21.02.2013 Views

UK mantis forums newsletter

UK mantis forums newsletter

UK mantis forums newsletter

SHOW MORE
SHOW LESS

Create successful ePaper yourself

Turn your PDF publications into a flip-book with our unique Google optimized e-Paper software.

<strong>UK</strong> Mantis Forums Newsletter<br />

Issue 6<br />

January 2012<br />

The winning picture in the August POTM. Fourth instar Deroplatys lobata by Sulasula<br />

www.uk<strong>mantis</strong><strong>forums</strong>.co.uk founded in August 2008 by Andie Johnson<br />

Editor: Gillian Higgins<br />

Forum Owner: Andie Johnson<br />

Section Moderator: Cain Eyre. Forum Advisers: Rob Byatt, Stefan Engelhardt, Chun<br />

Siew, Gary Symes.<br />

Forum Moderators: Lynne Dunning and Craig Smith<br />

Forum Administrator: Gillian Higgins<br />

Forum Statistics: 29 th December 2011. Members: 1,855, Active Members: 256


Editorial<br />

Gillian Higgins<br />

<strong>UK</strong>MF Newsletter issue 6<br />

For the forum there is an exciting year ahead as the software was upgraded in October and<br />

now also includes a content management system (CMS). The forum upgrade was a success<br />

and painless thanks to Andie Johnson’s planning and hard work. The CMS will give forum<br />

members the ability to organise and share information on <strong>mantis</strong>es in an easily accessible<br />

way.<br />

I am very pleased that for this issue of the <strong>newsletter</strong> Stefan Engelhardt has written a<br />

detailed guide to keeping the Malaysian Dead Leaf Mantis (Deroplatys desiccata). This large<br />

and impressive species is popular in culture appearing in the top ten of the species kept in<br />

culture list (Newsletter no. 5). Stefan has kept this species for around 2 years. Currently his<br />

first generation adults are in the process of mating and ooth laying. (The first generation is<br />

the progeny from a first breeding but is sometimes confused with the parents which are<br />

generation zero.).<br />

Inbreeding issues have arisen on the forum on a few occasions and have always resulted in<br />

heated discussions as this is a complex and difficult issue. Chun Siew has written an article<br />

on inbreeding and how it relates to <strong>mantis</strong> keeping that helps us understand why this is such<br />

a controversial issue.<br />

For the New Year we have an article on caring for new nymphs by Kirobella. This detailed<br />

piece shares Kirobella’s many years of breeding experience and contains details of interest<br />

to more experienced keepers as well as providing a good start for new keepers.<br />

Over the past year members have entered breeding reports into a thread and these have<br />

been summarised for this issue of the <strong>newsletter</strong>. I think the collection of reports of matings<br />

and hatchings and the details, particularly hatch number, has been very successful. I hope<br />

that this will continue in 2012. A finding that is a possible cause for considerable concern is<br />

that Thesprotia graminis might be having difficulty being maintained in culture (see page 18).<br />

The problem could be due to special breeding conditions required by the species or to an<br />

inbreeding ‘bottleneck’. I hope that members with this species might get together to discuss<br />

if there is a problem and what can be done. Nico has submitted a breeding report for the<br />

<strong>newsletter</strong> for Thesprotia graminis including records from an unfertilised ootheca. I have a<br />

particular interest in reports of parthenogenesis and this report adds to the only other report<br />

in this species.<br />

Andie Johnson is developing a species database for reports. This will be a unique database<br />

as it will be the only one where members’ records can be combined for each species in<br />

culture. This will be a long term project that will hopefully get underway in 2012. I believe that<br />

with our large active membership and the number of members who keep records, or are<br />

happy to note stages and sizes of the species they keep, it will develop to be a useful ‘one of<br />

a kind’ resource for <strong>mantis</strong> keepers.<br />

For the end of the year I have compiled what I believe is a fairly comprehensive list of<br />

abstracts from 2011 Mantodea related published literature and a forum digest.<br />

1<br />

www.uk<strong>mantis</strong><strong>forums</strong>.co.uk


<strong>UK</strong>MF Newsletter issue 6<br />

Captive Husbandry of Deroplatys desiccata, the<br />

Giant Dead Leaf Mantis<br />

Stefan Engelhardt<br />

Scientific classification<br />

Kingdom: Animalia<br />

Phylum: Arthropoda<br />

Class: Insecta<br />

Order: Mantodea<br />

Family: Mantidae<br />

Genus: Deroplatys<br />

Species: Deroplatys desiccata<br />

Common names: Giant Dead Leaf Mantis, Malaysian Dead Leaf Mantis<br />

Distribution: Malaysian Peninsula, Sumatra, Java, Borneo<br />

Natural habitat: tropical rainforest, damp areas, on ground with dead foliage, bushes<br />

According to Ehrmann (2002) 11 different Deroplatys species are known; these can all be<br />

found in Southeast-Asia. Just four of them are established in culture (more or less<br />

successfully captive bred): D. desiccata, D. lobata, D. truncata and D. trigonodera.<br />

Adult female Deroplatys desiccata. Photograph by Cain Eyre<br />

Deroplatys desiccata, also known as the Giant Dead Leaf Mantis, is a large sized <strong>mantis</strong>.<br />

Adult females reach up to 10 cm and the adult males have very long wings making their<br />

adult size 7-8 cm. These long wings allow males to develop into extremely skilful fliers.<br />

2<br />

www.uk<strong>mantis</strong><strong>forums</strong>.co.uk


<strong>UK</strong>MF Newsletter issue 6<br />

An impressive threat display, bizarre and dead foliage-mimicking appearance together with<br />

high aggressiveness towards prey animals make this species a valuable addition to any<br />

<strong>mantis</strong> keeper’s/breeder’s collection. The most characteristic body part by which the different<br />

Deroplatys species can be distinguished is the large pronotum. Deroplatys desiccata is<br />

considered to be the easiest species of the genus Deroplatys to keep and breed, but some<br />

experience in <strong>mantis</strong> keeping will prove to be advantageous. My Deroplatys desiccata stock<br />

is derived from IGM15 and at the moment I keep several adults of my first generation. In this<br />

little caresheet I will present information about successful husbandry of this beautiful species<br />

and I will include my observations and advice in order to show that, given proper conditions,<br />

Deroplatys desiccata is one of the most rewarding <strong>mantis</strong> species.<br />

Ootheca incubation<br />

Some days after being laid the ooth should be carefully removed from the female’s<br />

enclosure. From plastic surfaces they can be easily detached. It is more difficult when they<br />

are laid onto mesh or bark. In this case the best you can do is to transfer the ooth together<br />

with the mesh/bark into the hatching box. I have used 350 ml (12 fl. oz.) plastic cups with<br />

mesh on the top onto which I have glued the ooth. Wet kitchen towel on the bottom supports<br />

a constant humidity which should also be increased by daily misting. For Deroplatys sp. it<br />

cannot be emphasised enough that a too low humidity will result in a non-hatching ooth.<br />

After incubating the ooth over a period of 40-50 days between 27-30 o C (and a drop to<br />

approximately. 20 o C during the night) a minimum of 30 nymphs and up to 60 nymphs will<br />

hatch. Unlike hatchlings of other species that hang from a thread, Deroplatys desiccata<br />

nymphs shed their pre-nymphal skin immediately after emerging from the ooth, which<br />

explains why ooths are laid sometimes at ground level on dead leaves or bark openings.<br />

High humidity will also avoid nymphs becoming stuck during hatching. Compared to lots of<br />

other species, the hatch itself doesn’t happen in the morning: According to my observation<br />

nymphs hatch between early and late afternoon (this might be explained by their origin: the<br />

rainforest, their natural habitat, offers the best conditions for hatching in terms of humidity in<br />

the afternoon due to the daily rain).<br />

Left: Deroplatys desiccata hatching; middle: 350 ml cup; right: 600 ml cup.<br />

Photographs by Stefan Engelhardt<br />

3<br />

www.uk<strong>mantis</strong><strong>forums</strong>.co.uk


<strong>UK</strong>MF Newsletter issue 6<br />

Nymph care<br />

First instar nymphs are comparably big, so they should be fed with Drosophila hydei fruit<br />

flies which they will take already one day after hatching. Interestingly, the characteristic<br />

pronotum is already obvious at this early developmental stage. The most important<br />

parameters one has to consider during nymphal development are ventilation and humidity. It<br />

is crucial to provide an enclosure that ensures high ventilation as very young nymphs can<br />

die very quickly in a damp environment. It is not enough to put mesh just on the ceiling, at<br />

least one side should be permeable to air. Since 1 st instar nymphs are not that aggressive to<br />

each other (given a good supply of fruit flies), I keep hatchlings together in BraPlast-Boxes,<br />

185x185x190 mm (LxWxH):<br />

4<br />

www.uk<strong>mantis</strong><strong>forums</strong>.co.uk<br />

BraPlast-Box for keeping hatchlings<br />

or older instars. Photograph by Stefan<br />

Engelhardt<br />

Wet kitchen towel on the bottom ensures<br />

a constant humidity which is increased<br />

every night by misting (I have used also<br />

vermiculite and was very satisfied with it.)<br />

This misting also serves as freshwater<br />

source: Young and also older instars<br />

often drink from water drops on<br />

branches, mesh or walls. For decoration<br />

and climbing support I provide willow<br />

branches and raffia (the latter has to be<br />

changed regularly along with the kitchen<br />

towel due to mould). The kitchen towel<br />

might also serve as a cushion for<br />

nymphs that fall during moulting.<br />

After about 2 weeks the nymphs moult the first time. It has to be noted that Deroplatys sp. in<br />

general do not grow quickly, especially the sub adult stage can last up to 2 months. From 2 nd<br />

instar on nymphs can feed on houseflies, from 3 rd instar on greenbottle flies and from 5 th<br />

instar on bluebottle flies. I provide some food variation by occasionally feeding them Dubia<br />

roaches (Blaptica dubia), locusts and mealworms. Despite former reports that Deroplatys sp.<br />

prefer crawling prey, it is my experience that flying prey is taken, at all instars, with the same<br />

enthusiasm as crawling prey. When a moult is imminent all prey animals, especially roaches<br />

and locusts, should be removed from the enclosure. In order to avoid mis-moulting you have<br />

to make sure that nymphs have enough space downwards (this means the enclosure should<br />

be at least 3 times the nymph’s length in height). Sometimes nymphs moult too close to the<br />

bottom resulting in a bent thorax in the best case. This is mostly an indication of a too low<br />

humidity and/or a lack of proper moulting surfaces in the upper part of the enclosure.<br />

Additionally, even from an apparently perfect position to moult, nymphs might fall during<br />

moulting. If you are lucky to be around when this happens, the nymph can be rescued either<br />

by hanging it back on the mesh or by holding it carefully with tweezers from the very end of<br />

their legs (the latter requires some patience and a calm hand).


<strong>UK</strong>MF Newsletter issue 6<br />

Reliable sexing works from 3 rd instar on by checking the shape of their pronotum. Male<br />

nymphs show a 20 pence-like shield, while female nymphs develop an M-shaped pronotum:<br />

Pronotum development of Deroplatys desiccata. Photographs by Stefan Engelhardt<br />

Another possibility for distinguishing the genders is to look at the lower abdominal segments.<br />

Females have a big last segment (in total 6), the males’ last segment is divided (a total of 8<br />

lower abdominal segments). This way of sexing works reliably from 4 th instar on. With a bit of<br />

experience 3 rd instar nymphs can be easily sexed, even without having both genders for<br />

direct comparison.<br />

From 3 rd instar onwards I keep nymphs separately in a 350 ml cup, from 5 th instar onwards in<br />

a 600 ml cup, and from sub adult I use BraPlast-Boxes as enclosures (all the different<br />

container types are shown above). Due to their aggressiveness I would recommend keeping<br />

nymphs separately, especially if only a few nymphs are present. Females should generally<br />

be kept separately. The development from hatch to adulthood takes, dependent on the food<br />

supply, around 6 months or more. Nymphs can adopt a variety of colours, from red-brown to<br />

grey-brown to dark-brown/black. How these colours are determined is, as with other species,<br />

not well understood. I kept all of my nymphs in equal conditions and background colours and<br />

obtained differently coloured morphs indicating that nymph colour is influenced to a large<br />

extent by their genes. As mentioned above, especially the sub adult stage can last for more<br />

than 2 months. Before their final moult nymphs stop eating for around a week and in<br />

comparison to other species it is quite hard to guess when this moult exactly will start: The<br />

swollen wingbuds are a clear sign of the imminent final moult, however extensive pumping of<br />

the abdomen is visible only minutes before.<br />

5<br />

www.uk<strong>mantis</strong><strong>forums</strong>.co.uk


<strong>UK</strong>MF Newsletter issue 6<br />

Developmental stages of Deroplatys desiccata. Photographs by Stefan Engelhardt<br />

Females will moult 8 times, males one time less. This is an important point for breeders. If<br />

you intend to breed nymphs that hatched from the same ooth, it is advisable to slow down<br />

the development of the males to make sure that both genders reach adulthood at least at the<br />

same time or, even better, the females become adult first.<br />

6<br />

www.uk<strong>mantis</strong><strong>forums</strong>.co.uk


<strong>UK</strong>MF Newsletter issue 6<br />

Exuviae of female and male Deroplatys desiccata (female 4 th instar exuvia is missing);<br />

Photographs by Stefan Engelhardt<br />

Breeding<br />

Adult females need 4-6 weeks before serious mating attempts should be started. I have not<br />

observed the “calling” of females earlier than 4 weeks after the last moult. If you try to<br />

introduce a male too early, in the best case the female will reject him, in the worst case she<br />

will eat him. This 4-6 weeks period is necessary for the female to fatten up and to produce<br />

eggs and ooth material inside of her body and a male introduced too early might be mistaken<br />

as prey. Once you see the female “calling” or if she has been an adult for at least 4 weeks<br />

and has gained weight, the male (adult for at least 2-3 weeks) should be put on a surface or a<br />

branch and left in peace. Some minutes later the female should be put in front of him so that<br />

he faces her abdomen. When she moves and he is in the mood, he will point his antennae<br />

towards her abdomen and will follow her. Usually the male jumps onto the female pretty<br />

quickly and it doesn’t take long for him to connect. The total mating time is rather long and he<br />

might be connected with the female for more than 24 hours. Afterwards he often stays on her<br />

back for some hours until he eventually leaves. I would recommend mating them outside their<br />

enclosure to provide enough space for the male to escape. The females are usually not very<br />

aggressive during mating and the males leave them unharmed (at least I haven’t lost any<br />

males due to mating cannibalism yet).<br />

Left: introducing a female (left) triggers courting behaviour in male (right); right:<br />

mating of Deroplatys desiccata. Photographs by Stefan Engelhardt<br />

It takes quite a while for the female to lay the first ooth after mating. Up to 4 weeks is not<br />

unusual. Further ooths are laid after 3-4 week intervals. A total of 7-10 ooths can be laid<br />

7<br />

www.uk<strong>mantis</strong><strong>forums</strong>.co.uk


<strong>UK</strong>MF Newsletter issue 6<br />

during a female’s lifetime. Since males are long-lived (up to 6 months) females should be remated<br />

after the 4 th ooth to make sure that all subsequent ooths contain fertilised eggs.<br />

Summary<br />

Given proper conditions and regular food, Deroplatys desiccata will prove to be not more<br />

difficult to keep than other species and will definitely add to each keeper’s collection. The<br />

extremely long-lived females, that can easily live for more than a year as adults, offer a great<br />

possibility to enjoy keeping this particular <strong>mantis</strong> species longer than others and to learn even<br />

more about their behaviour. Like all praying <strong>mantis</strong>, Deroplatys desiccata is a master of<br />

camouflage and the merging with background shapes and colours is as much an eye-catcher<br />

as their impressive threat displays:<br />

Threat display of adult female (left) and adult male (right) Deroplatys desiccata;<br />

photographs taken by Cain Eyre (left) and Stefan Engelhardt (right)<br />

Parameters<br />

Temperature: 27-30ºC (day) / 20 ºC (night)<br />

Humidity: 70-80% (daily misting)<br />

Ventilation: high<br />

Ooth incubation: 40-50 days<br />

Hatch rate: 30-60 nymphs<br />

Ooth number: 7-10<br />

Copulation readiness: 4-6 weeks (female); 2-3 weeks (male)<br />

Substrate: kitchen towel, vermiculite<br />

Number of moults: 8 (female), 7 (male)<br />

Decoration: bark, twigs, branches (willow, wild cherry, birch), raffia<br />

Food: flies (Drosophila hydei, houseflies, greenbottles, bluebottles), locusts, roaches,<br />

mealworms, waxworms and moths<br />

Reference<br />

Ehrmann, R. (2002) Mantodea: Gottesanbeterinnen der Welt. Natur und Tier, Munster.<br />

8<br />

www.uk<strong>mantis</strong><strong>forums</strong>.co.uk


Is Inbreeding Bad?<br />

Chun Siew<br />

<strong>UK</strong>MF Newsletter issue 6<br />

It is a common assumption that inbreeding is ‘bad’ for a species. We were taught this at<br />

school and we, as humans, avoid and frown upon breeding with our close relatives, so it is<br />

easy to conclude that inbreeding is ‘bad’. Following on from this theme, many animals and<br />

plants have evolved rather sophisticated mechanisms to avoid inbreeding. Such<br />

mechanisms are even evident in our beloved Order the Mantodea and it is not uncommon to<br />

find females of some species undergoing several more instars than their male counterparts.<br />

For example, in several flower mantids from the family Hymenopodidae, such as the orchid<br />

<strong>mantis</strong> (Hymenopus coronatus) and the banded flower <strong>mantis</strong> (Theopropus elegans), sexual<br />

dimorphism is very obvious with males undergoing several less instars before maturing than<br />

their sisters. By the time a female matures into an adult, her brothers would have moulted<br />

into adults several weeks or months ago. As adult males do not live very long, particularly<br />

with these species, they would normally die before their sisters can reach sexual maturity.<br />

By maturing at different times, the probability of siblings fertilising each other is greatly<br />

reduced.<br />

9<br />

www.uk<strong>mantis</strong><strong>forums</strong>.co.uk<br />

A male Theopropus elegans mounted on<br />

a female shows the extreme sexual<br />

dimorphism in this species. Photograph<br />

by Chun Siew.<br />

So why did these mechanisms evolve? What are the real disadvantages of inbreeding? In<br />

this article, I aim to summarise my experiences and explore basic theories in evolution, and<br />

discuss whether inbreeding has any detrimental effect on captive mantids and see how we<br />

can apply these theories to <strong>mantis</strong> husbandry and breeding.<br />

Inbreeding can be detrimental by increasing the probability of detrimental mutations and<br />

genes being passed on, which can reduce the fitness of offspring. Let’s imagine there was a<br />

small population where inbreeding was unavoidable and that individuals were susceptible to<br />

genetic diseases or defects. Over time in this small population, these disease-susceptible or<br />

detrimental genes accumulate and over generations of inbreeding, the probability that your<br />

offspring inheriting these genes becomes increasingly likely with every generation. Such a<br />

scenario is not uncommon and unfortunately occurs quite commonly in pedigree dogs and<br />

many of our domesticated animals.<br />

Apart from the accumulation of potentially detrimental genes, another big issue with an<br />

inbred population is the lack genetic diversity between individuals in the population. This<br />

means that the probability of you sharing your genes with another individual in the population


<strong>UK</strong>MF Newsletter issue 6<br />

becomes increasingly high in comparison to the probability in a randomly and selectively outbreeding<br />

population.<br />

Why is it necessary to have genetic variability? What are the advantages of having a<br />

highly diverse and varied gene pool?<br />

To highlight such example, here is an extract from Wikipedia: “George C. Williams gave an<br />

example based around the elm tree. In the forest of this example, empty patches between<br />

trees can support one individual each. When a patch becomes available because of the<br />

death of a tree, other trees' seeds will compete to fill the patch. Since the chance of a seed's<br />

success in occupying the patch depends upon its genotype, and a parent cannot anticipate<br />

which genotype is most successful, each parent will send many seeds, creating competition<br />

between siblings. Natural selection therefore favours parents which can produce a variety of<br />

offspring.”<br />

High genetic variability and diversity can help improve a population’s chances of exploiting<br />

untapped resources or new environments. When resources are exhausted in a given area,<br />

competition increases and individuals may then be forced to migrate to other areas in search<br />

of available resources. However, these resources can be in areas subjected to harsh<br />

environmental conditions or treacherous with predators. Those individuals within a<br />

population that can adapt morphologically and behaviourally to these new environments can<br />

therefore exploit these new resources and survive to reproduce and eventually spread their<br />

genes. In a way diversity and variability offers the population more ‘chips ‘to bet with’ and a<br />

population with the most chips to begin with will have the highest probability of winning big. If<br />

the gene pool is diverse, then there is a greater chance that individuals from this population<br />

can adapt to their new conditions and exploit the riches. These individuals carrying genes for<br />

these advantageous adaptations can therefore survive, mature into adults, reproduce and<br />

produce fitter and more offspring. Over time these adaptations become fixed into the<br />

population’s gene pool, as those lacking the advantageous gene sets would be outcompeted<br />

by those better adapted. By having variability, you are increasing the probability of your<br />

offspring’s ability and potential to adapt to changing environments. Such process is called<br />

natural selection, and this does not happen over one generation but through several or many<br />

generations.<br />

However, genetic diversity can be the deciding factor of whether a population<br />

survives, thrives or goes extinct.<br />

The Red Queen Hypothesis based on a reference to the Red Queen in the novel Alice and<br />

Wonderland, uses the analogy depicting the race between Alice and the Red Queen;<br />

describing nature’s evolutionary arms race. The author compares Alice’s race with those<br />

faced by practically every organism between pathogens, parasites, and predators and their<br />

hosts and preys. There is always a conflict between the exploited and the exploiter. The prey<br />

and the host, the exploited, will always try and stay one step ahead of their exploiters<br />

(predators and parasites) by evolving better immune systems or defence mechanisms. As a<br />

result, there is an ongoing cycle as the exploiters are forced to evolve better mechanisms to<br />

exploit their prey or host and so forth. This cycle is called the evolutionary arms’ race. In<br />

evolutionary terms, this is essentially a race between the exploiters and the exploited. As<br />

pathogens and diseases can wipe out entire populations; this can pose a serious problem to<br />

10<br />

www.uk<strong>mantis</strong><strong>forums</strong>.co.uk


<strong>UK</strong>MF Newsletter issue 6<br />

populations that lack genetic diversity and variability. If a population lacks genetic diversity,<br />

pests and diseases can easily exploit the population. In a genetically varied population, it is<br />

harder for the pathogen to exploit all the different combination of genes present. For<br />

example, it’s harder to win a game of lottery when you have to get all 10 numbers right as<br />

opposed to only getting all 3 numbers. During a disease outbreak in a genetically diverse<br />

population, susceptible individuals will die, however, not all the population is susceptible and<br />

the resistant ones will therefore survive and have a higher probability of spreading their<br />

genes. In a closely related population with no genetic diversity, there is no spectrum of<br />

resistance or immunity; all individuals are either susceptible or resistant. Therefore, parasites<br />

and pathogens can be important selective agents in a population. In addition, many empirical<br />

studies have also shown that high genetic variation in honeybees can be correlated with<br />

lower disease prevalence and increases in colony growth rate, suggesting the benefits of<br />

genetic diversity in preventing malignant infections and reducing parasite transmissions. This<br />

helps explain why natural selection has favoured out-breeding and a diverse gene pool over<br />

inbreeding in many animals and plants.<br />

A good example is the evolution of polyandry (mating with multiple males) in honeybees.<br />

One mating from a male can keep the virgin queen fertilised for the rest of her life, yet mated<br />

queens brave the elements and risk predation in order to mate again. In one particular case,<br />

a researcher documented one female that had mated with 100 males. Further empirical<br />

studies have shown that genetic diversity and variability can mean the survival of a colony of<br />

bees, which helps explain why these queens take considerable risks to leave the safety of<br />

her nest to mate with more males.<br />

So inbreeding is bad right?<br />

There are good reasons to assume that inbreeding is bad and detrimental. However, it is<br />

wrong to assume that inbreeding is detrimental to all animals. For example, many animals<br />

including insects and even mammals are inbred, such as termites (read up on diplodiploidy<br />

for those who are interested), parasitic wasps, the African naked mole rat and even our<br />

beloved felines and canines. Therefore, we need to consider whether inbreeding is<br />

detrimental on a case-by-case basis.<br />

There’s no denying the benefits of genetic variability and diversity, but this depends<br />

on the circumstances.<br />

Inbreeding has played a big role in domestication and selective breeding for desirable traits<br />

in dogs, cattles, pigs etc. It is even used by plant breeders to select for disease, pest and<br />

drought resistant crops for example. Inbreeding can also be equally important in fixing<br />

beneficial genes in the population, which is why traits for antibiotic resistance can spread<br />

extremely quickly within a population. In other words, once resistance or a beneficial trait<br />

evolves, the offspring or clone is almost guaranteed to inherit those sets of beneficial genes.<br />

However, crossing of genes as a result of sexual reproduction means there is only a 50%<br />

chance that gene would get passed onto your offspring (unless both your parents possess<br />

the beneficial trait). Similarly, inbreeding can also be advantageous, as useful mutations<br />

such as resistance to a particular disease can be passed on to the next generation very very<br />

quickly, whilst out breeding increases the chances of your resistance genes being mixed up<br />

with susceptible genes and diluting the advantageous resistance. In insects with shorter<br />

11<br />

www.uk<strong>mantis</strong><strong>forums</strong>.co.uk


<strong>UK</strong>MF Newsletter issue 6<br />

generation times, such advantageous genes can be accumulated at a much quicker rate<br />

than for example a mammal, which is why pest insects can become resistant to insecticides.<br />

So how does this relate to breeding mantids?<br />

I remember when I first started keeping mantids people were claiming that they were<br />

experiencing the effects of inbreeding in species such as Gongylus gongylodes, with low<br />

hatch rates, random deaths, uninterested males and females laying dud oothecae. However<br />

we can’t say for sure whether this was true or hobbyists simply pointed their finger to<br />

inbreeding (as it is pretty easy to do so especially when a <strong>mantis</strong> dies ‘for no reason’).<br />

I will let you make your mind up on this topic, but from my experience, I believe that under<br />

certain circumstances, inbreeding can actually be beneficial.<br />

By keeping a <strong>mantis</strong> in captivity, we have to understand that we are providing them with an<br />

'unnatural' environment. We provide them with a limited range of temperatures, humidity,<br />

food items and subject them to artificial lights and photoperiod. Along with these unnatural<br />

conditions, how many of us can say that we had more than 20 breeding individuals to breed<br />

with? By using such a small number of individuals we are creating a bottleneck effect. We<br />

are inadvertently providing a selective pressure when keeping and breeding mantids in<br />

captivity. Think back to the natural selection. In this new artificial environment, those<br />

individuals that can adapt, survive and breed in these environments will continue to survive<br />

and reproduce, whilst those that are the most sensitive to environmental (and physical)<br />

stress will die and fail to reproduce. If a certain stock is doing fine, the introduction of new<br />

genes into the gene pool can be more detrimental than advantageous contrary to popular<br />

belief. Even if both stocks came from the same country, one cannot assume that they both<br />

came from the same location or are adapted to the same environment/microclimate. This is<br />

one of the reasons why IGM had been set up, so people can keep track of their stocks and<br />

its origin. For those interested, I suggest going back to the first issue of the <strong>newsletter</strong> and<br />

reading Christian’s IGM article (rather than having to repeat what he has written).<br />

Realistically, the majority of people on the forum are casual hobbyists. How many of us can<br />

say we have bred a particular species for more than 5 or even 3 generations? Most people<br />

either get rid of their stock or move onto another species after several generations. If this is<br />

the case, the probability you will encounter any problems from inbreeding is close to zero.<br />

However inbreeding can contribute to whether a newly introduced line will persist or ‘go<br />

extinct’ in the hobby, which is why we should consider whether inbreeding is detrimental on<br />

a case-by-case basis. Under such circumstances, it seems like inbreeding can actually be<br />

beneficial, although I base this all on my experience.<br />

This was a topic for a rather heated debate on <strong>UK</strong>MF earlier this year and I thought it would<br />

be interesting to revisit the issue with an open mind. The difficulties breeders face when<br />

introducing a new species in the hobby and making sure that it will still be around in years to<br />

come is finding the balance between establishing as much genetic diversity as possible from<br />

a small group of captive stocks but yet ensuring that introduction of genes from wild<br />

specimens do not reset the gene pool of captive populations to captive environments. This is<br />

no easy feat and this is probably why many of the new species that get introduced into the<br />

hobby never get establish and die out before they can become widely available to everyone.<br />

12<br />

www.uk<strong>mantis</strong><strong>forums</strong>.co.uk


<strong>UK</strong>MF Newsletter issue 6<br />

It is difficult to say whether a species failed to establish in culture after a few years is a result<br />

of limited genetic variability. There are many reasons why stock die out, especially when<br />

working with such a small number of breeding individuals, stochastic (random) events<br />

become a very important factor in influencing whether a species persists or perishes from<br />

culture. These are random events, which can cause a substantial consequence on a<br />

population. In the wild, these include sudden drought, an introduction of a non-native<br />

predator, freak weather etc. For example, the marine iguana populations were threatened to<br />

extinction as a result of the El Nino in the Galapagos. In captive conditions, the stochastic<br />

event is us. We are humans after all, and no one can say they have never made a mistake.<br />

The issue of whether genetic diversity is necessary in <strong>mantis</strong> husbandry is complex. In<br />

summary, when genetic variability is high, adaptation to new environments occurs quicker.<br />

Over several generations, a particular stock can become adapted to the artificial conditions.<br />

When we eliminate predators, parasites and diseases and provide our beloved mantids with<br />

suboptimal conditions and a constant supply of food, this allows more individuals with<br />

different genotypes to survive and reproduce. Mutations still occur and over time the genetic<br />

variability increases because the environment is no longer a selective pressure as the stock<br />

becomes acclimatised to artificial conditions thus more individuals make it to adulthood and<br />

reproduce. When a species remains in a hobby for several generations, the captive<br />

population becomes increasingly adapted to the environmental conditions we provide. I am<br />

not suggesting that introducing new blood to the gene pool is bad, but if it is unnecessary, I<br />

think it’s best working with what we’ve got instead of having to constantly rely on collecting<br />

new ‘blood’ from the wild.<br />

I hope this article has stimulated some thoughts into this topic.<br />

13<br />

www.uk<strong>mantis</strong><strong>forums</strong>.co.uk


<strong>UK</strong>MF Newsletter issue 6<br />

Mantid Nymph Care: A Personal Overview<br />

Kirobella<br />

After a mantid has successfully mated, a fertile ootheca laid and the incubation requirements<br />

of ventilation, humidity and heat have been met, a handful or more nymphs will need<br />

attention. All three mentioned elements are key to the growth and survival of nymphs. Each<br />

can be critical to such delicate creatures – especially in the first week or so of their life.<br />

After hatching from an ootheca nymphs need to harden off the chitin exoskeleton which<br />

protects them. The surface of the exoskeleton becomes rigid after a while which, for<br />

example, allows the legs to set properly. A good circulation of clean air is necessary but<br />

drafts should be avoided.<br />

A collection of various dud and spent oothecae (left) and a female Hierodula<br />

unimaculata laying an ootheca (right).<br />

I have found nymphs will quench their thirst twenty four hours or so after hatching with a very<br />

light fine mist spray. Preferably the water would have been left to stand for twenty four hours<br />

prior. It should neither be too cold or too hot – tepid is best. This very fine misting will be<br />

sufficient for their small mouthparts and avoids the water from forming into larger droplets in<br />

which the nymphs can drown. I will repeat spray three to four times on the very first day<br />

before any prey item is offered to them. Use your judgement to see that indeed the first<br />

misting has evaporated before continuing with successive watering. Excess humidity can<br />

lead to an accumulation of moisture especially if the first factor of ventilation is not met.<br />

Furthermore, large moisture droplets can prove fatal to a nymph.<br />

To maintain a background level of humidity some use a simple plastic box, such as those<br />

obtained from the purchase of a box of locusts for example, which has small perforations in it<br />

and to which further holes can simply be added. A sufficient wad of kitchen roll or fabric that<br />

has been wetted and placed in the box can be used to maintain the humidity. Note that the<br />

14<br />

www.uk<strong>mantis</strong><strong>forums</strong>.co.uk


<strong>UK</strong>MF Newsletter issue 6<br />

lid to the box is secured too. Some of the material may also be teased through a small hole<br />

in the plastic so as to provide for a drinking platform if needed. Emphasis to this last point is<br />

that when I have kept a hatch communally there always seem to be a number of nymphs<br />

that will permanently occupy a lower niche in the enclosure and it is for their benefit to which<br />

I address this tendency. Often branches, leaves and other footholds will block an adequate<br />

fall of spray without a more heavier ‘drenching’ since I will only mist from the top.<br />

A warm ambient temperature is beneficial for all mantids, some requiring more heat than<br />

others but generally not until they are more developed in further instars. This will be very<br />

relevant for us members here in the United Kingdom having a temperate climate, which is<br />

variable even upon summer days as well as when in the year an ootheca hatches.<br />

Hatching S. aurea nymphs (left) and a fine spray mist dispenser (right)<br />

I have found that most oothecae hatching in the spring or early summer will see nymphs not<br />

requiring additional heat sources and that the mean temperature day and night is suitable.<br />

Nymphs are quite delicate and additional heat is not always necessary, although heat will aid<br />

humidity as well as in general increasing metabolic rate and in turn that drive to feed and<br />

thus grow. Another factor is the size of the enclosure and the material from which it is made<br />

which will add to the overall equation of the nymphs’ husbandry, if indeed additional heat is<br />

used. Nymphs within a heated ‘insect room’ are fine but the last issue concerns those that<br />

only have one or more separate enclosures to look after and may be thinking of using heatmats<br />

etc.<br />

With many species having nymph numbers reach one hundred or more a suitable enclosure<br />

is required. I cannot emphasise the importance of the previous three elements which may<br />

well optimise the success rate which you will experience raising such nymphs and these will<br />

influence your choice of enclosure. Of course, if a spare large glass or plastic tank is at hand<br />

then I’m sure that would suffice. Not all species need nymphs separated as to avoid<br />

cannibalism and many will co-habit up to around 5 th instar or more. This is especially true of<br />

most Sphodro<strong>mantis</strong> species.<br />

15<br />

www.uk<strong>mantis</strong><strong>forums</strong>.co.uk


<strong>UK</strong>MF Newsletter issue 6<br />

16<br />

www.uk<strong>mantis</strong><strong>forums</strong>.co.uk<br />

I recommend the fishing<br />

ring-net enclosures which<br />

can be found for as little as<br />

one pound in high street<br />

outlets. These provide<br />

ventilation, can be mist<br />

sprayed from the outside<br />

and hung from a ceiling out<br />

of the way. A slow rainfall<br />

of faeces will over time<br />

accumulate though. . Be<br />

sure to check that the<br />

mesh size is adequate to<br />

prevent the escape of fruit<br />

flies. I have one type that<br />

has a very fine triangular<br />

weave whilst others have<br />

hexagonal, round or square<br />

weaves.<br />

A cheap £1 ring net 60 cm x 30 cm (left). A slit on one side approximately one straws<br />

width for feeding (right) and a close up of the triangular weave of the ring nets I find<br />

best.<br />

When I use these ring nets I will cut a small hole in the lower side of the netting, one along<br />

the hem of the net where the two ends meet, and then sew the top and the bottom of the<br />

said to stop the slit from widening. The slit is just a sufficient size to allow a drinking straw to<br />

pass through it (or the tubing from a pooter). Fruit flies are fed into the chamber via this<br />

opening. A small safety pin provides to close it when not in use.<br />

With the approach of an expected hatch the breeder has to be prepared. An essential and<br />

often much overlooked item is the availability of prey. One should establish a good few<br />

batches of fruit fly cultures beforehand. All nymphs will take fruit flies. What I find convenient<br />

with fruit flies is that because they are so small they will not disturb a nymph during ecdysis.<br />

A few have reported that a nymph has fallen during such a process resulting from blue or<br />

green bottle fly action. I will use fruit flies for as long as possible – in some instances right up<br />

until 4 th instar depending upon species. There are many online outlets from which fruit flies<br />

are obtainable, or any good pet store, provided an order<br />

is placed and perhaps paid for prior.<br />

As the nymphs grow and develop into larger instars,<br />

larger prey items such as wax worms and moths, green<br />

and blue bottle flies, maggots, hatchlings and small<br />

locusts will be needed. The need to feed them will<br />

eventually become apparent if the cannibalism rate<br />

increases. I tended to leave a batch of fly castors in a<br />

tub that hatched so many every day and topped this up


<strong>UK</strong>MF Newsletter issue 6<br />

with further castors that had been kept cooler. A variety of other prey was offered every<br />

week.<br />

I have used the frame from a flexarium here covered with a finer net to house a batch of<br />

Rhombodera basalis. The net size prevented fruit fly escape. I later attached thin ribbons of<br />

the same netting to the ceiling and left them to dangle so as to provide a greater surface<br />

area for the nymphs to occupy.<br />

Left: A couple of potted Guzmania bromeliads placed on a wet tea towel within<br />

the net flexarium. Right: Two flexariums placed one on top of the other to<br />

accommodate two different hatches. Both have Lawsons cypress branches within. The<br />

upper unit shows also a tub of green bottle castors which were placed within and allowed to<br />

hatch in the heat of the summer.<br />

Later in the season a few artificial stems were suspended from the ceiling of the net<br />

enclosure to provide a greater surface area for the spatial distribution of the nymphs. This<br />

allowed them to occupy a niche, to catch prey and ecdyse and minimise disturbance from<br />

each other and prey.<br />

All photographs are the authors.<br />

17<br />

www.uk<strong>mantis</strong><strong>forums</strong>.co.uk


<strong>UK</strong>MF Newsletter issue 6<br />

Breeding Events<br />

Gillian Higgins<br />

From the forum classifieds: nymphs bred by members and offered for sale from<br />

September 2011 to December 2011<br />

Species IGM Offered from<br />

Acro<strong>mantis</strong> formosana <strong>UK</strong><br />

Acontista multicolor 153 <strong>UK</strong>, Poland<br />

Cilnia humeralis 169 <strong>UK</strong><br />

Creobroter apicalis 211 <strong>UK</strong><br />

Creobroter gemmatus Poland, <strong>UK</strong><br />

Deroplatys lobata <strong>UK</strong><br />

Gongylus gongylodes 177 Germany,<br />

Hierodula membranacea <strong>UK</strong><br />

Hymenopus coronatus Germany, <strong>UK</strong><br />

Idolo<strong>mantis</strong> diabolica <strong>UK</strong><br />

Mio<strong>mantis</strong> binotata 226 <strong>UK</strong>. Switzerland<br />

Mio<strong>mantis</strong> cf caffra (Johannesburg) 222 Netherlands<br />

Mio<strong>mantis</strong> paykulli <strong>UK</strong><br />

Omo<strong>mantis</strong> zebrata 176 <strong>UK</strong><br />

Oxyopsis gracilis <strong>UK</strong><br />

Phyllocrania paradoxa Poland, <strong>UK</strong><br />

Phyllovates chlorophaea <strong>UK</strong><br />

Polyspilota aeruginosa <strong>UK</strong><br />

Popa spurca Poland, <strong>UK</strong><br />

Pseudocreobotra wahlbergii 49 <strong>UK</strong><br />

Sibylla pretiosa Poland<br />

Sphodro<strong>mantis</strong> cf aurea 164 <strong>UK</strong><br />

Sphodro<strong>mantis</strong> gastrica Poland<br />

Sphodro<strong>mantis</strong> sp.(blue flash) 214 Germany<br />

Stagmo<strong>mantis</strong> theophila 220 <strong>UK</strong><br />

Theopropus elegans <strong>UK</strong><br />

26 species of captive bred nymphs were offered for sale in the classifieds during the last 4<br />

month period. In total this year nymphs from 46 species were captive bred and offered for<br />

sale on the forum.<br />

At the end of February a forum thread was started to report matings and hatches. The<br />

purpose of the reports was mainly to see if species declining in culture were being lost<br />

because of breeding difficulty or because of lack of breeding attempts. Twenty-one members<br />

entered reports and in addition entered data such as hatch number and incubation time.<br />

Breeding data will vary depending on environmental conditions, parental nutrition and the<br />

number of oothecae a female has laid. However by collecting the data from a number of<br />

keepers the range of typical hatch rates and other data can be determined and added to<br />

care sheets. For example Pseudocreobotra wahlbergii ooths were reported to hatch between<br />

15 and 23 nymphs and Hymenopus coronatus were reported to hatch between 70 and 105<br />

18<br />

www.uk<strong>mantis</strong><strong>forums</strong>.co.uk


<strong>UK</strong>MF Newsletter issue 6<br />

nymphs. A big thank you to everyone who has taken the time to submit these reports, they<br />

will eventually also be submitted into a species in culture database. The results are<br />

summarised in the supplementary table at the end of the <strong>newsletter</strong>.<br />

Some interesting findings from the breeding reports for the year:<br />

� Species that are being very successfully bred in culture at the moment by a number<br />

of breeders are Acontista multicolor Pseudocreobotra wahlbergii, Hymenopus<br />

coronatus, Popa spurca, Deroplatys desiccata, Phyllocrania paradoxa,<br />

Pseudoharpax virescens and Sibylla pretiosa. In most cases at least four different<br />

keepers reported successfully breeding these species, but with Hymenopus<br />

coranatus and Phyllocrania paradoxa this also included two generations reported<br />

over the year. For example Paul MI6 reported a first generation of Hymenopus<br />

corantus in February 2011 and a second generation ten months later in December<br />

2011. The Ghost Mantis (Phyllocrania paradoxa) had the most reports (7) of<br />

successful breeding attempts.<br />

� There could be a problem with breeding Theopropus elegans. Five keepers reported<br />

mating this species but only one reported a successful hatch. For example one<br />

keeper noted ‘Theopropus elegans. Mated, ooths laid and failed to hatch’.<br />

� A hatch was reported of one nymph from a Creobroter gemmatus ooth that was<br />

thought to be infertile. Could this be a possible case of parthenogenesis?<br />

� A Harpago<strong>mantis</strong> tricolor ooth hatched 14 nymphs with one or two nymphs hatching<br />

every day over nine days.<br />

Thesprotia graminis hatching report by Nico<br />

This review is based on three oothecae. Two of them were laid by mated females. One was<br />

laid by an unmated female. My original stock came from a breeder in the USA. He sent three<br />

oothecae from mated females, captive bred by him. I presume his original stock came from<br />

the wild as this species can be found in this state.<br />

Incubation.<br />

� First ooth: Room temperature (25-26°C), humidity level 50-60%, never sprayed.<br />

Incubated for 5 weeks. Hatched 20 nymphs.<br />

� Second ooth: 28°C, humidity level 50%, sprayed every week. Incubated 4 weeks.<br />

Hatched more than 30 nymphs!<br />

� Third ooth (not fertilised): 28°C, humidity level 50%, sprayed every week. Incubated<br />

6-7 weeks. Hatched 3 nymphs.<br />

Nymph care<br />

I gave water to the nymphs immediately after hatching as they appeared to like and need to<br />

drink then. Nymphs were sprayed lightly with water every 2 days, but they can tolerate a<br />

totally dry climate. They were able to catch Drosophila hydei and D. melanogaster fruitflies<br />

without any problem but will look for smaller prey such as springtails. Wood wool seems the<br />

perfect decor for them when they are young. Cannibalism will occur only if there is not<br />

enough food. They do not seem to need much space to achieve successful molting (every 2<br />

weeks). At the time of writing they are now fourth instar (1 st ooth), third instar (2 nd ooth) and<br />

second instar (3 rd ooth).<br />

19<br />

www.uk<strong>mantis</strong><strong>forums</strong>.co.uk


Competition Winners<br />

<strong>UK</strong>MF Newsletter issue 6<br />

Congratulations to our picture of the month (POTM) winners:<br />

August 2011, theme ‘A Mantis on or with a flower or flowers’. Sulasula. Newsletter cover.<br />

September 2011, theme ‘Predatory behaviour’, Bogzla.<br />

October 2011, theme ‘Halloween/fear, Sulasula. Shown below.<br />

November 2011, theme ‘Dead leaf <strong>mantis</strong>es’, Bauapaul.<br />

‘Hellboy’ the winning entry in the October Halloween POTM. Photograph of male<br />

Gongylus gongylodes by Sulasula<br />

All the winning pictures of 2011 can be viewed in a ‘sticky’ thread in the competition section.<br />

All forum members are encouraged to enter and vote and suggestions for themes are<br />

welcome.<br />

Congratulations to Jane who won the book The Praying Mantids by Frederick R Prete,<br />

Harrington Wells, Lawrence E Hurd. The book was donated by Andie Johnson as an award<br />

for spotting the forum Christmas decoration.<br />

20<br />

www.uk<strong>mantis</strong><strong>forums</strong>.co.uk


Forum Digest: 2011<br />

<strong>UK</strong>MF Newsletter issue 6<br />

Following a suggestion from Mrblue I have selected some of the many interesting threads<br />

on the forum. For this issue one thread has been selected from each month. It was hard to<br />

select just one thread from each month as some months had a number of very interesting<br />

threads that should really be included but are not, due to space. In future issues this will be a<br />

regular feature with selected abbreviations of some of the threads. If any member would like<br />

to volunteer to produce a regular forum digest for the <strong>newsletter</strong> please contact me.<br />

January<br />

I thought it would be a good idea to remind everyone about instars with this post from Rob<br />

Byatt in January 2011 when he reposted a post he made on another forum (Bugnation) in<br />

2007. “Okay, as most of you know I'm a traditionalist when it comes to naming the stadium<br />

at which an insect is at. I wish for all posts to describe this stadium as an instar not 'L'. This<br />

is for a reason - it is the correct scientific way. We all know what happened last time I didn't<br />

reference this, so.....The intervals between the ecdyses are known as stages or stadia, and<br />

the form assumed by an insect during a particular stadium is termed an instar. (Imms, A.D.<br />

1964. A general Textbook of Entomology. London: Methuen & Co. inc.. p.222.)" In recent<br />

months I have seen an increasing number of people slipping back to the dark side, hence<br />

this post”<br />

And people are slipping back again, hence the reminder for the New Year here.<br />

February<br />

Drumkitchen (Stefan Engelhardt) began a breeding diary for Deroplatys desiccata in<br />

February that has had over 2000 views to date. This is a very detailed, complete diary with<br />

beautiful pictures and observations and I agree with Kirobella’s post: “Congrats - one of the<br />

best diaries I have read”.<br />

This diary has the full scientific name in the title of the thread and so makes it easy for<br />

people who are searching for information on a species. It is hoped that in 2012 we will begin<br />

to push towards having scientific names in the first instance in a thread as it will help<br />

searches and avoid confusion.<br />

March<br />

In March 94 members submitted a list of the species they were keeping into survey software.<br />

A discussion of the full results can be seen in Newsletter no. 5. A total of 85 species were<br />

being kept and for me a surprise result was that Gongylus gongylodes was the second most<br />

commonly recorded species in culture at the time.<br />

April<br />

In April Cameron Die Konigin posted some pictures of the remarkable Peruvian Shield<br />

Mantis (Choeradodis rhombicollis) that he had described collecting on his trip to Ecuador in<br />

the February 2011 addition of the <strong>newsletter</strong>. “They are slow to grow, presumably because<br />

21<br />

www.uk<strong>mantis</strong><strong>forums</strong>.co.uk


<strong>UK</strong>MF Newsletter issue 6<br />

they put most of their effort into developing the 4.5 cm wide shield (for the female), hence<br />

why they are called shield <strong>mantis</strong> or leaf <strong>mantis</strong>.”<br />

Chun Siew added that he had collected various males in Costa Rica but never managed to<br />

get a female, since they were coming to light-traps rather than hand-collecting as Cameron<br />

had.<br />

May<br />

Mantis Massive started an interesting thread called “Taming the <strong>mantis</strong>” asking whether<br />

people notice if their <strong>mantis</strong>es get accustomed to being handled over time. “If you take them<br />

out of their enclosure for handling when they are nymphs, will it be less of a hassle when<br />

they are full size and you want to mate them? Basically, I don't want to cause my <strong>mantis</strong><br />

nymphs (first to 4 th instar) any extra stress, but am finding that the mere presence of me<br />

peering in at them will sometimes spark quite a full on threat display”<br />

Electrophil, mick-h and strike had all found that their <strong>mantis</strong>es become calmer with regular<br />

handling.<br />

June<br />

Bransckia posted information on the Humbertiella stock currently in culture in the thread<br />

‘Humbertiella "ceylonica" is Humbertiella sp. (IGM 212). “It is the same stock that was<br />

introduced in August 2010 from India. More details are in the IGM List number 212: The<br />

information may help if you are looking for counterparts or more specimens of this<br />

stock/species.”<br />

In the discussion that followed forum members shared their information on the care<br />

conditions they use for this species. Draco wrote that he had a hatching rate of around 30-<br />

40 nymphs but that he had difficulty keeping them healthy. Branskia replied that he had the<br />

same difficulty with raising all the hatchlings. Kovachii and Psychniko also shared their<br />

culture conditions and both used very high humidity with the hatchlings. A more full account<br />

of the culture conditions that these members used can be found in this thread.<br />

July<br />

In the General Mantis Discussions forum Diamorphine<br />

started a thread ‘Male ate our female?’ as it appeared that<br />

her male Ghost Mantis (Phyllocrania paradoxa) might<br />

have eaten the female during mating. In the discussion<br />

that followed there were three further examples of this<br />

unusual behaviour. MantidLord reported that he had an<br />

adult male Iris oratoria which ate the female.<br />

Creobroterman reported that he had seen a<br />

Pseudoharpax adult male munch on the female's thorax<br />

but that he separated them in time and Mylo reported that<br />

a Spiny Flower Mantis (Pseudocreobotra whalbergii)<br />

exhibited "reverse cannibalism” where the male was on<br />

her back and locked onto her and ate her head.<br />

22<br />

www.uk<strong>mantis</strong><strong>forums</strong>.co.uk<br />

Phyllocrania paradoxa showing<br />

fatal injury. Photograph by<br />

Diamorphine


<strong>UK</strong>MF Newsletter issue 6<br />

August<br />

Danielbd100 asked for advice on breeding Mantis religiosa after being given two adults that<br />

mated almost immediately. Drumkitchen and Tom Boeije offered good ootheca and nymph<br />

care advice and then the discussion moved onto ooth diapause in this species.<br />

Drumkitchen explained diapause: “For some species, especially the ones to be found in the<br />

cooler temperate regions, a diapause is absolutely crucial for their development inside of the<br />

eggs. Without a cooler period over several months they would never hatch”.<br />

Tom Boeije and creobroterman offered some techniques for incubating ooths in diapause.<br />

By placing ooths into a cooler environment the resting diapause is broken and the ooths can<br />

develop and hatch. This prevents them hatching before the winter frosts.<br />

September<br />

Regularly on the forum we get identification requests for <strong>mantis</strong>es found in the wild. Although<br />

a full identification is not really possible from a picture, suggestions can be made by<br />

members of a possible genus and maybe species when combined with the knowledge of the<br />

location. This was the case when RyoKenzaki asked for identification help for two species<br />

he found in Malaysia. Dessicata suggested an A<strong>mantis</strong> species for one and RyoKenzaki<br />

agreed that seemed possible as the ooth also had the appearance of an A<strong>mantis</strong> ooth.<br />

Christian then suggested Hapalopeza nitens as the other species and agreed the possible<br />

identification of A<strong>mantis</strong>, and suggested it was probably A. reticulata.<br />

October<br />

Birdfly began a thread “Plistospilota guineensis, Mega <strong>mantis</strong>, 3rd time lucky ??” An<br />

interesting observation that he made was that the behaviour of this latest generation was<br />

different to previous generations. “My last male moulted to adulthood successfully last night<br />

so I have 3 adult males and 2 females now. I must say that these 5 are real settled<br />

compared to the 10 I've kept before which would throw themselves to the floor at the<br />

slightest chance, run around like headless chickens and damage themselves until totally<br />

stressed out”.<br />

MrBlue suggested this might be the distance from the wild. Rob Byatt has kept these for<br />

many generations and wrote “The species seems to be settling down a bit at last; they are<br />

becoming easier to rear (notice how many managed that last year compared to previous<br />

years?), but breeding them is still a pain“.<br />

23<br />

www.uk<strong>mantis</strong><strong>forums</strong>.co.uk<br />

The thread has stunning pictures and<br />

valuable information on this species and<br />

continues into 2012 AlienMarky and Emago’s<br />

breeding attempts.<br />

Plistospilota guineensis foreleg<br />

showing the discoidal spines.<br />

Photograph by Gary Symes


<strong>UK</strong>MF Newsletter issue 6<br />

November<br />

Stunning photos of a species new to the forum were<br />

posted in November from two threads started in October.<br />

Kovachii posted pictures of a mating pair of<br />

Parymenopus davisoni. The species is sometimes seen<br />

referred to as Parhymenopus davisoni but<br />

Branksikia.cleared up the name confusion with a<br />

reference to the paper where the name was revised<br />

(Roy, R. 2007. Parymenopus Wood-Mason 1890, et<br />

Cataspilota Giglio-Tos, genres valides (Dict. Mantidae). -<br />

Bulletin de la Societe Entomologique de France 112(1):<br />

p. 89-91).<br />

Chun started a thread Parymenopus davisoni (IGM 230)<br />

in late October with some photographs nymphs and<br />

Mrblue also added photos the interesting comparison<br />

shot shown of a P. davisoni female (above), one moult to<br />

adult and a Hymenopus.coronatus female (below),<br />

perhaps three moults to adult. Hopefully we will see<br />

some more of this species in 2012.<br />

December<br />

For December I have chosen a thread that began at the<br />

beginning of the year and has continued throughout the<br />

year to December. The thread was begun by Lethalhayd<br />

to find out who was still keeping Acanthops sp. IGM 151.<br />

Gurd wrote that his first generation females were still<br />

growing strong after 6 months as adults and gave<br />

breeding and care advice. Chun described breeding this<br />

species and wrote that “The males can be a little rough<br />

when mating and it is not uncommon to see the males<br />

accidentally piercing the female abdomen”.<br />

The thread was quiet for a number of months until.<br />

PaulM16 reported that he had hatching success. Mrblue<br />

wrote that the unusual shape of the females seemed to<br />

confound the males sometimes. PaulM16 replied “I<br />

noticed that on the first 2 mating attempts the female kept her shape fairly 'tight' and fought<br />

off the male aggressively, but on the third attempt she lowered her abdomen as if to signal<br />

that she was receptive to the male and didn’t so much as flinch during his approach”.<br />

In November PaulM16 reported the good news that his third ootheca had the largest hatch<br />

yet with 47 nymphs. This post that began in January ended with success for this species<br />

with this last post of the year by PaulM16. “4th and 5th ooths have also hatched 35 and 38<br />

nymphs respectively. 6th ooth has been sent out to another breeder and my female has laid<br />

ooths 7,8 & 9 over the last few weeks”.<br />

24<br />

www.uk<strong>mantis</strong><strong>forums</strong>.co.uk<br />

Photograph by MrBlue<br />

Acanthops sp. mating.<br />

Photograph by MrBlue


<strong>UK</strong>MF Newsletter issue 6<br />

Mantodea Abstracts, November 2010 – December<br />

2011<br />

Compiled by Gillian Higgins<br />

The abstracts for scientific papers related to the study of <strong>mantis</strong>es are listed below.<br />

Allen, L. E., Barry, K. L., Holwell, G. I. (2011), Mate Location and Antennal Morphology in<br />

the Praying Mantid Hierodula majuscula. Australian Journal of Entomology. 2011, doi:<br />

10.1111/j.1440-6055.2011.00843.<br />

Abstract: Many sensory modes can be exploited to determine the location of potential<br />

mates. In insects, long-distance location primarily involves chemical or acoustic cues,<br />

whereas short-distance communication mainly utilises visual or tactile cues. The structural<br />

complexity of the environment may influence the transmission of information, and therefore,<br />

it is common to see multiple sensory modes employed to increase the likelihood of accurate<br />

mate location. Praying mantids are known to use airborne chemicals for long-distance<br />

location and visual cues in close proximity. This study examined which types of cues are<br />

used for mate location in an unstudied species, Hierodula majuscula, from Queensland,<br />

Australia. The timing of female pheromone emission during ‘calling’ periods reached a peak<br />

at 3:00 h, with the majority of females assuming a calling posture at this time. Scanning<br />

electron microscopy was used to confirm the presence of basiconic sensilla (used for<br />

chemical reception) on male antennae, and males successfully responded to female<br />

chemical cues and subsequently located potential mates. Males were not as successful at<br />

finding females when restricted to using visual cues.<br />

Allen, L. E., Barry, K. L., Holwell, G. I., Herberstein, M. E., Perceived Risk of Sperm<br />

Competition Affects Juvenile Development and Ejaculate Expenditure in Male Praying<br />

Mantids. Animal Behaviour, 2011, 82 (5): 1201-1206,<br />

Abstract: Sperm competition occurs when a female mates with more than one male, and<br />

the sperm of those males compete directly over fertilizing her eggs. In polyandrous animals,<br />

males can respond to the perceived risk of sperm competition by flexibly adjusting aspects of<br />

their development and reproductive investment. In high-risk scenarios we might expect<br />

males to accelerate development so as to mature quickly and locate receptive females first<br />

and/or transfer more sperm so as to outcompete rival sperm. We examined these<br />

predictions using the false garden mantid, Pseudo<strong>mantis</strong> albofimbriata, a medium-sized<br />

praying mantid found on the east coast of Australia. Males are less than half the mass of<br />

females. Sexual cannibalism occurs in up to 40% of interactions, highlighting the importance<br />

of investing optimally in reproductive opportunities for males. We housed juvenile males in<br />

two operational sex ratio treatments: three males, one female (high risk of sperm<br />

competition) and one male, three females (low risk). We found no evidence of accelerated<br />

development in the high-risk group; instead, high-risk males took longer to mature. Possibly,<br />

males exposed to a higher risk of sperm competition delay maturity in order to invest in<br />

testes development and sperm production. We also found that males reared in the high-risk<br />

treatment transferred significantly more sperm than males reared in the low-risk treatment,<br />

providing evidence of strategic ejaculation in male P. albofimbriata. This is the first study<br />

demonstrating a male response to the perceived risk of sperm competition via delayed<br />

development and increased ejaculate investment in praying mantids.<br />

25<br />

www.uk<strong>mantis</strong><strong>forums</strong>.co.uk


<strong>UK</strong>MF Newsletter issue 6<br />

Avendaño, J., Sarmiento, C. E., Allometry and Ontogeny in Callibia Diana Stål<br />

(Mantodea: Acanthopidae). Neotropical entomology, 2011, 40 (4): 462-469.<br />

Abstract: The life-cycle of Callibia diana Stål is described and linear and geometric<br />

morphometrics are used for studying allometrics and shape changes throughout this<br />

neotropical mantid species' life-cycle. Significant changes were expected in the allometry<br />

and shape of the raptorial leg and abdomen, given the importance of hunting and<br />

reproduction. The allometric slopes were obtained by using total length as the independent<br />

variable. Geometric morphometrics of landmarks were used for frontal femur and tibia.<br />

Hunting and reproduction-related structures had the steepest slopes and positive<br />

allometries. Negative growth of both disc width and head width found in the last moulting<br />

event may be a consequence of prothoracic muscle growth which is responsible for<br />

predatory strike strength. The tibial claw and femur of the raptorial leg become larger, while<br />

their spines become more orthogonal to the longitudinal axes which may facilitate prey<br />

retention. These changes in mantid shape throughout ontogeny were consistent and<br />

suggested the resource allocation and development programming of the body that improved<br />

reaching distance and prey retention.<br />

Barry, K., Holwell, G., Herberstein, M., A Paternity Advantage for Speedy Males? Sperm<br />

Precedence Patterns and Female Re-mating Frequencies in a Sexually Cannibalistic<br />

Praying Mantid. Evolutionary Ecology, 2011, 25 (1): 107-119<br />

http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/s10682-010-9384-3<br />

Abstract: Scramble competition polygyny is expected when females and/or resources are<br />

widely dispersed and not easily monopolized by males, or when there is an abundance of<br />

mates during an extremely restricted reproductive period. Additional factors such as first<br />

male sperm precedence or low female re-mating rate might further explain the propensity of<br />

males to engage in scramble competition. The sexually cannibalistic praying mantid<br />

Pseudo<strong>mantis</strong> albofimbriata exhibits a polygynous mating system, where females exist in<br />

low-density populations and male competition manifests as the race to find females rather<br />

than as direct physical fighting. Here, we aim to determine whether there is a paternity<br />

advantage for the first-male to mate and/or a low frequency of female re-mating. First, we<br />

determined sperm precedence patterns in P. albofimbriata using the sterile male technique.<br />

Second, we tested the likelihood of female re-mating in P. albofimbriata by comparing the<br />

close-range approach behaviour and frequency of successful mating attempts for males<br />

when paired with virgin as opposed to recently mated females, and by comparing the<br />

frequency of long-distance male attraction between virgin and mated females. We found no<br />

paternity advantage for the first male to mate, rather a second male advantage. Although<br />

mated females were not rejected by males when approached from close-range, they were<br />

chemically unattractive to males searching from a distance. Since initial mate attraction in<br />

many praying mantids, including P. albofimbriata, is mediated via long-distance chemical<br />

communication, we believe the latter result is more ecologically relevant and therefore more<br />

important. These results suggest that the relatively low frequency of female re-mating<br />

observed in P. albofimbriata may be an additional factor driving scramble competition in this<br />

system.<br />

26<br />

www.uk<strong>mantis</strong><strong>forums</strong>.co.uk


<strong>UK</strong>MF Newsletter issue 6<br />

Battiston, R., Galliani,C., On the Life-cycle of Ameles spallanzania (Rossi, 1792)<br />

(Insecta, Mantodea). Atti Soc. it. Sci. nat. Museo civ. Stor. nat. Milano, 2011, 52 (I): 25-35.<br />

Abstract: The recent find of an Ameles spallanzania population in a continental area of<br />

northern Italy permitted to redraw the northernmost edge of the distribution of this species<br />

and to study its life cycle in extreme climatic conditions. A comparison with collecting records<br />

of adult specimens from the Mediterranean area has been performed to put in evidence how<br />

this species adapts its life-cycle timings in different latitudes: hatching earlier or using<br />

nymphs to overwinter in warmer localities or oothecae in colder ones. Overwintering<br />

strategies of Ameles spallanzania have been compared with strategies of other genera of<br />

mantids that share the same habitat but have different life-cycle strategies and general<br />

distribution. Different developing times in mantids seem to be linked to behavioural<br />

strategies more than physiological attitudes.<br />

Chandra, K., Sharma, R. M., Harshey, D. K., Gongylus gongylodes (Linnaeus) (Insecta:<br />

Mantodea): A New Record for Madhya Pradesh, India. Bugs R All, 2011, 17: 2230-7052.<br />

Koli, Y. J. and Bhawane G. P., Mantid Fauna of Chandoli National Park, Maharashtra,<br />

India. The Bioscan, 2011, 6 (1): 77-80<br />

Abstract: A year-long survey was conducted to assess the mantid species assemblage in<br />

various natural and anthropogenic habitats of Chandoli National park. Total of 11 Mantid<br />

species belonging to 11 genera, 7 subfamilies and 3 families were recorded. The family<br />

Mantidae (7 species) was found to be dominant in the study region, followed by families<br />

Hymenopodidae and Empusidae (2 species each).<br />

Kral, K., How Far Stationary Contrast Boundaries Can Be a Way to Elicit Behavioral<br />

Responses in Praying Mantis. Journal of Insect Behavior., 2011: 1-10<br />

http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/s10905-011-9283-7<br />

Abstract: The aim of the present study was to investigate the distance at which vertical<br />

black and white stripes (contrast boundaries) elicit object-related behavioral responses in 6th<br />

instar and adults of the praying <strong>mantis</strong> Mantis religiosa. The mantids reacted when the<br />

contrast boundaries were not further away than 60 cm. However, with increasing distance<br />

(>20 cm), the contrast boundaries became progressively less significant for the mantids.<br />

Jumps/preparation of jumps could be observed between 10 and 30 cm. The results are<br />

supportive for distance measurement of up to 20–30 cm, which corresponds to distance<br />

accessible for the insect. It seems that image motion cues induced by peering movements<br />

play an important role.<br />

Lombardo, F., Umbriaco, R., Taxonomic Re-evaluation of Parastagmatoptera abnormis<br />

Beier, 1963 (Dictyoptera, Mantidae: Stagmatopterinae): An Unusual Case of “Parasiteinduced”<br />

Synonymy. Zootaxa , 2011, 2735: 31–34<br />

Abstract: The Neotropical genus Parastagmatoptera Saussure includes medium-sized<br />

species distributed in tropical and subtropical areas of Central and Southern America.<br />

Thirteen nominal species have been so far described (Agudelo et al. 2007), with most<br />

species currently known from few specimens, often of one sex only. Beier (1963) described<br />

Parastagmatoptera abnormis Beier, 1963 based on a single male specimen from Surinam.<br />

Unfortunately, Beier’s original description lacks enough details to allow an accurate<br />

literature-based identification and, since its original description, no additional specimens<br />

ascribable to P. abnormis have been recorded. We recently had the opportunity to examine<br />

27<br />

www.uk<strong>mantis</strong><strong>forums</strong>.co.uk


<strong>UK</strong>MF Newsletter issue 6<br />

the holotype of P. abnormis, which is deposited in the Biozentrum Grindel und Zoologisches<br />

Museum (ZMH-Hamburg, Germany). After the examination of the holotype’s external<br />

morphology, we believe that the erection of this species was the result of an unusual case of<br />

misidentification. The type specimen exhibits some interesting morphological features that<br />

we believe might have resulted from the activities of an internal parasite, which we describe<br />

as follows.<br />

Luan, F., Zhang, S., Cai, Y., Sun, Z., Wang, B., Huang, B., Li, Z,. Identification of the<br />

Molecular Origin and Development of a Panzootic Caused by Beauveria bassiana in<br />

Praying Mantis Populations in Eastern China. Journal of Invertebrate Pathology, 2011,<br />

108, (2): 98-105. (http://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0022201111001121)<br />

Abstract: A panzootic in praying mantid species Tenodera sinensis and Statilia maculate,<br />

caused by Beauveria bassiana, occurred in north, southwest and southeast regions of Anhui<br />

Province, eastern China in Autumn, 2009. A 3-d principal component analysis (PCA) of 123<br />

isolates from three sites revealed that the B. bassiana populations were heterogeneous with<br />

obvious dominance. Furthermore, the causal source of the panzootic in Anhui was shown to<br />

be polyphyletic. The populations were homogenized into homogenous subunits for<br />

investigation of genetic structure by inter-simple sequence repeat (ISSR) markers. Variance<br />

was greater than 70%, largely due to genetic differences within populations and<br />

subpopulations. Genetic distances and genetic differentiation were negatively associated<br />

with geographic distances and it was speculated that this was due to the effects of<br />

monsoons and topography. Mantid isolates were divided into five pathotypes based on a<br />

two-way cluster analysis of genetic distance. Pathotype I consisted of the predominant<br />

subpopulations of Huangcangyu and Chashui populations, with a genetic distance of 0.120<br />

and gene flow up to 1.833. This pathotype caused a widespread epizootic in north and<br />

southwest Anhui, and Pathotype III caused enzootic at Site A in September and then<br />

epizootic in October, while the other three pathotypes caused enzootics at all three<br />

investigation sites. The widespread epizootics and isolated enzootics composed the<br />

polyphyletic panzootic in Anhui. A strong gene flow between isolates from the two mantid<br />

species was identified, resulting in negligible gene differentiation. This indicated a lack of<br />

host specificity in mantid isolates of B. bassiana.<br />

Maxwell, M.R., Gallego, K. M., Barry, K. L., Effects of Female Feeding Regime in a<br />

Sexually Cannibalistic Mantid: Fecundity, Cannibalism, and Male Response in<br />

Stagmo<strong>mantis</strong> limbata (Mantodea). Ecological Entomology, 2010, 35 (6): 775-787.<br />

Abstract: 1. Female feeding regime exhibited a cascade of effects on reproductive biology<br />

and behaviour in the mantid Stagmo<strong>mantis</strong> limbata (Hahn). 2. Well-fed females (High diet)<br />

consistently attained greater body mass, thicker abdomens, and higher fecundity than foodlimited<br />

females (Low diet) in four annual generations. Dorso-ventral abdominal thickness<br />

strongly correlated with fecundity. 3. In an experiment in captivity, Low diet females were<br />

more likely to cannibalize males than High diet females. 4. High diet females attracted more<br />

males than Low diet females in several contexts. In terms of long-range attraction, caged<br />

High diet females attracted more males in the field. In terms of short-range attraction, males<br />

preferentially mounted and copulated with High diet females in captive paired choice trials. In<br />

naturally-occurring pairs in the field, a preference for females with thick abdomens was<br />

evident. These results point to two possible explanations: male choice for well-fed females<br />

and state-dependent female pheromone emission. 5. Two years of field data indicate<br />

considerable variation in female feeding success, as measured by abdominal thickness.<br />

28<br />

www.uk<strong>mantis</strong><strong>forums</strong>.co.uk


<strong>UK</strong>MF Newsletter issue 6<br />

Average feeding success in nature appears to be relatively high, when comparing the rate of<br />

abdominal expansion in the field to captive females maintained on High diets. 6. In the field,<br />

nearly all mounts and copulations occurred in September in both years, when female feeding<br />

success is expected to be high. If mating activity occurs during a window of high female<br />

feeding success, so as to reduce the risk of cannibalism for males, then the female feeding<br />

regime may be implicated in the phenology of mating activity in cannibalistic species.<br />

Mohammad, K. S., Alla, S. M. G., El-Hamouly, H., Ehrmann, R., Nasser, M. G. E.,<br />

Mantodea of Egypt. Zootaxa, 2011, 3044: 1–27.<br />

Abstract: The Mantodea of Egypt were studied by examining and identifying specimens<br />

from four main Egyptian collections and some of those preserved in international museums,<br />

collecting specimens from various parts of the country between July 2007 and April 2010,<br />

and previous Egyptian records. We found 60 species belonging to 21 genera and 4 families.<br />

Eremiaphilidae included 31 species in 2 genera with one new record from Egypt,<br />

Eremiaphila gigas; Empusidae, 7 species in 4 genera; Mantidae, 18 species in 13 genera<br />

with one new species, Elaea solimani; and Tarachodidae, 3 species in 2 genera. We provide<br />

identification keys for Egyptian taxa, data on the material examined, the world distribution,<br />

synonyms and a description of the new species.<br />

O’Hanlon, J., Intraspecific Interactions and Their Effect on Habitat Utilisation by the<br />

Praying Mantid Ciulfina biseriata (Mantodea: Liturgusidae). Journal of Ethology 2011,<br />

29 (1): 47-54. Url: http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/s10164-010-0220-6<br />

Abstract: Tree trunks are spatially separated habitat patches for the tree-running mantid<br />

Ciulfina biseriata (Mantodea: Liturgusidae). This paper investigates how intraspecific<br />

interactions may affect spacing patterns in C. biseriata. Many mantid species inhabit tree<br />

trunk surfaces, but little is known about how they interact with this type of habitat.<br />

Behavioural observations and choice tests investigated the effect of a conspecific on habitat<br />

utilisation. Field surveys were used to investigate patterns of movement in the field. The<br />

decision to inhabit a tree trunk may be affected by the presence of a conspecific. Whereas<br />

adult males seek out females when selecting habitat, females will actively avoid males.<br />

Habitat choice decisions are primarily based on aspects of their mating system rather than<br />

on competition for space or food resources. The behavioural interactions of C. biseriata are<br />

described, including novel observations of same-sex mating behaviour in adult males.<br />

O’Hanlon, J. C. and Holwell, G. I., The Influence of Abrupt Forest Edges on Praying<br />

Mantid Populations. Insect Conservation and Diversity, 2011, 4 (2): 107–114.<br />

Abstract: 1. The concept of an 'edge' habitat that is influenced by the biotic and abiotic<br />

characteristics of neighbouring habitats is a broadly applied principle in ecology. 2. Ciulfina<br />

klassi Giglio-Tos (Mantodea: Liturgusidae) inhabit vertical tree trunk surfaces in a restricted<br />

patch of coastal Melaleuca woodlands in the world heritage listed Wet Tropics Region of far<br />

north Queensland, Australia. Preliminary observations suggested that abrupt forest edges<br />

may have a positive effect on population density in the praying <strong>mantis</strong> C. klassi. 3. During<br />

field surveys over a two-year period, mantid densities were found to be higher at forest<br />

edges than forest interiors. 4. Greater sapling recruitment at forest edges may contribute to<br />

this edge effect by providing dense patches of tree trunk habitats. 5. The population<br />

characteristics of C. klassi are also described here in the context of our current<br />

understanding of praying mantid life histories. Aspects of the ecology of this tropical praying<br />

29<br />

www.uk<strong>mantis</strong><strong>forums</strong>.co.uk


<strong>UK</strong>MF Newsletter issue 6<br />

<strong>mantis</strong> species contrast with what is already understood about previously studied temperate<br />

species.<br />

Peck, S. B., Herrera, H. W., CDF Checklist of Galapagos Cockroaches, Mantids and<br />

Termites - FCD Lista de especies de Cucarachas, mantidos y termitas de Galápagos.<br />

In: Bungartz, F., Herrera, H., Jaramillo, P., Tirado, N., Jiménez-Uzcátegui, G., Ruiz, D.,<br />

Guézou, A. & Ziemmeck, F. (eds.). Charles Darwin Foundation Galapagos Species<br />

Checklist - Lista de Especies de Galápagos de la Fundación Charles Darwin. Charles<br />

Darwin Foundation / Fundación Charles Darwin, Puerto Ayora, Galapagos:2011,<br />

http://www.darwinfoundation.org/datazone/checklists/terrestrial-invertebrates/dictyoptera/<br />

Prete, F. R., Komito, J. L., Dominguez, S. Svenson, G., Lopez, L. Y., Guillen, A.,<br />

Bogdanivich, N., Visual Stimuli That Elicit Appetitive Behaviors in Three<br />

Morphologically Distinct Species of Praying Mantis. Journal of comparative physiology<br />

a-neuroethology sensory neural and behavioral physiology, 2011, 197 (9):877-894<br />

Abstract: We assessed the differences in appetitive responses to visual stimuli by three<br />

species of praying <strong>mantis</strong> (Insecta: Mantodea), Tenodera aridifolia sinensis, Mantis religiosa,<br />

and Cilnia humeralis. Tethered, adult females watched computer generated stimuli<br />

(erratically moving disks or linearly moving rectangles) that varied along predetermined<br />

parameters. Three responses were scored: tracking, approaching, and striking. Threshold<br />

stimulus size (diameter) for tracking and striking at disks ranged from 3.5 deg (C. humeralis)<br />

to 7.8 deg (M. religiosa), and from 3.3 deg (C. humeralis) to 11.7 deg (M. religiosa),<br />

respectively. Unlike the other species which struck at disks as large as 44 deg, T. a. sinensis<br />

displayed a preference for 14 deg disks. Disks moving at 143 deg/s were preferred by all<br />

species. M. religiosa exhibited the most approaching behavior, and with T. a. sinensis<br />

distinguished between rectangular stimuli moving parallel versus perpendicular to their long<br />

axes. C. humeralis did not make this distinction. Stimulus sizes that elicited the target<br />

behaviors were not related to <strong>mantis</strong> size. However, differences in compound eye<br />

morphology may be related to species differences: C. humeralis' eyes are farthest apart, and<br />

it has an apparently narrower binocular visual field which may affect retinal inputs to<br />

movement-sensitive visual interneurons.<br />

Roy, R. and Svenson, G. J., Revision of Platycalymma Westwood, 1889, and the<br />

Synonymy of Ichro<strong>mantis</strong> Paulian, 1957 (Mantodea, Iridopterygidae,<br />

Tropidomantinae). Zootaxa, 2011, 3014: 1-25.<br />

Abstract: The endemic Malagasy praying <strong>mantis</strong> genus Platycalymma Westwood, 1889, is<br />

taxonomically treated with a re-description of the genus and of the type species, P. latipennis<br />

Westwood, 1889. The genus Ichro<strong>mantis</strong> Paulian, 1957, is newly determined as a junior<br />

synonym to Platycalymma, which results in the inclusion of two additional species within the<br />

genus, P. befasica (Paulian, 1957) and P. dichroica (Paulian, 1957), both re-described within<br />

this study. In addition, we add three new species to the genus described from Madagascar:<br />

P. annulicornis n. sp., P. mahafalica n. sp. and P. viettei n. sp. A key to the six species in<br />

English and French is provided for increased accessibility to the people of Madagascar.<br />

Illustrations of major features used to diagnose species are provided including the head,<br />

pronotum, apex of abdomen and male genitalia. Species distribution is presented and<br />

locality coordinates are provided in print as well as being available for download as a KML<br />

file viewable in Google Earth.<br />

30<br />

www.uk<strong>mantis</strong><strong>forums</strong>.co.uk


<strong>UK</strong>MF Newsletter issue 6<br />

Svenson, G. J. and Roy, R., 2011. Taxonomic Treatment of the Endemic Malagasy<br />

Praying Mantis Genus Hyalo<strong>mantis</strong> GIGLIO-TOS, 1915, With a New Synonymy and the<br />

Description of Three New Species (Mantodea, Iridopterygidae, Tropidomantinae).<br />

Zootaxa, 2011, 2777: 1-24.<br />

Abstract: The praying <strong>mantis</strong> genus Hyalo<strong>mantis</strong> Giglio-Tos, 1915 (Mantodea,<br />

Iridopterygidae, Tropidomantinae) historically included two species, H. madagascariensis<br />

Saussure, 1870 and H. punctata Giglio-Tos, 1915. However, we found that H. punctata is a<br />

junior synonym through investigation of the original descriptions and specimen comparisons.<br />

We have redescribed H. madagascariensis to encompass variability of color patterns that<br />

may have led to the description of H. punctata. The taxonomic history for the genus and<br />

species is outlined partly to resolve under Article 33.3.1 of the Code (ICZN, 4 th edition) an<br />

incorrect subsequent spelling of Miopteryx madagascarensis Saussure, 1870 that is in<br />

prevailing use. In addition, we add three new species to the genus described from<br />

Madagascar: H. antsingica n. sp., H. murzini n. sp., and H. whitingi n. sp. A key to the four<br />

species in English and French is provided for increase accessibility to the people of<br />

Madagascar. Illustrations of major features used to diagnose species are provided including<br />

the head, pronotum, and male genitalia. Species distribution is presented and locality<br />

coordinates are provided in print as well as being available for download as a KML file<br />

viewable in Google Earth.<br />

Umbers, K. D. L., Holwell, G. I., Stow, A. J. and Herberstein, M. E., Molecular Evidence for<br />

Variation in Polyandry Among Praying Mantids (Mantodea: Ciulfina). Journal of<br />

Zoology, 2011, 284: 40–45.<br />

Abstract: Estimating paternity patterns provides insights into the importance of competing<br />

evolutionary forces on mating systems. The number of sires contributing to a female's<br />

offspring is mostly influenced by her relative promiscuity. However, in a postcopulatory<br />

context, it will also be affected by sperm competition and cryptic female choice. Here, we<br />

describe the paternity patterns of two species of praying <strong>mantis</strong> from the genus Ciulfina, the<br />

agile praying mantid. This study is the first to describe patterns of paternity in the Mantodea.<br />

We found a variation in paternity in these two closely related species. Ciulfina rentzi<br />

exhibited single paternity, with a single male siring all offspring within a clutch. By contrast,<br />

Ciulfina klassi displayed multiple paternity, with the minimum number of fathers contributing<br />

to a clutch ranging from one to four. Differences in copulation duration and reproductive<br />

output between these two species may help to explain these paternity patterns.<br />

Vyjayandi, M. C., Rajeesh R. S., Sajin John P., Dhanasree M. M., On a Collection of<br />

Praying Mantids (Insecta: Mantodea) from Goa, India, With New Distribution Records.<br />

Journal of Threatened Taxa, 2010, 2 (12): 1325-1329.<br />

Abstract: Mantid fauna of southern India is very rich. Out of the 162 species of mantids<br />

under 68 genera reported from India, 45 species under 35 genera are known from southern<br />

India (Mukherjee et al. 1995). Only one species was reported from Goa, which is one of the<br />

smallest states of India located in the western coast. Serious attempts for field surveys and<br />

collection of mantids have ever been carried in the region. The present paper is based on<br />

some mantid species from Goa collected during a field survey conducted during the months<br />

of September October 2008. A total of six species of mantids under six genera are collected<br />

and reported for the first time from Goa, India.<br />

31<br />

www.uk<strong>mantis</strong><strong>forums</strong>.co.uk


<strong>UK</strong>MF Newsletter issue 6<br />

Watanabe, E., Adachi-Hagimori, T., Miura, K., Maxwell M. R., Ando, Y., and Takematsu, Y.,<br />

Multiple Paternity within Field-Collected Egg Cases of the Praying Mantid Tenodera<br />

aridifolia. Annals of the Entomological Society of America, 2011, 104 (2): 348-352<br />

Abstract: We developed microsatellite loci to examine the occurrence of multiple paternity in<br />

the praying mantid Tenodera aridifolia Stoll, as inferred from the genotypes of the progeny<br />

within field-collected oothecae (egg cases). The microsatellite locus MTA, developed from<br />

field-caught mantids, was found to have three alleles (A, B, and C) among >600 hatchlings<br />

from 18 oothecae from two locations in Japan. Of the 18 oothecae, two show clear evidence<br />

of multiple sires, two show equivocal evidence of multiple sires, and the remaining 14 do not<br />

show evidence of multiple sires. Thirteen of the latter 14 oothecae are exclusively<br />

homozygous, with all progeny being of the same genotype (BB). Although the exclusively<br />

homozygous oothecae suggest a high incidence of monogamy in these field populations, we<br />

caution that we probably underestimated the incidence of multiple paternity, given our use of<br />

one locus with three alleles. This study is the first genetic investigation of field-collected<br />

progeny of a sexually cannibalistic species, as well as the first demonstration of multiple<br />

paternity in nature for a sexually cannibalistic species.<br />

Wipfler, B., Wieland, F., DeCarlo, F., Hörnschemeyer, T., Cephalic Morphology of<br />

Hymenopus coronatus (Insecta: Mantodea) and its Phylogenetic Implications.<br />

Arthropod Structure and Development, 2012, 41 (1): 87-100<br />

Abstract: External and internal head structures of the mantodean Hymenopus coronatus are<br />

examined and described in detail. The results are elaborately compared with the literature.<br />

Strong crests on the anterior tentorial arms that articulate with the subantennal suture, a<br />

parietal suture and glossae and paraglossae with anteriorly bent tips are proposed as new<br />

potential apomorphies for Mantodea while a head capsule being wider than long, enlarged<br />

compound eyes, the presence of a frontal shield or scutellum, lateral lobes in the anterior<br />

tentorial arms, the presence of a transverse and an interantennal suture and the reduction of<br />

the mentum are confirmed as apomorphies, As potential apomorphies for Dictyoptera the<br />

reduction of Musculus tentoriobuccalis lateralis (M. 49) is newly presented and a “perforate”<br />

tentorium, lacinial incisivi that are located in a galeal pouch and the presence of a postmola<br />

are confirmed. The present study shows the value of cephalic morphology for phylogenetic<br />

analysis but also points out that further studies including evolutionary key taxa are essential<br />

for resolving the evolutionary adaptations among dictyopterans.<br />

Yamawaki Y, Uno K, Ikeda R, Toh Y. T, Coordinated Movements of the Head and Body<br />

During Orienting Behaviour in the Praying Mantis Tenodera aridifolia. Journal of Insect<br />

Physiology, 2011, 57 (7): 1010-1016<br />

Abstract: The visual orienting behaviour towards prey in the free-moving <strong>mantis</strong> was<br />

investigated with a highspeed camera. The orienting behaviour consisted of head, prothorax,<br />

and abdomen rotations. Coordinated movements of these body parts in the horizontal plane<br />

were analysed frame-by-frame. Rotations of these body parts were initiated with no or slight<br />

(


<strong>UK</strong>MF Newsletter issue 6<br />

Zhang, Y. L., Zhang, J., Jiang, N., Lu, Y. H., Wang, L., Xu, S. H., Wang, W., Zhang, G. F.,<br />

Xu, Q., Ge, ,H. M., Ma, J., Song, Y. C., Tan, R. X., Immunosuppressive Polyketides From<br />

Mantis-associated Daldinia eschscholzii. Journal of the American Chemical Society,<br />

2011, 133 (15): 5931-5940<br />

Abstract: Polyketides with unknown architectures are highly desired for the discovery of<br />

new drugs and agrochemicals. Here, the <strong>mantis</strong>-associated Daldinia eschscholzii, a fungus<br />

known to produce immunosuppressants dalesconols A and B, was found to simultaneously<br />

generate four novel skeletons capable of shaping the unusual chemistry of the fungal<br />

polyketides, of which seven were structurally unique and substantially immunosuppressive.<br />

In particular, the scaled-up fermentation of the microbe enabled the structural<br />

characterization of minor or "transitional" intermediate polyketides that allowed the<br />

reasonable recognition of the four biosynthetic pathways initiated by condensations of four,<br />

five, six and eight acetate units, respectively. Furthermore, the decarbonylation reaction of<br />

triketone, as in the case of daeschol A, was described for the first time, in addition to the<br />

structural correction of sporothrin C and nodulone. The work provided a set of novel<br />

immunosuppressive molecules that are of significance to drug discovery.<br />

33<br />

www.uk<strong>mantis</strong><strong>forums</strong>.co.uk


Supplementary table<br />

2011 breeding reports thread summary. Matings and hatches have been summarised to not include<br />

subsequent ooths, mates or re-mates of that set of the breeding attempt. Hatch numbers include<br />

subsequent ooths from the breeding attempt.<br />

Species Mated Hatched Hatch number<br />

Acanthops sp<br />

1<br />

Acontista multicolor<br />

3 15, 14<br />

Acro<strong>mantis</strong> sp<br />

1 approx 20<br />

Ameles sp. (not sure which one)<br />

1<br />

Brunneria borealis<br />

1<br />

Cilnia humeralis 1 1 105<br />

Creobroter gemmatus<br />

Deroplatys desiccata 1 3<br />

Deroplatys lobata<br />

Deroplatys truncata 1<br />

Empusa fasciata ooth from Tel-Aviv<br />

Euchomenella sp 1<br />

Gongylus gongylodes 3 2<br />

Harpago<strong>mantis</strong> tricolor<br />

2 approx 20<br />

1 30<br />

1 23<br />

1 14<br />

Heterochaeta orientalis IGM 180 1 1 (50 - 80)<br />

Hierodula membranacea<br />

Hymenopus coronatus 2 4 105,70,90,90<br />

Idolo<strong>mantis</strong> diabolica<br />

Mantis religiosa 1 1<br />

Mio<strong>mantis</strong> binotata<br />

2<br />

2 77, 32<br />

2 23,12,5,10<br />

Mio<strong>mantis</strong> paykullii 1 2 Av 36<br />

Mio<strong>mantis</strong> sp. from Tanzania.<br />

Mio<strong>mantis</strong> sp. 'Johannesburg' IGM 222 1<br />

Odonto<strong>mantis</strong> sp<br />

Oxyopsis festae<br />

Parasphendale affinis 1<br />

1<br />

2 35<br />

Phyllocrania paradoxa 6 7 29<br />

Phyllovates chlorophaea 1 1 30<br />

Plistospilota guineensis 1<br />

Pnigo<strong>mantis</strong> medioconstricta<br />

Polyspilota aeruginosa 2 2<br />

Popa spurca 2 4 >100<br />

Pseudocreobotra wahlbergii 3 4 22, 26,15, 27<br />

Pseudogalepsus nigricoxa IGM 224<br />

Pseudoharpax virescens 1 4<br />

Rhombodera basalis 1 2<br />

1<br />

1<br />

1 110<br />

Sibylla pretiosa 4 3 32<br />

Sphodro<strong>mantis</strong> lineola 1 1<br />

Sphodro<strong>mantis</strong> sp. "blueflash"<br />

Sphodro<strong>mantis</strong> viridis 1<br />

1 160<br />

Sphrodo<strong>mantis</strong> cf aurea 2 2 150<br />

Stagmo<strong>mantis</strong> californica<br />

Stagmo<strong>mantis</strong> limbata 1 1<br />

1


Stagmo<strong>mantis</strong> theophila<br />

Theopompa servillei<br />

Theopropus elegans, 5 1<br />

Thesprotia graminis<br />

<strong>UK</strong>MF Newsletter issue 4<br />

1<br />

1 30-40<br />

1 23<br />

www.uk<strong>mantis</strong><strong>forums</strong>.co.uk

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!