Skip to main content
SpringerLink
Log in

Assessment of genetic diversity in Moroccan fig (Ficus carica L.) collection by combining morphological and physicochemical descriptors

  • Research Article
  • Published:
Genetic Resources and Crop Evolution Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

There are not many exhaustive works emphasizing the amount of genetic diversity based on multivariate analysis of a large sample of fig (Ficus carica L.) cultivars in Morocco. In this study, 96 local and 44 introduced fig cultivars were assessed using 41 descriptors. The studied genotypes exhibited a highly significant variability based on morphological, colorimetric and physicochemical traits. Most of characters showed a high coefficient of variations (> 30%) revealing a high level of phenotypic diversity among the genotypes. Principal component analysis showed that the first 10 components explained 60.26% of the total inertia. Fruit weight, caliber, stalk, neck size, fruit shape, and skin color coordinates contributed to most of the total variation. Matrix of correlations showed significant positive and negative correlations among variables particularly fruit sizes, shape and skin color. Cluster analysis using the Unweighted Pair Group Method with Arithmetic Averages procedure for studied accessions revealed two major clusters and five subclusters. Principal component analysis scatter plot expressed a low level of variance compared to the cluster. It confirmed the same classification of the fig accessions, where fruit dimensions and skin color coordinates were the most discriminant descriptors. The results highlight a high phenotypic diversity within studied fig germplasm, which is probably more genetically related. The accessions panel can be recognized as an important gene pool for future breeding programs. The present study is of importance for planning fig genetic resources inventory, preserving the existing genetic variability and establishing national collections.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Log in via an institution

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Institutional subscriptions

Fig. 1
Fig. 2

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  • Achtak H, Oukabli A, Ater M, Santoni S, Kjellberg F, Khadari B (2009) Microsatellite markers as reliable tools for fig cultivar identification. J Am Soc Hortic Sci 134(6):624–631

    Google Scholar 

  • Achtak H, Ater M, Oukabli A, Santoni S, Kjellberg F, Khadari B (2010) Traditional agroecosystems as conservatories and incubators of cultivated plant varietal diversity: the case of fig (Ficus Carica L.) in Morocco. BMC Plant Biol 10(1):28

    PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  • Aljane F, Ferchichi A, Boukhris M (2008) Pomological characteristics of local fig (Ficus carica) cultivars in southern tunisia. Acta Hortic 798:123–128

    Google Scholar 

  • Aljane F, Nahdi S, Essid A (2012) Genetic diversity of some accessions of Tunisian fig tree (Ficus Carica L.) based in morphological and chemical traits. J Nat Prod Plant Resour 2:350–359

    Google Scholar 

  • Almajalia D, Abdel-Ghanib AH, Migdadia H (2012) Evaluation of genetic diversity among Jordanian fig germplasm accessions by morphological traits and ISSR markers. Sci Hortic 147:8–19

    Google Scholar 

  • Ater M, El Oualkadi A, Achtak H, Oukabli A, Khadari B (2008) Diversity of the local varieties of the fig tree in the North-Western Morocco. Acta Hortic 798:69–76

    Google Scholar 

  • Ateyyeh AF, Sadder MT (2006) Growth pattern and fruit characteristics of six common fig (Ficus Carica L.) cultivars in Jordan. Jordan J Agric Sci 2(2):105–112

    Google Scholar 

  • Badgujar SB, Patel VV, Bandivdekar AH, Mahajan RT (2014) Traditional uses, phytochemistry and pharmacology of Ficus carica: a review. Pharm Biol 52(11):1487–1503

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Benettayeb ZE, Bencheikh M, Setti B, Chaillou S (2017) Genetic diversity of Algerian fig (Ficus Carica L.) cultivars based on morphological and quality traits. Hortic Soc India 74(3):311–316

    Google Scholar 

  • Çalişkan O, Polat AA (2012) Morphological diversity among fig (Ficus Carica L.) accessions sampled from the Eastern Mediterranean Region of Turkey. Turk J Agric For 36(2):179–193

    Google Scholar 

  • Caliskan O, Bayazit S, Ilgin M, Karatas N (2017) Morphological diversity of caprifig (Ficus carica var. caprificus) accessions in the eastern Mediterranean region of Turkey: potential utility for caprification. Sci Hortic 222:46–56

    Google Scholar 

  • Can HZ, Misirli A, Kara S, Seferoglu G, Sahin N, Aksoy U (2001) Fig (Ficus Carica L.) selection study for fresh market in western Turkey. Acta Hortic 605:197–203

    Google Scholar 

  • Chalack L, Chehade A, Mattar E, Khadari B (2005) Morphological characterization of fig accessions cultivated in Lebanon. Acta Hortic 798:54–61

    Google Scholar 

  • Ciarmiello LF, Piccirillo P, Carillo P, De Luca A, Woodrow P (2015) Determination of the genetic relatedness of fig (Ficus Carica L.) accessions using RAPD fingerprint and their agro-morphological characterization. S Afr J Bot 97:40–47

    CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Darjazi BB (2011) Morphological and pomological characteristics of fig (Ficus Carica L.) cultivars from Varamin Iran. Afr J Biotechnol 10(82):19096–19105

    Google Scholar 

  • Ercisli S, Tosun M, Karlidag H, Dzubur A, Hadziabulic S, Aliman Y (2012) Color and antioxidant characteristics of some fresh fig (Ficus Carica L.) genotypes from northeastern Turkey. Plant Foods Hum Nutr 67(3):271–276

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Essid A, Aljane F, Ferchichi A (2017) Morphological characterization and pollen evaluation of some Tunisian ex situ planted caprifig (Ficus Carica L.) ecotypes. S Afr J Bot 111:134–143

    Google Scholar 

  • FAOSTAT (2017) Food and Agriculture Organization statistical database. 436 http://faostat.fao.org/default.aspx. Accessed 24 Oct 2018

  • Ferrara E, Papa G (2003) Evaluation of fig cultivars for breba crop. Acta Hort 605:91–93

    Google Scholar 

  • Gaaliche B, Trad M, Mars M (2011) Scientia Horticulturae effect of pollination intensity, frequency and pollen source on fig (Ficus Carica L.) productivity and fruit quality. Sci Hortic 130(4):737–742

    Google Scholar 

  • Gozlekcİ S (2011) Pomological traits of fig (Ficus Carica L.) genotypes collected in the West Mediterranean region in Turkey. J Anim Plant Sci 21(4):646–652

    Google Scholar 

  • Hirst K (1996) Fig trees and archaeology. The history of the domestication of fig trees. About.com Archaeology. http://archaeology.about.com/od/domestications/a/fig_ trees.htm

  • Hmimsa Y, Aumeeruddy-Thomas Y, Ater M (2012) Vernacular taxonomy, classification and varietal diversity of fig (Ficus Carica L.) among Jbala cultivators in northern Morocco. Hum Ecol 40(2):301–313

    Google Scholar 

  • Hmimsa Y, Aumeeruddy-thomas Y, Ater M (2017) Une forme spontanée de figuier (Ficus Carica L.), le nābūt. Revue d’ethnoecologie

  • Hssaini L, Hanine H, Razouk R, Ennahli S, Mekaoui A, Charafi J (2019) Characterization of local fig clones (Ficus Carica L.) collected in Northern Morocco. Fruits 74(2):55–64

    Google Scholar 

  • IIghbareyeh JMH, Carmona EC, Ortiz AC, Suliemieh AA, Ighbareyeh MH, Daraweesh AM (2018) Analysis of physical factors of climate and bioclimate and their effects on almonds production to increase the economy in Hebron area of Palestine. Arab J Geosci 11(21):683

  • IPGRI and CIHEAM (2003) Descriptors for Figs. International Plant Genetic Resources Institute (IPGRI), Rome, Italy, and the International Centre for Advanced Mediterranean Agronomic Studies (CIHEAM), Paris, France

  • Khadari B, Grout C, Santoni S, Kjellberg F (2005) Contrasted genetic diversity and differentiation among Mediterranean populations of Ficus Carica L.: a study using mtDNA RFLP. Genet Resour Crop Evol 52(1):97–109

    CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Khadivi A, Anjam R, Anjam K (2018) Morphological and pomological characterization of edible fig (Ficus Carica L.) to select the superior trees. Sci Hortic 238:66–74

    Google Scholar 

  • Mahdavian M, Lessani H, Kuhi M, Zare H, Krami M, Tabatabei Z (2006) Assessment of genetic diversity among different fig (Ficus Carica L.) collection from Iran. Acta Hortic 760:29–37

    Google Scholar 

  • Mars M, Chebli T, Marrakchi M (1998) Multivariate analysis of fig (Ficus Carica L.) germplasm in southern Tunisia. Acta Hortic 480:75–81

    Google Scholar 

  • Messaoudi Z, Haddadi L (2005) Morphological and chemical characterization of fourteen fig trees cultivated in Oulmes area, Morocco. Acta Hortic 798:83–86

    Google Scholar 

  • Norman PE, Tongoona P, Shanahan PE (2011) Determination of interrelationships among agr-morphological traits of yams (Discorea spp.) using correrlation and factor analyses. J Appl Biosci 45:3059–3070

    Google Scholar 

  • Papadopoulou K, Ehaliotis C, Tourna M, Kastani P, Karydis I, Zervakis G (2002) Genetic relatedness among diocious Ficus Carica L. cultivars by random amplified polymorphic DNA analysis, and evaluation of agronomic and morphological characters. Genetica 114(2):183–194

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Pereira C, López Corrales M, Martín A, Villalobos MDC, Córdoba MDG, Serradilla MJ (2017) Physicochemical and nutritional characterization of brebas for fresh consumption from nine fig varieties (Ficus Carica L.) grown in Extremadura (Spain). J Food Qual. https://doi.org/10.1155/2017/6302109

    CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Podgornik M, Vuk I, Vrhovnik I, Bandelj D (2010) Scientia Horticulturae A survey and morphological evaluation of fig (Ficus Carica L.) genetic resources from Slovenia. Sci Hortic 125(3):380–389

    Google Scholar 

  • Polat AA, Çalışkan O (2017) Correlations among important fruit quality and plant characteristics of some fig genotypes. J Life Sci 11:141–144

    Google Scholar 

  • Pourghayoumi M, Bakhshi D, Rahemi M, Noroozisharaf A, Jafari M, Salehi M, Chamane R, Hernandez F (2017) Phytochemical attributes of some dried fig (Ficus Carica L.) fruit cultivars grown in Iran. Agric Conspec Sci 81(3):161–166

    Google Scholar 

  • Rodolfi M, Ganino T, Chiancone B, Petruccelli R (2018) Identification and characterization of Italian common figs (Ficus carica) using nuclear microsatellite markers. Genet Resour Crop Evol 65(5):1337–1348

    CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Rodov V, Vinokur Y, Horev B (2012) Brief postharvest exposure to pulsed light stimulates coloration and anthocyanin accumulation in fig fruit (Ficus Carica L.). Postharvest Biol Tec 68:43–46

    CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Rodrigues MGF, Monteiro LNH, Flà A, Dos Santos TP, Pavan BE, Conceiã A (2018) Genetic variability in morphological characters among Fig tree accessions Fig genetic conservation. Genet Mol Res 17(4):1

    Google Scholar 

  • Saddoud O, Baraket G, Chatti K (2011) Using morphological characters and simple sequence repeat (SSR) Markers to characterize Tunisian fig (Ficus Carica L.) cultivars. Acta Biol Cracov Ser Bot 53(2):7–14

    Google Scholar 

  • Sanches J, Melgarejo P, Hemandz F, Martienz JJ (2002) Chemical and morphological characterization of four fig tree cultivars (Ficus carica L.) grown under similar culture conditions. Acta Hortic 605:33–36

    Google Scholar 

  • Sedaghat S, Rahemi M (2018) Effects of physio-chemical changes during fruit development on nutritional quality of fig (Ficus Carica L. var. ‘Sabz’) under rain-fed condition. Sci Hortic 237:44–50

    CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Tsantili E, Shin Y, Nock JF, Watkins CB (2010) Antioxidant concentrations during chilling injury development in peaches. Postharvest Biol Tech 57(1):27–34

    CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Veberic R, Mikulic-Petkovsek M (2016) Phytochemical composition of common fig (Ficus Carica L.) cultivars. In: Preddy S (ed) Nutritional composition of fruit cultivars. American Press, UK, pp 235–255

    Google Scholar 

  • Viuda-Martos M, Barber X, Pérez-Álvarez JA, Fernández-López J (2015) Assessment of chemical, physico-chemical, techno-functional and antioxidant properties of fig (Ficus Carica L.) powder co-products. Ind Crop Prod 69:472–479

    CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Wang Z, Cui Y, Vainstein A, Chen S, Ma H (2017) Regulation of fig (Ficus Carica L.) fruit color: metabolomic and transcriptomic analyses of the flavonoid biosynthetic pathway. Front Plant Sci 8:1990

    PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  • Zohary D, Hopf M, Weiss E (2012) Domestication of Plants in the Old World: the origin and spread of domesticated plants in Southwest Asia, Europe, and the Mediterranean Basin. Oxford University Press, Oxford

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Acknowledgements

This work was the financial support of Competitive Mechanism of Research-Development and Extension (MCRDV) program founded by the Ministry of Agriculture, Fisheries, Rural Development, Water and Forests of Morocco.

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

  1. National Institute for Agricultural Research (INRA), BO 578, Meknes, Morocco

    L. Hssaini, R. Razouk, A. Mekaoui, A. Ejjilani & J. Charafi

  2. Laboratory of Bioprocess and Bio-Interfaces, Faculty of Science and Technics, BO 523, Beni-Mellal, Morocco

    L. Hssaini, H. Hanine & A. Ejjilani

  3. National School of Agriculture (ENA), BO S/40, Meknes, Morocco

    S. Ennahli

Authors
  1. L. Hssaini
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  2. H. Hanine
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  3. R. Razouk
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  4. S. Ennahli
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  5. A. Mekaoui
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  6. A. Ejjilani
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  7. J. Charafi
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

Contributions

Lahcen Hssaini designed the research methodology, analyzed samples, performed the statistical analysis and interpreted the data. Jamal Charafi and Hafida Hanine helped in the methodology and provided the technical support for designing and conducting research, and Said Ennahli contributed in the statistical analysis and performed the review. Rachid Razouk, Assia Ejjilani and Abderrahman Mekaoui contributed in plant sampling and analysis.

Corresponding author

Correspondence to J. Charafi.

Ethics declarations

Conflict of interest

The authors declare that they have no conflict of interest.

Additional information

Publisher's Note

Springer Nature remains neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

Hssaini, L., Hanine, H., Razouk, R. et al. Assessment of genetic diversity in Moroccan fig (Ficus carica L.) collection by combining morphological and physicochemical descriptors. Genet Resour Crop Evol 67, 457–474 (2020). https://doi.org/10.1007/s10722-019-00838-x

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s10722-019-00838-x

Keywords

Search

Navigation