________________________________________________ 

FLOWER FRAGRANCE 

medium medium strong 

____________________________________________________ 

SEPAL EXTENSIONS 


____________________________________________________ 

COLOUR OF MIDDLE SECTION INNERSIDE OF PETAL 

(RHS, 1995) 

RHS 157B RHS 65C RHS 69B 

____________________________________________________ 

COLOUR OF MARGINAL SECTION INNERSIDE OF 

PETAL (RHS, 1995) 

RHS 65D RHS 65A RHS 69B 

____________________________________________________ 

BASAL SPOT INNERSIDE 

absent present present 

____________________________________________________ 

PETAL: SIZE OF BASAL SPOT INNERSIDE OF PETAL 

absent large very large 

____________________________________________________ 

COLOUR OF BASAL SPOT INNERSIDE OF PETAL (RHS, 

1995) 

absent 157A 157B 

____________________________________________________ 

COLOUR OF MIDDLE SECTION OUTERSIDE OF PETAL 

(RHS, 1995) 

157B 155C 155C 

____________________________________________________ 

COLOUR OF MARGINAL SECTION OUTERSIDE OF PETAL 

(RHS, 1995) 

157B 65D 155C 

____________________________________________________ 

PETAL: REFLEX OF MARGIN 

weak strong strong 

____________________________________________________ 

PETAL: UNDULATION OF MARGIN 

medium weak absent 

____________________________________________________ 

SEED VESSEL SIZE (at petal fall) 

medium medium small 

____________________________________________________ 

‘Benmable’ syn Benardella’s Waltz 


Applicant: Harlane Rose Specialists, Englishtown, New 

Jersy, USA. 

Agent: Kay L Neil, Kay-D-Tee, Silvan, VIC. 


bushy, height medium, width medium. Stem: anthocyanin 

strong, colouration reddish brown. Prickles: present, lower 

surface deeply concave, small thorn density absent, large 

thorn density few. Leaf: size medium, colour at first 

flowering dark green, upper surface glossiness medium, 

cross section flat, margin undulation medium. Terminal 

leaflet: length medium (38mm-67mm), width medium 

(20mm-33mm), base shape obtuse. Flowering shoot: 

number of flowers very many. Flower pedicel: stiff hairs 

number medium. Bud: shape of longitudinal section just 

before petal separation broad ovate. Flower: type double, 

number of petals medium (21-25), diameter medium 

(42mm-50mm), view from top irregularly round, profile; 

upper flattened convex, lower flattened convex, flower does 

not tend to open fully, fragrance absent. Sepal: extensions 

weak. Petals: size medium, inside surface colour; middle 

zone RHS 57B, marginal zone RHS 57A, basal spot RHS 

156C, outer surface colour; middle zone RHS 58B, 

marginal zone RHS 58B, basal spot large, basal spot RHS 

54



156D, reflex at margin medium, margin undulation weak. 

Stamen filament: colouration yellow. Seed vessel: size at 

petal fall large. Hip: pitcher shaped. Time of flowering: 

medium (early November). Flowering habit: almost 

continuous. (Note: all RHS colour chart number refers to 

1995 edition.) 


90-9041 x pollen parent ‘Benmagic’ A . The seed parent was 

characterised by its red/cream bi-colour flowers, upright 

habit, and dark green foliage. The pollen parent was 

characterised by its pink/cream bi-colour flowers, glossy 

leaves, and large amounts of flower buds per stem. 

Hybridisation took place in Englishtown, NJ, USA in 1994. 

From this cross, the seedling was chosen on the basis of 

flower colour. Selection criteria: uniqueness of colour, show 

and cut flower potential, pot and garden use, development 

on own roots. Propagation: a number of mature stock plants 

were generated from this seedling through vegetative 

propagation and were found to be uniform and stable. 

‘Benmable’ will be commercially propagated by vegetative 

cuttings from the stock plants. Breeder: Frank A. 

Benardella, Englishtown, NJ, USA. 

Choice of Comparators ‘Benmagic’ A was considered as 

the most similar variety of common knowledge on the basis 

of flower colour, bud size and shape. ‘Benmagic’ A was also 

the pollen parent. Seed parent (90-9041) was not considered 

because it differs from the candidate in characteristics stated 

above. Of the Benardella range of varieties the 

characteristics of ‘Benmagic’ A most closely resembles to 

the candidate. 

Comparative Trial Comparator: ‘Benmagic’ A . Location: 

Silvan, VIC, Nov 1998-Nov 1999. Conditions: trial 

conducted in an unheated polyhouse, plants propagated 

from cutting, rooted cuttings planted into 250mm pots filed 

with scoria as part of a hydroponic system, pest and disease 


four plants per pot for each variety arranged in separate 

single rows. Measurements: from ten plants per variety at 

random. 





‘Benmable’ *‘Benmagic’ A 

____________________________________________________ 

LEAF WIDTH (mm) – terminal leaflet 

mean 26 31 


LSD/sig 3.26 P≤0.01 

____________________________________________________ 

LEAF LENGTH (mm) – terminal leaflet from base to tip 

mean 49 55 


LSD/sig 5.39 P≤0.01 

____________________________________________________ 

LEAF GREEN COLOUR AT FIRST FLOWERING 

dark 

medium 

____________________________________________________ 

LEAF GLOSSINESS OF UPPERSIDE 

medium 

strong 

____________________________________________________ 


obtuse 

rounded 

____________________________________________________ 


many 

few 

____________________________________________________ 


absent 

very weak 

____________________________________________________ 


absent 

very weak 

____________________________________________________ 


(RHS, 1995) 

57B 

156D 

____________________________________________________ 



57A 

57A 

____________________________________________________ 

BASAL SPOT INNERSIDE 

present 

absent 

____________________________________________________ 


(RHS, 1995) 

58B 

156D 

____________________________________________________ 

COLOUR OF MARGINAL SECTION OUTERSIDE OF 


58A 

57D 

____________________________________________________ 

BASAL SPOT OUTERSIDE 

present 

absent 

____________________________________________________ 

‘Benmjul’ syn Benardella’s Ruby 


Applicant: Harlane Rose Specialists, Englishtown, New 

Jersy, USA. 

Agent: Kay L Neil, Kay-D-Tee, Silvan, VIC. 


bushy, height medium, width narrow. Stem: anthocyanin 

strong, colouration bronze to reddish brown. Prickles: 

present, lower surface deeply concave, small thorn density 

absent, large thorn density medium. Leaf: size medium, 

colour at first flowering medium green, upper surface 

glossiness weak, cross section flat, margin undulation 

medium. Terminal leaflet: length medium (37mm-61mm), 

width medium (21mm-33mm), base shape rounded. 

Flowering shoot: number of flowers medium. Flower 

pedicel: stiff hairs number medium. Bud: shape of 

longitudinal section just before petal separation ovate. 

Flower: type double, number of petals medium (22-30), 

diameter medium (52mm-70mm), view from top irregularly 

round, profile; upper flattened convex, lower flat, fragrance 

medium. Sepal: extensions weak. Petals: size medium, 

inside surface colour; middle zone RHS 57C, marginal zone 

RHS 57A, basal spot size medium, basal spot RHS 155A, 

55


outer surface colour; middle zone RHS 57C, marginal zone 

RHS 57B, basal spot medium, basal spot RHS 155C, reflex 

at margin medium, strong undulation weak. Stamen 

filament: colouration yellow. Seed vessel: size at petal fall 

medium. Hip: pitcher shaped. Time of flowering: medium 

(early November). Flowering habit: almost continuous. 

(Note: all RHS colour chart number refers to 1995 edition.) 

Origin and Breeding Controlled Pollination : seed parent 

‘Benjen’ x pollen parent ‘Benmagic’ A . The seed parent was 

characterised by its pale bluey-pink flowers, upright habit, 

and strong fragrance. The pollen parent was characterised 

by its pink/cream bi-colour flowers, glossy leaves, and large 

amounts of flower buds per stem. Hybridisation took place 

in Englishtown, NJ, USA in 1994. From this cross, the 

seedling was chosen on the basis of flower colour. Selection 

criteria: uniqueness of colour, show and cut flower 

potential, pot and garden use, development on own roots. 

Propagation: a number of mature stock plants were 

generated from this seedling through vegetative propagation 

and were found to be uniform and stable. ‘Benmjul’ will be 


stock plants. Breeder: Frank A. Benardella, Englishtown, 

NJ, USA. 

Choice of Comparators The seed parent ‘Benjen’ was 

chosen because the QP considered the bush characteristics 

were reasonably similar. Another variety within the 

Benardella range named ‘Benblack’ was used. This variety 

was considered due to its similar characteristics, and 

because it is the only other red in the Benardella range. 

‘Meihauzrey’ was also considered, and rejected even though 

the flower colour is similar, all other plant characteristics 

are very different. The pollen parent ‘Benmagic’ A was 

rejected due to the difference in flower colour. 

Comparative Trial Comparators: ‘Benjen’, ‘Benblack’. 

Location: Silvan, VIC, Nov 1998-Nov 1999. Conditions: 

trial conducted in an unheated polyhouse, plants propagated 




four plants per pot for each variety arranged in separate 

single rows. Measurements: from ten plants per variety at 

random. 





‘Benmjul’ *‘Benblack’ *‘Benjen’ 

____________________________________________________ 

YOUNG SHOOT ANTHOCYANIN 


____________________________________________________ 

YOUNG SHOOT (hue of anthocyanin colour) 

bronze to bronze to reddish-brown 

reddish brown reddish brown 

____________________________________________________ 


mean 26.3 31.15 21.65 


LSD/sig 2.87 P≤0.01 P≤0.01 

____________________________________________________ 


mean 44.75 55.1 38.55 


LSD/sig 4.29 P≤0.01 P≤0.01 

____________________________________________________ 

LEAF GREEN COLOUR 

medium dark medium 

____________________________________________________ 

LEAF GLOSSINESS OF UPPERSIDE 

weak strong weak 

____________________________________________________ 

LEAFLET (cross-section) 

flat slightly flat 

concave 

____________________________________________________ 


rounded obtuse rounded 

____________________________________________________ 

FLOWER SHOOT: number of flowers 

medium many many 

____________________________________________________ 


medium many medium 

____________________________________________________ 


mean 26.6 22.4 24.2 


LSD/sig 3.36 P≤0.01 ns 

____________________________________________________ 


mean 60.5 65.4 70.4 


LSD/sig 6.181 ns P≤0.01 

____________________________________________________ 


flattened flattened flat 

convex convex 

____________________________________________________ 


flat flattened flat 

convex 

____________________________________________________ 


medium weak strong 

____________________________________________________ 


weak medium medium 

____________________________________________________ 


(RHS, 1995) 

57C ca. 60A 69B 

____________________________________________________ 



57A ca. 60A 69B 

____________________________________________________ 


medium small very large 

____________________________________________________ 

COLOUR OF BASAL SPOT INNERSIDE OF PETAL (RHS, 

1995) 

155A 156C 157B 

____________________________________________________ 


(RHS, 1995) 

57C ca. 60B 155C 

____________________________________________________ 

56





57B ca. 60B 155C 

____________________________________________________ 

BASAL SPOT OUTERSIDE 

present present absent 

____________________________________________________ 

PETAL: SIZE OF BASAL SPOT OUTERSIDE OF PETAL 

medium small absent 

____________________________________________________ 

COLOUR OF BASAL SPOT OUTERSIDE OF PETAL 

(RHS, 1995) 

155C 157B absent 

____________________________________________________ 

PETAL: REFLEX OF MARGIN 

strong very strong strong 

____________________________________________________ 

PETAL: UNDULATION OF MARGIN 

weak weak absent 

____________________________________________________ 

OUTER STAMEN (predominant colour of filament) 

yellow yellow orange 

____________________________________________________ 


small medium small 

____________________________________________________ 

‘Lavflush’ syn Double Date 

Application No: 98/120 Accepted: 7 Jul 1998. 

Applicant: Springwood Consultants Ltd, Caledon East, 

Ontario, Canada 

Agent: John Oakes, Carrum Downs VIC. 

Characteristics (Table 38, Figure 6) Plant: miniature rose. 

Young shoot: anthocyanin absent. Stem: thorns lower 

profile concave. Leaf: size small, medium green (RHS 

137A), medium glossy. Terminal leaflet: concave cross 

section, no undulation of margin, short length and medium 

width, obtuse shaped base. Flower pedicel: few glandular 

hairs. Flower bud: broad ovate. Flower: clusters from 1-2, 

double, high petal count, small diameter, round view from 

above, flat upper and flattened convex lower profile, 

fragrance absent to weak, sepal extensions medium. Petals: 

very small, inner petal colour RHS 41C, outer petal colour 

RHS 41D, large basal spot RHS 1C inside and RHS 1D 

outside, weak reflexing of margin, undulation of margin 

absent; outer stamen orange/yellow. Seed vessel: absent, 

sterile. Hip: pitcher shaped. Flowering: very early, almost 

continuous flowering. (all RHS colour chart numbers refer 


Origin and Breeding Controlled Pollination: 

‘Breezy’/‘June Laver’ selfed seedling (seed parent) x an 

unnamed seedling (pollen parent) in a planned breeding 

program. The seed parent is a proprietary breeding variety 

developed by the applicant. The pollen parent was 

characterised by orange flower colour. Hybridisation took 

place in applicant’s property in Caledon East, Ontario, 

Canada in 1991. Selection criteria: strong apricot colour 

flowers, compact plant growth, flower number and quick 

repeating of flowering. Propagation: vegetatively through 

many generations to confirm uniformity and stability of the 

selection. Breeder: Keith Laver, Springwood Roses, 

Caledon East, Ontario, Canada. 

Choice of Comparators ‘Lavdoll’ A syn Apricot 

Bouquet A , ‘Dees Bouquet’, ‘Red Bouquet’ and ‘Regal 

Bouquet’ were initially considered as comparators on the 

basis of similar growth habit. Later, ‘Dees 

Bouquet’(orange-red), ‘Red Bouquet’ (dark red) and ‘Regal 

Bouquet’ (dark pink) were excluded because they have 

entirely different flower colour. Finally, ‘Lavdoll’ A syn 

Apricot Bouquet A was considered as the most similar 

variety of common knowledge because of its similarity in 

flower colour. 

Comparative Trials Comparator: ‘Lavdoll’ A syn Apricot 

Bouquet A . Location: Tumbi Umbi, NSW, May-Oct 1999. 

Conditions: plants were grown in 100mm pots in a peatbased 

mix with 4kg/m 3 slow release fertiliser, pots overhead 

watered. Trial design: 15 plants arranged in randomised 

complete blocks. Measurements: from all trial plants. 



Canada 1995 Applied ‘Lavflush’ 

First sold in Canada in Aug 1994. First Australian sale Sep 

1997. 

Description: Greg Lowe, Tumbi Umbi, NSW. 


‘Lavflush’ *‘Lavdoll’ A 

____________________________________________________ 

PRICKLES 

present 

absent 

____________________________________________________ 

TERMINAL LEAFLET LENGTH (mm) 

mean 29.5 22.7 


LSD/sig 3.7 P≤0.01 

____________________________________________________ 

TERMINAL LEAFLET WIDTH (mm) 

mean 19.1 11.8 


LSD/sig 3.7 P≤0.01 

____________________________________________________ 


mean 61.4 29.7 


LSD/sig 15.4 P≤0.01 

____________________________________________________ 

FLOWER VIEW FROM ABOVE 

round 

irregularly round 

____________________________________________________ 

SEPAL LENGTH (mm) 

mean 24.9 20.8 


LSD/sig 2.7 P≤0.01 

____________________________________________________ 

PETAL COLOUR (RHS, 1986) 

middle zone innerside 41C 38A 

marginal zone innerside41C 

38A 

basal spot innerside 1C 2A 

middle zone outerside 41D 39C 

marginal zone outerside41D 

39C 

basal spot outerside 1D 2B 

____________________________________________________ 

57


‘Meihauzrey’ syn Bright Minijet 



France. 

Agent: Australian Roses, Silvan, VIC. 


bushy, height short, width narrow. Stem: anthocyanin 

absent. Prickles: present, lower surface deeply concave, 

small thorn density absent, large thorn density medium. 

Leaf: size small, colour at first flowering medium green, 

upper surface glossiness medium, cross section slightly 

concave, margin undulation strong. Terminal leaflet: length 

short (20mm-28mm), width narrow (13mm-20mm), base 

shape rounded. Flowering shoot: number of flowers many. 

Flower pedicel: stiff hairs number few. Bud: shape of 

longitudinal section just before petal separation round. 

Flower: type double, number of petals very many (59-99), 

diameter small (26mm-37mm), view from top round, 

profile; upper flat, lower flattened convex, fragrance absent. 

Sepal: extensions weak. Petals: size very small, inside 

surface colour; middle zone RHS 67A, marginal zone RHS 

67A, basal spot size medium, basal spot RHS 157A, outer 

surface colour; middle zone RHS 67C, marginal zone RHS 

67A, basal spot small, basal spot RHS 157A, reflex at 

margin absent, undulation absent. Stamen filament: 

colouration white. Seed vessel: size at petal fall small. Hip: 

pitcher shaped. Time of flowering: early (late October). 

Flowering habit: almost continuous. (Note: all RHS colour 

chart number refers to 1995 edition.) 


‘Meichanso’/‘Ruimired’ x pollen parent ‘Meistondyl’ in a 

planned breeding program. Both parents are proprietary 

breeding line/variety developed by the applicant. 

Hybridisation took place in applicant’s property in Le Luc 

en Provence, France in 1991. Selection criteria: uniqueness 

of colour, well adapted to pot culture, development on own 

roots. Propagation: a number of mature stock plants were 


and were found to be uniform and stable. ‘Meihauzrey’ will 

be commercially propagated by vegetative cuttings from the 

stock plants. Breeder: Alain Antoine Meilland. 

Choice of Comparators ‘Benmjul’, ‘Benblack’, ‘Meilipo’ 

and ‘Meiselgra’ were initially considered as comparators. 

‘Benmjul’ and ‘Benblack’ were later rejected due to the 

difference in the colour of the flower, and the plant 

characteristics, which are significantly different to that of 

‘Meihauzrey’. ‘Meilipo’ was discarded due to its different 

flower shape, petal count, and flower colour. Finally, 

‘Meiselgra’ was chosen due to the similarity in plant 

characteristics, similar flower shape, and size. 

Comparative Trial Comparator: ‘Meiselgra’. Location: 





treatments applied as required. Trial design: ten pots of four 

plants per pot of ‘Meihauzrey’ and eight pots of four plants 

per pot of ‘Meiselgra’ in separate single rows. 

Measurements: from ten plants per variety at random. 





‘Meihauzrey’ *‘Meiselgra’ 

____________________________________________________ 

YOUNG SHOOT ANTHOCYANIN 

absent 

weak 

____________________________________________________ 


mean 24.35 31.70 


LSD/sig 2.53 P≤0.01 

____________________________________________________ 


slightly concave flat 

____________________________________________________ 

LEAFLET: UNDULATION OF MARGIN 

strong 

medium 

____________________________________________________ 

TERMINAL LEAFLET (length of blade) 

short 

medium 

____________________________________________________ 


rounded 

obtuse 

____________________________________________________ 


mean 80.60 47.30 


LSD/sig 9.87 P≤0.01 

____________________________________________________ 


mean 31.70 33.90 


LSD/sig 1.85 P≤0.01 

____________________________________________________ 


flat 

flattened convex 

____________________________________________________ 


flattened convex concave 

____________________________________________________ 


absent 

weak 

____________________________________________________ 


(RHS, 1995) 

67A 

57B 

____________________________________________________ 



67A 

67A 

____________________________________________________ 


medium 

large 

____________________________________________________ 

COLOUR OF BASAL SPOT INNERSIDE OF PETAL 

(RHS, 1995) 

157A 

155A 

____________________________________________________ 


(RHS, 1995) 

67C 

57D 

____________________________________________________ 

58





67A 

57D 

____________________________________________________ 


small 

large 

____________________________________________________ 


(RHS, 1995) 

157A 

155A 

____________________________________________________ 


white 

yellow 

____________________________________________________ 

‘Meihoto’ syn Sammi Minijet 



France. 

Agent: Australian Roses, Silvan, VIC. 


bushy, height short, width narrow. Stem: anthocyanin weak, 

colouration reddish brown. Prickles: present, lower surface 

deeply concave, small thorn density absent, large thorn 

density medium. Leaf: size small, colour at first flowering 

medium green, upper surface glossiness medium, cross 

section slightly concave, margin undulation strong. 

Terminal leaflet: length medium (27mm-34mm), width 

narrow (16mm-22mm), base shape rounded. Flowering 

shoot: number of flowers many. Flower pedicel: stiff hairs 

number few. Bud: shape of longitudinal section just before 

petal separation round. Flower: type double, number of 

petals very many (74-128), diameter small (30mm-37mm), 

view from top round, profile; upper flattened convex, lower 

flat, fragrance absent. Sepal: extensions absent. Petals: size 

very small, inside surface colour; middle zone RHS 62A, 

marginal zone RHS 62A, basal spot size small, basal spot 

RHS 156B, outer surface colour; middle zone RHS 62B, 

marginal zone RHS 62B, basal spot small, basal spot RHS 

156D, reflex at margin absent, undulation absent. Stamen 

filament: colouration white. Seed vessel: size at petal fall 

medium. Hip: pitcher shaped. Time of flowering: early (late 

October). Flowering habit: almost continuous. (Note: all 

RHS colour chart number refers to 1995 edition.) 


‘Meichanso’/‘Ruimired’ x pollen parent ‘Meistondyl’ in a 

planned breeding program. Both parents are proprietary 

breeding line/variety developed by the applicant. 

Hybridisation took place in applicant’s property in Le Luc 

en Provence, France in 1991. Selection criteria: uniqueness 

of colour, well adapted to pot culture, development on own 

roots. Propagation: a number of mature stock plants were 


and were found to be uniform and stable. ‘Meihoto’ will be 


stock plants. Breeder: Alain Antoine Meilland. 

Choice of Comparators ‘Hartland’, ‘Meilarac’ A and 

‘Meiselgra’ were initially considered as comparators. 

‘Hartland’ was later rejected due to the difference in the 

colour of the flower, petal count, and the plant 

characteristics are much larger (60cm in height as opposed 

to 30cm in height of ‘Meihoto’). ‘Meilarac’ A was discarded 

due to its different bush and buff flower colour. Finally, 

‘Meiselgra’ was chosen due to the similarity in plant 

characteristics, similar flower shape, and size. 

Comparative Trial Comparator: ‘Meiselgra’. Location: 





treatments applied as required. Trial design: ten pots of four 

plants per pot of ‘Meihoto’ and eight pots of four plants per 

pot of ‘Meiselgra’ in separate single rows. Measurements: 

from ten plants per variety at random. 





‘Meihoto’ *‘Meiselgra’ 

_______________________________________________ 


mean 18.4 15.3 


LSD/sig 1.16 P≤0.01 

_______________________________________________ 


slightly concave flat 

_______________________________________________ 

LEAFLET: UNDULATION OF MARGIN 

strong 

medium 

_______________________________________________ 

TERMINAL LEAFLET (length of blade) 

short 

medium 

_______________________________________________ 


rounded 

obtuse 

_______________________________________________ 


mean 95.50 47.30 


LSD/sig 16.36 P≤0.01 

_______________________________________________ 


flat 

concave 

_______________________________________________ 


absent 

weak 

_______________________________________________ 


(RHS, 1995) 

62A 

57B 

_______________________________________________ 

COLOUR OF MARGINAL SECTION INNERSIDE OF PETAL 

(RHS, 1995) 

62A 

67A 

_______________________________________________ 


small 

medium 

_______________________________________________ 

COLOUR OF BASAL SPOT INNERSIDE OF PETAL 

(RHS, 1995) 

156B 

155A 

_______________________________________________ 

59



(RHS, 1995) 

62B 

57D 

_______________________________________________ 

COLOUR OF MARGINAL SECTION OUTERSIDE OF PETAL 

(RHS, 1995) 

62B 

57D 

_______________________________________________ 


small 

large 

_______________________________________________ 


(RHS, 1995) 

156D 

155A 

_______________________________________________ 


white 

yellow 

_______________________________________________ 


medium 

small 

_______________________________________________ 

STRAWBERRY 

Fragaria x ananassa 

‘Maroochy Blaze’ 




Characteristics (Table 41, Figure 31) Plant: habit globose, 

density medium, vigour medium, medium-early maturing. 

Leaf: colour upper-side medium green (RHS 147A, 1995), 

shape in transverse cross-section strongly to slightly 

concave, blistering absent or very weak, glossiness weak to 

medium. Terminal Leaflet: longer than broad (average ratio 

1.09), shape of base obtuse, shape of incisions on margin 

crenate. Petiole: attitude of hairs strongly outwards. 

Stipules: anthocyanin absent or very weak. Stolons: number 

many. Inflorescence: position relative to foliage level with. 

Primary Flower: diameter large (average 36mm) size of 

calyx relative to corolla same size to slightly larger. Petal: 

relative position of petals overlapping, length/width ratio as 

long as broad to broader than long. Fruit: ratio of length to 

width slightly longer than broad, size large (average 27g), 

predominant shape wedged to conical or bi-conical, band 

without achenes narrow to medium, unevenness of surface 

absent to very weak, external colour dark red (RHS 53A, 

1995) and even to slightly uneven, glossiness strong, 

insertion of achenes below surface, insertion of calyx above 

fruit, attitude of calyx segments spreading, size of calyx in 

relation to fruit diameter same size, adherence of calyx to 

fruit strong, firmness firm, colour of flesh dark red (RHS 

44A, 1995), hollow centre weakly expressed, distribution of 

red colour of flesh marginal and central. Time of flowering 

and ripening medium-early. Type of bearing partially 

remontant. 


‘Chandler’ x pollen parent ‘Redlands Hope’. The seed 

parent was characterised by terminal leaflets as long as 

broad, fruit much longer than broad and soft. The pollen 

parent was characterised by fruit external colour orange red 

and internal colour light red. Hybridisation took place in 

Cleveland, QLD, Australia in 1992. From this cross, 

seedling number 93-229 was chosen from among 5000 

seedlings at Redlands Research Station, Cleveland in 1993 

using the following characteristics and advanced through 

plot selection trials in 1994, 95 and 96. Selection criteria: 

yield, yield distribution, earliness, fruit size, external and 

internal colour, resistance to bruising and abrasion, shelflife, 

flavour, attractiveness of fruit, tolerance to disease, ease 

of harvest, truss type, runner production. Propagation: by 

runners since first selection. A number of mature stock 

plants were generated from a virus indexed plant from the 

evaluated clone and also through tissue culture and were 

found to be uniform and stable. ‘Maroochy Blaze’ will be 

commercially propagated by runners and sometimes 

following tissue culture from virus indexed stock plants. 

Breeder: M. E. Herrington, S. Prytz, and J. A. Moisander, 

Queensland Horticulture Institute, Department of Primary 

Industries, Nambour and Cleveland, QLD, Australia. 

Choice of Comparators Most of the strawberry varieties of 

common knowledge at the time of the application were 

excluded on the basis of their flat or convex leaf shape in 

cross section, inflorescence position above foliage, size of 

calyx relative to corolla, high length width ratio of fruit, or 

fruit firmness. The pollen parent ‘Redlands Hope’ and the 

seed parent ‘Chandler’ were included in the comparative 

trial as the most similar varieties of common knowledge. 

Comparative Trial Comparators: ‘Redlands Hope’, 

‘Chandler’. Location: Maroochy Research Station, 

Nambour, QLD (latitude 26º37′ South, longitude 152º57′ 

East, elevation 29m), Mar-Apr to Sep 1999. Conditions: 

trial conducted in a fumigated field, runners from 

commercial sources (‘Chandler’), field station in QLD 

runner growing district (Stanthorpe), or Maroochy Res Stn 

Nambour (‘Redlands Hope’), reflective polythene mulch, 

double rows on beds (40cm inter-row, 35cm intra-row and 

140cm between bed centres), trickle irrigated and fertilised, 

pest and disease treatments applied as required. Trial 

design: randomised complete block design with 4 blocks 

and 12 plants per plot, significance tested using Duncan’s 

Multiple Range. Measurements: from twenty plants or fruit 

as five individual plants or harvested fruit sampled per 

cultivar per block. 


No prior applications. First Australian sale May 1999. First 

overseas sale nil. 

Description: M. E. Herrington and S. Prytz, Maroochy Research 

Station, Nambour and J. Moisander, Redlands Research Station, 

Cleveland, QLD. 

‘Maroochy Flame’ 





density medium, vigour medium, early maturing. Leaf: 

colour upper-side light green (RHS 147B, 1995), shape in 

transverse cross-section slightly concave to flat, blistering 

absent or very weak, glossiness weak. Terminal Leaflet: 

much longer than broad (average ratio 1.2), shape of base 

very slightly acute, shape of incisions on margin crenate. 

Petiole: attitude of hairs strongly outwards. Stipules: 

60



anthocyanin absent or very weak. Stolon: number many. 

Inflorescence: position relative to foliage beneath. Primary 

Flower: diameter medium (average 31 mm) size of calyx 

relative to corolla same size. Petal: relative position of 

petals overlapping, length/width ratio as long as broad. 

Fruit: ratio of length to width much longer than broad, size 

medium (average 18g), predominant shape wedged to 

conical or bi-conical, band without achenes medium to 

narrow, unevenness of surface absent to very weak, external 

colour red (RHS 45A, 1995) and slightly uneven, glossiness 

medium, insertion of achenes below surface, insertion of 

calyx above fruit, attitude of calyx segments spreading, size 

of calyx in relation to fruit diameter same size to very 

slightly larger, adherence of calyx to fruit strong, firmness 

firm, colour of flesh medium red (RHS 43A, 1995), hollow 

centre absent or very weakly expressed, distribution of red 

colour of flesh marginal and central. Time of flowering and 

ripening early. Type of bearing partially remontant. 


‘Chandler’ x pollen parent ‘Kabarla’. The seed parent was 

characterised by strongly to slightly concave leaves, 

terminal leaflets as long as broad, strong glossiness of fruit 

and late flowering. The pollen parent was characterised by 

flat plant habit and petals slightly broader than long. 

Hybridisation took place in Cleveland, QLD, Australia in 

1993. From this cross, seedling number 94-206 was chosen 

from among 5000 seedlings at Maroochy Research Station, 

Nambour in 1994 using the following characteristics and 

advanced through plot selection trials in 1995, 96, and 97. 

Selection criteria: yield, yield distribution, earliness, fruit 

size, external and internal colour, resistance to bruising and 

abrasion, shelf-life, flavour, attractiveness of fruit, tolerance 

to disease, ease of harvest, truss type, runner production. 

Propagation: by runners since first selection. A number of 

mature stock plants were generated from a virus indexed 

plant of the evaluated clone and also through tissue culture 

and were found to be uniform and stable. ‘Maroochy 

Flame’ will be commercially propagated by runners and 

sometimes following tissue culture from virus indexed 

stock plants. Breeder: M. E. Herrington, S. Prytz, and J. A. 

Moisander, Queensland Horticulture Institute, Department 

of Primary Industries, Nambour and Cleveland, QLD, 

Australia. 



excluded on the basis of their high chill requirement, band 

without achenes, truss type or susceptibility to fruit 

cracking due to rain. The pollen parent ‘Kabarla’ and the 

seed parent ‘Chandler’ were included in the comparative 


Other more remote potential comparators included ‘Sweet 

Charlie’ and ‘Mindarie’ but both of these were excluded 

because they are susceptible to fruit cracking due to rain. 

Comparative Trial Comparators: ‘Kabarla’, ‘Chandler’. 

Location: Maroochy Research Station, Nambour, QLD 

(latitude 26º37′ South, longitude 152º57′ East, elevation 

29m), Mar-Apr to Sep 1999. Conditions: trial conducted in 

a fumigated field, runners from commercial sources 

(comparators) or field station in QLD runner growing 

district (Stanthorpe), reflective polythene mulch, double 

rows on beds (40cm inter-row, 35cm intra-row and 140cm 

between bed centres), trickle irrigated and fertilised, pest 

and disease treatments applied as required. Trial design: 

randomised complete block design with 4 blocks and 12 

plants per plot, significance tested using Duncan’s Multiple 

Range. Measurements: from twenty plants or fruit as five 

individual plants or harvested fruit sampled per cultivar per 

block. 







‘Maroochy Jewel’ 




Characteristics (Table 41, Figure 33) Plant: habit flat, 

density medium-open, vigour medium to weak, early 

maturing. Leaf: colour upper-side medium green (RHS 

147A, 1995), shape in transverse cross-section slightly 

concave, blistering absent or very weak, glossiness weak. 

Terminal Leaflet: much longer than broad (average ratio 



Stipules: anthocyanin absent or very weak. Stolon: numbers 

many. Inflorescence: position relative to foliage level with. 

Primary Flower: diameter large (average 34mm) size of 

calyx relative to corolla larger. Petal: relative position of 



medium (average 20g), predominant shape conical or biconical 

some wedge, band without achenes medium, 

unevenness of surface absent to very weak, external colour 

red (RHS 46A, 1995) and uneven to slightly uneven, 

glossiness medium, insertion of achenes below surface, 

insertion of calyx above fruit, attitude of calyx segments 

clasping to spreading, size of calyx in relation to fruit 

diameter slightly larger, adherence of calyx to fruit very 

strong, firmness firm, colour of flesh medium red (RHS 

44A, 1995), hollow centre absent or very weakly expressed, 

distribution of red colour of flesh marginal and central. 

Time of flowering and ripening early. Type of bearing 

partially remontant. 



characterised by globose plant habit, terminal leaflets as 

long as broad, late flowering and soft fruit. The pollen 

parent was characterised by medium flower size, calyx 

spreading to reflexed and medium adherence of calyx. 

Hybridisation took place in Cleveland, QLD, Australia in 

1993. From this cross, seedling number 94-159 was chosen 

from among 5000 seedlings at Maroochy Research Station, 

Nambour in 1994 using the following characteristics and 

advanced through plot selection trials in 1995, 96, and 97. 

Selection criteria: yield, yield distribution, earliness, fruit 

size, external and internal colour, resistance to bruising and 



Propagation: by runners since first selection. A number 

61



plant from the evaluated clone and also through tissue 

culture and were found to be uniform and stable. 

‘Maroochy Jewel’ will be commercially propagated by 

runners and sometimes following tissue culture from virus 

indexed stock plants. Breeder: M. E. Herrington, S. Prytz, 

and J. A. Moisander, Queensland Horticulture Institute, 

Department of Primary Industries, Nambour and Cleveland, 

QLD, Australia. 



excluded on the basis of their high chill requirement, upright 

plant habit, truss type, fruit shape or susceptibility to fruit 

cracking due to rain. ‘Maroochy Starfire’, the most similar 

variety of common knowledge, and the parents ‘Kabarla’ 

and ‘Chandler’ were included in the comparative trial. 

Comparative Trial Comparators: ‘Maroochy Starfire’, 

‘Kabarla’, ‘Chandler’. Location: Maroochy Research 

Station, Nambour, QLD (latitude 26º37′ South, longitude 

152º57′ East, elevation 29m), Mar-Apr to Sep 1999. 

Conditions: trial conducted in a fumigated field, runners 

from commercial sources (comparators) or field station in 

QLD runner growing district (Stanthorpe), reflective 

polythene mulch, double rows on beds (40cm inter-row, 

35cm intra-row and 140cm between bed centres), trickle 

irrigated and fertilised, pest and disease treatments applied 

as required. Trial design: randomised complete block 

design with 4 blocks and 12 plants per plot, significance 

tested using Duncan’s Multiple Range. Measurements: 

from twenty plants or fruit as five individual plants or 

harvested fruit sampled per cultivar per block. 







‘Maroochy Starfire’ 




Characteristics (Table 41, Figure 34) Plant: habit flatglobose, 

density medium, vigour medium-strong, early 

maturing. Leaf: colour upper-side medium green (RHS 

147A, 1995), shape in transverse cross-section strongly to 

slightly concave, blistering absent or very weak, glossiness 

weak. Terminal Leaflet: longer than broad (average ratio 



Stipules: anthocyanin absent or very weak. Stolons: number 

many. Inflorescence: position relative to foliage beneath. 

Primary Flower: diameter medium (average 34mm) size of 

calyx relative to corolla same size. Petal: relative position of 



medium (average 15g), predominant shape bi-conical or 

conical to wedged, band without achenes medium, 

unevenness of surface absent to very weak, external colour 

dark red (RHS 46A, 1995) and slightly uneven, glossiness 

strong, insertion of achenes below surface, insertion of 

calyx above fruit, attitude of calyx segments reflexed to 

spreading, size of calyx in relation to fruit diameter same 

size to slightly larger, adherence of calyx to fruit medium 

strong, firmness firm, colour of flesh dark red (RHS 44A, 

1995), hollow centre absent or very weakly expressed, 

distribution of red colour of flesh marginal and central. 

Time of flowering and ripening early. Type of bearing 

partially remontant. 



characterised by terminal leaflets as long as broad, late 

flowering and soft fruit. The pollen parent was 

characterised by leaf cross section flat to slightly concave, 

terminal leaflets much longer than broad and fruit slightly 

longer than broad. Hybridisation took place in Cleveland, 

QLD, Australia in 1992. From this cross, seedling number 

93-486 was chosen from among 5000 seedlings at Redlands 

Research Station, Cleveland in 1993 using the following 

characteristics and advanced through plot selection trials at 

Nambour in 1994, 1995, 96, and 97. Selection criteria: 

yield, yield distribution, earliness, fruit size, external and 

internal colour, resistance to bruising and abrasion, shelflife, 

flavour, attractiveness of fruit, tolerance to disease, ease 

of harvest, truss type, runner production. Propagation: by 

runners since first selection. A number mature stock plants 

were generated from a virus indexed plant from the 

evaluated clone and also through tissue culture and were 

found to be uniform and stable. ‘Maroochy Starfire’ will be 

commercially propagated by runners and sometimes 

following tissue culture from virus indexed stock plants. 

Breeder: M. E. Herrington, S. Prytz, and J. A. Moisander, 

Queensland Horticulture Institute, Department of Primary 

Industries, Nambour and Cleveland, QLD, Australia. 



excluded on the basis of their high chill requirement, 

upright plant habit, truss type or susceptibility to fruit 

cracking due to rain. The seed parent ‘Chandler’ and the 

pollen parent ‘Kabarla’ were included in the comparative 


Other more remote potential comparators included ‘Sweet 

Charlie’ and ‘Mindarie’ but both of these were excluded 

because they are susceptible to fruit cracking due to rain. 

Comparative Trial Comparators: ‘Chandler’, ‘Kabarla’. 

Location: Maroochy Research Station, Nambour, QLD 

(latitude 26º37′ South, longitude 152º57′ East, elevation 

29m), Mar-Apr to Sep 1999. Conditions: trial conducted in 

a fumigated field, runners from commercial sources 

(comparators) or field station in QLD runner growing 

district (Stanthorpe), reflective polythene mulch, double 

rows on beds (40cm inter-row, 35cm intra-row and 140cm 

between bed centres), trickle irrigated and fertilised, pest 

and disease treatments applied as required. Trial design: 

randomised complete block design with 4 blocks and 12 

plants per plot, significance tested using Duncan’s Multiple 

Range. Measurements: from twenty plants or fruit as five 

individual plants or harvested fruit sampled per cultivar per 

block. 




62






‘Maroochy Sundew’ 




Characteristics (Table 41, Figure 34) Plant: habit flat 

globose, density dense, vigour strong, mid maturing. Leaf: 

colour upper-side medium green (RHS 146A, 1995), 

shape in transverse cross-section slightly concave, 

blistering absent or very weak, glossiness weak. Terminal 

Leaflet: longer than broad (average ratio 1.06), shape of 

base obtuse, shape of incisions on margin crenate. Petiole: 

attitude of hairs strongly outwards. Stipules: anthocyanin 

absent or very weak. Stolons: numbers many. 

Inflorescence: position relative to foliage beneath. 

Primary Flower: diameter medium (average 33 mm) size 

of calyx relative to corolla smaller. Petal: relative position 

of petals overlapping, length/width ratio slightly to much 

broader than long. Fruit: ratio of length to width much 

longer than broad, size medium (average 19g), 

predominant shape bi-conical to wedged and some 

conical, band without achenes medium, unevenness of 

surface absent to very weak, external colour red (RHS 

45A, 1995) and slightly uneven, glossiness medium, 

insertion of achenes below surface, insertion of calyx 

above fruit, attitude of calyx segments spreading, size of 

calyx in relation to fruit diameter same size, adherence of 

calyx to fruit very strong, firmness firm, colour of flesh 

medium red (RHS 44A, 1995), hollow centre absent or 

very weakly expressed, distribution of red colour of flesh 

marginal and central. Time of flowering and ripening 

medium. Type of bearing partially remontant. 


‘Kabarla’ x pollen parent ‘Chandler’. The seed parent was 

characterised by terminal leaflet much longer than broad, 

medium flower size (28 mm) and fruit slightly longer than 

broad. The pollen parent was characterised by terminal 

leaflet as long as broad and soft fruit. Hybridisation took 

place in Cleveland, QLD, Australia in 1993. From this 

cross, seedling number 94-059 was chosen from among 

5000 seedlings at Maroochy Research Station, Nambour in 

1994 using the following characteristics and advanced 

through plot selection trials in 1995, 96, and 97. Selection 

criteria: yield, yield distribution, earliness, fruit size, 

external and internal colour, resistance to bruising and 



Propagation: by runners since first selection. A number of 


plant from the evaluated clone and also through tissue 

culture and were found to be uniform and stable. 

‘Maroochy Sundew’ will be commercially propagated by 

runners and sometimes following tissue culture from virus 

indexed stock plants. Breeder: M. E. Herrington, S. Prytz, 

and J. A. Moisander, Queensland Horticulture Institute, 

Department of Primary Industries, Nambour and Cleveland, 

QLD, Australia. 

Choice of Comparators. Most of the strawberry varieties 

of common knowledge at the time of the application were 


upright or flat plant habit, truss type, fruit shape or 

susceptibility to fruit cracking due to rain. ‘Maroochy 

Starfire’, the most similar variety of common knowledge, 

and the parents ‘Kabarla’ and ‘Chandler’ were included in 

the comparative trial. 

Comparative Trial Comparators: ‘Maroochy Starfire’, 

‘Kabarla’, ‘Chandler’. Location: Maroochy Research 

Station, Nambour, QLD (latitude 26º37′ South, longitude 

152º57′ East, elevation 29m), Mar-Apr to Sep 1999. 

Conditions: trial conducted in a fumigated field, runners 

from commercial sources (comparators) or field station in 

QLD runner growing district (Stanthorpe), reflective 

polythene mulch, double rows on beds (40cm inter-row, 35 

cm intra-row and 140cm between bed centres), trickle 

irrigated and fertilised, pest and disease treatments applied 

as required. Trial design: randomised complete block 

design with 4 blocks and 12 plants per plot, significance 

tested using Duncan’s Multiple Range. Measurements: 

from twenty plants or fruit as five individual plants or 

harvested fruit sampled per cultivar per block. 







‘Sweet Charlie’ 


Applicant: Florida Foundation Seed Producers Inc, 

Greenwood, Florida, USA. 

Agent: The State of Queensland through its Department 

of Primary Industries, Brisbane, QLD. 


density open to medium, vigour weak to medium. Leaf: 

colour upper-side dark green (RHS 147A, 1995), shape in 

transverse cross-section strongly concave, blistering absent 

or very weak, glossiness medium weak. Terminal Leaflet: 

longer than broad (average ratio 1.06), shape of base obtuse, 

shape of incisions on margin crenate. Petiole: attitude of 

hairs strongly outwards. Stipules: anthocyanin absent or 

very weak. Stolons: number many. Inflorescence: position 

relative to foliage level with to slightly beneath. Primary 

Flower: diameter medium (average 32 mm), size of calyx 

relative to corolla same size. Petal: relative position of 

petals overlapping, length/width ratio slightly broader than 

long. Fruit: ratio of length to width slightly longer than 

broad, size medium (average 18g), predominant shape 

conical, band without achenes narrow, unevenness of 

surface absent to very weak, external colour red (RHS 45A, 

1995) and slightly uneven, glossiness strong, insertion of 

achenes level with surface, insertion of calyx above fruit, 

attitude of calyx segments spreading, size of calyx in 

relation to fruit diameter slightly larger, adherence of calyx 

to fruit weak, firmness medium firm, colour of flesh 

medium red (RHS 43A, 1995), hollow centre weakly 

expressed, distribution of red colour of flesh marginal and 

central. Time of flowering and ripening early. Type of 

bearing partially remontant. 

63



FL 80-456 x pollen parent ‘Pajaro’. The seed parent was 

characterised by anthracnose (Colletotrichum spp.) 

resistance. The pollen parent was characterised by very 

strong adherence of calyx, medium to soft fruit and medium 

to late flowering. The seeds resulting from the controlled 

hybridisation in Dover, Florida, USA in 1985 were 

germinated in a greenhouse and the resulting seedlings were 

planted and allowed to produce daughter plants (by asexual 

propagation). These plants later fruited and one pair, FL 85- 

4925 was selected from its outstanding fruit quality and 

high yield at Gulf Coast Research and Education Center, 

Dover in 1986. Propagation: by runners since first selection. 

Entry to Australia was by tissue culture from stock plants, 

subsequent heat therapy and re tissue cultured through 

quarantine. A number of mature stock plants were 

generated from virus indexed plants and also through tissue 

culture and were found to be uniform and stable. ‘Sweet 

Charlie’ will be commercially propagated by runners and 

sometimes following tissue culture from virus indexed 

stock plants. Breeder: C. M. Howard, University of Florida, 

Gulf Coast Research and Education Center, Dover, USA. 




inflorescence position relative to foliage, external or 

internal colour of fruit, adherence of calyx, or pose of calyx 

segments. ‘Redlands Joy’ and ‘Kabarla’ the most similar 

varieties of common knowledge, and the pollen parent 

‘Pajaro’ were included in the comparative trial. The seed 

parent ‘FL 80-456’ was not included in the trial as it was a 

non-commercial US breeding line no longer available. 

Comparative Trial Comparators: ‘Pajaro’, ‘Redlands Joy’, 

‘Kabarla’. Location: Maroochy Research Station, 

Nambour, QLD (latitude 26º37′ South, longitude 152º57′ 

East, elevation 29m), Mar-Apr to Sep 1999. Conditions: 

trial conducted in a fumigated field, runners from 

commercial sources (comparators) or field station in QLD 

runner growing district (Stanthorpe), ‘Sweet Charlie’ plants 

were established in pots for 4 weeks before field planting, 

reflective polythene mulch, double rows on beds (40cm 

inter-row, 35cm intra-row and 140cm between bed centres), 

trickle irrigated and fertilised, pest and disease treatments 

applied as required. Trial design: randomised complete 

block design with 4 blocks and 12 plants per plot, 

significance tested using Duncan’s Multiple Range. 

Measurements: from twenty plants or fruit as five individual 

plants or harvested fruit sampled per cultivar per block. 



Argentina 1993 Granted ‘Sweet Charlie’ 

Canada 1994 Applied ‘Sweet Charlie’ 

Germany 1994 Granted ‘Sweet Charlie’ 

Spain 1994 Applied ‘Sweet Charlie’ 

France 1993 Granted ‘Sweet Charlie’ 

Italy 1993 Applied ‘Sweet Charlie’ 

Portugal 1993 Granted ‘Sweet Charlie’ 

European Union 1997 Granted ‘Sweet Charlie’ 

USA 1992 Granted ‘Sweet Charlie’ 

First Australian sale Nil. First overseas sale: USA, 17 

Sept 1992. 


Station, Nambour QLD. 

Table 41 Fragaria varieties 

‘Maroochy ‘Maroochy ‘Maroochy ‘Maroochy ‘Maroochy ‘Sweet *‘Redlands *‘Redlands *‘Kabarla’ *‘Chandler’*‘Pajaro’ 

Sundew’ Jewel’ Blaze’ Flame’ Starfire’ Charlie’ Joy’ Hope’ 

______________________________________________________________________________________________________________ 

PLANT: HEIGHT (cm, at maximum height) [LSR, r2 = 2.1, r11= 2.4] 

mean 15 a 12 bc 13 abc 15 a 13 abc 12 c 14 ab 15 a 13 abc 13 abc 11 c 

std deviation 1.6 1.9 1.1 1.7 1.4 1.1 1.6 1.5 1.3 1.2 1.1 

______________________________________________________________________________________________________________ 

PLANT: WIDTH (cm, at maximum width) [LSR, r2 = 3.8, r11= 4.4] 

mean 40 a 36 bc 35 c 37 abc 36 bc 28 d 40 ab 36 bc 40 ab 29 d 27 d 

std deviation 4.1 3.3 4.4 2.8 1.9 2.6 2.7 2.9 2.5 1.8 2.8 

______________________________________________________________________________________________________________ 

PLANT: RATIO HEIGHT/WIDTH (maximum height and width) [LSR, r2 = 0.06, r11= 0.07] 

mean 0.36 abcd 0.33 cd 0.38 abc 0.39 abc 0.37 abcd 0.42 ab 0.36 bcd 0.41 ab 0.31 d 0.43 a 0.42 ab 

std deviation 0.04 0.035 0.052 0.045 0.048 0.047 0.045 0.053 0.034 0.051 0.028 

______________________________________________________________________________________________________________ 

PLANT: HABIT 

flat flat globose globose flat globose globose globose flat globose globose 

globose globose to flat 

globose 

______________________________________________________________________________________________________________ 

PLANT: DENSITY 

dense medium medium medium medium open to open medium medium medium open to 

to open to dense medium to open medium 

______________________________________________________________________________________________________________ 

PLANT: VIGOUR 

strong medium medium medium medium weak to medium medium medium medium weak 

to weak to strong medium to weak 

______________________________________________________________________________________________________________ 

LEAF: SHAPE IN CROSS 

slightly slightly strongly slightly strongly strongly flat slightly flat to strongly strongly 

concave concave to slightly concave to slightly concave concave slightly to slightly to slightly 

concave to flat concave concave concave concave 

64



Table 41 continued 

____________________________________________________ 

TERMINAL LEAFLET: LENGTH (mm) [LSR, r2 = 9.2, r11= 10.7] 

mean 67 ab 65 abc 60 abc 69 a 64 abc 57 bc 60 abc 67abc 64 abc 62 abc 57 c 

std deviation 11.2 7.6 5.8 7.7 7.6 6.8 6.4 5.1 13.1 4.3 4.2 

______________________________________________________________________________________________________________ 

TERMINAL LEAFLET: WIDTH (mm) [LSR, r2 = 7.6, r11= 8.8] 

mean 64 ab 53 c 55 bc 58 abc 60 abc 54 c 58 abc 58 abc 54 c 65 a 57 abc 

std deviation 8.7 5.5 5.1 7 6.8 6.1 5.8 4.2 9.2 5.2 3.7 

______________________________________________________________________________________________________________ 

TERMINAL LEAFLET: RATIO LENGTH/WIDTH (maximum length and width) [LSR, r2 = 0.085, r11= 0.099] 

mean 1.06 c 1.24 a 1.09 bc 1.2 a 1.07 bc 1.06 c 1.03 cd 1.15 ab 1.19 a 0.96 d 1.00 cd 

std deviation 0.073 0.1 0.095 0.113 0.043 0.053 0.06 0.094 0.112 0.053 0.056 

______________________________________________________________________________________________________________ 

TERMINAL LEAFLET: SHAPE OF BASE 

obtuse obtuse obtuse very obtuse obtuse obtuse obtuse obtuse obtuse obtuse 

slightly 

acute 

______________________________________________________________________________________________________________ 

TERMINAL LEAFLET: SHAPE OF INCISIONS OF MARGIN 

crenate crenate crenate crenate crenate crenate crenate crenate crenate crenate crenate 

______________________________________________________________________________________________________________ 

STOLONS: NUMBER PER PLANT (number of stolons produced during summer/autumn -from previous observations) 

many many many many many many medium many many many medium 

______________________________________________________________________________________________________________ 

INFLORECENCE POSITION RELATIVE TO FOLIAGE 

beneath level with level with beneath beneath level with level with level with level beneath level with 

to slightly to slightly to slightly to slightly to level 

beneath beneath above beneath with 

______________________________________________________________________________________________________________ 

FLOWER: DIAMETER (mm) [LSR, r2 = 3.4, r11= 3.9] 

mean 33 ab 34 ab 36 a 31 bc 34 ab 32 ab 33 ab 34 ab 28 c 36 a 33 ab 

std deviation 6 3.7 4.2 4.6 4.0 4.0 3.4 3.3 3.8 2.9 3.4 

______________________________________________________________________________________________________________ 

FLOWER: SIZE OF CALYX RELATIVE TO COROLLA 

smaller larger same size same size same size same size smaller same size same size same size larger 

to slightly 

to slightly 

larger 

larger 

______________________________________________________________________________________________________________ 

FLOWER:PRIMARY: RELATIVE POSITION OF PETALS 

over- over- over- over- over- over- over- over- over- over- overlapping 

lapping lapping lapping lapping lapping lapping lapping lapping lapping lapping 

______________________________________________________________________________________________________________ 

FLOWER:PETAL:LENGTH/WIDTH RATIO 

slightly as long as long as long as long slightly broader as long slightly broader as long 

to much as broad as broad as broad as broad broader than long as broad broader than long as broad 

longer to broader than long than long 

than broad than long 

______________________________________________________________________________________________________________ 

FRUIT: LENGTH (mm) [LSR, r2 = 5.3, r11= 6.2] 

mean 42 ab 46 ab 46 ab 47 ab 47 a 46 ab 43 ab 48 a 41 b 47 a 43 ab 

std deviation 7.4 4.3 7.6 3.1 3.9 4.0 4.8 3.7 5.8 5 3.5 

______________________________________________________________________________________________________________ 

FRUIT: WIDTH (mm) [LSR, r2 = 4.5, r11= 5.2] 

mean 33 d 37 bcd 42 ab 39 bc 33 d 39 bc 39 bc 45 a 36 cd 37 bcd 35 cd 

std deviation 5.3 3.6 6.3 3.2 3.3 3.3 5.0 4.8 4.4 5.6 2.8 

______________________________________________________________________________________________________________ 

FRUIT: LENGTH/WIDTH RATIO (leaf length/width along maximum dimensions) [LSR, r2 = 0.111, r11= 0.129] 

mean 1.29 b 1.24 bc 1.09 de 1.21 bcd 1.43 a 1.18 bcd 1.13 cde 1.06 e 1.12 cde 1.30 b 1.23 bc 

std deviation 0.14 0.12 0.10 0.09 0.14 0.08 0.10 0.08 0.09 0.11 0.09 

______________________________________________________________________________________________________________ 

FRUIT: SIZE 

medium medium large medium medium medium medium large medium medium medium 

______________________________________________________________________________________________________________ 

FRUIT: PREDOMINANT SHAPE 

bi conical conical wedged wedged bi-conical conical conical conical wedged conical conical 

to to bi- and to to to to to 

wedged conical conical conical conical wedged wedged conical 

and and and and and and 

conical wedged bi- bi- wedged biconical 

conical conical 

______________________________________________________________________________________________________________ 

65



FRUIT: BAND WITHOUT ACHENES 

medium medium narrow to medium medium narrow narrow medium medium medium narrow 

medium to narrow to narrow 

______________________________________________________________________________________________________________ 

FRUIT: COLOUR EXTERNAL (on fruit 3 days after harvest, RHS, 1995) 

45A 46A 53A 45A 46A 45A 45A 44A 45A 46A 46A 

______________________________________________________________________________________________________________ 

FRUIT: EVENESS OF COLOUR 

slightly uneven to even to slightly slightly slightly slightly slightly slightly slightly slightly 

uneven slightly slightly uneven uneven uneven uneven uneven uneven uneven uneven 

uneven uneven 

______________________________________________________________________________________________________________ 

FRUIT: GLOSSINESS 

medium medium strong medium strong strong medium strong medium strong strong 

to strong 

______________________________________________________________________________________________________________ 

FRUIT: INSERTION OF ACHENES 

below below below below below level below below below below level 

surface surface surface surface surface with surface surface surface surface with 

surface 

surface 

______________________________________________________________________________________________________________ 

FRUIT: INSERTION OF CALYX 

above above above above above above with fruit above above above with fruit 

fruit fruit fruit fruit fruit fruit level fruit fruit fruit level 

______________________________________________________________________________________________________________ 

FRUIT: ATTITUDE OF CALYX SEGMENTS 

spreading clasping spreading spreading reflexed spreading spreading spreading spreading spreading spreading 

to to to to to 

spreading spreading reflexed reflexed reflexed 

______________________________________________________________________________________________________________ 

FRUIT: SIZE OF CALYX IN RELATION TO FRUIT DIAMETER 

same size slightly same size same size same size slightly slightly same size slightly slightly much 

larger to very to larger smaller smaller larger larger 

slightly slightly to same 

larger larger size 

______________________________________________________________________________________________________________ 

FRUIT: ADHERENCE OF CALYX 

very very strong strong medium weak strong medium medium medium very 

strong strong strong strong strong strong 

______________________________________________________________________________________________________________ 

FRUIT: FIRMNESS 

firm firm firm firm firm medium medium firm medium soft medium 

firm firm soft 

______________________________________________________________________________________________________________ 

FRUIT: COLOUR OF FLESH (RHS, 1995) 

44A 44A 44A 43A 44A 43A 43A 39B 44A 44A 46B 

______________________________________________________________________________________________________________ 

FRUIT: HOLLOW CENTRE 

absent or absent or weakly absent or absent or weakly weakly weakly weakly absent or weakly 

very very expressed very very expressed expressed to expressed very expressed 

weakly weakly weakly weakly strongly weakly 

expressed expressed expressed expressed expressed expressed 

______________________________________________________________________________________________________________ 

TIME OF FLOWERING 

medium early medium early early early early medium early late medium 

to early 

to late 

______________________________________________________________________________________________________________ 

TYPE OF BEARING 

partially partially partially partially partially partially partially partially partially not partially 

remontant remontant remontant remontant remontant remontant remontant remontant remontant remontant remontant 

______________________________________________________________________________________________________________ 

*Note: the mean values followed by the same letters are not significantly different at P≤0.01 according to Duncan’s Multiple Range Test. LSR, r2 and r11 is 

the Least Significant Range for the first and the last ranking order respectively. 

66



SUGARCANE 

Saccharum hybrid 

‘Q176’ 


Applicant: Bureau of Sugar Experiment Stations, 

Indooroopilly, QLD. 

Characteristics (Table 42, Figure 50) Ploidy: cytologically 

complex polyploid and aneuploid interspecific sugarcane 

hybrid. Plant: perennial grass with erect to semi erect 

growth habit, medium tillers per stool. Leaf canopy is very 

light to light. Suckers are very few in number. Stem: culms 

are short with mean length to top visible dewlap (TVD) 

approximately 2.42m (range 1.76 to 3.12m). Alternate 

internodes of a culm are arranged in a weakly to medium 

zigzagged pattern. Length of longest internode on bud side 

is short with mean length approximately 17.5cm (range 

14.3 to 21.0cm) and side opposite bud is very short to short 

with mean length approximately 17.1 cm (range 14.0 to 

20.8cm). Diameter of longest internode central and 

perpendicular to bud is thick with mean approximately 

24.6mm (range 19.2 to 31.2mm). Diameter of longest 

internode central and dissecting bud is thick with mean 

approximately 24.5mm (range 18.5 to 30.6mm). Internodes 

are cylindrical to concave-convex shaped and round in 

cross-section. Colour of dewaxed internode is yellow-green 

(RHS 144A) to greyed-brown (RHS 199A) exposed and 

greyed-yellow (RHS 160B) unexposed. Wax covering of 

internode is light to medium, with wax band distinct and 

narrow. Growth cracks are absent. Cork cracks are absent. 

Bud groove presence is medium and medium to long in 

length. Root band width on bud side is narrow (6.0-7.0mm). 

Bud is of very weak to weak prominence, ovate to 

rhomboid in shape, and with base near to leaf scar and tip 

level to the growth ring. Bud width excluding wings is very 

narrow to narrow and bud wing is medium to wide in width. 

Leaf scar is medium to prominent and oblique descending 

towards bud. Growth ring is flush. Leaf: lamina of TVD leaf 

is short to medium in length with mean approximately 

1.57m (range 1.19 to 1.75m), very narrow to narrow with 

mean width approximately 36.1mm (range 28.6 to 41.4mm) 

at longitudinal midpoint, and curved near tip in attitude. 

Midrib of lamina at longitudinal midpoint is medium with 

mean 4.0mm (range 2.5 to 5.0mm). Lamina width to midrib 

width ratio is very low with mean approximately 9.2 (range 

7.4 to 11.4). Leaf sheath of TVD leaf is medium in length 

with mean length approximately 33.2cm (range 25.5 to 

39.5cm). Sheath of senescent leaves have weak adherence 

to culm. Hairs on abaxial leaf sheath surface (Group 57) are 

dense with medium length. Ligule is deltoid in shape 

medium at midrib section. Cilia along the free margin of the 

ligule (Group 61) are medium density and medium in 

length. Auricles are prominent and asymmetrical. Inner or 

underlapping auricle is lanceolate in shape and medium in 

size. Outer or overlapping auricle is deltoid shape and large 

in size. Flowering: flower is an open panicle and flowering 

is discontinuous and medium. Seed: seed or fruit is a 

caryopsis. Disease resistance: highly resistant to Fiji disease 

virus, highly resistant to Leaf Scald (Xanthomonas 

albilineans (Ashby) Dowson), intermediate resistance to 

Red Rot (Glomerella tucumanensis (Spego) Arx and 

Mueller), intermediate to Pachymetra Root Rot, and highly 

susceptible to sugarcane mosaic virus. Other 

characteristics: fibre quantity and quality are acceptable for 

milling purposes (impact reading 0.52, shear strength 32.0, 

short fibre 56.0%). 

Origin and Breeding Controlled pollination: ‘Q176’ is the 

progeny of a controlled biparental cross made at Meringa 

(Gordonvale), QLD, between the female parent ‘Q117’ and 

the male parent ‘67C444’. Seed was collected from the 

pollinated female inflorescence and stored for germination 

in 1988. ‘Q176’ has very light to light leaf canopy 

compared with the female parent ‘Q117’ which is medium 

to heavy. ‘Q176’ has a grey-yellow (RHS 160B to 160C) 

unexposed internode colour, light to medium wax covering 

and a distinct wax band compared with ‘Q117’ which has a 

yellow-green (RHS 152B to 152D) internode colour, heavy 

wax covering, and indistinct wax band. Compared with its 

male parent ‘67C444’, which is intermediate to susceptible 

to Fiji disease virus, ‘Q176’ is highly resistant. ‘Q176’ has 

been evaluated and selected by BSES in yield trials on the 

Burdekin Sugar Experiment Station and sites within the 

sugarcane growing area in the Burdekin region. Standard 

commercial varieties were also included in the trials for 

comparative purposes. Selection criteria: cane yield, 

commercial cane sugar (ccs), and sugar yield have been the 

main selection criteria. Disease resistance screening was 

conducted at the pathology farm (Eight Mile Plains) and in 

the Tully glasshouse. Propagation: after an initial seedling 

stage (using seed from the cross), all subsequent stages have 

involved vegetative propagation. Breeder: Bureau of Sugar 

Experiment Stations, QLD. 

Choice of Comparators ‘Q96’, ‘Q124’, and ‘Q127’ were 

chosen, as these are most similar varieties of common 

knowledge grown in the Burdekin region. Together, they 

accounted for over 57% (4.57 million) of the Burdekin crop 

in 1998. The female parent ‘Q117’ was also included as a 

comparator and it was the major variety in the Burdekin in 

1998 (37%, 2.96 million t). ‘67C444’ was excluded because 

it can be distinguished on the basis of resistance to Fiji 

disease as stated above. 

Comparative Trial Comparators: ‘Q96’, ‘Q124’, 

‘Q127’and ‘Q117’. Location: conducted at Meringa Sugar 

Experiment Station (17º 12′S, 145º 45′E), Gordonvale, 

QLD. The trial was planted 26 Sep 1997, harvested on 3 

Nov 1998 and ratooned. DUS data were recorded in early 

Jun 1999. Conditions: clones were propagated from 

vegetative cuttings and grown under field conditions. Soil 

type: white schist. Watering regime: rainfed. Chemicals: 

Aretan (400 ml/400 L) and suSCon (14 kg/ha). Fertilisers: 

DAP (120 kg/ha – N 21.6, P 24) at planting, Muriate of 

potash (200 kg/ha – K 100) and urea (180 kg/ha – N 83) on 

1-2 Dec 1997; CK50/50 (512 kg/ha – N 199, K 120) on 24 

Nov 1998. Trial design: clones were grown in a randomised 

complete block design with three replicates. Plots were 

single row by 9m, with 1.5m between rows. Measurements: 

taken from up to 20 stalks sampled randomly per plot. 


First sold in Australia in Jun 1998. 

Description: Dr Mike Cox, BSES, Bundaberg, QLD. 

67


Table 42 Saccharum varieties 

‘Q176’ *‘Q96’ *‘Q124’ *‘Q127’ *‘Q117’ 

______________________________________________________________________________________________________________ 

GROWTH HABIT erect to semi-erect erect to erect to erect 

semi-erect semi-erect semi-erect semi-erect 

______________________________________________________________________________________________________________ 

TILLERING medium few to medium few to medium medium to many medium 

______________________________________________________________________________________________________________ 

LEAF CANOPY very light to light light medium medium medium to heavy 

______________________________________________________________________________________________________________ 

SUCKERING very few very few very few very few to few very few 

______________________________________________________________________________________________________________ 

CULM HEIGHT (m) LSD (P ≤ 0.01) = 0.29 

mean 2.42a 2.59a 2.46a 2.69a 2.45a 

std deviation 0.28 0.19 0.23 0.30 0.22 

short medium short to medium medium short 

______________________________________________________________________________________________________________ 

ALIGNMENT OF INTERNODES – Zigzaggedness 

weak to weak to aligned to medium weak to 

medium medium weak medium 

______________________________________________________________________________________________________________ 

INTERNODE LENGTH – Bud Side (cm) LSD (P ≤ 0.01) = 2.36 

mean 17.5ab 21.8c 19.2bc 19.5bc 16.0a 

std deviation 1.70 1.78 2.05 2.13 2.01 

short long to very long medium medium very short 

______________________________________________________________________________________________________________ 

INTERNODE LENGTH – Side Opposite Bud (cm) LSD (P ≤ 0.01) = 2.33 

mean 17.1ab 21.3c 19.0bc 19.0bc 15.6a 

std deviation 1.70 1.73 2.13 2.20 2.04 

very short to short long to very long medium medium very short 

______________________________________________________________________________________________________________ 

INTERNODE WIDTH – Central Perpendicular to Bud (mm) LSD (P ≤ 0.01) = 1.79 

mean 24.6ab 22.5a 23.6a 23.9a 26.1b 

std deviation 2.42 1.90 2.50 2.67 2.27 

thick thin to medium medium to thick medium to thick very thick 

______________________________________________________________________________________________________________ 

INTERNODE WIDTH – Central Dissecting Bud (mm) LSD (P ≤ 0.01) = 1.91 

mean 24.5a 23.2a 23.5a 23.6a 26.9b 

std deviation 2.46 1.91 2.61 2.65 2.37 

thick thin to medium medium medium very thick 

______________________________________________________________________________________________________________ 

INTERNODE SHAPE 

cylindrical to bobbin shaped cylindrical to weakly conoidal cylindrical to 

concave-convex bobbin shaped weakly tumescent 

______________________________________________________________________________________________________________ 

INTERNODE CROSS-SECTION 

round round round round weakly oval 

______________________________________________________________________________________________________________ 

INTERNODE DEWAXED COLOUR (RHS) – Exposed 

yellow-green greyed-purple greyed-orange greyed-orange yellow-green 

(144A to 152B) (187A to 187B) (166A) (166A) to (152A) to 

to grey-brown yellow-green greyed orange 

(199A) (146B) (165A) 

______________________________________________________________________________________________________________ 

INTERNODE DEWAXED COLOUR (RHS) – Unexposed 

grey-yellow yellow (11B) to greyed-red yellow-green yellow-green 

(160B to 160C) greyed-orange (182D) to (152D) to (152B to 

(166A) greyed-yellow greyed-yellow 152 D) 

(162C) 

(160A) 

______________________________________________________________________________________________________________ 

INTERNODE WAX COVERING 

light to medium to medium to medium heavy 

medium heavy heavy 

______________________________________________________________________________________________________________ 

WAX BAND DISTINCTIVENESS 

distinct distinct distinct distinct indistinct 

______________________________________________________________________________________________________________ 

68




__________________________________________________ 

BAND WIDTH narrow very narrow narrow very narrow narrow 

to narrow 

______________________________________________________________________________________________________________ 

GROWTH CRACKS absent absent absent absent absent to 

very few 

______________________________________________________________________________________________________________ 

CORK CRACKS absent absent few numerous very few 

to few 

______________________________________________________________________________________________________________ 

BUD GROOVE PRESENCE 

medium inconspicuous inconspicuous inconspicuous medium 

______________________________________________________________________________________________________________ 

BUD GROOVE LENGTH 

medium to long very short short long medium 

______________________________________________________________________________________________________________ 

BUD GROOVE DEPTH very shallow very shallow very shallow very shallow very shallow 

to shallow 

to shallow 

______________________________________________________________________________________________________________ 

ROOT BAND WIDTH – Bud Side 

narrow medium narrow wide narrow to medium 

(6.0-7.0mm) (7.0-9.4mm) (6.0-7.0mm) (8.9mm) (6.9-8.2mm) 

______________________________________________________________________________________________________________ 

BUD – PROMINENCE very weak weak weak very weak very weak 

to weak 

to weak 

______________________________________________________________________________________________________________ 

BUD – SHAPE ovate to ovate round to ovate ovate oval to triangular 

rhomboid 

pointed 

______________________________________________________________________________________________________________ 

BUD – POSITION OF BASE (Above Leaf Scar) 

near near near to medium near medium 

______________________________________________________________________________________________________________ 

BUD – POSITION OF TIP (Relative to Growth Ring) 

level below level level to slightly above 

below 

______________________________________________________________________________________________________________ 

BUD WIDTH (Excluding Wings) 

very narrow medium medium narrow to narrow to 

to narrow medium medium 

______________________________________________________________________________________________________________ 

BUD WING WIDTH medium to narrow to medium to narrow to narrow to 

wide medium wide medium medium 

______________________________________________________________________________________________________________ 

LEAF SCAR PROMINENCE 

medium to prominent prominent prominent prominent 

prominent 

______________________________________________________________________________________________________________ 

GROWTH RING flush depressed to flush swollen flush flush 

to swollen 

______________________________________________________________________________________________________________ 

LAMINA LENGTH (TVD Leaf) (m) LSD (P ≤ 0.01) = 0.11 

mean 1.57a 1.75b 1.61a 1.59a 1.56a 

std deviation 0.12 0.15 0.12 0.09 0.12 

short to medium very long medium short to medium short 

______________________________________________________________________________________________________________ 

LAMINA WIDTH (Longitudinal Midpoint) (mm) LSD (P ≤ 0.01) = 5.3 

mean 36.1a 37.3ab 36.7a 41.1ab 42.8b 

std deviation 3.4 4.0 4.7 5.5 4.9 

very narrow to narrow very narrow to narrow to medium medium 

narrow 

narrow 

______________________________________________________________________________________________________________ 

MIDRIB WIDTH (Longitudinal Midpoint) (mm) LSD (P ≤ 0.01) = 0.5 

mean 4.0b 4.1b 3.9ab 3.4a 4.0b 

std deviation 0.5 0.5 0.5 0.5 0.6 

medium medium to wide medium very narrow to medium 

narrow 

______________________________________________________________________________________________________________ 

69



__________________________________________________ 

LAMINA WIDTH/MIDRIB WIDTH RATIO 

very low very low low very high medium 

______________________________________________________________________________________________________________ 

LAMINA ATTITUDE curve near curve near curve near curve near curve near 

tip middle middle middle middle 

______________________________________________________________________________________________________________ 

LEAF SHEATH – ADHERENCE TO CULM 

weak weak to medium medium weak to medium weak to medium 

______________________________________________________________________________________________________________ 

LENGTH OF TVD LEAF SHEATH (cm) LSD (P ≤ 0.01) = 2.5 

mean 33.2b 38.3c 35.9bc 35.9bc 28.2a 

std deviation 2.8 2.1 2.9 2.0 2.0 

medium long to very long long long very short 

______________________________________________________________________________________________________________ 

HAIR GROUP 57 – OCCURRENCE 

dense absent absent dense dense 

______________________________________________________________________________________________________________ 

HAIR GROUP 57 – LENGTH 

medium n/a n/a very short medium to long 

______________________________________________________________________________________________________________ 

LIGULE SHAPE deltoid deltoid deltoid crescentiform deltoid 

______________________________________________________________________________________________________________ 

HAIR GROUP 61 – DENSITY/OCCURRENCE 

medium medium medium to dense dense dense 

______________________________________________________________________________________________________________ 

AURICLE -PROMINENCE (Second Fully Unfurled Leaf) 

prominent inconspicuous medium inconspicuous medium to 

prominent 

______________________________________________________________________________________________________________ 

AURICLE SHAPE – ULP 

lanceolate deltoid lanceolate deltoid deltoid to 

dentoid 

______________________________________________________________________________________________________________ 

AURICLE SHAPE – OLP 

deltoid transitional transitional transitional lanceolate 

______________________________________________________________________________________________________________ 

AURICLE SIZE – ULP 

medium very small to small medium medium 

small 

______________________________________________________________________________________________________________ 

AURICLE SIZE – OLP 

large n/a n/a n/a medium 

______________________________________________________________________________________________________________ 

FLOWERING medium medium to sparse very sparse sparse to medium 

profuse 

______________________________________________________________________________________________________________ 

Means followed by the same letter are not significantly different at P ≤ 0.01, Duncan’s Multiple Range Test 

‘Q177’ 






hybrid. Plant: perennial grass with erect growth habit, many 

tillers per stool. Leaf canopy is heavy. Suckers are very few 

in number. Stem: culms are medium with mean length to 

top visible dewlap (TVD) approximately 2.59m (range 2.25 

to 3.06m). Alternate internodes of a culm are arranged in a 

weakly zigzagged pattern. Length of longest internode on 

bud side is medium to long with mean length approximately 

17.3cm (range 14.5 to 21.5cm) and side opposite bud is 

medium to long with mean length approximately 16.9cm 

(range 14.3 to 21.1cm). Diameter of longest internode 

central and perpendicular to bud is thin to medium with 

mean approximately 21.1mm (range 17.8 to 24.1mm). 

Diameter of longest internode central and dissecting bud is 

thin to medium with mean approximately 21.5mm (range 

17.9 to 24.3mm). Internodes are weakly conoidal shaped 

and round in cross-section. Colour of dewaxed internode is 

yellow-green (RHS 148A) exposed and greyed-yellow 

(RHS 160A) unexposed. Wax covering of internode is 

heavy, with wax band indistinct and medium in width. 

Growth cracks are absent. Cork cracks are absent. Bud 

groove is absent. Root band width on bud side is narrow to 

medium (7.5mm). Bud is of weak to medium prominence, 

ovate in shape, and with base near to leaf scar and tip level 

to the growth ring. Bud width excluding wings is medium 

to medium wide and bud wing is narrow to medium in 

width. Leaf scar is prominent and oblique descending 

towards bud. Growth ring is slightly swollen. Leaf: lamina 

of TVD leaf is medium in length with mean approximately 

1.40m (range 1.11 to 2.43m), medium with mean width 

approximately 40.3mm (range 27.7 to 48.2mm) at 

longitudinal midpoint, and curved near tip in attitude. 

Midrib of lamina at longitudinal midpoint is medium with 

mean 3.57mm (range 2.5 to 4.5mm). Lamina width to 

midrib width ratio is medium with mean approximately 

70



11.4 (range 9.3 to 17.0). Leaf sheath of TVD leaf is very 

long in length with mean length approximately 36.7cm 

(range 33.0 to 42.0cm). Sheath of senescent leaves have 

very weak to weak adherence to culm. Hairs on abaxial leaf 

sheath surface (Group 57) are absent. Ligule is 

crescentiform in shape and wide at midrib section. Cilia 

along the free margin of the ligule (Group 61) are dense and 

medium in length. Auricles are inconspicuous and 

symmetrical. Inner or underlapping auricle is transitional in 

shape. Outer or overlapping auricle is transitional in shape. 

Flowering: flower is an open panicle and flowering is 

discontinuous and sparse to medium. Seed: seed or fruit is 

a caryopsis. Disease resistance: very highly resistant to Fiji 

disease virus, highly resistant to Leaf Scald (Xanthomonas 

albilineans (Ashby) Dowson), intermediate to Red Rot 

(Glomerella tucumanensis (Spego) Arx and Mueller), 

susceptible to highly susceptible to Pachymetra Root Rot, 

and intermediate to sugarcane mosaic virus. Other 






(Gordonvale), QLD, between the female parent ‘75N1675’ 

and the male parent ‘Q121’. Seed was collected from the 


in 1988. ‘Q177’ is very highly resistant to Fiji Disease 

Virus, similar to its female parent ‘75N1675’, while its male 

parent ‘Q121’ is resistant to intermediate. ‘Q177’ is 

susceptible to highly susceptible to Pachymetra root rot, 

similar to ‘Q121’, while ‘75N1675’ has intermediate 

resistance. ‘Q177’ has been evaluated and selected by BSES 

in yield trials on the Burdekin Sugar Experiment Station 

and sites within the sugarcane growing area in the Burdekin 

region. Standard commercial varieties were also included in 

the trials for comparative purposes. Selection criteria: cane 

yield, commercial cane sugar (ccs), and sugar yield have 

been the main selection criteria. Disease resistance 

screening was conducted at the pathology farm (Eight Mile 

Plains) and in the Tully glasshouse. Propagation: after an 

initial seedling stage, all subsequent stages have involved 

vegetative propagation. Breeder: Bureau of Sugar 


Choice of Comparators ‘Q117’ and ‘Q165’ A were chosen 

as they are the most similar varieties of common knowledge 

grown in the Burdekin region. Together, these two varieties 

accounted for almost 40% (3.18 million t) of the Burdekin 

crop in 1998. The female parent ‘75N1675’ was excluded 

because it has intermediate resistance to Pachymetra Root 

Rot while ‘Q177’ is susceptible to highly susceptible. The 

male parent ‘Q121’ was excluded because it is resistant to 

intermediate to Fiji Disease Virus while ‘Q177’ is very 

highly resistant. Therefore, the parents were excluded. 

Comparative Trial Comparators: ‘Q117’, and ‘Q165’ A . 

Location: conducted at Central Sugar Experiment Station 

(21º 9′S, 149º 7′E), Te Kowai, QLD. The trial was planted 

22 Sep 1997, harvested on 9 Sep 1998 and ratooned. DUS 

data were recorded in early Jun 1999. Conditions: clones 

were propagated from vegetative cuttings and grown under 

field conditions. Soil type: Pioneer. Watering regime: flood 

irrigated. Chemicals: Lorsban (1 L/ha) was applied at 

planting and Gramoxin (1.2 L/ha) was used to control 

weeds in 1997, with a Diuron-Gramoxin mixture (0.5 

kg/ha) used in 1998. Fertilisers: Mackay Planter (340 kg/ha 

– N 10.6%, P 6.4%, K 22.0%, S 6.3%) was applied at 

planting; GF-525 (610 kg/ha – N 21.4%, P 1.5%, K 15.2%, 

S 7.3%) was applied in Nov 1998. Trial design: clones were 

grown in a randomised complete block design with three 

replicates. Plots were single row by 9m, with 1.5m between 

rows. Measurements: taken from up to 20 stalks sampled 

randomly per plot. 


First sold in Australia in June 1998. 



‘Q177’ *‘Q117’ *‘Q165’ A 

____________________________________________________ 

TILLERING 

many medium medium 

____________________________________________________ 

LEAF CANOPY 

heavy medium medium 

____________________________________________________ 


mean 2.59a 2.62a 2.77a 


medium medium tall 

____________________________________________________ 

ALIGNMENT OF INTERNODES – Zigzaggedness 

weak weak to weak to 

medium medium 

____________________________________________________ 


mean 17.3b 14.1a 16.9b 


medium very short medium 

to long to short 

____________________________________________________ 

INTERNODE LENGTH – Side Opposite Bud (cm) LSD 

(P ≤ 0.01) = 2.53 

mean 16.9b 13.7a 16.7b 


medium very short medium 

to long to short 

____________________________________________________ 

INTERNODE WIDTH – Central Perpendicular to Bud (mm) 

LSD (P ≤ 0.01) = 2.07 

mean 21.1a 25.2b 21.4a 


thin to thick thin to 

medium 

medium 

____________________________________________________ 

INTERNODE WIDTH – Central Dissecting Bud (mm) LSD 

(P ≤ 0.01) = 2.24 

mean 21.5a 25.9b 21.7a 


thin to thick thin to 

medium 

medium 

____________________________________________________ 


weakly tumescent weakly 

conoidal 

conoidal to 

weakly 

concave-convex 

____________________________________________________ 

71



round weakly oval weakly oval 

____________________________________________________ 


yellow-green yellow-green yellow-green 

(148A) (147B) (146B) 

____________________________________________________ 


greyed- greyed- greyedyellow 

yellow yellow 

(160A) (160A) (160B) 

____________________________________________________ 


heavy heavy to light-medium 

very heavy to medium 

____________________________________________________ 


indistinct indistinct medium 

to medium to distinct 

____________________________________________________ 

WAX BAND WIDTH 

medium narrow to medium 

medium 

____________________________________________________ 

GROWTH CRACKS 

absent absent to very few 

very few to few 

____________________________________________________ 

CORK CRACKS 

absent absent to absent 

very few 

____________________________________________________ 


absent 

inconspicuous inconspicuous 

to medium to medium 

____________________________________________________ 


n/a short to medium 

medium 

____________________________________________________ 

BUD GROOVE DEPTH 

n/a very shallow very shallow 

to shallow 

____________________________________________________ 

ROOT BAND WIDTH – bud side 

narrow to wide to very narrow 

medium very wide to narrow 

____________________________________________________ 

BUD – PROMINENCE 

weak to weak to weak 

medium medium 

____________________________________________________ 

BUD – SHAPE 

ovate oval to ovate ovate 

____________________________________________________ 


near near to near 

medium 

____________________________________________________ 


level level to level 

slightly above 

____________________________________________________ 


medium to narrow to medium 

medium-wide medium 

____________________________________________________ 

BUD WING WIDTH 

narrow to narrow narrow 

medium 

____________________________________________________ 


prominent medium to prominent 

prominent 

____________________________________________________ 

LEAF SCAR SLOPE 

oblique weakly weakly 

oblique oblique 

____________________________________________________ 

GROWTH RING 

slightly flush weakly depressed 

swollen 

to flush 

____________________________________________________ 


mean 1.40a 1.25a 1.28a 


medium short short to medium 

____________________________________________________ 

LAMINA WIDTH (Longitudinal Midpoint) (mm) LSD (P ≤ 

0.01) = 4.3 

mean 40.3b 39.9b 34.5a 


medium medium narrow 

____________________________________________________ 

MIDRIB WIDTH (Longitudinal Midpoint) (mm) LSD 

(P ≤ 0.01) = 0.5 

mean 3.6b 2.9a 2.8a 


medium narrow very narrow 

to narrow 

____________________________________________________ 


low medium medium 

to high 

____________________________________________________ 

LAMINA ATTITUDE 

curve curved weakly 

near tip to bent curved 

near tip near tip 

____________________________________________________ 


very weak weak to weak to 

to weak medium medium 

____________________________________________________ 


mean 36.8b 28.0a 29.3a 


very long short medium 

____________________________________________________ 


absent very sparse absent 

to sparse 

____________________________________________________ 


n/a very short n/a 

____________________________________________________ 

LIGULE SHAPE 

crescentiform deltoid deltoid 

____________________________________________________ 

LIGULE HEIGHT 

wide medium medium 

to wide 

____________________________________________________ 

72




dense medium very sparse 

____________________________________________________ 

AURICLE – PROMINENCE (Second Fully Unfurled Leaf) 

inconspicuous medium medium 

____________________________________________________ 


transitional lanceolate lanceolate 

____________________________________________________ 


transitional deltoid transitional 

____________________________________________________ 


n/a small to medium 

medium 

____________________________________________________ 


n/a very small n/a 

____________________________________________________ 

FLOWERING 

sparse to sparse to profuse 

medium medium 

____________________________________________________ 

Means followed by the same letter are not significantly different at 

P ≤ 0.01, Duncan’s Multiple Range Test 

‘Q178’ 



Indooroopilly, QLD 



hybrid. Plant: perennial grass with semi-erect to medium 

growth habit, medium tillers per stool. Leaf canopy is 

medium heavy. Suckers are very few to few in number. 

Stem: culms are medium to tall with mean length to top 

visible dewlap (TVD) approximately 2.87m (range 2.22 to 

3.44m). Alternate internodes of a culm are arranged in a 

aligned to weakly zigzagged pattern. Length of longest 

internode on bud side is long to very long with mean length 

approximately 21.7cm (range 15.9 to 27.8cm) and side 

opposite bud is long to very long with mean length 

approximately 21.4cm (range 15.5 to 27.0cm). Diameter of 

longest internode central and perpendicular to bud is 

medium with mean approximately 23.3mm (range 18.3 to 

27.6mm). Diameter of longest internode central and 

dissecting bud is medium to thick with mean approximately 

23.9mm (range 18.4 to 28.4mm). Internodes are very 

weakly conoidal shaped and weakly oval in cross-section. 

Colour of dewaxed internode is yellow-green (RHS 144A) 

exposed and yellow-green (RHS 144B to 144C) unexposed. 

Wax covering of internode is medium, with wax band 

medium distinct and wide. Growth cracks are absent. Cork 

cracks are very few. Bud groove is absent to inconspicuous. 

Root band width on bud side is medium to wide (7.3 to 

10.4mm). Bud is of weak to weak medium prominence, 

ovate in shape, and with base near to leaf scar and tip below 

to the growth ring. Bud width excluding wings is medium 

and bud wing is narrow to medium in width. Leaf scar 

prominence is medium and oblique descending towards 

bud. Growth ring is flush. Leaf: lamina of TVD leaf is very 

short to short in length with mean approximately 1.52m 

(range 1.27 to 1.68m), wide with mean width 


longitudinal midpoint, and curved near middle in attitude. 

Midrib of lamina at longitudinal midpoint is wide with 


width ratio is medium with mean approximately 10.9 (range 

8.5 to 14.2). Leaf sheath of TVD leaf is medium in length 

with mean length approximately 33.2 cm (range 28.0 to 

36.5 cm). Sheath of senescent leaves have weak adherence 

to culm. Hairs on abaxial leaf sheath surface (Group 57) are 

absent. Ligule is crescentiform in shape and wide at midrib 

section. Cilia along the free margin of the ligule (Group 61) 

are medium density and long in length. Auricles are of 

medium prominence and asymmetrical. Inner or 

underlapping auricle is lanceolate in shape and small in 

size. Outer or overlapping auricle is transitional in shape. 

Flowering: flower is an open panicle and flowering is 

discontinuous and sparse. Seed: seed or fruit is a caryopsis. 

Disease resistance: very highly resistant to Fiji disease 

virus, very highly to highly resistant to Leaf Scald 

(Xanthomonas albilineans (Ashby) Dowson), intermediate 

resistance to Red Rot (Glomerella tucumanensis (Spego) 

Arx and Mueller), very highly resistant to Pachymetra Root 

Rot, and highly resistant to sugarcane mosaic virus. Other 



short fibre 74.0%). ‘Q178 has resistance to sugarcane 

weevil borer (Rhabdoscelus obscurus) and good yield 

potential and ccs in areas where weevil borer is a problem. 




and the male parent ‘Q162’. Seed was collected from the 


in 1986. ‘Q178’ is very highly resistant to Fiji disease virus, 

as is the male parent ‘Q162’ while ‘63N1700’ is 

intermediate-susceptible to susceptible. ‘Q178’ is very 

highly resistant to Pachymetra Root Rot while ‘Q162’ is 

resistant-intermediate to susceptible . ‘Q178’ has been 

evaluated and selected by BSES in yield trials on the 

Meringa Sugar Experiment Station and sites within the 

sugarcane growing area in the northern region. Standard 


comparative purposes. A distinguishing feature of ‘Q178’ is 

its resistance to sugarcane weevil borer (Rhabdoscelus 

obscurus). It was released specifically because of its 

superior resistance and has been targeted for cultivation on 

the Mourilyan sands and other weevil borer problem areas. 

Selection criteria: cane yield, commercial cane sugar (ccs), 

and sugar yield have been the main selection criteria. 

Disease resistance screening was conducted at the 

pathology farm (Eight Mile Plains) and in the Tully 

glasshouse. Propagation; after an initial seedling stage, all 

subsequent stages have involved vegetative propagation. 

Breeder: Bureau of Sugar Experiment Stations, QLD. 

Choice of Comparators ‘Q135’ and ‘Q152’ were chosen, 


grown in north Queensland. ‘Q152’ accounted for almost 

13% (1.51 million t) of the north Queensland crop in 1998. 

Neither parent was included as a comparator. ‘Q162’ is far 

more susceptible to Pachymetra Root Rot than ‘Q178’. 

‘63N1700’ is susceptible to Fiji disease virus while ‘Q178’ 

is very highly resistant. 

73


Comparative Trial Comparators: ‘Q135’, and ‘Q152’. 

Location: conducted at Meringa Sugar Experiment 

Station (17º 12′S, 145º 45′E), Gordonvale, QLD. The trial 

was planted 26 Sep 1997, harvested on 3 Nov 1998 and 

ratooned. DUS data were recorded in early Jun 1999. 

Conditions: clones were propagated from vegetative 

cuttings and grown under field conditions. Soil type: 

white schist. Watering regime: rainfed. Chemicals: Aretan 

(400 ml/400 L) and suSCon (14 kg/ha). Fertilisers: DAP 

(120 kg/ha – N 21.6, P 24) at planting, Muriate of potash 

(200 kg/ha – K 100) and urea (180 kg/ha – N 83) on 1-2 

Dec 1997; CK50/50 (512 kg/ha – N 199, K 120) on 24 

Nov 1998. Trial design: clones were grown in a 

randomised complete block design with three replicates. 

Plots were single row by 9m, with 1.5m between rows. 

Measurements: taken from up to 20 stalks sampled 



First sold in Australia in Jul 1998. 



‘Q178’ *‘Q135’ *‘Q152’ 

____________________________________________________ 

GROWTH HABIT 

semi-erect to semi-erect erect to 

medium 

semi-erect 

____________________________________________________ 

TILLERING 


to many to many 

____________________________________________________ 

LEAF CANOPY 


to heavy 

to heavy 

____________________________________________________ 

SUCKERING 

very few few medium 

to few 

____________________________________________________ 


mean 2.87a 2.59a 2.87a 



to tall 

to tall 

____________________________________________________ 

ALIGNMENT OF INTERNODES – zigzaggedness 

aligned weak weak to 

to weak 

medium 

____________________________________________________ 


mean 21.7a 19.8a 19.9a 


long to medium medium 

very long to long to long 

____________________________________________________ 


(P ≤ 0.01) = 2.33 

mean 21.4a 19.6a 19.6a 


long to medium medium 

very long to long to long 

____________________________________________________ 


LSD (P ≤ 0.01) = 1.79 

mean 23.3a 22.6a 22.5a 


medium thin to thin to 

medium medium 

____________________________________________________ 


(P ≤ 0.01) = 1.91 

mean 23.9a 22.5a 23.4a 


medium thin thin to 

to thick 

medium 

____________________________________________________ 


very weakly bobbin concaveconoidal 

shaped convex 

____________________________________________________ 


weakly oval weakly oval oval 

____________________________________________________ 



(144A) (144A to (144A to 

152A) 146B) 

____________________________________________________ 



(144B to (144B to (151D to 

144C) 144C) 154C) 

____________________________________________________ 


medium light to medium to 

medium heavy 

____________________________________________________ 


medium distinct weakly 

distinct 

distinct 

____________________________________________________ 


wide medium medium to wide 

____________________________________________________ 

GROWTH CRACKS 

absent absent few 

____________________________________________________ 

CORK CRACKS 

very few absent few 

____________________________________________________ 


absent to inconspicuous absent 

inconspicuous 

____________________________________________________ 


n/a short to n/a 

medium 

____________________________________________________ 


very shallow shallow to n/a 

medium 

____________________________________________________ 


medium narrow wide to 

to wide 

very wide 

____________________________________________________ 


weak to weak very weak 

weak-medium 

____________________________________________________ 

74



BUD – SHAPE 

ovate oval to ovate 

triangular 

pointed 

____________________________________________________ 


near high medium 

____________________________________________________ 


below level to below 

above 

____________________________________________________ 


medium narrow wide to 

very wide 

____________________________________________________ 


narrow to narrow to very narrow 

medium medium 

____________________________________________________ 


medium medium prominent 

____________________________________________________ 


mean 1.52a 1.65b 1.57ab 


very short medium short to 

to short to long medium 

____________________________________________________ 

LAMINA WIDTH (Longitudinal Midpoint) (mm) LSD 

(P ≤ 0.01) = 5.3 

mean 46.1b 41.9ab 35.8a 


wide medium very narrow 

to narrow 

____________________________________________________ 


(P ≤ 0.01) = 0.5 

mean 4.3b 3.7a 3.5a 


wide narrow very narrow 

to narrow 

____________________________________________________ 


medium high low to 

medium 

____________________________________________________ 


curve near curve near curve near 

middle tip middle 

____________________________________________________ 


weak weak weak to 

medium 

____________________________________________________ 


mean 33.2a 31.4a 30.9a 


medium short very short 

to short 

____________________________________________________ 


absent absent sparse 

____________________________________________________ 


n/a n/a very short 

____________________________________________________ 

LIGULE SHAPE 

crescentiform deltoid deltoid 

____________________________________________________ 

LIGULE HEIGHT 

wide medium wide 

____________________________________________________ 


medium dense dense 

____________________________________________________ 


medium medium to medium to 

prominent prominent 

____________________________________________________ 


lanceolate lanceolate deltoid 

____________________________________________________ 


small medium small 

to large 

____________________________________________________ 

FLOWERING 

sparse medium sparse 

to profuse 

____________________________________________________ 

Means followed by the same letter are not significantly different at P ≤ 

0.01, Duncan’s Multiple Range Test 

‘Q179’ 






hybrid. Plant: perennial grass with semi-erect to medium 

growth habit, medium to many tillers per stool. Leaf canopy 

is medium. Suckers are few in number. Stem: culms are 

medium to tall with mean length to top visible dewlap 

(TVD) approximately 2.85m (range 2.37 to 3.40 m). 

Alternate internodes of a culm are arranged in a weakly 

zigzagged pattern. Length of longest internode on bud side 

is very long with mean length approximately 23.6cm (range 

19.4 to 29.8cm) and side opposite bud is very long with 

mean length approximately 23.1cm (range 19.0 to 29.5cm). 

Diameter of longest internode central and perpendicular to 

bud is medium to thick with mean approximately 23.7mm 

(range 15.4 to 28.3mm). Diameter of longest internode 

central and dissecting bud is medium to thick with mean 

approximately 23.8mm (range 15.2 to 28.6mm). Internodes 

are cylindrical to conoidal and round in cross-section. 

Colour of dewaxed internode is yellow-green (RHS 146A) 

to greyed-orange (RHS 166A) exposed and greyed-yellow 

(RHS 160A) unexposed. Wax covering of internode is light, 

with wax band distinct and narrow to medium in width. 

Growth cracks are few. Cork cracks are few. Bud groove is 

inconspicuous and very short in length and very shallow. 

Root band width on bud side is medium (7.5 to 9.0mm). 

Bud is of weak prominence, ovate in shape, and with base 

near to leaf scar and tip below the growth ring. Bud width 

excluding wings is very narrow to narrow and bud wing is 

medium to wide in width. Leaf scar is prominent and 

oblique descending towards bud. Growth ring is variable. 

Leaf: lamina of TVD leaf is long in length with mean 

approximately 1.69m (range 1.47 to 1.89m), medium to 

wide in width with mean approximately 45.1mm (range 

34.2 to 52.9mm) at longitudinal midpoint, and curved near 

75


middle in attitude. Midrib of lamina at longitudinal 

midpoint is medium in width with mean 3.9mm (range 2.9 

to 4.7mm). Lamina width to midrib width ratio is high with 

mean approximately 11.6 (range 9.3 to 14.5). Leaf sheath of 

TVD leaf is medium with mean length approximately 

33.2cm (range 30.0 to 36.5cm). Sheath of senescent leaves 

have weak adherence to culm. Hairs on abaxial leaf sheath 

surface (Group 57) are very sparse and very short. Ligule is 

crescentiform in shape and medium at midrib section. Cilia 

along the free margin of the ligule (Group 61) are dense to 

very dense and very short. Auricles are of medium 

prominence and asymmetrical. Inner or underlapping 

auricle is deltoid in shape and small in size. Outer or 

overlapping auricle is transitional in shape. Flowering: 

flower is an open panicle and flowering is discontinuous 

and medium. Seed: seed or fruit is a caryopsis. Disease 

resistance: highly resistant to intermediate to Fiji disease 

virus, very highly resistant to resistant to Leaf Scald 

(Xanthomonas albilineans (Ashby) Dowson), resistant to 

intermediate to Red Rot (Glomerella tucumanensis (Spego) 

Arx and Mueller), intermediate to susceptible to 

Pachymetra Root Rot. Other characteristics: Fibre quantity 

and quality are acceptable for milling purposes (impact 

reading 0.44, shear strength 29.0, short fibre 68.0%). 




and the male parent ‘66N2008’. Seed was collected from 

the pollinated female inflorescence and stored for 

germination in 1978. ‘Q179’ is highly resistant to 

intermediate to Fiji disease virus while ‘58N829’ is 

susceptible and ‘66N2008’ is very highly resistant. ‘Q179’ 

has been evaluated and selected by BSES in yield trials on 

the Meringa Sugar Experiment Station and sites within the 

sugarcane growing area in the Herbert region. Standard 







stage, all subsequent stages have involved vegetative 

propagation. Breeder: Bureau of Sugar Experiment 

Stations, QLD. 

Choice of Comparators ‘Q115’ and ‘Q120’ were chosen 


grown in the Herbert region. ‘Q115’ accounted for over 

13% (0.56 million t) of the Herbert region crop in 1998. 

‘Q120’ is a major variety in north Queensland (1.5 million t 

in 1998) and has recently been released in the Herbert 

region. Neither parent was included as a comparator. 

‘58N829 is susceptible and ‘66N2008’ is very highly 

resistant to Fiji disease virus while ‘Q179’ is highly 

resistant to intermediate. 

Comparative Trial Comparators: ‘Q115’ and ‘Q120’. 

Location: conducted at Meringa Sugar Experiment Station 

(17º 12′S, 145º 45′E), Gordonvale, QLD. The trial was 

planted 26 Sep 1997, harvested on 3 Nov 1998 and 



cuttings and grown under field conditions. Soil type: white 

schist. Watering regime: rainfed. Chemicals: Aretan (400 

ml/400 L) and suSCon (14 kg/ha). Fertilisers: DAP (120 

kg/ha – N 21.6, P 24) at planting, Muriate of potash (200 

kg/ha – K 100) and urea (180 kg/ha – N 83) on 1-2 Dec 

1997; CK50/50 (512 kg/ha – N 199, K 120) on 24 Nov 

1998. Trial design: Clones were grown in a randomised 


single row by 9 m, with 1.5 m between rows. 







‘Q179’ *‘Q115’ *‘Q120’ 

____________________________________________________ 

GROWTH HABIT 

semi-erect to erect to erect 

medium semi-erect 

____________________________________________________ 

TILLERING 

medium few to medium 

to many medium 

____________________________________________________ 

LEAF CANOPY 

medium medium light 

____________________________________________________ 

SUCKERING 

few very few very few 

to few to few 

____________________________________________________ 


mean 2.85b 2.46a 2.46a 


medium short to short to 

to tall medium medium 

____________________________________________________ 


mean 23.6b 19.2a 18.7a 


very long medium short to 

medium 

____________________________________________________ 

INTERNODE LENGTH – Side Opposite Bud (cm) LSD (P ≤ 

0.01) = 2.33 

mean 23.1b 19.0a 18.4a 


very long medium short to 

medium 

____________________________________________________ 


LSD (P ≤ 0.01) = 1.79 

mean 23.7a 21.7a 23.2a 


medium very thin medium 

to thick to thin 

____________________________________________________ 


(P ≤ 0.01) = 1.91 

mean 23.8a 22.1a 22.8a 


medium thin thin to 

to thick 

medium 

____________________________________________________ 

76




cylindrical bobbin bobbin shaped 

to conoidal shaped to 

concave-convex 

____________________________________________________ 


round round oval 

____________________________________________________ 


yellow-green greyed- yellow-green 

(146A) to orange (165A)(152A to 144A) 

greyed-orange 

(166A) 

____________________________________________________ 


greyed- greyed- yellow (10B) to 

yellow (160A)yellow (160A)yellow-green 

(152D) 

____________________________________________________ 


light medium medium 

____________________________________________________ 


distinct distinct indistinct to 

indistinctmedium 

____________________________________________________ 


narrow to medium wide to 

medium to wide very wide 

____________________________________________________ 

GROWTH CRACKS 

few absent absent 

____________________________________________________ 

CORK CRACKS 

few very few very few 

____________________________________________________ 


inconspicuous absent absent 

____________________________________________________ 


very short n/a n/a 

____________________________________________________ 


very shallow n/a n/a 

____________________________________________________ 


medium narrow to wide 

medium 

____________________________________________________ 



____________________________________________________ 

BUD – SHAPE 

ovate ovate round to ovate 

____________________________________________________ 


near medium near 

to high 

____________________________________________________ 


below level slightly below 

____________________________________________________ 


very narrow medium very wide 

to narrow 

____________________________________________________ 


medium narrow wide 

to wide 

____________________________________________________ 

GROWTH RING 

depressed, depressed flush 

flush, swollen 

____________________________________________________ 


mean 1.69a 1.62a 1.71a 


long medium long to very long 

____________________________________________________ 


(P ≤ 0.01) = 5.3 

mean 45.1b 43.4ab 37.5a 


medium medium narrow 

to wide 

____________________________________________________ 


(P ≤ 0.01) = 0.5 

mean 3.9a 4.0a 3.8a 


medium medium narrow to 

medium 

____________________________________________________ 


high medium low 

____________________________________________________ 



middle middle middle 

____________________________________________________ 


weak weak to medium to 

medium strong 

____________________________________________________ 


mean 33.2a 32.6a 34.7a 


medium short to medium 

medium to long 

____________________________________________________ 


very sparse absent absent 

____________________________________________________ 


very short n/a n/a 

____________________________________________________ 


dense to dense medium 

very dense 

____________________________________________________ 


medium inconspicuous medium 

____________________________________________________ 


deltoid transitional lanceolate 

____________________________________________________ 


small n/a small 

____________________________________________________ 

FLOWERING 

medium sparse to sparse to 

medium medium 

____________________________________________________ 


P ≤ 0.01, Duncan’s Multiple Range Test. 

77


‘Q180’ 






hybrid. Plant: perennial grass with erect to semi-erect 

growth habit, few to medium tillers per stool. Leaf canopy 

is light to medium. Suckers are very few to few in number. 

Stem: culms are medium in height with mean length to top 

visible dewlap (TVD) approximately 2.58m (range 1.73 to 

3.07m). Alternate internodes of a culm are arranged in a 

weakly zigzagged pattern. Length of longest internode on 

bud side is short with mean length approximately 17.5cm 

(range 14.3 to 21.8cm) and side opposite bud is very short 

to short with mean length approximately 17.2cm (range 

13.9 to 21.6cm). Diameter of longest internode central and 

perpendicular to bud is medium with mean approximately 

23.5mm (range 19.1 to 27.7mm). Diameter of longest 

internode central and dissecting bud is medium to thick 

with mean approximately 23.8mm (range 19.0 to 28.3mm). 

Internodes are strongly bobbin shaped and round in crosssection. 

Colour of dewaxed internode is yellow-green (RHS 

144A to 152A) exposed and yellow-green (RHS 151A to 

144C) unexposed. Wax covering of internode is light to 

medium, with wax band distinct and narrow. Growth cracks 

are absent. Cork cracks are medium. Bud groove is absent. 

Root band width on bud side is narrow to medium (7.1 to 

7.5mm). Bud is of weak to medium prominence, ovate to 

pentagonal in shape, and with base near to leaf scar and tip 

above the growth ring. Bud width excluding wings is wide 

to very wide and bud wing is wide in width. Leaf scar is 

prominent and oblique descending towards bud. Growth 

ring is depressed. Leaf: lamina of TVD leaf is medium to 

long in length with mean approximately 1.66m (range 1.05 

to 1.92m), medium in width with mean approximately 

42.9mm (range 29.1 to 53.4mm) at longitudinal midpoint, 

and curved near middle in attitude. Midrib of lamina at 

longitudinal midpoint is narrow to medium in width with 


width ratio is high with mean approximately 11.5 (range 8.0 

to 15.6). Leaf sheath of TVD leaf is medium to long with 

mean length approximately 33.9cm (range 28.0 to 46.0cm). 

Sheath of senescent leaves have medium adherence to culm. 

Hairs on abaxial leaf sheath surface (Group 57) are dense 

and long. Ligule is deltoid in shape and medium at midrib 

section. Cilia along the free margin of the ligule (Group 61) 

are of medium density and short to medium in length. 

Auricles are inconspicuous and asymmetrical. Inner or 

underlapping auricle is deltoid in shape and small to 

medium in size. Outer or overlapping auricle is transitional 

in shape. Flowering: flower is an open panicle and 

flowering is discontinuous and medium. Seed: seed or fruit 

is a caryopsis. Disease resistance: very highly susceptible to 

Fiji disease virus, very highly resistant to Leaf Scald 


resistance to Red Rot (Glomerella tucumanensis (Spego) 

Arx and Mueller), intermediate to intermediate-susceptible 

to Pachymetra Root Rot, and highly resistant to sugarcane 

mosaic virus. Other characteristics: Fibre quantity and 

quality are acceptable for milling purposes (impact reading 

0.69, shear strength 28.0, short fibre 64.0%). 




and the male parent ‘CO1007’. Seed was collected from the 


in 1988. ‘Q180’ is very highly susceptible to Fiji Disease 

Virus while ‘67N3184’ is intermediate and ‘CO1007’ is 

resistant. ‘Q180’ is intermediate to intermediate-susceptible 

to Pachymetra root rot, similar to ‘67N3184’, while 

‘CO1007’ is resistant to intermediate, ‘Q180’ has been 

evaluated and selected by BSES in yield trials on the 

Burdekin Sugar Experiment Station and sites within the 

sugarcane growing area in the Burdekin region. Standard 










Choice of Comparators ‘Q117’ and ‘Q165’ A were chosen, 


grown in the Burdekin region. Together, these two varieties 

accounted for almost 40% (3.18 million t) of the Burdekin 

crop in 1998. Neither parent was included as a comparator. 

Both parents can be distinguished from the candidate on the 

basis of resistance to Fiji disease. ‘67N3184’ has 

intermediate resistance and ‘CO1007’ is resistant to Fiji 

Disease, while ‘Q180’ is very highly susceptible. 

Comparative Trial Comparators: ‘Q117’, and ‘Q165 A ’. 


(17º 12′ S, 145º 45′ E), Gordonvale, QLD. The trial was 










1998; Trial design: Clones were grown in a randomised 






First sold in Australia in Jun 1998. 


78




‘Q180’ *‘Q117’ *‘Q165’ A 

____________________________________________________ 

TILLERING 

few to medium few to 

medium 

medium 

____________________________________________________ 

LEAF CANOPY 

light to medium light 

medium to heavy 

____________________________________________________ 

SUCKERING 

very few very few very few 

to few 

to few 

____________________________________________________ 


mean 2.58a 2.45a 2.53a 


medium short medium 

____________________________________________________ 



____________________________________________________ 


mean 17.5a 16.0a 18.3a 


short very short short to 

medium 

____________________________________________________ 


(P ≤ 0.01) = 2.33 

mean 17.2a 15.6a 17.9a 


very short very short short 

to short 

____________________________________________________ 


LSD (P ≤ 0.01) = 1.79 

mean 23.5a 26.1b 21.9a 


medium very thick thin 

____________________________________________________ 


(P ≤ 0.01) = 1.91 

mean 23.8a 26.9b 22.2a 


medium very thick thin 

to thick 

____________________________________________________ 


strongly cylindrical concavebobbin 

to bobbin convex 

shaped shaped 

____________________________________________________ 


round weakly oval oval 

____________________________________________________ 



(144A to (152A) to (152A to 

152A) to greyed- 144A) to 

orange greyed- 

(165A) orange (177A) 

____________________________________________________ 


yellow-green yellow-green yellow (10B) to 

(151A to (152B to yellow-green 

144C) 152D) (145A) 

____________________________________________________ 


light to heavy medium to 

medium 

heavy 

____________________________________________________ 


distinct indistinct distinct 

____________________________________________________ 


narrow narrow medium to wide 

____________________________________________________ 

GROWTH CRACKS 

absent absent to absent 

very few 

____________________________________________________ 

CORK CRACKS 

medium very few absent 

to few 

____________________________________________________ 


absent medium inconspicuous 

____________________________________________________ 


narrow to narrow to very narrow 

medium medium to narrow 

____________________________________________________ 


weak to very weak weak 

medium 

____________________________________________________ 

BUD – SHAPE 

ovate to oval to triangular 

pentagonal triangular pointed 

pointed 

____________________________________________________ 



____________________________________________________ 


above above level to above 

____________________________________________________ 


wide to narrow to very narrow 

very wide medium to narrow 

____________________________________________________ 


wide narrow to narrow to 

medium medium 

____________________________________________________ 


prominent prominent medium 

____________________________________________________ 

GROWTH RING 

depressed flush flush 

____________________________________________________ 


mean 1.66a 1.56a 1.56a 


medium short short 

to long 

____________________________________________________ 

79



(P ≤ 0.01) = 5.3 

mean 42.9b 42.8b 35.0a 


medium medium very narrow 

____________________________________________________ 


(P ≤ 0.01) = 0.5 

mean 3.8ab 4.0b 3.4a 


narrow to medium very narrow 

medium 

to narrow 

____________________________________________________ 


high medium low to medium 

____________________________________________________ 



middle middle middle 

____________________________________________________ 


medium weak to weak 

medium 

____________________________________________________ 


mean 33.9b 28.2a 31.6b 


medium very short short 

to long 

____________________________________________________ 


dense dense absent 

____________________________________________________ 


long medium long n/a 

____________________________________________________ 


medium dense sparse to medium 

____________________________________________________ 


inconspicuous medium to medium 

prominent 

____________________________________________________ 


deltoid deltoid to lanceolate 

dentoid 

____________________________________________________ 


transitional lanceolate transitional 

____________________________________________________ 


small to medium small to 

medium 

medium 

____________________________________________________ 


n/a medium n/a 

____________________________________________________ 

FLOWERING 

medium sparse to profuse 

medium 

____________________________________________________ 


P ≤ 0.01, Duncan’s Multiple Range Test 

‘Q181’ 






hybrid. Plant: perennial grass with semi-prostrate growth 

habit, few to medium tillers per stool. Leaf canopy is light 

to medium. Suckers are very few in number. Stem: culms 

are medium to tall with mean length to top visible dewlap 

(TVD) approximately 2.85 m (range 2.32 to 3.18m). 

Alternate internodes of a culm are arranged in a medium to 

strongly zigzagged pattern. Length of longest internode on 

bud side is medium to long with mean length approximately 

20.0cm (range 16.4 to 25.0cm) and side opposite bud is 

medium to long with mean length approximately 19.7cm 

(range 15.3 to 25.0cm). Diameter of longest internode 

central and perpendicular to bud is thick to very thick with 

mean approximately 25.0mm (range 19.7 to 29.6mm). 

Diameter of longest internode central and dissecting bud is 

thick to very thick with mean approximately 25.8 mm 

(range 19.6 to 30.7 mm). Internodes are cylindrical to 

bobbin shaped and weakly oval in cross-section. Colour of 

dewaxed internode is yellow-green (RHS 144A) exposed 

and yellow-green (RHS 145B) unexposed. Wax covering of 

internode is medium, with wax band distinct and medium to 

wide. Growth cracks are absent to very few. Cork cracks are 

absent. Bud groove presence is medium and medium in 

length and deep. Root band width on bud side is medium. 

Bud is of weak prominence, triangular pointed in shape, and 

with base medium to leaf scar and tip above the growth ring. 

Bud width excluding wings is narrow to medium and bud 

wing is medium to wide in width. Leaf scar is medium to 


ring is weakly swollen. Leaf: Lamina of TVD leaf is 

medium in length with mean approximately 1.64m (range 

1.50 to 1.86m), wide to very wide in width with mean 

approximately 48.4mm (range 39.3 to 54.4mm) at 


Midrib of lamina at longitudinal midpoint is medium in 

width with mean 3.9mm (range 3.4 to 4.9mm). Lamina 

width to midrib width ratio is very high with mean 

approximately 12.3 (range 9.5 to 14). Leaf sheath of TVD 

leaf is short to medium with mean length approximately 

32.6cm (range 29.0 to 35.5cm). Sheaths of senescent leaves 


surface (Group 57) are absent. Ligule is deltoid in shape and 

wide at midrib section. Cilia along the free margin of the 

ligule (Group 61) are of sparse density and medium in 

length. Auricles are of medium prominence and 

asymmetrical. Inner or underlapping auricle is lanceolate in 

shape and medium in size. Outer or overlapping auricle is 

lanceolate in shape and small in size. Flowering: flower is 

an open panicle and flowering is discontinuous and sparse 

to medium. Seed: seed or fruit is a caryopsis. Disease 

resistance: very highly resistant to Fiji disease virus, highly 

resistant to resistant to Leaf Scald (Xanthomonas 

albilineans (Ashby) Dowson), intermediate resistance to 


Mueller), resistant to intermediate to Pachymetra Root Rot, 

and highly resistant to sugarcane mosaic virus. Other 

characteristics: Fibre quantity and quality are acceptable for 



80






and the male parent ‘66N2008’. Seed was collected from 


germination in 1986. ‘Q181’ and ‘66N2008’ are very highly 

resistant to Fiji disease virus while ‘75N1649’ is resistant. 

‘Q181’ has intermediate resistance to red rot while 

‘66N2008’ is highly susceptible. ‘Q181’ has been evaluated 

and selected by BSES in yield trials on the Meringa Sugar 

Experiment Station and sites within the sugarcane growing 

area in the northern region. Standard commercial varieties 

were also included in the trials for comparative purposes. 





glasshouse. Propagation: after an initial seedling stage 

(using seed from the cross), all subsequent stages have 

involved vegetative propagation. Breeder: Bureau of Sugar 


Choice of Comparators ‘H56-752’ and ‘Q138’ were 

chosen, as they are most similar varieties of common 

knowledge grown in north Queensland. ‘Q138’ is a major 

variety in north Queensland, accounting for almost 14% of 

the crop in 1998 (1.07 million t). ‘H56-752’ is a minor 

variety (0.7%, 77,000 t). Both parents were excluded as 

comparators. They can be distinguished from the candidate 

on the basis of disease resistance. ‘75N1649’ is not as 

resistant to Fiji disease virus as ‘Q181’ , while ‘66N2008’ is 

more susceptible to red rot and Pachymetra root rot. 

Comparative Trial Comparators: ‘H56-752’ and ‘Q138’. 


(17º 12′ S, 145º 45′ E), Gordonvale, QLD. The trial was 










1998. Trial design: Clones were grown in a randomised 









‘Q181’ *‘H56-752’ *‘Q138’ 

____________________________________________________ 

GROWTH HABIT 

semi- medium medium to 

prostrate to semi- semiprostrate 

prostrate 

____________________________________________________ 

TILLERING 

few to medium many 

medium 

____________________________________________________ 

LEAF CANOPY 

light to light heavy to 

medium 

very heavy 

____________________________________________________ 

SUCKERING 

very few many to few to 

very many medium 

____________________________________________________ 


mean 2.85ab 3.08b 2.56a 


medium tall to medium 

to tall very tall 

____________________________________________________ 



medium 

____________________________________________________ 


mean 20.0a 19.3a 21.0a 



to long 

____________________________________________________ 


(P ≤ 0.01) = 2.33 

mean 19.7a 18.8a 20.7a 



to long 

____________________________________________________ 


LSD (P ≤ 0.01) = 1.79 

mean 25.0b 23.6ab 22.1a 


thick to medium thin 

very thick to thick 

____________________________________________________ 


(P ≤ 0.01) = 1.91 

mean 25.8b 23.7ab 22.0a 


thick to medium thin 

very thick 

____________________________________________________ 


cylindrical bobbin weakly bobbin 

to bobbin shaped shaped to 

shaped 

conoidal 

____________________________________________________ 


weakly oval round round 

____________________________________________________ 

81




(144A) (144A to (144A) 

144B to 164C) 

____________________________________________________ 



(145B) (144C) (151D) 

____________________________________________________ 


medium heavy very light 

____________________________________________________ 


distinct indistinct distinct 

____________________________________________________ 


medium very narrow medium 

to wide to narrow to wide 

____________________________________________________ 

GROWTH CRACKS 

absent to absent absent 

very few 

____________________________________________________ 


medium medium inconspicuous 

____________________________________________________ 


medium long very short 

____________________________________________________ 


deep medium shallow 

to deep 

____________________________________________________ 



to wide 

____________________________________________________ 


medium medium weak to 

medium 

____________________________________________________ 

BUD – SHAPE 

triangular ovate ovate to 

pointed 

rhomboid 

____________________________________________________ 


above level to below 

above 

____________________________________________________ 


narrow to wide medium 

medium 

____________________________________________________ 



to wide 

medium 

____________________________________________________ 


medium to medium medium to 

prominent 

prominent 

____________________________________________________ 


oblique oblique oblique 

____________________________________________________ 

GROWTH RING 

weakly swollen flush to 

swollen 

swollen 

____________________________________________________ 


mean 1.64a 1.69a 1.65a 


medium long medium to long 

____________________________________________________ 

LAMINA WIDTH (Longitudinal Midpoint) (mm) LSD (P ≤ 

0.01) = 5.3 

mean 48.4b 39.7a 46.7b 


wide to narrow to wide 

very wide medium 

____________________________________________________ 


(P ≤ 0.01) = 0.5 

mean 3.9a 3.4a 4.5b 


medium very narrow very wide 

to narrow 

____________________________________________________ 


very high high low to medium 

____________________________________________________ 



tip middle middle 

____________________________________________________ 



____________________________________________________ 


mean 32.6a 30.6a 32.4a 


short to very short short to 

medium to short medium 

____________________________________________________ 


absent sparse sparse 

____________________________________________________ 

LIGULE HEIGHT 

wide medium wide 

____________________________________________________ 


sparse medium medium dense 

____________________________________________________ 


lanceolate transitional deltoid 

____________________________________________________ 


medium medium small 

to large 

____________________________________________________ 


small n/a small 

____________________________________________________ 

FLOWERING 

sparse to very sparse very sparse 

medium 

____________________________________________________ 


0.01, Duncan’s Multiple Range Test. 

82



‘Q182’ 






hybrid. Plant: perennial grass with medium growth habit, 

medium tillers per stool. Leaf canopy is light. Suckers are 

very few in number. Stem: culms are short to medium with 

mean length to top visible dewlap (TVD) approximately 

2.38 m (range 1.93 to 2.84m). Alternate internodes of a 

culm are arranged in a strongly zigzagged pattern. Length 

of longest internode on bud side is very long with mean 

length approximately 25.1cm (range 18.0 to 29.2cm) and 

side opposite bud is very long with mean length 

approximately 24.9cm (range 17.8 to 28.8cm). Diameter of 

longest internode central and perpendicular to bud is thin to 

medium with mean approximately 20.9mm (range 13.8 to 


dissecting bud is thin to medium with mean approximately 

21.9mm (range 13.7 to 28.5mm). Internodes are cylindrical 

to weakly concave-convex shaped and oval in cross-section. 

Colour of dewaxed internode is yellow-green (RHS 146C) 

exposed and yellow-green (RHS 145B) unexposed. Wax 

covering of internode is medium, with wax band indistinct 

to medium and narrow. Growth cracks are numerous. Cork 

cracks are few to few-medium. Bud groove is 

inconspicuous to medium in prominence, medium-long to 

long in length and shallow to shallow-medium in depth. 

Root band width on bud side is wide (10.0 to 12.0mm). Bud 

is of weak to weak-medium prominence, pentagonal in 

shape, and with base near to leaf scar and tip below the 

growth ring. Bud width excluding wings is medium and bud 

wing is medium-wide to wide in width. Leaf scar is 


ring is weakly depressed to flush. Leaf: lamina of TVD leaf 

is medium in length with mean approximately 1.43m (range 

0.90 to 1.75m), medium to wide in width with mean 


longitudinal midpoint, and curved near middle in attitude. 

Midrib of lamina at longitudinal midpoint is medium in 

width with mean 3.7mm (range 1.2 to 4.8mm). Lamina 

width to midrib width ratio is low to medium with mean 

approximately 12.1 (range 6.7 to 24.8). Leaf sheath of TVD 

leaf is medium with mean length approximately 30.4cm 

(range 25.0 to 36.0cm). Sheath of senescent leaves have 

weak adherence to culm. Hairs on abaxial leaf sheath 

surface (Group 57) are medium to dense and long. Ligule is 

deltoid in shape and medium at midrib section. Cilia along 

the free margin of the ligule (Group 61) are of mediumdense 

to dense density and very short to short in length. 

Auricles are medium in conspicuousness and asymmetrical. 

Inner or underlapping auricle is lanceolate in shape and 

medium in size. Outer or overlapping auricle is deltoid in 

shape and small to medium in size. Flowering: flower is an 

open panicle and flowering is discontinuous and profuse. 

Seed: seed or fruit is a caryopsis. Disease resistance: 

resistant to Fiji disease virus, resistant to Leaf Scald 

(Xanthomonas albilineans (Ashby) Dowson), resistant to 


Mueller), intermediate to Pachymetra Root Rot, and 

resistant to sugarcane mosaic virus. Other characteristics: 

Fibre quantity and quality are acceptable for milling 

purposes (impact reading 0.63, shear strength 28.7, short 

fibre 59.3%). 



(Gordonvale), QLD, between the female parent ‘RK65- 

122’ and the male parent ‘L62-68’. Seed was collected from 


germination in 1983. ‘Q182’ is resistant (3) to Fiji disease 

virus while ‘RK65-122’ is very highly resistant and ‘L62- 

68’ has intermediate resistant. ‘Q182’ has been evaluated 

and selected by BSES in yield trials on the Southern Sugar 

Experiment Station and sites within the sugarcane growing 

area in the southern region. Standard commercial varieties 

were also included in the trials for comparative purposes. 





glasshouse. Propagation: after an initial seedling stage, all 

subsequent stages have involved vegetative propagation. 

Breeder: Bureau of Sugar Experiment Stations, QLD. 

Choice of Comparators ‘Q136’ and ‘Q138’ were chosen, 

as they are most similar varieties of common knowledge 

grown in south Queensland. Together, these two varieties 

accounted for 10.8% (0.64 million t) of the south 

Queensland crop in 1998. Neither parent was included as a 

comparator. Both parents can be distinguished from the 

candidate on the basis of resistance to Fiji disease. ‘RK65- 

122’ is more resistant and ‘L62-68’ less resistant to Fiji 

disease virus than ‘Q182’. 

Comparative Trial Comparators: ‘Q136’, and ‘Q138’. 


(21º 9′ S, 149º 7′ E), Te Kowai, QLD. The trial was planted 

















First sold in Australia in Mar 1999. 


83



‘Q182’ *‘Q136’ *‘Q138’ 

____________________________________________________ 

GROWTH HABIT 

medium medium semi-erect 

____________________________________________________ 

LEAF CANOPY 

light light to medium 

medium 

____________________________________________________ 

SUCKERING 

very few few to very few 

medium 

to few 

____________________________________________________ 


mean 2.38a 2.40a 2.73a 


short to short to medium 

medium medium to tall 

____________________________________________________ 


strong strong weak to 

medium 

____________________________________________________ 


mean 25.1b 18.6a 17.5a 


very long long medium long 

____________________________________________________ 


(P ≤ 0.01) = 2.53 

mean 24.9b 18.3a 17.4a 


very long long medium long 

____________________________________________________ 


LSD (P ≤ 0.01) = 2.07 

mean 20.9a 20.3a 23.6b 


thin to thin medium 

medium 

____________________________________________________ 


(P ≤ 0.01) = 2.24 

mean 21.9ab 20.4a 23.9b 


thin to thin medium to 

medium 

thick 

____________________________________________________ 


cylindrical cylindrical conoidal 

to weakly to weakly 

concavebobbin 

convex shaped 

____________________________________________________ 


oval round round 

____________________________________________________ 



(146C) (144A) (144A) 

____________________________________________________ 


yellow-green yellow-green greyed-yellow 

(145B) (145C to (160A) 

150D) 

____________________________________________________ 


medium medium to light-medium 

medium- to medium 

heavy 

____________________________________________________ 


indistinct medium distinct 

to medium to distinct 

____________________________________________________ 


narrow medium medium 

to wide 

____________________________________________________ 

GROWTH CRACKS 

numerous absent few-medium to 

medium 

____________________________________________________ 

CORK CRACKS 

few to very few few 

few-medium 

____________________________________________________ 


inconspicuous absent medium 

to medium 

____________________________________________________ 


medium- n/a medium to 

long to long 

medium-long 

____________________________________________________ 


shallow to n/a shallow 

shallowmedium 

____________________________________________________ 


wide medium medium 

____________________________________________________ 


weak to medium medium 

weak-medium 

____________________________________________________ 

BUD – SHAPE 

pentagonal round oval to ovate 

____________________________________________________ 



____________________________________________________ 


below slightly below slightly below 

____________________________________________________ 



medium 

____________________________________________________ 


medium- medium to narrow to 

wide to wide medium-wide medium 

____________________________________________________ 


prominent medium medium 

____________________________________________________ 


oblique weakly level to very 

oblique weakly oblique 

____________________________________________________ 

84



GROWTH RING 

weakly swollen swollen 

depressed 

to flush 

____________________________________________________ 


mean 1.43a 1.40a 1.48a 


medium medium medium to long 

____________________________________________________ 


(P ≤ 0.01) = 4.3 

mean 41.9a 41.7a 49.4b 


medium medium wide to 

to wide 

very wide 

____________________________________________________ 


(P ≤ 0.01) = 0.5 

mean 3.7b 3.1a 4.4c 


medium narrow to very wide 

medium 

____________________________________________________ 


low to medium low 

medium to high 

____________________________________________________ 


curve near curve near bent near 

middle tip tip 

____________________________________________________ 


weak weak to weak to 

medium medium 

____________________________________________________ 


mean 30.4a 31.9a 30.1a 



to long 

____________________________________________________ 


medium medium sparse 

to dense 

____________________________________________________ 


long short short to 

short-medium 

____________________________________________________ 

LIGULE SHAPE 

deltoid deltoid to deltoid 

crescentiform 

____________________________________________________ 

LIGULE HEIGHT 

medium medium wide 

____________________________________________________ 


medium- sparse to sparse-medium 

dense to medium to medium 

dense 

____________________________________________________ 

AURICLE – PROMINENCE (Second Fully Unfurled Leaf) 


____________________________________________________ 


deltoid transitional deltoid 

____________________________________________________ 


medium very small very small 

to small to small 

____________________________________________________ 


small to n/a very small 

medium 

____________________________________________________ 

FLOWERING 

profuse medium very sparse 

____________________________________________________ 


0.01, Duncan’s Multiple Range Test. 

‘Q185’ 






hybrid. Plant: perennial grass with erect growth habit, many 

tillers per stool. Leaf canopy is medium to heavy. Suckers 

are very few in number. Stem: Culms are short with mean 

length to top visible dewlap (TVD) approximately 2.32m 

(range 1.91 to 2.70m). Alternate internodes of a culm are 

arranged in a medium zigzagged pattern. Length of longest 

internode on bud side is long with mean length 

approximately 18.8cm (range 14.0 to 25.4cm) and side 

opposite bud is long with mean length approximately 

18.6cm (range 13.8 to 25.0cm). Diameter of longest 

internode central and perpendicular to bud is very thin to 

thin with mean approximately 19.1mm (range 15.2 to 


dissecting bud is very thin to thin with mean approximately 

19.6mm (range 15.5 to 29.7mm). Internodes are cylindrical 

shaped and weakly oval in cross-section. Colour of 

dewaxed internode is greyed-brown (RHS 199A) to brown 

(RHS 200C) exposed and greyed-yellow (RHS 160A) 

unexposed. Wax covering of internode is medium to heavy, 

with wax band distinct and narrow to narrow-medium in 

width. Growth cracks are very few-few to few. Cork cracks 

are medium-numerous to numerous. Bud groove is 

inconspicuous and medium to long in length and very 

shallow to shallow in depth. Root band width on bud side is 

narrow (range 6.0 to 8.5mm). Bud is of very weak-weak to 

weak prominence, round in shape and with base medium to 

high above leaf scar and tip slightly below the growth ring. 

Bud width excluding wings is narrow and bud wing is 

narrow to medium in width. Leaf scar is medium to 

prominent and level to weakly oblique descending towards 

bud. Growth ring is swollen. Leaf: lamina of TVD leaf is 

medium in length with mean approximately 1.39m (range 

0.80 to 1.65m), very narrow to narrow with mean width 



Midrib of lamina at longitudinal midpoint is very narrow to 

narrow with mean 2.81mm (range 0.80 to 4.50mm). Lamina 

width to midrib width ratio is medium with mean 

approximately 13.3 (range 8.2 to 36.0). Leaf sheath of TVD 

leaf is very short in length with mean length approximately 

26.0cm (range 21.0 to 30.5cm). Sheath of senescent leaves 


surface (Group 57) are very sparse and very short in length. 

Ligule is deltoid in shape medium width at midrib section. 

Cilia along the free margin of the ligule (Group 61) are 

85


medium density and very short to short in length. Auricles 

are inconspicuous to medium and weakly asymmetrical. 

Inner or underlapping auricle is dentoid in shape and very 

small to small in size. Outer or overlapping auricle is 

transitional in shape. Flowering: flower is an open panicle 

and flowering is discontinuous and sparse. Seed: seed or 

fruit is a caryopsis. Disease resistance: very highly to highly 

resistant to Fiji disease virus, highly resistant to Leaf Scald 


resistant to Pachymetra Root Rot virus. Other 

characteristics: Fibre quantity and quality are acceptable for 





(Gordonvale), QLD, between the female parent ‘75C35’ 

and the male parent ‘66C807’. Seed was collected from the 


in 1989. ‘Q185’ is very highly to highly resistant to Fiji 

disease virus while ‘75C35’ is resistant and ‘66C807’ is 

highly resistant. ‘Q185’ has better resistance to Pachymetra 

root rot compared with ‘75C35’ and ‘66C807’. ‘Q185’ has 

been evaluated and selected by BSES in yield trials on the 

Central Sugar Experiment Station and sites within the 

sugarcane growing area in the central region. Standard 










Choice of Comparators ‘Q124’ and ‘Q136’ were chosen, 


grown in central Queensland. Together, these two varieties 

accounted for over 91% (10.4 million t) of the central 

Queensland crop in 1998. ‘Q124’ is the major variety in 

Queensland, accounting for 42.6% of the total crop in 1998. 

Neither parent was included as a comparator. Both parents 

can distinguishable from the candidate variety on the basis 

of disease resistance as stated above. 

Comparative Trial Comparators: ‘Q124’, and ‘Q136’. 


(21º 9′S, 149º 7′E), Te Kowai, QLD. The trial was planted 

















First sold in Australia in May 1999. 



‘Q185’ *‘Q124’ *‘Q136’ 

____________________________________________________ 

GROWTH HABIT 

erect erect medium 

____________________________________________________ 

TILLERING 

many few medium 

____________________________________________________ 

LEAF CANOPY 

medium light to light to 

to heavy medium medium 

____________________________________________________ 

SUCKERING 

very few very few few to medium 

____________________________________________________ 


mean 2.32a 2.71b 2.40ab 


short medium short to 

to tall medium 

____________________________________________________ 


medium aligned strong 

to weak 

____________________________________________________ 


mean 18.8a 17.3a 18.6a 


long medium long 

to long 

____________________________________________________ 

INTERNODE LENGTH – Side Opposite Bud (cm) LSD (P ≤ 

0.01) = 2.53 

mean 18.6a 17.1a 18.3a 


long medium long 

to long 

____________________________________________________ 


LSD (P ≤ 0.01) = 2.07 

mean 19.1a 24.4b 20.3a 


very thin medium thin 

to thin to thick 

____________________________________________________ 


(P ≤ 0.01) = 2.24 

mean 19.6a 24.1b 20.4a 


very thin medium thin 

to thin to thick 

____________________________________________________ 


cylindrical cylindrical cylindrical 

to weakly to weakly 

obconodial bobbin shaped 

____________________________________________________ 


weakly oval weakly oval round 

____________________________________________________ 

86




greyed-brown greyed-red yellow-green 

(199A) to (182C) (144A) 

brown (200C) 

____________________________________________________ 


greyed- greyed- yellow-green 

yellow yellow (145C to 

(160A) (162A) 150D) 

____________________________________________________ 


medium medium medium to 

to heavy 

medium heavy 

____________________________________________________ 


distinct distinct medium to 

distinct 

____________________________________________________ 


narrow to medium medium 

narrow- 

to wide 

medium 

____________________________________________________ 

GROWTH CRACKS 

very few- absent to absent 

few to few very few 

____________________________________________________ 

CORK CRACKS 

medium- very few very few 

numerous 

to numerous 

____________________________________________________ 


inconspicuous absent to absent 

inconspicuous 

____________________________________________________ 


medium very short n/a 

to long 

____________________________________________________ 


very shallow very shallow n/a 

to shallow 

____________________________________________________ 


narrow medium medium 

to wide 

____________________________________________________ 


very weak- weak medium 

weak to 

weak 

____________________________________________________ 

BUD – SHAPE 

round ovate to round 

rhomboid 

____________________________________________________ 


medium near to medium 

to high medium 

____________________________________________________ 


slightly level slightly 

below 

below 

____________________________________________________ 


narrow narrow to medium 

medium 

____________________________________________________ 


narrow to medium- medium to 

medium wide to wide medium-wide 

____________________________________________________ 


medium to medium to medium 

prominent prominent 

____________________________________________________ 


level to level to weakly 

weakly weakly oblique 

oblique oblique 

____________________________________________________ 


mean 1.39a 1.37a 1.40a 



____________________________________________________ 


(P ≤ 0.01) = 4.3 

mean 33.7a 40.9b 41.7b 


very narrow medium medium 

to narrow 

____________________________________________________ 


(P ≤ 0.01) = 0.5 

mean 2.8a 3.8b 3.1a 


very narrow medium narrow to 

to narrow to wide medium 

____________________________________________________ 


medium low medium to high 

____________________________________________________ 


curve curve near curve 

near tip middle near tip 

____________________________________________________ 


weak medium weak to 

medium 

____________________________________________________ 


mean 26.0a 33.2b 31.9b 


very short long to medium 

very long to long 

____________________________________________________ 


very sparse sparse medium 

____________________________________________________ 


very short short to short 

short-medium 

____________________________________________________ 

LIGULE SHAPE 

deltoid 

cresentiform deltoid to 

to weakly crescentiform 

deltoid 

____________________________________________________ 

87


LIGULE HEIGHT 


to wide 

____________________________________________________ 


medium medium sparse to 

to medium- medium 

dense 

____________________________________________________ 


inconspicuous medium medium 

to medium 

____________________________________________________ 


dentoid lanceolate lanceolate 

____________________________________________________ 


very small small to very small-small 

to small small- to small 

medium 

____________________________________________________ 

FLOWERING 

sparse sparse medium 

____________________________________________________ 


P ≤ 0.01, Duncan’s Multiple Range Test. 

TEA TREE 

Leptospermum hybrid 

‘Rudolph’ 

Application No: 97/345Accepted: 31 Dec 1997. 

Applicant: Peter James Ollerenshaw, Bungendore, 

NSW. 

Characteristics (Table 50, Figure 25) Plant: habit dense 

upright, height medium, Stem: anthocyanin present, 

internodes short. Leaf: long, narrow (average 20.09 x 3.95 

mm), mature leaf colour green (RHS 147A), young leaf 

colour greyed-purple (RHS 187A), shape narrow elliptic 

with acute apex and cuneate base, Flower: late, pedicel very 

short, diameter large, petals long and wide (average 8.39 x 

8.79 mm), colour red-purple (RHS 61B). Gynoecium: 

medium, (average 8.74mm), colour yellow-green (RHS 

146A). Style: yellow-green (RHS 146A), filaments white. 

Calyx: exposed with most points visible between petals, 

colour yellow-green (RHS 146D), Capsule: fertile. (Note: 

all RHS colour chart numbers refer to 1986 edition.) 


Leptospermum spectabile x pollen parent Leptospermum 

morrisonii (purple foliage selection). The seed parent was 

characterised by sparse red-purple flowers. The pollen 

parent was characterised by purple leaves and dense white 

flowers. Hybridisation took place in Bywong, NSW, in Dec 

1991. Selection criteria: from this cross, seedling number 

L27Q (later known as ‘Rudolph’) was chosen in 1995 on 

the basis of flower density and colour. Propagation: a 

number mature stock plants were generated from this 

seedling by stem cuttings were found to be uniform and 

stable. ‘Rudolph’ will be commercially propagated by 

vegetative cuttings from the stock plants. Breeder: Peter 

Ollerenshaw, Bywong, NSW Australia. 

Choice of Comparators The two comparators, 

‘Aphrodite’ A and ‘Rhiannon’ A , were chosen because these 

are similar varieties of common knowledge that have a 

common parent (L. spectabile) and both have red-purple 

flowers. The male parent L. morrisonii was initially 

considered as a comparator but later rejected because it is 

easily differentiated by its white flowers. No other similar 

varieties of common knowledge have been identified. 

Comparative Trial Comparators: ‘Aphrodite’ A and 

‘Rhiannon’ A . Location: Bywong Nursery, Bungendore, 

NSW, autumn 1998 – spring, 1999. Conditions: trial 

conducted in a polyhouse, plants propagated from rooted 

stem cuttings planted into 210mm pots filed with potting 

mix (pine bark base), nutrition maintained with slow release 

fertilisers, pest and disease treatments not required. Trial 

design: ten pots of each variety arranged in a completely 

randomised design. Measurements: from ten plants at 

random. One sample per plant. 


First Australian sale in Oct 1998. No prior sale overseas. 

Description: Robert L. Dunstone, Curtin, ACT. 

Table 50 Leptospermum varieties 

‘Rudolph’ *‘Aphrodite’ A *‘Rhiannon’ A 

____________________________________________________ 

PLANT 

habit upright shrub upright shrub upright shrub 

____________________________________________________ 


mean 20.1 19.2 12.2 



____________________________________________________ 


mean 4.0 4.4 5.0 



____________________________________________________ 

LEAF SHAPE 

blade narrow elliptic elliptic 

elliptic 

apex acute acute acuminate 

base cuneate cuneate cuneate 

____________________________________________________ 

MATURE LEAF COLOUR(RHS, 1986) 

147A 146B 147B 

____________________________________________________ 

NEW LEAF COLOUR(RHS, 1986) 

187A top 146B 146C with 

surface 

red margin 

____________________________________________________ 

GYNOECIUM DIAMETER (mm) 

mean 8.7 7.9 9.6 


LSD/sig 0.7 P≤0.01 P≤0.01 

____________________________________________________ 

PETAL COLOUR (RHS, 1986) 

61B 63A 78A 

____________________________________________________ 

GYNOECIUM COLOUR (RHS, 1986) 

146A 146C 144A 

____________________________________________________ 

STIGMA, STYLE COLOUR (RHS, 1986) 

146A 146C 144A 

____________________________________________________ 

88



FILAMENTS 

white white white 

____________________________________________________ 

CALYX COLOUR (RHS, 1986) 

146D 145D 145C 

____________________________________________________ 

CALYX EXPOSURE 

most points most points points rarely 

visible visible visible 

____________________________________________________ 

FLOWERING TIME 

late mid season mid season 

____________________________________________________ 

WHEAT 


‘Dennis’ 


Applicant: CSIRO Plant Industry, Canberra, ACT and 


ACT. 

Characteristics (Table 51, Figure 58) Plant: semi-erect, 

height moderately short (90cm), medium flowering and 

maturing winter wheat. Stem: little pith present. Leaf: 

sheath slightly glaucous, flag leaf long and weakly 

glaucous, width narrow, Ear: not glaucous, parallel sided, 

colour white, short, moderate density, scurs at tip moderate 

length (19.4mm), lower glume shoulder width narrow and 

sloping, beak medium length, and straight, lower lemma 

beak slightly curved. Grain: white. Disease Resistance: 

resistance to stem rust is provided by the Sr24 and Sr9g 

genes, which distinguishes it from ‘Brennan’ which carries 

the Sr2 gene. Season: winter wheat, responding to 

vernalisation and photoperiod. 


‘Brock’ x pollen parent ‘Hartog’/‘Sunco’ in a planned 

breeding program in Canberra in 1985. The resulting F 1 was 

backcrossed to ‘Brock’ to recover the winter wheat 

characteristics. The female parent is rust susceptible and red 

grained. The pollen parents are spring wheat varieties. 

Selection criteria: ‘Dennis’ is the culmination of a selection 

program for winter habit, rust resistance, early maturity, 

good recovery from grazing and high yield of white grain. 

The variety has been stable during five generations of yield 

trials. Propagation: by seed. Breeder: Dr Jim Davidson, 

CSIRO Plant Industry, Canberra, ACT. 

Choice of Comparators ‘Brennan’ A was selected as a 

comparator because it is a white-grained winter wheat with 

scurs on the tips of the ears. Although the scurs are longer 

in ‘Dennis’ than in ‘Brennan’ A , they are much shorter than 

the awns on other white grained winter wheats except ‘Isis’. 

‘Isis’ was excluded from the comparative trial because it can 

be distinguished from ‘Dennis’ on height, (131 cm in ‘Isis’ 

and 87 cm in ‘Dennis’) flowering time (162 days to flower 

for ‘Isis’ and 158 days for ‘Dennis’ from a 3 June sowing), 

and ‘Isis’ is much more susceptible to rust than is ‘Dennis’. 

Parents were excluded because the female parent is redgrained 

and susceptible to rust, and the male parents are 

spring wheats. 

Comparative Trial Comparator: ‘Brennan’ A . Location: 

CSIRO Ginninderra Research Station, Canberra, ACT. 

Seeds were sown on 10 Mar 1999. Conditions: plants were 

raised in open field plots under dryland condition. Trial 

design: plots (10x2 m 2 ) arranged in a randomised complete 

block with four replicates. Measurements: taken from 10 

random plants from two replicates. 

Prior Applications and Sales nil. 

Description: Dr Ross Downes, Innovative Plant Breeders, Canberra, 

ACT. 

Table 51 Triticum varieties 

‘Dennis’ *‘Brennan’ A 

____________________________________________________ 

TIME OF EAR EMERGENCE (DAYS AFTER SOWING) 

227 223 

____________________________________________________ 

TIME OF ANTHESIS (DAYS AFTER SOWING) 

232 227 

____________________________________________________ 

FLAG LEAF: GLAUCOSITY OF SHEATH 

slight 

moderate 

____________________________________________________ 

EAR: GLAUCOSITY 

minimal 

moderate 

____________________________________________________ 

PLANT LENGTH (cm) 

mean 90.2 103.7 


LSD/sig 4.0 P≤0.01 

____________________________________________________ 

STRAW: PITH IN CROSS SECTION 

thin 

moderate 

____________________________________________________ 

EAR: SPIKELET NUMBER 

mean 19.7 21.9 


LSD/sig 1.1 P≤0.01 

____________________________________________________ 

EAR: LENGTH (mm) 

mean 80.2 90.3 


LSD/sig 6.4 P≤0.01 

____________________________________________________ 

SCUR LENGTH (mm) 

mean 19.4 8.7 


LSD/sig 4.2 P≤0.01 

____________________________________________________ 

APICAL RACHIS SEGMENT: HAIRINESS OF CONVEX 

SURFACE 

strong 

weak 

____________________________________________________ 

LOWER GLUME: SHOULDER WIDTH 

narrow 

broad 

____________________________________________________ 

LOWER GLUME: BEAK SHAPE 

straight 

curved 

____________________________________________________ 

LOWER LEMMA: BEAK SHAPE 

slight curve moderate curve 

____________________________________________________ 

GRAIN: COLOUR 

white 

white 

____________________________________________________ 

SEASONAL TYPE 

winter 

winter 

____________________________________________________ 

89


WHITE CLOVER 

Trifolium repens 

‘Grasslands Bounty’ 


Applicant: New Zealand Pastoral Agriculture Research 

Institute Limited, Hamilton, New Zealand. 

Agent: Mr. Peter Neilson, AgResearch Grasslands, 

Bowna via Albury, NSW. 

Description (Table 52, Figure 60) Plant: intermediate habit, 

medium green herbage plant with mid season maturity. 

Peduncles: short, mean 195mm. Petiole: medium long, 

mean length 87mm, mean thickness 1.41mm Leaf: medium 

length, mean 25.09mm and medium width, mean 20.6mm, 

predominantly elliptical. Leaves ~ 97% crescent marked, ~ 

20% with anthocyanin leaf fleck. Flower: medium size with 

medium to low floret numbers, average ~90 per head. 

Florets: long, mean 11.43mm. Stolons: moderately thin, 

mean 2.43mm with mean internode length 29.23mm. 

Percentage of plants cyanophoric ~94%. 

Origin and Breeding Polycross: originated from hybrids 

between medium to large leafed varieties, ‘Major’, 

‘Grasslands Huia’ and ‘Grasslands Pitau’, re-selection 

plants crossed with small leafed South Island (New 

Zealand) or North Island (New Zealand) hill country 

ecotypes. ‘Major’ is a large leafed variety that was selected 

from ‘Crau’ for the absence of leaf marking. The F 1 lines 

were evaluated in the field and 33 superior genotypes 

selected. These were intercrossed and further screened as F 2 

lines. A final selection of 14 parent genotypes was made 

and the plants polycrossed. The 14 parent lines were 

checked for flowering/seed yield potential. Two inferior 

lines were eliminated and representative plants of the 

remaining 12 parents were isolated to produce seed as 

GC54, which was later known as ‘Grasslands Bounty’. 

Selection criteria: leaf size coupled with autumn growth. 

Propagation: by seed. Breeder: Dr. Keith Widdup, 

AgResearch, Lincoln, New Zealand. 

Choice of Comparators ‘Grasslands Huia’, ‘Grasslands 

Demand’ A , ‘Grasslands Prestige’ A and ‘Grasslands. 

Tahora’ A were chosen as the most similar varieties of 

common knowledge on the basis of leaf size, plant growth 

habit and flowering pattern. Other comparators were 

included because these are also similar varieties of common 

knowledge. ‘Major’ was not included in the trial because of 

the absence of leaf markings. 

Comparative Trial Comparators: ‘Grasslands Huia’, 

‘Grasslands Demand’ A , ‘Grasslands Prestige’ A , 

‘Grasslands Tahora’ A , ‘Grasslands Pitau’, ‘Grasslands 

Sustain’ A , ‘Grasslands Challenge’ A , ‘Lebons’ and 

‘Ladino’. Location: AgResearch Grasslands Research 

Centre, Palmerston North, New Zealand. Mar 1997 – Jan 

1998. Conditions: seeds germinated in petri dishes and 

pricked into potting mix filled seed trays in glasshouse 

17 – 19 Mar 1997. Trays transferred to open air hardening 

off prior to field trial planting on 9 Jun 1997. Trial design: 

block design of 10 randomised replicates of each variety 

represented by 10 spaced plants at 60cm spacing in each 

replicate. Replicates 1.2m apart. Measurements on about 

100 plants of each variety. 


Country Year Status Name Applied 

New Zealand 1997 Granted ‘Grasslands Bounty’ 

UK 1997 Applied ‘Grasslands Bounty’ 


Description: Jeff E. Miller, AgResearch Grasslands Research Centre, 

Palmerston North, New Zealand 

Table 52 Trifolium varieties 

‘Grasslands *‘Grasslands *‘Grasslands *‘Grasslands *‘Grasslands *‘Grasslands *‘Grasslands *‘Grasslands *‘Lebons’ *‘Ladino’ 

Bounty’ Huia’ Demand’ A Prestige’ A Tahora’ A Pitau’ Sustain’ A Challenge’ A 

______________________________________________________________________________________________________________ 

DAYS FROM FIRST ( 13/10/97) TO MEAN FLOWERING 

mean 29.2 29.3 29.3 29.8 31.6 32.6 29.9 29.6 34.6 29.9 

std deviation 10.4 8.6 9.5 9.9 9.7 11.0 10.8 11.2 11.7 10.1 

LSD/sig 3.8 ns ns ns ns ns ns ns P≤0.01 ns 

______________________________________________________________________________________________________________ 

PLANT HEIGHT AT FLOWERING (cm) 

mean 33.1 27.2 26.5 25.9 19.5 38.8 34.6 33.7 28.8 23.2 

std deviation 1.7 3.00 2.6 3.1 3.0 3.0 2.2 2.1 3.1 2.7 

LSD/sig 2.9 P≤0.01 P≤0.01 P≤0.01 P≤0.01 P≤0.01 ns ns P≤0.01 P≤0.01 

______________________________________________________________________________________________________________ 

LEAFLET LENGTH (mm) 

mean 25.09 25.29 24.44 22.78 20.32 30.29 27.83 34.45 32.82 31.37 

std deviation 5.30 4.87 4.26 4.64 4.19 5.21 5.52 6.22 5.75 5.83 

LSD/sig 1.96 ns ns P≤0.01 P≤0.01 P≤0.01 P≤0.01 P≤0.01 P≤0.01 P≤0.01 

______________________________________________________________________________________________________________ 

LEAFLET WIDTH (mm) 

mean 20.59 20.53 20.11 18.47 16.39 23.80 21.92 27.51 24.32 24.71 

std deviation 3.76 3.55 3.59 3.80 3.17 4.07 4.45 5.16 4.84 4.04 

LSD/sig 1.54 ns ns P≤0.01 P≤0.01 P≤0.01 ns P≤0.01 P≤0.01 P≤0.01 

______________________________________________________________________________________________________________ 

PETIOLE LENGTH (mm) 

mean 87.01 84.56 86.84 76.72 67.79 93.80 85.89 117.36 96.86 97.77 

90




__________________________________________________ 

std deviation 26.25 23.56 26.21 21.89 21.47 27.84 29.63 32.51 30.87 29.14 

LSD/sig 12.49 ns ns ns P≤0.01 ns ns P≤0.01 ns ns 

______________________________________________________________________________________________________________ 

PETIOLE THICKNESS (mm) 

mean 1.41 1.44 1.42 1.31 1.19 1.75 1.56 2.05 1.87 1.81 

std deviation 0.28 0.21 0.25 0.24 0.22 0.41 0.26 0.37 0.37 0.27 

LSD/sig 0.11 ns ns ns P≤0.01 P≤0.01 P≤0.01 P≤0.01 P≤0.01 P≤0.01 

______________________________________________________________________________________________________________ 

STOLON THICKNESS (mm) 

mean 2.42 2.50 2.49 2.21 2.13 2.96 2.78 3.23 3.24 3.52 

std deviation 0.35 0.31 0.33 0.34 0.28 0.37 0.37 0.50 0.52 0.59 

LSD/sig 0.15 ns ns P≤0.01 P≤0.01 P≤0.01 P≤0.01 P≤0.01 P≤0.01 P≤0.01 

______________________________________________________________________________________________________________ 

INTERNODE LENGTH (mm) 

mean 29.23 31.94 30.18 28.59 28.30 32.82 32.24 32.51 33.54 28.43 

std deviation 9.83 8.68 7.75 8.96 8.24 9.91 8.00 9.54 7.94 9.05 

LSD/sig 3.06 ns ns ns ns P≤0.01 ns P≤0.01 P≤0.01 ns 

______________________________________________________________________________________________________________ 


mean 195.0 199.6 217.1 185.5 183.1 218.0 211.6 228.0 236.4 206.6 

std deviation 43.95 36.91 44.79 41.32 40.31 43.76 46.38 49.74 36.07 46.36 

LSD/sig 20.37 ns P≤0.01 ns ns P≤0.01 ns P≤0.01 P≤0.01 ns 

______________________________________________________________________________________________________________ 

PEDUNCLE THICKNESS (mm) 

mean 2.01 1.66 2.12 1.60 1.82 2.33 1.92 2.33 2.65 2.03 

std deviation 0.25 0.26 0.26 0.23 0.23 0.30 0.28 0.34 0.33 0.32 

LSD/sig 0.15 P≤0.01 ns P≤0.01 P≤0.01 P≤0.01 ns P≤0.01 P≤0.01 ns 

______________________________________________________________________________________________________________ 

FLORET LENGTH (mm) 

mean 11.43 10.63 10.76 10.24 10.63 11.24 11.16 11.54 12.40 10.83 

std deviation 0.79 0.60 0.75 0.61 0.66 0.75 0.73 0.64 0.84 0.75 

LSD/sig 0.34 P≤0.01 P≤0.01 P≤0.01 P≤0.01 ns ns ns P≤0.01 P≤0.01 

______________________________________________________________________________________________________________ 

PERCENTAGE OF PLANTS WITH LEAF MARKS 

91 93 94 92 92 91 98 99 79 87 

______________________________________________________________________________________________________________ 

PERCENTAGE OF CYANOGENIC PLANTS 

94 54 86 62 74 94 44 88 88 0 

______________________________________________________________________________________________________________ 

ZONAL GERANIUM 

Pelargonium xhortorum 

‘BFP-721 Bright Lilac’ syn Designer Bright 

Lilac 

Application No: 98 / 013 Accepted: 31 Mar 1998. 

Applicant: Ball FloraPlant – Division of Ball 

Horticultural Company, Illinois, USA. 


Characteristics (Table 53, Figure 12) Plant: height of 

foliage tall (181mm), width broad (327mm), number of 

inflorescences medium to many (4.7), colour of stem green. 

Leaf: length long (67mm), width broad (115mm), shape 

type 3, degree of lobing weak to medium, base open, upper 

colour medium, variegation absent, zone on upper side 

absent, margin incisions crenate, depth of incisions weak, 

margin undulation weak to medium. Inflorescence: 

peduncle length medium to long (203mm), diameter small 

(91mm), longest pedicel length short (3.2mm). Pedicel: 

colour of mid third green and light red, swelling absent. 

Flower: bud shape elliptic, type double, number of petals 

few (7.7) Petal: margin entire. Upper petal: width medium 

to broad (23mm), upperside margin colour RHS 67B, 

upperside middle colour RHS 67B, lowerside colour ca 

RHS 68B, markings present, marking type stripe, marking 

conspicuousness medium. Lower petal: upperside margin 

colour RHS 67B, upperside middle colour RHS 67B, 

lowerside colour RHS 68B, markings present, marking 

conspicuousness weak. Inner Petal: upperside colour RHS 

67B, markings present. Time of beginning of flowering 

medium to late. (Note: all RHS colour chart numbers refer 


Origin and Breeding Controlled pollination: Seed parent 

‘Laura’ x pollen parent ‘Fox’. The seed parent is 

characterised by semi double lavender coloured flowers and 

medium green foliage. The pollen parent is characterised by 

semi double purple flowers. Hybridisation took place at 

Arroyo Grande, California, USA. From this cross, a 

seedling designated ‘BFP-721 Bright Lilac’ was chosen on 

the basis of plant habit and foliage characters. Selection 

criteria: medium green foliage, medium growth habit, selfbranching. 

Propagation: vegetatively propagated by cutting 

over more than eight generations and is uniform and stable. 

Breeder: Dr. S. Trees, Arroyo Grande, USA. 

Choice of Comparators ‘Sassa’ A and ‘Lilac’ were initially 

considered for the comparative trial, as these are similar 

varieties of common knowledge. ‘Sassa’ A was excluded 

from the trial on the basis of leaf type, presence of zonation 

91


on leaves and type of margin incisions. ‘Lilac’ was used as 

a comparator because of similar leaf and flower characters. 

The seed parent ‘Laura’ was not used in the trial because of 

flower type and smaller inflorescences with fewer flowers 

than ‘BFP-721 Bright Lilac’. The pollen parent ‘Fox’ was 

excluded from the trial on the basis of flower type and 

flower colour. 

Comparative Trial Comparator: ‘Lilac’. Location: 

A.J.Newport and son Pty Ltd, Winmalee, Jul – Nov 1999. 

Conditions: trials conducted in a polyhouse, plants 

propagated from cutting, rooted cuttings planted in 150mm 

pots containing commercial media, dripper irrigated, 

spacing at 40cm, nutrition, pest and disease treatment as 

required. Trial design: twenty plants of each variety 


Measurements: taken from all trial plants, one sample per 

plant. 



USA 1994 Granted ‘BFP-721 

(PP 9217) Bright Lilac’ 

The Netherlands 1994 Refused ‘Designer 

Bright Lilac’ 

First sold in USA in 1994. First Australian sale in 1997. 


NSW. 

Table 53 Pelargonium varieties 

‘BFP-721 *‘Lilac’ 

Bright Lilac’ 

____________________________________________________ 

PLANT: HEIGHT OF FOLIAGE (mm) 

mean 181 141 


LSD/sig 20 P≤0.01 

____________________________________________________ 

PLANT: WIDTH (EXCLUDING INFLORESCENCES) (mm) 

mean 327 270 


LSD/sig 34 P≤0.01 

____________________________________________________ 

LEAF: LENGTH (mm) 

mean 67 59 



____________________________________________________ 

LEAF: WIDTH (mm) 

mean 115 104 



____________________________________________________ 

LEAF: 

shape type 3 type 3 

degree of lobing weak to medium weak to medium 

base open open to closed 

upper colour medium medium 

variegation absent absent 

zone on upper side absent absent 

type of incisions of margin 

crenate 

crenate 

depth of incisions weak weak 

margin undulation weak to medium weak to medium 

____________________________________________________ 

INFLORESECENCE: LENGTH OF PEDUNCLE (mm) 

mean 203 175 


LSD/sig 18 P≤0.01 

____________________________________________________ 

INFLORESECENCE: DIAMETER (mm) 

mean 91 108 


LSD/sig 10 P≤0.01 

____________________________________________________ 

INFLORESECENCE: LENGTH OF LONGEST 

PEDICEL (mm) 

mean 3.2 3.9 


LSD/sig 0.4 P≤0.01 

____________________________________________________ 

FLOWER: NUMBER OF PETALS 

mean 7.7 9.1 


LSD/sig 1.1 P≤0.01 

____________________________________________________ 

UPPER PETAL: COLOUR (RHS, 1986) 

upper side margin 67B 67B 

upper side middle 67B 67B 

lower side 68B 68A 

____________________________________________________ 

LOWER PETAL: COLOUR (RHS, 1986) 

upper side margin 67B 67B 

upper side middle 67B 67B 

lower side 68B 68A 

____________________________________________________ 


medium to late late 

____________________________________________________ 

‘BFP-788 Bright Scarlet’ syn Designer Bright 

Scarlet 

Application No: 98/012 Accepted: 31 Mar 1998. 




Characteristics (Table 54, Figure 13) Plant: height of 


inflorescence many (5.8), colour of stem green. Leaf: length 

medium to long (65mm), width medium (107mm), shape 

type 3, degree of lobing weak to medium, base open to 

closed, upper colour medium, variegation absent, zone on 

upper side absent or present, zone conspicuousness absent 

or very weak, margin incisions crenate, depth of incisions 

weak, margin undulation medium to strong. Inflorescence: 

peduncle length long to very long (218mm), diameter large 

(121mm), longest pedicel length medium (3.9mm). Pedicel: 

colour of mid third green, swelling absent. Flower: bud 

shape elliptic, type double, number of petals medium (9.1). 

Petal: margin entire. Upper petal: width very broad 

(24.7mm), upperside margin colour RHS ca 44A, upperside 

middle colour RHS ca 44A, lowerside colour RHS ca 33A, 

markings absent. Lower petal: upperside margin colour 

RHS ca 44A, upperside middle colour RHS ca 44A, 

lowerside colour RHS ca 33A, markings absent. Inner petal: 

upperside colour RHS ca 44A, markings absent, Time of 

beginning of flowering medium to late. (Note: all RHS 

colour chart numbers refer to 1986 edition.) 


1908-47 x pollen parent PAS 231-1-2. The seed parent was 

92



characterised by single scarlet flowers and dark green 

foliage. The pollen parent was characterised by semi-double 

dark red flowers and medium green foliage. Hybridisation 

took place at Arroyo Grande, California, USA. From this 

cross, a seedling designated ‘BFP-788 Bright Scarlet’ was 

chosen on the basis of plant habit and foliage characters. 

Selection criteria: medium green foliage, medium growth 

habit, self-branching. Propagation: vegetatively propagated 

by cutting over more than eight generations and is uniform 

and stable. Breeder: Dr. S. Trees, Arroyo Grande, USA. 

Choice of Comparators ‘Alex’, ‘Pendaco’ A , ‘Dark Red 

Irene’, ‘Starburst Red’ and ‘Scarlet’ were initially 

considered for the comparative trial, as these are similar 

varieties of common knowledge. ‘Alex’ and ‘Dark Red 

Irene’ were excluded from the trial because they have leaf 

shape type 1. ‘Pendaco’ A was excluded from the trial 

because it has medium to strong zone conspicuousness and 

dark red pedicel colour (mid third). ‘Scarlet’ was chosen 

because plant habit and flower colour characters were 

similar to ‘BFP-788 Bright Scarlet’ and ‘Starburst Red’ was 

chosen because the primary petal colour is similar to that of 

‘BFP-788 Bright Scarlet’. The seed parent 1908-47 was 


foliage colour. The pollen parent PAS 231-1-2 was excluded 

from the trial on the basis of flower colour. 

Comparative Trial Comparator: ‘Starburst Red’ and 

‘Scarlet’. Location: A.J.Newport and Son Pty Ltd, 

Winmalee, Jul – Nov 1999. Conditions: trials conducted in 

a polyhouse, plants propagated from cutting, rooted cuttings 

planted in 150mm pots containing commercial media, 

dripper irrigated, spacing at 40cm, nutrition, pest and 

disease treatment as required. Trial design: twenty plants of 

each variety arranged in a completely randomised design. 


plant. 



USA 1995 Granted (PP 9551)‘BFP-788 Bright 

Scarlet’ 

Europe 1995 Granted ‘Designer Bright 

Scarlet’ 



NSW. 


‘BFP-788 ‘Starburst *‘Scarlet’ 

Bright Red’ 

Scarlet’ 

____________________________________________________ 


LSD (P≤0.01)=34 

mean 305de 339ef 348f 

std deviation 28 41 52 

____________________________________________________ 

PLANT: NUMBER OF INFLORESCENCES LSD (P≤0.01)=1.2 

mean 5.8e 3.5bc 5.8e 


____________________________________________________ 

LEAF: LENGTH (mm) LSD (P≤0.01)=4 

mean 65efg 74h 62def 


____________________________________________________ 

LEAF: WIDTH (mm) LSD (P≤0.01)=7 

mean 107cd 127f 107cd 

std deviation 5 12 9 

____________________________________________________ 

LEAF: 

shape type 3 type 3 type 3 

degree of lobing weak to weak weak to 

medium 

medium 

base open to open open to 

closed 

closed 

upper colour medium medium medium 

variegation absent absent absent 

zone on upper side 

absent to present present 

present 

zone conspicuousness 

absent to medium medium to 

very weak 

strong 


crenate crenate bicrenate 

depth of incisions 

weak weak weak 

margin undulation 


to strong medium 

____________________________________________________ 

INFLORESECENCE: LENGTH OF PEDUNCLE (mm) LSD 

(P≤0.01)=18 

mean 218def 238g 236fg 


____________________________________________________ 

INFLORESECENCE: DIAMETER (mm) LSD (P≤0.01)=10 

mean 121e 116de 109cd 

std deviation 11 13 12 

____________________________________________________ 

PEDICEL 

colour of mid third 

green dark red green 

____________________________________________________ 

FLOWER 

bud shape elliptic narrow elliptic 

elliptic to elliptic 

type double single double 

overlapping of 

petal n/a present n/a 

____________________________________________________ 

FLOWER: NUMBER OF PETALS LSD (P≤0.01)=1.1 

mean 9.1bc n/a 7.7a 

std deviation 2 n/a 1 

____________________________________________________ 

UPPER PETAL: WIDTH (mm) LSD (P≤0.01)=1.7 

mean 24.7f 19.5a 23.2ef 


____________________________________________________ 


upper side margin 

ca 44A 46C and ca 44A 

65A and 

52D and 62D 

upper side middle 

ca 44A 

46C and 65A ca 44B 

and 52D 

and 62D 

93


lower side ca 33A 43C and 65D 33A 

and 54D 

____________________________________________________ 


upper side margin 

ca 44A 

upper side middle 

ca 44A 

46C and 65A ca 44A 

and 52D 

and 62D 

46C and 65A ca 44B 

and 52D 

and 62D 

lower side ca 33A 43C and 65D 33A 

and 54D 

____________________________________________________ 

INNER PETAL: COLOUR (RHS, 1986) 

upper side colour 

ca 44A n/a ca 44A 

markings absent n/a absent 

____________________________________________________ 


medium late early 

to late 

____________________________________________________ 

Note: mean values followed by the same letter are not significantly 

different at P≤0.01 according to Duncan’s Multiple Range Test. 

‘BFP-838 Dark Red’ syn Designer Dark Red 






foliage medium (157mm), width broad (326mm), number 

of inflorescences medium to many (5.4), colour of stem 

green. Leaf: length medium (66mm), width medium to 

broad (114mm), shape type 3, degree of lobing medium, 

base closed to overlapping, upper colour medium, 

variegation absent, zone on upper side present, zone 

conspicuousness weak to medium, margin incisions 

crenate, depth of incisions weak, margin undulation weak to 

medium. Inflorescence: peduncle length medium to long 

(208mm), diameter medium (105mm), longest pedicel 

length short to medium (3.5mm). Pedicel: colour of mid 

third light red, swelling absent. Flower: bud shape elliptic, 

type double. Number of petals many (13.0). Petal: margin 

entire. Upper petal: width narrow to medium (21.4mm), 

upperside margin colour RHS 45A-B, upperside middle 

colour ca RHS 45B, lowerside colour ca RHS 45B, 

markings absent. Lower petal: upperside margin colour 

RHS 57A, upperside middle colour RHS 57A, lowerside 

colour RHS 45B, markings absent. Inner Petal: upperside 

colour RHS 45A, markings absent. Time of beginning of 

flowering early to medium. (Note: all RHS colour chart 

numbers refer to 1986 edition.) 


G4111-4 x pollen parent ‘Fox’. The seed and pollen parents 

were characterised by compact plant habit, medium foliage 

colour and semi double flowers. Hybridisation took place at 

Arroyo Grande, California, USA. From this cross, a 

seedling designated ‘BFP-838 Dark Red’ was chosen on the 

basis of plant habit and foliage characters. Selection 

criteria: medium green foliage, medium growth habit, selfbranching. 




Choice of Comparators ‘Alex’, ‘Pendaco’ A , ‘Dark Red 

Irene’ and ‘Sassy Dark Red’ A were initially considered for 

the comparative trial as these are similar varieties of 

common knowledge. ‘Alex’ and ‘Dark Red Irene’ were 

excluded from the trial on the basis of leaf shape type and 

type of incisions on leaf margins. ‘Pendaco’ A was excluded 

from the trial on the basis of the type of incisions on leaf 

margins and upperside petal colours. ‘Sassy Dark Red’ A 

was chosen for similar flower colour and plant habit 

characters. ‘BFP-838 Dark Red’ is clearly distinguishable 

from its seed parent G4111-4 and pollen parent ‘Fox’ on the 

basis of flower type and petal colours. 

Comparative Trial Comparator: ‘Sassy Dark Red’ A . 

Location: A.J.Newport and Son Pty Ltd, Winmalee, Jul – 

Nov 1999. Conditions: trials conducted in a polyhouse, 

plants propagated from cutting, rooted cuttings planted in 

150mm pots containing commercial media, dripper 

irrigated, spacing at 40cm, nutrition, pest and disease 

treatment as required. Trial design: twenty plants of each 

variety arranged in a completely randomised design. 

Measurements taken from all trial plants, one sample per 

plant. 


Country Year Current Status Varietal Name 

USA 1995 Granted (PP 9554)‘BFP-838 Dark 

Red’ 

Germany 1995 Granted ‘Designer Dark 

Red’ 



NSW. 


‘BFP-838 *‘Sassy 

Dark Red’ Dark Red’ A 

____________________________________________________ 

PLANT: NUMBER OF INFLORESCENCES 

mean 5.4 3.8 


LSD/sig 1.2 P≤0.01 

____________________________________________________ 


mean 66 61 



____________________________________________________ 


mean 114 106 



____________________________________________________ 

LEAF: 

shape type 3 type3 

degree of lobing medium weak to medium 

base closed to closed to partly 

overlapping overlapping 

upper colour medium dark 


zone on upper side present present 

94



zone conspicuousness weak to medium medium to strong 


crenate 

crenate 


margin undulation weak to medium medium 

____________________________________________________ 

INFLORESECENCE: LENGTH OF LONGEST PEDICEL (mm) 

mean 3.5 3.2 


LSD/sig 18 ns 

____________________________________________________ 


mean 13.0 9.8 


LSD/sig 1.1 P≤0.01 

____________________________________________________ 

UPPER PETAL: WIDTH (mm) 

mean 21.4 23.8 


LSD/sig 1.7 P≤0.01 

____________________________________________________ 


upper side margin 45A-B 45B 

upper side middle ca 45B ca 45B 

lower side ca 45B 46C 

____________________________________________________ 


upper side margin darker than 57A 45B 

upper side middle darker than 57A 57A 

lower side 45B 46C 

____________________________________________________ 

INNER PETAL: COLOUR (RHS, 1986) 

upper side colour 45A ca 45B-46B 

markings absent absent 

____________________________________________________ 


early to medium early to medium 

____________________________________________________ 

‘Pink Heart’ syn Showcase Pink Heart 






foliage short (123mm), width very narrow (205mm), 

number of inflorescences medium (4.1), colour of stem 

green. Leaf: length short (46mm), width very narrow 

(76mm), shape type 2, degree of lobing weak to medium, 

base open, upper colour dark, variegation absent, zone on 

upper side absent, margin incisions biserrate, depth of 

incisions weak to medium, margin undulation medium to 

strong. Inflorescence: peduncle length very short (146mm), 

diameter large (116mm), longest pedicel length medium 

(4.4mm). Pedicel: colour of mid third dark red, swelling 

present. Flower: bud shape elliptic, type single, overlapping 

of petals present. Petal: margin entire. Upper petal: width 

narrow (19.9mm), upperside margin colour RHS 74D, 

upperside middle colour RHS ca 57A, lowerside colour 

RHS 65A, markings present, marking type macule and 

stripe, marking conspicuousness strong. Lower petal: 

upperside margin colour RHS 74D, upperside middle 

colour RHS ca 57A, lowerside colour RHS 65A, markings 

present, marking conspicuousness strong. Time of 

beginning of flowering very early. (Note: all RHS colour 

chart numbers refer to 1986 edition.) 


9380E x pollen parent ‘Rio’. The seed parent was 

characterised by compact habit, medium foliage colour and 

single pink flowers. The pollen parent was characterised by 

dark foliage and single pink flowers. Hybridisation took 

place at Arroyo Grande, California, USA. From this cross, 

a seedling designated ‘Pink Heart’ was chosen on the basis 

of plant habit and foliage characters. Selection criteria: 

medium green foliage, medium growth habit, selfbranching. 




Choice of Comparators ‘Rio’, ‘Jana’ A , ‘Pensid’ A and 

‘Rosen Perle’ were initially considered for the comparative 

trial, as these are similar varieties of common knowledge. 

‘Pensid’ A and ‘Jana’ were excluded from the trial because 

they both have semi double flowers. ‘Rosen Perle’ was 

excluded on the basis of leaf colour and leaf shape type. 

Pollen parent ‘Rio’ was used as a comparator because it has 

similar foliage and flower characters. Seed parent 9380E 

was excluded from the trial on the basis of light to medium 

foliage colour. 

Comparative Trial Comparator: ‘Rio’. Location: 

A.J.Newport and Son Pty Ltd, Winmalee, Jul – Nov 1999. 








plant. 


Country Year Current Status Varietal Name 

USA 1994 Granted ‘Pink Heart’ 

(PP9218) 

The Netherlands 1994 Surrendered ‘Showcase Pink 

Heart’ 



NSW. 


‘Pink Heart’ *‘Rio’ 

____________________________________________________ 

PLANT: HEIGHT OF FOLIAGE (mm) 

mean 123 160 


LSD/sig 20 P≤0.01 

____________________________________________________ 


mean 205 243 


LSD/sig 34 P≤0.01 

____________________________________________________ 


mean 4.1 1.9 


LSD/sig 1.2 P≤0.01 

____________________________________________________ 

95



mean 46 55 



____________________________________________________ 


mean 76 92 



____________________________________________________ 

LEAF 


degree of lobing weak to medium medium 

base open open 

upper colour dark dark 


zone on upper side absent absent 


biserrate 

biserrate 

depth of incisions weak to medium medium 

margin undulation medium to strong medium 

____________________________________________________ 


mean 4.4 4.9 


LSD/sig 0.4 P≤0.01 

____________________________________________________ 


upper side margin 74D 73B 

upper side middle ca 57A ca 57A 

lower side 65A 65A 

____________________________________________________ 


upper side margin 74D 73B 

upper side middle ca 57A ca 57A 

lower side 65A 65A 

____________________________________________________ 


very early late 

____________________________________________________ 

‘Showcase Salmon’ 






foliage medium (150mm), width narrow (258mm), number 

of inflorescences medium (3.3), colour of stem green. Leaf: 

length short (51mm), width narrow (87mm), shape type 1, 

degree of lobing weak to medium, base open to closed, 

upper colour dark, variegation absent, zone on upper side 

present, zone conspicuousness weak, margin incisions 

biserrate, depth of incisions weak, margin undulation 

medium. Inflorescence: peduncle length short (175mm), 

diameter medium to large (112mm), longest pedicel length 

medium (3.8mm). Pedicel: colour of mid third light red, 

swelling absent. Flower: bud shape elliptic, type double, 

number of petals medium (9.7). Petal: margin entire. Upper 

petal: width narrow to medium (20.6mm), upperside margin 

colour RHS 62B, upperside middle colour RHS 43C, 

lowerside colour RHS 54C, markings absent. Lower petal: 

upperside margin colour RHS 62B, upperside middle 

colour RHS 43C, lowerside colour RHS 54D, markings 

absent. Inner petal: upperside colour RHS 43C, markings 

absent. Time of beginning of flowering medium. (Note: all 

RHS colour chart numbers refer to 1986 edition.) 


‘BSR-100B Dark Salmon’ x pollen parent 907-4. The seed 

parent was characterised by dark salmon flower colour. The 

pollen parent was characterised by semi double flowers and 

a compact plant habit. Hybridisation took place at Arroyo 

Grande, California, USA. From this cross, a seedling 

designated ‘BFP-445 Salmon’ was chosen on the basis of 

plant habit and foliage characters. Selection criteria: 

medium green foliage, medium growth habit, selfbranching. 




Choice of Comparators ‘Dagmar Murray’, ‘Berg 

Palais’ A , ‘Eric Hoskins’, ‘Salmon Irene’ and ‘Salmon’ were 

initially considered for the comparative trial, as these are 

similar varieties of common knowledge. ‘Dagmar Murray’ 

and ‘Berg Palais’ A have type 3 leaf shapes and were 

excluded from the trial on this basis. ‘Eric Hoskins’ has 

strong zonal conspicuousness and upper petal upperside 

colour of RHS 43D and was excluded from the trial on this 

basis. ‘Salmon Irene’ has medium green leaves and petal 

upperside colour of RHS 52B and was excluded from the 

trial on this basis. ‘Salmon’ was chosen for flower colour 

and plant habit characters. ‘BFP-445 Salmon’ is clearly 

distinguishable from its seed parent ‘BSR-100B Dark 

Salmon’ and pollen parent 907-4 on the basis of petal colour 

and they are excluded from the trial for this reason. 

Comparative Trial Comparator: ‘Salmon’. Location: 

A.J.Newport and Son Pty Ltd, Winmalee, Jul – Nov 1999. 








plant. 



Germany 1993 Granted ‘Showcase 

Salmon’ 

The Netherlands 1994 Granted ‘Showcase 

Salmon’ 

USA 1994 Granted ‘BFP-445 

(PP9228) Salmon’ 



NSW. 

96




‘Showcase *‘Salmon’ 

Salmon’ 

____________________________________________________ 


mean 3.3 5.2 


LSD/sig 1.2 P≤0.01 

____________________________________________________ 


mean 87 92 



____________________________________________________ 

LEAF 


degree of lobing weak to medium weak to medium 

base open to closed open to wide open 

upper colour dark medium 


zone on upper side present present 

zone conspicuousness weak medium to strong 


biserrate 

bicrenate 


margin undulation medium medium to strong 

____________________________________________________ 

INFLORESECENCE: LENGTH OF PEDUNCLE (mm) 

mean 175 224 


LSD/sig 18 P≤0.01 

____________________________________________________ 

INFLORESECENCE: DIAMETER (mm) LSD (P≤0.01)=10 

mean 112 98 


LSD/sig 10 P≤0.01 

____________________________________________________ 


mean 3.8 3.3 


LSD/sig 0.4 P≤0.01 

____________________________________________________ 


mean 9.7 8.0 


LSD/sig 1.1 P≤0.01 

____________________________________________________ 

UPPER PETAL: WIDTH (mm) 

mean 20.6 22.5 


LSD/sig 1.7 P≤0.01 

____________________________________________________ 


upper side margin 62B 55C 

upper side middle 43C 43C 

lower side 54C 52C 

____________________________________________________ 


upper side margin 62B 55C 

upper side middle 43C 43C 

lower side 54D 52C 

____________________________________________________ 


medium 

early 

____________________________________________________ 

‘Starburst Red’ 

Application No: 98 / 009 Accepted: 31 Mar 1998. 






inflorescence medium (3.5), colour of stem green. Leaf: 

length long (74mm), width broad (127mm), shape type 3, 

degree of lobing weak, base open, upper colour medium, 

variegation absent, zone on upper side present, zone 

conspicuousness medium, margin incisions crenate, depth 

of incisions weak, margin undulation weak to medium. 

Inflorescence: peduncle length very long (238mm), 

diameter medium (116mm), longest pedicel length medium 

(3.9mm). Pedicel: colour of mid third dark red, swelling 

absent. Flower: bud shape narrow elliptic to elliptic, type 

single, overlapping of petals present. Petal: margin entire. 

Upper petal: width narrow (19.5mm), colours in alternate 

stripes, primary upperside margin colours RHS 46C and 

65A, secondary colours RHS 52D and 62D, primary 

upperside middle colours RHS 46C and 65A, secondary 

colours RHS 52D and 62D, primary lower side colours 

RHS 43C and 65D, secondary colour RHS 54D, markings 

absent. Lower petal: colours in alternate stripes, primary 

upperside margin colours RHS 46C and 65A, secondary 

colours RHS 52D and 62D, primary upperside middle 

colours RHS 46C and 65A, secondary colours RHS 52D 

and 62D, primary lower side colours RHS 43C and 65D, 

secondary colour RHS 54D, markings absent. Time of 

beginning of flowering late. (Note: all RHS colour chart 

numbers refer to 1986 edition.) 


4077-1 x pollen parent ‘BSR-177 White’. The seed parent 

was characterised by single purple and white striped 

flowers. The pollen parent was characterised by semidouble 

white flowers. Hybridisation took place at Arroyo 

Grande, California, USA. From this cross, a seedling 

designated ‘Starburst Red’ was chosen on the basis of plant 

habit and foliage characters. Selection Criteria: medium 

green foliage, medium growth habit, self-branching. 

Propagation: vegetatively propagated by cutting over more 

than eight generations and is uniform and stable. Breeder: 

Dr. S. Trees, Arroyo Grande, USA. 

Choice of Comparators ‘Scarlet’ and ‘BFP-788 Bright 

Scarlet’ were considered for the comparative trial as these 

are similar varieties of common knowledge. ‘Scarlet’ and 

‘BFP-788 Bright Scarlet’ were chosen because the primary 

petal colour is similar to that of ‘Starburst Red’. The seed 

parent 4077-1 was excluded from the trial on the basis of 

flower colour. The pollen parent ‘BSR-177 White’ was 


colour. 

Comparative Trial Comparators: ‘BFP-788 Bright Scarlet’ 

and ‘Scarlet’. Location: A.J.Newport and Son Pty Ltd, 

Winmalee, Jul – Nov 1999. Conditions: trials conducted in 

a polyhouse, plants propagated from cutting, rooted cuttings 

planted in 150mm pots containing commercial media, 

dripper irrigated, spacing at 40cm, nutrition, pest and 

97


disease treatment as required. Trial design: twenty plants of 

each variety arranged in a completely randomised design. 


plant. 



USA 1994 Granted (PP 9229)‘Starburst Red’ 



NSW. 

GRANTS 

AGAPANTHUS 

Agapanthus orientalis 

‘Black Pantha’ A 

Application No: 98/127 Grantee: Agapan Growers Pty 

Ltd, Belgrave, VIC. 

Certificate No: 1363 Expiry Date: 20 December, 2019. 

ALSTROEMERIA 


‘Ballet’ A 

Application No: 96/149 Grantee: PhytoNova Holding bv. 


Agent: F & I Baguley Flower & Plant Growers, Clayton 

South, VIC. 

‘Little Moon’ A 

Application No: 97/178 Grantee: Koninklijke Van Zanten 

BV. 



South, VIC. 

‘Stabelin’ A syn Belinda A 

Application No: 97/243 Grantee: Van Staaveren BV. 



South, VIC. 

‘Staprimil’ A syn Emily A 




South, VIC. 

‘Staprimon’ A syn Monica A 




South, VIC. 

‘Staprinag’ A syn Ragna A 




South, VIC. 

‘Staprisis’ A syn Sissi A 




South, VIC. 

‘Staprizsa’ A syn Zsa Zsa A 


98

GRANTS 



Agent: F & I Baguley Flower & Plant Growers, 


‘Virginia’ A 

Application No: 96/148 Grantee: Koninklijke Van Zanten 

BV. 



South, VIC. 

APPLE 

Malus domestica 

‘Charlotte’ A 

Application No: 98/123 Grantee: Horticulture Research 

International. 



Monbulk, VIC. 

‘Obelisk’ A syn Flamenco A 

Application No: 98/122 Grantee: Horticulture Research 

International. 



Monbulk, VIC. 

BARLEY 

Hordeum vulgare 

FIG, WEEPING 

Ficus benjamina 

‘Marole’ A syn Bushy King A 

Application No: 97/267 Grantee: Gebr vd Knaap W. 


Agent: Futura Promotions Pty Ltd, Crestmead, QLD. 

‘Mikkie’ A syn Bushy Prince A 

Application No: 97/266 Grantee: Gebr vd Knaap W. 


Agent: Futura Promotions Pty Ltd, Crestmead, QLD. 

HOPS 

Humulus lupulus 

‘Furano No. 18’ A 

Application No: 94/095 Grantee: Sapporo Breweries Ltd. 

Certificate No: 1375 Expiry Date: 26 April, 2014. 

Agent: Phillips Ormonde & Fitzpatrick, Melbourne, VIC. 

LILY 

Lilium hybrid 

‘Siberia’ A 

Application No: 94/230 Grantee: Siberia Oriental BV. 


Agent: Kenny Lane Nurseries Pty Ltd, Monbulk, VIC. 

‘Doolup’ A 

Application No: 98/141 Grantee: Chief Executive Officer, 

Agriculture Western Australia, South Perth, WA 


Barton, ACT. 


‘Wyalong’ A 

Application No: 98/137 Grantee: Department of 

Agriculture for and on behalf of the State of New South 

Wales, Orange, NSW and Grains Research and 



FIELD PEA 

Pisum sativum 

‘Excell’ A 

Application No: 98/180 Grantee: Agriculture Victoria 

Services Pty Ltd, Attwood, VIC and Grains Research and 



‘Paravic’ A 


Services Pty Ltd, Attwood, VIC and Grains Research and 



LUCERNE 

Medicago sativa 

‘Grasslands Kaituna’ A 

Application No: 96/037 Grantee: New Zealand Pastoral 

Agriculture Research Institute Limited and W-L 

Research Inc. 


Agent: AgResearch Grasslands, Bowna Via Albury, NSW. 

LUPIN, NARROW LEAFED 

Lupinus angustifolius 

‘Moonah’ A 


Services Pty Ltd, Attwood, VIC, Chief Executive Officer, 



Barton, ACT. 


‘Tanjil’ A 




Barton, ACT. 


99


LUPIN, WHITE 

Lupinus albus 

‘Ludet’ A 

Application No: 97/143 Grantee: Agri Obtentions SA. 


Agent: WestVic AgServices, Horsham, VIC. 

‘Magna’ A 

Application No: 98/205 Grantee: CSIRO Plant Industry, 

Canberra, ACT. 


‘Minibean’ A 


Canberra, ACT. 


MANGO 

Mangifera indica 

‘Honey Gold’ A 

Application No: 96/043 Grantee: Burnett Asphalts Pty 

Ltd, Rockhampton, QLD. 


MOCK ORANGE 

Murraya paniculata var ovatifoliata 

‘Min-A-Min’ A 

Application No: 98/109 Grantee: Trevor John Garrad 

trading as Trevs Terrific Trees, Woombye, QLD. 


NEW SOUTH WALES CHRISTMAS BUSH 

Ceratopetalum gummiferum 

‘Vic 90-1’ A 

Application No: 95/290 Grantee: Vic John Ciccolella, 

Oakville, NSW. 


OATS 

Avena sativa 

‘Bass’ A 

Application No: 98/041 Grantee: University of Tasmania 

and The Crown in Right of the State of Tasmania 

through the Department of Primary Industries, Water 

and Environment, Kings Meadows, TAS. 


‘Heritage Lordship’ A 

Application No: 98/049 Grantee: New Zealand Institute 

for Crop & Food Research Ltd. 



‘Needilup’ A 


Agriculture Western Australia, South Perth, WA, Grains 

Research and Development Corporation, Barton, ACT 

and The Grain Pool of WA, Perth, WA. 


PEACE LILY 

Spathiphyllum hybrid 

‘Frederick’ A syn SPFR A 

Application No: 96/127 Grantee: Daniel Cornelis. 


Agent: Burbank Biotechnology Pty Ltd, Tuggerah, NSW. 

POTATO 


‘Smith’s Astra’ A 

Application No: 98/025 Grantee: The Smith’s Snackfood 

Company Limited. 



VIC. 

‘Smith’s Aurora’ A 





VIC. 

‘Smith’s Comet’ A 





VIC. 

‘Smith’s Orion’ A 





VIC. 

‘Smith’s Stellar’ A 





VIC. 

ROSE 

Rosa hybrid 

‘Betsy Taaffe’ A 

Application No: 96/187 Grantee: David Taaffe, Elwood, 

VIC. 


100

GRANTS 


‘My Sweet Honeycomb’ A 

Application No: 97/066 Grantee: John Gordon, Wamboin, 

NSW. 


RYEGRASS, PERENNIAL 

Lolium perenne 

‘Avalon’ A 


Services Pty Ltd, Attwood, VIC. 


SHEOAK, BLACK 

Allocasuarina littoralis 

‘Matuka Silver’ A 

Application No: 95/205 Grantee: Penelope Sinclair, 

Nambour, QLD. 


STATICE 

Limonium perezii 

‘Cosita’ A 

Application No: 97/233 Grantee: RJ Cherry, Kulnura, 

NSW. 


STRAWBERRY 

Fragaria xananassa 

‘Alinta’ A 




‘Euroka’ A 




‘Lowanna’ A 




‘Nonda’ A 




‘Cartuno’ A 

Application No: 95/108 Grantee: Plantas de Navarra SA 

(PLANASA). 


Agent: Nu-Plants Australia, Rochedale, QLD. 

SYNGONIUM 

Syngonium podophyllum 

‘Gold Allusion’ A 

Application No: 97/152 Grantee: Bob Donaldson. 



‘Maria Allusion’ A syn Cherry Allusion A 

Application No: 98/132 Grantee: AgriStarts Inc. 



‘White Holly’ A 

Application No: 97/151 Grantee: Robert Morrison. 



TRITICALE 

xTriticosecale 

‘Heritage Zephyr’ A 

Application No: 98/050 Grantee: New Zealand Institute 

for Crop & Food Research Ltd. 



WHEAT 


‘Ajana’ A 




Barton, ACT. 


‘Brennan’ A 


Canberra, ACT and Grains Research and Development 



‘Tennant’ A 


Canberra, ACT and Grains Research and Development 



101


APPLICATIONS VARIED 

The denomination of the PBR application Medicago sativa 

‘Grasslands Crusader’ (App. No. 96/036) has been 

changed to ‘Grasslands Torlesse’. 

The denomination of the PBR application Medicago sativa 

‘Stirling’ (App. No. 99/073) has been changed to ‘UQL-1’. 

The denomination of the PBR application Syngonium 

podophyllum ‘Holly M’ (App. No. 97/151) has been 

changed to ‘White Holly’. 

The denomination of the PBR application Brassica napus 

‘Emblem’ (App. No. 99/171) has been changed to ‘Ag 

Emblem’. 

The denomination of the PBR application Brassica napus 

‘BLN 1400’ (App. No. 99/161) has been changed to 

‘Ripper’. 

The denomination of the PBR application Triticum aestivum 

‘M5487’ (App. No. 99/163) has been changed to ‘Wylah’. 

For Alstroemeria hybrid ‘Stabelin’ (App. No. 

97/243),‘Stalauli’ (App. No. 97/253) and ‘Testapink’ 

(App. No. 97/245) the original synonyms Belinda, Laura 

and Pink Diamond have been retained respectively. 

The synonym Spring Gold has been deleted from the PBR 

application Prunus persica var. nucipersica ‘Spring Sweet’ 

(App. No. 99/077). 

The Rural Industries Research and Development 

Corporation and Australian Wool Research and 

Promotion Organisation are the joint applicants along 

with the original applicant CLIMA for the PBR application 

Trifolium vesiculosum ‘Cefalu’ (App. No. 97/149). 

The agent for the PBR application Boronia heterophylla 

‘Just Margaret’ (App. No. 92/167) has been changed from 

Proteaflora Enterprises Pty Ltd to Greenhills 

Propagation Nursery Pty Ltd. 

The agent for the PBR applications Scabiosa columbaria 

‘Pink Mist’ (App. No. 92/073) and ‘Butterfly Blue’ (App. 

No. 92/074) has been changed from Colourwise Nursery 

(NSW) Pty Ltd to Koala Blooms Australia. 

The denominations of the following Pelargonium 

applications have been changed to the original UPOV 

registered name to conform to the requirements of 

subsection 27(2) of Plant Breeders Rights Act 1994. The 

current names and synonyms are as follows: 

App No. Variety Name Synonym 

98/008 ‘BFP-838 Dark Red’ Designer Dark Red 

98/011 ‘Pink Heart’ Showcase Pink Heart 

98/012 ‘BFP-788 Bright Designer Bright 

Scarlet’ 

Scarlet 

98/013 ‘BFP-721 Bright Lilac’ Designer Bright Lilac 

The denomination of Brunfelisa latifolia ‘Sweet Petite’ 

(App. No 98/176) has been changed to ‘Sweet & Petite’. 

The denominations of Cicer arietinum ‘T1315’ (App. No. 

97/096) and ‘G846-2-5’ (App. No. 97/097) have been 

changed respectively to ‘Gully’ and ‘Bumper’. 

APPLICATIONS WITHDRAWN 

Actinotus helianthi ‘Federation Star’ (App 98/042) 

Boronia heterophylla ‘Early Red’ (App 98/016) 

Calibrachoa hybrid ‘Liricashower’ (App. No. 98/168) 

Calibrachoa hybrid ‘Liricashower Blue’ (App. No. 

98/169) 

Cupressocyparis leylandii ‘Ferngold’ (App. No. 95/292) 

Euphorbia pulcherrima ‘Moni’ syn Red Fox Moni (App. 

No. 98/256) 

Euphorbia pulcherrima ‘Peterstar Jingle Bells’ (App. No. 

99/018) 

Ficus benjamina ‘Twilight Beauty’ (App. No. 97/165) 

Lilium hybrid ‘Nippon’ (App. No. 95/309) 

Lilium hybrid ‘Colonna’ (App. No. 96/162) 

Lilium hybrid ‘Rosato’ (App. No. 96/163) 

Lilium hybrid ‘Arena’ (App. No. 96/164) 

Lilium hybrid ‘Spinoza’ (App. No. 96/167) 

Lilium hybrid ‘Sartre’ (App. No. 96/168) 

Lilium hybrid ‘Galilei’ (App. No. 96/173) 

Lilium hybrid ‘Bergamo’ (App. No. 96/176) 

Prunus persica ‘Autumn Flame’ (App. No. 99/282) 

Rosa hybrid ‘Benmech’ syn Kate’s Delight (App. No. 

98/159) 

Rosa hybrid ‘Benmfig’ syn Benardella’s Pearl (App. No. 

98/160) 

Sutera cordata ‘Knysna Hills’(App. No. 96/124) 

Sutera cordata ‘Eight Bells’(App. No. 96/125) 

Viola hybrid ‘Major Primrose’ (App. No. 99/291) 

GRANTS SURRENDERED 

Alstroemeria hybrid ‘Stalibla’ syn White Libelle 

(App.No. 89/106) Certificate No. 234 

Alstroemeria hybrid ‘Stalilas’ syn Jubilee 


Alstroemeria hybrid ‘Stalvir’ syn Carola 

(App.No. 89/111) Certificate No. 127 

Alstroemeria hybrid ‘Staronic’ syn Veronia 


Alstroemeria hybrid ‘Starover’ syn Olivia 

(App.No. 89/115) Certificate No. 128 

Alstroemeria hybrid ‘Stapurzul’ syn Azula 


Alstroemeria hybrid ‘Stayeli’ syn Yellow Libelle 


Argyranthemum frutescens ‘Le Rosetta’ 


Argyranthemum frutescens ‘Polly Anna’ 


102


Cupressus sempervirens ‘Gold Pillar’ 


Hordeum vulgare ‘Cask’ syn Ashton 


Hordeum vulgare ‘Empress’ syn 90BE32 

(App.No. 95/128) Certificate No. 981 

Oenothera rosea 

(App.No. 95/242) 

Rosa hybrid 

(App.No. 91/040) 

Rosa hybrid 

(App.No. 93/074) 

‘Ballerina Hot Pink’ syn 

Prima Donna 

Certificate No. 955 

‘Golden Friendship’ syn 

Hartellody 


‘Bruninitial’ syn Brundrett 

Centenary 


Solanum tuberosum ‘Gladiator’ 


Spathiphyllum wallissi ‘Caroline’ 


Triticum aestivum ‘Stiletto’ 


CHANGE OF ASSIGNMENT 

The new owner of the PBR applications Gossypium 

hirsutum ‘DP 5690’ syn Linda (App. No. 93/218) and ‘DP 

5415’ syn Blanca (App. No. 93/219) is D&PL Technology 

Holding Corp. 

The new owners of the PBR application Mangifera indica 

‘B74’ (App. No. 98/018) are The State of Queensland 

through its Department of Primary Industries and 

Promised Land Avocados Pty Ltd. 

The new owners of the following PBR Chamelaucium 

applications are Robert John Ward & Ljubomyra Ward, 

Albert Wetzler & Masako Otani and William John 

Hoffman & Patricia Amy Hester Hoffman, all of 1 Felton 

Road, City Beach, WA 6015. 

Application No. Variety Name Certificate No. 

90/008 ‘White Spring’ 347 

90/009 ‘Eric John’ 348 

90/010 ‘Variegated Blush’ 349 

90/011 ‘Lady Jennifer’ 350 

91/041 ‘Pearl Buttons’ 528 

91/043 ‘Triumphant’ 352 

92/013 ‘Muchea Mauve’ 938 

92/014 ‘Jenny Jane’ 939 

92/015 ‘Jubilee Jade’ 1048 

92/016 ‘Kismet’ 940 

CORRIGENDA 

In PVJ 12(1), in the comparative table (Table 28) of 

description of Lolium perenne ‘Avalon’ p.43, the 

measurement units for flag leaf width and spikelet length 

should be in mm instead of cm. 

In PVJ 12(1), in the comparative tables (Table 15 and 16) 

of descriptions of Pisum sativum ‘Excell’ and ‘Paravic’ 

(p.28-30), the measurement units for pod maximum width 

should be mm instead of cm. 

in PVJ 11(4) p. 49, under the Prior Application and Sales 

heading of Weigela florida ‘Plangen’ the actual date of first 

sale should be 10 Dec 1997 under the name ‘Piccolo’. 

In PVJ 12(2), p. 12, the denomination of Impatiens hybrid 

‘Kilye’ syn Lycia (PBR application No. 99/091) should be 

‘Kilyc’ syn Lycia. 

APPENDIX 1 

FEES 

Two fee structures exist as a result of the transition from 

Plant Variety Rights to Plant Breeders Rights. 

For new applications (those lodged on or after 11 November 

1994) the PBR fees apply. For older applications lodged 

before 11 November 1994 and not finally disposed of 

(Granted, Withdrawn, Refused etc.) the PVR fees in force at 

the time apply. 

If PBR fees for services rendered after 1 July 2000 become 

liable for GST, notifications will be made in this journal and 

appropriate adjustments made to the relevant invoices 

detailing the amount of GST. 

Payment of Fees 

All cheques for fees should be made payable and sent to: 

Collector of Public Monies 

C/-Plant Breeders Rights Office 

GPO Box 858 

Canberra, ACT 2601 

The application fee ($300) must accompany the 

application at the time of lodgement. 

Consequences of not paying fees when due 

Application fee 

Should an application not be accompanied by the prescribed 

application fee the application will be deemed to be ‘nonvalid’ 

and neither assigned an application number nor 

examined for acceptance pending the payment of the fee. 

Examination fee 

Non-payment of the examination fee of an application will 

automatically result, at the end of 12 months from the date 

of acceptance, in a refusal of the application. The 

consequences of refusal are the same as for applications 

deemed to be inactive (see ‘inactive applications’ below). 

103


Field examinations and final examinations falling within the 

first 12 months will not be undertaken without prior 

payment of the examination fee. 

Consideration of a request for an extension of the period of 

provisional protection from the initial 12 month period may 

require the prior payment of the examination fee. 

Certificate fee 

Following the successful completion of the examination, 

including the public notice period, the applicant will be 

required and invoiced to pay the certification fee. Payment 

of the certification fee is a prerequisite to granting PBR and 

issuing the official certificate by the PBR office. Failure to 

pay the fee may result in a refusal to grant PBR. 

Annual fee 

Should an annual renewal fee not be paid within 30 days 

after the due date, the grant of PBR will be revoked under 

Section 50 of the PBR Act. To assist grantees, the PBR 

office will invoice grantees or their Australian agents for 

renewal fees. 

Inactive applications 

An application will be deemed inactive if, after 24 months 

of provisional protection (or 12 months in the case of nonpayment 

of the examination fee) the PBR Office has not 

received a completed application or has not been advised to 

proceed with the examination or an extension of 

provisional protection has not been requested or not 

granted or a certificate fee has not been paid. Inactive 

applications will be examined and, should they not fully 

comply with Section 26 of the PBR Act 1994, they will be 

refused. As a result provisional protection will lapse, 

priority claims on that variety will be lost and should the 

variety have been sold, it will be ineligible for plant variety 

rights on reapplication. Continued use of labels or any 

other means to falsely imply that a variety is protected after 

the application has been refused is an offence under 

Section 53(1) of the Act. 

FEES 

Basic Fees 

Schedule 

A B C D 

$ 

Application 300 300 400 300 

Examination – per application 1400 1200 1400 800 

Certificate 300 300 250 300 

Total Basic Fees 2000 1800 2050 1400 

Annual Renewal – all applications 300 

Schedule 

A Single applications and applications based on an official overseas test reports. 

B Applicable when two or more Part 2 Applications are lodged simultaneously and the varieties are of the same 

genus and the examinations can be completed at one location at the same time. 

C Applications lodged under PVR (prior to 10th Nov 1994) 

D Applicable to 5 or more applications examined at an Accredited Centralised Testing Centre 

Other Fees 

Variation to application(s) – per hour or part thereof 75 

Change of Assignment – per application 100 

Copy of an application (Part 1 and/or Part 2) , an objection 

or a detailed description 50 

Copy of an entry in the Register 50 

Lodging an objection 100 

Annual subscription to Plant Varieties Journal 40 

Back issues of Plant Varieties Journal 14 

Administration – Other work relevant to PBR 

– per hour or part thereof 75 

Application for declaration of essential derivation 800 

Application for 

(a) revocation of a PBR 500 

(b) revocation of a declaration of essential derivation 500 

Compulsory licence 500 

Request under subsection 19(11) for exemption from 

public access – varieties with no direct use as a consumer 

104


APPENDIX 2 

Plant Breeders Rights Advisory Committee (PBRAC) 

(Members of the PBRAC hold office in accordance with 

Section 85 of the Plant Breeder’s Rights Act 1994.) 

Dr Brian Hare 

Director of Research 

Pacific Seeds Australia 

6 Nugent Crescent 

TOOWOOMBA QLD 4350 

Representing Plant Breeders 

Ms Cheryl McCaffery 

Business Development Manager 

UniQuest Limited 

Research Road 

University of Queensland 

ST LUCIA QLD 4072 

Member with appropriate qualifications and experience 

Mr David Moore 

Consultant 

Applied Economic and Technology Services 

PO Box 193 

GAWLER, SA 5118 

Member with appropriate qualifications and experience 

Ms Natalie Peate 

Nursery Owner 

26 Kardinia Crescent 

WARRENWOOD VIC 3134 

Representing consumers 

Mr Hugh Roberts 

Farmer 

‘Birralee’ 

COOTAMUNDRA NSW 2694 

Representing Users 

APPENDIX 3 

INDEX OF ACCREDITED CONSULTANT 

‘QUALIFIED PERSONS’ 

The following persons have been accredited by the Plant 

Breeders Rights office based on information provided by 

these persons. From the information provided by the 

applicants, the PBR office believes that these people can 

fulfil the role of ‘qualified person’ in the application for 

plant breeder’s rights. Neither accreditation nor publication 

of a name in the list of persons is an implicit 

recommendation of the person so listed. The PBR office 

cannot be held liable for damages that may arise from the 

omission or inclusion of a person’s name in the list nor does 

it assume any responsibility for losses or damages arising 

from agreements entered into between applicants and any 

person in the list of accredited persons. Qualified persons 

charge a fee for services rendered. 

A guide to the use of the index of consultants: 

• locate in the left column of Table 1 the plant group for 

which you are applying; 

• listed in the right column are the names of accredited 

qualified persons from which you can choose a 

consultant; 

• in Table 2 find that consultant’s name, telephone number 

and area in which they are willing to consult (they may 

consult outside the nominated area); 

• using the “Nomination of Qualified Person” form as a 

guide, agree provisionally on the scope and terms of the 

consultancy; complete the form and attach it to Part 1 of 

the application form; 

• when you are notified that your nomination of a 

consultant qualified person is acceptable in the letter of 

acceptance of your application for PBR you should 

again consult the qualified person when planning the 

rest of the application for PBR. 

Professor Margaret Sedgley 

Head, Dept. of Horticulture, Viticulture and Oenology 

University of Adelaide 

Waite Campus, PMB 1 

GLEN OSMOND SA 5064 

Representing Plant Breeders 

Mr Doug Waterhouse (Chair) 

Registrar, Plant Breeders Rights 

GPO Box 858 

CANBERRA ACT 2601 

Comments on the technical operation of, or amendments to, 

the Plant Breeder’s Rights Act 1994, particularly 

applications under section 17(2), should be directed through 

the Chairman. 

105


TABLE 1 

PLANT CONSULTANT’S 

GROUP/ NAME 

SPECIES/ (TELEPHONE 

FAMILY AND AREA IN TABLE 2) 

Apple 

Baxter, Leslie 

Darmody, Liz 

Fleming, Graham 

Langford, Garry 

Mackay, Alastair 

Maddox, Zoee 

Malone, Michael 

Mitchell, Leslie 

Pullar, David 

Robinson, Ben 

Scholefield, Peter 

Stearne, Peter 

Tancred, Stephen 

Valentine, Bruce 

Anigozanthos 

Paananen, Ian 

Kirby, Greg 

Aroid 

Azalea 

Harrison, Peter 

Barrett, Mike 

Hempel, Maciej 

Paananen, Ian 

Barley (Common) 

Boyd, Rodger 

Brouwer, Jan 

Collins, David 

Khan, Akram 

Platz, Greg 

Berry Fruit 

Darmody, Liz 


Maddox, Zoee 

Pullar, David 

Robinson, Ben 


Blueberry 

Barthold, Graham 

Pullar, David 

Bougainvillea 

Iredell, Janet Willa 

Brassica 

Buddleia 

Camellia 

Aberdeen, Ian 

Baker, Andrew 

Easton, Andrew 

Chowdhury, Doza 

Cross, Richard 

Fennell, John 

Kadkol, Gururaj 

McMichael, Prue 

Pullar, David 

Robinson, Ben 


Tay, David 

Robb, John 

Paananen, Ian 

Paananen, Ian 

Robb, John 

Cassava 

Cereals 

Cherry 

Chickpeas 

Citrus 

Clover 

Conifer 

Cotton 

Tay, David 

Alam, Rafiul 

Brouwer, Jan 

Bullen, Kenneth 


Cook, Bruce 

Cooper, Kath 


Davidson, James 

Derera, Nicholas AM 

Downes, Ross 

Fennell, John 

Fletcher, Rob 

Gardner, Anne 

Hare, Raymond 


Henry, Robert J 

Khan, Akram 

Kidd, Charles 

Law, Mary Ann 


Oates, John 

Platz, Greg 

Poulsen, David 

Rose, John 

Scattini, Walter John 


Stuart, Peter 

Vertigan, Wayne 

Williams, Warren 

Wilson, Frances 

Darmody, Liz 


Kennedy, Peter 


Maddox, Zoee 


Pullar, David 

Robinson, Ben 


Brouwer, Jan 



Goulden, David 

Edwards, Megan 

Fox, Primrose 

Gingis, Aron 

Lee, Slade 

Maddox, Zoee 


Pullar, David 

Robinson, Ben 


Sykes, Stephen 

Topp, Bruce 

Lake, Andrew 

Miller, Jeff 


Nichols, Phillip 


Alam, Rafiul 


Leske, Richard 

Cucurbits 

Alam, Rafiul 


Herrington, Mark 


Pullar, David 

Robinson, Ben 



Cydonia 


Dogwood 

Darmody, Liz 


Maddox, Zoee 


Feijoa 

Robinson, Ben 


Fig 

Darmody, Liz 

FitzHenry, Daniel 


Maddox, Zoee 

Pullar, David 

Forage Brassicas 


Forage Grasses 

Berryman, Tim 

Bray, Robert 

Fennell, John 


Kirby, Greg 


Slatter, John 

Smith, Kevin 

Forage Legumes 

Bray, Robert 

Fennell, John 

Foster, Kevin 


Lake, Andrew 

Miller, Jeff 

Slatter, John 

Snowball, Richard 

Forest Trees 

Lubomski, Marek 

Fruit 

Beal, Peter 

Darmody, Liz 


Gingis, Aron 

Lenoir, Roland 

Maddox, Zoee 

McCarthy, Alec 


Pullar, David 

Robinson, Ben 


Fungi, Basidiomycetes 

Cairney, John 

Fungi, Entomopathogenic 

Milner, Richard 

Grapes 

Biggs, Eric 

Cirami, Richard 

Darmody, Liz 


106


Gingis, Aron 

Lee, Slade 

Maddox, Zoee 


Pullar, David 

Robinson, Ben 




______________________________ 

Grevillea 


Hydrangea 

Hanger, Brian 

Maddox, Zoee 

Impatiens 

Paananen, Ian 

Jojoba 

Dunstone, Bob 

Legumes 

Aberdeen, Ian 

Bahnisch, L 

Baker, Andrew 

Bray, Robert 



Cook, Bruce 

Downes, Ross 

Foster, Kevin 


Imrie, Bruce 

Kirby, Greg 

Knights, Edmund 

Lake, Andrew 

Law, Mary Ann 

Loch, Don 


Nutt, Bradley 

Rose, John 


Lentils 

Brouwer, Jan 




Lucerne 

Lake, Andrew 


Bray, Robert 


Lupin 


Magnolia 

Paananen, Ian 

Maize 

Slatter, John 

Myrtaceae 

Dunstone, Bob 

Native grasses 

Quinn, Patrick 

Waters, Cathy 

Neem 

Friend, Joe 

Oat 


Khan, Akram 

Platz, Greg 

Oilseed crops 

Downes, Ross 

Kidd, Charles 


Slatter, John 

Olives 

Bazzani, Mr Luigi 

Gingis, Aron 

Pullar, David 

Onions 


Fennell, John 

Gingis, Aron 


Pullar, David 

Robinson, Ben 


Ornamentals – Exotic 

Abell, Peter 

Armitage, Paul 

Angus, Tim 

Barth, Gail 

Beal, Peter 

Collins, Ian 

Cooling, Beth 


Cunneen, Thomas 

Darmody, Liz 

Dawson, Iain 


Fisk, Anne Marie 

Fitzhenry, Daniel 


Gingis, Aron 


Hempel, Maciej 

Johnston, Margaret 

Kirkham, Roger 

Kwan, Brian 

Larkman, Clive 


Lowe, Greg 

Lubomski, Marek 

Lunghusen, Mark 

Maddox, Zoee 



Nichols, David 

Oates, John 

Paananen, Ian 

Robb, John 

Robinson, Ben 


Singh, Deo 


Stewart, Angus 

Tay, David 

Van der Ley, John 

Washer, Stewart 

Watkins, Phillip 

Winfield, Joel 

Ornamentals – Indigenous 

Abell, Peter 

Allen, Paul 

Angus, Tim 

Barrett, Mike 

Barth, Gail 

Beal, Peter 

Cooling, Beth 

Cunneen, Thomas 

Dawson, Iain 


Downes, Ross 


Henry, Robert J 

Hockings, David 

Jack, Brian 

Johnston, Margaret 

Kirby, Greg 



Lowe, Greg 

Lullfitz, Robert 

Lunghusen, Mark 


Molyneux, W M 


Oates, John 

Paananen, Ian 

Robinson, Ben 


Singh, Deo 


Tan, Beng 

Watkins, Phillip 

Winfield, Joel 

Worrall, Ross 

Ornithopus 

Foster, Kevin 


Nutt, Bradley 


Osmanthus 

Paananen, Ian 

Robb, John 

Pastures & Turf 

Aberdeen, Ian 

Anderson, Malcolm 

Avery, Angela 

Bahnisch, L 

Berryman, Tim 

Cameron, Stephen 

Cook, Bruce 

Downes, Ross 

Gellert, Valerie 


Kaapro, Jyri 

Kirby, Greg 

Loch, Don 

Miller, Jeff 


Rawstron, Jane 

Rose, John 

Smith, Raymond 

Scattini, Walter John 

Slatter, John 

Smith, Kevin 


Wilson, Frances 

Peanut 

Pear 

George, Doug 

Tay, David 


Darmody, Liz 


Langford, Garry 


Maddox, Zoee 


Pullar, David 

Robinson, Ben 


107


Tancred, Stephen 


Petunia 

Paananen, Ian 


Photinia 

Robb, John 

Pistacia 

Pullar, David 

Richardson, Clive 


Pisum 

Brouwer, Jan 




Potatoes 

Baker, Andrew 


Fennell, John 



Pullar, David 

Robinson, Ben 



Tay, David 

Proteaceae 

Barth, Gail 

Kirby, Neil 

Robb, John 

Robinson, Ben 


Pseudocereals 

Fletcher, Rob 

Pulse Crops 

Bestow, Sue 

Brouwer, Jan 




Fletcher, Rob 

Kidd, Charles 

Oates, John 


Slatter, John 

Prunus 

Darmody, Liz 



Maddox, Zoee 


Porter, Gavin 

Pullar, David 

Topp, Bruce 

Raspberry 


Darmody, Liz 


Martin, Stephen 

Pullar, David 

Robinson, Ben 


Rhododendron 

Barrett, Mike 

Paananen, Ian 

Roses 

Barrett, Mike 


Darmody, Liz 

Fitzhenry, Daniel 


Fox, Primrose 

Gingis, Aron 

Hanger, Brian 

Lee, Peter 

Maddox, Zoee 

Prescott, Chris 

Robinson, Ben 



Swane, Geoff 

Syrus, A Kim 

Van der Ley, John 

Sesame 

Bennett, Malcolm 


Imrie, Bruce 

Sorghum 

Khan, Akram 

Slatter, John 

Soybean 

Andrews, Judith 


James, Andrew 

Spices and Medicinal Plants 


Pullar, David 

Stone Fruit 

Barrett, Mike 

Darmody, Liz 


Mackay, Alistair 

Maddox, Zoee 


Pullar, David 

Robinson, Ben 



Strawberry 


Gingis, Aron 




Morrison, Bruce 

Porter, Gavin 

Pullar, David 

Robinson, Ben 


Zorin, Clara 

Sugarcane 

Cox, Mike 

Morgan, Terence 

Tay, David 

Sunflower 

George, Doug 

Tomato 


Gingis, Aron 




Pullar, David 

Robinson, Ben 


Tree Crops 

Friend, Joe 

McRae, Tony 

Triticale (x Triticosecale Wittmack) 


Tropical/Sub-Tropical Crops 

Fletcher, Rob 


Kulkarni, Vinod 

Paulin, Robert 

Pullar, David 

Robinson, Ben 


Tay, David 

Winston, Ted 

Umbrella Tree 

Paananen, Ian 

Vegetables 

Alam, Rafiul 

Baker, Andrew 

Beal, Peter 



Fennell, John 

Frkovic, Edward 

Gingis, Aron 





Oates, John 

Pearson, Craig 

Pullar, David 

Robinson, Ben 


Scott, Peter 

Tay, David 

Westra Van Holthe, Jan 

Verbena 

Paananen, Ian 

Wheat (Aestivum & Durum Groups) 

Brouwer, Jan 


Gardner, Anne 

Khan, Akram 

Platz, Greg 

108


TABLE 2 

NAME TELEPHONE AREA OF OPERATION 

Abel, Peter 02 9351 8825 

02 9351 8875 fax New South Wales 

Aberdeen, Ian 03 5782 1029 

03 5782 2073 fax SE Australia 

Alam, Rafiul 07 5460 1184 

07 5460 1112 fax SE QLD 

Allen, Paul 07 3824 0263 ph/fax SE QLD, Northern NSW 

Anderson, Malcolm 03 5573 0900 

03 5571 1523 fax 

017 870 252 mobile Victoria 

Andrews, Judith 02 6951 2614 

02 6955 7580 fax Southern NSW, Northern VIC 

Angus, Tim 02 4751 5702 ph/fax Australia and New Zealand 

Armitage, Paul 03 9756 7233 

03 9756 6948 fax Victoria 

Avery, Angela 02 6030 4500 

02 6030 4600 fax South Eastern Australia 

Bahnisch, L 07 5460 1457 

07 5460 1204 fax Australia 

Baker, Andrew 03 6427 8553 

03 6427 8554 fax Tasmania 

Barrett, Mike 02 9875 3087 

02 9980 1662 fax 

0407 062 494 mobile NSW/ACT 

Barth, Gail 08 8303 9580 

08 8303 9424 fax SA and Victoria 

Barthold, Graham 03 5997 1413 

03 5942 5132 fax Southern Victoria 

Baxter, Leslie 03 6224 4481 

03 6224 4468 fax 

0181 21943 mobile Tasmania 

Bazzani, Luigi 08 9772 1207 

08 9772 1333 fax Western Australia 

Beal, Peter 07 3286 1488 

07 3286 3094 fax QLD & Northern NSW 

Bennett, Malcolm 08 8973 9733 

08 8973 9777 fax NT, QLD, NSW, WA 

Berryman, Tim 

02 6272 9662 ph/fax 

0427 894 266 mobile ACT region 

Bestow, Sue 02 6795 4050 

02 6795 3358 fax 

0152 54695 mobile Australia 

Biggs, Eric 03 5023 2400 

03 5023 3922 fax Mildura Area 

Boyd, Rodger 08 9380 2553 


Bray, Robert 07 3378 3158 QLD & Northern NSW 

Brouwer, Jan 03 5362 2159 

03 5362 2187 fax South Eastern Australia 

Cairney, John 02 9685 9903 Sydney 

j.cairney@nepean.uws.edu.au 

Chowdhury, Doza 08 8303 7227 

08 8303 7109 fax South Australia and Victoria 

Cirami, Richard 08 8562 8273 

08 8562 8415 fax Australia 

Collins, David 08 9622 6100 Central Western 

08 9622 1902 fax Wheatbelt of Western 


Cooling, Beth 

07 5533 2277 ph/fax 

0414 533301 mobile Gilston, Queensland 

Cooper, Katharine 08 8303 6563 


Cox, Mike 07 4132 5200 

07 4132 5253 fax Queensland and NSW 

Croft, Valerie 03 5573 0900 


Cross, Richard 64 3 325 6400 

64 3 325 2074 fax New Zealand 

Cunneen, Thomas 02 4889 8647 

02 4889 8657 fax Sydney Region 

Darmody, Liz 03 9756 6105 


Davidson, James 02 6246 5071 High rainfall zone of 

02 6246 5399 fax temperate Australia 

Dawson, Iain 02 6251 2293 ACT, South East NSW 

Derera, Nicholas AM 02 9639 3072 

02 9639 0345 fax 

0414 639 307 mobile Australia 

Downes, Ross 

02 6255 1461 ph 

02 6278 4676 fax 

0414 955258 mobile ACT, South East Australia 

Dunstone, Bob 02 6281 1754 ph/fax South East NSW 

Easton, Andrew 07 4690 2666 

07 4630 1063 fax QLD and NSW 

Edwards, Megan 03 5024 5960 

03 5024 7470 fax 

0418 532 354 VIC/NSW 

Fennell, John 03 5334 7871 

03 5334 7892 fax 

0419 881 887 Australia 

FitzHenry, Daniel 02 4862 2487 ph/fax Sydney and 

0417 891 651 mobile surrounding districts 

Fleming, Graham 03 9756 6105 


Fletcher, Rob 07 5465 4126 

07 5460 1112 fax Australia 

Foster, Kevin 08 9368 3670 Mediterranean areas of 


Friend, Joe 02 6688 6150 ph/fax Northern QLD & NSW 

Frkovic, Edward 02 6962 7333 


Gardner, Anne 02 6238 3536 Australia, New Zealand 

George, Doug 07 5460 1308 


Gellert, Valerie 03 5573 0900 


Gingis, Aron 03 9887 6120 

03 9769 1522 fax Victoria, South Australia 

0419 878658 mobile and Southern NSW 

Goulden, David 64 3 325 6400 


Hanger, Brian 03 9756 7532 

03 9756 6684 fax 

03 9752 0603 fax 

0418 598106 mobile Victoria 

Hare, Ray 02 6763 1232 

02 6763 1222 fax QLD, NSW VIC & SA 

Harrison, Peter 08 8948 1894 ph Tropical/Sub-tropical 

08 8948 3894 fax Australia, including NT and 

0407 034 083 mobile NW WA and tropical arid areas 

Hempel, Maciej 02 4628 0376 

02 4625 2293 fax NSW, QLD, VIC, SA 

Henry, Robert J 02 6620 3010 


Herrington, Mark 07 5441 2211 

07 5441 2235 fax Southern Queensland 

Hockings, David 07 5494 3385 ph/fax Southern Queensland 

Imrie, Bruce 02 4471 2976 

0409 266762 SE Australia 

Iredell, Janet Willa 07 3202 6351 ph/fax SE Queensland 

Jack, Brian 08 9952 5040 

08 9952 5053 fax South West WA 

James, Andrew 07 3214 2278 


Johnston, Margaret 07 5460 1240 

07 5460 1455 fax SE Queensland 

Kaapro, Jyri 02 9637 8711 

02 9637 8599 fax Sydney and surrounding areas 

Kadkol, Gururaj 03 5382 1269 

03 5381 1210 fax North Western Victoria 

Kennedy, Peter 02 6382 1077 


Khan, Akram 02 9351 8821 


Kidd, Charles 08 8842 3591 

08 8842 3066 fax 

0417 336 458 mobile Southern Australia 

Kirby, Greg 08 8201 2176 

08 8201 3015 fax South Australia 

Kirby, Neil 02 4754 2637 


Kirkham, Roger 03 5957 1200 

03 5957 1210 fax 

0153 23713 mobile Victoria 

Knights, Edmund 02 6763 1100 

02 6763 1222 fax North Western NSW 

Kulkarni, Vinod 08 9992 2221 


Kwan, Brian 03 5943 1088 


Lake, Andrew 08 8177 0558 

0418 818 798 mobile 

lake@arcom.com.au SE Australia 

Langford, Garry 03 6266 4344 

03 6266 4023 fax 

0418 312 910 mobile Australia 

Larkman, Clive 03 9735 3831 

03 9739 6370 

larkman@tpgi.com.au Victoria 

Law, Mary Ann 07 4638 4322 

07 4638 4271 fax Toowoomba region 

Lee, Peter 03 6330 1147 


109


Lee, Slade 02 6620 3410 Queensland/Northern 


Lenoir, Roland 02 6231 9063 ph/fax Australia 

Leske, Richard 07 4671 3136 Cotton growing regions of 

07 4671 3113 fax QLD & NSW 

Loch, Don 07 5482 1522 

07 5482 1529 fax Queensland 

Lowe, Greg 02 4389 8750 

02 4389 4958 fax 

0411 327390 mobile Sydney, Central Coast NSW 

Lubomski, Marek 07 5525 3023 ph/fax NSW & QLD 

Lullfitz, Robert 08 9447 6360 South West WA 

Lunghusen, Mark 03 9752 0477 

03 9752 0028 fax 

0407 050 133 mobile Melbourne & environs 


08 9310 5342 ph/fax 

0159 87221 mobile Western Australia 

Maddox, Zoee 03 9756 6105 


Malone, Michael +64 6 877 8196 

+64 6 877 4761 fax New Zealand 

Martin, Stephen 03 6231 2489 

03 6231 4508 fax 

0418 500198 mobile Tasmania 

McCarthy, Alec 08 9780 6273 

08 9780 6136 fax South West WA 

McMichael, Prue 08 8373 2488 


McRae, Tony 08 8723 0688 


Miller, Jeff 

Milner, Richard 02 6246 4169 

02 6246 4042 fax 

64 6 356 8019 extn 8027 Manawatu region, 


richardm@ento.csiro.au Australia 

Mitchell, Leslie 03 5821 2021 

03 5831 1592 fax VIC, Southern NSW 

Molyneux, William 03 5965 2011 


Morgan, Terence 07 4783 6000 


Morrison, Bruce 03 9210 9251 

03 9800 3521 fax East of Melbourne 

Nichols, David 03 5977 4755 SE Melbourne, Mornington 

03 5977 4921 fax Peninsula and Dandenong 

Ranges, Victoria 

Nichols, Phillip 08 9387 7442 


Nutt, Bradley 08 9387 7423/ 


Oates, John 02 4651 2601 Sydney region, Eastern 


Paananen, Ian 02 4381 0051 

02 4381 0071 fax 

0412 826589 mobile Sydney/Newcastle 

Paulin, Robert 08 9368 3308 

08 9367 2625 fax 

0191 07244 mobile South West Western Australia 

Platz, Greg 07 4639 8817 

07 4639 8800 fax QLD, Northern NSW 

Porter, Gavin 07 5460 1231 

07 5460 1455 fax SE QLD, Northern NSW 

Poulsen, David 07 4661 2944 


Prescott, Chris 

03 5964 2780 ph/fax 

0417 340 558 mobile Victoria 

Pullar, David 03 5822 2222 

03 5822 2200 fax 

0418 575 444 mobile Australia 

Quinn, Patrick 03 5427 0485 SE Australia 

Rawstron, Jane 03 6336 5219 


Richardson, Clive 03 5155 0255 

03 5143 2168 New South Wales and Victoria 

Robb, John 02 4376 1330 

02 4376 1271 fax 

0199 19252 mobile Sydney, Central Coast NSW 

Robinson, Ben 08 8373 2488 


Rose, John 07 4661 2944 


Scattini, Walter 07 3356 0863 ph/fax Tropical and sub-tropical 


Scholefield, Peter 08 8373 2488 

08 8373 2442 fax 

018 082022 mobile SE Australia 

Scott, Peter 02 9653 1362 

02 9653 1072 fax Sydney region 

Singh, Deo 

0418 88078 mobile 

07 3207 5998 fax Brisbane 

Slatter, John 07 4635 0726 

07 4635 2772 fax 


Smith, Kevin 03 5573 0900 


Smith, Stuart 03 6336 5234 


Snowball, Richard 08 9368 3517 Mediterranean areas of 


Stearne, Peter 02 9262 2611 

02 9262 1080 fax Sydney, ACT & NSW 

Stewart, Angus 02 4325 3944 ph/fax Sydney, Gosford 

Stuart, Peter 07 4690 2666 


Swane, Geoff 02 6889 1545 

02 6889 2533 fax 

0419 841580 mobile Central western NSW 

Sykes, Stephen 03 5051 3100 


Syrus, A Kim 03 8556 2555 

03 8556 2955 fax Adelaide 

Tan, Beng 08 9266 7168 

08 9266 2495 Perth & environs 

Tancred, Stephen 07 4681 2931 

07 4681 4274 fax 

0157 62888 mobile QLD, NSW 

Tay, David 07 5460 1313 


Topp, Bruce 07 4681 1255 


Valentine, Bruce 02 6361 3919 


Van Der Ley, John 02 6561 5047 

02 6561 5138 fax Sydney to Brisbane and 

0417 423 768 mobile New England area 

Vertigan, Wayne 03 6336 5221 


Washer, Stewart 08 9300 9995 

08 9407 5070 fax 

0196 83642 mobile Western Australia 

Waters, Cathy 02 6888 7404 


Watkins, Phillip 08 9525 1800 

08 9525 1607 fax Perth Region 

Westra Van Holthe, Jan 03 9706 3033 



64 6 356 8019 NZ 

02 6356 8019 AUS 

02 6351 8047 fax AUS New Zealand 

Wilson, Frances 64 3 318 8514 

64 3 318 8549 fax Canterbury, New Zealand 

Winfield, Joel 03 9737 9660 Victoria 

Winston, Ted 

07 4068 8796 ph/fax 

0412 534 514 mobile QLD, Northern NSW and NT 

Worrall, Ross 02 4348 1900 


Zorin, Clara 

07 3207 4306 ph/fax 

0418 984 555 Eastern Australia 

110


APPENDIX 4 

INDEX OF ACCREDITED NON- 

CONSULTANT ‘QUALIFIED 

PERSONS’ 

Name 

Allen, Antony 

Ali, S 

Baelde, Arie 

Barr, Andrew 

Beatson, Ron 

Bell, David 

Birmingham, Erika 

Brennan, Paul 

Breust, P 

Brewer, L 

Brindley, Tony 

Buchanan, Peter 

Bunker, John 

Bunker, Kerry 

Burton, Wayne 

Cameron, Nick 

Chin, Robert 

Chivers, Ian 

Clayton- Greene, Kevin 

Coker, Julian 

Constable, Greg 

Cook, Esther 

Cooper, Kath 

Costin, Russell 

Cox, Michael 

Craig, Andrew 

Crane, Peter 

Cruickshank, Alan 

Cummings, Dale 

Dale, Gary 

Davidson, Jim 

Dear, Brian 

de Betue, Remco 

Done, Anthony 

Donnelly, Peter 

Downe, Graeme 

Eastwood, Russell 

Eisemann, Robert 

Elliott, Philip 

Enneking, Dirk 

Fiffer, Sue 

Foster, Pauline 

Gibson, Peter 

Gomme, Simon 

Granger, Andrew 

Green, Allan 

Guy, Graeme 

Hall, Nicola 

Harden, Patrick 

Hart, Ray 

Higgs, Robert 

Hill, Jeffrey 

Hollamby, Gil 

Holland, Mark 

Hoppo, Sue 

Howie, Jake 

Huxley, Ian 

Irwin, John 

Jackson, B 

Jaeger, M 

Johnston, Christine 

Jupp, Noel 

Kaehne, Ian 

Katelaris, A 

Kebblewhite, Tony 

Kennedy, Chris 

Kimbeng, Collins 

Knight, Ronald 

Knights, Ted 

Knox, Graham 

Kobelt, Eric 

Langbein, Sueanne 

Leonforte, Tony 

Lewin, Laurence 

Lewis, Hartley 

Liu, Chunji 

Loi, Angelo 

Luckett, David 

Lullfitz, Robert 

Macleod, Nick 

Mann, Dorham 

Mason, Lloyd 

Mcdonald, David 

Mcmaugh, P 

Mendham, Neville 

Menzies, Kim 

Milne, Carolyn 

Moody, David 

Moore, Stephen 

Neilson, Peter 

Newman, Allen 

Norriss, Michael 

Oakes, John 

Offord, Cathy 

Oram, Rex 

Patel, Narandra 

Paull, Jeff 

Pearce, Bob 

Peppe, Ivan 

Perrott, Neil 

Pymer, Sally 

Reid, Peter 

Richardson, Maureen 

Rose, Ian 

Salmon, Alexander 

Sammon, Noel 

Sandral, Graeme 

Sanewski, Garth 

Schreuders, Harry 

Scott, Ralph 

Smith, Michael 

Smith, Raymond 

Smith, Sue 

Song, Leonard 

Tonks, John 

Toyer, Christine 

Titley, Michael 

Trimboli, Daniel 

Turner, Matthew 

Vaughan, Peter 

Weatherly, Lilia 

Whalley, R.D.B. 

Whiley, Tony 

Williams, Rex 

Wilson, Rob 

Wilson, Stephen 

Witherspoon, Jennifer 

Yan, Guijun 

Zeppa, Aldo 

APPENDIX 5 

ADDRESSES OF UPOV AND 

MEMBER STATES 

International Union for the 

Protection of New Varieties of 

Plants (UPOV): 

International Union for the Protection 

of New Varieties of Plants (UPOV) 

34, Chemin des Colombettes 

CH-1211 

Geneva 20 

SWITZERLAND 

Phone: (41-22) 338 9111 

Fax: (41-22) 733 0336 

Web site: http://www.upov.int 

Plant Variety Protection Offices in 

individual UPOV Member States: 

ARGENTINA 

Instituto Nacional de Semillas 

Ministerio de Economia 

Secretaria de Agricultura 

Ganaderia y Pesca 

Avda. Paseo Colon 922-3. 

Piso, 1063 Buenos Aires 

Phone: (54 1) 362 39 88 

Fax: (54 1) 349 24 17 

AUSTRALIA 

Registrar 

Plant Breeders Rights Office 

P O Box 858 

Canberra ACT 2601 

Phone: ( 61 2) 6272 3888 

Fax: (61 2) 6272 3650 

AUSTRIA 

Bundesamt und Forschungszentrum 

fur Landwirtschaft 

Sortenschutzamt 

Postfach 400 

Spargelfeldstrasse 191 

A- 1226 Wien 

Phone: (43 1) 73216 4000 

Fax: (43 1) 73216 4211 

111


BELGIUM 

Ministere de classes moyennes et de 

l’agriculture 

Service de la protection des obtentions 

vegetales et des catalogues nationaux 

Tour WTC/3- 6eme etage 

Avenue Simon Bolivar 30 

B-1000 Bruxelles 

Phone: (32 2) 208 37 28 

Fax: (32 2) 208 37 05 

BOLIVIA 

Direccion Nacional de Semillas 

Secretaria Nacional De Agricultural y 

Ganaderia 

Avda. 6 de Agosto 2006, Edif. V. 

Centenario 

Casilla 4793 

La Paz 

Phone (591-2) 391 953 

Fax: (591-2) 391 953 

BRAZIL 

Servico Nacional de Protecao de 

Cultivares-SNPC 

(National Plant Varieties Protection 

Service) 

Secretaria de Desenvolvimento Rural- 

SDR 

Ministerio da Agricultura e do 

Abastedimento 

Esplanada dos Ministerios, Bloco D, 

Anexo A 

Terreo, Sala 1-12 

CEP 70043-900, Brasilia, DF 

Phone: (55-61) 218-2433 

Fax: (55-61) 224 2842 

BULGARIA 

Patent Office of the Republic of 

Bulgaria 

52 B, Dr. G. M. Dimitrov Blvd. 

1113 Sofia 

Phone: (359-2) 710 152 

Fax: (359-2) 708 325 

CANADA 

The Commissioner 

Plant Breeders’ Rights Office 

Canadian Food Inspection Agency 

(CFIA) 

3rd Floor, East Court 

Camelot Court 

59 Camelot Drive 

Nepean, Ontario 

K1A OY9 

Phone: (1 613) 225 2342 

Fax: (1 613) 228 6629 

112 

CHILE 

Ministerio de Agricultura 

Servicio Agricola y Ganadero 

Department de Semillas 

Casilla 1167-21 

Santiago de Chile 

Phone: (56 2) 696 29 96 

Fax: (56 2) 696 64 80 

CHINA 

The Office for the Protection of New 

Varieties of Plants 

Ministry of Agriculture 

11 Non Zhan Guan Nan Li 

Beijing 10026 

Phone: (86-10) 6419 3079 

Fax: (86-10) 6419 2451 

COLOMBIA 

Instituto Colombiano Agropecuario 

(I.C.A) 

Division de Semillas 

Calle 37 No. 8-43 

Santa Fe de Bogota 

Phone: (57 1) 232 4697 

Fax: (57 1) 232 4695 

CZECH REPUBLIC 


External Relations Department 

Tesnov 17 

117 05 Prague 1 

Phone: (42) 2 2181 2474 

Fax: (42) 2 2181 2970 

DENMARK 

Afdeling for Sortsafprovning 

Postbox 7 

Teglvaerksvej 10, Tystofte 

DK-4230 Skaelskoer 

Phone: (45) 53 59 61 41 

Fax: (45) 53 59 01 66 

ECUADOR 

División de Insumos 

Ministerio de Agricultura y Ganadería 

Avenida Eloy Alfaro y Amazonas 

Quito 

Phone: (593-2) 543 763 

Fax: (593-2) 504 833 

FINLAND 

Plant Variety Board 

Plant Variety Rights Office 

PO Box 232 

SF-00171 Helsinki 

Phone: (358) 01 60 33 16 

Fax: (358) 01 60 24 43 

FRANCE 

Comite de la protection des obtentions 

vegetales 

11, rue Jean Nicot 

F-75007 Paris 

Phone: (331) 42 75 93 14 

Fax: (331) 42 75 94 25 

GERMANY 

Bundessortenamt 

Postfach 61 04 40 

D-30604 Hannover 

Phone: (49 511) 95 66 5 

Fax: (49 511) 56 33 62 

HUNGARY 

Hungarian Patent Office 

Magyar Szabadalmi Hivatal 

Garibaldi-u.2-B.P. 552 

H-1370 Budapest 

Phone: (36 1) 112 44 00 

Fax: (36 1) 131 25 96 

IRELAND 

Controller of Plant Breeders’ Rights 

Department of Agriculture and Food 

Backweston 

Leixlip 

Co. Kildare 

Phone: (353) 1 628 0608 

Fax: (353) 1 628 0634 

ISRAEL 

Plant Breeders’ Rights Council 

The Volcani Center 

PO Box 6 

Bet-Dagan 50 250 

Phone: (972) 3 968 3669 

Fax: (972) 3 968 34 92 

ITALY 

Ufficio Italiano Brevetti e Marchi 

Ministero dell’Industria, del 

Commercio e dell’Artigianato 

19,via Molise 

I-00187 Roma 

Phone: (39 6) 47 05 1 

Fax: (39 6) 47 05 30 35 

JAPAN 

Director of Seeds and Seedlings 

Division 

Agricultural Production Bureau 

Ministry of Agriculture, Forestry and 

Fisheries 

1-2-1 Kasumigaseki – Chiyoda-ku 

Tokyo 100 

Phone: (81 3) 35 91 05 24 

Fax: (81 3) 35 02 65 72


KENYA 

Plant Breeder’s Rights Office 

Kenya Plant Health Inspectorate 

Service (KEPHIS) 

Headquarters 

Waiyaki Way 

PO Box 49592 

Nairobi 

Tel: (254 –1) 44 40 29 

Fax: (254-2) 44 80 40 

MEXICO 

Servicio Nacional de Inspection y 

Certification de Semillas – SNICS 

Secretaria de Agricultura, Ganaderia y 

Desarrollo Rural 

Lope de Vega 125 8 . Piso 

Col. Capultepec Morales 

México, D.F. 11570 

Phone: (52-5) 203 9427 

Fax: (52-5) 250 64 83 

NETHERLANDS 

Raad voor het Kwekersrecht 

(Borad of Plant Breeder’s Rights) 

Postbus 104 

NL-6700 AC Wageningen 

Phone: (31 317) 47 80 90 

Fax: (31 317) 42 58 67 

NEW ZEALAND 

Commissioner of Plant Variety Rights 

Plant Variety Rights Office 

PO Box 130 

Lincoln, Canterbury 

Phone: (64 3) 325 63 55 

Fax: (64 3) 325 29 46 

NORWAY 

Planteosortsnemnda 

(The Plant Variety Board) 

Fellesbygget 

N-1432 As 

Phone: (47) 64 94 75 04 

Fax: (47) 64 94 02 08 

PANAMA 

Direccion General del Registro 

De la Propiedad Industrial 

(DIGERPI)\ 

Ministerio de Coercio e Industrias 

Apartado 9658- Zona 4 

Panama 4 

Phone: (507) 227 3987 

Fax: (507) 227 2139 

PARAGUAY 

Ministerio de Agricultura y Ganaderia 

Direccion de Semillas (DISE) 

Gaspar R. de Francia No. 685 

c/ Mcal. Estigarribia 

San Lorenzo 

Phone: (595) 21 58 22 01 

Fax: (595) 21 58 46 45 

POLAND 

The Director 

Research Center of Cultivars Testing 

(COBORU) 

63-022 Slupia Wielka 

Phone: (48 667) 535 58 or 523 41 

Fax: (48 667) 535 58 

PORTUGAL 

Centro Nacional de Registo de 

Variedades Protegidas (CENARVE) 

Edificio II da CNPPA 

Tapada da Ajuda 

P-1300 Lisboa 

Phone: (351) 1 362 16 07 

Fax: ( 351) 1 362 16 06 

REPUBLIC OF MOLDOVA 

State Commission for Crops Variety 

Testing and Registration 


Bul. Stefan Cel Mare 162 

C.P. 1873 

2004 Chisinau 

Phone: (373-2) 24 62 22 

Fax: (373-2) 24 69 21 

RUSSIAN FEDERATION 

State Commission of the Russian 

Federation 

for Selection Achievements Test and 

Protection 

Orlicov per., 3a 

107139 Moscow 

Phone: (70-95) 204 49 26 

Fax: (70-95) 207 86 26 

SLOVAKIA 


Dodrovicova 12 

812 66 Bratislava 

Phone: (42) 736 85 61 

Fax: (42) 745 62 94 

SLOVENIA 

Ministry of Agriculture, Forestry and 

Food 

Dunajska 

1000 Ljubljana 

Phone: (386-61) 178 9117 

Fax: (386-61) 178 9120 

SOUTH AFRICA 

National Department of Agriculture 

Directorate of Plant and Quality 

Control 

Private Bag X 258 

Pretoria 0001 

Phone: (27 12) 319 7202 

Fax: (27 12) 319 7279 

SPAIN 

Registro de Variedades 

Subdireccion General de Semillas y 

Plantas de Vivero 

Jose Abascal, 4 

E-280003- Madrid 

Phone: (34 1) 347 66 00 

Fax: (34 1) 594 27 68 

SWEDEN 

Statens vaxtsortnamnd 

(National Plant Variety Board) 

Box 1247 

S-171 24 Solna 

Phone: (46) 8 783 12 60 

Fax: (46) 8 833 170 

SWITZERLAND 

Bundesamt fur Landwirtschaft 

Buro fur Sortenschutz 

Mattenhofstr. 5 

CH-3003 Bern 

Phone: (41 31) 322 25 24 

Fax: (41 31) 322 26 34 

TRINIDAD AND TOBAGO 

Controller (Ag) 

Intellectual Property Office 

Ministry of Legal Affairs 

34 Frederick Street 

Port of Spain 

Phone: (1 868) 625 9972 

Fax: (1 868) 624 1221 

UKRAINE 

State Patent Office of Ukraine 

8 Lvov Square 

254655 Kiev 53, GSP- 655 

Phone: (880 44) 212 50 82 

Fax: (880 44) 212 34 49 

UNITED KINGDOM 

The Plant Variety Rights Office 

White House Lane 

Huntingdon Road 

Cambridge CB3 OLF 

113


Phone: (44 1223) 34 23 81 

Fax: (44 1223) 34 23 86 

UNITED STATES OF AMERICA 

(For PVP) 

The Commissioner 

Plant Variety Protection Office 

Agricultural Marketing Service 

Department of Agriculture 

Beltsville, Maryland 20705-2351 

Phone: ( 1 301) 504 55 18 

Fax: (1 301) 504 52 91 

(For Plant Patent) 

The Commissioner of Patents and 

Trademarks 

Patent and Trade Mark Office 

Box 4 

Washington DC 20231 

Phone: ( 1 703) 305 93 00 

Fax: (1 703) 305 88 85 

URUGUAY 

Ministerio de Ganaderia, Agricultura 

y Pesca 

Direccion General -Servicios 

Agricolas 

Unidad de Semillas 

Ava. Milan 4703 

12.900 Montevideo 

Phone: (59 82) 309 79 24 

Fax: ( 59 82) 39 60 53 

EUROPEAN UNION 

(for applications filed within the EU) 

Japan 3 

Community Plant Variety Office 

P.O. Box 2141 

F-49021 Angers Cedex 

FRANCE 

Phone: ( 33 2) 41 36 84 50 

Fax: ( 33 2) 41 36 84 60 

CURRENT STATUS OF PLANT 

VARIETY PROTECTION 

LEGISLATURE IN UPOV 

MEMBER COUNTRIES 

Argentina 2 

Australia 3 

Austria 2,4 

Belgium 1,4 

Bolivia 2 

Brazil 2 

Bulgaria 3 

Canada 2 

Chile 2 

China 2 

Columbia 2 

Czech Republic 2 

Denmark 3,4 

Ecuador 2 

Finland 2,4 

France 2,4 

Germany 3,4 

Hungary 2 

Ireland 2,4 

Israel 3 

Italy 2,4 

Kenya 2 

Mexico 2 

Netherlands 3,4 

New Zealand 2 

Norway 2 

Panama 2 

Paraguay 2 

Poland 2.5 

Portugal 2.4 

Republic of Moldova 3 

Russian Federation 3 

Slovakia 2,5 

Slovenia 5 

South Africa 2,5 

Spain 1,4 

Sweden 3,4 

Switzerland 2 

Trinidad and Tobago 2 

Ukraine 2 

United Kingdom 3,4 

USA 3 

Uruguay 2 

(Total 44) 

1 Bound by the 1961 Act as amended by the 

Additional Act of 1972. 

2 Bound by the 1978 Act. 

3 Bound by the 1991 Act. 

4 Member of the European Community 

which has introduced a (supranational) 

Community plant variety rights system 

based upon the 1991 Act. 

5 Has already amended its law to conform to 

the 1991 Act; most other states are in the 

process of doing so. 

APPENDIX 6 

CENTRALISED TESTING CENTRES 

Under Plant Breeder’s Rights Regulations introduced in 

1996, establishments may be officially authorised by the 

PBR office to conduct test growings. An authorised 

establishment will be known as Centralised Test Centre 

(CTC). 

Usually, the implementation of PBR in Australia relies on a 

‘breeder testing’ system in which the applicant, in 

conjunction with a nominated Qualified Person (QP), 

establishes, conducts and reports a comparative trial. More 

often than not, trials by several breeders are being 

conducted concurrently at different sites. This makes valid 

comparisons difficult and often results in costly duplication. 

While the current system is and will remain satisfactory, 

other optional testing methods are now available which will 

add flexibility to the PBR process. 

Centralised Testing is one such optional system. It is based 

upon the authorisation of private or public establishments to 

test one or more genera of plants. Applicants can choose to 

submit their varieties for testing by a CTC or continue to do 

the test themselves. Remember, using a CTC to test your 

variety is voluntary. 

The use of CTCs recognises the advantages of testing a 

larger number of candidate varieties (with a larger number 

of comparators) in a single comprehensive trial. Not only is 

there an increase in scientific rigour but there are substantial 

economies of scale and commensurate cost savings. A CTC 

will establish, conduct and report each trial on behalf of the 

applicant. 

The PBR office has amended its fees so that cost savings 

can be passed to applicants who choose to test their varieties 

in a CTC. Accordingly, when 5 or more candidate varieties 

of the same genus are tested simultaneously, each will 

qualify for the CTC examination fee of $800. This is a 

saving of nearly 40% over the normal fee of $1400. 

Trials containing less than 5 candidate varieties capable of 

being examined simultaneously will not be considered as 

Centralised test trials regardless of the authorisation of the 

facility. Candidate varieties in non-qualifying small trials 

will not qualify for CTC reduction of examination fees. 

114


Establishments wishing to be authorised as a CTC may 

apply in writing to the PBR office outlining their claims 

against the selection criteria. Initially, only one CTC will be 

authorised for each genus. Exemptions to this rule can be 

claimed due to special circumstances, industry needs and 

quarantine regulations. Authorisations will be reviewed 

periodically. 

Authorisation of CTCs is not aimed solely at large research 

institutions. Smaller establishments with appropriate 

facilities and experience, can also apply for CTC status. 

There is no cost for authorisation as a CTC. 

APPLICATIONS FOR AUTHORISATION AS A 

‘CENTRALISED TESTING CENTRE’ 

Establishments interested in gaining authorisation as a 

Centralised Testing Centre should apply in writing 

addressing each of the Conditions and Selection Criteria 

outlined below. 

Conditions and Selection Criteria 

To be authorised as a CTC, the following conditions and 

criteria will need to be met: 

Appropriate facilities 

While in part determined by the genera being tested, all 

establishments must have facilities that allow the conduct 

and completion of moderate to large scale scientific 

experiments without undue environmental influences. 

Again dependent on genera, a range of complementary 

testing and propagation facilities (e.g. outdoor, glasshouse, 

shadehouse, tissue culture stations) is desirable. 

Experienced staff 

Adequately trained staff, and access to appropriately 

accredited Qualified Persons, with a history of successful 

PVR/PBR applications will need to be available for all 

stages of the trial from planting to the presentation of the 

analysed data. These staff will require the authority to 

ensure timely maintenance of the trial. Where provided by 

the PBR office, the protocol and technical guidelines for the 

conduct of the trial must be followed. 

Substantial industry support 

Normally the establishment will be recognised by a state or 

national industry society or association. This may 

include/be replaced by a written commitment from major 

nurseries or other applicants, who have a history of 

regularly making applications for PBR in Australia, to use 

the facility. 

Capability for long term storage of genetic material 

Depending upon the genus, a CTC must be in a position to 

make a long term commitment to collect and maintain, at 

minimal cost, genetic resources of vegetatively propagated 

species as a source of comparative varieties. Applicants 

indicating a willingness to act as a national genetic resource 

centre in perpetuity will be favoured. 

Contract testing for 3rd Parties 

Unless exempted in writing by the PBR office operators of 

a CTC must be prepared to test varieties submitted by a 

third party. 

Relationship between CTC and 3rd Parties 

A formal arrangement between the CTC and any third party 

including fees for service will need to be prepared and 

signed before the commencement of the trial. It will include 

among other things: how the plant material will be delivered 

(e.g. date, stage of development plant, condition etc); allow 

the applicant and/or their agent and QP access to the site 

during normal working hours; and release the use of all trial 

data to the owners of the varieties included in the trial. 

One trial at a time 

Unless exempted in writing by the PBR office, all 

candidates and comparators should be tested in a single 

trial. 

One CTC per genus 

Normally only one CTC will be authorised to test a genus. 

Special circumstances may exist (environmental factors, 

quarantine etc) to allow more than one CTC per genus, 

though a special case will need to be made to the PBR 

office. More than one CTC maybe allowed for roses. 

One CTC may be authorised to test more than one genus. 

Authorisations for each genus will be reviewed periodically. 

Authorised Centralised Test Centres (CTCs) 

Following publication of applications for accreditation and ensuing public comment, the following organisations/individuals 

are authorised to act as CTCs. Any special conditions are also listed. 

Name Location Approved Facilities Name of QP Date of accreditation 

Genera 

Agriculture Victoria, Toolangi, VIC Potato Outdoor, field, R Kirkham 31/3/97 

National Potato greenhouse, tissue G Wilson 

Improvement Centre 

culture laboratory 

Bureau of Sugar Cairns, Tully, Saccharum Field, glasshouse, M Cox 30/6/97 

Experiment Stations Ingham, Ayr, tissue culture, 

Mackay, Bundaberg, 

pathology 

Brisbane QLD 

Ag-Seed Research Horsham and Canola Field, glasshouse, G Kadkol 30/6/97 

other sites 

shadehouse, laboratory 

and biochemical 

analyses 

Agriculture Western Northam WA Wheat Field, laboratory D Collins 30/6/97 


115


University of Sydney, Camden, NSW Argyranthemum, Outdoor, field, J Oates 30/6/97 

Plant Breeding Diascia, irrigation,greenhouses 

Institute Mandevilla, with controlled 

Oats 

micro-climates, 

controlled environment 

rooms, tissue culture, 

molecular genetics and 

cytology lab. 

Boulters Nurseries Monbulk, VIC Clematis Outdoor, shadehouse, M Lunghusen 30/9/97 

Monbulk Pty Ltd 

greenhouse 

Geranium Cottage Galston, NSW Pelargonium Field, controlled I Paananen 30/11/97 

Nursery 

environment house 

Agriculture Victoria Hamilton, VIC Perennial ryegrass, Field, shadehouse, V Gellert 30/6/98 

tall fescue, tall wheat glasshouse, growth M Anderson 

grass, white clover, 

persian clover 

chambers. Irrigation 

Pathology and tissue 

culture. Access to 

DNA and molecular 

marker technology. 

Cold storage. 

Koala Blooms Monbulk, VIC Bracteantha Outdoor, irrigation M Lunghusen 30/6/98 

Redlands Nursery Redland Bay, QLD Aglaonema Outdoor, shadehouse, K Bunker 30/6/98 

glasshouse and indoor 

facilities 

Protected Plant Macquarie Fields, New Guinea Glasshouse I Paananen 30/9/98 

Promotions NSW Impatiens including 

Impatiens hawkeri 

and its hybrids 

University of Lawes, QLD Some tropical Field, irrigation, D Hanger 30/9/98 

Queensland, pastures glasshouse, small 

Gatton College 

phytotron, plant 

nursery & 

propagation, tissue 

culture, seed and 

chemical lab, cool 

storage 

Jan and Peter Iredell Moggill, QLD Bougainvillea Outdoor, shadehouse J Iredell 30/9/98 

Protected Plant Macquarie Fields, Verbena Glasshouse I Paananen 31/12/98 

Promotions 

NSW 

Avondale Nurseries Glenorie, NSW Agapanthus Greenhouse, tissue I Paananen 31/12/98 

Ltd 

culture with 

commercial partnership 

Paradise Plants Kulnura, NSW Camellia, Field, glasshouse, J Robb 31/12/98 

Lavandula, shadehouse, 

Osmanthus, irrigation, tissue 

Ceratopetalum culture lab 

Prescott Roses Berwick, VIC Rosa Field, controlled C Prescott 31/12/98 

environment 

greenhouses 

F & I Baguley Clayton South, Euphorbia Controlled G Guy 31/3/99 

Flower and Plant VIC glasshouses, 

Growers 

quarantine facilities, 

tissue culture 

The following applications are pending: 

Name Location Genera applied for Facilities Name of QP 

Outeniqua Nursery Monbulk, VIC Unspecified Outdoor, glasshouse 

University of Queensland, Lawes, QLD Ornamental & Field, irrigation, L Bahnisch 

Gatton College bedding sp., glasshouse, small R Fletcher 

wheat, millet, phytotron, plant D George 

Prunus, Capsicum, nursery & M Johnston 

Glycine, Ipomea, Vigna, propagation, tissue G Lewis 

Lycopersicon, Asian culture, seed and G Porter 

vegetables, Tropical chemical lab, cool D Tay 

fruits, Solanum storage A Wearing 

D Hanger 

116


Comments (both for or against) either the continued 

accreditation of a CTC or applications to become a CTC are 

invited. Written comments are confidential and should be 

addressed to: 

The Registrar 

Plant Breeders Rights Office 

PO Box 858 

CANBERRA ACT 2601 

Fax (02) 6272 3650 

Closing date for comment: 31 March 2000. 

APPENDIX 7 

LIST OF CLASSES FOR VARIETY 

DENOMINATION PURPOSES 1 

As amended by the Council at its twenty-fifth ordinary 

session, on October 25, 1991. 

[Recommendation 9 

For the purposes of the fourth sentence of Article 13(2) 

of the Convention, all taxonomic units are considered 

closely related that belong to the same botanical genus or 

are contained in the same class in the list in Annex I to these 

Recommendations.] 

Note: Classes which contain subdivisions of a genus 

may lead to the existence of a complementary class 

containing the other subdivisions of the genus concerned 

(example: Class 9 (Vicia faba) leads to the existence of 

another class containing the other species of the genus 

Vicia). * 

Class 1: Avena, Hordeum, Secale, xTriticosecale, Triticum 

Class 2: Panicum, Setaria 

Class 3: Sorghum, Zea 

Class 4: Agrostis, Alopecurus, Arrhenatherum, Bromus, 

Cynosurus, Dactylis, Festuca,Lolium, Phalaris, Phleum, 

Poa, Trisetum 

Class 5: Brassica oleracea, Brassica chinensis, Brassica 

pekinensis 

Class 6: Brassica napus, B. campestris, B. rapa, B. juncea, 

B. nigra, Sinapis 

Class 7: Lotus, Medicago, Ornithopus, Onobrychis, 

Trifolium 

Class 8: Lupinus albus L., L. angustifolius L., L. luteus L. 

Class 9: Vicia faba L. 

Class 10: Beta vulgaris L. var. alba DC., Beta vulgaris L. 

var. altissima 

Class 11: Beta vulgaris ssp. vulgaris var. conditiva Alef. 

(syn.: Beta vulgaris L. var. rubra L.), Beta vulgaris L. var. 

cicla L., Beta vulgaris L. ssp. vulgaris var. vulgaris 

Class 12: Lactuca, Valerianella, Cichorium 

Class 13: Cucumis sativus 

Class 14: Citrullus, Cucumis melo, Cucurbita 

Class 15: Anthriscus, Petroselinum 

Class 16: Daucus, Pastinaca 

Class 17: Anethum, Carum, Foeniculum 

Class 18: Bromeliaceae 

Class 19: Picea, Abies, Pseudotsuga, Pinus, Larix 

Class 20: Calluna, Erica 

Class 21: Solanum tuberosum L. 

Class 22: Nicotiana rustica L., N. tabacum L. 

Class 23: Helianthus tuberosus 

Class 24: Helianthus annuus 

Class 25: Orchidaceae 

Class 26: Epiphyllum, Rhipsalidopsis, Schlumbergera, 

Zygocactus 

Class 27: Proteaceae 

COMPLEMENTARY CLASSES 

Class 28: Species of Brassica other than 

(in Class 5 + 6) Brassica oleracea, Brassica chinensis, 

Brassica pekinensis + Brassica napus, B. campestris, B. 

rapa, B. juncea, B. nigra, Sinapis 

Class 29: Species of Lupinus other than 

(in Class 8) Lupinus albus L., L. angustifolius L., L. luteus 

L. 

Class 30: Species of Vicia other than 

(in Class 9) Vicia faba L. 

Class 31: Species of Beta + subdivisions of the species Beta 

vulgaris other than 

(in Class 10 +11) Beta vulgaris L. var. alba DC., Beta 

vulgaris L. var. altissima + Beta vulgaris ssp. vulgaris var. 

conditiva Alef. (syn.: Beta vulgaris L. var. rubra L.), Beta 

vulgaris L. var. cicla L., Beta vulgaris L. ssp. vulgaris var. 

vulgaris 

Class 32: Species of Cucumis other than 

(in Class 13 + 14) Cucumis sativus + Citrullus, Cucumis 

melo, Cucurbita 

Class 33: Species of Solanum other than 

(in Class 21) Solanum tuberosum L. 

Class 34: Species of Nicotiana other than 

(in Class 22) Nicotiana rustica L., N. tabacum L. 

117


Class 35: Species of Helianthus other than 

(in Class 23 + 24) Helianthus tuberosus + Helianthus 

annuus. 

* The complementary classes have been added by the Office of the 

Union for the convenience of the reader and are given the numbers 28 

to 35. 

1 From UPOV RECOMMENDATIONS ON VARIETY 

DENOMINATIONS, Adopted by The Council of UPOV on October 16, 

1987, and amended on October 25, 1991 

APPENDIX 8 

REGISTER OF PLANT VARIETIES 

Register of Plant Varieties contains the legal description of 

the varieties granted Plant Breeder’s Rights. Under section 

62(1) of the Plant Breeder’s Rights Act 1994 a person may 

inspect the Register at any reasonable time. Following are 

the contact details for registers kept in each state and 

territories. 

South Australia 

Ms Lisa Halskov 

AQIS 

8 Butler Street 

PORT ADELAIDE SA 5000 

Phone 08 8305 9706 

Western Australia 

Mr Geoffrey Wood 

AQIS 

Level, Wing C 

Market City 

280 Bannister Road 

CANNING VALE WA 6154 

Phone 08 9311 5407 

New South Wales 

Mr. Alex Jabs 

General Services 

AQIS 

2 Hayes Road 

ROSEBERY NSW 2018 

Phone 02 9364 7293 

Victoria and Tasmania 

Mr. Colin Hall 

AQIS 

Building D, 2nd Floor 

World Trade Centre 

Flinders Street 

MELBOURNE VIC 3005 

Phone 03 9246 6810 

Queensland 

Mr. Ian Haseler 

AQIS 

2nd Floor 

433 Boundary Street 

SPRING HILL QLD 4000 

Phone 07 3246 8755 

Australian Capital Territory and Northern Territory 

ACT and NT Registers are kept in the Library of PBR 

Office in Canberra 

Phone 02 6272 4228 

118

VOLUNTARY CEREAL REGISTRATION 


Register of Australian 

Winter CerealCultivars 

Varietal Descriptions from the Voluntary 

Scheme for the Registration of Cereal 

Cultivars 

Some procedural changes have been implemented in the 

operations of the Voluntary Cereal Registration Scheme. 

The Plant Breeder’s Rights (PBR) office and the Voluntary 

Cereal Registration Scheme are collaborating to ensure that 

descriptions of new varieties, whether they are protected by 

PBR or not, are made available. 

The Plant Varieties Journal now includes descriptions of 

cultivars registered under the Voluntary Cereal Registration 

Scheme. Please note that publishing a description in the 

Plant Varieties Journal does not automatically qualify a 

cultivar to be protected under Plant Breeder’s Rights 

(PBR). PBR is entirely a different scheme and there are 

specific requirements under the Plant Breeder’s Rights 

Act 1994 which must be satisfied to be eligible for 

registration under PBR. However, it is possible that some 

cultivars published in this section of the journal are also 

registered under PBR. When a cultivar is registered under 

both schemes, the current PBR status of the cultivar is 

indicated in the descriptions. 

A Check list for Registering New Cereal Cultivars in 

the Voluntary Scheme 

Breeders considering submitting a new variety to the 

voluntary scheme should: 

that seed samples of registered cultivars can be freely 

distributed by the AWCC to bona fide scientists for 

research purposes. 

4. Provide a description of the new cultivar for 

publication in the Plant Varieties Journal and send it to the 

Voluntary Cereal Registration Scheme in Word for 

Windows or in RTF format – either by an e-mail 

attachment or by ordinary mail on a 3.5 inch a IBM 

formatted floppy diskette. In general, a description should 

contain the following headings: 

• Common name 

• Botanical name 

• Cultivar name 

• Registration number 

• Registration date 

• Name and address of Originators 

• Name and address of Registrar of Cereal Cultivars 

• Released by 

• Synonyms (if any) 

• Parentage 

• Breeding and selection 

• Morphology 

• Disease Reaction 

• Yield 

• Quality 

• PBR Status (if any) 

• Acknowledgment (if any) 

• Breeder 

1. Clear the proposed name with Australian Winter Cereal 

Collection (AWCC). The AWCC will query available 

information systems to ensure that the proposed name will 

not be confused with other cultivars of the same group and 

issue a registration number. The timeframe for this 

process will usually be less than 24 hours, and can be done 

by phone, fax or by e-mail. 

2. Complete a registration form, including the registration 

number and forward the form to the Voluntary Cereal 

Registration Scheme – either by an e-mail attachment or by 

ordinary mail on a 3.5 inch a IBM formatted floppy 

diskette. The breeders will be notified of the acceptance for 

a new registration within one week of its receipt. 

3. Send an untreated one kilogram (1 kg) reference (or 

type) sample of seed to the Voluntary Cereal Registration 

Scheme for long term storage in the AWCC. Please 

indicate if there are any restrictions on the distribution of 

this seed. Unless advised to the contrary it will be assumed 

In addition, you may also include other headings if they are 

relevant to the description of the variety. Please follow the 

general style and format of the descriptions published in 

the current issue. Please note: always format your 

description in a single column, do not format in two 

columns. Columns will be formatted during the 

publication process. 

The Voluntary Cereal Registration Scheme will 

electronically forward your description to the Plant 

Varieties Journal for publication. Plant Varieties Journal 

reserves the right for editorial corrections and the edited 

versions will be forwarded to the breeder for review before 

the final publication. Publication cost will be charged on a 

cost recovery basis with invoices sent directly from the 

PBR office to the breeder. The nominal cost will be 

$400.00 (four hundred dollars) per variety. 

There is no descriptions from the Voluntary Cereal 

Registration Scheme included in this issue. 

119


Contact information 

Registration 

Publication 

Voluntary Cereal Registration Scheme 

Registrar PBR 

C/- Australian Winter Cereals Collection 


RMB 944, Calala Lane GPO Box 858 

TAMWORTH NSW 2340 CANBERRA ACT 2601 

Phone: (02) 6763 1149 Phone: (02) 6272 4228 

Fax: (02) 6763 1154 Fax: (02) 6272 3650 

e-mail: mackaym@agric.nsw.gov.au 

e-mail: Doug.Waterhouse@affa.gov.au 

120

CUMULATIVE INDEX 



Cumulative Index for PVJ Volumes 1(1) - 

12(4) 

Legend: PVJ Vol (No) page number 

Index of articles 

10 years of Plant Breeders Rights in Australia 10(4) 4 

Acceptance/rejection of application 1(1) 6 

1(3) 2 

Accreditation for ‘qualified persons’ 5(1) 4 

5(2) 4 

5(3) 4 

Advertising in Plant Varieties Journal 4(1) 2 

Amendments to Proposed Schedule for 

Implementation 1(2) 2 

1(3) 2 

1(4) 2 

2(1) 2 

2(3) 2 

Amendments to the PBR Act 

‘Freeing up the use of Variety Names’ 12(1) 5 

12(2) 5 


‘Temporary amnesty for applicants caught in 

the change from 6 to 4 years of prior sale’ 12(4) 5 

‘Other amendments’ 12(4) 5 

Instructions to Authors: New Format For Preparing 

Varietal Description 11(3) 2 

Amendments to the Plant Variety Rights Act 1987 4(1) 2 

5(2) 3 

Application for review 1(1) 11 

Applications for US Plant Patents by Australian 

Breeders 6(2) 3 

Application forms 1(1) 6 

3(1) 3 

3(2) 4 

4(2) 3 

Applications to be certified by an accredited 

qualified person 5(4) 3 

Applying for Plant Breeders Rights 8(3) 2 

Availability of PVR overseas for Australian 

breeders 2(4) 4 

Availability of protected varieties 1(4) 3 

Byrne Report - Public comment 4(3) 5 

Centralised testing for Australian species 4(4)3 

Centralised testing of varieties 5(2) 4 

Centralised Testing Centres 10(1) 63 

10(2) 72 

10(3) 73 

10(4) 77 

11(1) 78 

11(2) 68 

11(3) 67 

Centralised Testing Centre for Roses 11(1) 2 

Certification of results 1(1) 8 

Changes to application procedures 6(1) 3 

Chemical characters as distinguishing criteria 4(3) 3 

Comparative growing trials 2(2) 2 

Comparative growing trials - fruit varieties 2(2) 2 

Comparative growing trials - overseas test results 2(2) 2 

Compulsory licences 1(1) 5 

Computer disks - What is the required format 7(4) 4 

Cooperative testing arrangements with Netherlands 3(4) 2 

Copies of applications 3(3) 4 

Criteria for the grant of rights 1(1) 3 

Cumulative index to PVJ 3(4) 2 

Definition of variety 2(3) 2 

Deriving new from existing varieties 4(4) 3 

Description of closest known varieties 1(1) 8 

Descriptions of Varieties: The Short Version 8(1) 2 

Descriptions 5(1) 5 

5(2) 4 

6(4) 3 

Descriptions from Voluntary Cereal Registration 11(2) 9 

Distinctness 1(2) 4 

DUS Criteria 1(1) 6 

Eligible genera and species 1(1) 3 

Eligibility and examination of applications 2(4) 2 

Equivalent test growing 1(3) 3 

Examination fees 3(3) 2 

Examination of applications 1(1) 9 

Examination options 2(4) 3 

Extension of protection to further genera and species 

in Belgium, Denmark, Ireland and South Africa 7(3) 3 

Fees 1(1) 11 

2(2) 3 

3(2) 4 

3(4) 3 

8(4) 52 

Freeing up the use of Variety Names 12(1) 5 

Granting of PVR on basis of overseas test reports 5(3) 3 

Granting of rights 1(1) 9 

History of development of Gene Technology 

Regulation in Australia 11(2) 2 

Horticultural Research & Development Corporation 1(3) 4 

How can I propose a name or synonym for my 

new plant variety? 9(2) 70 

How to apply 1(2) 3 

How to calculate Least Significant Difference 

(LSD) 9(2) 71 

Implementation of PVR - progress 1(2) 2 

1(3) 2 

1(4) 2 

2(1) 2 

2(2) 2 

2(3) 2 

2(4) 2 

3(1) 2 

3(2) 2 

Infringement of rights 1(1) 11 

Inspection of applications and objections 1(1) 9 

Instructions to Authors 8(3) 2 

11(3) 2 

International exhibition of Plant Biotechnology 3(4) 2 

Introduction of Australian bred plants into 

overseas markets 6(2) 3 

Labelling a protected variety 4(4) 4 

Labelling of varieties under provisional 

protection 4(1) 2 

Legal Issues Associated with PBR 10(1) 3 

10(2) 3 

Licensing arrangements between breeder and agent 4(3) 3 

Market evaluation under provisional protection 3(2) 2 



Molecular techniques and PVR 5(2) 3 

Names of varieties 6(1) 3 

New Identity for Patent Office 11(1) 2 

New payment deadlines for PVR examination fee 5(1) 3 

New Publication Dates for PVJ 9(1) 2 

Non-infringement notice 1(1) 11 

Note for overseas breeders 4(3) 4 

Note to Australian agents for applicants 4(2) 3 

Note to rose applicants 4(2) 2 

Objections (formal) 8(1) 2 

Objections 8(2) 2 

Objection to applications 1(1) 9 

Objections to the granting of rights 4(3) 3 

Obligations and exemptions 1(1) 11 

Obtaining United States Plant Patent 

Origins of new varieties 3(3) 3 

Overseas Test Reports 9(2) 2 

11(3) 6 

Overseas Testing/Data 12(4) 

Protection Based on Your Australian 

PBR Application PBR/Grant 10(3) 4 

Possible Changes Relating to the 4yr/6yr prior 

sale provisions 11(3) 5 

Participation by industry organisations 2(1) 3 

Penalties 1(1) 8 

Performance Evaluation 1(4) 3 

2(1) 2 

Photographs 5(1) 5 

Plant Breeders Rights Act 1994 - What are the 

changes 7(4) 2 

Plant Breeders Rights Advisory Committee 8(4) 53 

9(1) 39 

9(2) 65 

9(3) 76 

9(4) 61 

10(1) 53 

10(2) 62 

10(3) 62 

10(4) 68 

11(1) 68 

11(2) 59 

11(3) 56 

11(4) 58 




- Summary of Minutes of PBRAC 

Meeting held on 1st May 1996 9(3) 76 

Meeting held on 5th February 1997 10(1) 54 

Meeting held on 6th August 1997 10(3) 60 

Meeting held on 11th March 1998 11(1) 68 

Meeting held on 16th September 1998 11(3) 56 

Meeting held on 10 and 11 March 1999 12(3) 60 

Plant Breeder’s Rights in Acted in Republic of 

Korea 11(2) 7 

Plant Varieties Journal 1(1) 4 

Plant Variety Protection in the United States 

of America 7(1) 3 

Plant Variety Rights Act 1(1) 3 

Plant Variety Rights Advisory Committee 5(1) 3 

Protecting the First Variety of a Species 7(2) 3 

PVR and patents - expert study 3(3) 2 

PVR DUS testing under quarantine conditions 3(2) 2 

PVR in Canada 4(2) 2 

PVR in other countries 3(4) 2 

PVR logo 1(4) 4 

PVR on hybrid lines and inbred parents 3(2) 3 

PVR registered names and trade marks 3(2) 2 

PVR trials - register of names 1(4) 4 

2(1) 2 

2(2) 3 

2(3) 3 

2(4) 4 

3(1) 2 

3(2) 4 

Propagation 1(4) 2 

2(1) 2 

2(2) 2 

3(1) 2 

Propagation for non-commercial purposes 1(2) 3 

1(3) 2 

Provisional Protection 1(1) 4 

2(2) 2 

2(3) 2 

2(4) 3 

3(1) 2 

9(3) 5 

10(2) 5 

Public Notice of Application 1(1) 9 

Qualified persons and comparative trials 4(1) 3 

Register of Plant Variety Rights 1(1) 10 

11(2) 55 

Requirement to Supply Comparative Varieties 8(3) 2 

Requirements and Procedures for making 

Applications based on Test Reports from Overseas 6(3) 3 

Revocation of rights 1(1) 10 

Royal Horticultural Society (RHS) Colour Charts 7(1) 3 

Rose trial ground 2(4) 3 

Rose workshop 4(4) 3 

Rother and Kientzler’s 50th 5(2) 3 

Royalty collection agency 5(2) 4 

Ryegrass - co-operative examination with 

New Zealand 3(1) 2 

Sale of varieties before PVR grant 3(3) 2 

Selection and characterisation 3(1) 2 

Stability 1(2) 6 

Staff 1(2) 6 

2(4) 2 

3(1) 3 

3(2) 4 

3(3) 4 

4(1) 2 

4(3) 5 

5(4) 3 

Strawberries 5(3) 4 

Strong demand from breeders for molecular 

techniques 5(3) 3 

Supply of reproductive material 1(1) 10 

Test growing 1(1) 8 

Trade Marks and varietal names 5(2) 4 

Transfer of rights 1(1) 10 

Uniformity 1(2) 4 

UPOV 1(1) 5 

1(4) 4 

2(1) 2 




2(2) 3 

2(3) 3 

2(4) 4 

3(3) 4 

UPOV - proposed revisions to convention 3(4) 3 

UPOV Developments 9(4) 2 

10(1) 2 

10(2) 2 

10(3) 2 

10(4) 2 

11(1) 2 

11(2) 7 

11(3) 2 

11(4) 2 





UPOV-ROM Plant Variety Database 11(2) 71 

Use and standardisation of the PVR logo 5(1) 3 

Use of overseas trial data for PVR 3(3) 3 

Valid application - revised minimum requirements 4(4) 4 

Variation of application 1(1) 8 

Varieties for comparison 3(2) 3 

Varieties originated in another country 1(1) 8 

Variety identification-laboratory techniques 1(4) 3 

Variety names 1(4) 3 

4(2) 2 

Visit to PVR Office by consultant from Japan 3(4) 2 

Warning: labelling of plants 5(4) 3 

What is PVR? 1(1) 3 

1(2) 2 

Who can apply 1(1) 6 

Why have PVR? 1(2) 2 

Withdrawal of application 1(1) 9 

Withdrawn applications - PVR protection lapses 7(3) 3 

Workshops for qualified persons 3(4) 2 

6(4) 3 

Workshop on intellectual property protection 

for plants 2(3) 3 

Workshop on laboratory identification of plant 

varieties 3(3) 2 

Workshops on PVR applications and trials 3(2) 3 

Index of varieties 

Numbers in each column refer to the volume, issue and page number of the Plant Varieties Journal in which the variety 

appears. For example 8(3) 4 refers to Plant Varieties Journal volume 8 issue 3 page 4. Where no public notice is indicated, 

either the description is the first public notice of acceptance of that variety, a name change has occurred, or the application 

was withdrawn prior to acceptance. A † symbol following the variety name indicates that the name of the variety has changed 

and reference to the change appears in the ‘Varied’ column. 

Public Description Grant Varied Withdrawn/ Corrigenda 

Notice 

Surrendered/ 

Revoked/ 

Refused 

Abelia 

xgrandiflora 

‘Short & Sweet’ 12(3) 9 

Abutilon 

xhybridum 

‘Golden Bell’ 8(3) 4 9(1) 11 9(4) 55 

Acacia 

boormanii 

‘Olympic Gold’ 6(4) 8 9(3) 66 10(4) 63 10(3) 56 

cardiophylla 

‘Gold Lace’ 2(2) 31 2(2) 26 3(1) 4 3(1) 37 

‘Kuranga Gold Lace’† 

cognata 

3(1) 37 

‘Green Mist’ 5(2) 35 6(4) 19 7(4) 39 

‘UY2’ 12(4) 13 

‘UY3’ 12(4) 13 

leprosa 

‘RBGM801’ 11(3) 10 

terminalis 

‘Tasmanian Pink’ 3(4) 38 10(1) 50 

Acalypha 

hybrid 

‘Pink Candles’ 2(4) 39 2(4) 23 3(3) 5 

Acer 

palmatum 

‘Crimson Prince’ 3(3) 26 6(1) 31 

rubrum 

‘Fairview Flame’ 9(4) 10 




Notice 

Surrendered/ 

Revoked/ 

Refused 

truncatum x platanoides 

‘Keithsform’ syn 

Norwegian Sunset 6(2) 33 10(1) 21 10(4) 62 11(1) 65 

‘Warrenred’ syn 

Pacific Sunset 6(2) 33 10(1) 21 10(4) 62 11(1) 65 

Acmena 

smithii 

‘Hot Flush’ 11(2) 14 11(3) 23 12(3) 57 

‘Bullock Creek’† 

‘Hedgemaster’ 7(1) 7 9(2) 28 10(2) 56 


Actinidia 

chinensis 

‘Hort16A’ 11(3) 11 

deliciosa 

‘Tomua’ 11(3) 11 12(4) 43 

Actinotus 

helianthi 

‘Starbright’ 10(2) 11 12(4) 41 

‘Federation Star’ 12(4) 102 

Aeschynomene 

americana 

‘Lee’ 5(4) 33 8(1) 8 8(4) 49 

villosa 

‘Kretschmer’ 9(3) 12 

‘Reid’ 9(3) 12 

Agapanthus 

hybrid 

‘Fragrant Blue’ 12(3) 9 

orientalis 

‘Black Panther’† 

‘Black Pantha’ 11(3) 9 12(1) 14 12(4) 98 



‘Fragrant Snow’ 11(3) 9 

‘Glen Avon’ syn 

Fragrant Glen 11(3) 9 

‘Lavender Haze’ 12(3) 9 

‘Regal Beauty’ 12(3) 9 

praecox x orientalis 

‘Silver Sword’ 12(3) 9 

‘Snow Storm’† 

‘Snowstorm’ 2(1) 15 11(1) 10 

11(2) 55 

11(2) 55 

11(3) 54 


‘Variegated Wilken’ 12(4) 10 

Aglaonema 

commutatum 

‘Jubilee Green’ 10(1) 8 10(2) 16 11(1) 62 

‘Rembrandt’ 10(1) 8 10(2) 16 11(1) 62 

costatum var. foxii 

‘Northern Lightning’ 7(1) 5 9(4) 11 10(3) 52 

hybrid 

‘Amelia’ 12(2) 10 

‘Brilliant Beauty’ 11(2) 12 12(3) 13 

‘Compact Maria’ 10(2) 10 10(4) 16 11(3) 51 

‘Green Majesty’ 12(2) 10 

‘Grey Dawn’ 11(2) 12 12(3) 14 

‘Lisa Joy’ 11(2) 12 12(3) 15 

‘Mary Ann’ 12(2) 10 

‘Painted Princess’ 12(2) 10 

‘Pride Of Sumatra’ 8(4) 5 10(2) 18 11(1) 62 





Notice 

Surrendered/ 

Revoked/ 

Refused 

‘Royal Ripple’ 12(2) 10 

‘Silver Rain’ 11(2) 12 12(3) 16 

‘Silver Queen Compact’ syn 

Silver Lady 10(2) 10 10(4) 16 12(1) 69 11(2) 56 

nitidum 

‘Rhapsody in Green’ 12(1) 10 12(3) 15 

‘Queen Of Siam’ syn 

April In Paris 9(3) 9 10(2) 16 11(1) 62 9(3) 73 

Agonis 

flexuosa 

‘Forest Magic’ 10(3) 10 11(4) 37 

‘Jervis Bay Afterdark’ 10(4) 13 11(1) 54 11(4) 52 

‘Peppermint Cream’ 6(1) 28 6(4) 54 7(2) 29 

‘Pink Flush’† 

‘Royal Flush’ 5(4) 34 

6(4) 54 

7(3) 49 

‘Southern Wonder’ 9(2) 5 10(2) 21 11(2) 55 

flexuosa nana 

‘Pink Peppy’ 10(4) 13 12(1) 73 

Allium 

cepa 

‘Lucy’s Mild Brown’ 12(3) 11 

‘Orbex’ syn UW 160 5(1) 25 7(3) 49 

Allocasuarina 

littoralis 

‘Matuka Silver’ 8(4) 5 12(1) 26 12(4) 101 9(1) 37 

Alnus 

jorullensis 

‘Royal Cascade’ syn 

Weeping Willy 4(4) 23 5(4) 14 7(1) 32 5(3) 21 6(1) 32 

Alstroemeria 

aurea 

‘583 JA’ 9(3) 9 9(4) 12 10(3) 52 

‘Aruba’ 8(3) 4 8(3) 8 9(2) 60 10(1) 50 

‘Felicity’ 7(1) 5 7(4) 22 8(3) 51 11(3) 54 

‘Java’ 8(3) 4 8(3) 9 9(2) 60 

‘Yellow Luna’ 8(4) 5 9(4) 13 10(3) 52 

hybrid 

‘587B’ 9(1) 4 9(4) 12 10(3) 52 

‘Alaska’ 7(2) 5 7(4) 19 8(3) 51 12(3) 57 

‘Amazon’ syn Inca Spice 11(3) 9 12(2) 18 12(2) 70 

‘Andes’ 7(1) 6 8(1) 6 8(4) 48 

‘Atlanta’ 7(2) 5 7(4) 19 8(3) 51 12(3) 57 

‘Ballet’ 10(2) 10 11(2) 16 12(4) 98 12(1) 72 


‘Carise Miami’† 

‘Cavalier’ 4(3) 26 7(2) 13 9(3) 70 


11(4) 55 

‘Cobra’ 7(1) 7 8(1) 7 8(4) 48 

‘Delta’ syn Inca Salsa 11(3) 9 12(2) 17 12(2) 70 

‘Diana’ 7(4) 6 9(4) 13 10(4) 61 12(1) 73 

‘Evita’ 8(3) 4 10(2) 18 11(2) 52 12(3) 57 

‘First Love’ 8(2) 2 10(3) 12 11(2) 52 

‘Flamengo’ 5(4) 34 7(4) 16 8(3) 51 12(3) 57 

‘Gloria’ 7(2) 4 7(4) 18 8(3) 51 10(3) 56 

‘Golden Delight’ 4(3) 26 7(2) 13 9(3) 70 11(4) 55 

‘Iberia’ 7(2) 4 7(4) 18 8(3) 51 10(3) 56 

‘Ibiza’ 9(1) 4 9(3) 13 10(2) 55 

‘Inca Blaze’ 12(2) 10 

‘Inca Charm’ 11(3) 9 

‘Inca Delight’ 11(3) 9 




Notice 

Surrendered/ 

Revoked/ 

Refused 

‘Inca Gold’ 12(2) 10 

‘Inca Moonlight’ 12(2) 10 

‘Inca Salsa’ syn Delta† 

‘Inca Spice’ syn 


Yellow Amazon† 

‘Inca Sunset’ 12(2) 10 


‘Konona 90-2-2’ 11(3) 9 

‘La Paz’ 2(4) 39 3(2) 13 4(2) 4 

‘Little Moon’ 10(4) 15 12(1) 15 12(4) 98 12(2) 71 

‘Little Star’ 8(3) 4 10(2) 19 11(2) 52 12(3) 57 

‘Little Sun’ 8(3) 4 10(2) 19 11(2) 52 12(3) 57 

‘Miami’ syn Carise Miami 11(3) 9 12(2) 12 12(1) 73 


‘Minerva’ 7(1) 6 8(1) 8 8(4) 49 

‘My Virginia’† 

‘Nevada’ 5(4) 34 7(4) 17 8(3) 51 



‘Orange Delight’ 4(3) 26 7(2) 13 9(3) 70 12(3) 57 11(4) 56 

‘Our Ballet’† 

‘Paloma’ 2(4) 39 3(2) 13 4(2) 4 


‘Fantasy’ 11(3) 9 

‘Pink Roma’† 

‘Roma’ syn Pink Roma 11(3) 9 12(2) 19 



‘Sangria’ 2(4) 39 

‘Savannah 12(4) 10 

4(3) 26 5(2) 10 7(1) 32 

‘Serena’ 2(4) 39 3(3) 7 4(3) 6 

‘Soleil’ 11(3) 10 12(2) 70 

‘Stabec’ syn Rebecca 7(3) 5 9(1) 8 9(4) 55 11(3) 54 

‘Stabecor’ 

syn Sunny Rebecca 12(3) 9 

‘Stabelin’ syn Belinda 10(4) 10 12(1) 15 12(4) 98 11(3) 54 


‘Stabelin’ syn Madeline† 

‘Stabelstri’ syn Fabiola 3(2) 34 3(4) 12 


7(2) 29 

‘Stabuwit’ syn Amanda 3(2) 34 3(4) 11 7(4) 39 

‘Stadutia’ syn Tiara 3(2) 34 3(4) 9 4(4) 4 

‘Stajugro’ syn Barbara 3(2) 34 3(4) 14 6(1) 7 

‘Stajured’ syn Claudia 4(1) 25 5(1) 26 

‘Stakrist’ syn Kristina 10(2) 10 10(4) 17 11(3) 51 11(3) 54 

‘Stalan’ syn Annabel 3(2) 34 3(4) 6 4(4) 4 6(1) 7 

‘Stalauli’ syn Raffaela† 11(3) 54 


‘Stalauli’ syn Laura 10(4) 10 12(4) 15 12(4) 102 

‘Stalbel’ syn Libelle 3(2) 34 3(4) 12 4(4) 5 

‘Stalibla’ syn White 

Libelle 3(2) 34 3(4) 13 6(1) 7 12(4) 102 

‘Stalibron’ syn 

Butterscotch 3(2) 34 3(4) 9 4(4) 4 6(1) 7 

‘Stalilas’ syn Jubilee 3(2) 34 3(4) 14 6(1) 7 12(4) 102 

‘Stalog’ syn Olga 12(3) 9 

‘Stalona’ syn Ilona 10(2) 10 10(4) 17 11(3) 51 11(3) 54 

‘Staloren’ syn Lorena 12(3) 10 

‘Stalove’ syn Amor 6(3) 44 9(1) 9 9(4) 55 11(3) 54 

‘Stalra’ syn Tamara 12(3) 10 

‘Stalsam’ syn Samora 3(2) 34 3(4) 10 4(4) 4 

‘Stalsunny’ syn 

Sunny Rebecca 12(2) 71 

‘Stalvir’ syn Carola 3(2) 34 3(4) 7 4(4) 4 12(4) 102 

‘Stamial’ syn Pink 

Minetti 10(4) 10 11(3) 54 

‘Stamond’ 8(4) 5 9(3) 13 10(2) 55 11(3) 54 

‘Stanata’ syn Natasja 10(4) 10 12(3) 17 11(3) 54 

‘Staprilan’ syn Angela 10(4) 10 11(3) 54 

‘Staprimar’ syn Margaret 12(2) 10 

‘Staprimil’ syn Emily 10(4) 10 12(1) 17 12(4) 98 11(3) 54 





Notice 

Surrendered/ 

Revoked/ 

Refused 

‘Staprimon’ syn Monica 10(4) 10 12(1) 17 12(4) 98 11(3) 54 

‘Staprinag’ syn Ragna 10(4) 10 12(1) 18 12(4) 98 11(3) 54 

‘Stapripal’ syn Paola 12(2) 10 

‘Stapripur’ syn Mira 4(1) 25 9(1) 9 9(4) 55 11(3) 54 

‘Staprisis’ syn Sissi 10(4) 10 12(1) 19 12(4) 98 11(3) 54 

‘Stapristef’ syn Stephanie 12(2) 10 

‘Staprizsa’ syn Zsa Zsa 10(4) 10 12(1) 20 12(4) 98 11(3) 54 

‘Stapula’ 8(4) 5 10(2) 19 11(1) 62 11(3) 54 

‘Stapurzul’ syn Azula 3(2) 34 3(4) 15 7(4) 39 12(4) 102 

‘Staranlo’ syn Vera 4(1) 25 5(1) 26 

‘Starexan’ syn Xandra 10(4) 10 12(4) 16 

‘Staronic’ syn Veronica 3(2) 34 3(4) 7 7(4) 39 11(3) 54 12(4) 102 

‘Starover’ syn Olivia 3(2) 34 3(4) 8 4(4) 5 12(4) 102 

‘Stasabi’ syn Sabina 10(4) 10 12(3) 17 11(3) 54 

‘Stasach’ syn Sacha 8(4) 5 9(3) 14 10(2) 55 11(3) 54 

‘Stasilva’ syn Silvia 4(1) 25 5(1) 26 

‘Staterpa’ syn Marita 4(1) 25 6(2) 35 

‘Statiren’ syn Irena 8(4) 5 9(3) 15 10(2) 55 11(3) 54 

‘Staverpi’ syn Fiona 3(2) 34 3(4) 8 6(1) 7 

‘Stayeli’ syn 

Yellow Libelle 3(2) 34 3(4) 10 7(4) 39 12(4) 102 

‘Stayelor’ syn Helios 3(2) 34 3(4) 11 7(4) 39 

‘Sydney’ 6(2) 33 7(1) 28 8(1) 38 

‘Testapink’ syn 

Pink Sapphire† 11(3) 54 


‘Testapink’ syn 

Pink Diamond 10(4) 10 12(4) 17 12(4) 102 

‘Toscana’ 7(2) 5 7(4) 19 8(3) 51 12(3) 57 

‘Victoria’ 5(4) 34 7(4) 17 8(3) 51 12(3) 57 

‘Vienna’ 9(1) 4 9(3) 15 10(2) 55 

‘Virginia’ 10(2) 10 11(2) 16 12(4) 99 12(1) 72 


‘Wilhelmina’ 2(4) 39 3(3) 6 4(3) 6 

‘Zanta’ syn Violetta 7(4) 6 10(2) 20 11(2) 52 12(3) 57 

‘Zelblanca’ syn Bianca 3(2) 32 3(4) 13 7(2) 29 

‘Zelpado’ syn Jupiter 3(2) 34 3(4) 15 7(2) 29 

‘Zelrosa’ syn Pink Jewel 3(2) 34 3(4) 16 6(1) 7 

Angophora 

costata 

‘Little Gumball’ 9(4) 10 11(1) 44 10(2) 59 

‘Spit Fire’† 10(2) 59 

Anigozanthos 

bicolor x humilis 

‘Masquerade’ 3(4) 38 3(4) 27 7(3) 49 

hybrid 

‘Bush Ember’ 7(2) 6 8(3) 15 9(2) 61 

‘Bush Garnet’ 10(2) 12 12(1) 32 

‘Bush Heritage’ 7(2) 6 8(3) 16 9(2) 61 

‘Bush Ochre’ 7(2) 6 8(3) 17 9(2) 61 

‘Bush Pearl’ 10(2) 12 12(4) 

‘Bush Splendour’ 7(2) 6 8(3) 18 9(2) 61 

‘Bush Sunshine’ 7(2) 6 8(3) 53 

‘Bush Twilight’ 7(2) 6 8(3) 19 9(2) 61 

‘Firefly’ 1(4) 23 1(4) 10 2(4) 5 7(3) 49 

‘Joey Confetti’ 

1385(C), H31 7(3) 8 7(3) 44 9(3) 71 10(4) 65 

‘Joey Fireworks’ syn 

1377(A), H30 7(3) 8 7(3) 45 11(1) 63 

‘Joey Lipstick’ 8(4) 6 9(3) 31 10(2) 56 

‘Joey Rouge’ syn 

1599(A) 7(3) 8 

‘Lemon Whizz’ 3(4) 38 4(3) 18 5(3) 5 4(1) 25 7(3) 49 




Notice 

Surrendered/ 

Revoked/ 

Refused 

‘Milky Way’† 

pulcherrimus x rufus 

4(1) 25 

‘Sunglow’ 6(4) 8 9(2) 26 

rufus 

‘Kings Park 

Federation Flame’ 10(2) 12 11(4) 26 12(3) 55 

viridis 

‘Green Dragon’ 10(4) 12 11(3) 22 12(2) 68 

viridis x manglesii 

‘Uluru Sunset’ 3(4) 38 3(4) 28 7(3) 49 

Anopterus 

glandulosus 

‘Picton River Pink’ syn 

Southern Pink 8(1) 6 10(3) 56 

Anthurium 

andraeanum 

‘Champion’ 8(4) 6 10(1) 12 10(4) 61 9(4) 57 

10(4) 64 

hybrid 

‘Ruth Morat’ syn 

Lady Ruth 7(3) 6 9(3) 17 10(2) 55 

scherzerianum 

‘Arabella’ syn Arndt’s 

Flamenco Arabella 4(1) 25 4(1) 14 4(4) 5 

Apium 

prostratum 

‘Southern Ocean’ 9(2) 9 

Arachis 

hypogaea 

‘Conder’ 12(1) 12 12(2) 38 

‘Roberts’ 12(1) 12 12(2) 38 

‘Shosh’ 8(1) 5 10(1) 29 10(4) 62 

pintoi 

‘Amarillo’ 2(4) 39 2(4) 28 3(3) 6 

Arenaria 

montana 

‘White Pearls’ 7(2) 7 8(4) 48 9(3) 73 11(4) 55 

Argyranthemum 

frutescens 

‘Abby Belle’ 10(3) 10 11(2) 29 12(1) 70 

‘Amy Belle’ 10(3) 10 11(2) 29 

‘Annie Petite’ 10(1) 10 11(2) 29 12(1) 70 10(1) 51 

‘Beth’ 9(4) 9 11(2) 29 12(1) 70 10(1) 51 

‘Carmella’ 9(2) 7 9(2) 28 10(1) 48 

‘Christy Belle’ 10(3) 10 11(2) 30 12(1) 70 

‘Cream Butterfly’syn 

Cream Star 5(3) 15 5(3) 15 6(2) 5 10(4) 65 11(2) 56 

‘Elly Belle’ 10(3) 10 11(2) 31 12(1) 70 

‘Gretel’ 8(1) 3 9(2) 30 10(1) 48 

‘Holly Belle’ 10(3) 10 11(2) 32 12(2) 68 

‘Isabella’ 8(1) 3 12(2) 71 

‘Julie Anna’ 10(1) 10 11(2) 32 12(1) 70 

‘Le Rosetta’ 7(4) 6 9(1) 21 9(4) 56 9(4) 57 12(4) 102 9(4) 57 

‘Lemon Delight’ 10(4) 12 

‘Midas Gold’ 10(4) 12 11(4) 55 

‘Miro’ 7(1) 33 11(2) 56 

‘Polly Anna’ 7(4) 6 9(1) 21 9(4) 56 12(4) 102 

‘Primrose Petite’ 8(1) 3 9(2) 30 10(1) 48 9(3) 73 8(2) 31 

‘Rosetta’† 9(4) 57 9(4) 57 





Notice 

Surrendered/ 

Revoked/ 

Refused 

‘Shaggy Dog’ 10(4) 12 11(4) 55 

‘Sugar And Ice’syn 

X93040 8(2) 2 9(2) 30 10(1) 48 

‘Sugar Baby’ 6(3) 44 8(1) 17 9(2) 61 

‘Sugar Button’ 9(3) 11 10(3) 28 11(2) 53 

‘Sugar Lace’ 9(3) 10 10(3) 28 11(2) 53 

‘Summer Eyes’ 9(3) 10 10(3) 29 11(2) 53 

‘Summer Melody’ 10(3) 10 

‘Summer Pink’ 7(3) 6 8(3) 21 9(2) 61 

‘Summer Stars’ 11(4) 

‘Tanja’ 7(2) 4 10(2) 38 11(1) 64 

‘Ulyssis’ syn Butterfly 5(3) 15 5(3) 15 6(2) 5 10(4) 65 

‘Summer Angel’ 7(2) 8 8(1) 17 9(2) 61 

‘Surprise Party’ 7(2) 8 8(1) 18 9(2) 61 

Asplenium 

antiquum 

‘Victoria’ 6(2) 33 7(1) 11 8(1) 39 9(3) 73 

australasicum 

‘Crinkle Cut’ 3(2) 34 7(3) 49 

Aster 

hybrid 

‘Dark Milka’ 12(1) 11 12(4) 19 

‘Karmijn’ 10(4) 11 11(4) 55 

‘Karmijn Milka’ 12(1) 11 12(4) 19 

‘Mauve Parade’ 10(4) 11 11(4) 55 

‘Milka’ 10(4) 11 12(4) 20 

‘Peter’s White’ 12(1) 11 12(4) 21 

pringlei x novi-belgii 

‘Blue Butterfly’ 3(1) 37 9(2) 62 

‘Pink Butterfly’ 3(1) 37 9(2) 62 

‘Rose Butterfly’ 3(1) 37 9(2) 62 

‘White Butterfly’ 3(1) 37 9(2) 62 

Asteriscus 

maritimus 

‘Double Gold Coin’ syn 

Typ Gefullt 10(1) 8 10(1) 12 11(1) 62 

Astrebla 

lappacea 

‘Yanda’ syn 104C 9(2) 7 10(4) 23 10(4) 65 

pectinata 

‘Turanti’ syn 64A 9(2) 7 10(4) 19 10(4) 65 

Austromyrtus 

inophloia 

‘Aurora’ 8(2) 2 9(3) 17 10(2) 55 10(2) 59 

Avena 

sativa 

‘A.C.Assiniboia’syn 

Graza 68 10(4) 13 11(2) 34 12(1) 70 

‘AC Medallion’syn 

Moola 9(4) 9 10(1) 26 11(1) 64 10(2) 59 10(2) 60 

‘Barcoo’ syn QK 88-129 8(4) 6 9(3) 38 10(2) 57 

‘Bass’ 11(2) 14 12(1) 38 12(4) 100 12(1) 73 

‘Carrolup’ syn 81Q:346 6(4) 9 7(4) 27 10(4) 62 7(2) 29 

‘Cleanleaf’ 3(4) 38 3(4) 26 5(4) 5 

‘Condamine’ syn PO 475 6(2) 32 6(3) 38 8(2) 31 9(2) 63 

‘Coomallo’ syn 

WAOAT373 9(4) 9 10(1) 26 10(4) 62 

‘Dumont 68’† 

‘Ensiler’ syn 

10(2) 59 

SN 404, P.I.527933 6(2) 33 8(1) 39 




Notice 

Surrendered/ 

Revoked/ 

Refused 

‘Enterprise’ 4(4) 23 5(4) 12 6(3) 6 

‘Euro’ syn ME/45/7 7(3) 5 8(2) 25 9(2) 61 10(4) 65 

‘Graza 50’ 6(4) 6 7(2) 23 8(1) 38 

‘Graza 70’ 6(4) 6 7(2) 25 8(1) 38 12(1) 73 7(1) 33 

‘Gwydir’ 10(4) 13 11(3) 28 12(2) 69 11(3) 54 

‘Heritage Lordship’ 11(2) 14 12(1) 39 12(4) 100 12(2) 72 

‘Hotham’ 11(2) 14 11(2) 34 12(1) 70 

‘Nobby’ syn 81AB1710 5(2) 35 5(4) 18 6(3) 6 

‘Needilup’ 11(4) 11 12(1) 41 12(4) 100 

‘Nu Gene’ syn ND 930857212(1) 10 

‘Pallinup’ syn 81Q: 359 8(2) 4 9(4) 33 10(4) 62 

‘PO 519’† 11(3) 54 

‘PO 535’† 

‘Quoll’ 11(4) 11 

11(3) 54 


‘Riel’ 5(1) 22 5(1) 22 6(1) 6 

‘Targa’ 12(3) 11 

‘Toodyay’ syn 

WAOAT347 9(4) 9 10(1) 27 10(4) 62 

‘Vasse’ 11(2) 14 11(2) 35 12(1) 70 

‘Warrego’ 10(4) 13 11(3) 29 12(2) 69 11(3) 54 

Backhousia 

citriodora 

‘Harvest Home’ 9(3) 10 12(1) 73 

Banksia 

coccinea 

‘Waite Crimson’ 6(1) 28 8(2) 8 

‘Waite Flame’ 7(4) 7 8(2) 9 

hookeriana 

‘Waite Orange’ 4(2) 23 4(2) 9 5(2) 6 

spinulosa 

‘Birthday Candles’ 3(1) 37 3(1) 5 3(4) 4 6(3) 46 9(1) 37 

9(3) 73 12(2) 71 

Betula 

pendula 

‘Barossa Wintergreen’ 3(2) 34 3(4) 19 4(4) 5 10(1) 50 

Bidens 

feruifolia 

‘Innbid’ 10(1) 8 10(1) 14 11(1) 65 

Biserrula 

pelecinus 

‘Casbah’ syn Mor99 9(2) 5 10(2) 23 

Boronia 

heterophylla 

‘Cameo’ 3(4) 38 3(4) 25 5(2) 6 

‘Cameo Stripe’ 10(4) 10 12(2) 71 

‘Early Red’ 12(4) 102 

‘Just Margaret’ 6(1) 28 6(4) 42 7(4) 40 12(4) 102 

‘Moonglow’ 3(4) 38 3(4) 25 5(2) 6 

heterophylla x megastema 

‘Purple Jared’ 12(4) 10 

megastigma 

‘Royale’ 8(1) 3 9(1) 10 9(4) 55 

pinnata 

‘Golden Nola’ 4(3) 26 4(3) 22 5(4) 5 7(3) 49 

Bothriochloa 

bladhii 

‘Swann’ 8(2) 3 9(4) 29 10(3) 54 10(1) 51 

130




Notice 

Surrendered/ 

Revoked/ 

Refused 

insculpta 

‘Bisset’ 3(2) 34 3(2) 9 4(1) 4 3(4) 38 

pertusa 

‘Dawson’ 3(3) 26 5(1) 7 6(1) 6 

‘Medway’ 5(1) 8 5(1) 8 6(1) 6 

Bougainvillea 

glabra 

‘Krishna’ 11(1) 8 11(2) 18 12(1) 69 

hybrid 

‘Hot August Moon’ 10(2) 11 10(4) 64 

‘Jazzi’ 12(2) 11 

‘Jellibene’ 12(2) 11 

‘Little Guy’ 8(3) 5 9(1) 10 9(4) 55 

‘Majik’ 10(4) 10 11(2) 18 12(1) 69 

‘Marlu’ 12(2) 11 

‘Miski’ 10(2) 11 11(2) 18 12(1) 69 10(4) 61 

‘Nonya’ 10(4) 10 11(2) 19 12(1) 69 

‘Pedro’ 8(3) 5 10(1) 14 10(4) 61 

‘Siggi’ 12(2) 11 

‘Solar Flare’ 11(4) 10 11(4) 16 

‘Tosca’ 12(2) 11 

‘Toffi’ 12(2) 11 

‘Zuki’ 10(2) 11 11(2) 19 12(1) 69 

x spectoperuviana 

‘Mischief’ 8(1) 3 9(4) 18 10(3) 52 

Brachyscome 

hybrid 

‘Sunabell’ 11(4) 10 12(2) 25 

aff. formosa 

‘Happy Face’ syn 

PGA Form 93/1 7(3) 7 8(2) 31 9(4) 57 

‘Happy Face Pink’ syn 

PGA Form 93/2 7(3) 7 8(2) 31 9(4) 57 

angustifolia 

‘Hot Candy’ 10(4) 10 11(4) 17 12(3) 55 12(3) 57 

‘Hot Candy’ syn 

Candy Tuff† 

‘Mardi Gras’ 8(2) 3 9(3) 18 10(2) 55 


‘Mauve Delight’ 10(3) 9 11(4) 17 

angustifolia x multifida 

‘Just Jayne’ 6(4) 9 7(3) 40 9(3) 71 12(1) 73 

ascendens 

‘Lavender Mist’ 8(1) 3 9(3) 74 

ascendens x curvicarpa 

‘Sunset’ 8(3) 5 10(2) 60 

formosa 

‘Strawberry Mousse’ 6(2) 32 7(4) 22 9(3) 71 

multifida 

‘Blue Haze’ 5(2) 35 6(2) 14 7(4) 40 8(4) 52 

‘Compact Amethyst’ 12(4) 10 

‘Lemon Drops’ 5(2) 35 6(2) 15 7(4) 40 8(4) 52 

‘Pink Haze’ 5(2) 35 6(2) 13 7(4) 40 

‘Tiny Tots’ 6(1) 29 9(1) 37 

multifida x curvicarpa 

‘Lemon Twist’ 7(3) 7 10(1) 15 10(4) 61 10(4) 64 8(2) 31 

‘PGA.Brac 93/3’ 10(4) 64 

‘PGA.Brac 93/6’ 7(3) 7 8(2) 31 

‘PGA.Brac 93/8’ 7(3) 7 8(2) 31 

rigidula x multifida 

‘Toucan Tango’ 

syn Ultra 5(2) 34 5(2) 34 6(1) 6 8(4) 51 10(2) 60 

segmentosa 

‘92.PGASEG/1’ 7(3) 7 10(4) 64 

131



Notice 

Surrendered/ 

Revoked/ 

Refused 

‘Misty Mauve’ 7(3) 7 10(1) 15 10(4) 61 10(1) 50 

10(4) 64 

segmentosa x curvicarpa 

‘Sunburst’ 6(4) 8 7(3) 38 9(2) 60 

segmentosa x procumbens 

‘Sunblush’ 9(3) 9 11(4) 55 

Bracteantha 

bracteata 

‘Argyle Star’ 10(1) 8 11(2) 36 12(1) 70 

‘Ashton Argyle’ 11(2) 15 12(2) 71 

‘Broome Pearl’ 12(1) 12 12(3) 29 

‘Cable Beach’ 11(2) 15 

‘Carrawine’ 11(2) 15 

‘Colourburst Gold’ 12(4) 12 

‘Colourburst Pink’ 11(1) 8 11(3) 31 12(2) 69 

‘Gold ‘N’ Bronze’ 8(2) 3 9(3) 19 10(2) 56 12(3) 57 

‘Greta’ 10(2) 11 

‘Kalgoorlie Gold’ 12(1) 12 12(3) 30 

‘Lemon Colourburst’ 11(1) 8 11(2) 36 12(1) 70 

‘Margaret McArthur’ 10(2) 11 

‘Menindee Magic’ 10(1) 9 11(2) 36 12(1) 70 11(3) 54 

‘NN-9812AE’ 12(4) 12 

‘NN-B9821A’ 12(4) 12 

‘NN-B9892’ 12(4) 12 

‘Nullarbor Flame’ 10(1) 8 10(4) 35 

‘Pindan’ 11(2) 14 

‘Spectrum’ 9(1) 4 10(2) 31 11(1) 63 

‘Sunraysia Splendour’ 10(1) 9 11(2) 37 12(1) 71 

Brassica 

napus 

‘46C01’ 12 (1) 11 

‘47C02’ 12 (1) 11 

‘Barossa’ 3(1) 37 3(3) 9 4(3) 6 8(3) 53 

‘Charlton’ 11(4) 10 12(4) 24 

‘Clancy’ syn BLN 973 9(3) 9 9(4) 18 10(3) 53 9(4) 57 

10(3) 56 

‘Drum’ syn BLN 971 9(3) 9 9(4) 18 10(3) 53 9(4) 57 

10(3) 56 

‘Dunkeld’ syn RF3 7(2) 5 8(4) 40 9(3) 71 

‘Grouse’ syn BLN 884 9(4) 8 10(4) 20 11(3) 51 10(3) 56 

‘Hobson’ 1(4) 23 2(2) 12 3(1) 4 

‘Hylite 200TT’ 11(4) 10 12(4) 25 

‘Karoo’ syn TI 7 9(1) 5 10(4) 20 11(3) 51 10(4) 64 

‘Monola-31’ syn HD1*4 4(4) 23 5(1) 26 

‘Monola-32’ syn 

HB1*1-3 4(4) 23 5(1) 26 

‘Monty’ syn BLN 900 9(4) 8 10(4) 21 11(3) 51 10(3) 56 

‘Mystic’ 11(3) 10 11(4) 55 12(3) 55 

‘Narendra’ 5(2) 35 6(4) 18 7(4) 40 5(4) 35 

7(2) 29 

‘Oscar’ syn BLN500 5(2) 35 8(3) 10 9(2) 60 

‘Rainbow’ syn RE9 7(2) 5 8(4) 40 9(3) 71 

‘Range’ syn AGA94-18 9(4) 8 10(4) 21 11(3) 51 

‘Scoop’ syn BLN 877 9(3) 9 9(4) 19 10(3) 53 9(4) 57 

10(3) 56 

‘Siren’ 7(2) 8 8(4) 40 9(3) 71 11(4) 18 

‘Striker’ 10(3) 9 12(3) 57 10(4) 65 

‘Surpass 600’ 11(4) 10 12(4) 28 

‘Surpass 600TT’ 11(4) 10 12(4) 29 

‘TI 10’ 9(2) 6 10(4) 22 11(3) 52 10(4) 64 

‘TI1 Pinnacle’ syn TI1 10(1) 9 10(4) 22 11(3) 52 10(4) 64 

‘Yickadee’ 3(1) 37 3(3) 8 4(3) 6 8(3) 53 

oleifera 

‘Ag Emblem’ 12(2) 11 12(4) 102 

132




Notice 

Surrendered/ 

Revoked/ 

Refused 

‘BLN 1400’† 

‘Bugle’ 12(2) 11 


‘Emblem’† 

‘Georgie’ 12(3) 10 


‘Insignia’ 12(3) 10 

‘Purler’ 12(3) 10 12(4) 26 

‘Ripper’ 12(3) 10 12(4) 26 12(4) 102 

‘Trooper’ 12(2) 11 

Bromus 

stamineus 

‘Grasslands Gala’ 4(4) 23 5(1) 12 6(1) 6 

Brunfelsia 

latifolia 

‘Sweet Petite’† 

‘Sweet & Petite’ 11(4) 10 12(4) 23 



Buchloe 

dactyloides 

‘609’ syn 609 

Buffalograss† 

‘Oasis’ 5(4) 33 12(3) 19 6(4) 54 

11(1) 65 

11(1) 65 11(2) 56 

Buddleia 

asiatica 

‘Spring Promise’† 

‘Sweet Promise’ 6(3) 43 8(4) 39 9(3) 71 

7(4) 41 

7(2) 29 

7(4) 41 

hybrid 

‘Wattle Bird’ 8(4) 5 8(4) 39 9(3) 71 

Callistemon 

salignus 

‘Fireball’† 

‘Great Balls Of Fire’ 3(4) 38 4(1) 10 5(1) 7 

4(1) 25 

4(1) 25 

9(2) 62 

Calibrachoa (Petunia) 

hybrid 

‘Liricashower’ 12(1) 12 12(4) 102 

‘Liricashower Blue’ 12(1) 12 12(4) 102 

Camellia 

hybrid 

‘Sweet Jane’ 9(2) 6 10(2) 26 11(1) 63 10(3) 56 

sasanqua 

‘First Cover’ syn 

Classique 10(1) 9 10(1) 16 10(4) 61 

‘Marge Miller’ 8(1) 3 8(3) 10 9(2) 60 10(3) 57 

‘Paradise Audrey’ 8(4) 5 10(2) 25 11(1) 63 

‘Paradise Belinda’ 6(3) 44 7(3) 33 8(2) 30 

‘Paradise Helen’ 8(4) 5 10(2) 25 11(1) 63 

‘Paradise Joan’ 10(3) 9 11(3) 15 

‘Paradise Little Liane’ 6(3) 44 7(3) 34 8(2) 30 

‘Paradise Petite’ 6(3) 44 7(3) 32 8(2) 30 

‘Paradise Sayaka’ 10(3) 9 11(3) 16 

‘Paradise Venessa’ 6(3) 44 7(3) 35 8(2) 30 

‘Parbarb’ 12(1) 10 

‘Parbev’ 12(1) 10 

‘Parbjane’ 12(1) 10 

‘Parblynda’ 12(1) 10 

‘Parcaroline’ 12(1) 10 

‘Pardiana’ 12(1) 10 

‘Pargillian’ 12(1) 10 

‘Parjenni’ 12(1) 10 

‘Parjennifer’ 12(1) 10 

133



Notice 

Surrendered/ 

Revoked/ 

Refused 

‘Parjill’ 12(1) 10 

‘Parleonie’ 12(1) 10 

‘Parlouise’ 12(1) 10 

‘Parodette’ 12(1) 10 

‘Parsusan’ 12(1) 10 

‘Snowcloud’ 9(4) 8 10(2) 26 11(1) 63 

Campanula 

punctata 

‘Mystic Bells’ 11(3) 10 11(4) 15 

Canna 

hybrid 

‘Phasion’ syn 

Pink Phasion 8(3) 5 9(2) 16 10(1) 47 12(3) 57 8(4) 52 

Cantharellus 

cibarius 

‘Cantherelle’ syn Fanar 11(3) 10 

Capsicum 

annuum 

‘Peppadew’ syn 

Steenkamp 10(3) 9 11(3) 17 10(4) 64 


annuum var fasiculatum 

‘Bantam’ syn R10 10(2) 11 11(2) 21 12(1) 69 11(1) 65 11(2) 56 

‘Orange Bantam’ 11(3) 10 12(4) 33 

‘Thimble’ syn T6 10(2) 11 11(2) 21 12(1) 69 11(1) 65 11(2) 56 

annuum var longum 

‘Kalocsai 90’ syn 

Fantasy Elixir 9(4) 8 11(4) 36 12(3) 56 11(4) 56 

Carthamus 

tinctorius 

‘S-501’ 8(3) 7 9(4) 57 

Caustis 

blekei 

‘Forest Fantasy’ 12(3) 11 

Celosia 

aregentea var cristata 

‘Martine Pink’ 11(2) 13 

‘Martine Red’ 11(2) 13 

‘Martine Yellow’ 11(2) 13 

Cenchrus 

ciliaris 

‘Bella’ 6(3) 45 7(1) 29 8(1) 38 

‘Viva’ 6(3) 45 7(1) 31 8(1) 38 

Centrosema 

pubescens 

‘Cardillo’ 9(3) 9 10(3) 17 11(1) 66 

Ceratopetalum 

Gummiferum 

‘Bill Winter’ 12(1) 11 

‘KSCL2’ 12(1) 11 

‘VIC 90-1’ 9(1) 5 12(1) 27 12(4) 100 

134




Notice 

Surrendered/ 

Revoked/ 

Refused 

Chamelaucium 

floriferum 

‘Lady Jennifer’ 3(1) 37 3(1) 19 7(4) 38 12(4) 103 

floriferum x uncinatum 

‘Crystal’ 8(4) 8 10(2) 52 11(1) 65 

‘Tickled Pink’ 4(4) 23 5(2) 11 6(1) 7 6(3) 6 

megalopetalum x uncinatum 

‘Albany Pearl’ 11(2) 15 

‘Blondie’ 7(3) 9 9(2) 54 10(1) 49 

‘Denmark Pearl’ 11(2) 15 

‘Esperance Pearl’ 10(2) 14 

‘Esperance Velvet’ 10(2) 14 12(3) 57 

‘Madonna’ 6(4) 7 9(2) 56 10(1) 49 

‘Painted Lady’ 6(4) 7 9(2) 57 10(1) 49 

‘Revelation’ 6(1) 28 9(2) 58 10(1) 49 

uncinatum 

‘Cascade Brilliance’ 9(3) 12 11(2) 50 12(1) 72 

‘Cascade Brook’ syn 

GW 53 6(3) 45 9(2) 52 10(1) 49 

‘Cascade Jewel’ syn 

GW57 6(3) 45 8(1) 37 8(4) 50 

‘Cascade Mist’ syn 

GW 22 6(3) 45 7(3) 36 8(2) 31 7(1) 33 

8(3) 53 

‘Dancing Queen’ 11(4) 12 

‘Elegance’ 4(1) 25 4(1) 9 7(4) 38 12(3) 57 4(2) 24 

‘Jenny Jane’ 5(3) 17 9(3) 67 10(4) 63 12(4) 103 

‘Jubilee Jade’ 5(3) 17 9(3) 67 11(2) 55 10(2) 59 


‘Jubilee’† 

‘Jurien Brook’ 10(2) 14 

10(2) 59 

‘Kismet’ 5(3) 17 9(3) 68 10(4) 63 12(4) 103 

‘Muchea Mauve’ 5(3) 17 9(3) 70 10(4) 63 12(4) 103 

‘Niribi’ syn 

NEWP 001; GW44 4(3) 26 5(1) 11 6(1) 5 8(4) 51 

‘Ofir’ 11(3) 12 

‘Pearl Buttons’ 4(2) 23 4(2) 15 8(4) 50 12(4) 103 4(3) 26 

8(2) 31 

‘Pristine’ 4(2) 23 4(2) 16 9(3) 74 4(3) 26 

8(2) 31 

‘Triumphant’ 4(2) 23 4(2) 16 7(4) 38 12(4) 103 

‘Tutu’ 6(4) 7 11(3) 65 

‘Variegated Blush’ 3(1) 37 3(1) 18 7(4) 38 12(4) 103 

‘White Spring’ 3(1) 37 3(1) 17 7(4) 38 12(4) 103 3(3) 26 

uncinatum x axillare 

‘GW1’ 12(3) 13 

‘My Sweet Sixteen’ 11(4) 12 

uncinatum x ciliatum 

‘Eric John’ 3(1) 37 3(1) 17 7(4) 38 12(4) 103 3(3) 26 

uncinatum x forestii 

‘Whitefire’ syn 

White With Red Buds 4(3) 26 6(4) 13 8(2) 31 10(1) 50 

uncinatum x megalopetalum 

‘ADI’ 11(4) 12 

uncinatum x micranthum 

‘Comet’ syn 

Mid Microwax (63(A) 4(3) 26 6(4) 13 7(4) 39 10(1) 50 

‘Earlybird’ syn 

Early White 1166(E) 4(3) 26 6(4) 12 7(4) 39 

‘Moonstar’ syn 

Late Microwax (63) 4(3) 26 6(4) 13 7(4) 39 10(1) 50 

‘Moonstruck’ syn 

White Miniwax 300(A) 4(3) 26 6(4) 12 7(4) 39 10(1) 50 

‘Plumwhite’ syn 

Miniwax (28) 4(3) 26 6(4) 12 7(4) 39 10(1) 50 

135



Notice 

Surrendered/ 

Revoked/ 

Refused 

‘Supernova’ syn 

Microwax 63(F) 4(3) 26 6(4) 12 7(4) 39 10(1) 50 

xverticordia hybrid 

‘Jasper’ 10(2) 14 

Cheiranthus 

mutabilis 

‘Joy Gold’ 5(4) 34 7(4) 41 

Chloris 

gayana 

‘Capital’ 6(2) 31 8(3) 53 

‘Finecut’ 6(2) 31 10(4) 47 11(4) 53 

‘Nemkat’ 8(2) 5 10(4) 47 

‘Topcut’ 6(2) 31 10(4) 48 11(4) 53 

Choisya 

ternata 

‘Lich’ syn Sundance 2(2) 30 3(2) 8 4(1) 25 2(3) 23 

Chrysanthemum 

frutescens 

‘Camilla Ponticelli’ 3(3) 26 9(1) 12 10(4) 61 

sp 

‘Alcala’ 8(3) 5 9(3) 20 

‘Boskoop’ 8(3) 5 9(3) 21 10(3) 56 

‘Cobra’† 

‘Dark Red Marconi’ 

10(3) 56 

‘Red Elani’ 8(3) 5 9(3) 21 

‘Samco’ 8(3) 5 9(3) 22 

‘Tripoli’ 8(3) 5 9(3) 22 

‘Veria Dark’ 8(4) 5 9(3) 22 

Cicer 

arietinum 

‘Barwon’ 3(2) 34 3(2) 28 5(2) 6 

‘G846-2-5’† 

‘Bumper’ 10(2) 11 12(3) 21 



‘Heera’ 11(1) 65 

‘Narayen’ 7(3) 49 

‘Norwin’ syn 243-7 5(3) 16 5(3) 16 6(2) 5 

‘Sona’ 11(1) 65 

‘T1315’† 

‘Gully’ 10(2) 11 12(3) 21 



Citrus 

(unshiu x sinensis) x unshiu 

‘Tsunokaori’ 7(2) 7 9(2) 17 

reticulata 

‘Eloise’ syn IM 11 6(3) 45 10(3) 56 

‘Monarch’ syn 

IH-66-5-15 7(3) 6 

‘Success’ 5(3) 18 11(4) 55 

reticulata hybrid 

‘Sunset’ 4(3) 26 4(3) 23 5(3) 6 

reticulata x sinensis 

‘IrM1’ 11(4) 11 

sinensis 

‘Autumn Gold 

Late Navel’ 2(1) 14 8(2) 25 11(1) 65 

‘Barnfield Late Navel’ 2(1) 14 8(2) 27 11(2) 53 9(4) 57 

‘Chislett Summer Navel’ 2(1) 14 6(2) 6 7(2) 28 

‘Edwards Summer Navel’2(1) 14 3(2) 34 

‘Powell Late Navel’† 

‘Powell Summer Navel’ 2(1) 14 8(2) 27 

8(4) 51 

8(4) 51 

136




Notice 

Surrendered/ 

Revoked/ 

Refused 

‘Rohde Summer Navel’ 

‘Summer Gold 

2(1) 14 11(1) 45 12(1) 71 8(3) 53 a 2(2) 31 

Late Navel’ 2(1) 14 6(2) 5 7(2) 28 

‘Toomey Summer Navel’ 2(1) 14 3(2) 34 

7(3) 49 

‘Weller Red’ 5(4) 34 8(4) 43 9(3) 71 

Clematis 

aristata x gentianoides 

‘Southern Cross’ syn 

Garden Surprise 8(1) 4 9(2) 18 10(2) 55 11(3) 54 

cirrhosa 

‘Lansdowne Gem’ 12(2) 11 

hybrid 

‘Jenny Keay’ 9(2) 6 10(1) 16 10(4) 61 10(2) 60 

marmoraria x paniculata 

‘White Carpet’ 11(3) 10 

montana 

‘Broughton Star’ 12(2) 11 

‘Starlight’ 8(3) 5 9(4) 24 10(3) 53 

serratifolia 

‘Kugotia’ syn Tiara Gold 10(3) 9 

Codium 

variegatum 

‘Grubell’ syn Bell 11(2) 13 

Coleonema 

pulchellum 

‘Mellow Yellow’ 12(1) 11 

Convolvulus 

sabatius 

‘White Gladys’ 11(2) 13 11(4) 35 

‘Star Struck’ 12(2) 12 

Coprosma 

repens 

‘Rainbow Surprise’ 8(3) 5 9(2) 31 10(1) 48 11(1) 66 

Cordyline 

australis 

‘Kiwi Dazzler’ 6(4) 6 10(1) 50 

Coreopsis 

grandiflora 

‘Summer Gold’ 3(1) 37 3(1) 35 3(4) 4 9(4) 57 

Cornus 

alba 

‘Bailhalo’ syn Ivory Halo 10(2) 11 

florida 

‘D-376-15’ 9(4) 8 

hybrid 

‘Rutcan’ syn 

Constellation 9(3) 9 10(3) 21 11(2) 53 11(2) 56 

kousa x florida 

‘Rutdan’ syn Celestial 9(3) 9 10(3) 21 11(2) 53 

Corymbia (Eucalyptus) 

maculata 

‘Imagine’ 11(3) 12 12(3) 45 

Cucumis 

melo 

‘Rainbow’ 2(3) 23 4(1) 25 

a Withdrawn but later reinstated 

137



Notice 

Surrendered/ 

Revoked/ 

Refused 

Cucurbita 

maxima 

‘Dulong QHI’ 10(4) 14 12(4) 51 

‘Eudlo QHI’ 10(4) 14 

‘Redlands Trailblazer’ 3(4) 38 4(2) 5 5(2) 6 10(3) 56 

moschata 

‘Loana 52’ 9(1) 7 10(2) 44 11(1) 64 9(2) 63 

Cuphea 

hyssopifolia 

‘Golden Ruby’ syn 

Cocktail 3(3) 26 3(3) 21 5(1) 7 

‘Karissa’ 12(1) 11 

‘Little Hatter’ 11(3) 10 

‘Louisa’ 10(2) 11 11(2) 20 12(1) 69 

‘Shona’ 12(1) 11 

‘Victoria’ 12(4) 11 

llavea 

‘Tiny Mice’ syn 

Georgia Scarlet 8(3) 5 9(4) 26 10(3) 53 

Cupressocyparis 

hybrid 

‘Atlas’ 6(2) 31 9(1) 12 9(4) 55 

‘Gold Medal’ syn 

Peter Nitschke 5(2) 10 5(2) 10 6(1) 7 5(3) 21 

leylandii 

‘Ferngold’ 9(1) 5 12(4) 103 

‘Grelive’ syn 

Olive’s Green 6(1) 28 9(1) 37 

‘Gold Rider’ 3(1) 37 3(1) 21 3(4) 4 

Cupressus 

glabra 

‘Highlight’ 12(3) 10 12(3) 18 

‘Limelight’ 4(3) 26 4(3) 22 5(3) 5 

‘Limeglow’ 12(3) 10 12(3) 19 

macrocarpa 

‘Golden Halo’ 3(2) 34 4(1) 6 5(1) 7 

sempervirens 

‘Gold Pillar’ 7(2) 8 8(2) 12 9(4) 55 9(4) 57 12(4) 103 

‘Olympic Gold’† 9(4) 57 

Cyathea 

cooperi 

‘Allyn Krest’ 8(2) 6 9(4) 24 10(3) 53 

‘Allyn Lace’ 7(3) 9 9(4) 24 10(3) 53 

Cymbidium 

hybrid 

‘Atlantis’ 11(3) 11 

Cynara 

scolymus 

‘Imperial Star’ syn 

UC-IS-89 (86-024) 6(4) 8 7(3) 39 8(3) 52 

Cynodon 

dactylon 

‘Cheyenne’ 3(4) 38 4(3) 26 

‘Plateau’ 11(1) 8 12(2) 27 

‘Riley’s Super Sport’ 8(2) 3 9(2) 20 10(1) 47 8(4) 51 

‘Riley’s Evergreen’ 11(2) 13 12(3) 24 

‘Windsor Green’ 6(2) 29 6(2) 29 7(1) 32 

138



dactylon ssp.pulchellus 

‘Wirlga’ 10(2) 12 11(3) 27 

dactylon x transvaalensis 

‘Champion Dwarf’ 9(4) 8 12(1) 31 

Cynoglossum 

amabile 

‘Sweet Elise’ 10(1) 9 


Notice 

Surrendered/ 

Revoked/ 

Refused 

Dactylis 

glomerata 

‘Grasslands Excel’ 12(4) 10 12(4) 30 

‘Grasslands Kara’ 2(3) 23 2(3) 18 3(2) 5 

‘Grasslands Vision’ 11(2) 13 11(3) 19 12(2) 68 

Dahlia 

pinnata 

‘Dappled Dancer’ 7(2) 5 10(1) 50 

‘Jodie’ 7(2) 5 10(1) 50 

‘Kaleidoscope’ 7(2) 5 12(1) 73 

variabilis 

‘Elly’ syn RS 84540 6(1) 31 7(2) 29 

‘Robetty’ syn Betty 6(1) 31 7(2) 29 

‘Rolinda’ syn Linda 6(1) 31 7(2) 29 

‘Rosconnie’ syn Conny 6(1) 31 7(2) 29 

‘Rosmargareth’ syn 

Margareth 6(1) 31 7(2) 29 

‘Rowendy’ syn Wendy 6(1) 31 7(2) 29 

‘Simon’ syn RS 84943 6(1) 31 7(2) 29 

Danthonia 

linkii 

‘Bunderra’ 4(4) 23 5(1) 20 6(1) 5 

richardsonii 

‘Hume’ 8(1) 6 8(1) 36 9(1) 36 

‘Taranna’ 4(4) 23 5(1) 18 6(1) 5 

Daphne 

odora 

‘Star White’ 7(3) 6 8(3) 53 

Desmanthus 

virgatus 

‘Bayamo’ 5(3) 18 8(1) 14 8(4) 49 

‘Marc’ 5(3) 18 8(1) 14 8(4) 49 

‘Uman’ 5(3) 18 8(1) 14 8(4) 49 

Dianthus 

barbatus hybrid 

‘Stagiten’ syn 

Pink Gypsy 4(1) 25 4(1) 15 5(1) 7 12(1) 73 

barbatus x superbus 

‘Stagibrig’ syn 

Bright Eye Gypsy 4(1) 25 4(1) 16 5(1) 6 8(3) 53 4(2) 23 

‘Stagidark’ syn 

Dark Eye Gypsy 4(1) 25 4(1) 15 5(1) 7 8(3) 53 4(2) 23 

‘Stagigi’ syn Giant Gipsy 4(1) 25 4(1) 15 7(3) 49 

caryophyllus 

‘Cana’ 3(2) 34 3(3) 14 9(1) 37 

‘Chandenn’ 1(3) 13 2(1) 9 3(1) 4 2(3) 23 5(3) 6 

‘Charodeyka’ 1(3) 13 2(1) 6 3(1) 4 2(1) 15 10(2) 60 

‘Fantastic’ 1(3) 13 2(1) 4 3(1) 5 2(1) 15 5(3) 6 

‘Grozdana’ syn Dana 1(3) 13 2(1) 4 3(1) 4 2(3) 23 5(3) 6 

2(1) 15 

‘Kovalya’ syn Valya 2 3(3) 26 9(1) 37 

139



Notice 

Surrendered/ 

Revoked/ 

Refused 

‘Mechta’ 1(3) 13 2(1) 7 3(1) 4 2(1) 15 5(3) 6 

‘Neshka’ 1(3) 13 2(1) 7 3(2) 5 2(1) 15 5(3) 6 2(2) 31 

‘Odile’ 1(3) 13 2(1) 4 3(1) 4 2(1) 15 5(3) 6 

‘Pirin’ 1(3) 13 2(1) 8 3(2) 5 2(1) 15 5(3) 6 

‘Prolet’ 1(3) 13 2(1) 9 3(1) 5 3(4) 38 5(3) 6 

‘Rubin’† 

‘Rubinen’ 1(3) 13 2(1) 8 3(1) 4 

2(1) 15 

2(1) 15 5(3) 6 

‘Srebrina’ 3(2) 34 3(3) 13 9(1) 37 

‘Stacorpi’ syn Pink Corso 3(4) 38 6(1) 7 

7(3) 49 

‘Stalipink’ syn Pink Pisa 3(4) 38 10(1) 50 

‘Stapisou’ syn Flash 3(4) 38 6(1) 7 

‘Starotang’ syn Espana 3(4) 38 10(1) 50 

‘Statas’ syn Tasman 4(1) 25 10(4) 23 11(3) 52 12(3) 57 

‘Statropur’ syn Gipsy 3(4) 38 11(3) 17 12(2) 68 12(2) 72 

‘Stayelpa’ syn 

Las Palmas 3(4) 38 10(1) 50 

‘Valya’ 1(3) 13 2(1) 6 3(2) 5 2(1) 15 5(3) 6 

‘Victoria’† 

‘Zlatka’ 1(3) 13 2(1) 8 3(1) 5 

2(3) 23 

2(1) 15 5(3) 6 

‘Zora’ 1(3) 13 2(1) 9 3(1) 4 2(1) 15 10(2) 60 

‘Zornitza’ 1(3) 13 2(1) 4 3(2) 5 5(3) 6 

hybrid 

‘Crossover’ 7(4) 6 9(2) 21 10(1) 47 11(1) 66 

‘Far Out’ 7(4) 6 9(2) 21 10(1) 47 11(1) 66 

‘Stagilac’ syn 

Lilac Gypsy 4(1) 25 4(1) 15 5(1) 7 12(1) 73 

‘Codianki’ 12(4) 10 

plumarius 

‘Far East’ 8(3) 6 9(4) 27 10(3) 54 11(4) 55 

‘Far North’ 6(4) 6 8(2) 12 9(1) 35 11(1) 66 

‘Fury’ 8(3) 6 9(4) 27 11(1) 65 

‘Royal Velvet’ 8(3) 6 9(4) 27 10(4) 61 11(4) 55 

‘Spot On’ 8(3) 6 9(4) 27 10(3) 54 11(4) 55 

x plumarius 

‘Checkmate’ 6(4) 6 7(4) 41 

‘Neat N Tidy’ 6(4) 6 7(4) 41 

Diascia 

barberae 

‘Fiona’ 8(1) 4 10(4) 24 12(1) 69 

‘Strawberry Sundae’ 7(2) 8 8(1) 15 9(1) 36 

hybrid 

‘Apricot Cherub’ 8(3) 6 9(3) 24 10(4) 61 

‘Coral Belle’ 10(1) 9 10(4) 24 11(3) 52 

‘Codiape’ 12(4) 11 

‘Codiach’ 12(4) 11 

‘Hecbon’ syn Blue Bonnet 12(1) 11 

‘Hecrace’ syn Red Ace 12(1) 11 

‘Jacqueline’s Joy’ 6(4) 7 9(3) 25 10(2) 55 10(4) 64 

‘Joyce’s Choice’ 6(4) 7 9(3) 25 10(2) 55 10(4) 64 

‘Lady Valerie’ 9(3) 25 10(2) 56 10(4) 64 

‘Lilac Belle’ 6(4) 8 9(3) 25 10(2) 56 10(4) 64 

‘Lilac Mist’ 6(4) 7 9(3) 27 10(2) 56 10(4) 64 

‘Salmon Supreme’ 6(4) 6 9(3) 27 10(2) 56 10(4) 64 

sp 

‘Raspberry Sundae’ 9(2) 6 10(2) 60 

Dichanthium 

aristatum 

‘Floren’ 8(2) 2 9(4) 17 10(3) 52 10(1) 51 

Dieffenbachia 

hybrid 

‘Golden Sunset’ 5(1) 25 6(2) 13 8(4) 49 

140




Notice 

Surrendered/ 

Revoked/ 

Refused 

‘Paco’ syn TS 8704 8(4) 5 9(4) 29 10(3) 54 

‘TS8567’ syn 

Tropic Marianne 6(2) 30 6(2) 30 8(4) 49 

Digitaria 

didactyla 

‘PS 21’† 

‘Aussiblue’ 10(3) 12 

11(2) 56 

11(2) 56 


milanjiana 

‘Strickland’ 8(2) 3 8(3) 11 9(2) 60 

Dionaea 

muscipula 

‘Clayton’s Red Sunset’ 9(4) 10 11(1) 65 

‘Clayton’s Volcanic Red’ 9(4) 10 10(4) 64 

‘Royal Red’ 6(2) 31 7(2) 16 8(3) 53 6(4) 54 7(3) 49 

Duranta 

repens 

‘Sheenas Green’ 11(2) 13 

Echinochloa 

frumentacea 

‘Indus’ 7(1) 5 7(4) 29 8(3) 52 11(3) 54 

Eragrostis 

elongata 

‘Elvera’ 10(3) 10 

Eremocitrus 

glauca 

‘Australian Outback’ 10(1) 9 

Erysimum 

bicolor 

‘Lilac Joy’ 10(1) 11 11(2) 49 12(2) 70 

xbicolor 

‘Maur Joy’ 10(3) 12 11(4) 55 

linifolia 

‘Dawn Breaker’ 11(3) 12 11(4) 46 

Eucalyptus 

albens 

‘Whiteward’ 3(4) 38 5(4) 35 

camaldulensis 

‘Redward’ 3(4) 38 5(4) 35 

conica 

‘Woolward’ 3(4) 38 5(4) 35 

erythronema 

‘Urrbrae Gem’ 4(2) 23 6(3) 46 

largiflorens 

‘Green Variant’ 7(3) 5 8(4) 51 

melliodora 

‘Yelloward’ 3(4) 38 5(4) 35 

ptychocarpa x ficifolia 

‘Summer Beauty’ syn 

Number 13 8(1) 4 9(1) 15 9(4) 55 9(1) 37 

9(2) 63 

‘Summer Red’ syn 

Number 79 8(4) 5 9(1) 16 9(4) 55 

robusta 

‘Aussie Spirit’ syn 

VIC 97-3† 

‘The Green and Gold’ 10(4) 15 12(3) 46 

11(1) 64 

11(1) 64 

141



Notice 

Surrendered/ 

Revoked/ 

Refused 

rubida 

‘Candleward’ 3(4) 38 5(4) 35 

sideroxylon 

‘Blackward’ 3(4) 38 5(4) 35 

tereticornis 

‘Rainbow Wizard’ 12(2) 11 

Eupatorium 

ligustrinum 

‘Snowdrift’ syn 

Snowflake 5(4) 33 7(3) 49 

8(1) 39 

Euphorbia 

dipladenia 

‘Milkmaid’ 5(3) 19 10(2) 60 

milii 

‘Stibia’ syn Bianca 6(1) 29 6(3) 36 7(2) 29 

milii hybrid 

‘Stigaro’ syn 

Gabriela Red 3(2) 34 3(3) 11 4(2) 4 

‘Stiloga’ syn Gabi 3(2) 34 3(3) 11 4(2) 4 

‘Stirot’ syn Rosemarie 3(2) 34 3(3) 11 4(2) 4 

pulcherrima 

‘268 Pink’ syn Eckespoint 

Celebrate 2 Pink 8(3) 7 9(3) 43 10(2) 57 10(2) 59 

‘490 Marble’ syn Eckespoint 

Freedom Marble 8(3) 7 9(3) 44 10(2) 57 

‘490 Red’ syn Eckespoint 

Freedom Red 8(3) 7 9(3) 44 10(2) 57 10(2) 59 

‘490 White’† 10(2) 59 

‘490’† 10(2) 59 

‘Celebrate 2 Pink’† 

‘Duecabrired’ syn Red Fox 

10(2) 59 

Tabaluga Red 12(2) 14 12(3) 32 12(3) 57 

‘Duecap’ syn Red Fox 

Capri Red 10(4) 13 10(4) 39 11(3) 52 

‘Duecohopi’ syn Red Fox 

Coco Hot Pink 12(2) 14 12(3) 33 

‘Dueday’ syn Red Fox 

Highlight White 10(4) 13 10(4) 39 11(3) 53 

‘Duedeluxe’ syn Red Fox 

Deluxe 12(2) 14 12(3) 34 

‘Dueimco’ syn Red Fox 

Coco 2000 12(3) 12 12(3) 35 

‘Duemal’ syn Red Fox 

Mailbu Red 12(2) 14 12(3) 36 12(3) 57 

‘Duemenorca’ syn 

Red Fox Menorca Red 12(2) 71 

‘Duenidared’ syn Red Fox 

Victory Red 12(2) 14 12(3) 37 

‘Duespot’ syn Redfox 

Spotlight Dark Red 10(4) 13 10(4) 40 11(3) 53 

‘Duestarapri’ syn Red 

Fox Apricot Highlight 10(4) 13 10(4) 41 11(3) 53 

‘Eckespoint Freedom’† 

‘Eckespoint Monet’ 

10(2) 59 


‘Fiscor’ syn Cortez Red 11(4) 11 12(3) 38 12(1) 73 

‘Fiscor Crème’ syn 

Cortez White 11(4) 11 12(3) 39 12(1) 73 

‘Lemon Drop’ 5(3) 19 5(4) 30 6(4) 53 

‘Marblestar’ 12(2) 71 

‘Moni’ syn Red Fox Moni 12(2) 14 12(4) 102 

‘Pepride’ 12(4) 12 

142




Notice 

Surrendered/ 

Revoked/ 

Refused 

‘Peterstar Jingle Bells’ 12(4) 102 

‘Peterstar Marble’ 12(1) 74 

‘Peterstar Pink’ 12(1) 74 

‘Peterstar White’ 12(1) 74 

‘Pink Peppermint’ 5(3) 19 5(4) 31 6(3) 6 

‘Success’ 12(4) 12 

‘White Freedom’ syn Eckespoint 

Freedom White 8(3) 7 9(3) 45 10(2) 57 10(2) 59 

Feijoa 

sellowiana 

‘Duffy’ 4(3) 26 5(4) 9 6(3) 6 

Festuca 

arundinacea 

‘Bombina’ 7(3) 7 9(2) 52 10(1) 49 

‘Creole’ 11(4) 12 

‘Currawong’ 11(4) 12 

‘Encore’ 11(4) 12 

‘Flecha’ syn 

Grasslands Flecha 12(1) 13 

‘Fraydo’ 11(4) 12 

‘Grasslands Advance’ syn 

G48 6(3) 45 6(3) 41 7(3) 47 

‘Midwin’ 7(2) 8 9(2) 52 10(1) 49 

‘Resolute’ syn El Pampa 12(1) 13 

Ficus 

benjamina 

‘Bushy King’† 12(1) 72 

‘Bushy Prince’† 

‘Citation’ syn Curly Ben 6(1) 31 7(3) 19 8(2) 31 


‘Curly’ 8(3) 8 9(2) 62 

‘Francis’ syn Francis 

Goldstar 8(2) 6 9(3) 70 10(3) 55 10(2) 60 

‘Indigo’ 10(2) 14 

‘Marole’ syn Bushy King 10(4) 15 12(1) 59 12(4) 99 12(1) 72 

‘Mikkie’ syn Bushy Prince 10(4) 15 12(1) 60 12(4) 99 12(1) 72 

‘Midnight Beauty’ 9(4) 11 10(1) 42 10(4) 62 

‘Reginald’ 5(3) 20 7(3) 16 8(4) 51 

‘Twilight Beauty’ 10(4) 15 12(4) 102 

elastica 

‘Melany’ 12(2) 12 

‘Sylvie’ 10(4) 11 

rubiginosa 

‘Bonsai Bouy’ 7(3) 5 9(1) 37 

Fragaria 

grandiflora 

‘Pink Panda’ syn 

Cover Up’s 6(1) 28 10(2) 60 

hybrid 

‘Capitola’ 3(4) 38 9(4) 41 10(3) 55 

‘Oso Grande’ 2(4) 39 9(4) 42 10(3) 55 

‘Seascape’ 3(4) 38 9(4) 42 10(3) 55 

sp 

‘Irvine’ 2(4) 39 9(4) 57 

‘Mrak’ 2(4) 39 9(4) 57 

‘Muir’ 2(4) 39 9(4) 57 

‘Soquel’ 2(4) 39 7(2) 29 

‘Tustin’ 2(4) 39 7(2) 29 

‘Yolo’ 2(4) 39 9(4) 57 

143



Notice 

Surrendered/ 

Revoked/ 

Refused 

x ananassa 

‘Adina’ syn 89-064-2 10(1) 11 10(4) 64 

‘Alinta’ syn 91-012-39 10(2) 13 12(1) 51 12(4) 101 10(4) 64 

‘Anaheim’ 6(3) 45 

‘Cama’ 6(3) 46 

‘Carlsbad’ 6(3) 46 

‘Cartuno’ 8(3) 8 12(1) 52 12(4) 101 

‘Chandler’ 2(4) 39 5(2) 6 6(2) 4 

‘Coogee’ syn 88-027-583 6(3) 43 7(2) 21 8(2) 31 

‘Cuesta’ 6(3) 46 

‘Dorit’ 5(4) 32 

‘Euroka’ syn 90-035-17 10(2) 13 12(1) 53 12(4) 101 10(4) 64 

‘Fern’ 2(4) 39 5(2) 6 6(2) 4 9(2) 63 

‘Israeli Tamar’ 10(4) 15 

‘Kabarla’ syn 45/90 8(3) 8 8(3) 50 9(2) 62 

‘Kalang’ syn 88-015-150 10(1) 11 10(4) 64 11(4) 55 

‘Laguna’ 6(3) 46 

‘Lowanna’ syn 

92-021-433 10(2) 13 12(1) 53 12(4) 101 10(4) 64 

‘Malah’ 10(4) 14 

‘Maroochy Blaze’ 10(4) 14 12(4) 60 

‘Maroochy Flame’ 10(4) 14 12(4) 60 

‘Maroochy Jewel’ 12(1) 13 12(4) 61 

‘Maroochy Starfire’ 10(4) 15 12(4) 62 

‘Maroochy Sundew’ 12(1) 13 12(4) 63 

‘Mianjin’ syn 86/90 8(3) 8 9(4) 57 

‘Mindarie’ syn 

88-023-200 6(3) 43 7(2) 17 8(2) 31 

‘Nonda’ syn 91-103-7 10(2) 13 12(1) 54 12(4) 101 10(4) 64 

‘Ofra’ 5(4) 32 

‘Pandora’ 4(2) 23 7(1) 33 

‘Parker’ 2(4) 39 5(2) 7 6(2) 4 

‘Redlands Delight’ syn 

154/90 5(3) 19 6(4) 54 

‘Redlands Hope’syn 

192/90 5(3) 19 8(1) 33 8(4) 50 

‘Redlands Horizon’syn 

24/86 4(3) 26 8(1) 34 8(4) 50 11(4) 55 

‘Redlands Joy’ syn 

171/90 5(3) 19 8(1) 34 8(4) 50 

‘Redlands Pinnacle’ syn 

28/90 5(3) 19 8(1) 39 

‘Redlands Rose’ syn 

106/90 5(3) 19 6(4) 54 

‘Redlands Surprise’syn 

116/90 5(3) 19 6(4) 54 

‘Rosa Linda’ 12(3) 12 

‘Saaid’ 5(4) 32 11(4) 55 

‘Santana’ 2(4) 39 5(2) 7 6(2) 4 9(2) 63 

‘Selene’ 12(3) 12 

‘Selva’ 2(4) 39 5(2) 7 6(2) 4 

‘Shalom’ 5(4) 32 11(4) 55 

‘Smadar’ 5(4) 32 

‘Sunset’ 6(3) 45 

‘Sweet Charlie’ 9(1) 7 12(4) 63 

‘Talee’ syn 90-008-793 10(1) 11 10(4) 64 

‘Tallara’ syn 88-022-296 10(1) 11 10(4) 64 

‘Yael’ 10(4) 14 

Freesia 

hybrid 

‘Varayel’ syn 

Rapid Yellow 10(2) 12 

144




Notice 

Surrendered/ 

Revoked/ 

Refused 

Galtonia 

candicans 

‘Moonbeam’ 4(1) 25 4(2) 8 6(1) 6 

Gaura 

lindheimeri 

‘Corrie’s Gold’ 6(4) 7 8(3) 12 9(2) 60 11(2) 56 

‘Jo Adela’ 6(4) 7 8(3) 12 9(2) 60 11(2) 56 

‘Siskiyou Pink’ 10(2) 12 12(3) 25 

‘Siskiyou Compact Pink’ 11(4) 11 

‘Siskiyou PGA 1’ 12(2) 11 

‘So White’ 10(4) 11 12(4) 42 

Gazania 

hybrid 

‘Sunabout’ syn 

G10/0003 9(4) 8 11(4) 24 12(3) 55 

Geranium 

‘Pink Spice’ 8(4) 6 9(4) 30 10(3) 54 

Gleditsia 

triacanthos var. inermis 

‘Limegold’ 10(2) 12 10(4) 30 11(3) 52 

Glycine 

latifolia 

‘Capella’ syn CQ3368 7(1) 7 7(2) 26 8(1) 38 10(4) 65 

max 

‘9351’† 10(3) 56 

‘9521’† 

‘9582’ syn Soya 582 5(1) 25 6(4) 15 7(4) 41 

10(3) 56 

6(4) 54 11(4) 55 

‘9641’ syn Soya 641 5(1) 25 6(4) 16 7(4) 41 6(4) 54 11(4) 55 

‘9791’ syn Soya 791 5(1) 25 6(4) 17 8(4) 50 6(4) 54 

‘A5474’ 1(3) 13 2(2) 5 3(1) 4 2(1) 15 6(2) 5 

‘A5939’ 1(3) 13 2(2) 4 3(1) 4 2(1) 15 

‘A5980’ 4(1) 25 8(1) 39 

‘A6520’ 2(2) 31 2(2) 7 3(1) 4 6(2) 5 

‘Cawana’ syn NH3-30-1 9(3) 12 9(4) 40 10(3) 54 

‘Deltapine 726’ 8(1) 6 9(1) 37 

‘Koala’ syn 39/11 6(2) 33 7(3) 49 

‘Manark’ 2(1) 15 2(2) 6 3(1) 4 2(3) 23 

‘Melrose’ 11(1) 9 11(3) 47 12(2) 70 

‘Nitrobean 60’ syn PS16 7(2) 7 7(4) 31 8(4) 51 

‘Oxley’ 4(2) 23 4(3) 19 5(3) 5 10(2) 60 

‘PNR 2’ 5(1) 25 6(1) 31 

‘PNR 7’ 5(1) 25 6(1) 31 

‘PNR10’† 6(4) 54 

‘PNR3’† 6(4) 54 

‘PNR6’† 

‘Soya 351’ 9(1) 7 9(4) 39 10(3) 55 

6(4) 54 

10(3) 56 11(4) 55 

‘Soya 521’ 8(2) 6 9(4) 40 10(3) 55 10(3) 56 11(4) 55 

‘Warrigal’ 5(2) 14 5(2) 14 6(4) 53 

Gossypium 

hirsutum 

‘CS 50’ 5(1) 24 5(2) 12 6(2) 5 

‘CS 7S’ 5(1) 25 5(2) 12 6(2) 5 

‘CS 8S’ 7(2) 7 8(1) 11 8(4) 49 

‘DeltaEMERALD’ 10(4) 11 11(4) 22 12(3) 55 

‘DeltaGEM’ 9(4) 8 10(3) 17 11(2) 53 

‘DeltaJEWEL’ 10(4) 11 11(4) 22 12(3) 55 

‘DeltaOPAL’ 10(4) 11 11(4) 23 12(3) 55 

‘DeltaPEARL’ 9(4) 8 10(3) 18 12(1) 69 12(1) 74 

‘DP 5415’ syn Blanca 6(4) 8 8(2) 9 9(1) 35 12(4) 103 

145



Notice 

Surrendered/ 

Revoked/ 

Refused 

‘DP 5690’ syn Linda 6(4) 8 8(2) 11 9(1) 36 12(4) 103 

‘DP 891’ syn 

DPX 891 & DP 5891 5(3) 18 7(3) 13 8(2) 30 11(2) 56 

‘Rainbow-34’ 8(4) 5 9(3) 23 10(2) 55 9(4) 57 

‘Rainbow-39’ 8(3) 5 9(3) 24 10(2) 55 9(4) 57 

‘Sicala 34’ 5(1) 25 5(2) 13 6(2) 5 

‘Sicala 40’ 11(3) 10 12(3) 23 

‘Sicot 41’ 12(3) 10 

‘Sicala V-2’ 7(2) 7 8(1) 12 8(4) 49 

‘Sicala V-2i’ 9(3) 9 10(3) 18 11(2) 53 

‘Sicala V-2RR’ 12(1) 11 

‘Sicot 189’ 9(2) 6 9(2) 18 10(1) 47 

‘Sicot 189i’ 12(3) 10 

‘Sicot 189RR’ 12(1) 11 

‘Sicot 50i’ 9(3) 9 10(3) 19 11(2) 53 

‘Sicot 53’ 12(3) 10 

‘Sicot S-8i’ 9(3) 9 10(3) 19 11(2) 56 

‘Siokra L-23i’ 9(3) 9 10(3) 20 11(2) 53 

‘Siokra L23’ 5(1) 25 5(2) 13 6(2) 5 

‘Siokra S-101’ 9(2) 6 9(2) 19 10(1) 47 

‘Siokra V-15’ 7(2) 7 8(1) 13 8(4) 49 

‘Siokra V-15i’ 9(3) 9 10(3) 20 11(2) 53 

‘Siokra V-16’ 10(4) 11 11(2) 20 12(1) 69 

‘Siokra V-17’ 12(3) 10 

Grevillea 

hybrid 

‘Birdsong’ 12(3) 10 

‘Burke 1’ 12(3) 10 



‘Coastal Dawn’ 12(4) 11 

‘Coastal Sunset’ 12(4) 11 

‘Dot Brown’ 9(1) 5 9(3) 28 10(2) 56 

‘Golden Lyre’ 10(1) 9 11(1) 65 

‘Golden Yul Lo’ 8(1) 4 9(1) 18 9(4) 55 

‘Landcare’ syn 

Piccolo Pink 7(1) 7 9(2) 23 10(1) 47 

‘Sunkissed Waters’ 4(2) 23 4(2) 11 5(2) 6 

‘VJ 62’ 10(4) 11 11(3) 21 12(2) 68 

juniperina 

‘Allyn Radiance’ 9(1) 5 9(4) 31 11(1) 63 

longistyla x venusta 

‘Firesprite’ 10(3) 9 11(4) 55 

x variegata 

‘Honey Wonder’ 4(3) 26 4(4) 12 5(4) 5 9(3) 73 

robusta 

‘Silky Lace’ 10(4) 11 10(4) 64 11(4) 55 

‘VIC 97-11’ 10(4) 64 

Gypsophila 

paniculata 

‘Dangyhappy’ syn 

Happy Festival 9(2) 5 10(4) 25 11(3) 51 

‘Dangypmini’ 11(1) 8 11(4) 55 

‘Dagysha’ syn Yukinko 11(2) 12 

‘Festival’ syn 

Pink Festival 8(2) 3 10(4) 27 11(3) 51 

‘Magic Arbel’ 9(2) 5 10(4) 25 11(3) 51 

‘Magic Gilboa’ syn 

Gilboa 8(2) 3 10(4) 26 11(3) 51 

‘Magic Golan’ syn Golan 8(2) 3 10(4) 26 11(3) 51 

‘Magic Tavor’ 9(2) 5 10(4) 27 11(3) 51 

‘White Festival’ 8(2) 3 10(4) 27 11(3) 51 

146




Notice 

Surrendered/ 

Revoked/ 

Refused 

Hardenbergia 

violacea 

‘Bushy Blue’ 7(2) 9 7(4) 33 8(3) 52 9(3) 73 

‘Free ‘N’ Easy’ 6(1) 29 6(3) 20 7(2) 29 6(3) 46 

9(3) 73 

‘Mini Magic’ 8(3) 6 9(4) 57 

‘Mini-Haha’ 3(2) 34 3(2) 31 4(1) 4 

‘Pink Fizz’ 5(3) 20 5(4) 31 6(3) 6 8(4) 52 

‘Purple Falls’ 4(3) 26 5(1) 11 6(4) 52 9(2) 62 9(2) 63 

‘White Out’ 12(1) 11 

‘Winter White’ 10(2) 11 11(3) 54 

Hebe 

hybrid 

‘Gold Beauty’ 10(4) 11 12(3) 26 

‘Heebie Jeebies’ 12(2) 11 

‘Rosie’ 7(1) 5 11(1) 19 11(4) 51 

‘Southern Skies’ 12(4) 11 

‘Southern Sunrise’ 12(4) 11 

Hedysarum 

coronarium 

‘Necton’ 3(3) 26 3(3) 19 7(2) 28 9(1) 37 

Helianthus 

annuus 

‘Daniel’ 7(3) 5 9(2) 50 10(1) 49 9(3) 74 

Helipterum 

anthemoides 

‘Paper Cascade’ 4(2) 23 4(4) 8 5(3) 6 

‘Paper Star’ syn 

APS 91/B1 6(1) 27 6(4) 42 7(4) 41 

Heliotropium 

‘Atlanta’ 12(4) 11 

Hemerocallis 

hybrid 

‘Black Eyed Stella’ 9(3) 9 10(3) 56 

‘Lemon Baby’ syn 207-A 8(3) 6 9(4) 26 10(3) 53 11(3) 54 

‘Peach Baby’ syn 207-B 8(3) 6 9(4) 26 10(3) 53 

Heterocentron 

roseum 

‘Green Cascade’ syn 

Stargazer 4(4) 23 4(4) 20 5(3) 6 7(3) 49 

8(4) 52 

Hibiscus 

rosa-sinensis 

‘West Coast Jewel’ 9(1) 5 11(2) 22 12(3) 57 

‘West Coast Red’ 9(1) 5 11(2) 23 12(3) 57 

Homalomena 

‘Good As Gold’ 8(3) 6 10(3) 23 11(2) 53 9(3) 73 11(4) 55 

Hordeum 

vulgare 

‘Barque’ syn WI 2868 10(1) 8 11(1) 10 11(4) 51 11(3) 54 

‘Cask’ syn Ashton 4(3) 26 4(4) 12 6(1) 5 4(4) 23 12(4) 103 6(2) 35 

5(4) 35 

‘Chieftain’ syn 

1846-4139 8(2) 3 9(2) 13 10(1) 47 

‘Dash’ syn NFC 902/909 8(1) 3 9(2) 14 10(1) 47 

‘Doolup’ 11(4) 10 12(1) 23 12(4) 99 

147



Notice 

Surrendered/ 

Revoked/ 

Refused 

‘Dictator’ 10(2) 11 11(1) 12 11(4) 51 

‘Empress’ syn 90BE32 8(2) 3 9(2) 14 10(4) 61 12(4) 103 

‘Fitzgerald’ 10(2) 11 11(1) 12 12(1) 69 10(3) 57 

‘Franklin’ 2(2) 30 2(2) 22 3(1) 4 

‘Gairdner’ 10(2) 11 11(1) 14 12(1) 69 10(3) 57 

‘Keel’ 12(2) 10 

‘Lindwall’ 11(2) 12 

‘Molloy’ syn 

WABAR519 9(4) 8 10(1) 13 10(4) 61 

‘Monarch’† 

‘Morrell’ syn 82SN:513 6(4) 9 8(1) 10 8(4) 49 

9(4) 57 

7(2) 29 

‘Mundah’ 9(4) 8 11(1) 15 12(1) 69 

‘Osprey’ syn Galaxy 6(2) 31 7(3) 22 8(2) 30 

‘Picola’ syn 86045B 9(2) 5 10(2) 22 11(1) 62 10(2) 59 

‘Sloop’ 10(2) 11 11(1) 15 11(4) 51 

‘Unicorn’ syn 

Kinukei 21 10(4) 10 11(4) 14 12(3) 55 

‘Venture’ syn 

NFC 1243-11 8(1) 3 9(2) 15 10(1) 47 9(4) 57 

‘Wyalong’ 11(4) 10 12(1) 24 12(4) 99 

Hosta 

xtardiana 

‘June’ 10(4) 13 

Humulus 

lupulus 

‘Furano No.18’ 7(2) 8 12(1) 30 12(4) 99 8(3) 53 

‘Hokuto Ace’† 8(3) 53 

Hydrangea 

macrophylla 

‘Helen Rankin’ 6(2) 32 8(4) 51 

‘Hobella’ 9(1) 5 

‘Homigo’ syn HK901 11(3) 10 

‘Hopaline’ syn HK909 11(3) 10 

‘Kirsten’ syn HOR4 5(2) 36 5(3) 10 6(2) 4 8(4) 51 

‘LK49’ syn HOR5 5(3) 10 5(3) 10 6(2) 5 8(4) 51 

‘Messalina’ 5(3) 17 8(4) 51 

‘Rotenfels’ 5(3) 17 8(4) 51 

Hymenosporum 

flavum 

‘VIC 97-12’ 10(4) 12 12(1) 73 

Hypericum 

androsaemum 

‘Bosadua syn 10(3) 12 12(2) 61 

Dual Flair 

‘Bosakin’ syn 10(3) 12 12(2) 61 

King Flair 

‘Bosapin’ syn Pinky Flair 10(3) 12 12(2) 62 

‘Bosaque’ syn Queen Flair 10(4) 14 12(2) 63 

‘Bosasca’ syn 

Scarlet Flair 10(3) 12 12(2) 63 

‘Hippie’ 10(4) 14 12(2) 71 

Iberis 

gibraltarica 

‘Mount Hood Dusk’ 7(4) 6 10(1) 50 10(2) 60 

pruitii 

‘Candy Glow’ 

syn 89-105 5(1) 24 7(2) 29 

sempervirens 

‘White Cloud’ 5(3) 19 7(1) 33 

148




Notice 

Surrendered/ 

Revoked/ 

Refused 

Impatiens 

hawkeri 

‘Antigua’ syn Kitigua 5(2) 33 5(2) 33 6(1) 6 8(4) 51 11(1) 66 

‘Aruba’ syn Kiruba 5(2) 33 5(2) 33 6(1) 6 8(4) 51 11(1) 66 

‘Barbados’ syn Kibados 5(2) 30 5(2) 30 6(1) 6 8(4) 51 11(1) 66 

‘Bora Bora’ syn Kibora 5(2) 31 5(2) 31 6(1) 6 8(4) 51 11(1) 66 

‘Fiji’ syn Kiji 5(2) 32 5(2) 32 6(1) 6 8(4) 51 11(1) 66 

‘Isis’ syn Butterfly 

Impatiens 5(2) 25 5(2) 25 6(1) 6 8(4) 51 10(2) 60 

‘Lanai’ syn Kinai 5(2) 30 5(2) 30 6(1) 6 8(4) 51 11(1) 66 

‘Marpesia’ 5(2) 31 5(2) 31 6(1) 6 8(4) 51 

‘Maui’ syn Kima 5(2) 29 5(2) 29 6(1) 6 8(4) 51 11(1) 66 

‘Melissa’ syn Butterfly 

Impatiens 5(2) 27 5(2) 27 6(1) 6 8(4) 51 10(2) 60 

‘Octavia’ syn 

Butterfly Impatiens 5(2) 26 5(2) 26 6(1) 6 8(4) 51 

‘Papete’ syn 

Kipete Paradise 5(2) 28 5(2) 28 6(1) 6 8(4) 51 11(1) 66 5(3) 21 

‘Samoa’ syn Kimoa 5(2) 29 5(2) 29 6(1) 6 8(4) 51 10(2) 60 

‘Sphinx’ syn 

Butterfly Impatiens 5(2) 25 5(2) 25 6(1) 6 8(4) 51 11(1) 66 

‘Tahiti’ syn Kiti 5(2) 32 5(2) 32 6(1) 6 8(4) 51 

‘Tobago’ syn Kibago 5(2) 27 5(2) 27 6(1) 6 8(4) 51 10(2) 60 

‘Tonga’ syn Kinga 5(2) 27 5(2) 27 6(1) 6 8(4) 51 11(1) 66 

‘Trinidad’ syn Kinida 5(2) 28 5(2) 28 6(1) 6 8(4) 51 11(1) 66 

‘Yuletide’ syn 

No. 92/650 6(2) 33 9(2) 62 

hawkeri hybrid 

‘Anaea’ 4(1) 25 4(1) 13 4(4) 5 8(4) 51 10(4) 65 

‘Apollon’ 2(3) 23 2(4) 6 3(3) 5 8(4) 51 10(4) 65 

‘Arctia’ syn Aglia 2(3) 23 2(4) 20 3(3) 6 8(4) 51 10(4) 65 2(4) 39 

‘Argus’ 2(3) 23 2(4) 6 3(3) 5 8(4) 51 10(4) 65 

‘Aurore’ 2(3) 21 2(4) 6 3(3) 5 8(4) 51 7(3) 49 8(4) 52 

‘Celerio’ 2(3) 23 2(4) 8 3(3) 5 8(4) 51 10(4) 65 

‘Celsia’ 4(1) 25 4(1) 12 4(4) 5 8(4) 51 10(4) 65 

‘Delias’ 2(3) 23 2(4) 8 3(3) 5 8(4) 51 10(4) 65 

‘Dunya’ 4(1) 25 4(1) 13 4(4) 5 8(4) 51 10(4) 65 

‘Epia’ 2(3) 23 2(4) 8 3(3) 5 8(4) 51 10(4) 65 

‘Eurema’ 2(3) 23 2(4) 12 3(3) 5 8(4) 51 10(4) 65 

‘Flambee’ 2(3) 23 2(4) 12 3(3) 5 8(4) 51 10(4) 65 

‘Isopa’ 3(2) 34 3(2) 29 4(1) 4 8(4) 51 10(2) 60 

‘Jasius’ 2(3) 23 2(4) 12 3(3) 5 8(4) 51 10(4) 65 

‘Lysandra’ 3(2) 34 3(4) 19 4(4) 5 8(4) 51 10(4) 65 

‘Marumba’ 2(3) 23 2(4) 14 3(3) 5 8(4) 51 10(4) 65 

‘Mimas’ 2(3) 23 2(4) 14 3(3) 5 7(3) 49 8(4) 52 

‘Petula’ 3(2) 34 3(2) 30 4(1) 4 8(4) 51 10(2) 60 3(4) 38 

‘Phoebis’ 2(4) 39 2(4) 20 3(3) 6 7(3) 49 

‘Saturnia’ 2(3) 23 2(4) 14 3(3) 5 8(4) 51 10(4) 65 

‘Selenia’ 2(3) 23 2(4) 18 3(3) 5 8(4) 51 10(4) 65 

‘Sesia’ 

(1st Application) 2(3) 23 2(4) 38 

‘Sesia’ 

(2nd Application) 4(1) 25 4(1) 11 4(4) 5 10(4) 65 

‘Sylvine’ 2(4) 39 2(4) 20 3(3) 6 7(3) 49 8(4) 52 

‘Thecla’ 2(3) 23 2(4) 18 3(3) 5 7(3) 49 8(4) 52 

‘Vulcain’ 2(3) 23 2(4) 18 3(4) 4 8(4) 51 

hybrid 

‘Ambience’ 7(3) 9 10(3) 24 11(4) 51 

‘Ambrosia’ syn 

Lasting Impressions 5(4) 34 6(4) 31 7(4) 39 7(1) 33 

‘Antares’ syn 

Lasting Impressions 5(4) 34 6(4) 27 7(4) 39 7(1) 32 11(4) 55 

‘Blazon’ syn 


149



Notice 

Surrendered/ 

Revoked/ 

Refused 

‘BFP-368 Rose’ syn 

Rose Celebration 11(1) 8 12(2) 36 12(2) 70 

‘BFP-523 Deep Red’ syn 

Celebration Deep Red 11(1) 8 12(2) 34 12(2) 70 

‘BSR-152 Dark Pink’ syn 

Celebration Deep Pink 11(1) 8 12(2) 33 12(2) 70 

‘BSR-186 Bonfire Orange’ syn 

Celebration Orange Bonfire11(1) 8 12(2) 35 12(2) 70 

‘Celebration Candy Pink’ 7(3) 5 10(3) 25 11(2) 53 

‘Celebration Bright Coral’ 7(3) 5 8(3) 13 9(2) 60 11(2) 56 

‘Celebration Deep Pink’† 12(2) 70 

‘Celebration Deep Red’† 

‘Celebration Hot Pink’ 7(3) 5 8(3) 14 9(2) 60 


11(2) 56 

‘Celebration Cherry Star’ 7(3) 5 8(3) 13 9(2) 60 11(2) 56 

‘Celebration 

Lightlavender’ 7(3) 5 8(3) 53 

‘Celebration 

Orange Bonfire’† 

‘Celebration Pure White’ syn 


BSR-203 7(3) 5 8(3) 14 9(2) 60 

‘Celebration Purple Star’† 

‘Celebration Salmon’ syn 


BSR-195 7(3) 5 8(3) 15 9(2) 60 11(2) 56 

‘Charade’ syn 


‘Danigoldy’ syn 

Goldy Gini 11(3) 10 12(2) 71 

‘Danilily’ syn Lily Gini 11(3) 10 12(2) 71 

‘Daniwiny’ syn 

Winy Gini 11(3) 10 12(2) 71 

‘Micky Gini’ syn GN5 11(3) 10 12(2) 71 

‘Pinki Gini’ syn GN1 11(3) 11 12(2) 71 

‘Ricky Gini’ syn GN4 11(3) 11 12(2) 71 

‘Debbie’ 

(1st Application) 8(1) 4 

‘Debbie’ 

(2nd Application) 8(1) 4 9(4) 57 

‘Heathermist’ syn 


‘Illusion’ syn 


‘Innocence’ syn 


‘Kallima’ 12(2) 13 

‘Kiala’ syn Moala 12(2) 13 

‘Kibon’ syn Bonaire 11(2) 13 

‘Kigre’ syn Grenada 11(2) 13 

‘Kigula’ syn Tagula 12(2) 13 

‘Kilyci’ syn Lycia 12(2) 12 12(4) 

‘Kimoo’ syn Moorea 11(2) 13 

‘Kimpgua’ 12(2) 13 

‘Kimps’ syn Samoa Pearl 11(2) 13 

‘Kincoc’ syn Noctua 12(2) 13 

‘Kinep’ syn Neptis 12(2) 13 

‘Kipag’ syn Pago Pago 11(2) 13 

‘Kipas’ syn Pascua 12(2) 13 

‘Kirawa’ syn Tarawa 12(2) 13 

‘Kispix’ syn Spixis 12(2) 13 

‘Kitim’ syn Timor 11(2) 13 

‘Kitoga’ syn Toga 12(2) 13 

‘Kiwoya’ syn Woya 12(2) 13 

‘Kixant’ syn Xanthia 12(2) 13 

150




Notice 

Surrendered/ 

Revoked/ 

Refused 

‘Nebulous’ syn 


‘Radiance’ syn 


‘Rosetta’ syn 


‘Rose Celebration’† 

‘Prepona’ 11(2) 13 


‘Purple Star’ syn 

Celebration Purple Star 11(1) 8 12(2) 36 12(2) 70 

‘Shadow’ 7(3) 9 10(3) 25 11(4) 51 

‘Tempest’ 7(3) 9 10(3) 25 11(4) 51 

wallerana 

‘Becky’ 7(4) 5 9(1) 37 

‘Burgundy Rose’ syn 

‘Codiampca’ 12(4) 

‘Fiesta Burgundy Rose 8(1) 4 9(3) 29 10(2) 56 10(2) 59 

‘Golden Anniversary’ 7(1) 8 9(2) 25 10(1) 47 11(2) 56 

‘Golden Girl’ 6(2) 32 9(2) 25 10(1) 48 

‘Golden Surprise’ 7(1) 8 7(3) 42 9(2) 60 

‘Laser Purple Flare’ 10(2) 12 10(3) 56 

‘Laser Red Flash’ 10(2) 12 10(3) 56 

‘Lavender Orchid’ syn Fiesta 

Lavender orchid double 11(1) 8 12(2) 29 12(2) 70 

‘Leah’ 8(1) 4 10(3) 56 

‘Pink Ruffle’ syn Fiesta 

Pink Ruffle 11(1) 8 12(2) 30 12(2) 70 

‘Rebecca’ 8(1) 4 10(3) 56 

‘Salmon Sunrise’ syn 

Fiesta Salmon Sunrise 8(1) 4 

‘Fiesta Lavender Orchid 

Double’† 12(2) 70 

‘Fiesta Pink Ruffle’† 

‘Fiesta Salmon Sunrise’ 8(1) 4 9(3) 29 10(2) 56 


10(2) 59 

‘Salsa Red’ syn Fiesta 

Salsa Red 8(1) 4 9(3) 30 10(2) 56 10(2) 59 

‘Fiesta Sparkler Rose 

Double’† 

‘Sparkler Rose’ syn Fiesta 


Sparkler Rose Double 11(1) 8 12(2) 30 12(2) 70 

‘Sparkler Salmon’ syn 

Fiesta Sparkler Salmon 8(1) 4 9(3) 30 10(2) 56 10(2) 59 

‘Tropical Orange’ syn 

Fiesta Tropical Orange 8(1) 4 9(3) 31 10(2) 56 10(2) 59 

‘Fiesta White’ 11(1) 8 12(2) 31 

Isopogon 

anemonifolius 

‘Woorikee 2000’ 9(3) 9 9(3) 23 10(4) 61 

Isotoma 

axillaris 

‘Sapphire Star’ 10(4) 12 11(4) 25 12(3) 55 

hybrid 

‘Sapphire Star Pink’ 10(4) 12 11(4) 55 

Jasminum 

polyanthum 

‘Gentle Giant’ 12(2) 12 

Juniperus 

conferta 

‘Aussie Green N Gold’ 9(2) 9 11(1) 43 11(4) 53 

‘No. 001’ 10(1) 10 11(1) 44 11(4) 53 

151



Notice 

Surrendered/ 

Revoked/ 

Refused 

horizontalis 

‘Monber Icee Blue’ syn 

Icee Blue 12(3) 10 

scopularum 

‘Blue Arrow’ 6(1) 29 9(3) 31 10(2) 56 

Kalanchoe 

blossfeldiana 

‘Blues’ 3(2) 34 4(1) 7 5(1) 7 8(4) 51 9(1) 37 3(3) 26 

‘Mazurka’ 3(2) 34 4(1) 7 5(1) 7 8(4) 51 10(2) 60 3(3) 26 

‘Polka’ 3(2) 34 6(4) 54 3(3) 26 

‘Tarantella’ 3(2) 34 6(4) 54 3(3) 26 

hybrid 

‘Elves Bells’ 10(4) 12 12(3) 26 

Koeleria 

cristata 

‘Barkoel’ 7(1) 7 8(1) 13 8(4) 49 

Kunzea 

pomifera 

‘Rivoli Bay’ 9(2) 7 

Lablab 

purpureus 

‘Endurance’ 11(2) 14 11(4) 26 12(3) 55 12(3) 57 

‘Endurance’ syn Longlife† 

‘Koala’ syn Q6880 8(1) 4 9(1) 19 9(4) 55 


Lactuca 

sativa 

‘45-70 RZ’† 11(2) 56 

‘83-95 RZ’† 

‘85-53 RZ’ syn 10(4) 12 11(2)24 12(1) 70 

11(2) 56 

11(2) 56 

Concorde RZ 

‘Bronco’ syn A15 7(3) 6 

‘Bulls Eye’ syn Chifley 1(4) 5 2(3) 4 2(1) 15 8(3) 53 

‘Diamond’ 7(1) 5 7(4) 28 9(1) 36 

‘Frillice’ syn RS-892108 6(4) 8 9(4) 57 

‘Greenway’ 3(1) 37 3(1) 7 3(4) 4 11(4) 56 

‘Iglo’ syn 45-75 RZ 8(4) 6 11(2) 24 12(1) 70 

‘Impact’ syn 

J6N, PSR301 5(1) 23 5(1) 23 6(1) 7 10(1) 50 

‘Kendai’ syn 83-95 RZ 10(4) 12 11(2) 25 12(1) 70 11(2) 56 

‘Kristine’ syn 83-37 RZ 8(4) 6 10(2) 37 11(1) 63 

‘Magnum’ syn 

MR7, PSR 2018 5(2) 24 5(2) 24 6(3) 6 11(2) 56 

‘Marksman’ 7(4) 6 7(4) 37 8(3) 52 11(3) 54 

‘Mustang’ syn R-83 7(3) 6 

‘Remus’ syn 41-20 RZ 8(4) 6 11(2) 25 12(1) 70 

‘Rodeo’ syn SPS 671 6(4) 8 7(2) 29 

‘Rubette’ syn 45-70 RZ 10(4) 12 11(2) 26 12(1) 70 11(2) 56 

‘Target’ 1(3) 13 1(4) 6 2(3) 4 11(4) 56 

‘Wintersalad’ 1(3) 13 3(1) 7 5(2) 5 9(1) 37 

Lantana 

montevidensis 

‘Malans Gold’ 7(4) 5 9(2) 26 10(1) 48 11(1) 66 

‘Rosie’ 6(3) 45 11(2) 56 

sellowiana 

‘Monswee’ syn 

Lavender Swirl 5(2) 35 7(1) 10 8(3) 52 7(2) 29 

8(3) 53 

Lathyrus 

‘Lath-BC’ 8(4) 6 12(3) 57 

‘Canopus’ syn IFLA1279 11(1) 65 

152




Notice 

Surrendered/ 

Revoked/ 

Refused 

Lavandula 

angustifolia 

‘Avice Hill’ syn 

Impression 11(2) 14 

dentata 

‘Pure Harmony’ 10(2) 12 11(3) 21 12(2) 68 

hybrid 

‘Henri Dunant’ 6(3) 46 8(3) 21 9(2) 61 

‘Schola’ syn 

Blue Cushion 10(1) 9 

‘Sidonie’ 6(4) 7 8(2) 14 9(3) 71 9(3) 74 

‘Silver Feather’ 10(1) 10 11(4) 31 

pedunculata 

‘Willowbridge Wings’ 11(2) 13 12(4) 46 11(2) 56 

‘Willowbridge White’ 8(3) 6 10(1) 18 10(4) 62 

‘Willowbridge Snow’ 10(4) 12 11(4) 55 11(2) 56 

pinnata 

‘White Lace’ syn 

O’malley 7(3) 6 10(3) 56 

11(4) 55 

stoechas 

‘Bee Bright’ 12(4) 11 

‘Bee Brilliant’ 12(4) 11 

‘Bee Cool’ 12(4) 11 

‘Bee Dazzle’ 10(3) 9 11(4) 28 12(3) 55 

‘Bee Happy’ 12(4) 11 

‘Bella Bambina’ 10(3) 9 11(4) 29 12(3) 55 

‘Bella Mauve’ 12(4) 11 

‘Bella Pink’ 12(4) 11 

‘Bella Purple’ 12(4) 11 

‘Bella White’ 12(4) 11 

‘Darling Crown’ 9(1) 6 12(4) 45 11(4) 

‘Helmsdale’ 7(1) 5 9(1) 19 9(4) 55 

‘Magenta Aurora’ syn 

Swan River Pink 8(4) 6 10(1) 17 10(4) 62 10(1) 50 

‘Marshwood’ 7(1) 5 9(1) 19 9(4) 55 

stoechas ssp pedunculata 

‘Pukehou’ 9(3) 10 12(2) 32 

stoechas ssp luisieri 

‘Lavenite No.1’† 

‘Tickled Pink’ 11(3) 11 11(4) 30 



xallardii 

‘Majella’ 10(2) 12 11(3) 54 

Lechenaultia 

biloba 

‘Autumn Blue’ 2(3) 21 4(1) 5 4(4) 5 8(1) 39 4(2) 24 

5(1) 26 

8(4) 52 

formosa 

‘Fantail Starburst’† 

‘Flamingo’ syn 

2(2) 31 

Fantail Flamingo 1(4) 23 1(4) 13 2(3) 4 2(2) 31 7(3) 49 

‘Starburst’ 1(4) 23 1(4) 13 2(3) 4 2(2) 31 7(3) 49 

hybrid 

‘Fantail Ultraviolet’† 

‘Ultraviolet’ 1(4) 23 1(4) 13 2(3) 4 

2(2) 31 

2(2) 31 7(3) 49 

Lens 

culinaris 

‘Cassab’ syn Ill 7200 10(3) 9 11(1) 65 

‘Cumra’ syn LEN29610 10(3) 9 11(1) 65 

‘Northfield’ syn Ill 5588 8(1) 4 10(4) 30 

153



Notice 

Surrendered/ 

Revoked/ 

Refused 

Leptospermum 

hybrid 

‘Bywong Merinda’ 9(3) 12 10(1) 40 10(4) 63 

‘Dreamtime 12(4) 14 

‘Love Affair’ 12(4) 14 

‘Outrageous’ 12(4) 14 

‘Pageant’ 12(4) 15 

‘Rudolph’ 10(4) 15 12(4) 88 

‘White Wave’ 12(4) 15 

laevigatum 

‘Beach Baby’ 11(4) 12 

liversidgei 

‘BY11’ 10(4) 15 12(1) 58 

rotundifolium x spectabile 

‘Rhiannon’ 7(3) 7 8(1) 35 8(4) 49 

scoparium 

‘Freya’ 10(4) 15 11(4) 46 12(3) 56 

spectabile hybrid 

‘Aphrodite’ 5(3) 18 6(1) 26 6(4) 53 

Leucadendron 

hybrid 

‘Katie’s Blush’ 3(3) 26 4(1) 8 5(1) 7 7(3) 48 4(2) 23 

gandogerii x spissifolium 

‘Corringle Gold’ 12(1) 12 

‘Our Vision’ 7(1) 7 11(4) 31 12(3) 55 10(3) 56 10(3) 57 

8(1) 4 

‘World Vision’† 10(3) 56 

Leucaena 

leucocephala 

‘Tarramba’ syn K636 8(3) 6 10(1) 19 10(4) 62 

Leucospermum 

condifloium x patersonii 

‘High Gold’ 7(4) 7 10(4) 38 

erubescens x cuniforme 

‘Marmalade’ 11(4) 11 

Ligustrum 

undulatum 

‘Lemon Lime and 

Clippers’ 9(4) 9 10(4) 34 11(3) 52 10(3) 57 

Lilium 

hybrid 

‘Acapulco’ 9(2) 7 12(1) 73 

‘Arena’ 9(2) 7 12(1) 73 12(4) 102 

‘Barbaresco’ 9(3) 10 12(1) 73 

‘Bergamo’ 9(3) 10 12(1) 73 12(4) 102 

‘Bernini’ 9(3) 10 12(1) 73 

‘Colonna’ 9(3) 10 12(1) 73 12(4) 102 

‘Galilei’ 9(3) 10 12(1) 73 12(4) 102 

‘Hoffrica Blue Eyes’ 11(2) 14 

‘Lombardia’ 9(3) 10 12(1) 73 

‘Miami’ 9(3) 10 

‘Mona Lisa’ 2(3) 23 4(4) 5 5(4) 5 9(3) 74 

‘Nippon’ 9(2) 7 12(1) 73 12(4) 102 

‘Our Medusa’ 9(3) 10 12(1) 73 

‘Rosato’ 9(3) 10 12(1) 73 12(4) 102 

‘Sartre’ 9(3) 10 12(1) 73 12(4) 102 

‘Siberia’ 8(1) 4 12(1) 33 12(4) 99 

‘Simplon’ 9(3) 10 12(1) 73 

‘Sorbonne’ 9(3) 10 12(1) 73 

‘Spinoza’ 9(3) 10 12(1) 73 12(4) 102 

154




Notice 

Surrendered/ 

Revoked/ 

Refused 

‘Tiber’ 9(3) 10 12(1) 73 

‘Topsy’ 12(3) 11 

‘Venezia’ 2(3) 23 4(2) 4 5(2) 5 8(1) 39 8(4) 52 

‘Woodriff’s Memory’ 9(3) 10 12(1) 73 

sp 

‘Geneve’ 2(3) 23 3(1) 36 

‘Grand Cru’ 2(3) 23 3(1) 36 

‘Lucca’ 2(3) 23 3(1) 36 

‘Menton’ 2(3) 23 3(1) 36 

‘Monte Rosa’ 2(3) 23 3(1) 36 

‘Sancerre’ 2(3) 23 3(1) 36 

‘Toscane’ 2(3) 23 3(1) 36 

Limonium 

altaica 

‘Emille’ 4(2) 23 6(4) 10 7(4) 39 10(4) 65 

‘Pink Emille’ 5(4) 33 6(4) 23 7(4) 40 10(4) 65 

‘Tall Emille’ 7(3) 8 9(3) 34 10(2) 56 

caspium x latifolium 

‘Beltlaard’ 4(2) 23 6(4) 11 7(4) 39 10(4) 65 

hybrid 

‘Daicean’ syn 

Ocean Blue 5(3) 17 6(4) 20 7(4) 40 

‘Misty White’† 

‘Oceanic Blue’ 5(3) 17 6(4) 20 7(4) 41 

10(1) 50 

‘Oceanic White’ 5(3) 17 10(4) 31 11(3) 53 10(1) 50 

‘Saint Pierre’ 4(2) 23 7(2) 29 

perezii 

‘Cosita’ 10(4) 14 12(1) 32 12(4) 101 

peregrinum 

‘Ballerina Rose’ 3(2) 34 7(3) 9 8(3) 52 10(2) 60 11(2) 56 

sinuatum 

‘Crystal Yellow’ 5(4) 33 7(3) 49 

‘La Mer’ 5(4) 33 7(3) 49 

‘Lavender Emille’ 5(4) 33 7(3) 49 

‘Sunday Light Blue’ 5(4) 33 7(3) 49 

‘Sunday Pink’ 5(4) 33 7(3) 49 

Linum 

usitatissimum 

‘ARZY8*11-1-2’ syn 

Argyle 9(1) 6 9(4) 57 

‘Eyre’ syn 

GLZY8*17-258 4(4) 23 5(4) 14 6(4) 53 

‘Wallaga’ syn 

CRZY8*2-15 4(4) 23 5(4) 13 6(4) 53 

Lithodora 

diffusa 

‘The Star’ 10(4) 12 11(4) 32 

Lobelia 

erinus 

‘True Blue’ 8(1) 5 8(2) 14 9(1) 36 9(1) 37 

Lolium 

hybrid 

‘Grasslands Impact’ syn 

G 47 9(1) 7 9(3) 28 11(2) 54 

‘Maverick Gold’ syn 

CSLh931 8(3) 7 9(2) 24 10(1) 47 

multiflorum 

‘Conker’ syn 

CSLM91-101 7(1) 9 8(3) 53 

155



Notice 

Surrendered/ 

Revoked/ 

Refused 

‘Cordura’ syn 

CSLM 90-103 6(2) 31 7(3) 21 8(4) 49 

‘Dargle’ syn LMD/90 10(1) 9 

‘Dargo’ 9(1) 5 9(4) 31 11(3) 52 

‘Eclipse’ syn PG61 6(4) 6 6(4) 51 7(4) 41 

‘Flanker’ 8(4) 5 9(3) 16 10(2) 56 9(3) 73 

11(1) 66 

‘LM71’† 

‘Mariner’ 8(4) 5 9(3) 17 11(1) 63 

10(2) 59 

9(3) 73 

11(1) 65 

10(2) 59 

‘Noble’ 6(3) 44 6(3) 40 8(2) 30 

‘Progrow’ 1(3) 13 1(4) 7 2(4) 5 

‘Robust’ 9(1) 5 

‘Tabu’ 12(1) 10 

perenne 

‘Amaroo’ 10(4) 13 12(3) 57 

‘Arena’ 12(3) 11 

‘Aries HD’ syn 

CSLP90-102 9(1) 6 10(2) 40 

‘Avalon’ 10(4) 13 12(1) 43 12(4) 101 12(4) 103 

‘Banks’ 5(3) 20 7(3) 14 8(4) 50 6(2) 34 

‘Boomer’ syn VPR/89/01 5(4) 32 6(3) 14 7(2) 29 

‘Bronsyn’ 8(4) 7 9(3) 40 10(2) 57 9(3) 73 9(4) 57 

11(1) 66 

‘Camel’ 8(3) 7 10(1) 30 10(4) 63 

‘Checkmate’ 12(3) 11 

‘Cobber’ 7(1) 9 10(2) 43 11(4) 52 8(4) 51 

11(1) 65 

‘CSLP92-109’† 

‘Dobson’ syn LP15 6(2) 31 7(3) 20 8(4) 50 

11(1) 65 

11(1) 66 

‘Embassy’ 4(2) 23 7(3) 10 8(4) 50 

‘Fitzroy’ 10(3) 10 12(1) 40 12(3) 58 

‘Grasslands Lincoln’ 

syn G28 5(2) 35 6(3) 11 7(3) 48 7(3) 48 

‘Grasslands Pacific’† 

‘Grasslands Samson’ 9(1) 6 9(3) 40 11(2) 54 

7(3) 48 

‘Jackaroo’ 4(1) 25 5(1) 9 6(1) 7 5(2) 36 

‘Jamborina’ 9(3) 11 10(1) 30 10(4) 63 

‘Hilltop’ 11(4) 

‘LP 147’† 10(1) 10 11(2) 55 

‘LP22’† 9(3) 73 

‘LP37’† 

‘Meridian’ 10(1) 10 11(3) 35 12(2) 69 

9(3) 73 

11(1) 65 

11(2) 55 

‘Nevis’ 8(4) 7 9(3) 43 10(2) 57 9(3) 73 

11(1) 66 

‘Outback’ 9(3) 11 

‘Prolong’ 9(3) 11 10(1) 30 11(1) 64 

‘Quartet’ 11(4) 11 

‘Resurrection’ 11(4) 11 

‘Roper’ 3(2) 34 6(2) 7 8(1) 38 3(3) 26 

‘Vedette’ syn LP11 5(3) 19 6(4) 21 7(4) 40 11(1) 66 

‘Victoca’ 9(2) 7 11(3) 36 12(2) 69 12(1) 73 

‘Yatsyn 1’ 1(3) 13 1(3) 5 2(2) 4 11(1) 66 

perenne x multiflorum 

‘Grasslands Greenstone’ 3(4) 38 3(4) 20 5(1) 6 

rigidum 

‘Guard’ syn 236 5(3) 20 7(2) 16 8(4) 49 

Lomandra 

longifolia 

‘Cassica’ 10(3) 10 

‘Green ‘N’ Gold’ 8(3) 53 

‘Katrinus’ 10(3) 10 

‘Limeglow’ 7(3) 9 8(4) 51 

156



spicata 

‘Joey’ 12(2) 12 


Notice 

Surrendered/ 

Revoked/ 

Refused 

Lonicera 

nitida 

‘Little Nikki’ 12(2) 11 12(3) 58 

‘Paradise Royal Flush’ 11(4) 10 12(4) 23 

Lophostemon 

confertus 

‘Billy Bunter’ 6(4) 5 9(3) 34 10(2) 56 9(2) 62 

Lotus 

corniculatus 

‘Grasslands Goldie’syn 

G32 5(3) 20 6(2) 24 7(3) 48 

hybrid 

‘Merlins Gold’ 

(2nd application) 11(1) 8 12(1) 73 

maculatus x berthelotii 

‘Merlin’s Gold’ 

(1st application) 6(1) 31 9(1) 37 

pedunculatus 

‘Sharnae’ 6(4) 5 7(2) 23 8(1) 38 12(1) 73 

Lupinus 

albus 

‘Lucyanne’ 12(2) 15 

‘Lago Azzurro’ 8(2) 6 10(1) 19 


‘Ludet’ 10(2) 14 12(1) 65 12(4) 100 

‘Magna’ 11(4) 12 12(1) 67 12(4) 100 

‘Minibean’ 11(4) 12 12(1) 67 12(4) 100 

angustifolius 

‘83A:455’† 

‘Belara’ 10(2) 12 11(1) 21 11(4) 52 

9(4) 57 


‘Boongul’† 

‘Kalya’ syn WALUP0460 9(4) 9 10(1) 22 10(4) 62 

9(2) 62 

‘Mason’ 10(3) 10 11(2)28 12(1) 70 

‘Moonah’ syn 

84S017-26 11(3) 11 12(1) 36 12(4) 

‘Myallie’ syn 84l:439 9(4) 9 11(1) 21 11(4) 52 

‘Quilinock’ 12(4) 12 

‘Tallerack’ 10(2) 12 11(1) 22 11(4) 52 12(1) 72 

‘Tanjil’ syn 

WALAN0497 11(3) 11 12(1) 37 12(4) 

‘Wonga’ 9(1) 6 9(4) 32 10(3) 54 9(2) 62 10(2) 60 

9(4) 57 

10(3) 56 

luteus 

‘Wodjil’ 10(2) 15 11(1) 55 11(4) 54 12(1) 72 

Lycopersicon 

esculentum 

‘Alka’ 7(3) 9 12(1) 73 

‘Rollande’ 10(3) 12 12(2) 71 

Lysimachia 

congestiflora 

‘Golden Harvest’ 6(3) 45 10(4) 33 11(3) 52 

‘Outback Sunset’ 6(2) 32 8(2) 15 9(1) 36 

‘Silverbird’ syn 

Silbervogel 5(3) 19 8(2) 16 9(1) 36 7(2) 29 10(1) 50 

‘Sunbird’† 7(2) 29 

157



Notice 

Surrendered/ 

Revoked/ 

Refused 

Macadamia 

integrifolia 

‘Hidden Valley A16’ 1(2) 14 1(2) 9 2(1) 4 

‘Hidden Valley A4’ 1(2) 14 1(2) 7 2(1) 4 

integrifolia x tetraphylal 

‘Hidden Valley A38’ 

syn A38 6(1) 28 7(4) 21 8(3) 52 

Macroptilium 

atropurpureum 

‘Aztec’ 7(1) 7 7(2) 27 8(1) 38 

Magnolia 

hybrid 

‘Vulcan’ 5(4) 34 9(3) 36 10(2) 57 

Malus 

domestica 

‘Baigent’ 10(2) 11 

‘Belmont Red’ 8(3) 4 9(3) 74 

‘Big Time’ 3(3) 26 4(4) 6 6(1) 7 5(1) 26 

‘Casey’s Red’ 11(3) 54 

‘Cepiland’ 2(3) 23 12(2) 22 

‘Charlotte’ 12(1) 10 12(1) 21 12(4) 99 

‘Coop 23’ syn 

Williams’ Pride 8(4) 5 10(4) 18 11(3) 51 12(3) 57 9(2) 63 

‘Delblush’ 10(2) 11 11(2) 17 12(2) 68 

‘Delkistar’ 10(3) 9 

‘Early Pink Lady’† 

‘Elshof’ 8(2) 2 

7(2) 29 

9(3) 74 

‘Galaxy’ 7(1) 9 8(2) 6 9(2) 60 

‘Gb 63-43’ 5(3) 19 6(2) 15 7(4) 40 6(3) 46 

‘Gb 125-8’ 12(1) 10 

‘Ginger Gold’ syn 

Mountain Cove 8(4) 5 

‘Gold Lady’ 8(3) 4 11(2) 56 

‘Honeycrisp’ syn MN 1711 8(2) 2 

‘Huaguan’ 10(2) 10 

‘Huashuai’ 10(2) 10 

‘Joburn’ 12(3) 10 

‘Jonagored’ syn 

Morren’s Jonagored 2(2) 30 9(2) 10 10(1) 47 

‘Lancep’ 2(3) 23 12(2) 23 12(3) 57 

‘Lochbuie Red Braeburn’ 10(2) 11 

‘Merlyn’ 7(2) 5 

‘Pink Aurora’ syn 

Mason 988.328 10(4) 10 

‘Mariri Red’ 12(2) 10 

‘Obelisk’ syn Flamenco 12(1) 10 12(1) 22 12(4) 99 

‘Pink Rose’ 6(3) 44 8(1) 9 10(3) 52 7(2) 29 

‘Rafzubin’ 1(4) 23 10(2) 20 11(1) 62 9(3) 73 

‘Red Elstar’ 2(1) 15 10(3) 13 11(2) 52 

‘SA 244-20’ syn Maypole6(2) 33 9(2) 11 10(1) 47 

‘SA 251-18’ syn Waltz 6(2) 33 9(2) 11 10(1) 47 6(3) 46 

‘SA 252-107’ syn Polka 6(2) 33 10(4) 18 11(3) 51 6(3) 46 

‘SA 256-24’ syn Bolero 6(2) 33 10(4) 18 11(3) 51 6(3) 46 

‘Sandidge’ syn Super Chief 8(2) 2 11(3) 13 11(3) 54 

‘Sciearly’ 12(2) 10 

‘Sciglo’ syn Southern Snap† 

‘Sciglo’ 10(2) 10 12(2) 21 



‘Scired’ 12(2) 10 

‘Sciros’ 10(2) 10 12(2) 21 

‘Southern Star’ 4(2) 23 6(1) 31 

‘Summertime’ syn AG-E-937(2) 7 8(2) 7 9(2) 60 11(2) 56 

‘Sun Lady’ syn 

Price Spur Sun Lady 6(3) 44 7(1) 33 

158




Notice 

Surrendered/ 

Revoked/ 

Refused 

‘Telamon’† 

‘Tigress’ 9(2) 5 

6(3) 46 

‘Trajan’† 6(3) 46 

‘Tuscan’† 6(3) 46 

Mandevilla 

sanderi 

‘Cinderella’ 6(4) 5 9(1) 13 9(4) 55 9(3) 73 

‘Guinevere’ 11(3) 10 12(4) 47 

‘Merlin’s Magic’ 9(1) 5 9(1) 13 9(4) 55 9(3) 73 

‘My Fair Lady’ 5(1) 21 5(1) 21 6(1) 5 9(3) 73 8(1) 39 

‘Pale Face’ 7(4) 7 

8(1) 5 9(2) 23 10(1) 47 

‘Scarlet Pimpernel’ 3(2) 34 3(2) 12 4(1) 4 

‘Wilma’ 10(2) 12 12(3) 57 

x amabilis 

‘Beauty Queen’ 9(1) 5 9(2) 21 10(1) 47 

‘Blushing Queen’ 11(2) 14 11(3) 23 12(2) 68 

‘Magic Dream’ 8(4) 6 9(2) 22 10(1) 47 

‘Red Fantasy’ 11(2) 14 11(3) 23 12(2) 68 

‘Ruby Star’ 9(2) 6 10(1) 20 10(4) 61 

‘White Delite’ 9(2) 6 10(1) 20 10(4) 61 

Mangifera 

indica 

‘B74’ 11(1) 8 12(4) 103 

‘Celebration’ 10(1) 10 11(1) 23 11(4) 52 

‘Honey Gold’ 9(1) 6 12(1) 35 12(4) 100 

‘Kensington Red’ 8(2) 4 11(1) 25 11(4) 52 8(4) 51 

‘Red 1’ 11(2) 14 

‘TPP 1’ 10(1) 10 11(3) 24 12(2) 68 

Medicago 

littoralis 

‘Herald’ syn Z-245 7(4) 7 9(2) 49 10(1) 49 

sativa 

‘5454’ syn L34.HQ 6(2) 34 8(4) 43 9(3) 71 

‘58N57’ syn L90 11(4) 55 

‘Aquarius’ syn Y8408 6(4) 9 9(3) 35 10(2) 57 

‘Encore’† 

‘Eureka’ 7(3) 5 10(3) 26 11(2) 53 

9(2) 62 

10(4) 65 

‘Flairdale’ 7(2) 7 10(2) 37 11(1) 64 

‘Genesis’ syn Y8506 9(2) 7 9(3) 36 10(4) 64 

‘Grasslands Crusader’† 11(4) 55 


‘Grasslands Kaituna’ 

syn B 80 9(2) 7 11(4) 35 12(4) 99 

‘Grasslands Torlesse’ 9(2) 7 11(4) 32 12(4) 102 

‘Hallmark’ 9(4) 9 11(2) 27 12(2) 68 11(2) 56 

‘Jindera’ 7(3) 5 10(3) 27 11(2) 53 

‘L69’ syn 5715 5(2) 36 7(3) 11 8(2) 30 

‘Stirling’† 12(4) 102 

‘Pioneer 5939’† 

‘Pioneer 58N57’ syn 

11(2) 14 11(4) 55 

Pioneer L90† 

‘Pioneer 5681’ syn 

11(2) 14 11(4) 55 

Pioneer L55† 

‘PR 5681’ 

11(2) 14 11(4) 55 

11(4) 55 

‘PR 5939’ 11(4) 55 

‘Prime’ 4(1) 25 4(1) 18 5(2) 5 

‘Quadrella’ 3(2) 34 3(3) 18 4(2) 4 

‘Rapide’ 10(4) 12 

‘Salado’ 11(3) 11 

‘Sceptre’ syn L96 5(3) 20 8(1) 16 10(2) 57 

159



Notice 

Surrendered/ 

Revoked/ 

Refused 

‘Sequel HR’ syn CS 93-1 8(3) 6 10(4) 31 11(3) 52 9(2) 62 

9(4) 57 

11(1) 66 

‘Stirling’ 12(2) 12 

‘Super 7’ 12(4) 12 

‘UQL-1’ 12(2) 12 12(4) 102 

‘Venus’ 12(4) 12 

‘WL 414’ 12(1) 12 

sphaerocarpos 

‘Orion’ 7(2) 7 

tornata 

‘Rivoli’ 4(2) 23 4(4) 9 5(4) 5 

truncatula 

‘Caliph’ syn Z-602 5(3) 18 6(1) 26 6(4) 53 5(4) 35 

‘Jester’ 11(4) 10 

‘Mogul’ 5(2) 35 6(1) 23 7(1) 32 

Melaleuca 

incana 

‘Lemon, Lime & Dry’ 6(1) 28 11(3) 54 

linariifolia 

‘Phytogen’ 7(1) 7 8(4) 51 

Melia 

azederach 

‘Lady Gwenda’ 10(2) 14 12(1) 64 

Mentha 

diemenica 

‘Kosciusko’ 9(2) 9 

Metrosideros 

excelsa 

‘Midas’ 3(4) 38 5(3) 5 5(4) 35 

7(3) 49 

tomentosa 

‘Dalese’ 8(4) 6 10(4) 34 11(3) 52 10(4) 65 

umbellata 

‘Harlequin’ 10(4) 14 11(4) 44 12(2) 70 

‘YV Harlequin’† 12(2) 70 

Microcitrus 

australasica 

‘Pot Of Gold’ syn D1 10(1) 50 

australasica var. sanguine 

‘Rainforest Pearl’ syn T1 10(1) 10 11(4) 55 

‘Rainforest Pink Pearl’ 

syn T1† 10(4) 64 

11(4) 55 

‘Rose Gem’ 10(4) 64 

hybrid 

‘Australian Blood’ 10(1) 9 

‘Australian Sunrise’ 10(1) 9 

Microlaena 

stipoides 

‘Flinders’ 8(2) 6 

‘Griffin’ (3) 6 9(1) 37 8(2) 31 

(1st application) 

‘Griffin’ 

(2nd application) 8(1) 5 8(1) 27 8(4) 49 

‘Shannon’ syn 

17.2.6.5.12 7(3) 6 8(1) 27 9(1) 36 9(1) 37 

160




Notice 

Surrendered/ 

Revoked/ 

Refused 

‘Wakefield’ syn 

39.1.8.2.5 7(3) 6 8(1) 28 9(1) 36 9(1) 37 

Murraya 

paniculata var ovatifoliata 

‘Min-A-Min’ 11(2) 14 11(3) 27 12(4) 100 

Musa 

hybrid 

‘Goldfinger’ syn 

Fhia-01 8(2) 3 9(4) 16 10(3) 52 

Nandina 

domestica 

‘Gulf Stream’ 7(1) 7 8(2) 13 9(1) 36 9(3) 73 

Nasturtium 

hybrid 

‘Vicred’ 10(3) 12 11(2) 50 12(1) 72 

Nemesia 

capensis 

‘Tic Toc’ syn Honeydew 12(1) 12 

Neotyphodium 

lolii 

‘AR1’ 10(1) 9 10(2) 30 

sp 

‘AR501’ 10(2) 11 10(2) 29 

Nephrolepis 

exaltata 

‘Capricorn Gold’ 6(4) 8 11(4) 55 

‘Delilah’ 8(1) 3 11(1) 65 

Oenothera 

rosea 

‘Ballerina Hot Pink’syn 

Prima Donna 8(4) 6 10(1) 17 10(4) 61 9(4) 57 12(4) 103 

Olea 

europaea 

‘CSS 02 Minerva’ 8(4) 6 

‘CSS 22 Diana’ 11(3) 11 

‘DA 12 I’ 11(1) 65 

‘DRS 01 Urano’ 11(3) 11 

‘FS 17’ 11(1) 65 

Olearia 

axillaris 

‘Little Smokie’ 12(1) 12 

Ornithopus 

compressus 

‘Charano’ syn 87GEH56 10(3) 12 10(3) 51 

‘Santorini’ syn 

87GEH76c 9(2) 7 10(4) 59 

hybrid 

‘Grasslands Spectra’ syn 

G20 8(2) 6 9(4) 30 10(4) 62 10(1) 51 

11(4) 56 

sativus 

‘Cadiz’ syn ZAF5 9(1) 7 10(2) 34 

‘Grasslands Koha’ 1(4) 23 1(4) 16 2(4) 5 10(4) 65 

161


Oryza 

sativa 

‘YRK4’ 12(1) 13 

Osmanthus 

delavayi 

‘Heaven Sent’ 10(3) 10 12(3) 28 

‘Pearly Gates’ 10(3) 10 12(3) 29 


Notice 

Surrendered/ 

Revoked/ 

Refused 

Osteospermum 

ecklonis 

‘Sunny Alex’ syn Alex 12(4) 12 

‘Sunny Caroline’ syn 

Caroline 12(4) 12 

‘Gustaf’ syn 

Sunny Gustaf 9(2) 6 9(4) 20 10(3) 53 9(3) 73 10(4) 65 

10(3) 56 

‘Ivory Queen’ 10(4) 13 11(4) 55 

‘Kwazulu’ 9(2) 6 9(4) 23 10(3) 53 9(3) 73 10(4) 65 

11(1) 65 

‘Lusaka’ syn 

Breeder’s Ref. 9304 10(1) 9 10(3) 30 11(2) 53 

‘Sunny Lady’ 9(2) 6 9(4) 20 10(3) 53 9(3) 73 10(4) 65 

‘Sunny Silvia’ syn Silvia 12(4) 12 

‘Sunny Sonja’ 12(4) 12 

‘Swazi’ 9(2) 6 9(4) 21 10(3) 53 9(3) 73 10(4) 65 

11(1) 65 

‘Volta’ 9(2) 6 9(3) 73 9(4) 57 10(4) 65 


Volta 9(4) 8 9(4) 21 10(3) 53 11(1) 65 10(4) 65 

(2nd application) 

‘Zimba’ 9(2) 6 9(4) 22 10(3) 53 9(3) 73 10(4) 65 

Ozothamnus 

diosmifolius 

‘Cook’s Birthday Girl’ 11(4) 12 12(3) 57 

‘Cook’s Snow White’ 6(1) 29 6(4) 43 7(4) 40 

‘Cook’s Tall Pink’ 6(1) 29 6(4) 45 7(4) 40 

‘Redlands Sandra’ 

syn Selection 44.7 7(4) 6 8(4) 46 10(2) 58 

Pandorea 

jasminoides 

‘Southern Belle’ 8(2) 3 9(2) 34 10(1) 48 

Panicum 

laxum 

‘Shadegro’ 7(3) 6 7(3) 43 8(2) 31 

maximum 

‘Natsukaze’ 2(2) 30 2(2) 20 5(1) 5 

‘Natsuyutaka’ 4(2) 23 6(2) 8 7(3) 48 6(4) 54 

Paspalum 

atratum 

‘Suerte’ syn Hi-Gane 9(3) 11 

distichum 

‘Flexi-Green’ 10(2) 14 

notatum 

‘Riba’ 7(3) 8 8(2) 8 9(1) 35 

nicorae 

‘Blue Eve’ 12(4) 10 

162




Notice 

Surrendered/ 

Revoked/ 

Refused 

Paulownia 

fortunei 

‘EFF NO.1’ 12(1) 12 

‘Octagenia’ 10(3) 10 11(3) 54 

Pelargonium 

peltatum 

‘Dragonfly’ 11(4) 56 

‘Evka’ 10(1) 9 11(1) 19 11(4) 51 

‘Pendresd’ syn 

Ville De Dresden 10(1) 9 11(1) 19 11(4) 51 10(3) 57 

‘Pentom’ syn Tomboy2 10(4) 12 

‘Penvel’ syn Velvet2 10(4) 12 

tricolor 

‘PEL001’ 12(4) 12 

xhortorum 

‘BFP-838 Dark Red’ syn 

Designer Dark Red 11(1) 9 12(4) 94 12(4) 102 

‘BFP-788 Bright Scarlet’ syn 

Designer Bright Scarlet 11(1) 9 12(4) 92 12(4) 102 

‘BFP-721 Bright Lilac’ syn 

Designer Bright Lilac 11(1) 9 12(4) 91 12(4) 102 

‘Designer Bright Lilac’† 12(4) 102 

‘Designer Bright Scarlet’† 12(4) 102 

‘Designer Dark Red’† 

‘Pink Heart’ syn 


Showcase Pink Heart 11(1) 9 12(4) 95 12(4) 102 

‘Showcase Salmon’ 11(1) 9 12(4) 96 

‘Showcase Pink Heart’† 

‘Starburst Red’ 11(1) 9 12(4) 97 


zonale 

‘Bergpalais’ 10(1) 11 11(1) 56 11(4) 54 

‘Glacis’ 10(1) 11 11(1) 58 11(4) 54 

‘Jana’ 10(1) 11 11(1) 58 11(4) 54 

‘Lovesong’ 10(1) 11 11(1) 65 

‘Orapin’ 10(1) 11 11(1) 60 11(4) 54 

‘Pendaco’ syn Signal 10(1) 11 11(1) 60 11(4) 54 

‘Penosa’ syn Osna 2 10(1) 11 11(1) 65 

‘Pensid’ syn Sidonia 10(1) 11 11(1) 61 11(4) 54 

‘Sassa’ 10(1) 11 11(1) 61 11(4) 54 

‘Sassy Dark Red’ 10(1) 11 11(1) 61 11(4) 54 

Pennisetum 

glaucum 

‘Siromill’ 8(2) 4 8(3) 22 9(2) 61 

Pentas 

lanceolata 

‘Blushing Pearl’ 12(1) 12 

Persea 

americana 

‘Esther’ 2(4) 39 5(1) 26 

‘Gwen’ 2(4) 39 9(4) 14 10(3) 52 

‘H77’ 11(2) 12 12(2) 70 

‘Hebron Emerald’ syn 

Hebron Amor† 

‘Llanos Hass’ 10(3) 9 12(4) 22 


‘Whitsell’ 2(4) 39 5(1) 26 

163



Notice 

Surrendered/ 

Revoked/ 

Refused 

Petunia 

axillaris 

‘Aurora’ syn 

Clone 131085 6(2) 32 9(1) 37 

‘Bonnie Belle’ 6(1) 30 9(1) 37 

‘Cimbrian Glow’ 6(1) 30 9(1) 37 

Cobbitty Rose’ 6(1) 30 9(1) 37 

‘Corsican Love’ 6(1) 29 9(1) 37 

‘Crimean Flame’ 6(1) 30 9(1) 37 

‘Eureka’ syn 

Clone 121095 6(2) 32 9(1) 37 

‘Fire Flash’ 6(1) 30 9(1) 37 

‘Firewalker’ 6(1) 30 9(1) 37 

‘Galactic Flame’ 6(1) 30 9(1) 37 

‘Kilkenny Bells’syn 

Clone 151053 6(2) 32 8(4) 14 9(3) 71 10(4) 65 9(3) 74 

‘Liberty Bell’ 6(1) 30 9(1) 37 

‘Lollipop’ syn 

Clone 151089 6(2) 32 9(1) 37 

‘Maralinga’ 6(1) 30 9(1) 37 

‘Merriman’ 6(1) 30 9(1) 37 

‘Midnight Sun’ 6(1) 30 9(1) 37 

‘Mixtecan Fireworks’ 6(1) 30 9(1) 37 

‘Montezuma Sunset’ 6(1) 30 7(1) 16 8(1) 38 10(1) 50 

‘Musicmaker’ syn 

Clone 151021 6(2) 32 9(1) 37 

‘Palmyra’ 6(1) 30 9(1) 37 

‘Palomar Rose’ 8(2) 4 8(4) 24 9(3) 71 10(3) 56 

‘Pampas Fire’ 6(1) 29 7(1) 15 8(1) 38 10(1) 50 

‘Pink Flirt’ 6(1) 30 9(1) 37 

‘Pink Panther’ 6(1) 29 7(1) 16 8(1) 38 9(1) 37 

‘Pink Victory’ 6(4) 9 7(1) 17 8(1) 38 10(1) 50 

‘Purple Flip’ 6(1) 30 9(1) 37 

‘Purple Frills’ 6(1) 30 9(1) 37 

‘Purple Starlight’ 6(1) 30 9(1) 37 

‘Red Cavalier’ syn 

Clone 131031 6(2) 32 9(1) 37 

‘Ruby Jewel’ syn 

Clone 151076 6(2) 32 9(1) 37 

‘Scarlet Dixie’ 6(1) 29 9(1) 37 

‘Sierra Snow’ 6(1) 29 9(1) 37 

‘Southern Desire’ 6(1) 30 9(1) 37 

‘Star Rider’ 6(1) 30 9(1) 37 

‘Starfire’ syn 

Clone 151043 6(2) 32 9(1) 37 

‘Sun Angelface’ 7(1) 8 8(4) 26 9(3) 72 10(4) 65 

‘Sun Charmer’ 7(1) 8 8(4) 24 9(3) 72 10(4) 65 

‘Sun Dawn’ 8(2) 4 8(4) 21 9(4) 56 10(4) 65 

‘Sun Eclipse’ 7(1) 8 8(4) 26 9(3) 72 10(4) 65 

‘Sun Mogul’ 8(2) 4 8(4) 12 9(3) 72 10(4) 65 

‘Sun Silverliner’ 8(2) 4 8(4) 19 9(4) 56 10(4) 65 

‘Sunangel’ 7(1) 8 9(1) 37 

‘Sunbelkupi’ syn 

Trailing Pink 12(2) 13 12(2) 43 

‘Sunbelkubu’ syn 

Trailing Blue 12(2) 13 12(2) 41 

‘Sunbelkuho’ syn 

Trailing White 12(2) 13 12(2) 42 

‘Sunbelchipi’ syn 

Cherry Pink 12(2) 13 12(2) 41 

‘Sunbride’ 7(1) 8 8(4) 28 9(3) 72 10(4) 65 

‘Suncocktail’ 7(1) 8 8(4) 24 9(3) 72 10(4) 65 

‘Suncool’ 7(1) 8 8(4) 24 9(3) 72 10(4) 65 

‘Sunfire’ syn 

Clone 131070 6(2) 32 9(1) 37 

164




Notice 

Surrendered/ 

Revoked/ 

Refused 

‘Sunfrills’ 7(1) 8 9(1) 37 

‘Sungazer’ 7(1) 8 8(4) 17 9(3) 72 10(4) 65 

‘Sunlace’ 7(1) 8 8(4) 16 9(3) 72 11(3) 54 

‘Sunlark’ 7(2) 7 9(1) 37 

‘Sunmarble’ 7(1) 8 9(1) 37 

‘Sunprom’ 7(1) 8 8(4) 16 9(3) 72 10(4) 65 

‘Sunseeker’ syn 

Clone 151050 6(2) 32 9(1) 37 

‘Sunstormer’ 7(1) 8 8(4) 10 9(3) 72 11(3) 54 

‘Suntruce’ 7(1) 8 9(1) 37 

‘Sunwave’ 8(2) 4 8(4) 23 9(3) 72 10(3) 56 

‘Sweet Victory’ 6(1) 29 7(1) 16 8(1) 38 10(1) 50 

‘Velvet Columbine’ syn 

Clone 121010 6(2) 32 8(4) 21 9(3) 72 10(4) 65 9(3) 74 

‘Wedding Bells’ 6(1) 30 9(1) 37 

‘White Sierra’ 6(1) 30 9(1) 37 

hybrid 

‘Abundance’ 6(1) 30 8(4) 16 9(3) 72 10(4) 65 9(3) 74 

‘Adventurer’ 9(4) 10 11(4) 38 12(3) 56 

‘Alabaster’† 

‘Batavian Night’ 6(1) 30 8(4) 21 9(3) 71 

7(1) 33 

10(4) 65 9(3) 74 

‘Blue Opal’ 6(1) 30 8(4) 26 9(3) 71 10(4) 65 9(3) 74 

‘Blue Wren’ 6(1) 29 8(4) 26 9(3) 71 11(3) 54 9(3) 74 

‘Cobink’ 12(4) 12 

‘Colour Flip’ 6(1) 30 8(4) 28 9(3) 71 10(4) 65 9(3) 74 

‘Desert Light’ syn 


‘Dusky Light’ syn 


‘Frilled Dragon’ 8(2) 4 8(4) 19 9(3) 72 10(4) 65 9(3) 74 

‘Hotlips’ 6(1) 30 8(4) 9 9(3) 72 10(4) 65 9(3) 74 

‘Hush White’ syn 

Hush Light 8(2) 5 9(2) 36 10(1) 48 11(1) 66 9(2) 63 

‘Kristy Rader’ 8(2) 4 8(4) 10 9(3) 72 10(4) 65 9(3) 74 

‘Magenta Light’ 

syn Number 11 8(2) 5 9(2) 37 10(1) 48 11(1)66 

‘Mariposa Red’ 6(1) 30 8(4) 9 9(3) 71 10(4) 65 9(3) 74 

‘Mauve Light’ syn 


‘Orion’ syn 

Clone 131062 6(2) 32 8(4) 14 9(3) 72 10(4) 65 9(3) 74 

‘Pink Confusion’ syn 

Clone 121076 6(2) 32 8(4) 19 9(3) 72 10(4) 65 9(3) 74 

‘Pink Light’ syn 205/7 8(2) 5 9(2) 38 10(1) 48 11(1) 66 

‘Pink Mischief’ 6(1) 29 8(4) 17 9(3) 71 10(4) 65 9(3) 74 

‘Pink Organdy’ 6(1) 30 8(4) 9 9(3) 71 10(4) 65 9(3) 74 

‘Purple Sunspot’ 6(1) 30 8(4) 10 9(3) 71 9(3) 74 

‘Purple Victory’ 8(2) 4 8(4) 23 9(3) 72 10(3) 56 9(3) 74 

‘Pygmy Rose’ 6(1) 30 8(4) 14 9(3) 71 10(4) 65 9(3) 74 

‘Rainbow Warrior’ 6(1) 30 8(4) 23 9(3) 71 10(4) 65 9(3) 74 

‘Ravenna Purple’ 6(1) 30 8(4) 14 9(3) 72 10(4) 65 9(3) 74 

‘Revolution Bluevein’ syn 

Blue Highlights 7(3) 8 10(3) 31 11(2) 54 8(3) 53 

11(2) 56 

‘Revolution Brilliantpink’6(2) 34 8(4) 30 9(3) 72 11(2) 56 

‘Revolution Brilliantpink 

Mini’ 6(2) 34 8(4) 32 9(3) 72 11(2) 56 10(4) 65 

‘Revolution Pastel 

Pink No. 2’ 9(4) 9 10(3) 32 11(2) 54 

‘Revolution Pastelpink’ 6(2) 34 7(2) 29 

‘Revolution Pinkmini’ syn 

Blushing Pink 7(3) 8 10(3) 32 11(2) 54 8(3) 53 

11(2) 56 

‘Revolution Pinkvein’ syn 

Pink Highlights 7(3) 8 10(3) 32 11(2) 54 8(3) 53 

11(2) 56 

165



Notice 

Surrendered/ 

Revoked/ 

Refused 

‘Revolution Purplepink’ 6(2) 34 8(4) 30 9(3) 72 10(4) 65 

‘Revolution Violet No. 2’ 9(4) 9 10(3) 33 11(2) 54 

‘Revolution White’ 6(2) 34 8(4) 34 9(3) 72 11(2) 56 

‘Sanberubu’ syn 

Blue Chimes 8(4) 7 10(3) 35 11(2) 54 10(3) 56 

‘Sanberupi’ syn 

Pink Chimes 8(4) 7 10(3) 35 11(2) 54 10(3) 56 

‘Silk Road’ 9(4) 10 11(4) 39 12(3) 56 

‘Snowpet’† 

‘St. Elmo’s Fire’ 

6(1) 30 

6(1) 29 8(4) 17 9(3) 72 10(4) 65 9(3) 74 

‘Sun Avalanche’ 8(2) 4 8(4) 30 9(3) 72 10(3) 56 9(3) 74 

‘Sun Frost’ 6(1) 30 8(4) 28 9(3) 72 10(4) 65 9(3) 74 

‘Sun Gleam’ 8(2) 4 8(4) 9 9(3) 73 10(3) 56 9(3) 74 

‘Sun Inferno’ 8(2) 4 8(4) 12 9(3) 73 11(3) 54 9(3) 74 

‘Sun Snow’ 6(1) 30 8(4) 28 9(3) 72 7(1) 33 11(3) 54 9(3) 74 

‘Sunbelchipi’ syn 

Cherry Pink 12(2) 13 

‘Sunbelkubu’ syn 

Trailing Blue 12(2) 13 

‘Sunbelkuho’ syn 

Trailing White 12(2) 13 

‘Sunbelkupi’ syn 

Trailing Pink 12(2) 13 

‘Sunkiss’ 7(1) 8 8(4) 17 9(3) 73 10(4) 65 9(3) 74 

‘Sunsolos’ 10(3) 56 

‘Sunsolos’† 

‘Sunspoiler’ 8(2) 4 8(4) 12 9(3) 73 

8(3) 53 

10(3) 56 9(3) 74 

‘Sunstriker’ 8(2) 4 8(4) 12 9(3) 73 10(4) 65 9(3) 74 

‘Suntory SP-B’† 10(3) 56 

‘Suntory SP-R’† 

‘Suntosol’ 

10(3) 56 

10(3) 56 

‘Suntosol’† 

‘Suntovan’ 

8(3) 53 

10(3) 56 

‘Suntovan’† 

‘Sunvane’ 8(2) 4 8(4) 24 9(3) 73 

8(3) 53 

9(3) 74 

‘Thai Silk’ 6(1) 30 8(4) 10 9(3) 72 10(4) 65 9(3) 74 

‘Traveller’ 9(4) 10 11(4) 40 12(3) 56 

‘White Lace’ 8(2) 4 8(4) 19 9(3) 73 10(3) 56 9(3) 74 

integrifolia 

‘Tiger Light’ 8(2) 5 9(2) 38 10(1) 48 11(1) 66 8(3) 53 

Phalaris 

aquatica 

‘Atlas PG’ syn 

Perla Retainer 10(4) 13 11(1) 26 11(4) 52 

‘Australian II’ 10(4) 13 11(1) 26 11(4) 52 

‘Holdfast’ 3(1) 37 3(1) 13 3(4) 4 

‘Landmaster’ syn BP 92 8(2) 5 8(3) 22 9(3) 73 9(3) 73 

Phaseolus 

vulgaris 

‘Barracuda’ 7(2) 6 8(2) 31 

‘Bronco’ 1(4) 23 2(2) 13 3(1) 5 2(1) 15 2(3) 23 

‘Celtic’ 7(2) 6 8(2) 31 

‘Gresham’ 2(2) 30 2(2) 15 3(1) 4 5(3) 6 

‘Jade’ 5(1) 25 6(4) 14 7(4) 41 11(4) 55 5(2) 36 

‘Nelson’ syn Simba 8(1) 4 10(3) 21 11(2) 53 10(4) 66 

‘Phoenix’ 6(2) 31 6(4) 48 7(4) 41 11(4) 55 

‘Rainbird’ syn 

CH93-67D 5(4) 34 6(4) 30 8(1) 38 

‘Rosario’ 6(4) 8 8(1) 39 

‘Sarande’ syn RS-1237 6(4) 8 8(1) 39 

‘Sirius’ syn CH126-31D 5(4) 34 6(4) 29 8(1) 38 

166




Notice 

Surrendered/ 

Revoked/ 

Refused 

‘Spearfelt’ syn 

CH187-2D 6(2) 31 6(4) 47 8(4) 49 

‘XPB 247’ syn 

Matador 6(1) 31 6(3) 37 7(4) 40 6(2) 34 

Philodendron 

selloum 

‘Little Piccolo’ 10(1) 9 11(1) 66 

Philotheca 

myoporoides 

‘Lime Delight’ 12(3) 11 12(4) 34 

Photinia 

hybrid 

‘Paradise Burgundy’† 

‘Superhedge’ 9(1) 6 10(2) 44 11(1) 64 

10(3) 56 

10(3) 56 

x fraseri 

‘Allyn Sprite’ 7(4) 7 8(4) 44 9(3) 73 

Picea 

pungens 

‘Raymur Springs’ 9(1) 5 10(1) 50 

Pimelea 

ferruginea 

‘Pink Bouquet’ 4(3) 26 4(3) 21 5(3) 5 

Pinus 

mugo 

‘Amber Gold’ 6(4) 5 6(4) 49 7(4) 40 

Pisum 

sativum 

‘Bluey’ 4(1) 25 4(1) 22 5(4) 5 10(4) 65 

‘Bonzer’ 4(3) 26 4(3) 20 7(3) 47 11(1) 66 

‘Cooke’ 12(4) 11 12(4) 35 

‘Dinkum’ 1(4) 23 1(4) 19 2(3) 4 2(1) 15 8(3) 53 

‘Excell’ 11(4) 11 12(1) 28 12(4) 99 12(4) 103 

‘Flinders’ 4(4) 23 6(3) 46 5(2) 36 

‘Frolic’ 2(2) 31 3(4) 37 

‘Helena’ 12(4) 11 12(4) 36 

‘Jupiter’ 5(3) 18 6(1) 25 6(4) 53 

‘King’ syn DSIR-173-1 10(2) 13 11(1) 17 11(4) 52 11(2) 56 

‘Laura’ syn A163-5 8(1) 4 10(4) 64 

‘Magnet’ syn 

DSIR-128-5 10(2) 13 11(1) 18 11(4) 52 11(2) 56 

‘Mukta’ 12(1) 12 12(4) 37 12(2) 71 

‘Parafield’ 12(1) 11 12(4) 38 12(2) 71 

‘Paravic’ 11(4) 11 12(1) 29 12(4) 99 12(4) 103 

‘Purple Delight’ 8(1) 3 10(1) 50 

‘Santi’ 12(1) 12 12(4) 39 12(2) 71 

‘Snowpeak’ 12(3) 10 

‘Snowy’ 11(4) 11 

‘Solara’ 2(2) 30 

‘Soupa’ 12(1) 12 12(4) 40 12(2) 71 

‘Trounce’ 8(4) 6 10(3) 23 

Pittosporum 

bicolour x undulatum 

‘Cut Above’ 10(4) 13 11(2) 56 

ralphii 

‘Cathy’ 12(2) 13 

167


tenuifolium 

‘PTGP1’ 12(2) 14 

‘PTSS1’ 12(2) 14 

‘PTSS2’ 12(2) 14 

‘Screenmaster’ 10(4) 13 11(3) 37 

Polygala 

myrtifolia var grandiflora 

‘White Flamingo’ 12(4) 13 


Notice 

Surrendered/ 

Revoked/ 

Refused 

Plantago 

lanceolata 

‘Ceres Tonic’ syn PG30 9(1) 6 9(2) 39 10(2) 57 10(2) 59 

‘Grasslands Lancelot’ 9(1) 7 9(2) 39 10(1) 48 

Platysace 

‘Valentine Lace’ 10(2) 13 11(2) 40 12(1) 71 

Plectranthus 

ciliatus 

‘Easy Gold’ 8(4) 8 9(4) 50 10(3) 55 

Plumbago 

auriculata 

‘Monott’ syn Royal Cape 5(3) 19 7(2) 14 8(1) 39 

Poa 

annua 

‘MN 117’ 11(4) 10 

‘MN 184’ 11(4) 10 

‘MN 234’ 11(4) 10 

ensioformis 

‘Corama’ 10(2) 13 11(3) 54 

labillardieri 

‘Eskdale’ 10(3) 12 

Potentilla 

fruticosa 

‘Marrob’ syn 

Marian Red Robin 8(1) 5 9(3) 73 

Protea 

amplexicaulis x 

‘Joey’ 4(1) 25 6(4) 9 7(4) 40 

grandicep x longiflora 

‘Grandicolor’ 12(1) 13 

hybrid 

‘Pink Cupid’ 9(3) 11 11(1) 33 11(4) 53 

‘Pink Pride’ 9(3) 11 11(1) 33 11(4) 53 

‘White Mist’ 9(3) 11 11(1) 34 11(4) 53 

‘White Night’ 9(3) 11 11(1) 35 11(4) 53 

magnifica x compacta 

‘Pink Lady’† 

‘Pink Princess’ 8(1) 5 9(3) 47 10(2) 57 

8(4) 51 

8(4) 51 

magnifica x longifolia 

‘Possum Magic’ 4(1) 25 6(1) 7 7(1) 32 

pudens x longifolia 

‘Pixie’ 6(4) 7 9(1) 22 9(4) 56 

Prunus 

armeniaca 

‘Cluthagold’ syn 

Clutha 13/43 8(1) 3 10(4) 19 11(3) 51 

‘Earlicot’ 9(1) 4 11(3) 14 12(2) 68 

‘Huon Pride’ 8(3) 4 

168




Notice 

Surrendered/ 

Revoked/ 

Refused 

‘Kinross’ 8(2) 2 11(2) 56 

‘Poppicot’ 12(2) 10 

‘Rivergem’ 11(2) 12 

‘Ruby’ 8(2) 2 10(2) 21 11(1) 62 

avium 

‘Brooks’ syn DEC-28 6(4) 8 7(4) 25 8(3) 52 

‘Celeste’ syn 13s-24-28 7(2) 5 

‘Empress’ 4(4) 23 5(2) 8 6(1) 7 

‘Gaudion’ 2(3) 23 7(3) 49 

‘Lapins’ 4(1) 25 5(1) 7 

‘Sir Don’ 11(2) 15 

‘Sir Tom’ 11(2) 15 

‘Summerland’ syn 

13s-18-15 7(2) 5 9(3) 74 

‘Sumtare’ syn 

Sweetheart 11(4) 20 12(3) 56 11(4) 55 

‘Sweetheart’ syn 

13s-22-8† 

‘Sylvia’ syn 4c-17-31 

7(1) 9 

7(2) 5 9(3) 74 

canescens 

‘GM 79’ syn Camil 6(2) 32 10(2) 28 11(1) 63 

cerasifera var nigra 

‘Rosalind’ syn 11(1) 8 

Beauty’ 

cerasus x canescens 

‘Gisela 5’ syn GI 148-2 9(3) 9 

‘Gisela 6’ syn GI 148/1 11(3) 11 

dawyckensis 

‘GM61/1’ syn Damil 6(2) 32 10(2) 27 11(1) 63 

domestica 

‘Ausibelle’ syn 

110GD11 7(3) 8 8(4) 51 

‘Corio Queen’ 11(2) 14 12(1) 74 

domestica x armeniaca 

‘Red Velvet’ 3(3) 26 7(3) 49 

hybrid 

‘Atlas’ syn 60EB160 7(4) 6 12(3) 43 

‘Blue Gusto’ 12(3) 12 

‘Dapple Dandy’ 12(3) 11 

‘Flavor Queen’ syn 

29EB179 7(4) 5 11(1) 66 

‘Flavor Heart’ 12(2) 14 

‘Flavorich’ 12(2) 14 

‘Flavor Supreme’ 

‘Royal Velvet’ 5(3) 18 7(3) 49 

syn 28EB12 7(4) 5 

8(1) 5 

‘Viking’ 12(4) 12 

incisa x serrulata 

‘GM9’ syn Inmil 6(2) 32 10(2) 27 11(1) 63 

persica 

‘Autumn Flame’ 12(4) 102 

‘Autumn Snow’ syn 

Yukon King 12(3) 11 

‘7GC153’† 

‘Avimag’ syn 41.4.21 8(4) 6 


‘Earlirich’ 8(3) 6 10(4) 35 11(3) 52 

‘Eva’s Pride’ 9(4) 9 11(4) 55 

‘French Lady’ syn 

C88.83PB 9(3) 11 10(1) 28 10(4) 62 12(1) 73 

‘Julie’ syn Tendresse 8(4) 7 10(1) 28 10(4) 62 12(1) 73 

‘June Crest’ syn 10e370 2(3) 23 7(2) 9 9(2) 61 

‘Kialla’ 8(1) 5 9(1) 22 9(4) 56 

‘King Alvise’ 8(4) 7 11(2) 38 12(2) 69 

11(3) 32 

‘Melodie’ 2(4) 39 7(2) 12 9(1) 36 11(2) 56 9(2) 63 

169



Notice 

Surrendered/ 

Revoked/ 

Refused 

‘Merit’ 8(4) 7 9(3) 39 10(2) 57 

‘Pix-Zee’ 7(3) 8 10(4) 36 11(3) 52 

‘Red Coast’ 9(1) 6 

‘Red Moon’ 9(1) 6 

‘Red Valley’ 9(1) 6 

‘Rich Lady’ syn 8GC128 5(3) 20 7(4) 10 9(1) 36 

‘Rich May’ syn 65EC75 7(4) 5 9(2) 35 10(1) 48 

‘Scarlet Snow’ 12(2) 13 

‘September Snow’ 9(4) 9 11(3) 33 12(2) 69 

‘Snowbrite’ 12(2) 13 

‘Snow Diamond’ 4(2) 23 7(3) 49 

‘Snow Fire’ 12(3) 11 

‘Snow Giant’ 10(1) 10 11(3) 32 12(2) 70 

‘Snow King’ 9(4) 9 11(3) 34 12(2) 69 

‘Sophia’s Blush’ 11(3) 54 

‘Spring Snow’ 12(3) 11 

‘Summer Sweet’ 9(4) 9 11(3) 34 12(2) 69 

‘Summer Zee’ 9(4) 9 11(4) 55 

‘Sweet Dream’ 12(4) 12 

‘Sweet Scarlet’ 9(4) 9 12(2) 37 

‘Sweet September’ 12(3) 11 

‘Symphonie’ 2(4) 39 7(2) 11 9(1) 36 12(1) 73 

‘Tasty Zee’ syn 

32EA300 2(3) 23 7(2) 9 9(2) 61 

‘Tribute’ syn 2083.PJ 9(3) 11 10(3) 30 11(2) 54 

‘Tucker’s’ syn Tucker’s 

Autumn Blush 9(2) 7 

‘Vista’ syn Vistarich 9(4) 9 11(3) 35 12(2) 69 10(4) 64 

‘Zee Lady’ 2(3) 23 7(2) 10 9(2) 61 

persica var nucipersica 

‘99LB329’† 

‘April Glo syn 39GA188 7(3) 8 9(2) 32 10(1) 48 



‘Arctic Blaze’ 12(2) 12 

‘Arctic Jay’ 10(1) 12 12(2) 69 

‘Arctic Pride’ 12(2) 12 

‘Arctic Queen’ 7(3) 8 9(3) 36 10(2) 57 

‘Arctic Rose’ syn 

161GD123 5(3) 20 7(4) 9 8(4) 50 

‘Arctic Show’ syn 

Arctic Snow 7(3) 8 9(3) 37 10(2) 57 10(2) 59 

‘Arctic Star’ 10(1) 10 11(3) 28 12(2) 70 

‘Arctic Sweet’ 9(4) 9 12(2) 69 

‘Autumn Royal’ syn 

33GD109 9(3) 74 

‘Bright Pearl’ syn Bright Ice 12(2) 12 

‘Diamond Bright’ syn 

Crimson Bright 12(2) 12 

‘Earliglo’ syn 62RA286 8(2) 4 9(2) 32 10(1) 48 

‘Fire Pearl’ syn Fire Ice 12(2) 12 

‘Grand Pearl’ syn Grand Ice12(2) 12 

‘Harmonie’ 2(4) 39 3(4) 37 

‘Honey Blaze’ 12(2) 12 

‘Honey Kist’ 12(2) 12 

‘June Pearl’ syn June Ice 12(2) 12 

‘Liz’s Late’ syn 18K374 8(3) 6 10(1) 23 10(4) 62 12(1) 73 

‘Necta Zee’ 7(3) 8 10(4) 33 11(3) 52 

‘Queen Silla’ 9(1) 6 

‘Royal Glo’ syn 

78EE322 8(2) 4 9(2) 33 10(1) 48 

‘Ruby Pearl’ syn Ruby Ice 12(2) 12 

‘Spring Sweet’ syn Spring 

Gold† 

‘Spring Sweet’ 12(2) 12 



170




Notice 

Surrendered/ 

Revoked/ 

Refused 

‘Springfield Red’ 12(1) 12 

‘Ruby Diamond’ 8(3) 6 10(2) 40 11(1) 64 

‘Venus’ 7(4) 6 10(1) 24 11(2) 53 

‘Zee Glo’ syn 32R331 6(3) 45 10(1) 25 10(4) 62 

salicina 

‘Autumn Sunrise’ syn 

67GC75 9(1) 5 11(1) 66 

‘Awaso’ 12(1) 12 

‘Betty Anne’ 9(4) 8 11(3) 38 12(2) 68 

‘Earliqueen’ 8(4) 6 10(4) 38 11(3) 52 

‘Hiromi Red’ 12(3) 10 

‘Pizazz’ syn 64GC173 8(2) 3 9(2) 62 

‘Primetime’ 7(1) 7 

‘Sapphire’ 11(4) 11 

‘Showtime’ 7(1) 7 

‘Souvenir’ 11(4) 11 

‘Suplumtwenty’ 12(1) 12 

salicina x persica 

‘Citation’ syn 4G816† 

‘Zaipime’ syn 4G816 6(3) 45 12(3) 44 



subhirtella 

‘Winter Sun’ 3(4) 38 3(4) 31 5(1) 7 4(3) 26 

yedoensis 

‘Afterglow’ 4(1) 25 4(3) 26 

Pseuderanthemum 

repandum 

‘Cabaret’ 8(4) 7 9(3) 47 10(2) 57 

Ptilotus 

exaltatus 

‘Pink Feather’ 10(4) 15 12(1) 73 

Pyrus 

calleryana 

‘Claremont’ 4(2) 23 6(3) 46 

communis 

‘BM 2000’ 11(3) 11 

‘Corinella’ 8(3) 6 10(3) 57 


‘Corinella’ 

(2nd application) 11(4) 10 12(4) 48 

‘Emerald Prince’ 10(3) 10 

‘Pyvert’ 10(2) 13 

‘Red Princess’ 8(1) 5 11(2) 39 12(1) 71 

‘Rosemarie Beauty’ 9(4) 9 

‘Sophia’s Gold’ 8(3) 6 

‘Sophia’s Pride’ 6(2) 26 6(2) 26 7(2) 28 8(4) 51 

‘Taylors Gold’ 9(2) 7 

‘Tichbon’ 8(2) 4 9(4) 34 10(3) 54 11(2) 56 

‘Wimmer’s Beauty’ 9(1) 6 

hybrid 11(2) 56 

‘Daisui Li’ 2(4) 39 9(4) 57 

‘Shin Li’ 2(4) 39 9(4) 57 

pyrifolia 

‘Gold Nijisseiki’ 10(2) 12 12(1) 31 

Radermachera 

sinica 

‘Kaprima’ syn 

Crystal Doll 3(4) 38 4(4) 7 5(4) 5 4(4) 23 

9(3) 73 

‘Limelight’† 

Rhipsalis 

4(4) 23 

hybrid 

‘Matilda’ 6(4) 9 11(1) 36 11(4) 54 

171



Notice 

Surrendered/ 

Revoked/ 

Refused 

Rhododendron 

azaleoides hybrid 

‘Fiesta’ syn Paradise 

Harlequin 4(4) 23 4(4) 16 6(3) 6 5(2) 36 5(1) 26 

‘Harlequin’† 

hybrid 

5(2) 36 

‘Australian Cameo’ 6(3) 45 8(2) 28 9(1) 36 8(4) 52 

‘Australian Celebration’ 12(1) 10 12(3) 57 

‘Australian Rainbow’ 6(3) 44 8(2) 28 9(1) 36 11(2) 56 8(4) 52 

‘Australian Sunset’ 6(3) 45 8(2) 28 9(1) 36 

‘Coconut Ice’ 3(3) 26 3(3) 20 4(2) 4 

‘Coffee Caramel’ 12(1) 10 12(3) 57 

‘Laura Joy’ 11(2) 15 11(4) 13 12(3) 55 

‘Maria’s Choice’ 6(3) 44 8(2) 30 9(1) 36 8(4) 52 

‘Paradise Christine’ 8(2) 3 9(2) 12 10(1) 47 8(4) 52 

9(4) 57 

10(1) 51 

‘Paradise Louise’ 8(2) 3 9(2) 13 10(1) 47 8(4) 52 

10(1) 51 

‘Princess Barbara’ syn 

77-8-C 7(3) 7 7(4) 16 8(3) 51 

‘Princess Charlotte’syn 

77-3-4 7(3) 7 

‘Princess Pat’ syn 

70-27-1 7(3) 7 7(4) 36 8(3) 51 

‘Princess Sharon’ 

syn 68-13-3 7(3) 7 7(4) 35 8(3) 51 

‘Tilly Aston’ 12(1) 10 12(3) 57 

simsii 

‘Aquarell’ 9(2) 5 10(3) 14 11(2) 52 

‘Beenak’ 9(2) 5 10(3) 15 11(2) 52 

‘Cencerre’ 9(2) 5 10(2) 60 

‘Colleen Fahey’ 7(2) 6 7(4) 30 8(4) 49 

‘Dyana’† 

‘Evonne Goolagong’ syn 

11(2) 55 

White Bouquet 

Variegated 7(3) 7 7(4) 34 8(3) 51 

‘Heide Hanisch’ 8(3) 5 8(4) 37 9(3) 70 

‘Kenny Lane Lou Lou’ 9(2) 5 10(3) 15 12(1) 69 11(2) 55 

‘Lumeha’ 9(2) 5 11(3) 15 

‘Melodie’ 8(3) 5 8(4) 37 9(3) 71 

‘Nanu’ 8(3) 5 8(4) 51 

‘Noemi’ syn 

Kosmos-Bunt 8(3) 5 8(4) 38 9(3) 71 12(3) 57 

‘Ostalett’ 7(2) 6 7(4) 30 8(3) 51 

‘Ostali’ 7(2) 6 7(4) 31 8(3) 51 

‘Otto’ 7(2) 6 7(4) 36 8(3) 51 

‘Paradiso’ 8(3) 5 8(4) 38 9(3) 71 

‘Potpurri’ 9(2) 5 10(3) 16 11(2) 52 

‘Theo’ 7(2) 6 7(4) 31 8(3) 51 

‘Venus’ syn 

Kosmos-Bunt† 

x azaleoides 


‘Sydney’s Sesqui’ 5(1) 24 5(4) 15 6(3) 6 11(3) 54 

Robinia 

hispida x pseudoacacia 

‘Purple Crown’ 3(3) 26 9(1) 37 

pseudoacacia 

‘Lace Lady’ 8(2) 3 9(3) 18 10(2) 55 

hybrid 

‘Unigold’ 11(4) 10 11(4) 41 12(3) 55 

Rosa 

banksiae 

‘Powder Puff’ 11(3) 10 

172




Notice 

Surrendered/ 

Revoked/ 

Refused 

chinensis 

‘Savabear’ syn 

Teddy Bear 7(2) 5 9(4) 38 10(4) 63 

grandiflora 

‘Michelle Joy’ syn 

Aroshrel 4(1) 25 4(3) 10 5(3) 6 10(3) 56 

hybrid 

‘Adelfi’ syn Selnitro 4(4) 23 6(1) 31 

‘Aotearoa’ syn Macgenev 5(1) 25 5(3) 7 6(2) 5 5(2) 36 

‘Arobipy’ syn Crystalline 3(2) 34 3(2) 17 4(1) 4 5(1) 26 

‘Arotrusim’ syn 

‘Bloomin’ Easy 3(2) 34 3(2) 18 4(1) 4 11(1) 66 

‘Ausbrid’ syn 

Mayor Of Casterbridge 12(2) 14 

‘Ausjo’ syn Jude 

The Obscure 12(1) 13 

‘Ausmum’ syn Pat Austin 12(2) 14 

‘Ausbloom’ syn 

The Dark Lady 8(3) 7 9(3) 48 10(2) 58 11(1) 65 

‘Ausblush’ syn Heritage 3(2) 34 6(3) 8 7(2) 29 11(1) 65 

‘Ausbord’ syn 

Gertrude Jekyll 4(2) 23 8(3) 24 9(2) 61 11(1) 65 

‘Ausbreak’ syn Jayne Austin7(1) 9 9(3) 49 10(2) 58 11(1) 65 

‘Auscent’ syn John Clare 11(2) 15 12(2) 44 

‘Auscomp’ syn Happy Child 11(2) 57 

‘Auscot’ syn 

Abraham Darby 3(2) 34 6(3) 6 7(2) 29 11(1) 65 

‘Auscrim’ syn 

L D Braithwaite 6(2) 33 7(3) 24 8(3) 52 11(1) 65 

‘Ausfin’ syn Financial 

Times Centenary 6(2) 33 7(3) 24 8(3) 52 11(1) 65 

‘Ausgold’ syn 

Golden Celebration 9(2) 8 10(2) 45 11(1) 64 11(1) 65 

‘Ausjo’ syn Jude de 

Obscure 12(1) 13 12(2) 44 

‘Ausland’ syn Scepter d’ Isle12(1) 13 12(2) 45 

‘Ausled’ 

syn A Shropshire Lad 12(2) 14 

‘Auslevel’ syn 

Glamis Castle 9(2) 8 10(2) 46 11(1) 64 11(1) 65 

‘Ausmak’ syn Eglantyne 10(2) 13 10(2) 46 11(1) 64 11(1) 65 

‘Ausmit’ syn St Cecilia 5(3) 17 7(3) 12 8(3) 52 11(1) 65 

‘Ausmol’ syn Molineux 11(2) 15 11(2) 41 12(1) 71 

‘Ausmoon’ syn Pegasus 12(1) 13 12(2) 45 

‘Auspale’ syn Redoute 9(2) 8 10(2) 47 11(1) 64 11(1) 65 

‘Ausreef’ syn 

Sharifa Asma 7(1) 9 9(3) 49 10(2) 58 11(1) 65 

‘Aussal’ syn 

Radio Times 11(2) 15 11(2) 41 12(1) 71 

‘Aussaucer’ syn Evelyn 8(3) 7 10(2) 48 11(1) 64 11(1) 65 

‘Ausvelvet’ syn 

The Prince 7(1) 9 9(3) 50 10(2) 58 11(1) 65 

‘Auswalker’ syn 

The Pilgrim 8(3) 7 9(3) 51 10(2) 58 11(1) 65 

‘Ausway’ syn Noble Antony12(2) 14 

‘Auswhite’ syn Swan 4(2) 23 6(3) 9 7(2) 29 11(1) 65 

‘Auswonder’ syn 

Ambridge 7(1) 9 9(3) 52 10(2) 58 10(2) 59 

11(1) 65 

‘Baby Jack’ 11(3) 11 12(4) 53 

‘Benfig’ syn Figurine 6(3) 44 7(3) 35 8(3) 52 

‘Benlavscent’ syn 

Moon River 8(4) 7 9(3) 53 11(1) 64 10(2) 59 

‘Benmable’ syn 

Bennardella’s Waltz 11(3) 11 12(4) 54 

173



Notice 

Surrendered/ 

Revoked/ 

Refused 

‘Benmagic’ syn Pirouette 8(4) 7 9(3) 53 10(2) 58 

‘Benmech’ syn 

Kates Delight 11(3) 11 12(4) 102 

‘Benmfig’ syn 

Benardella’s Pearl 11(3) 11 12(4) 102 

‘Benmjul’ syn 

Benardella’s Ruby 11(3) 12 12(4) 55 

‘Benmoon’† 

‘Betsy Taaffe’ 9(3) 11 12(1) 49 12(4) 100 

10(2) 59 

‘Brigadoon’ syn Jacpal 5(1) 25 5(3) 9 6(2) 5 

‘Brilliant Pink Iceberg syn 

Probril 11(1) 9 11(2) 42 12(1) 71 

‘Bruninitial’ syn 

Brundrett Centenary 6(2) 31 7(1) 24 8(1) 39 12(4) 103 

‘Carol Ann’ syn 

Wel Car 9(3) 11 10(1) 50 

‘Catherine Mcauley’ syn 

Jacibras 6(1) 29 6(3) 34 7(3) 48 

‘Ce/500’† 

‘Cecilia’ 4(2) 23 4(2) 19 5(3) 5 

10(1) 50 

‘Chameleon’ 5(4) 34 8(3) 24 9(2) 61 9(4) 57 

‘Chewizz’ syn 

Warm Welcome 8(2) 5 10(4) 64 

‘Class Act’ syn Jacare 5(1) 25 5(3) 8 6(2) 5 

‘Climbing Cardinal’ 11(4) 12 

‘Cocdestin’ 3(2) 34 4(2) 12 5(4) 5 

‘Crimson Miniwonder† 

‘Delicious’ syn Weldel 5(2) 35 8(3) 25 9(2) 61 

6(2) 34 

‘Delivour’ syn 

Imperatrice Farah 9(3) 11 11(1) 65 10(4) 64 

‘Devilk’ syn 

Sparkling Orange 6(3) 43 8(3) 26 9(2) 61 

‘Devnovia’ syn Megan 6(3) 43 8(3) 35 9(2) 62 

‘Devrise’ syn 

Cerise Dawn 6(3) 43 8(3) 36 9(2) 62 

‘Devtinta’ syn Obsession 6(3) 43 8(3) 37 9(2) 62 

‘Dicmoppet’ syn 

Minilights 6(2) 31 7(1) 26 8(1) 39 9(1) 37 

‘Dictator’ syn Pure Bliss 12(2) 14 

‘Dicobey’ syn 

Tequila Sunrise 5(2) 15 5(2) 15 7(2) 28 

‘Dicsingsong’ syn 

Patio Kaleidoscope 10(3) 11 12(2) 46 

‘Dicstereo’ 10(3) 11 12(2) 47 

‘Dollar’ 4(4) 23 6(1) 8 6(4) 53 8(1) 39 8(4) 52 

‘Dorothea Howard’ 7(4) 7 

‘Fairy Fire’ 6(2) 32 9(1) 37 

‘Fairy Queen’ 12(2) 14 

‘Flower Carpet’† 

‘Fred Hollows Vision’ 9(3) 11 10(2) 51 11(1) 64 10(2) 59 

5(4) 35 

‘Frystar’ syn Liverpool 

Remembers 7(4) 7 8(3) 39 9(2) 62 

‘Frytranquil’ syn Golden 

Moments 7(4) 7 8(3) 40 9(2) 62 

‘Frytrooper’ syn 

Daily Post 7(4) 7 8(3) 41 9(2) 62 

Fryxotic syn 

Warm wishes 11(1) 9 

‘Golden Friendship’ syn 

Hartellody 4(2) 23 4(2) 14 5(4) 5 12(4) 103 

‘Grandalpha’ 12(4) 13 

174




Notice 

Surrendered/ 

Revoked/ 

Refused 

‘Hans Christian Andersen’ syn 

Poulander 4(1) 25 4(3) 17 5(3) 6 10(3) 56 

‘Hansug’ syn 

Sugar Plum Fairy 9(3) 11 

‘Happy Days’ syn 

Macseatri 4(1) 25 4(3) 11 5(3) 5 10(3) 56 

‘Harbella’ syn 

Peacekeeper 10(2) 13 

‘Hardinkum’ syn 

Princess of Wales 11(4) 12 

‘Harwoey’ syn 

Yesteryear 7(3) 5 10(2) 60 

‘Harxever’ syn 

Joy Of Health 10(2) 13 

‘Haryup’ 10(3) 11 

‘Helhein’ syn 

Super Sparkle 11(4) 12 

‘Helkewei’ syn 

Super Bianca 11(3) 12 

‘Helkleger’ syn 

Super Elfin 11(4) 12 

‘Helsufair’ syn 

Super Fairy 10(1) 10 11(4) 42 12(3) 56 12(3) 57 

‘Howard Florey’ 11(4) 12 

‘Interdust’ 9(2) 8 10(3) 56 

‘Interkuyl’ 12(3) 12 

‘Interlene’ 12(1) 13 

‘Interlien’ syn Evelien 4(1) 25 4(1) 20 5(4) 5 

‘Interlis’ syn Lydia 8(2) 5 10(1) 32 10(4) 64 

‘Intermoto’ syn Joy 4(1) 25 4(1) 20 5(4) 5 4(3) 26 

‘Internes’ 12(3) 12 

‘Interniki’ syn Nikita 4(1) 25 4(1) 21 5(4) 5 

‘Interonly’ syn Only Love 

(1st application) 4(2) 23 4(2) 18 5(4) 5 

‘Interonly’ syn Only Love 

(2nd application) 6(3) 44 7(3) 32 8(2) 31 

‘Interpeach’ syn Peachy 7(2) 9 10(1) 32 10(4) 63 11(4) 56 

7(4) 5 

‘Interprince’ syn Princess 4(1) 25 4(1) 20 5(4) 5 

‘Interpur’ syn 

Purple Prince 7(1) 5 9(1) 37 

‘Intersept’ syn 

Ruby Rosamini 7(1) 9 9(2) 40 10(1) 48 

‘Intersiree’ syn Swing 7(1) 5 9(1) 37 

‘Intertyn’ syn Sentyna 7(1) 5 9(1) 37 

‘Jacable’ syn Fascination 7(1) 6 8(1) 30 8(4) 50 

‘Jacchry’ syn Breathless 7(1) 6 8(1) 30 8(4) 50 

‘Jacina’ syn Wild Dancer 11(3) 12 

‘Jacirst’ syn Artistry 11(3) 12 

‘Jaccofl’ syn Brass Band 9(2) 8 10(3) 36 11(2) 54 

‘Jacdash’ syn 

Rose of Wagga Wagga 7(1) 6 8(1) 31 8(4) 50 

‘Jacfre’ syn 

City of Goulburn 8(1) 5 9(1) 24 9(4) 56 

‘Jachipow’ syn 12(4) 13 

Pretty in white 

‘Jachotam’ syn 12(4) 13 

Pretty in Candy 

‘Jachotse’ syn 12(4) 13 

Pretty in Yellow 

‘Jacshaq’ 12(4) 13 

175



Notice 

Surrendered/ 

Revoked/ 

Refused 

‘Jacient’ syn 

Tournament of Roses 6(1) 29 6(3) 35 7(3) 47 

‘Jaclaf’ syn 

Moon Shadow 9(4) 10 11(4) 42 12(3) 56 

‘Jaclin’ syn Patriot 8(1) 5 9(1) 25 9(4) 56 

‘Jacolber’ syn 

Opening Night 11(3) 12 

‘Jacmobli’ syn 12(4) 13 

Pretty in Pink 

‘Jacnor’ syn Signature 9(2) 8 10(3) 36 11(2) 54 

‘Jacpif’ syn Pleasure 6(1) 29 6(3) 33 7(3) 48 

‘Jacpihi’ syn 

Grand Finale ‘98 11(3) 12 

‘Jacsedi’ syn Love Potion 8(1) 5 9(1) 25 9(4) 56 

‘Jacsim’ syn 

Sweet Inspiration 7(1) 6 8(1) 31 8(4) 50 

‘Jactemp’ syn 12(4) 13 

Pretty in Red 

‘Jactop’ syn Legend 7(1) 6 8(1) 31 8(4) 50 

‘Jactou’ syn Midas Touch 9(2) 8 10(3) 36 11(2) 54 

‘Jacyef’ syn 

Shining Hour 6(1) 29 6(3) 32 7(3) 48 

‘Jaczor’ syn Fame ‘98 11(3) 12 

‘Jean Galbraith’ 12(2) 14 

‘Jumpin’Jack’ syn Jacpat 9(2) 8 11(4) 43 12(3) 56 

‘Keijourna’ syn Aurelia 2(1) 14 2(3) 5 3(2) 5 9(2) 63 3(2) 35 

‘Keimove’ syn Prelude 7(3) 8 9(3) 74 

‘Keinoumi’ 3(4) 38 4(3) 8 5(3) 5 

‘Keitaibu’ 3(3) 26 4(3) 8 5(3) 5 

‘Keizoubo’ syn Pareo 5(3) 19 5(4) 21 6(3) 6 

‘Kimba’ syn Selcuper 5(1) 24 

‘Kooiana Butterscotch’ syn 

St Hilda’s 8(1) 5 8(3) 42 9(2) 62 

‘Kooiana Daybreak’ 3(2) 34 3(2) 19 4(1) 4 5(3) 6 12(1) 74 

‘Kooiana Moonlight’ syn 

Guildfordian 8(1) 5 8(3) 42 9(2) 62 

‘Kooiana Watermelon’ 8(1) 5 8(3) 43 9(2) 62 11(2) 56 

‘Koranderer’ syn 

Our Copper Queen 10(3) 11 11(2) 43 12(1) 71 

‘Korazerka’ syn Ekstase 9(2) 8 10(3) 37 11(2) 54 

‘Korbacol’ syn Texas 7(2) 8 9(3) 54 10(2) 58 

‘Korbasren’ syn 

Pink Bassino 9(2) 8 11(2) 43 12(1) 71 

‘Korbolak’ syn Melody 3(1) 37 3(2) 22 4(1) 4 

‘Korcilmo’ syn Escimo 7(2) 8 9(3) 55 10(2) 58 

‘Korcrisett’ syn Calibra 7(2) 8 9(3) 55 10(2) 58 

‘Kordaba’ syn Lambada 7(2) 7 9(3) 56 10(2) 58 

‘Korfeimot’ syn 

Grafin Sonja 9(2) 8 10(2) 60 

‘Korferse’ syn Coco 4(2) 23 4(2) 20 6(4) 53 10(4) 65 

‘Korfischer’ syn 

Hansa-Park 9(2) 8 11(2) 44 12(1) 71 

‘Korgenoma’ syn Emely 10(3) 11 11(3) 38 12(2) 69 

‘Korhoco’ syn Vital 10(3) 11 11(3) 39 12(2) 69 

‘Korkunde’ syn Toscana 3(1) 37 3(2) 23 4(1) 4 

‘Korlaper’ syn La Perla 7(2) 8 9(3) 57 10(2) 58 

‘Korlis’ syn Eliza 9(2) 8 11(3) 39 12(2) 69 

‘Kormador’ syn Tamara 3(1) 37 3(2) 24 4(1) 4 

‘Kormarec’ syn 

Sommerabend 9(2) 8 11(2) 45 12(1) 71 

‘Kormiller’ syn Dream 9(2) 8 10(3) 38 11(2) 54 

‘Kormurena’ syn 

Magic Silver 10(3) 11 11(3) 54 

‘Korokis’ syn Rose Kiss 3(1) 37 3(2) 24 4(1) 4 

176




Notice 

Surrendered/ 

Revoked/ 

Refused 

‘Koromtar’ syn 

Cream Dream 10(3) 11 11(3) 40 12(2) 69 

‘Korpinka’ syn 

Summer Fairytale 7(2) 7 9(3) 58 10(2) 58 

‘Korplasina’ syn 

Our Vanilla 9(2) 9 10(3) 38 11(2) 54 

‘Korrogilo’ 12(2) 14 

‘Korruicil’ syn 

Our Esther 10(3) 11 11(3) 41 12(2) 69 

‘Korschwama’ syn 

Black Madonna 7(2) 8 9(3) 59 10(2) 58 

‘Korsorb’ syn Cubana 4(2) 23 6(2) 12 7(2) 28 

‘Korsulas’ syn Limona 10(3) 11 11(3) 41 12(2) 69 

‘Kortanken’ syn 

Domstadt Fulda 9(2) 9 11(2) 46 12(1) 71 

‘Korveril’ syn Cadillac 3(1) 37 3(2) 24 4(1) 4 10(1) 50 

‘Korverpea’ syn 

Kleopatra 9(2) 9 11(2) 47 12(1) 71 

‘Korvestavi’ syn 

Sunny Sky 10(3) 11 11(3) 42 12(2) 69 

‘Korwilma’ syn 

Perfect Moment 6(1) 29 6(3) 36 7(3) 47 

‘Lavdoll’ syn 

Apricot Bouquet 7(2) 5 9(2) 40 10(1) 48 

‘Lavflush’ syn 

Double Date 11(3) 12 12(4) 57 

‘Lavglo’ syn 

Yellow Minijet 4(4) 23 5(4) 11 6(4) 53 6(2) 34 

‘Lavjack’ syn 

Orange Minijet 5(1) 25 6(3) 10 8(4) 50 6(2) 34 12(3) 57 

‘Lavquest’ 7(2) 6 9(4) 34 10(3) 54 10(3) 56 

‘Light Touch’ 9(2) 8 10(2) 49 11(1) 64 10(1) 50 

‘Lydiver’ 12(3) 12 

‘Macerupt’ syn 

Orana Gold 3(1) 37 3(2) 15 4(1) 4 

‘Macoborn’ syn 

Maggie Barry 8(1) 5 9(1) 25 9(4) 56 

‘Macoranlem’ syn 

Oranges And Lemons 9(2) 9 10(3) 39 11(2) 54 

‘Macspeego’ syn 

Candella 8(1) 6 10(3) 57 

‘Many Happy Returns’ syn 

Harwanted 6(2) 31 7(1) 25 8(1) 39 

‘Meibarke’ syn 

Debut Meillandina 3(1) 37 3(1) 23 3(4) 4 

‘Meiblonver’ syn 

White Majesty 6(4) 5 9(1) 26 9(4) 56 12(1) 73 

‘Meibonrib’ syn 

Magic Meidiland 9(2) 9 9(4) 35 10(3) 54 12(2) 71 

‘Meiburtri’ syn Luna 8(2) 5 10(4) 64 

‘Meicairma’ syn Courage 7(3) 6 9(4) 35 10(3) 54 12(2) 71 

‘Meicarsel’ syn 

Mascara Minijet 8(4) 7 9(3) 59 10(2) 58 

‘Meichevil’ 3(3) 26 3(4) 37 

‘Meichoiju’ syn 

City of Adelaide 5(3) 20 7(4) 13 8(3) 52 5(4) 35 


‘Meicitrem’ syn 

Lemon Sunblaze 9(4) 10 11(1) 36 11(4) 53 

‘Meicobuis’ 12(1) 13 

‘Meicofum’ 10(3) 11 11(3) 42 12(2) 69 

‘Meidalnu’ syn Mascara 6(4) 6 9(1) 26 9(4) 56 12(1) 73 

‘Meidanclar’ syn 

Candy Meillandina 5(1) 25 5(4) 16 6(4) 53 6(3) 46 

‘Meidarwet’ 10(4) 14 12(1) 73 

177



Notice 

Surrendered/ 

Revoked/ 

Refused 

‘Meideauri’ 10(4) 14 12(2) 71 

‘Meideuji’ syn Cassandre 6(4) 7 9(4) 35 10(3) 54 12(2) 71 

‘Meidiaplou’ 3(3) 26 3(4) 37 

‘Meidipser’ syn 

Bright Spot 8(2) 5 10(4) 65 

‘Meidrofal’ syn 

Happy Minijet 7(4) 6 9(3) 62 10(2) 58 12(3) 57 

‘Meiferjac’ syn 

Autumn Sunblaze 9(4) 10 11(1) 37 11(4) 53 

‘Meiflopan’ syn 

Alba Meidiland 4(4) 23 6(2) 11 7(4) 40 12(2) 71 

‘Meifrony’ syn 

Kalinka 90 3(3) 26 4(3) 7 5(3) 5 9(3) 74 

‘Meifruije’ syn 

Apricot Sunblaze 9(4) 10 11(1) 38 11(4) 53 

‘Meiglaspo’ syn 

Fragrance Sunblaze 9(4) 10 11(1) 39 11(4) 53 

‘Meiglassol’ syn 

Tropico Meillandina 6(2) 33 6(3) 39 7(3) 47 

‘Meigormon’ syn 

Maestro 7(3) 8 10(1) 50 

‘Meigovin’ syn 

Snow Meillandina 3(1) 37 3(1) 28 3(4) 4 10(4) 65 

‘Meigrolet’ syn 

Fragrant Minijet 8(4) 7 9(3) 60 10(2) 58 

‘Meigronurisar’ syn 

Climbing Gold Bunny 4(4) 22 6(1) 15 6(4) 53 12(2) 71 7(1) 33 

‘Meiguitan’ syn Marylin 8(2) 5 10(4) 49 11(3) 53 12(3) 57 

‘Meiguni’ syn Tequila 8(2) 5 10(4) 49 11(3) 53 

‘Meihatoil’ 10(4) 14 12(1) 73 

‘Meihauzrey’ syn 

Bright Minijet 11(3) 12 12(4) 58 

‘Meihoto’ syn 

Sammi Minijet 11(3) 12 12(4) 59 

‘Meihouba’ syn 

Message 91 6(4) 6 9(1) 27 9(4) 56 12(1) 73 

‘Meikanrou’ syn 

Rubina 9(1) 7 10(4) 50 11(3) 53 

‘Meijaudiair’ syn 

Aussie Gold 3(4) 38 4(3) 9 5(3) 5 

‘Meikister’ syn 

Trudy Mimi 6(4) 5 9(1) 28 9(4) 56 12(1) 73 

‘Meikrusa’ syn 

Arianna 85 2(3) 23 2(3) 10 3(2) 5 

‘Meilarac’ syn 

Bella Minijet 7(4) 6 9(3) 60 10(2) 58 

‘Meilarspo’ syn 

Dream Sunblaze 9(4) 10 11(1) 40 11(4) 53 

‘Meilipo’ syn 

Sweetlips Minijet 6(1) 29 6(3) 19 7(3) 48 

‘Meilivar’ syn 

Gina Lollobrigida 3(4) 38 3(4) 32 5(3) 5 12(2) 71 

‘Meilmera’ syn 

Bridal Sunblaze 9(4) 10 11(1) 41 11(4) 53 

‘Meimagul’ syn 

Gypsy Minijet 7(4) 6 9(3) 61 10(2) 58 

‘Meineble’ syn 

Red Meidiland 4(2) 23 6(2) 10 7(4) 40 12(2) 71 

‘Meinewkan’ syn 

Chin Chin 9(1) 7 10(4) 51 11(3) 53 

‘Meineyta’ syn Anita 8(2) 5 10(4) 52 11(3) 53 

‘Meininrut’ 10(4) 14 12(1) 73 

‘Meinivoz’ syn 

Spirit of Peace 7(3) 6 9(4) 37 10(3) 54 12(2) 71 

‘Meinochot’ syn 

178




Notice 

Surrendered/ 

Revoked/ 

Refused 

Crimson Minijet 5(1) 25 6(3) 10 7(3) 48 6(2) 34 

‘Meioffic’ syn 

Sweet Sonata 6(4) 7 9(4) 36 10(3) 54 12(2) 71 

‘Meipelta’ syn 

Fushia Meidiland 8(1) 6 9(4) 37 10(3) 54 12(2) 71 

‘Meiperol’ syn Fidelio 5(3) 19 5(4) 28 6(3) 6 9(3) 74 

‘Meipinjid’ syn 

Duke Meillandina 2(2) 30 2(2) 24 3(1) 4 10(1) 50 

‘Meipitac’ syn 

Carefree Wonder 5(3) 20 7(4) 12 8(3) 52 5(4) 35 


‘Meiplatin’ syn 

Pearl Meidiland 4(4) 23 6(1) 14 6(4) 53 12(2) 71 

‘Meiponal’ syn 

Sunny Meillandina 3(1) 37 3(1) 29 3(4) 4 10(4) 65 

‘Meipopul’ syn 

Coral Meidiland 5(4) 33 7(4) 14 8(3) 52 

‘Meiqualis’ 10(2) 13 11(3) 43 12(2) 70 

‘Meirevolt’ syn 

Golden Conquest 9(3) 11 11(1) 42 12(1) 71 11(1) 65 


‘Meirolour’ syn Concerto 2(3) 23 2(3) 10 3(2) 5 

‘Meiroudek’ syn 

Rosalina 9(1) 7 10(4) 53 11(3) 53 

‘Meiroupis’ 10(4) 14 12(2) 71 

‘Meirutral’ syn 

Prince Meillandina 3(1) 37 3(1) 31 3(4) 4 10(4) 65 

‘Meiselgra’ syn 

Pink Minijet 4(4) 23 5(4) 10 6(4) 52 6(2) 34 12(3) 57 

‘Meispreyo’ syn 

Golden Mimi 6(4) 5 9(1) 28 9(4) 56 12(1) 73 

‘Meitanet’ 10(2) 13 11(3) 44 12(2) 70 

‘Meitebros’ syn 

The Children’s 10(1) 10 11(1) 42 12(1) 71 12(2) 71 

‘Meitifran’ syn 

Baron Meillandina 3(1) 37 3(1) 25 3(4) 4 9(1) 37 

‘Meitinor’ 10(3) 11 11(2) 56 

‘Meitobla’ syn 

Simply Magic 6(4) 7 9(4) 37 10(3) 54 12(2) 71 

‘Meitoliel’ 10(4) 14 12(1) 73 

‘Meitonje’ syn 

Pretty Polly 5(3) 20 7(4) 11 8(3) 52 5(4) 35 


‘Meitosier’ syn 

Twilight Glow 8(1) 6 11(1) 43 12(1) 71 11(1) 65 


‘Meitralur’ syn 

Flame Meillandina 5(4) 17 5(4) 17 6(4) 53 6(3) 46 10(3) 56 

‘Meitune’ 10(4) 14 12(1) 73 

‘Meivamo’ syn 

Paris YSL 6(4) 5 9(1) 29 9(4) 56 12(1) 73 

‘Meivouplix’ syn Kabuki 2(3) 23 2(3) 13 3(2) 5 8(2) 31 8(3) 53 

‘Meivrofix’ syn Zurella 2(3) 23 2(3) 13 3(2) 5 8(2) 31 8(3) 53 

‘Meixemat’ 12(4) 13 

‘Meixerul’ syn 

Peach Meillandina 3(1) 37 3(1) 32 3(4) 4 

‘Meixtraflo’ syn Lutin 3(3) 26 4(3) 10 5(3) 5 9(3) 74 

‘Meizaipur’ syn Mischka 2(1) 14 2(3) 4 3(2) 5 9(2) 63 

‘Meizogrel’ syn 

White Minijet 4(4) 23 5(4) 10 6(4) 52 6(2) 34 

‘Melinda Gainsford’ syn 

Jacyap 7(1) 6 8(1) 32 8(4) 50 

‘Metset’ syn Cristian 8(2) 5 9(1) 37 

‘Michelle Joy’ syn 

Aroshrel 4(11) 24 4(3) 10 5(3) 6 10(3) 56 

179



Notice 

Surrendered/ 

Revoked/ 

Refused 

‘MK II’ 11(4) 12 

‘Morredfar’ syn 

Fairy Carpet 9(3) 11 11(4) 55 

‘My Sweet Honeycomb’ 10(2) 13 12(1) 50 12(4) 101 

‘Nano Nagle’ 10(4) 14 

‘Nirpeter’ 12(4) 13 

‘Nirpnufdeu’ 11(4) 12 

‘Nirpstrip’ syn Shiba 10(3) 11 12(2) 48 

‘Noafeuer’ syn Red 

Noack Groundcover 9(2) 9 10(2) 60 

‘Noamel’ syn Appleblossom 

Ground Cover 8(3) 7 9(2) 41 10(1) 49 9(1) 37 

‘Noare’ syn 

Red Ground Cover 10(4) 14 11(3) 45 12(2) 70 10(3) 56 

‘Noaschnee’ syn White 

Noack Groundcover 5(3) 18 6(3) 13 7(3) 47 5(4) 35 

‘Noala’ syn 

Coral Ground Cover 12(2) 14 

‘Noason’ syn 

Yellow Ground Cover 10(3) 11 11(3) 45 12(2) 70 10(3) 56 

‘Noatraum’ syn 

Pink Noack 

Groundcover 3(4) 38 5(2) 9 6(1) 7 5(4) 35 


‘Olijcrem’ 10(3) 11 11(3) 46 12(2) 70 12(2) 72 

‘Olijkroet’ 10(3) 11 11(2) 56 

‘Olympic Gold’† 

‘Olytel’ syn Super Disco 6(4) 6 

9(2) 62 

8(2) 31 

‘Onkaparinga’ 12(2) 15 

‘Paradise Heritage’ 8(4) 7 10(2) 49 11(1) 64 

‘Pekcoujenny’ syn 

First Red 5(4) 33 7(3) 18 11(4) 55 

‘Pink Bouquet’† 

‘Pink Iceberg’ 7(1) 7 8(1) 32 8(4) 50 

10(3) 56 

10(1) 50 

‘Pink Kardinal’ 7(2) 7 8(3) 44 9(2) 62 

‘Poulagun’ 12(4) 13 

‘Poulals’ syn 

Coral Parade 5(4) 32 8(3) 53 

‘Poulann’ syn 

QueenParade 5(4) 32 10(1) 33 10(4) 63 10(4) 64 

‘Poulari’ syn 

Karen Blixen 9(4) 10 11(4) 43 12(3) 56 11(4) 55 

‘Poulberin’ 12(4) 13 

‘Poulbero’ syn Solitude 8(1) 6 9(1) 30 9(4) 56 11(4) 55 

‘Poulcar’ syn 

Pink Parade 5(4) 32 8(3) 53 

‘Poulci’ syn 

Classic Parade 5(4) 33 10(1) 33 10(4) 63 10(4) 64 

‘Pouldace’ 12(4) 13 

‘Pouldra’ 12(4) 13 

‘Poulesta’ 12(3) 12 

‘Poulester’ syn 

Easter Parade 5(4) 32 8(3) 53 

‘Poulezy’ 12(3) 12 

‘Poulobe’ 12(3) 12 

‘Poulgrad’ 12(4) 13 

‘Poulhappy’ syn 

Charming Parade 11(1) 9 11(2) 47 12(2) 70 

‘Poulina’ syn 

Ballerina Parade 5(4) 32 8(3) 53 

‘Poulisab’ 12(4) 13 

‘Poullen’ syn 

Little Bo Peep 8(1) 6 9(1) 30 9(4) 56 

‘Poulmanti’ 12(4) 13 

‘Poulna’ 12(4) 14 

180




Notice 

Surrendered/ 

Revoked/ 

Refused 

‘Poulody’ 12(3) 12 

‘Pouloral’ syn 

Dreaming Parade 5(4) 33 10(1) 34 10(4) 63 10(4) 64 

‘Poulorin’ 12(4) 14 

‘Poulpear’ 12(4) 14 

‘Poulpollo’ 12(3) 12 

‘Poulsail’ 12(4) 14 

‘Poulsiana’ 12(4) 14 

‘Poulsolo’ 12(4) 14 

‘Poulvic’ syn 

Victory Parade 5(4) 33 10(1) 34 10(4) 63 10(4) 64 

‘Poulspor’ syn 

Royal Parade 5(4) 33 10(4) 64 

‘Poulstar’ syn 

Starlight Parade 5(4) 32 8(3) 53 

‘Poulvue’ syn 

Michael Crawford 8(1) 6 9(1) 30 9(4) 56 11(4) 55 

‘Poulyn’ 12(3) 12 

‘Poulzin’ 12(4) 14 

‘Prebian’ syn Bianca 8(2) 5 10(1) 32 11(1) 64 

‘Precious Michelle’ syn 

Macbucpal 4(1) 24 4(3) 12 5(3) 5 10(3) 56 

‘Pretaner’ 10(3) 11 12(2) 48 

‘Pretufo’ syn Charon 10(3) 11 11(4) 55 

‘Protem’ 11(1) 66 11(2) 56 

‘Quaker Star’ syn 

Dicperhaps 4(2) 23 4(2) 13 5(4) 5 8(4) 51 

‘Red Iceberg’ 12(4) 14 

‘Reflection’ 9(4) 10 

‘Remember All’ 4(2) 12 4(2) 12 

‘Rock & Roll’ syn 

Macfirwal 4(1) 24 4(3) 12 5(3) 6 10(3) 56 

‘Ruialex’ syn 

Red Festival 7(1) 9 9(2) 42 10(1) 49 

‘Ruicharm’ syn 

Charming Festival 7(1) 8 9(2) 42 10(1) 49 

‘Ruichris’ syn 

Sunny Cupido 7(1) 9 9(2) 43 10(2) 58 

‘Ruiconti’ synYellow Unique12(1) 13 

‘Ruidiggel’ syn 

Snowy Cupido 7(1) 8 9(2) 44 10(1) 49 

‘Ruidriko’ syn Vivaldi 5(4) 33 7(3) 17 8(2) 31 

‘Ruifire’ syn Fire Festival 7(1) 8 9(2) 44 10(1) 49 

‘Ruigal’ syn 

Milana Festival 7(1) 8 9(2) 45 10(1) 49 

‘Ruijoho’ syn 

Sunny Prophyta 9(2) 9 10(1) 34 10(4) 64 

‘Ruikuik’ syn 

Cream Prophyta 8(2) 5 10(1) 35 11(1) 64 

‘Ruioran’syn Orange Unique12(1) 13 

‘Ruipipi’ syn 

Joker Festival 7(1) 9 9(2) 46 10(1) 49 

‘Ruirodella’ syn 

Pink Festival 7(1) 8 9(2) 46 10(1) 49 

‘Ruirovingt’ syn 

Prophyta 7(1) 6 10(1) 35 11(1) 64 7(2) 29 

‘Ruizesac’ syn Astra 6(3) 44 7(3) 31 8(2) 31 6(4) 54 

‘San-Ka’ syn 

Enchantment 6(2) 31 7(1) 27 8(1) 39 9(1) 37 

‘Savaje’ syn 

Auria Meillandina 5(4) 18 5(4) 18 7(2) 28 6(3) 46 12(1) 73 

‘Savoy Hotel’ syn 

Harvintage 5(2) 16 5(2) 16 7(2) 28 

‘Schobitet’ 3(1) 37 3(1) 27 3(4) 4 9(1) 37 9(2) 63 

‘Schovian’ syn Viviane 8(2) 5 10(1) 37 11(1) 64 

181



Notice 

Surrendered/ 

Revoked/ 

Refused 

‘Seajulc’ syn 

Climbing Julia’s 9(2) 9 10(1) 50 

‘Selalu’ syn Dai 4(4) 22 6(1) 13 6(4) 54 9(1) 37 

‘Selargon’ syn 

Vicki Brown 4(4) 22 6(1) 10 6(4) 54 9(1) 37 

‘Selcarbonium’ syn 

Honesty 7(1) 6 10(1) 36 10(4) 64 

‘Selchroom’ syn Amarillo7(1) 6 10(1) 37 10(4) 64 

‘Selferr’ syn Shadow 4(4) 22 6(1) 10 6(4) 54 8(1) 39 8(4) 52 

‘Selhafnium’ syn Allure 7(1) 6 10(1) 37 10(4) 64 

‘Selnessee’ syn Selstar 5(1) 24 6(1) 12 6(4) 54 9(1) 37 

‘Selscandium’ syn 

Mini Champagne 7(1) 6 10(1) 36 11(1) 64 

‘Selspray’ syn Sprayer 4(4) 23 6(1) 11 6(4) 54 9(1) 37 

‘Seltitaan’ syn Marjan 4(4) 22 6(1) 13 6(4) 54 9(1) 37 

‘Sheer Bliss’ syn Jactro 5(1) 25 5(3) 6 6(2) 5 

‘Smooth Melody’ syn 

Hadmelody 7(1) 6 8(3) 45 9(2) 62 

‘Smooth Perfume’ syn 

Hadperfume 7(1) 6 8(3) 46 9(2) 62 

‘Smooth Prince’ syn 

Hadprince 7(1) 6 8(3) 47 9(2) 62 

‘Sommermelodie’ 8(3) 7 10(3) 56 

‘Sommermelodie’† 

‘Spekes’ syn Our Sacha 9(2) 9 10(3) 39 11(2) 54 

9(1) 37 

‘Spekra’ syn Our Rodeo 9(2) 9 10(2) 60 

‘Spevu’ syn Lovely Fairy 7(2) 5 10(1) 38 11(1) 65 

‘St Peters Rose’ syn Saints 12(2) 71 

‘Stebigpu’ syn Big Purple 3(2) 34 3(2) 16 4(1) 4 3(3) 26 

‘Sunauck’ syn 

Barossa Dream 8(1) 6 9(3) 63 10(2) 58 

‘Sundel’ syn Delilah 8(2) 5 10(1) 38 11(1) 65 

‘Sunlampo’ 12(4) 14 

syn Bellissima 

‘Sunlida’ 10(3) 11 

‘Sunluck’ 12(1) 13 

‘Sunmani’ syn 

Oasis Sunset 8(4) 7 9(3) 63 10(2) 59 

‘Sunpari’ 12(4) 14 

syn La Parisienne 

‘Sunpat’ syn Opal 8(1) 6 10(1) 38 10(4) 64 

‘Sunsalm’ syn Gem 8(1) 6 10(1) 39 10(4) 64 

‘Sunscent’ syn Scentasia 10(3) 11 12(2) 49 

‘Suntick’ syn 

Tickled Pink 8(1) 6 8(3) 48 9(2) 62 

‘Suntink’ syn Tinkerbell 6(1) 28 7(3) 18 8(3) 52 

‘Sunwend’ syn Wendy 6(1) 28 7(3) 18 8(2) 31 

‘Sunyel’ syn 

Little Nugget 8(2) 5 11(1) 66 

‘Tanadeepdac’ 11(2) 15 12(2) 50 

‘Tanafira’ 10(2) 13 11(2) 48 12(1) 71 

‘Tanakinom’ syn Monica 5(4) 35 7(1) 12 8(1) 39 

‘Taneitber’ syn 

Tantaus Bernstein 5(2) 16 5(2) 16 7(2) 28 6(1) 31 

‘Taneitber’ syn 

Tantaus Bernstein 6(2) 35 

‘Tanfudermos’ syn 

Summer Fragrance 4(2) 23 4(2) 13 5(4) 5 

‘Tanfudermos’ syn 

Summer Fragrance 6(2) 4 

‘Taniffest’ 10(2) 13 11(2) 49 12(1) 71 

‘Taniliram’ 11(2) 15 12(2) 51 

‘Tanireb’ syn 

Belle of Berlin 5(4) 35 10(4) 54 11(3) 53 

‘Tankalcig’ 10(2) 13 11(2) 49 12(1) 71 

182




Notice 

Surrendered/ 

Revoked/ 

Refused 

‘Tanledolg’ syn 

Peter Mac’s Gold Juwel 11(3) 12 

‘Tanmirsch syn 

Golden Touch 10(1) 10 

‘Tanmixa’ syn 

Joy of Life 10(2) 13 12(1) 51 

‘Tannollipa’ 11(2) 15 12(2) 52 

‘Tanschaubud’ syn 

Olde Fragrance 3(2) 34 3(2) 21 4(1) 4 

‘Tennessee’ 4(4) 23 6(1) 9 6(4) 54 

‘Tineke’ 3(4) 38 4(2) 6 5(1) 7 

‘Twoaebi’ 12(4) 14 

‘Twojoan’ 12(4) 14 

‘Twopaul’ 12(4) 14 

‘Twoyel’ 12(4) 14 

‘Victoria Gold’ 

syn Welgold 6(4) 8 9(2) 47 10(1) 49 9(2) 62 

‘Vision’† 

‘Wekamanda’ 9(4) 10 11(4) 44 12(3) 56 

10(2) 59 

10(4) 64 

‘Wekamanda’ syn 

St Patrick† 

‘Wekaq’ syn 

10(4) 64 

The Temptations 8(1) 6 9(1) 31 9(4) 56 

‘Wekblagab’ 10(2) 13 

‘Wekdykstra’ syn 

Rose of Narromine 11(3) 12 

‘Wekjoe’ syn 

Lynn Anderson 9(2) 9 10(3) 40 11(2) 54 

‘Wekmar’ syn 

Imagination 8(1) 6 9(1) 31 9(4) 56 

‘Wekplapep’ syn 

Scentimental 11(3) 12 

‘Wekplapic’ syn 12(4) 14 

Centenary of Federation 

‘Welpeach’ syn 

Veronica Kay 7(1) 5 8(2) 31 8(3) 53 

‘Welpink’ syn Muskstick 7(1) 5 9(2) 47 10(1) 49 

‘Welred’ syn 

Eric The Red 7(1) 5 9(2) 48 10(1) 49 9(3) 73 

‘White Flower Carpet’† 

‘White Simplicity’ syn 

5(4) 35 

Jacsnow 5(1) 25 5(3) 8 6(2) 5 

‘Woman’s Day’ syn 

Welira 5(3) 17 8(3) 49 9(2) 62 9(1) 37 

‘Yellow Noack 

Ground Cover’† 

‘Young At Heart’ 1(2) 14 1(2) 13 2(2) 4 

10(3) 56 

2(2) 31 

‘Yu Giri’ 7(2) 4 8(4) 51 8(2) 31 

rugosa 

‘Lily Freeman’ syn 

Huxl 1 9(2) 9 10(1) 39 10(4) 63 

Rosmarinus 

officinalis 

‘Renzels’ syn Irene 10(2) 13 12(3) 45 

‘Scentuous Blue’ 9(4) 10 10(4) 54 11(3) 53 

Saccharum 

hybrid 

‘76N749’† 10(2) 59 

‘77N330’† 

‘82C954’ 8(4) 7 

10(1) 50 

9(4) 57 

‘84N2330’† 10(2) 59 

‘84N2947’† 10(1) 50 

‘85S1552’† 10(1) 50 

183



Notice 

Surrendered/ 

Revoked/ 

Refused 

‘86A55’† 

‘Q163’ 8(4) 8 9(4) 45 10(3) 55 

10(2) 59 

‘Q165’ 8(4) 8 9(4) 46 10(3) 55 

‘Q166’ 8(4) 8 9(4) 47 10(3) 55 10(1) 50 

‘Q167’ 8(4) 7 9(4) 48 10(3) 55 10(1) 50 

‘Q168’ 10(1) 11 

‘Q169’ 10(1) 11 

‘Q170’ 8(4) 8 9(4) 49 10(3) 55 10(1) 50 

‘Q171’ 8(4) 8 9(4) 44 10(3) 55 10(2) 59 

‘Q172’ 8(4) 7 9(4) 42 10(3) 55 10(2) 59 

‘Q173’ 11(2) 15 12(2) 53 

‘Q174’ 8(4) 8 9(4) 43 10(3) 55 10(2) 59 

‘Q175’ 11(2) 15 12(2) 55 

‘Q176’ 12(2) 15 12(4) 67 


‘Q178’ 12(3) 12 12(4) 73 

‘Q179’ 12(3) 12 12(4) 75 





Santalum 

acuminatum 

‘Frahn’s Paringa Gem’ 9(2) 8 

‘Powell’s Number One’ syn 

Row 1 Tree 1 6(1) 27 

Santolina 

virens 

‘Lemon Fizz’ 7(4) 6 9(2) 19 10(1) 47 

Sanvitalia 

procumbens 

‘Pizzaro’s Button’ syn 

Stargazer 5(2) 35 7(1) 33 7(3) 49 

Sapium 

sebiferum 

‘Johan Harder’ 4(4) 23 8(3) 53 

Scabiosa 

columbaria 

‘Butterfly Blue’ syn 

Butterfly Blue (Beauty) 5(3) 18 5(4) 20 6(4) 53 10(2) 60 6(1) 32 

12(4) 102 6(2) 35 

‘Pink Mist’ 5(3) 18 5(4) 20 6(4) 53 10(2) 60 6(1) 31 

12(4) 102 6(2) 35 

‘Samanthas Pink’ 12(3) 12 

Scaevola 

aemula 

‘Blue Fandango’ 7(3) 6 10(2) 32 11(1) 63 8(1) 39 

‘Golden Fanfare’ 7(2) 8 8(3) 53 

‘Petite Cascade’ 5(3) 19 6(2) 24 7(1) 32 6(4) 54 10(1) 50 

8(4) 51 

‘Petite’† 

‘Purple Cascade’ 

6(4) 51 

9(3) 74 

‘Rhapsody’ 12(2) 11 

‘Royal Fanfare’† 

‘Summertime Blues’ 10(1) 10 10(1) 40 11(1) 63 

8(1) 39 

‘Sweet Serenade’ 12(2) 11 

phlebopetala 

‘No.33’ 12(1) 11 

184




Notice 

Surrendered/ 

Revoked/ 

Refused 

Schefflera 

arboricola 

‘Mme De Smet’ 8(1) 6 9(1) 31 9(4) 56 

heptaphylla 

‘Jungle Gem’ 12(2) 15 

Schlumbergera 

hybrid 

‘Bridgeport’ 2(4) 39 2(4) 30 3(3) 5 11(4) 55 

‘Cambridge’ 2(4) 39 2(4) 31 3(3) 5 11(4) 55 

‘Gold Fantasy’ syn 

Christmas Flame 2(4) 39 2(4) 34 5(1) 6 11(4) 55 

‘Orange Fantasy’ 2(4) 39 2(4) 35 3(3) 5 11(4) 55 

‘Santa Cruz’ 2(4) 39 2(4) 36 3(3) 5 11(4) 55 

truncata 

‘Aspen’ 7(3) 7 12(3) 50 

‘Christmas Fantasy’ 3(2) 34 3(2) 10 4(1) 4 11(4) 55 

‘Holiday Splendor’ 6(3) 44 10(4) 59 11(3) 53 

‘Pasadena’ 7(3) 7 10(4) 60 11(3) 53 

‘Sanibel’ 5(3) 19 7(2) 14 8(1) 38 11(4) 55 

‘Savannah’ 10(2) 15 12(3) 53 

‘Sleigh Bells’ 6(3) 44 10(4) 60 11(3) 53 

‘St. Charles’ 9(2) 6 12(3) 52 

‘Sunburst Fantasy’ 12(2) 15 

‘White Fantasy’ 11(2) 15 

‘Windsor’ 5(3) 19 7(2) 15 8(1) 38 11(4) 55 

truncata hybrid 

‘Lavender Fantasy’ syn 

Lavender Doll II 3(4) 38 3(4) 22 4(3) 6 11(4) 55 

‘Magic Fantasy’ syn 

Christmas Magic 11 3(4) 38 3(4) 22 4(3) 6 11(4) 55 

xreginae 

‘Carmen’ 8(4) 7 9(3) 65 10(2) 59 12(3) 57 

‘Madame Butterfly’ 1(3) 13 1(3) 7 2(2) 4 8(4) 51 


‘Mikado’ 8(4) 7 9(3) 66 10(2) 59 12(3) 57 

‘St Andrew’† 

‘Swan Lake’ 8(2) 6 9(3) 66 10(2) 59 

8(4) 51 

8(4) 51 


Scholtzia 

oligandra 

‘White Cascades’ 6(4) 7 9(2) 49 10(1) 49 11(1) 66 

Serruria 

florida 

‘Superb Blush’ 6(4) 7 8(1) 11 8(4) 49 

florida x rosea 

‘Sugar’n’spice’ 3(4) 38 3(4) 30 4(4) 4 

Sesamum 

indicum 

‘Aussie Gold’ syn 

Line 339 6(1) 28 7(1) 14 8(1) 39 

‘Beech’s Choice’ syn 

Line 91 6(1) 28 7(1) 13 8(1) 39 

‘Edith’ syn Y1:44 8(3) 7 9(3) 64 10(2) 59 

Setaria 

sphacelata 

‘Splenda’ 1(3) 13 1(3) 10 2(2) 4 

Simmondsia 

chinensis 

‘Barindji’ 3(1) 37 3(1) 14 3(4) 4 

185



Notice 

Surrendered/ 

Revoked/ 

Refused 

‘Wadi Wadi’ 4(4) 23 4(4) 19 6(1) 6 

‘Waradgery’ 3(1) 37 3(1) 14 3(4) 4 

Solanum 

rantonnetii 

‘Golden Robe’ 10(4) 10 11(4) 15 

tuberosum 

‘Argos’ 9(3) 11 12(3) 40 12(2) 71 

‘Azur’ 7(1) 7 10(1) 50 12(1) 73 


‘Celeste’ 10(2) 13 10(4) 46 12(2) 70 

‘Crop 3’† 

‘Crop 4’ 

10(3) 10 

11(4) 11 

11(2) 56 

‘Cycloon’ 11(4) 12 

‘Driver’ syn Crop 8† 

‘Driver’ syn Golden Delight11(4) 12 



‘FL 1867’ 12(4) 13 12(4) 49 

‘Forta’ 7(1) 7 10(1) 50 12(1) 73 


‘Gladiator’ 7(2) 6 8(1) 29 8(4) 50 12(4) 103 

‘Goldstar’ 10(1) 10 10(4) 41 12(2) 70 

‘HAV 84-3’† 

‘Heather’ 9(2) 8 11(1) 27 11(4) 52 



‘Hilite Russet’ 6(1) 28 6(3) 16 7(2) 28 11(1) 66 

‘Kan Chip’ 10(4) 14 11(1) 66 

‘Karlena’ 6(2) 32 10(2) 60 

‘Kestrel’ 8(3) 7 11(1) 27 11(4) 52 12(2) 71 

‘Lady Christl’ 11(4) 12 

‘Latona’ syn VDZ 83-60 10(1) 10 10(4) 43 11(3) 53 

‘Liseta’ 4(4) 23 5(4) 6 6(3) 6 12(2) 71 

‘Macrusset’ 10(3) 11 11(1) 66 

‘Maradonna’ 4(4) 23 5(4) 6 6(3) 6 12(1) 73 

‘Mondial’ 4(4) 23 5(4) 6 6(3) 6 12(2) 71 

‘Morene’ 1(3) 13 3(2) 6 5(1) 6 12(2) 71 3(4) 38 

‘Nadine’ 5(3) 18 7(4) 8 8(3) 52 12(2) 71 

‘Novita’ 8(4) 7 9(3) 45 10(3) 54 12(2) 71 

‘Pacific’ syn Crop 5 11(4) 11 

‘Panda’ 5(1) 25 5(3) 20 

9(2) 62 

‘Pepo’ 7(1) 7 10(1) 50 12(1) 73 


‘Platina’ 11(3) 11 12(2) 71 

‘Proloog’ 8(3) 7 8(4) 46 9(3) 73 12(1) 73 

‘Red Rascal’ 11(4) 40 12(3) 56 11(2) 56 

‘Redgem’ 9(3) 11 12(3) 41 12(2) 71 

‘Redstar’ 12(3) 12 

‘Remarka’ 8(3) 7 8(4) 46 9(3) 73 12(2) 71 

‘Riverina Russet’ 10(3) 11 11(1) 66 

‘Royal Blue’ 9(3) 11 10(4) 45 12(2) 70 

‘Ruby Lou’ 10(3) 11 11(1) 66 

‘RZ 85-618’† 

‘Saxon’ syn 81c 116-41 9(4) 10 11(1) 28 11(4) 52 


‘Shine’ 10(4) 14 11(1) 66 

‘Smith’s Astra’ 11(1) 8 12(1) 45 12(4) 100 

‘Smith’s Aurora’ 12(1) 12 12(1) 45 12(4) 100 

‘Smith’s Comet’ 12(1) 13 12(1) 46 12(4) 100 

‘Smith’s Orion’ 10(4) 13 12(1) 47 12(4) 100 

‘Smith’s Starlight’ 12(4) 13 

‘Smith’s Stellar’ 10(4) 13 12(1) 47 12(4) 100 

‘Snow Gem’ 6(3) 43 10(4) 64 11(1) 66 

‘St. Johns’ 9(2) 8 11(1) 30 12(1) 71 12(2) 71 

‘Symfonia’ syn 

‘Victoria’ 12(3) 12 

‘WAL 82-161 9(3) 11 10(4) 46 11(3) 53 

‘Valor’ 8(3) 7 11(1) 31 11(4) 52 12(2) 71 

186




Notice 

Surrendered/ 

Revoked/ 

Refused 

‘VDW 82-101’† 12(2) 70 

‘Wilwash’ 4(2) 23 4(2) 17 5(4) 5 6(1) 31 

‘Winlock’ 3(2) 34 3(2) 7 4(1) 4 11(1) 66 

‘Winston’ 8(3) 7 11(1) 31 11(4) 52 12(2) 71 

Sorghum 

bicolor var. sudanese 

‘WKM IV’ 10(4) 64 

Spathiphyllum 

floribundum x lechlerianum 

‘Leprechaun’ 6(4) 9 11(1) 45 11(4) 52 11(1) 66 

hybrid 

‘Bond A’ syn Symphony 7(3) 6 

‘Ceres Star’ syn H 506† 

‘Ceres’ syn Ceres Star 9(1) 6 12(3) 32 



‘Frederick’ syn SPFR 9(3) 11 12(1) 41 12(4) 100 

‘Gorgusis 1’ syn 

Sensation 4(4) 23 8(1) 28 9(1) 36 

‘Metalica’ syn Ara 70 8(1) 6 9(2) 34 10(1) 48 9(3) 74 

sp 

‘Sandra’ syn Sandra 6(2) 33 7(1) 23 8(1) 39 9(3) 73 

‘Tamborine Gold’ 6(2) 32 9(2) 62 

wallisii 

‘Caroline’ 5(1) 26 7(1) 9 8(4) 50 12(4) 103 

Spiraea 

japonica 

‘Walbuma’ 12(1) 13 

Sporobolus 

virginicus 

‘Nathus Green’ 10(2) 14 11(3) 47 

‘Ozlawn’ 12(4) 14 

Stenanthemum 

scortechinii 

‘White Mischief’ 5(2) 35 6(1) 24 7(1) 32 5(3) 21 

Stenotaphrum 

secundatum 

‘Sir Walter’ 9(4) 8 10(2) 24 11(1) 63 

‘SS100’ 9(3) 12 12(2) 26 

Stokesia 

cyanea 

‘Purple Parasols’ 12(1) 13 

Stylosanthes 

hamata 

‘Amiga’ 3(3) 26 3(3) 23 5(1) 7 

scabra 

‘Feira’ 3(4) 38 3(4) 34 4(4) 5 

‘Jecuipe’ syn Bahia 3(4) 38 3(4) 33 4(4) 5 4(1) 25 

‘Recife’ 3(4) 38 3(4) 33 4(4) 5 

sp. nov. aff. s. scabra 

‘Primar’ 9(3) 9 9(3) 19 10(2) 55 9(4) 57 

‘Unica’ 9(3) 9 9(3) 20 10(2) 55 9(4) 57 

Sutera 

cordata 

‘Bridal showers’ 12(4) 14 

‘Blizzard’ syn 

White Falls 9(3) 12 11(4) 45 

‘Eight Bells’ 9(3) 12 12(4) 102 

187



Notice 

Surrendered/ 

Revoked/ 

Refused 

‘Gold ‘n Pearls’ 12(4) 14 

‘Knysna Hills’ 9(3) 12 12(4) 102 

‘Lavender Showers 11(3) 12 

‘Lavender Storm’ 12(4) 14 

‘Pink Domino’ syn 

Mauve Mist 8(4) 8 9(1) 33 9(4) 56 9(2) 63 

‘Snow Flirt’ 10(2) 14 11(2) 56 

‘Star Whispers’ 10(2) 14 11(2) 56 

Syngonium 

podophyllum 

‘Gold Allusion’ 10(3) 10 12(1) 55 12(4) 101 

‘Holly M’ syn 

White Holly† 

‘Maria Allusion’ syn 


Cherry Allusion 12(1) 13 12(1) 56 12(4) 101 

‘Ultra’ 5(2) 35 6(1) 22 6(4) 53 8(3) 53 

‘White Holly’ 10(3) 10 12(1) 55 12(4) 101 12(4) 102 

Syzygium 

australe 

‘Aussie Boomer’ 10(4) 12 11(2) 26 12(1) 70 

‘Blaze’ 6(3) 45 7(3) 38 8(3) 52 7(3) 49 

‘Bush Christmas’ 8(2) 3 10(3) 20 

‘Elegance’ 12(3) 11 12(4) 47 

‘Tiny Trev’ 8(3) 5 9(1) 20 9(4) 56 

luehmannii 

‘Little Lucy’ 11(4) 12 

‘Petite Blush’ 9(4) 10 12(3) 28 

‘Royal Flame’ 10(3) 9 11(4) 55 

‘Sophie’ 8(4) 6 9(3) 74 

oleosum 

‘Amber Curls’ 9(1) 6 11(1) 17 11(4) 52 

paniculatum 

‘Lillyput’ 5(1) 25 6(1) 22 6(4) 53 5(2) 36 

‘Little Lil’ 11(3) 11 12(3) 27 

‘Undercover’ 6(4) 5 9(3) 33 11(1) 63 9(2) 62 

Tagetes 

hybrid 

‘Polynema’ 10(3) 10 12(2) 33 

Telopea 

speciosissima 

‘Cardinal’ syn Pope’s 

Weromba Cardinal 7(3) 7 9(4) 51 10(3) 55 8(2) 31 

‘Dreaming’ 8(2) 6 11(4) 47 

‘Fire ‘N Ice’ syn 

Fire and Ice 8(4) 8 9(4) 52 

‘Fire and Brimstone’ 7(2) 8 9(4) 51 10(3) 55 

‘In The Pink’ syn 

Number 359 8(2) 6 9(1) 37 

‘Shade Of Pale’ 8(4) 8 9(4) 52 10(3) 55 

‘Songlines’ syn No. 20 9(3) 12 11(4) 48 

‘Sunburst’ 3(3) 26 3(3) 16 5(2) 5 7(2) 29 

‘Sunflare’ 3(3) 26 3(3) 16 5(2) 5 

speciosissima x oreades 

‘Gembrook’ 12(1) 13 

188




Notice 

Surrendered/ 

Revoked/ 

Refused 

Themeda 

triandra 

‘Mingo’ 9(2) 7 10(2) 35 11(3) 52 

‘Tantangara’† 

‘Tangara’ 9(2) 7 10(2) 35 

11(1) 65 

11(1) 65 

Thinopyrum 

ponticum 

‘Dundas’ 10(2) 14 12(2) 58 10(4) 64 

Thryptomene 

calycina 

‘Ivory Lace’ 9(1) 7 10(3) 56 

Thuja 

occidentalis 

‘Star-Struck’ 9(3) 12 9(3) 66 10(2) 59 

Tibouchina 

organensis 

‘Totally Moonstruck’ 10(2) 12 11(2) 23 12(1) 69 

Torenia 

fournieri 

‘Sunrenilabu’ syn 

Blue magic 12(2) 15 12(2) 59 

Trifolium 

alexanderum 

‘Elite II’ 9(1) 4 12(1) 25 

ambiguum 

‘Endura’ syn KZ1 8(1) 3 8(3) 20 9(2) 61 

fragiferum 

‘Grasslands Onward’ 9(1) 7 9(2) 50 10(1) 49 

incarnatum 

‘Blaza’ 12(2) 11 12(4) 32 

michelianum 

‘Bolta’ 9(1) 5 10(2) 22 10(1) 50 11(2) 56 

‘Embal’† 

‘Frontier’ 12 (1) 10 



‘KRC -1’† 

pratense 

10(1) 50 

‘Astred’ 4(1) 23 5(4) 7 6(1) 7 

‘Grasslands Colenso’ 3(3) 26 3(3) 22 5(4) 3 

‘Grasslands G27’ syn 

G27 8(1) 5 8(1) 29 8(4) 50 

repens 

‘Clever Club’ 7(4) 7 9(1) 34 9(4) 57 9(2) 63 

‘Grasslands Bounty’ 12(4) 15 12(4) 90 

‘Grasslands Challenge’ syn 

G23 8(2) 6 9(1) 35 10(2) 59 

‘Grasslands Demand’ syn 

G26 6(1) 29 6(3) 22 7(3) 48 

‘Grasslands Kopu’ 2(2) 31 2(2) 28 4(3) 6 

‘Grasslands Prestige’ syn 

G39 6(1) 29 6(3) 21 7(3) 48 

‘Grasslands Nusiral’ 12(2) 15 12(2) 65 

‘Grasslands Sustain’ 8(2) 6 9(1) 35 10(1) 49 

‘Grasslands Tahora’ 2(2) 31 2(2) 28 3(2) 5 

‘Prop’ syn WEF 6(4) 6 6(4) 50 7(4) 40 

‘Tillman 2’† 

‘Tillman II’ 9(3) 12 10(1) 45 11(1) 65 

10(1) 50 

10(1) 50 10(2) 60 

‘Waverley’ 8(1) 6 10(3) 50 11(2) 53 

189



Notice 

Surrendered/ 

Revoked/ 

Refused 

resupinatum 

‘Kyambro’ 2(2) 30 2(2) 17 3(1) 4 

‘Lightning’ 10(4) 14 

‘Morbulk’ 10(4) 14 

‘Nitro Plus’ 10(1) 10 10(4) 36 

‘Persian Prolific’ 10(1) 10 10(4) 37 

resupinatum var majus 

‘Laser’ 8(1) 5 12(1) 44 

‘Leeton’ 8(1) 5 12(1) 44 

subterraneum 

‘Breeding Line Khan 7.6’9(3) 12 11(1) 66 

‘Denmark’ 4(4) 23 4(4) 18 6(3) 6 

‘Gosse’ 5(4) 34 7(1) 13 8(1) 39 

‘Goulburn 4(4) 23 4(4) 19 6(3) 6 

‘Leura’ 4(2) 27 4(2) 7 6(1) 5 

‘Riverina’ syn 76y51-31 8(3) 8 9(1) 33 9(4) 56 9(2) 63 

9(4) 57 

10(1) 51 

‘Rosedale’ 2(2) 30 2(2) 18 3(3) 6 

‘York’ 6(4) 9 7(3) 41 9(1) 36 

‘SE003’ 11(4) 12 

subterraneum spp brachycalycinum 

‘Nuba’ 3(1) 37 3(1) 11 4(1) 4 3(3) 26 

4(1) 25 

vesiculosum 

‘Arrotas’ 9(4) 8 11(3) 14 12(1) 73 

‘Cefalu’ 10(3) 9 12(2) 24 12(4) 102 

xTriticosecale 

‘Abacus’ 5(1) 17 5(1) 17 6(1) 5 5(2) 36 

‘Credit’ syn Ox83-50 10(2) 14 11(1) 47 11(4) 53 

‘Heritage Zephyr’ 11(2) 15 12(1) 58 12(4) 101 12(2) 72 

‘Maiden’ 6(2) 31 12(2) 60 

‘Treat’ 11(1) 9 11(1) 47 11(4) 53 

‘Packy’ 10(1) 50 

Triticum 

aestivum 

‘Ajana’ syn 

WAWHT2127 11(3) 12 12(1) 61 12(4) 101 

‘Anlace’ 12(2) 15 

Amery’ syn 81y:971 6(4) 9 7(4) 26 10(4) 63 

‘Arnhem’ syn QT4229 9(3) 12 10(3) 45 11(2) 55 

‘Arrino’ 10(2) 14 11(1) 48 11(4) 53 12(1) 72 

‘Baxter’ syn QT6258 Res 10(4) 15 10(4) 55 11(3) 53 

‘Brennan’ 11(3) 12 12(1) 62 12(4) 101 

‘Brookton’ 10(2) 14 11(1) 49 11(4) 53 12(1) 72 

‘Calingiri’ 10(2) 14 11(1) 50 11(4) 53 12(1) 72 

‘Carnamah’ syn 

WAWHT1380 9(4) 11 10(1) 42 10(4) 63 

‘Camm’ syn 

WAWHT2088 11(3) 12 12(2) 65 

‘Cascades’ syn 84z:1156 8(2) 6 9(4) 53 10(4) 63 

‘Cunderdin’ syn 

WAWHT1379 9(4) 11 10(1) 43 10(4) 63 10(2) 60 

‘Datatine’ syn 84w:1147 8(2) 6 9(4) 53 10(4) 63 

‘Galaxy H45’† 

‘H45’ 11(2)13 12(3) 50 




‘Dennis’ 12(4) 15 12(4) 89 

‘Giles’ syn QT6581 10(4) 15 10(4) 56 11(4) 53 

‘Goldmark’ syn VF 508 9(2) 10 10(2) 52 11(1) 65 9(4) 57 

10(1) 50 

10(4) 64 

‘Gordon’ syn RRL 31 10(2) 15 11(1) 51 11(4) 53 

190




Notice 

Surrendered/ 

Revoked/ 

Refused 

‘Kalannie’ syn 

WAWHT1426 9(4) 11 10(1) 44 10(4) 64 

‘Karlgarin’ 12(4) 15 

‘Kennedy’ syn QT6063 9(4) 11 10(3) 48 11(2) 55 

‘Krichauff’ 10(2) 14 11(3) 54 

‘Lang’ 12(4) 15 

‘Lawson’ 4(2) 23 4(4) 10 5(3) 6 

‘Mawson’ syn QT7274 9(3) 12 10(3) 48 11(2) 55 

‘Monad’ 9(3) 12 11(1) 52 12(1) 72 

‘Nyabing’ 10(2) 14 11(1) 53 11(4) 54 12(1) 72 

‘Paterson’ syn 

B173 Paterson 8(4) 8 9(2) 59 10(1) 49 

‘Pelsart’ syn QT4639 6(4) 6 7(4) 23 9(1) 36 9(2) 63 

‘Perenjori’ syn 

WAWHT1308 9(4) 11 10(1) 44 10(4) 64 

‘Petrie’ 12(4) 15 

‘QT5793’ 9(3) 12 10(3) 49 11(2) 55 

‘Rowan’ syn QT4636 6(4) 6 7(4) 23 8(3) 53 

‘Silverstar’ syn VF664 9(2) 10 10(2) 52 11(1) 65 9(3) 73 

10(4) 64 

10(1) 50 

‘Stiletto’ syn RAC 680 7(1) 5 10(3) 49 11(2) 55 12(4) 103 

‘Stretton’ syn 80y:1117 6(4) 9 7(4) 25 10(4) 64 7(2) 29 

‘Sturt’ syn QT6285 9(4) 11 10(3) 50 11(2) 55 

‘Sunbrook’ syn Sun 224a 9(2) 9 10(4) 57 11(3) 53 10(4) 64 

‘Sunland’ syn Sun 155c 9(2) 9 10(4) 57 11(3) 53 10(4) 64 

‘Sunstate’ syn Sun 148l 6(2) 34 10(4) 57 11(3) 53 10(4) 64 

‘Sunvale’ syn Sun 146 F 9(2) 9 10(4) 58 11(3) 53 10(4) 64 

‘Tammin’ syn 81w:1138 8(2) 6 9(4) 54 10(4) 64 

‘Tasman’ syn Qt4546 6(4) 6 7(4) 24 8(3) 53 

‘Tennant’ 11(3) 12 12(1) 62 12(4) 101 

‘Ure’ 9(1) 7 9(3) 73 10(1) 50 

‘Westonia’ 10(2) 14 11(1) 54 11(4) 54 12(1) 72 

‘WW2449’ 12(4) 15 

‘Wylah’ 12(4) 15 

‘Yanac’ syn VF 302 9(2) 10 10(2) 53 11(1) 65 10(1) 50 

10(4) 64 

turgidum subsp durum 

‘4210.23.6’ 12(4) 11 

‘Arrivato’ 12(4) 11 

‘Kronos’ syn Do3-21 8(1) 6 

‘Tamaroi’ 10(4) 11 

‘Wollaroi’ syn 880096 6(2) 32 9(1) 14 9(4) 55 

Ulmus 

parvifolia 

‘Emer I’ syn Emerald Isle10(4) 11 11(1) 66 

Urochloa 

mosambicensis 

‘Saraji’ 10(1) 11 10(1) 41 10(4) 63 10(4) 64 

Verbena 

hybrid 

‘Sunmariba’ syn 

Violet Surprise 12(2) 15 12(3) 48 

‘Sanmaripi’ syn 

Pink Profusion 9(1) 7 10(3) 40 11(2) 54 10(3) 56 9(2) 63 

11(2) 56 

‘Sunmaririho’ syn 

White Sensation 12(2) 15 12(3) 47 

‘Sunmariripi’ syn 

Coral Pink 12(2) 15 12(3) 48 

‘Sanmarisu’ syn 

191



Notice 

Surrendered/ 

Revoked/ 

Refused 

Scarlet Fire 9(1) 7 10(3) 41 11(2) 54 10(3) 56 

11(2) 56 

‘Sunmarefu TP-L’ syn 

Lilac Reflections 8(4) 8 10(3) 44 11(2) 56 


‘Suntory TP-L’ syn 

Lilac Reflections† 

‘Sunmarefu TP-P’ syn 


Pink Passion 8(4) 8 10(3) 44 11(2) 56 


‘Suntory TP-P’ syn 

Pink Passion† 

‘Sunmarefu TP-V’ syn 


Purple Passion 8(4) 8 10(3) 44 11(2) 56 


‘Suntory TP-V’ syn 

Purple Passion† 

‘Sunmarefu TP-W’ syn 


White Lightning 8(4) 8 10(3) 45 11(2) 56 


‘Suntory TP-W’ syn 

White Lightning† 12(2) 70 

‘Suntory VP-10’† 10(3) 56 

‘Suntory VP-13’† 10(3) 56 

Viburnum 

tinus 

‘Anvi’ syn Spirit 10(3) 9 11(4) 27 

Vicia 

ervilia 

‘Cazar’ 10(1) 8 11(1) 65 

faba 

‘Ascot’ 9(1) 5 10(2) 33 

‘Barkool’ 8(1) 3 10(2) 33 11(1) 63 

‘Deep Purple’ 11(4) 10 

‘Fiesta VF’ 10(4) 11 12(2) 28 

‘Icarus’ 7(1) 5 7(4) 7 8(3) 52 

‘Taranto’ 9(1) 5 12(1) 26 12(2) 72 

narbonensis 

‘Tanami’ 12(3) 11 

‘Morava’ 12(1) 11 12(4) 32 12(2) 71 

sativa 

‘SCO 5072’ 9(1) 7 10(4) 64 

‘Vedura’ 10(4) 11 11(4) 20 

‘Velero’ 9(1) 7 11(4) 21 10(4) 64 

‘Vestar’ 10(4) 11 11(4) 21 

villosa 

‘Haymaker Plus’ 10(4) 15 11(4) 50 

villosa ssp dasycarpa 

‘Capello’ 9(1) 7 11(4) 50 

Vigna 

radiata 

‘Black Pearl’ 7(2) 7 7(3) 43 8(2) 31 

‘Emerald’ syn 109900 6(1) 27 6(3) 15 7(3) 48 

‘Green Diamond’ syn 

HS23 10(2) 12 10(2) 39 11(3) 52 

unguiculata 

‘Big Buff’ syn 96963 6(1) 28 6(3) 17 7(3) 48 6(2) 35 

‘Ebony PR’ syn Line 4a 9(4) 8 9(4) 25 10(3) 53 10(3) 56 

‘Holstein’ syn C3-5-1 6(1) 28 6(3) 17 7(3) 48 12(3) 57 

192




Notice 

Surrendered/ 

Revoked/ 

Refused 

Viola 

hederacea 

‘White Angel’ 6(1) 27 8(4) 51 9(4) 57 

9(1) 37 

hybrid 

‘Major Primrose’ 12(4) 102 

Vitis 

vinifera 

‘A871’† 12(1) 73 

‘B891’† 

‘BW 41/5’ 9(1) 5 


10(3) 56 

‘BW 41/131’ 11(1) 8 

‘C990’† 

‘Cienna’ 10(4) 11 11(3) 48 



‘Cygne Blanc’ 10(2) 12 11(2) 51 12(2) 68 11(3) 54 

‘D1056’† 

‘Gold Seedless’ 12(1) 13 


‘HBS 17-35’ syn 

Stanley Seedless 9(2) 7 10(3) 56 

‘King Husainy’ syn 

Jade Seedless 4(4) 23 9(1) 17 9(4) 55 

‘Malian’ 12(3) 13 

‘Moss’ syn Moss Early 1(4) 23 3(4) 5 6(1) 6 3(4) 38 

‘Ralli Seedless’ 5(4) 34 9(1) 17 9(4) 55 

‘Red Rob Seedless’ 

syn BFS 3-37 10(3) 9 

‘Ribarits Red Seedless’ 11(2) 15 

‘Rubienne’ 10(4) 11 11(3) 49 12(1) 73 

‘SC 16/131’ 11(3) 12 

‘Shalistin’ 10(2) 12 

‘Sugrafive’ 4(3) 26 10(2) 59 

‘Sugraone’ 4(3) 26 10(2) 59 

‘Tyrian’ 10(4) 11 11(3) 49 12(1) 73 

‘Vermillion’ 10(4) 11 11(3) 49 12(1) 73 

Wahlenbergia 

stricta 

‘Bonnie Blue’ 9(3) 12 12(1) 73 

Weigela 

‘Plangen’ 11(1) 9 11(4) 49 12(3) 56 12(4) 103 

Xanthostemon 

chrysanthus 

‘Tropic Splendor’ 5(1) 24 5(1) 24 6(1) 5 

Zoysia 

japonica 

‘El Toro’ 5(3) 18 

193



Cumulative Index for Register of Australian 

Winter Cereal Cultivars Volumes 11(2) - 


Legend: PVJ Vol (No) page number 

Genus/species/variety 

Description 

Avena 

sativa 

‘Eurabbie’ 12(3) 80 

‘Glider 11(3) 71 

‘Numbat’ 11(3) 71 

‘Nu Gene’ syn ND 9308572 12(1) 10 

‘Quoll’ 11(3) 72 

‘Targa’ 12(3) 11 

Hordeum 

vulgare ssp. vulgare 

‘Picola’ 11(3) 80 

‘Wyalong’ 12(3) 79 

‘Yambla’ 12(3) 80 

Secale 

cereale 

‘Bevy’ 11(2) 75 

Triticum 

aestivum ssp. aestivum 

‘Anlace’ 12(2) 15 

‘Chough’ 11(2) 76 

‘Diamondbird’ 11(2) 76 

‘Hybrid Apollo’ 11(2) 77 

‘Hybrid Gemini’ 11(2) 78 

‘Hybrid Mercury’ 11(2) 79 

‘Snipe’ 11(2) 79 

‘Whistler’ 12(3) 81 

Triticum 

turgidum ssp. durum 

‘Tamaroi’ 11(2) 81 

194

SERVICE DIRECTORY 

WARATAH SEED CO. LTD. 

The Seed Professionals 

Broadacre Crop Seed Specialists 

All Members NSW Registered Cereal Growers 

Will Licence, Sub Licence or Contract grow your 

varieties under Internal, 

Registered or Certified Schemes 

Professional Seedgrowers with 

strong affiliations Australia wide 

“We are ready to grow” 

Contact: 

Chairman Hugh Roberts, Phone (02) 6942 1184 

Fax (02) 6942 3337 

Secretary Bill Freebairn, Phone or Fax (02) 6864 3211 

For assistance regarding Plant Breeders Rights and Trade Marks, 

please contact any of the following 

Melbourne Sydney Brisbane Perth 

Dr Vivien Santer Mr John Terry Peter Williams R. Van Wollingen 

(Plant Breeders Rights) 

Ann Makrigiorgos 

(Trade Marks) 

Telephone (03) 9243 8300 (02) 9957 5944 (07) 3221 7200 (08) 9221 3779

ADVERTISE YOUR NEW VARIETY 

OR SERVICES 

IN THE 


Journal 

Plant Breeders and their agents are invited to take this opportunity to promote their new plant 

varieties by advertising in the Plant Varieties Journal. Consultant Qualified Persons are also 

invited to advertise their services. The Journal is well circulated throughout the horticultural and 

agricultural industry. Advertising in the Journal will promote the commercialisation of new plant 

varieties and the services offered by the qualified persons. Our policy is to promote the varieties which 

are currently in the PBR scheme and the services of those who are currently accredited by the PBR 

office. 

The Journal also has a Service Directory. This Directory is suitable for advertising the services provided 

by Consultant Qualified Persons, Agents, Patent Attorneys, CTC sites or photographers. 

Advertising is available at a casual space rate as well as a four times rate, attracting a considerable 

discount of 25%! Advertisements will be published on the back cover or inside front and back covers. 

The front cover is restricted to full colour photographs of a PBR variety. 

Advertising Rates 

Casual 

4 issues 

Front Cover Colour $1100.00 $3300.00 

Back Cover (Full Page only) Colour 825.00 2475.00 

(Full Page only) Mono 550.00 1650.00 

Inside Front Cover (Full Page) Mono 440.00 1320.00 

(Half Page) Mono 275.00 825.00 

Inside Back Cover (Full Page) Mono 330.00 990.00 

(Half Page) Mono 220.00 660.00 

Service Directory (6cm x 6cm) Mono 55.00 per spot 

For bookings or further information please contact Kathryn Dawes-Read on 02 6272 4228, fax 02 6272 3650 or email 

Kathryn.Dawes-Read@affa.gov.au

PLANT BREEDER’S RIGHTS ADVISORY 

COMMITTEE 

The Plant Breeder’s Rights Advisory Committee (PBRAC) was established under the 

Plant Breeder's Rights Act 1994 (PBRA) to provide advice regarding the Act to the 

Minister of Agriculture Fisheries and Forestry and to the Registrar of the Plant 

Breeder’s Rights Office. 

Nominations are invited from interested persons with appropriate qualifications and experience to serve on the 

PBRAC representing the following sectors: 

• breeders, and likely breeders, of new plant varieties 

• users, and likely users, of new plant varieties 

• consumers, and likely consumers, of new plant varieties or of the products of new plant varieties 

• others with appropriate qualifications or experience. 

Nominations must include the nominee's full name, address, relevant biographical detail, experience and 

qualifications with respect to the sector they seek to represent. A letter of support from the sector the person 

represents should accompany the nomination. Nominees should also include a declaration regarding the absence of 

any conflict of interest and the propriety of their financial and taxation affairs. 

Membership of the PBRAC is not a salaried position. Members’ travel expenses are reimbursed and allowances paid 

at Remuneration Tribunal rates for attendance at meetings, normally held twice annually in Canberra. 

Details of the PBRA and of the Plant Breeder’s Rights scheme can be found at websites www. austlii.edu.au and 

www.affa.gov.au/agfor/pbr/pbr.html. Matters relating to the PBRAC are specified under sections 63-67 of the 

PBRA. 

Closing date for nominations is 25 February 2000. 

Please address nominations, 

marked confidential, to: 

The Registrar 


Department of Agriculture Fisheries and Forestry 

GPO Box 858 

Canberra ACT 2601 

Facsimile (02) 6272 3650

9 771030 974128 

04

54. Volume 12- Number 4 - IP Australia

You also want an ePaper? Increase the reach of your titles

Delete template?

Save as template?