Named the characteristics of the light combat module "Narcissus"

32
Holding "High-precision complexes" during the forum "Army-2019" presented the combat module "Narcissus". This is a light combat installation, which is controlled remotely.





Named some characteristics of BM "Narcissus". It is equipped with a Kord 12-mm machine gun and an optical-electronic aiming system. The installation has the ability to fire both ground and air targets.

An important detail: the Narcissus combat module not only detects and recognizes targets at a distance of up to 10 km, but also guides them.
From the press service of Rostec:

A distinctive feature of the "Narcissus" from the majority of such installations is the presence of a multichannel sight with an independent line of sight. This design solution has increased the accuracy of shooting, including in motion, and also provided the possibility of hitting small air targets at a distance of 1500 meters.

The management of Narcissus is completely digitized, which ensures, as the manufacturer notes, its high quality. Digital technologies make it possible to complement the functionality of the combat module with various sensors, including topographic, meteorological and others.



"Narcissus" can be installed on various types of military vehicles, including reconnaissance and patrol. The control is carried out by an operator who sees the image of a tactical map on a special monitor. The fire from the "Korda" opens by pressing a button on the control panel.
32 comments
Information
Dear reader, to leave comments on the publication, you must sign in.
  1. 0
    25 June 2019 15: 18
    The layout, IMHO, is very unfortunate - very low protection from shrapnel and even from the "shooter".
    1. -3
      25 June 2019 16: 13
      Put it on the horse, he’ll go to shoot from the chase laughingWell, on the whole, at 10 km, which shooter hits !? Yes
      1. +3
        25 June 2019 16: 20
        10km is the detection radius, the possibility of defeat is up to 1,5 km. hi
        1. -3
          25 June 2019 16: 27
          I asked the question about buying tigers in Tashkent above, there is this module in the photo! The question is why it is impossible to unify, for example, the detection range with the range of the lethal force standing on this gun module! After all, it makes no sense, to find, for example, a cart of jihadists, and then get close to it at 1.5 km, they then have a memory, they will carry it to hell with dogs ... hi
          1. 0
            25 June 2019 16: 34
            Why such a unification? Discovered and kept on the fly, why go to the cart for 1,5 km? RPG-7 has not yet been canceled.
          2. -1
            25 June 2019 16: 46
            Quote: Popuas
            I asked the question about buying tigers in Tashkent above, there is this module in the photo! The question is why it is impossible to unify, for example, the detection range with the range of the lethal force standing on this gun module! After all, it makes no sense, to find, for example, a cart of jihadists, and then get close to it at 1.5 km, they then have a memory, they will carry it to hell with dogs ... hi

            what caliber do you propose to put on the module, which would hit 10 km? 57 mm? then it will not be an easy module.
        2. 0
          25 June 2019 16: 31
          he meant that in order to slam a mosquito, they don’t buy a phased array radar. 10 km are redundant.
          1. The comment was deleted.
          2. 0
            25 June 2019 16: 42
            Maybe the "weapon" is not enough for the radar? Why is the BTR / BMP 22 / 30mm autocannon bad? Tiger 2 will pull her. hi
          3. +5
            25 June 2019 16: 50
            Quote: yehat
            he meant that in order to slam a mosquito, they don’t buy a phased array radar. 10 km are redundant.

            it’s strange to somehow refuse the opportunity to see a little further ...
            1. -1
              25 June 2019 18: 03
              Yeah I see, but I won’t eat laughing and closer to get wink I can see with my eyes wassat
          4. +3
            25 June 2019 17: 27
            he meant that in order to slam a mosquito, they don’t buy a phased array radar. 10 km are redundant.

            Ideal, not redundant.
            Glad for the designers - the golden calf has not yet devoured everyone.
    2. 0
      25 June 2019 18: 33
      Well, developers should explain things, the reasons for this or that technical solution. we can only guess.
  2. +2
    25 June 2019 15: 20
    Purely my opinion, it would be better if the machine gun Kovrovsky Vladimirova -KPV was put on him! But, this is purely my opinion!
    1. 0
      25 June 2019 16: 11
      hi But what did the BTR / BMP 22/30 mm gun not suit?
      1. +3
        25 June 2019 16: 41
        What is the return of thirty? A few tons. Yes, and she weighs much more than a machine gun. Everything else should be - and guidance, and carriages, and .. In general, a completely different weight category
    2. +5
      25 June 2019 16: 40
      Quote: Thrifty
      it would be better to put on it a machine gun Kovrovsky Vladimirova-KPV!

      KPVT - overgrown machine gun and premature cannon. Either a 12,7 machine gun or a small-caliber gun. In the first case, we have a more or less decent CD, a small mass and a return, which is important for light carriers of this module

      The good news is that they did not stick RMB. That would be a complete seam ...
      Although, if you put the WGG, then maybe, maybe ...
    3. 0
      25 June 2019 16: 57
      Quote: Thrifty
      Purely my opinion, it would be better if the machine gun Kovrovsky Vladimirova -KPV was put on him! But, this is purely my opinion!

      Aerial targets firing distance, m
      1500.0
      Effective firing, m
      1600.0
      Maximum charge flight, m
      7000.0
      Body weight / with gun carriage / ammunition box, kg
      45.7 / 161.5 / 9.5 plus ammunition weight
      for armored personnel carriers will go, but for light armored cars a noticeable load
  3. +4
    25 June 2019 15: 27
    As various kinds of uninhabited modules fell out of the cornucopia, but it feels like it's a complete initiative. There is no order from the Ministry of Defense, there are no requirements, and their further fate only becomes more unclear.
  4. 0
    25 June 2019 15: 32
    If you can shoot drones, then a very useful thing.
    1. +2
      25 June 2019 16: 34
      Quote: Pashhenko Nikolay
      If you can shoot drones, then a very useful thing.

      machine-gun fire on drones is inefficient and requires a huge expenditure of ammunition
  5. -2
    25 June 2019 15: 34
    Not CROWS, of course, but it will do.
  6. +1
    25 June 2019 16: 11
    I think if you book or set the CPV, then the weight will greatly increase. For light equipment, like a tiger, you can become critical.
  7. +4
    25 June 2019 16: 18
    apparently - there is no barrel stabilization there. drive on three gears and two motors .. I wonder how effective the aiming will be when the module is in deviations along the axes? After all, the cars don’t stand perfectly perfectly, the roads again, gullies, bumps and potholes .. cause doubts and the handles of the control panel .. - you can’t completely grab them with your fingers, there are no corrugations on them, your hands can slip .. especially when moving .. under the right with my thumb, as I understand it, the joystick for turning and lifting, under the left - the shooting buttons? And where is the protection against the fool? Could a trigger with a hinged bracket with a lock .. again, did not have the patience to hide the cable under the face shield on the module? Why did they conduct wires from above so that they could be torn off with their first ricochet or crazy splinter?
    1. -2
      25 June 2019 16: 29
      As always, blinded from what was sad
      1. +3
        25 June 2019 16: 44
        Yes, I agree .. it was impossible to at least align all the elements and blocks horizontally? and mount on one carrier panel? Why should a central carrier of such a size with empty corners be attached to the photos of playboy girls? It can be completed by a third less .. Rawhide in general ..
  8. +1
    25 June 2019 16: 30
    Electronic geroscopes are now very compact. So everything depends on the power of software and electric motors. Stretched out or not. Although these cute steps are moving. And they could hide the cables.
  9. 0
    25 June 2019 16: 46
    Quote: APASUS
    the feeling that this is a complete initiative

    feelings let you down. the defense industry works only in advance.
  10. +1
    25 June 2019 17: 43
    Connoisseurs! 1,5 km is at an angle of 45 degrees and above. A smaller angle, mechanics at 2 km, with optics boldly throw another 500m, and in the mountains you can even 1000m. 1500m in the mountains was easily reached with RMB, but there is a lot of dispersion from the hands, the BP leaves to hit a single target (20-40 rounds).
    That's what they stuck in vain so it's a cloud. It was invented by the "enemy" -)) Its firing range is up to 300m, in short, you can only hide the enemy from yourself with smoke -)), "we know it swam." But they mold it on everything that has armor.
    That's where saving money and metal would be, but who, when the designer listened to the soldier -)) The last was Kalashnikov because he himself was a soldier, so that's why they can’t come up with anything better-))
    1. 0
      25 June 2019 18: 43
      That is, you swam, swam, but didn’t know what the Cloud was for?))) Apparently they swam in the wrong or wrong way)) The task of the smoke screen is, first of all, to hide armored vehicles for the duration of the maneuver, if the equipment is damaged, for evacuation crew or cars, to confuse anti-tank missiles with a laser guidance system, including the praised Javelins. Therefore they mold all the armor. And not at all in order to shoot at the enemy from smoke))
  11. 0
    25 June 2019 22: 27
    Recently, the role of various automatic rifles has grown sharply in the widest range of calibres, from 7,62 to 57 mm, due to the emergence of many highly maneuverable targets, from jihad vehicles to drones. Therefore, the appearance of such platforms is completely justified. It is only necessary to devote more time to barrel survivability and automatic or remotely controlled reloading.
  12. 0
    26 June 2019 20: 35
    I suggest to attach ATGM from the side of Narcissus (which one? - experienced specialists will come up with). Instead of Cord AGS (BC as much as possible). Infantry beat AGSom, armored vehicles from afar ATGM. good
  13. 0
    27 February 2023 23: 29
    Why is the box for cartridges and the unit with optics not covered with armor?!