- (en - 2024/05/05) London Plane in the Park Sanguszków, Tarnów, Lesser Poland, Poland
- (nl - 2024/05/05) Japanse wilde appel in de Groenhofstraat, Hengelo, Overijssel, Nederland
- (nl - 2024/05/05) Oosterse plataan in park Kalheupink, Oldenzaal, Overijssel, Nederland
- (nl - 2024/05/05) Coigüe in de tuin van de Heul 21 (privé) in Hoeven, Noord-Brabant, Nederland
- (nl - 2024/05/04) Weeping Willow 'Treurwilg' in the street Hild, Moergestel, North Brabant, Netherlands
- (nl - 2024/05/03) European Beech on the cemetery achter de Willibrorduskerk, Vilsteren, Overijssel, Netherlands
- (nl - 2024/05/02) Katsuraboom in de tuin van Rolklaver 70 (privé) in Rotterdam, Zuid-Holland, Nederland
- (nl - 2024/04/30) Giant Sequoia along the Salvatorstraat, Hasselt, Limburg, Belgium
- (fr - 2024/04/30) Néflier du Japon
- (en - 2024/04/30) Caucasian Spruce in the parc municipal, Nilvange, Moselle, France
- (fr - 2024/04/28) Figuier commun 'Ficus carica' en face de Moulouya à Zaio, Oriental, Maroc
- (en - 2024/04/28) Username
- (de - 2024/04/26) Tilia sp. close to the entrance of the Giebeleggstrasse, Giebelegg, Berna, Switzerland
- (en - 2024/04/24) Deodar Cedar in the arboretum Trompenburg, Rotterdam, South Holland, Netherlands
- (de - 2024/04/23) Drohnenfoto Waldtraut
- (en - 2024/04/23) Common Douglas-fir 'Waldtraut vom Mühlwald' in the Günterstäler Stadtwald, Freiburg im Breisgau, Baden-Württemberg, Germany
- (en - 2024/04/23) Danger to spammer!
- (en - 2024/04/22) Add new tree · MonumentalTrees.com
- (en - 2024/04/22) Add new tree · MonumentalTrees.com
- (en - 2024/04/22) Add new tree · MonumentalTrees.com
- (en - 2024/04/22) Add new tree · MonumentalTrees.com
- (en - 2024/04/22) European Silver Fir in the woods of "Las Lipowy Obrożyska" nature reserve, Muszyna, Lesser Poland, Poland
- (de - 2024/04/21) Common Douglas-fir 'Pascal' close to Restaurant St. Ottilien, Freiburg im Breisgau, Baden-Württemberg, Germany
- (fr - 2024/04/20) Nouveaux contributeurs
- (en - 2024/04/17) Upload photos · MonumentalTrees.com
- (fr - 2024/04/17) Arbres monumentaux à Bárcabo
- (en - 2024/04/15) Species determination help wanted
- (en - 2024/04/13) White Willow close to the halfverharde zijweg van de Hesselenweg, Horst aan de Maas, Limburg, Netherlands
- (en - 2024/04/13) Jelecote Pine in Winkworth Arboretum, Godalming, England, United Kingdom
- (en - 2024/04/13) White Poplar close to the San river, Stalowa Wola, Subcarpathian, Poland
- (en - 2024/04/12) Bur Oak on the private property of 25 Boem Ave, Scarborough, Ontario, Canada
- (nl - 2024/04/12) Bur Oak on the private property of 25 Boem Ave, Scarborough, Ontario, Canada
- (en - 2024/04/09) London Plane in the garden of estate Schlossgarten, Stetteldorf, Lower Austria, Austria
- (de - 2024/04/09) London Plane in the castle garden of Schloss Juliusburg, Stetteldorf am Wagram, Lower Austria, Austria
- (fr - 2024/04/09) Platane à feuilles d'érable sur le terrain de la Chateau de Chessy, Chessy, Seine-et-Marne, France
- (en - 2024/04/09) Camphor Tree at east end of Otis Allen Rd, north side of fork, Zephyrhills, Florida, United States
- (en - 2024/04/08) MonumentalTrees.com · an inventory of big and old trees worldwide
- (nl - 2024/04/08) Wild Cherry 'Il Magico Ciliegio' close to Cascina Casanesca, Besana Brianza, Lombardy, Italy
- (en - 2024/04/08) Karri 'Karri Knight' in the Valle de Canas, Valle de Canas, Centro, Portugal
- (fr - 2024/04/07) Frêne élevé près du Sao Bartolomeu dos Galegos à Lourinha, Centro, Portugal
- (fr - 2024/04/07) Frêne élevé près du Sao Bartolomeu dos Galegos à Lourinha, Centro, Portugal
- (en - 2024/04/07) Northern Red Oak in the Johann-Strauß-Weg, Klein Hehlen, Lower Saxony, Germany
- (en - 2024/04/07) Scots Pine in the Waldgebiet südlich vom Waldsee, Klein Hehlen, Lower Saxony, Germany
- (fr - 2024/04/05) Chêne pédonculé dans les fôrets du Gut Düendorf à Wunstorf, Basse-Saxe, Allemagne
- (en - 2024/04/04) MonumentalTrees.com · Search
- (en - 2024/04/04) MonumentalTrees.com · Search
- (nl - 2024/04/03) Olijfboom op Ano Vouves in Ano Vouves, Kreta, Griekenland
- (en - 2024/04/03) Add new tree · MonumentalTrees.com
- (en - 2024/04/03) Monterey Cypress on the cemetery ORTHEN, 's-Hertogenbosch, North Brabant, Netherlands
- (en - 2024/04/03) Tasmanian Blue Gum in a private garden along the Rue des Héros, Rocourt, Liège, Belgium
- (fr - 2024/04/02) Chêne vert 'Encina de las Tres Patas' sur la route du ermita de Santa Coloma, Mendaza, Comunidad Foral de Navarra, Espagne
- (nl - 2024/04/02) Coloradozilverspar 'Bollo de Berenboom' op het terrein van Scouting Burgemeester Welschen, Meerhoven, Noord-Brabant, Nederland
- (de - 2024/04/01) Sessile Oak 'Eiche an der Ziegelei nähe Seerosenteich' close to the Seerosenteich an der Wiese bei der alten Ziegelei, Schleife-Rohne, Saxony, Germany
- (en - 2024/03/31) Dawn Redwood in Prospect Cemetary, Toronto, Ontario, Canada
- (nl - 2024/03/31) Boomtoevoegen
- (fr - 2024/03/31) Ancien volcan du Pain de Sucre in Oloron, France
- (en - 2024/03/30) Pagoda Tree along the street Via Cassano, Cassano d'Adda, Lombardy, Italy
- (nl - 2024/03/29) Beuk in de tuin van Hoofdstraat 156 in Hillegom, Zuid-Holland, Nederland
- (fr - 2024/03/29) Quercus sp. 'Roblones del LLano del Toro' dans les fôrets du Tarna, Tarna, Principado de Asturias, Espagne
- (fr - 2024/03/29) Quercus sp. dans les fôrets du Tarna à Tarna, Principado de Asturias, Espagne
- (es - 2024/03/28) Añadir árbol · Árboles monumentales y singulares
- (es - 2024/03/28) Añadir árbol · Árboles monumentales y singulares
- (nl - 2024/03/27) Pedunculate Oak in a meadow near de Stapeldijk, Ruurlo, Gelderland, Netherlands
- (nl - 2024/03/27) Norway Spruce along Kluksgilet, Eitorn, Western Norway, Norway
- (en - 2024/03/26) Macedonian Pine in the park of Stourhead, Stourton, England, United Kingdom
- (nl - 2024/03/26) Mammoetbomen nabij het castel de Pont à Lesse in Dinant, Namen, België
- (de - 2024/03/25) P. subhirtella auf dem Gelände Kleiner Wiesenpark in Potsdam, Brandenburg, Deutschland
- (es - 2024/03/23) Stone Pine east of unknown location, Las Bayas, Comunidad Valenciana, Spain
- (en - 2024/03/21) Pūriri 'Taketakerau, Puriri' in the Hukutaia Domain, Opotiki, New Zealand, New Zealand
- (en - 2024/03/21) Paper Birch at the Rowallane Garden, Saintfield, Northern Ireland, United Kingdom
- (en - 2024/03/21) Mediterranean Cypress in Rostrevor House, Rostrevor, Northern Ireland, United Kingdom
- (en - 2024/03/21) Mexican Cypress in Rostrevor House, Rostrevor, Northern Ireland, United Kingdom
- (nl - 2024/03/21) Giant Sequoia at the royal estate Het Loo, Apeldoorn, Gelderland, Netherlands
- (en - 2024/03/20) White Mulberry 'Morusa v Borovciach I-1' along the street, Borovce, Trnava, Slovakia
- (en - 2024/03/20) Baldcypress in park Sonsbeek - Zijpendaal - Gulden Bodem, Arnhem, Gelderland, Netherlands
- (en - 2024/03/20) Quercus sp. along Littardweg, Neukirchen-Vluyn, North Rhine-Westphalia, Germany
- (en - 2024/03/20) Common Hazel at the end of the route forestière du Rouéchou, Oloron, Pyrénées-Atlantiques, France
- (nl - 2024/03/20) Oriental Plane in privétuin Kasteel Rechteren, Rechteren, Overijssel, Netherlands
- (en - 2024/03/20) 47-metre spruces
- (de - 2024/03/19) Leute gesucht
- (de - 2024/03/19) Baum existiert nicht mehr
- (nl - 2024/03/19) White Willow in the area Tussen pey en het gehucht 't hingen, Pey, Limburg, Netherlands
- (nl - 2024/03/19) White Willow in the area Tussen pey en het gehucht 't hingen, Pey, Limburg, Netherlands
- (en - 2024/03/19) Sitka Spruce 'Quinault Lake Spruce' close to Lake Quinault Resort, Lake Quinault, Washington, United States
- (en - 2024/03/19) Macedonian Pine in the park of Stourhead, Stourton, England, United Kingdom
- (en - 2024/03/18) Norway Spruce in Ootsipalu, Veriora vald, Põlvamaa, Estonia
- (de - 2024/03/17) Der Baum existiert nicht mehr
- (nl - 2024/03/17) Pedunculate Oak in the Gemeentebossen Ermelo, Ermelo, Gelderland, Netherlands
- (en - 2024/03/17) Macedonian Pine in the park of Stourhead, Stourton, England, United Kingdom
- (fr - 2024/03/17) Arbre aux concombres dans le ehem. Gutspark, Warbende (Nordwestuckermark), Brandebourg, Allemagne
- (fr - 2024/03/17) Cèdre de l'Atlas (Cedrus atlantica) en France
- (en - 2024/03/15) Macedonian Pine in the park of Stourhead, Stourton, England, United Kingdom
- (fr - 2024/03/14) Caucasian Zelkova in avenue Foch, Paris, Paris, France
- (en - 2024/03/14) Very interesting article on Giant Sequoias in the UK
- (nl - 2024/03/12) Norway Spruce south of Finede, Horn, Östergötland, Sweden
- (en - 2024/03/12) Norway Spruce close to Åselva, Suldal, Western Norway, Norway
- (en - 2024/03/12) Giant Sequoia 'Westlink Spire' on the private property of Brian in Wichita, Kansas, United States
- (en - 2024/03/12) Giant Sequoia 'Westlink Spire' on the private property of Brian in Wichita, Kansas, United States
- (en - 2024/03/12) MonumentalTrees.com · Register
- (en - 2024/03/11) Mountain Gum on the private grounds of the Willinghurst Estate, Cranleigh, England, United Kingdom
- (en - 2024/03/11) P. hybrid on the village green, Shamley Green, England, United Kingdom
- (fr - 2024/03/11) Chêne pédonculé dans le parc du the city of Tarnów on slopes of Góra
- (en - 2024/03/11) Norway Spruce along Kluksgilet, Eitorn, Western Norway, Norway
- (de - 2024/03/11) Eingriffeliger Weißdorn neben der Friedhof von Bouquetot in Bouquetot, Eure, Frankreich
- (nl - 2024/03/10) Leeftijd boom nadat hij is gekapt
- (nl - 2024/03/09) Common Lime 'The Twelve Apostles' in the Parkfield, Crumlin, Northern Ireland, United Kingdom
- (nl - 2024/03/09) Norway Spruce south of Mången, Gräsmark, Värmland, Sweden
- (nl - 2024/03/09) White Willow on the schoolplein, Arnhem, Gelderland, Netherlands
- (fr - 2024/03/09) European Beech in the parc des Bains, Lons-le-Saunier, Jura, France
- (en - 2024/03/05) European Beech close to the Riesbach südwestlich des Ortes, Apelern, Lower Saxony, Germany
- (nl - 2024/03/05) Monumentale bomen in het Zuiderpark in Den Haag, Zuid-Holland, Nederland
- (nl - 2024/03/05) Horse-chestnut close to the entrance of kasteel Born, Born, Limburg, Netherlands
- (en - 2024/03/04) Sessile Oak in the woods of Dane, Krujë, Durrës, Albania
- (nl - 2024/03/04) Southern Live Oak on the grounds of Spooner Farms, Iron City, Georgia, United States
- (en - 2024/03/04) Leska Valley in Risnjak National Park in Crni Lug, Croatia
- (en - 2024/03/03) Bunya pine
- (de - 2024/03/03) Holm Oak on the road of the col de Bavella- 600m, Zonza, Corse-du-Sud, France
- (nl - 2024/03/03) Hornbeam 'D'r Paddesjtool' along the Eyserweg, Trintelen, Limburg, Netherlands
- (en - 2024/02/27) Common Douglas-fir in Halfridge Wood in Bix, England, United Kingdom
- (nl - 2024/02/27) Scots Pine in the Leuvenumse Bos, Harderwijk, Gelderland, Netherlands
- (en - 2024/02/27) Common Whitebeam west of the village of Russells Water, Henley on Thames, England, United Kingdom
- (en - 2024/02/27) Abies sp. across from Diga delle Scalere, Castiglione dei Pepoli, Emilia-Romagna, Italy
- (nl - 2024/02/26) Monumentale bomen in Renswoude
- (en - 2024/02/25) Horse-chestnut in a meadow near Pheasants Hill in Hambleden, England, United Kingdom
- (nl - 2024/02/24) Spammers
- (en - 2024/02/24) Common Douglas-fir 'Highwayman' along highway 19, Qualicum Beach, British Columbia, Canada
- (en - 2024/02/23) Common Whitebeam west of the village of Russells Water, Henley on Thames, England, United Kingdom
- (fr - 2024/02/23) Hêtre dans la Forêt d'Issaux, Osse-en-Aspe, Pyrénées-Atlantiques, France
- (en - 2024/02/23) Horse-chestnut in a meadow near Pheasants Hill, Hambleden, England, United Kingdom
- (nl - 2024/02/23) Judgement on multistem
- (nl - 2024/02/23) Langs het julianakanaal in Maasbracht, Netherlands
- (nl - 2024/02/23) Langs het julianakanaal in Maasbracht, Netherlands
- (nl - 2024/02/23) Langs het julianakanaal in Maasbracht, Netherlands
- (nl - 2024/02/21) Monumentale bomen in het park van Waux-Hall in Grimbergen, Henegouwen, België
- (nl - 2024/02/17) Monumentale bomen Landgoed Backershagen, landgoederenroute in Wassenaar, Zuid-Holland, Nederland
- (nl - 2024/02/17) Amerikaanse eik in de Prinses Marielaan in Wassenaar, Zuid-Holland, Nederland
- (nl - 2024/02/17) Chinese balsempopulier langs de Van Zuylen van Nijeveltstraat in Wassenaar, Zuid-Holland, Nederland
- (en - 2024/02/15) "Quercus amplifolia"
- (de - 2024/02/11) How to get started?
- (en - 2024/02/10) European Beech along the river Derwent in Hagg Wood, Matlock Bath, England, United Kingdom
- (nl - 2024/02/02) Monumentale bomen in het arboretum Groenendaal in Hoeilaart, Vlaams-Brabant, België
- (nl - 2024/02/02) Spooner oak in Georgia
- (nl - 2024/01/28) Beuk Koningin Emmaplein in Rotterdam, Zuid-Holland, Nederland
- (nl - 2024/01/28) Witte paardenkastanje in de tuin van Parklaan 17 (privé), Rotterdam, Zuid-Holland, Nederland
- (nl - 2024/01/26) Kaukasische vleugelnoot in de tuin van Klein Amstelwijck, Amstelwijckseweg 14, Dordrecht, Zuid-Holland, Nederland
- (es - 2024/01/26) Comunidad
- (en - 2024/01/24) MonumentalTrees.com · an inventory of big and old trees worldwide
- (es - 2024/01/20) Revision of the genus Quercus in Spain and Portugal.
- (en - 2024/01/16) New website on European virgin forests
- (de - 2024/01/15) Eventuell ehemals geleitete Linde oder Tanzlinde im Park
- (en - 2023/12/29) Whaht is this
- (en - 2023/12/27) Rapid views accumulation
- (nl - 2023/12/24) Bergiep in het park van Trädgårdsföreningen, Trädgårdsföreningen, Västra Götaland, Zweden
- (nl - 2023/12/23) 15year anniversary.
- (de - 2023/12/22) Kommentar zurück: Browsereinstellung war falsch
- (de - 2023/12/22) Fehlerhafte Website
- (nl - 2023/12/20) Schietwilg in het park van de Singelwal, Zaltbommel, Gelderland, Nederland
- (nl - 2023/12/19) Schietwilg dichtbij de Stuw Asschat in Leusden, Utrecht, Nederland
- (en - 2023/12/18) Coast Redwood in Queens Wood, Christmas Common, England, United Kingdom
- (nl - 2023/12/17) Mammoetboom in het park Leeuwenstein, Nijmegen, Gelderland, Nederland
- (nl - 2023/12/15) Grove den bij de voormalige boerderij De Kousekiek in Leuvenum, Gelderland, Nederland
- (es - 2023/12/13) Árboles monumentales y singulares · un inventario de grandes y viejos árboles
- (nl - 2023/12/12) Monumentale bomen · een overzicht van grote en oude bomen
- (nl - 2023/12/10) Recente wijzigingen
- (en - 2023/12/10) Quercus sp. at the Area Archeologica di Caselle in Grosseto, Tuscany, Italy
- (en - 2023/12/09) Cadé in Reggio Emilia, Italy
- (nl - 2023/12/08) Someone changed a description
- (nl - 2023/12/08) Nieuw boek over Trompenburg door Gert Fortgens.
- (en - 2023/12/05) Common Douglas-fir on the East facing slope of the valley, Puckpits Inclosure, Acres Down, Near Minstead, England, United Kingdom
- (en - 2023/12/05) Sessile Oak in Windsor Great Park, Windsor, England, United Kingdom
- (en - 2023/11/30) Broken link
- (nl - 2023/11/29) Boomhoogte wordt niet goed weergegeven
- (en - 2023/11/28) New country Moldova
- (es - 2023/11/28) Castaño 'Castañeiro do maestro' en el pueblo, Pereda de Ancares, Castilla y León, España
- (es - 2023/11/28) Mas
- (en - 2023/11/28) New functionality
- (en - 2023/11/28) Bugfix
- (de - 2023/11/27) Platane im Wiener Volksgarten
- (de - 2023/11/27) Letzte Änderungen
- (fr - 2023/11/25) Arbres monumentaux dans le domaine du Rond Chêne à Esneux, Liège, Belgique
- (fr - 2023/11/25) Arbres monumentaux dans le domaine du Rond Chêne à Esneux, Liège, Belgique
- (de - 2023/11/23) Zucker-Kiefer
- (de - 2023/11/20) Baum nicht vorhanden 2
- (de - 2023/11/20) Baum nicht vorhanden
- (nl - 2023/11/19) Nieuw hoogterecord voor Nederland
- (de - 2023/11/14) Fotos nutzen
- (es - 2023/11/13) Araucaria de Chile 'The dragon princess' en Parque Nacional Tolhuaca en Victoria, Araucanía, Chile
- (fr - 2023/11/13) Discussion · Arbres monumentaux
- (nl - 2023/11/08) Nieuwe hortuaris in Trompenburg
- (nl - 2023/11/06) Monumentale bomen · een overzicht van grote en oude bomen
- (fr - 2023/11/06) Discussion · Arbres monumentaux
- (fr - 2023/11/06) Chêne rouge d'Amérique près du Savage Camping Station, Savage Gulf, Tennessee, États-Unis
- (fr - 2023/11/06) Chêne rouge d'Amérique près du Savage Camping Station, Savage Gulf, Tennessee, États-Unis
- (fr - 2023/11/06) Kapokier 'Lupuna' près du de Comunidad Nativa Independencia à Iquitos, Loreto, Pérou
- (fr - 2023/11/06) Kapokier près du Piedras Blancas National Park, La Gamba, Pacific Coast, Costa Rica
- (en - 2023/11/05) Add new tree · MonumentalTrees.com
- (de - 2023/11/05) Baum hinzufügen · Monumentale Bäume
- (nl - 2023/11/04) Test
- (nl - 2023/11/03) Dakspaaneik aan de Drietak in Ophoven, Limburg, België
- (en - 2023/11/03) Sitka Spruce close to Dydland, Sokndal, Western Norway, Norway
- (en - 2023/10/31) Q. arkansana
- (es - 2023/10/30) Árboles monumentales y singulares · Registrarse
- (en - 2023/10/30) Lebanon Cedar in Highstreet in Caterham, England, United Kingdom
- (nl - 2023/10/29) Joining comunuty?
- (de - 2023/10/29) Eindrückliche Hagebuche
- (en - 2023/10/29) Jackfruit
- (en - 2023/10/29) The thickest, tallest, and oldest trees in Australia
- (en - 2023/10/29) Bristlecone pine
- (en - 2023/10/29) The oldest trees worldwide
- (de - 2023/10/29) A. squamata
- (de - 2023/10/29) A. squamata
- (de - 2023/10/29) A. squamata
- (de - 2023/10/29) Bilder von Weiß-Fichten (Picea glauca)
- (de - 2023/10/29) Weiß-Fichte
- (de - 2023/10/29) Grannen-Kiefer
- (de - 2023/10/29) Bilder von Grannen-Kiefern (Pinus aristata)
- (de - 2023/10/29) Bilder von Riesen-Eukalypten (Eucalyptus regnans)
- (de - 2023/10/29) Riesen-Eukalyptus
- (de - 2023/10/29) Edel-Tanne (Typ-Art)
- (de - 2023/10/29) Edel-Tanne
- (de - 2023/10/29) Bilder von Gemeine Fichten (Picea abies)
- (de - 2023/10/29) Bilder von Gemeine Fichten (Picea abies)
- (de - 2023/10/29) Bilder von Zucker-Kiefern (Pinus lambertiana)
- (de - 2023/10/29) Europäische Eibe 'Fortingall Yew' in der churchyard, Fortingall, Scotland, Vereinigten Königreich
- (de - 2023/10/29) Bilder von P. palustris (Pinus palustris)
- (en - 2023/10/29) Photos of Longleaf Pines (Pinus palustris)
- (de - 2023/10/29) Baumarten, welche hier aufgeführt werden
- (en - 2023/10/29) Q. acerifolia
- (nl - 2023/10/28) New country Sierra Leone
- (nl - 2023/10/28) Sierra Leone
- (nl - 2023/10/28) Website update
- (en - 2023/10/28) Common Douglas-fir at Brummit Creek, Brummit Creek, Oregon, United States
- (de - 2023/10/27) Winter-Linde in der Nähe der Am Frauenberg, Pleinting, Bayern, Deutschland
- (de - 2023/10/27) Baum hinzufügen · Monumentale Bäume
- (nl - 2023/10/27) Moeraseik in het park van landgoed Het Laar in Ommen, Overijssel, Nederland
- (de - 2023/10/25) Höchster Baum der Welt: Der Küstenmammutbaum
- (en - 2023/10/24) Western Redcedar in the woods of Västra Tunhem, Västra Tunhem, Västra Götaland, Sweden
- (en - 2023/10/19) Common Ash (Fraxinus excelsior) "25171" - wie alt ist dieser Baum?
- (en - 2023/10/19) Discussion page of Tom
- (en - 2023/10/15) American Elm on the private property of James and Lottie Bibza located at 831 N. Liberty Road in Grove City, Pennsylvania, United States
- (es - 2023/10/14) Fotos de Nardo
- (en - 2023/10/12) Bald Cypress in Australia
- (nl - 2023/10/08) Hollandse linde op het terrein van Duinrell, Wassenaar, Zuid-Holland, Nederland
- (nl - 2023/10/01) Grappig toeval en welkom
- (en - 2023/09/29) Sycamore Maple 'Sycamore Gap Tree or Robin Hood Tree' close to Once Brewed in Hexham, England, United Kingdom
- (en - 2023/09/29) Map only for developer use
- (nl - 2023/09/29) Smalbladige es in het Zocherpark, Utrecht, Utrecht, Nederland
- (nl - 2023/09/29) Adding new tree
- (es - 2023/09/29) Sycamore Gap tree at Hadrian's Wall cut down by 'vandals'
- (nl - 2023/09/27) Gele paardenkastanje in het Zocherpark, Utrecht, Utrecht, Nederland
- (nl - 2023/09/24) Beuk op de begraafplaats Groenesteeg, Leiden, Zuid-Holland, Nederland
- (nl - 2023/09/21) Overscribing measurement of others.
- (en - 2023/09/21) Monumental trees in the United States
- (nl - 2023/09/20) Kapokboom 'Kayu Putih, Árbol antiguo de Bayan' ten noorden van Ubud o Canggu in Bayan Banjar, Bali, Indonesië
- (nl - 2023/09/18) Monumentale bomen · een overzicht van grote en oude bomen
- (en - 2023/09/13) Scarlet Oak 'La Quercia scarlatta' at the Giardini Reali, Monza, Lombardy, Italy
- (fr - 2023/09/06) Saule blanc dans le domaine Provinciaal Domein Rivierenhof, Deurne, Anvers, Belgique
- (fr - 2023/09/03) Arbres monumentaux à Nay
- (nl - 2023/09/03) Monumentale bomen · Zoeken
- (nl - 2023/09/02) Communucatie
- (nl - 2023/09/02) Toevoegen nieuwe ondersoort lukt niet
- (es - 2023/09/01) Árboles monumentales y singulares · un inventario de grandes y viejos árboles
- (en - 2023/08/28) Add new tree · MonumentalTrees.com
- (en - 2023/08/27) Add new tree · MonumentalTrees.com
- (en - 2023/08/27) Add new tree · MonumentalTrees.com
- (en - 2023/08/27) Norway Spruces in Junebäckens källor naturreservat in Jönköping, Jönköping, Sweden
- (en - 2023/08/27) Pedunculate Oak 'Great Witley Oak' on private farmland near Great Witley in Great Witley, England, United Kingdom
- (nl - 2023/08/25) Zwepen en netelboom
- (en - 2023/08/24) Profile of Haavar
- (nl - 2023/08/24) Zomerlinde 'Tilia x europaea' op het dorpsplein, Massemen, Oost-Vlaanderen, België
- (nl - 2023/08/24) Zomerlinde 'Tilia x europaea' op het dorpsplein in Massemen, Oost-Vlaanderen, België
- (nl - 2023/08/23) Q. × ludoviciana in de Royal Botanic Gardens, Kew, Engeland, Verenigd Koninkrijk
- (nl - 2023/08/21) Boom gezocht
- (en - 2023/08/20) Height records are outdated.
- (en - 2023/08/15) Common Douglas-fir close to C Branch Rd in Sayward, British Columbia, Canada
- (nl - 2023/08/15) Sequoia Chateau Bleu struck by lightning
- (nl - 2023/08/12) Monumentale bomen · een overzicht van grote en oude bomen
- (es - 2023/08/11) Cantabrian brown bear cub captured with photo-trap.
- (nl - 2023/08/11) Functie toevoegen foto's locatie of groep bomen werkt niet meer
- (nl - 2023/08/06) Beuk op het domein van landgoed museum Voorlinden, Wassenaar, Zuid-Holland, Nederland
- (nl - 2023/08/05) Douglasspar in de Uddeler Heegde, Uddel, Gelderland, Nederland
- (nl - 2023/08/02) Westelijke levensboom in het park van landgoed Clingendael, Wassenaar, Zuid-Holland, Nederland
- (en - 2023/07/31) Sitka Spruce in Downhill forest in Castlerock, Northern Ireland, United Kingdom
- (nl - 2023/07/30) Hongaarse eik aan de Rue des Chenes in LD Le Pérou, Charente-Maritime, Frankrijk
- (en - 2023/07/29) Threat of vandalism on this site, and other bugs
- (nl - 2023/07/28) Interessant (gaatjes in bomen)
- (en - 2023/07/27) Persian Walnut in the garden of the 45, avenue Général Leclerc, Capbreton, Landes, France
- (en - 2023/07/21) Cultivars of the giant sequoia
- (nl - 2023/07/21) Beuk in het park Hoekenburg, Voorburg, Zuid-Holland, Nederland
- (en - 2023/07/14) More than 100 m tall cypress in Tibet
- (nl - 2023/07/14) Acer monspessulanum in de Doelentuin
- (en - 2023/07/14) MonumentalTrees.com · Register
- (nl - 2023/07/14) Spaanse aak in de Doelentuin, Delft, Zuid-Holland, Nederland
- (en - 2023/07/14) Add new tree · MonumentalTrees.com
- (en - 2023/07/08) Sweet Mock-orange at the castle-park complex,
- (en - 2023/07/06) Storm Poly
- (es - 2023/06/28) State of the extreme drought in Spain.
- (nl - 2023/06/25) Zomerlinde nabij het kasteel Wolfrath, Holtum, Limburg, Nederland
- (nl - 2023/06/25) Blossom periods
- (nl - 2023/06/24) Smalbladige es langs de van Goghstraat-Vermeerstraat, Zoetermeer, Zuid-Holland, Nederland
- (en - 2023/06/24) Western red cedar deserves a spot among the "monumental tree species"
- (nl - 2023/06/23) Amberboom in het Cantonspark, Baarn, Utrecht, Nederland
- (en - 2023/06/18) Highest altitude trees discovered in UK
- (fr - 2023/06/15) Platane à feuilles d'érable près de la Pointe des Vergnes (Lac de Soustons), Soustons, Landes, France
- (fr - 2023/06/14) Platane à feuilles d'érable 'Platano bifido' dans le parc de la Villa Litta-Modignani, Milano, Lombardie, Italie
- (fr - 2023/06/14) Platane à feuilles d'érable 'Platano bifido' dans le parc de la Villa Litta-Modignani, Milano, Lombardie, Italie
- (en - 2023/06/14) Acer sp. in the area Monte Cesima, Mignano Montelungo, Campania, Italy
- (nl - 2023/06/14) Profiel van StevenJansen
- (en - 2023/06/13) Box trees (Buxus sempervirens) in the United Kingdom
- (nl - 2023/06/12) Haagbeuk in W.A. Scholtenlaan 65 in Doorwerth, Gelderland, Nederland
- (en - 2023/06/12) Moreton Bay Fig 'Fig - Moreton Bay' west of Bellingen ( 7 Kms) en Dorrigo Rd in Bellingen, Mainland Australia, Australia
- (en - 2023/06/12) Bunya in the garden of Pazo de Gandarón, Salcedo, Galicia, Spain
- (nl - 2023/06/11) Valse Christusdoorn in het kasteelpark Arenberg (KULeuven), Heverlee, Vlaams-Brabant, België
- (en - 2023/06/11) Add new tree · MonumentalTrees.com
- (en - 2023/06/10) Strawberry-tree in Tower Wood (Killarney National Wood) in Killarney, Munster, Ireland
I've asked the retired hortuaris of Trompenburg what he thinks. He has introduced a variety of Nothofagus in Trompenbrg.
Thanks!
Our hundred years old Cedar is reaching it's final phase. Storm Eunice caused a lot of breaking branches in 2022 in the, until then, beautiful tree. Rotting wounds made the tree unsafe . Therefore we decided in 2024 to cut down the crown. The stem can now slowly rot away and be food for insects and soil life.
Second part:
Tree with history.
The Cedar planted in 1928 got damaged earlier in 1961. In those days the stem was scratched out and filled with concrete. The wound closed slowly. If you have a good look at it you'll still see the concrete inside. Nowadays we leave the trees at ease. The tree is perfectly capable of healing it's own wounds.
Sorry for the typing errors. I have to be more careful in finishing a text. I'll correct them.
dein Drohnenfoto von Waldtrauts Spitze findet Beachtumng, kannst du mehr dazu sagen?
https://www.monumentaltrees.com/de/fotos/163720/#c
https://www.monumentaltrees.com/de/fotos/163070/#c
Grüße
Karlheimz
Judging by the flowering and cone production, the tree looks severely stressed now and looks to have reached its max height!?
The soil compaction in the photos around the tree base has not helped. In the UK once a tall tree is made publicly aware a notice is placed at its base, people visit, soil compaction and tree decline is the end result!
I prefer to keep trees out out the public eye to avoid this. But happy to upload here.
I imagine climate change is having a big impact now on mainland European forests?
I would still put my money on tallest trees in Europe being in Wales or Scotland. Which number in the hundreds now over 60m.
The race is on!
Good point about compaction from increased visitors, though.
I am worried that climate change is going to push suitability further and further northwest for Pacific coast species in Europe.
Great drone shot!
I am worried that climate change is going to push suitability further and further northwest for Pacific coast species in Europe.
Great drone shot!
species name - mangifera indica
circumference - 6.92 m
age of tree - 400 years approx
country - India
zone - Central$768
state - Uttarakhand
district - Pauri Garhwal
development section - Pauri
village - Kamand
location - approx 12 k.m. from district head quarter
(pauri - srinagar road via gadoli-khandah road)
Central$768
species name - mangifera indica
circumference - 6.92 m
age of tree - 400 years approx
country - India
zone - Central$768
state - Uttarakhand
district - Pauri Garhwal
development section - Pauri
village - Kamand
location - approx 12 k.m. from district head quarter
(pauri - srinagar road via gadoli-khandah road)
species name - mangifera indica
circumference - 6.92 m
age of tree - 400 years approx
country - India
zone - central
state - Uttarakhand
district - Pauri Garhwal
development section - Pauri
village - Kamand
location - approx 12 k.m. from district head quarter
(pauri - srinagar road via gadoli-khandah road)
species name - mangifera indica
circumference - 6.92 m
age of tree - 400 years approx
country - India
zone - central
state - Uttarakhand
district - Pauri Garhwal
development section - Pauri
village - Kamand
location - approx 12 k.m. from district head quarter
(pauri - srinagar road via gadoli-khandah road)
"Ist Waldtraut noch der höchste Baum Deutschlands? Ein Freiburger hat einen höheren gefunden"
Ich nehme die Meldung ernst. Er hat Waldtraut gemessen und hat damit eine Vergleichsmöglichkeit. Die wahre Höhe eines hohen Baumes im Waldverbund erkennt man nicht durch bloße Betrachtung, das geht nur durch konkrete Messung, und da gibt es noch sehr viel zu messen!
Wer zum Beispiel an Waldtraut vorbei spazieren geht und auch zur Spitze hochschaut würde ohne entsprechenden Hinweis nie auf die Idee kommen, das könnte der höchste Baum Deutschlands sein. So ist es nur eine Frage der Zeit, bis höhere entdeckt werden. Vielleicht geht es schneller, wenn man durch flächendeckende LIDAR-Messung weiß, wo es sich lohnt zu suchen.
Es gilt also jetzt, den genauen Standort zu ermitteln (die zur Zeit eigetragenen Koordinaten dürften fiktiv sein) und die Messung zu überprüen.
Die Badische Zeitung hat auch die Telefonnummern ihrer Redakteure veröffentlicht - falls da per E-Mail nichts kommen sollte:
Hannah Steiert (hast)
Telefon: 0761/496-9727
E-Mail: steiert@badische-zeitung.de
Ich hab den Eindruck, er wird jeden Interessierten gern zu allen seinen Bäumen führen. Koordinaten habe ich nicht, aber er spricht von 500 m Entfernung von Pascal und Rapunzel zu St. Ottilien, und die könnten wunderbar von drei Wegen aus eingesehen werden - also das verspricht eine leichte Messung!
Ich checke schon meinen Kalender, ob ich mal eben nach Freiburg fahre ...
Mit der Radtour bin ich dann wohl außen vor - also wünsch ich Dir eine tolle Entdeckungstour mit David und warte ab, bis Du die neuen Rekordbäume dokumentiert hast! Gern würde ich aber mal hinzukommen, wenn David das vorführt, alle Einzelheiten interessieren mich. Vielleicht könnte er Triton noch mal besteigen und mit meinem 100m-Metall-Bandmaß einen noch genaueren Messwert erzielen. Noch spannend für mich ist die Frage, wie er den Rest des Baumes vom Bandmaß bis zur Spitze mißt.
Meter weniger raus kriege als die mit Nikon messenden Leute. Werden abwarten müssen bis der Herr Pfeifer mit seinen Lehrlingen und hochwertigen Landvermessergeräten ein neues Ergebnis bringt.
Die Messung hier wurde korrigiert. Eine Neue Douglasie habe ich angelegt. Ein anderer 66er, lt. meiner Messung, war hier schon von euch angelegt. Da habe ich eben eine neue Messung hinzugefügt. Dem Herr Koch legte ich nahe sich auch ein einfaches Nikon-Gerät zuzulegen, dann kann er auf die "Jagd" gehen und sich wieder melden wenn er was gefunden hat 🙂
Dieses Drohnenfoto gibt mir keine Information preis über das Aufnahmedatum und die verwendete Drohne/Drohnenkamera. Mich würde sehr interessieren, ob man mit Hilfe einer Drohne einen genaueren Höhenmesswert hinkriegt. Ich stelle mir vor, man positioniert die Drohne nahe und genau in Höhe der Spitze und misst dann mit unseren Lasern auf die Drohne. Dann hätte man einen präziseren Reflexionspunkt als von der natürlichen Spitze und man erhielte einen genaueren Messwert.
PS this photo has a cc-by-sa license, so it can be uploaded here. You need to state the source and license, and say who took it, that is all.
Thank you so much
As of april 10 , 2024 have
Managed to prevent cutting or
Removal of the tree
There is an online pettion to save this marvel
Of nature for future generations @ https://www.change.org/p/protect-250-yr-old-historic-bur-oak-5-m-trunk-circumference-in-toronto
The city to get historical protected tree status
For the bur oak of 25 boem
159cms or 63 inches - 5.2 ft
Height ( height not officially measured
Thought to be 30metres or 97.4 ft )
You have chosen "Laser with Three-point measurement". Could you please explain, how did you measure the tree? Which instrument did you use?
Regards
Kouta
Always nice to talk with you,
I was just about posting about this topic!
Using a lumberjack's cross or a common forestry laser (i had a trupulse 200L) is the same : Distance to the tree / angle to bottom / angle to top = Tangente method : Easy but subject to operator's aiming and parralax errors (deviation between top and bottom).
The Sine method (frequently seen on the measurements description) means you get the distance to the bottom and the distance to the top. It's more accurate (no influence of the tilt of the tree) but you need to "touch" the top wih your laser (so far, few forestry laser offer this option).
Sine method gives statistically lower heights, due to this "need" of consistent "material" to point at.
I'm consequently very interested in all community's experiences about shooting right!
We tried once to use the Sine method with a Leica Disto D8 aiming to a target hold by a climber at the top, to compare several method. Measurements were closer to the climbing ones but still not so accurate :)
Regards,
Bertrand
(After reading, Nikon forestry pro 2 offers both methods : Sine (2points) and Tangente (3 points). Most of the others lasers have only tangente method in routine)
I asked that because you have also added tape measurements on MT, so I thought maybe you have accidentally chosen a wrong method.
Wit Disto D8 it is almost impossible to get response from tree top. Its laser beam is too weak. Most measurers still use Nikon lasers, but today there are also other brands, like Chinese Suaoki, Huepar HLR1000, Boblov NK-1000 and Polish Yato YT-73129. TruPulse lasers are more expensive and accurate.
There are very few Quercus robur of over 35 m growing outside forests or at least forest-parks anywere in Europe.
Rainer has a list of over 1200 oaks in Germany of over 6 m circumference. Of these the tallest is 38 m.
Regards, Jeroen
BTW, I will have some to add to the list for Belgium. Thank you.
Bonjour, Est-ce que quelqu’un connaît la localisation du plus grand hêtre du monde, qui parait-il se trouve dans la Forêt de Soignes en Belgique?
Pour info, j’ai quelques arbres à ajouter pour la liste belge. Merci
Beatrice Spates
BTW, I will have some to add to the list for Belgium. Thank you.
Bonjour, Est-ce que quelqu’un connaît la localisation du plus grand hêtre du monde, qui parait-il se trouve dans la Forêt de Soignes en Belgique?
Pour info, j’ai quelques arbres à ajouter pour la liste belge. Merci
I measured the circumference around the beginning of March 2024, at 1.30 m height as explained here. It was 2.06 m.
I would like to add a few more details.
Thanks for your comments. Funny thing .. my first guess was Cupressus macrocarpa 'Lutea'. I was not sure, so I asked someone else for his opinion . He tolded me that Cupressus macrocarpa is not "Winter proof" in The Netherlands, so it probably is "Cupressus x leylandii". I will ask him again.
Rgds, Nardo
https://plants.westonnurseries.com/12130019/Plant/9029/Gold_Rider_Leyland_Cypress
or
https://appeltern.nl/nl/tuinadvies/plantenencyclopedie/%C3%97_cupressocyparis_leylandii_gold_rider_bastaard_cypres
Is there perhaps another 'simple' way to check what kind of tree it is?
For definitive identification, look for cones. Over 2 cm long = Cupressus macrocarpa; under 2 cm long = Cupressus × leylandii.
This is definitely Cupressus macrocarpa! Big trees can be found all the way up in Scotland, granted they do have the benefits microclimates up there, but there is no reason to suggest that a young tree like this cannot survive in the Netherlands, especially with climate change.
I would agree that Cupressus x leylandii 'Gold Rider' is similarly spiky, but it still looks too wispy looking in my opinion for this tree to be one.
Check the cones when you next visit to be certain.
Today I visited the tree again and found some cones. All fullgrown cones were more than 2cm in lenght upto almost 3cm, so it must be a Cupressus macrocarpa. I changed it on MT.
Regards, Nardo
But I would not expect the tree to grow this rapidly at 50° N. I wouldn't even expect that it could survive our winters. This winter we had up to -10 °C...
I remember one of these in a garden in Bangor, Wales, when I was at university; I measured it, 14 m tall. I asked the gardeners how old it was. They said it was 6, or 7, they couldn't remember which.
Would you expect the leaves to survive, if they had been frozen in a cold night?
So I go for a thermal optimum at night between 1 m and 8 m high approx.
gr
Jeroen
Os sugiero si podeis verificar el correcto funcionamiento de la web, porque parece ser que finalmente he podido comprobar que se crea correctamente el registro del arbol pero se va duplicando y asi quedan vacias varias fichas de arboles, porque al aparecer un mensaje de error, ello a muchos usuarios nos hace pensar que no funciona y lo volvemos a repetir. Gracias, Raul Agullo Coves
Un fuerte abrazo y muchas gracias de nuevo por vuestra web y gran trabajo de divulgacion, que nos estimula especialmente como herramienta didactica para incentivar la conservacion de arboles monumentales en nuestro entorno local que es donde mas podemos influir a nuestros amigos, familiares, conocidos y ciudadanos.
A ver si Tim, el administrador y fundador de la web ve tu mensaje y le echa un vistazo pero suele estar muy liado. De todos modos es uno de los encantos que tiene esta página, suele dar algún problemilla. Se ha convertido en una gran base de datos y no hay presupuesto, supongo que es por este motivo.
¡Un saludo!
Hälsningar från Ulrik, also known as Sarevok in the skogsforum-site
Now it maybe is even higher than Estonia's highest norway spruce which they say is around 50.4 metres tall.
all the tall Norway spruces which exist in Eitorn? They must have grown quite a bit in height.
Can you then go to Estonia and measure that country's tallest Norway spruce? This one must have grown quite a bit in height too.
THEN WE FINALLY KNOW WHAT Norway Spruce that is the tallest in Scandinavia!!
Finally. Remember to measure the tallest scots pine in Estonia too, it only like 200 metres away from Estonia's tallest Norway Spruce.
I checked the site here on monumental trees, the site says Estonia has a record tall norway spruce that is 48.6 metres tall and a record tall scots pine that is 46.6 metres tall. So you have checked Estonias Norway spruces with Lidar? I would definitely go there if I had your job and if those 2 record trees still existed in Estonia.
Hälsningar
The Scots pine in Estonia that they said was 46.6 metres, how tall was the scots pine in the lidar When the Scots pine still existed in the Lidar?
https://www.google.com/maps/@57.9126071,27.317464,3a,90y,345.4h,128.13t/data=!3m6!1e1!3m4!1sAF1QipOeYGoe8_zJwqMc4om2YW7noZJWB4H6v3XaBrwz!2e10!7i7296!8i3648?entry=ttu
You would also say so right? That this estonia Norway spruce never got taller than the Mölnbacka spruce.
But if this Esotnian norway spruce somehow has survived to this date, how much do you think it has grown per year from 2015 to this date?
And what about the scots pine? how much do you think it has grown from 2015 to now?
The pine too is difficult. The pines looked like they were in great condition in 2019. Also the pines are much more impressive than the Norway spruce to me. Just insane ones. I would assume the tallest should be 48-49 today maybe, although that's mostly guessing.
Eller har du nån bättre metod att hitta rätt träd när du åker till platsen där ett träd finns?
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=URD2X5DeK34
It does look like it might have fallen in a gale before the stump was tidied up. But see what they say 👍
in my last entry I changed the tree species to: Prunus subhirtella 'Acculade'. After that an error message was displayed preventing further entries. Can you please switch this off?
best regards Frank
Es la consecuencia de no tener todavía aprobado un catálogo municipal de árboles singulares a fecha de 23 de Marzo de 2024, y una sencilla ordenanza o similar normativa municipal para fomentar su conservación y divulgación como herramienta de gran valor educativo sobre los valores naturales del entorno ciudadano.
As an aside, C. benthamii is distinct from C. lusitanica in genetics; in all probability, "C. lusitanica" may turn out to comprise multiple species, as it has never been examined on a range-wide basis (think like the old "C. arizonica" now split into 5 or 6 species).
The position is also slightly out, I'll correct that now.
Je comprends vos remarques, cependant c'est volontairement que j'ai classé ce noisetier comme mono-tronc, car jusqu'à 45 cm de hauteur moyenne au-dessus du sol, sur tous les côtés j'ai constaté que ce ne sont pas plusieurs troncs accolés, remplis à l'intérieur d'un mélange de terre et de feuilles séchées, mais bien un gros tronc ligneux et sans crevasses verticales majeures, assez lisse même, sur lequel et autour duquel viennent se rattacher de nombreuses branches, dont je n'ai pas tenu compte dans ma mesure. Je n'ai mesuré que ce tronc basal lisse et ligneux, compact, constatable sur tous les côtés. La photo de la base montre mal tout cela, je l'avoue. Dès que je pourrai je retournerai sur place et prendrai plusieurs photos supplémentaires, et après, vous jugerez... Je ne me vexerai pas si vous le considérez comme multi-tronc, don't worry !
DBZT
if you aim me in your last comment, I can tell you I'm not a scientist, nor an universitarian. My job was consisting in making plugs in drilling cores and maintenance of a core stock. I am only passionate for botanics from my youngest years, in amateur.
DBZT
I took new photos yesterday ; tell me what you think about it. Thanks
Why did you add new measurements for the 47-metre spruces? I understand that you wanted to correct 47.02 -> 47.20 but in such case you should correct the former measurement, instead of adding a new one. In case you don't have enough rights to edit a measurement, please ask somebody to do that. You refer to the measurements made by F. Melakari. I suppose you have not measured the trees by yourself?
Regars
Kouta
Yes, i refer everything to Fredrik Melakari. I haven't measured the trees myself.
In the 47.02 site I gave a video as source of the tree. I heard that absolutely all those 3 Norway Spruces in that video have died.
Leute im Raum Wien oder NIederösterreich die gerne Bäume fotografieren
ich bin immer alleine
wer macht noch sowas?
der da
https://www.monumentaltrees.com/de/aut/niederosterreich/wienumgebung/5820_beugenau/11491/
http://www.flickr.com/photos/lesley_sutherland/6235601680/ http://www.flickr.com/photos/pspahn/2613954984/
The original top has snapped a long time ago, but the tree is still almost 60 m tall. Otherwise the tree is, as far as I remember, in a good shape.
Still more than this tree, I liked neighbouring Olympic National Park. One of the greatest park I have hiked. A primeval wilderness with giant Douglas-firs, Sitka spruces and western redcedars, wild rivers and snow-capped mountains.
Kouta
So you have been there and I advertised the park needlessly!
Kouta
Vinca Veche. During research, a romanian discovered a spruce which is 62.5 meters high and maybe is the tallest in Romania at present. The measurements were performed with a digital ultrasonic hypsometer. The previous record is a 61.5 meter long spruce in the Penteleus forest in the Buzău area, discovered by Professor Ion Popescu-Zeletin.
Do these picea abieses still exists? where they taken down? if the spruces were measured, where they longer than the 62,26 metre spruce in slovenia? How tall were they?
There is a Norway Spruce called 'Vlado' at the Perucica Forest Reserve, Sutjeska National Park, Republika Srpska, in Bosnia and Herzegovina. The top of this tree has been broken off in the past, the tree has been taller even before this happened. How tall do you think this norway spruce was before the top broke off?
In two days among many spruces only 5 trees were measured with a height of over 55 m in this forest reserve, but it is not impossible there are some spruces of 60 m or more. The best way to find these is to make a LiDAR survey of the whole forest.
Have a mission been made to measure as many trees as possible there? or is there still an unexplored area there that could have norway spruces above 60 metres?
The "62.5-metre" tree in Sinca Veche is not spruce but silver fir (Abies alba). The measurement was made by the Romanian University of Suceava. Mr. Ghircoias from the local forestry office brought me to the tree in 2019. I measured it with TruPulse 200X laser and it was only 51.7 m. Mr. Ghircoias (and I) was very disappointed. This clearly shows how unreliable the ultrasonic hypsometers are when measuring single trees, and it is incredible that still today many university researchers don't understand how an ultrasonic hypsometer functiones and why it does not give accurate tree heights. The tree is also on MT here:
https://www.monumentaltrees.com/en/rou/bucharest-ilfov/brasov/20789_codriisecularidelasincaveche/38921/
The researchers also "measured" a beech more than 50 m in height. I did not get an accurate height because of very dense canopy but anyway it is not much more than 40 m. However, I measured a very tall 48.10-metre beech which the researchers have not noticed at all, although it is clearly visible from the trail.
https://www.monumentaltrees.com/en/rou/bucharest-ilfov/brasov/20789_codriisecularidelasincaveche/41863/
I have not see the "Vlado" tree. As Jeroen, Michael and Vlado measured it, I was alone in another part of the reserve. Next year I was not there at all. So I can say nothing about the "Vlado" tree.
In Biogradska Gora, there is definitely potential for 60+ m tree and still many unexplored locations as far as I know.
I measured the "Vlado"spruce in 2012 and 2013. How tall it has been before the top broke off I cannot say but it is not impossible the tree originally was around 60 m tall.
Jeroen
I also read somewhere that a picea abies that was 62 metres high had fallen in bosnia, is this true? if so, that was not a tree very far away in height compared to sgermova smreka.
Jeroen, kouta.
With a fallen 62-metre spruce in Bosnia, you likely mean the tallest of the "three sisters" in Perucica. Very unreliable height. The other two "sisters" were much lower than the park administration claimed. In addition, Prof. Leibundgut and Prof. Pintaric reported a 63-metre spruce in Perucica, Bosnia. (It was not the "sister" because they described an entirely different growing site.) However, also this measurement is very unreliable for two reasons. Firstly, as is old, from the fifties, it has definitely been done with tangent method which usually results in over-measurements. Secondly, the figures by Leibundgut & Pintaric are unreliable anyway because they give different numbers in each of their publications.
kouta, i sent this question to that guy u mentioned too.
and why not make a lase-scan of high tree-points in that forest where he found such a tree?
https://www.monumentaltrees.com/en/hrv/adriatic/likasenj/29039_jezera/53875/
Read the description. I think there are not equally tall trees in that reserve. It is a relatively small reserve and the rangers likely know it well. Thus, a laser scan would not help.
In what year was the top broken off from that epic tree that maybe was taller than the sgerm-spruce?
Extremely tall norway spruces in scandinavia usually grow about 0.2 meters per year. So i would guess the spruce is 50.4 meters tall today. What do you say to that?
Anyhow my friend, I would really thank you if you could travel to Estonia and measure the talles norway spruce and scots pine in Estonia. Has the Norway spruce in Estonia finally become taller than 50 metres?
And how old do you think the scots pine is? The one that was measured in 2015.
Could we end this discussion under the large Sitka spruce. These topics have nothing to do with the American Sitka spruce. If you want to discuss about the Estonian trees, please go to the Estonian spruce or pine and click "Comment" (top right).
Regards
Kouta
But looking at the front edge of the stump, appearing all twisted, I'm suspecting more it may have blown down before it was cut. The decay in the entire central area is very obvious.
I guess that this tree is 50,2 metres tall today.
Fotos habe ich auf die Homepage unter dem Baum gestellt
A hollow cylinder of a trunk is still strong, but if it becomes a forked hollow down into the roots or up into large branches, there are very weak points where it is liable to break up.
Arbre classé "remarquable" par la ville de Paris (environ 200 sujets sur une base de données de 200 000 arbres)
{{en}}
Tree classified as “remarkable” by the city of Paris (around 200 such trees among a database of 200,000 trees)
A very interesting article below.
https://royalsocietypublishing.org/doi/10.1098/rsos.230603
I personally believe that longevity of Giant Sequoia in its native habitat, will unlikely be reached in the UK? Partly due to evidence of observing decay in felled trees over 130 years in the heartwood, on some trees. Caused by Heterobasidion annosum and root death caused by Armillaria. But there maybe exceptions?
Apparently there are now more mature Sequoiadendon in the UK than in their native habitat. With a possible 500,000 UK specimens, the gene pool could provide a valuable resource for reintroduction to its native habitat in the distant future?
However with Sequoia sempervirens it appears no decaying fungi present in the UK are adapted to attacking it. So perhaps as it is even better suited to the UK climate and increasingly so with climate change. Subsequently it may outlive/outgrow Sequoiadendron?
* Abstract: the "half million" trees in UK is both species, all ages (including newly planted); figures for California are only S. giganteum, mature trees - probably only those older than any in UK counted?
* Abstract: "We show that UK-grown S. giganteum can sequester carbon at a rate of 85 kg yr⁻¹ varying with climate, management and age" - with no per-area cited, this is meaningless! Per square metre? Per hectare? Per square km? Per tree?
* Introduction: "Sequoiadendron giganteum groves in California also have the highest AGB of any ecosystem in the world [4]" . . . wrong, it's S. sempervirens, as confirmed by their own reference #4!
* Fig 3: "For comparison, data are shown for the same period from Sequoia National Park, CA, United States, a key S. giganteum site. Given the elevation (>3000 m), the latter site is far colder overall with significant winter snowfall" . . . errm., >2000 m! Checked: 'General Sherman' is at 2100 m. Gymnosperm Database gives 900-2700 m for the species' overall range.
And yes, I'd agree that S. sempervirens is much the better adapted for high carbon sequestration in UK. As well as less liable to disease, it is much better adapted to our climate, self-seeding, which S. giganteum doesn't.
The scans of the trees I had not seen before. Crucially though a very limited sample of Giant Sequoias were studied and perhaps not the best specimens/sites in the UK either!
Regarding natural regeneration of Giant Sequoia in the UK. Seed can be at least 50% viable but as you know I am sure, the absence of the Chickaree and beetle which severs the stem to the cone causing cones to dry and shed seed, it remains problematic for natural regen. However cone fall from high winds with seeds settling on bare mineral soil, perhaps could germinate, but have never seen it yet. Also most of the mature trees in the UK are not in full cone production yet either.
Whereas Coast Redwood is now germinating prolifically in the UK. I put this down to the lack of -10c frosts now as opposed to 40 years ago. Allowing trees to flower, also frosts not killing small seedlings.
Giant Sequoia is doomed in the UK if humans were to vanish!
And now it is 46.7 meters?
Haavar, don't worry i'll go and check with my dad if the trees are alive. We couldn't go there during the winter. But now to the summer we can.
it doesn't look hard to measure them, but i'll leave that to you since you do this a bit better than us.
What about the third tallest tree of the area, the one spruce that was 45.10 metres tall, is it also gone?
Uhmm was this tree 45.10 metres in 2011, or do you mean it was 45.10 metres in 2022?
Love Sarevok
The long straight trunk with such long hanging ribbons is also a feature of E. nitens, but I'm assuming you found flower-buds/fruit under this one (in 3s not 6s and 7s)?
Bij de bomen wordt steeds aangegeven hoe oud hij is. Dat is mooi. Maar bij een boom die gekapt is loopt de leeftijdtelling door. Kun je daar wellicht iets op verzinnen?
Zie bijvoorbeeld deze: https://www.monumentaltrees.com/nl/nld/zuidholland/rotterdam/4210_crooswijk/9764/
Groet
Wim
Daar had ik inderdaad niet aan gedacht.
Dat valt inderdaad op te lossen, ik bekijk het eens.
Groeten,
Tim
torsbygranen som var 47 meter höggs ner nära torsby, jag tror jag redan ser på kartan var torsbygranen en stod.
Ik zie in het tekstje dat WB wel iemand wil rondleiden in het landengebied in het Zuiderpark. Dat zou ik graag willen! Ik ben biologiedocent en probeer wat opdrachten te verzinnen in het Zuiderpark voor klas 1. Als ik zelf wat meer weet over de bomen, kan ik er interessantere vragen bij verzinnen.
Vriendelijke groet,
Jet
Ik ben die WB. Ik kom al jaren in het Zuiderpark en weet hoe handig het is als iemand wat basis-info verstrekt. Anders dwaal je er maar rond en weet je niet waar te beginnen. Je kunt contact met me leggen via wbrinkerinkatgmail.com. (Ik schrijf mijn exacte mailadres niet op om vervelende lieden te vermijden). Overigens lijkt het me verstamdig om te gaan kijken wanneer de blaadjes aan de bomen verschijnen, maar als het moet kan het ook zonder.
Nog een tip; in het verleden gaf de dienst Groenbeheer van de gemeente Den Haag een gratis boekje uit over het arboretum. Ik weet niet of dat nog steeds gebeurt, maar je kunt het proberen.
https://www.vriendenvandenhaag.nl/actualiteit/bomentuin-met-695-soorten-in-zuiderpark-blijft-bijzonder
Vriendelijke groet
Wim Brinkerink
Do you know of any Bunya Bunya pines in uk that are mature with there final shape?
Mistake me if im wrong, but did you write the collins tree guide because if you did, on one of the pages, it shows a bunya pine.
I have been searching for one for a few months now with no luck.
Where did you find a full grown one with a mature shape?
Currently, there are a few young tree showing good promise, including a replacement at Glendurgan which I should be revisiting this spring. One in a group of nine at Mount Stewart in Co. Down was 10.4m tall by 2018 (not my record). There is even a small crowded sapling surviving in the Chelsea Physic Garden in London.
The grid reference for the group of Araucaria bidwillii at Mount Stewart is J5547870049. You can visualise that by pasting it into the grid reference field at https://irish.gridreferencefinder.com/.
Parana Pine Araucaria angustifolia grows rather slowly with us, but there are a few which I'd say were semi-mature. There are some pictures of these at https://www.treesandshrubsonline.org/articles/araucaria/araucaria-angustifolia/.
I'm the (volunteer) Registrar for the Tree Register, www.treeregister.org, which aspires to be a comprehensive database at least for rare trees like these. The online interactive database has a paywall, meaning that details like these won't show on a ordinary Google search. (This is partly because many of the trees are in private gardens where owners don't want indiscriminate publicity, and membership subscriptions also cover the costs of maintaining the Register.) For anyone with a deep interest in trees, becoming a member is well worthwhile.
Owen
What is most interesting is that this is a second planting of Douglas here, after the previous 1905 stand was partially felled pre 1948.
The remaining 1905 trees were exposed on the plateau and stood out for miles. With a max height of 37m. The younger circa 1948 trees rapidly grew and overtook the older trees to 40-47m. Now the older trees live in their shadows! Now the older trees are growing in height again due to shelter and reducing transpirational stress.
The topsy turvy world of tree growth!
I measured the height of the Whitebeam I showed you. Recent thinning has given a better window for height measurement. Luckily this tree was left untouched.
Anyway 23.3m to the highest visible twig with laser on the tripod, so your vertical measurement was close.
Must be one of the tallest in UK? I hope to compare this with the one in Chesham Bois Wood soon.
I found a slightly higher twig on the nearby Wych Elm too @ 27.7m on the eastern stem.
So within 3km in this valley, one of the tallest Whitebeams, one of the tallest remaining Wych Elms in southern England and 2 Douglas Firs one we measured @46.3m and another recent tree nearby of 47.4m (Probably tallest tree in Home counties).
Will you be adding that new Douglas Fir to this site? In the Warburg Nature Reserve, again?
The planted 1948 Douglas Fir some 3km from the Whitebeam are in fact on top of the Chiltern plateau on acid soil at about 140m od. Quite a few are over 43m, with at least a dozen 45m, in a plantation, still adding height. I will upload soon.
Another stand in the South Oxfordshire Chilterns has trees to near 48m. Quite a few to 46-47m. Hope to return to do a more thorough investigation.
Now with more accurate laser measurement one could almost draw contour lines on the country indicating max conifer tree height potential from TROBI records? Certainly moving north and east into the Midlands most conifers of 40m would be almost absent. Whereas to the south and west and northwest increasing tree height where shelter allows to over 60m.
It is gratifying to find a champ!
Although I would be surprised its the world's tallest but who knows?
I will revisit to find its age sometime. The wood was planted at the same time as the Whitebeam so we can have a potential planting date too. Recent thinning work has been undertaken and it could have been quite easily felled!!
But as of no commercial value it stands. I seem to recall surrounding trees date to around mid to late 1930's on a ring count nearby.
Owen:-
Do you have any coordinates for the Whitebeam in Chesham Bois Wood, Bucks? I would like to find and remeasure with laser to compare. Thanks
Apologies for the poorly formatted list. Someone might be able to edit it to straighten the columns, I can't.
County Ht/m Year Genus name Species name Property name
Bedfordshire 44 2023 Sequoiadendron giganteum Woburn Abbey
Berkshire 42.5 2017 Sequoiadendron giganteum Wellingtonia Avenue, Finchamstead
Buckinghamshire 47.5 2014 Abies grandis Dropmore
Cheshire 39 2014 Sequoiadendron giganteum Cholmondeley Castle
Cornwall 46.7 2014 Picea sitchensis Tregrehan
Cumbria 57.8 2013 Abies grandis Skelghyll Woods
Derbyshire 50.6 2018 Picea sitchensis Ladybower Reservoir
Devon 54.5 2017 Sequoiadendron giganteum Knightshayes
Dorset 46 2022 Abies alba Minterne House
Durham 56 2016 Abies grandis Hamsterley Forest, Weardale
East Riding of Yorkshire 40.8 2016 Pseudotsuga menziesii Sledmere
East Sussex 47.3 2021 Sequoiadendron giganteum Beauport Park
Gloucestershire 59.5 2015 Pseudotsuga menziesii Dean: Sutton Bottom
Greater London 38 2023 Sequoiadendron giganteum Grim's Dyke Hotel, Harrow Weald
Hampshire 55.7 2021 Pseudotsuga menziesii New Forest: Holidays Hill Inclosure
Herefordshire 61 2023 Pseudotsuga menziesii Hergest Croft
Hertfordshire 40 2014 Pinus nigra subsp. laricio Brocket Hall
Kent 46.4 2019 Sequoiadendron giganteum Benenden School
Lancashire 40 2019 Picea sitchensis Slaidburn
Lincolnshire 44 2019 Pseudotsuga menziesii Woodhall Spa
Norfolk 47 2014 Abies grandis Weasenham Woods
North Yorkshire 55.2 2022 Sequoiadendron giganteum Sawley estate: Picking Gill
Northamptonshire 40 2014 Sequoiadendron giganteum Althorp Park
Northumberland 62 2022 Pseudotsuga menziesii Cragside, Rothbury
Nottinghamshire 40 2015 Sequoiadendron giganteum Perlethorpe
Oxfordshire 47.4 2024 Pseudotsuga menziesii Near Nettlebed
Rutland 38 1979 Sequoiadendron giganteum Exton Hall (Rutland)
Shropshire 55 2022 Pseudotsuga menziesii Sowdley Wood, Clun
Somerset 61.2 2017 Pseudotsuga menziesii Dunster Woodlands
South Yorkshire 41 2019 Picea sitchensis Ewden Village
Staffordshire 46 2003 Pseudotsuga menziesii Patshull Hall
Suffolk 40 2011 Sequoiadendron giganteum Nacton
Surrey 58.2 2015 Pseudotsuga menziesii Polecat Copse, Haslemere
Warwickshire 42.2 2013 Sequoiadendron giganteum Compton Verney
West Sussex 52 2016 Sequoiadendron giganteum Nymans
West Yorkshire 41 2020 Abies grandis Chevin Forest Park
Wiltshire 58 2016 Sequoiadendron giganteum Longleat: Center Parcs
Worcestershire 53 2021 Pseudotsuga menziesii Wyre Forest
But perhaps not yet as some are still growing, some faster than others. I never thought Douglas would approach 50m in South Oxfordshire on the Chiltern Plateau however!
One thing might prevent us from ever knowing what the max height can be attained, maybe the fact that how many of these tall trees are standing in isolation, exposed to wind and max transpirational stress etc as opposed standing in a large block for example in a plantation?
ik heb een boom aan Ruiterpad 2c ingevoerd maar zie hem niet in het overzicht
enig idee?
we willen op boomfeestdag 20/3 de 2 basisscholen aan het boommeten zetten via uw website, mag dat?
u zult wel een en ander moet deleten maar het is wel inspiritueel....
mocht dit tot kosten voor u leiden verneem ik dat graag, ik heb er minimaal een Renswowse boomtaart voor over, vers thuisbezorgd.....
andré v dijk 0616254996 24x7 domeinnaam omistokoud=bekend bij de schoolkinderen
This must surely rank as the record for growth for the species in the UK?
Conditions must be ideal for this species to reach this size in only circa 135 years.
Typically trees would need 200+ years to reach this size.
A clear indication that the largest trees are not necessarily the oldest!
Very difficult to say it has 3 pith centres. There is a strong union at 1.8m. More noticeable from the other side. This is where I suspect it forked when young sadly. From below this point I suspect its a single stem.
This tree has certainly grown faster than any in A. Mitchell's records. Examples include 3.43m in 104 years, a rate of growth half of this tree! Agree girth growth would be faster in this tree due to reaction wood below fork etc.
A classic example of how trees grow faster than most people realise and contradicts some claims that large trees are generally very old. Its the growing environment that counts!
But yes, there is some predictability in the laying down of multiple concentric layers of new wood.
Yes the growth in girth has been inflated due to buttress growth and reaction wood, but perhaps by only a metre in girth or so. If dividing higher up with a greater length of clear stem, then it still would be a potential champ for growth rate. There is something special about this valley for this species:-
1) High groundwater level beneath its root system. Its at the surface at present. No drought stress!
2) Deeply rootable well drained and aerated soil profile.
3) Slightly alkaline/neutral ph of high fertility probably high Nitrogen.
Plus no builders!!!!
So it does a disservice to the site when trees whose girths are only slightly exaggerated by a fork or by heavy branches are also put into that category. You could argue that a tree that forks at 3m has a larger girth as a result than one which runs for 10m before it forks - certainly the tree with the 10m bole will be the impressive one if the girth is the same, but it's not helpful to 'disqualify' the one with the shorter stem from any comparison.
Still a potential growth record for this species. Therefore I disagree that the girth has been inflated by 50%. Other trees in this valley with single trunks have also grown very fast for the species, with single trunks.
The measurement was made at the narrowest point at 1.2m. The physiology of the tree indicates (perhaps where due to some accident the tree lost its leader) that it forked at that height, when very young. There is no evidence that the tree forks at ground level. If it did I would classify it as multi stemmed like a coppiced Hazel. There is no occluded bark which would indicate multi stems growing from ground level. It is a sound strong union. I agree the pith centres are evident above 1.2m for the near vertical limbs. With the fusing strong union above 1.2m increasing the height of the vertical trunk length.
I am exhausted!!!
Op 12-1-2024 tussen 6:16 en 9;57 zijn er een stel vreemde gebruikers bijgekomen. ALs je op info bij hun account kijkt zie je dat het spammers zijn. Geen serieus volk.
From the 'Recent changes' log:
14:13 pestcontrol319 has registered as a new user.
13:31 pestcontrol217 has registered as a new user.
13:03 pestcontrol634 has registered as a new user.
12:48 pestcontrol542 has registered as a new user.
12:31 pestcontrol839 has registered as a new user.
12:13 pestcontrol933 has registered as a new user.
11:55 pestcontrol208 has registered as a new user.
As long as these are not posting spam messages or start editing, this is not very harmful.
¹ https://bctreehunter.wordpress.com/2021/07/21/a-visit-to-the-highwayman/
I measured the height of the Whitebeam I showed you. Recent thinning has given a better window for height measurement. Luckily this tree was left untouched.
Anyway 23.3m to the highest visible twig with laser on the tripod, so your vertical measurement was close.
Must be one of the tallest in UK? I hope to compare this with the one in Chesham Bois Wood soon.
I found a slightly higher twig on the nearby Wych Elm too @ 27.7m on the eastern stem.
So within 3km in this valley, one of the tallest Whitebeams, one of the tallest remaining Wych Elms in southern England and 2 Douglas Firs one we measured @46.3m and another recent tree nearby of 47.4m (Probably tallest tree in Home counties).
From my observation and evidence the red line shows where the tree forked when young. From below this line a single stem for 1.2m. I reiterate that this tree is not multi stemmed from the base. See photo.
I feel you are being a little pedantic on this. There no way to tell for sure without the tree being felled.
You mention yourself (in the caption for photo 161439) that this is likely the fastest-growing Aesculus in the UK, because of its 3 massive upright limbs and associated reaction wood: but this is exactly why MT has the multi-stem disclaimer, that the tree's girth is larger than you'd expect for a single-trunk tree. You have to accept the results of your own conclusions!
I appreciate your contributions on multistemmed. I can learn from it. Without good discussion no progress. But if I confirm to the way you analyze and decide if there is multistem or single, a certain tree [22964] should be classified as multistemmed. But the first person who started to live in this house planted the tree herself. It is by 100% certainty just one tree. S all respect, but being decisive on multi- or single stemmed is not often very easy, but you are aware of it.
https://www.monumentaltrees.com/nl/nld/zuidholland/wassenaar/11764_nassaulaan3en5_prive/
Kind regards
Wim
Thanks for the note! There's a big difference between multi-stem, and multi-tree! A single tree can still very easily become multi-trunk, if it has side branches, or multiple lead stems, which are not pruned. I have no problem accepting that Caucasian Wingnut (Pterocarya fraxinifolia) '22964' is a single tree; but when it was planted, some low side shoots (about a metre or a little more above the soil level) were allowed to continue growth until they became large branches, which add greatly to the girth at 1.3-1.5 m above ground. That is one very common way in which a single tree can become multi-stemmed. Hope this helps! - Michael (Conifers)
Scrivere di Quercus pubescens in Sicilia sarebbe come scrivere semplicemente quercia.
Questo link riporta al più recente studioso del genere Quercus in Sicilia,
già collaboratore con Rosario Schicchi e Francesco M. Raimondo entrambi direttori presso l'orto botanico di Palermo.
https://cambriasalvatore.wixsite.com/flora-della-sicilia/quercus-amplifolia-guss
PS. In Sicilia evitiamo di chiamare le Querce "roverella" ovvero Quercus pubescens in quanto secondo il Pignatti,
questa specie non è presente nella stessa forma che nel resto dell'Italia.
Non abbiate fretta nel prendere decisioni in merito.Bye
I am trying to get started with "Monumental trees.com". Unfortunately, when trying to add a new tree, I keep getting this error-note: Warning: Undefined array key "subgroup" in /customers/0/1/c/monumentaltrees.com/httpd.www/login/process.php on line 792 Fatal error: Uncaught TypeError: mysqli_num_rows(): Argument #1 ($result) must be of type mysqli_result, bool given in /customers/0/1/c/monumentaltrees.com/httpd.www/login/process.php:854 Stack trace: #0 /customers/0/1/c/monumentaltrees.com/httpd.www/login/process.php(854): mysqli_num_rows(false) #1 /customers/0/1/c/monumentaltrees.com/httpd.www/login/process.php(145): Process->procAddTree() #2 /customers/0/1/c/monumentaltrees.com/httpd.www/login/process.php(2661): Process->runConstructor() #3 {main} thrown in /customers/0/1/c/monumentaltrees.com/httpd.www/login/process.php on line 854
The tree is a Aesculus hippocastanum, with white blossoms, I don't know of any "subgroup". Besides this, I filled in all the lines in the form,even the one about when the tree was planted (which can't be said, exactly, just an estimate from old photos), and don't know what happens here. Can anybody please let me know what to do? Thanks a lot!
What do you think?
Groet
Wim
Thanks for registering this tree. I have changed it a bit. You tried to shield the location to protect the owner. I saw on the internet that the tree is part of a series of films on intenet. No one hesitates to show the tree and the location. So I changed things and changed location. I took care of respect to your input. It's still your registered tree (that doesn't facilitate claims by the way) and I have added some info.
KInd regards
WIm
Het was een prachtboom in één van de mooiste gebieden van Rotterdam.
Saludos.
If true, I had input the information a Black Cherry (Prunus Serotina) #58792 tree into the list back in December of 2022. It is noted to be multi-stemmed per some foresters that use different criteria. Can the entry for this tree be changed to be single-stemmed in the Monumental Trees list?
Thank you for your consideration.
I am still planning to measure the west stem of this tree. It is somewhere near 15' (over 4 meters) in girth. But it will need to be measured about 4 meters from the ground in order to get a clean measurement for girth. I expect that might still set this up for being 4th or 5th on your list.
My estimates would put this tree around 300 years old.
Kind regards.
https://science.mnhn.fr/institution/mnhn/collection/p/item/p06860974?listIndex=4&listCount=9
Coming to Quercus orocantabrica, this is the description: "When comparing with typical Q. robur, the diagnostic characters are related with leaf length, shape, and texture. Typically, Q. orocantabrica has a thicker and leathery blade, with oblong to oblong-transovate shape. Moreover, the leaves are wider and glossy with unequal lobes, more than 6(8) secondary nerves and larger cups, with brownish and acute not-fused scales. Q. orocantabrica often presents both longer petiole (up to 15 mm) and peduncle (up to 15 cm) in comparison with Q. robur. These characters are collectively distributed across all syntypes, that are cited by the authors (Schwarz, 1937; Rivas-Martínez et al. 2002) in the protologues of both Q. robur subsp. broteroana and Q. orocantabrica."
It's going to be a challenge to differentiate this new species, as as far as I know Quercus orocantabrica grows together with Quercus robur in all the Cantabrian Mountain Range. It's going to be a real challenge, as with the phenomenon of the advance of the atlantic forest we are seeing all this species returning after centuries to their old habitats massively expanding their thought habitats from 50 years ago.
Classical image of todays Cantabrian Mountains, young trees growing of a thick Cistus shrubbrery. This were rye fields 50 years ago, today a woodland of Quercus pyrenaica, Quercus rotundifolia, Arbutus unedo, Castanea sativa and this lonely exemplar of Quercus robur/Quercus orocantabrica? is growing.
Honestly I can't differentiate between Quercus robur and Quercus orocantabrica, maybe because I learned to identify Q. orocantabrica with Q. robur?
Another potential exemplar of Quercus orocantabrica growing between two meadows, also feeding cows with its leaves.
They are wide, hard, glossy and with unequal lobes.
Full article here:
https://revistas.ucm.es/index.php/MBOT/article/view/79286/4564456561777
What do you think?
*CORRECTION* All Quercus robur in Spain and Portugal Will be identified as Quercus orocantabrica.
Yo pienso que en un género tan fluido como Quercus es muy arriesgado hacer nuevas distinciones claras entre especies , por la gran variabilidad de las mismas y las hibridaciones.
No se por qué se arrogan autoridad suficiente para nominar nuevas especies en base a unas diferencias morfológicas sutiles y discutibles, máxime cuando parece que ni han hecho estudios genéticos, los cuales serían indispensables para comprobar si realmente existe una disparidad lo suficientemente grande entre los ejemplares.
Es gracioso que unos autores portugueses y españoles publicando en una revista española escriban el artículo en inglés.
Un saludo.
En cuanto a que el inglés es el idioma internacional científico no veo por qué. Dónde está escrito eso ? Hay muchos trabajos publicados en español o en otros idiomas.
Un saludo.
We have made a new website on European virgin forests:
https://virginforests.eu/
The contributors include two further members of the MT community: Alberto and Dominic ("InSearchOfGiants").
Check the site and feel free to give us feedback, corrections and ideas for improvement!
Kouta
In a first visit I scrolled through some pages. It's very promising. And escpecially that on your first visit one sees the most beautiful pictures about forests. Thank you. .
I'll be visiting it more often
Wim
The single most important improvement I would suggest would be following the IUCN or BSBI exactly for English vernacular names of species, thus Scots Pine, Macedonian Pine, Silver Birch, etc., not lowercase, which looks unprofessional in modern botanical writing.
The main list of virgin forests would be better indexed alphabetically by country (like they are in the subsection 'Other virgin forests'), rather than alphabetically by site. Currently, it is difficult to find e.g. all sites in Bulgaria.
Why are right-click and text highlight / copy disabled? Seems a bit pointless, mildly annoying (like with 'Other virgin forests' above, I had to type that out, rather than copy-paste as one normally would), without actually protecting the images from download.
Conifers,
Thank you for your comments. At the beginning we considered all the issues you mentioned.
Lower vs. uppercase. Both are used in English literature and websites. Lowercase is used, for example, by Wikipedia, Gymnosperm Database, Euforgen and Oaks of the World. Don Welsh said we should use lowercase and that was decisive for me. Could you give me a link to the suggestions of IUCN and BSBI? Has there been a change in recent years from upper to lowercase? Perhaps lowercase is used more in North America and uppercase in the UK? If you can convince me that lowercase is routinely used in the British literature today, I am could change the names, though it will be a big task to do.
The order of the forest in the list. I asked opinions of all the contributors and the current system won. A reasoning could be 1. that if one wants to quickly check a forest he knows, e.g. Bialowieza, it is easy to find, or 2. that the site is not mentioned to be a complete listing of all the virgin forest. If there would be a list item [Bulgaria: Dzendema, Parangalitsa, Rilski Manastir, Steneto], one could more easily think, these are the only virgin forests in Bulgaria.
Disabled right-clicking. You guessed, it is an easy, though clumsy, way to protect photos from easy download. Of course, any photo can be copied by Print Screen, it only makes copying more difficult and probably protects downloading the full size photos if the monitor is smaller. I put this in my todos list and we consider another way to prevent downloading.
Thanks! Yes, lowercase is used more in USA than UK; here, uppercase first letters is fairly routine. But also, lowercase tends to be used more by journalists and newspaper writers, and uppercase more by scientists (botanists, zoologists, etc.). Wikipedia used to use uppercase, until a bunch of primarily American journalists forced a change, which caused massive acrimony and resulted in a lot of expert editors leaving wikipedia to the trolls. The use of capitals for English species names has a very long history, for example Philip Miller's 1768 Gardeners Dictionary, or, even further back, William Turner's 1551 A New Herball - the very first botanical textbook in the English language - used capitalised English names.
Here are a couple of sample pages, from IUCN and BSBI, respectively. All, or virtually all, of the increasingly popular citizen science recording websites also use capitals, such as iNaturalist and Bubo Listing. So too does the International Dendrology Society's Trees and Shrubs Online.
Hope this helps!
Thank you so much!
Alberto.
What is really missing in my opinion is an overview map of all virgin forests. I understand that you might not want to include all exact locations, for example if a forest is not open to the public. But for these i think a good solution is to place the marker somewhere else, for example at a nearby town, and add a disclaimer like "location disguised" to the pop-up, to avoid confusion.
im Forum des Baumregisters von Baumkunde.de hat HerrMoritz von der Linde berichtet.
Er verweist auf deine Kommentare zur Linde im Park Cösitz:
"oberes Ende der ehemaligen Treppe auf die vormalige Tanzlinde (3-10-2020)"
Ich stelle gerade eine Liste mit allen Tanzlinden und geleiteten Linden in Deutschland zusammen
und bin sehr an Informationen über diese bislang unbekannte ehem. geleitete Linde interssiert.
Auch hier können wir uns austauschen, Link für eine Private Nachricht an mich: https://www.baumkunde.de/forum/ucp.php?i=pm&mode=compose&u=7156
Viele Grüße
Klaus Heinemann
Habe keinen Account in dem anderen Forum. Eigentlich sind alle Infos, die ich vor Ort erlangt habe, in meinen Fotos hier.
Freundliche Grüße!
André Ay
danke für die schnelle Reaktion!
Mich interessiert die Quelle der Info -
steht das im Park auf einer Tafel oder Beschriftung, oder gibt es etwas in Papirform?
Grüße, Klaus
Warning: mysqli_connect(): (HY000/1203): User monumentaltrees already has more than 'max_user_connections' active connections in /customers/0/1/c/monumentaltrees.com/httpd.www/login/database.php on line 78 Fatal error: Uncaught ArgumentCountError: mysqli_error() expects exactly 1 argument, 0 given in /customers/0/1/c/monumentaltrees.com/httpd.www/login/database.php:78 Stack trace: #0 /customers/0/1/c/monumentaltrees.com/httpd.www/login/database.php(78): mysqli_error() #1 /customers/0/1/c/monumentaltrees.com/httpd.www/login/database.php(795): MySQLDB->makeConnection() #2 /customers/0/1/c/monumentaltrees.com/httpd.www/login/session.php(9): include_once('/customers/0/1/...') #3 /customers/0/1/c/monumentaltrees.com/httpd.www/site/index.php(11): include('/customers/0/1/...') #4 {main} thrown in /customers/0/1/c/monumentaltrees.com/httpd.www/login/database.php on line 78
Has anyone noticed any odd rapid accumulation of views in their photos? It has happened quite a bit recently to me, and in all of these cases, no votes or comments on these trees. Other trees have taken several years to approach these higher number of views. Just wondering if there is a potential glitch.
Thx !
Kelly
I've seen that with some of my photos too. It's probably a bot searching the internet.
Regards, Alfred
Thanks Tim and keep up the good working please.
Wim
Gerrit.
Jurgen, wil jij eens contact met mij opnemen over andere bomen rond Leusden. Groet,
Gerrit Visscher, lindera2015@outlook.com
I suspect these are the tallest Coast Redwoods in Oxfordshire and Buckinghamshire/Chiltern Hills?
Regards
Stephen
Recent heb ik een dwars doorsnede met korrel 220 geschuurd. Ik heb hierbij 153 jaarringen geteld.
ik ben heel benieuwd waar je de gegevens over de plaats en de nabij staande boerderij hebt gevonden. Kun je mij daar meer over vertellen? Bij het Streekarchivariaat kwam ik geen informatie tegen.
Hartelijke groet,
Willem
Ik heb de kaart toegevoegd waarop de Kousekiek met naam wordt weergegeven. Ik kreeg een kopie van die kaart bij boerderij Busselserf in het buurtschap Leuvenum. Ik heb zelf in het Streekarchivariaat en verder op internet ook geen verdere informatie kunnen vinden.
Vriendelijke groet, Alfred
Me llamo Jose Roces, y soy profesor (ayudante) en ciencias forestales en la Universidad de Oviedo (España). Mi línea principal de trabajo se basa en estudiar los principales beneficios que los bosques y los paisajes proporcionan a la sociedad.
Estamos interesados en hacer un trabajo científico, explorando los patrones geográficos de los árboles monumentales en España/Península Ibérica, así como estudiando los principales factores que afectan a que así se consideren (e.g. la especie, el tamaño del individuo, etc.).
Para ello, estaría genial disponer de la base de datos de los árboles (Españoles & Portugueses) incluidos en esta pagina web, con sus datos asociados (tamaño, especie, nombre, etc.) incluyendo las coordenadas X e Y donde se encuentran. ¿sería posible?
Por supuesto, el uso no sería comercial, y nos comprometemos a no distribuirlo, y citar de forma adecuada la fuente de datos.
No dude en contactarme en rocesjose@uniovi.es
Gracias por su tiempo y trabajo
+++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++
Hello, good afternoon
My name is Jose Roces, and I am a professor (assistant) in forest sciences at the University of Oviedo (Spain). My main line of research is based on studying the main benefits that forests and landscapes provide to society.
We are interested in doing a scientific work (a paper), exploring the geographical patterns of monumental trees in Spain/Iberian Peninsula, as well as studying the main factors that affect them to be considered as such (e.g. species, size of the individual, etc.).
For this purpose, it would be great to have the database of the trees (Spanish & Portuguese) included in this website, with their associated data (size, species, name, etc.) including the X and Y coordinates where they are located. Would it be possible?
Of course, the use would be non-commercial, and we undertake not to distribute it, and to properly cite the source of the data.
Do not hesitate to contact me at rocesjose@uniovi.es
Thank you for your time and work
De bomen op deze site zijn soms monumentaal, soms ook niet. Het is heel vaak een persoonlijke mening van iemand. Het is niet anders. Het feit dat een boom hier geregistreerd is geeft geen garantie op monumentaliteit of iets anders. Helaas zijn monumentale bomen in Nederland niet of nauwelijks beschermd. Wel wordt er door veel personen of organisaties gehandeld als er gevaar is voor "monumentale " bomen. Dat hangt echter sterk van de plaatselijke omstandigheden af. Met name de Bomenstichting wil daar nog wel eens een rol in spelen. Maar dan moet er in de regio wel iemand zijn die dat op zich neemt. Zo niet is het kansloos. Ik zal eens kijken hoe de situatie bij de Bomenstichting in Eindhoven is. En anders pikt iemand uit de omgeving dit wellicht op.
I see regularly a comment that someone changed a description. It is often difficult to see what has been changed. Furthermore, sometimes I have doubts about the legitimacy of the change. I see that someone who is seldomly present, changes a description.
What's your opinion?
Wim
Then I can have a look to see what the change was.
2023-12-06
1:22 Conifers has changed the description of a Sessile Oak in Windsor Great Park, Windsor, United Kingdom.
All I did was correct a typo ('succombed' → 'succumbed') and added a missing fullstop. But I could have changed a whole lot more substantially altering the entire text, and the summary in the Recent changes would be no different. It isn't possible (except presumably for Tim / Admin.) to see what changes have been made.
I recently changed this site.
https://www.monumentaltrees.com/nl/nld/zuidholland/rotterdam/118_arboretumtrompenburg/
I removed something and I added something. No one can see what's happened. And I think it is interesting to know what someone changes.
yes, I understand the request.
I have now added a link "see changes" to the recent changes list when a tree description gets changed.
Examples from the "recent changes" list:
- 1:22 Conifers has changed the description of a Sessile Oak in Windsor Great Park, Windsor, United Kingdom (see changes).
- 21:32 Stephen Verge has changed the description of a Common Douglas-fir on the East facing slope of the valley, Puckpits Inclosure, Acres Down, Near Minstead, United Kingdom (see changes).
When clicking on that link, you will be brought to a page that shows the differences between the last and the second last version of the description.
This could be made more fancy by e.g. being able to choose exactly which versions to compare etc., but I hope this is already an improvement.
Kind regards,
Tim
Er is een nieuw boek verschenen van de hand van Gert fortgens, de voormalige hortuaris van Trompenburg. Het boek lijkt alleen te koop in de winkel van Trompenburg. Ik denk dat niet iedereen in de gelegenheid is om daar even langs te gaan en Trompenburg verstuurt de boeken niet. Ik heb Gert gevraagd hoe ik aan het boek kan komen. Nou: bestellen bij LM publishers. Je betaalt slechts 2,50 verzendkosten en het boek kost 29,95.
Zie hier de link. (en Tim dit is geen commerciële boodschap) De liefhebber wordt graag geïnformeerd over Trompenburg.
https://lmpublishers.nl/product/trompenburg-tuinen-arboretum-rotterdam/
Wim Brinkerink
Not sure if you know this fact, but Puck Pitts, Boulderwood and Rhinefield Drive were planted by the Deputy Surveyor Lawrence Henry Cumberbatch.
This will include the probable Corsican Pines, Giant Sequoia, Coast Redwoods Champion UK Norway Spruces and European Silver Firs etc at the above localities.
(A Modern Sylva or a Discourse of Forest Trees by H.L. Edlin)
Royal Forestry Society publication October 1965.
Just shows that the ages claimed for large oaks such as these are grossly over exaggerated! Most unpollarded oaks fail after some 280-350 years.
The main English page link https://www.monumentaltrees.com/en/ is broken; it gives this error message:
Warning: mysqli_connect(): (HY000/1203): User monumentaltrees already has more than 'max_user_connections' active connections in /customers/0/1/c/monumentaltrees.com/httpd.www/login/database.php on line 78 Fatal error: Uncaught ArgumentCountError: mysqli_error() expects exactly 1 argument, 0 given in /customers/0/1/c/monumentaltrees.com/httpd.www/login/database.php:78 Stack trace: #0 /customers/0/1/c/monumentaltrees.com/httpd.www/login/database.php(78): mysqli_error() #1 /customers/0/1/c/monumentaltrees.com/httpd.www/login/database.php(795): MySQLDB->makeConnection() #2 /customers/0/1/c/monumentaltrees.com/httpd.www/login/session.php(9): include_once('/customers/0/1/...') #3 /customers/0/1/c/monumentaltrees.com/httpd.www/site/index.php(11): include('/customers/0/1/...') #4 {main} thrown in /customers/0/1/c/monumentaltrees.com/httpd.www/login/database.php on line 78
The only way I can enter the website is to go to one of the other languages (e.g. replace /en/ with /nl/ ), and then click on 'View in English'; other pages like https://www.monumentaltrees.com/en/discussion/ are OK, it is just the main link.
Thanks!
I had the same problem. Tried another browser (Fireworks) and it worked. In the next step I started with chrome again and pressed F5. That was the solution. No problems anymore.
Wim
It is likely some of those pages (in Conifer's case the English main page, could just as well have been another one) made it into your browser's cache. Simply hitting F5 in your browser after that time would have solved it (no need to go to another browser) or simply waiting until it expired in the browser's cache, would have helped too.
Kind regards,
Tim
Na de storing van gisteren is er toch nog een foutje blijven hangen. Op de boompagina's wordt de boomhoogte niet altijd goed weergegeven. Bij enkele metingen is er geen probleem maar als een boom meerdere keren is opgemeten wordt de tabel met hoogtemetingen niet weergegeven. Zou je daar naar kunnen kijken?
Groet, Alfred
Groeten,
Tim
Groet, Alfred
on request it is now also possible to register trees in Moldova.
Kind regards,
Tim
¿Estas seguro de que en esta ubicación esta el "Castiñeiro do Maestro? En este lugar concretamente no hay ningun arbol monumental. El famoso castaño es el que he registrado yo después, sin saber que estaba aqui este otro registrado por tí y que está a unos 250 metros de distancia.
Creo que seria bueno para el sitio web no registrar árboles que no visitemos o midamos nosotros mismos, al no ser que estemos muy seguros de su ubicacion o que hayan muerto y solamente quede constancia de él en archivos o fotos.
Un saludo.
Disculpa, no he visto tu mensaje hasta ahora.
La verdad es que yo en esta ubicación no vi ningun árbol muy grande aunque hay buenos castaños por todo el pueblo y toda esa zona. Por la parte más alta del pueblo hay varios castaños de 5 o 6 metros de circunferencia. Fue un paisano el que me indico cual es el Castiñeiro do Maestro y fue él quien me dijo que perdió la rama mas grande y alta hace no muchos años, de hay la discordancia en altura de la medicion que anotaste tu y la mia.
Lo que he hecho, si no es inconveniente por tu parte, ha sido editar el nombre dejandolo vacio y poniendoselo al que registre yo.
De haber visto que estaba registrado este árbol antes de registrar el mio, hubiese modificado la localizacion simplemente.
Muchas gracias y un saludo.
Big tree hug
the technical part behind this is just a one-man project I started when I was a student.
Now, many years later, I'm still extending the functionality and maintaining the site (for which the magnificent content gets added by many) every time I have a little time. I like the idea of collaboration but I'm afraid I cannot make any commitments due to time lacking on my side. I would like to keep it fun for myself (doing something because there is time) and not make if feel like a job or obligation (doing something/having meetings/... because I committed to something I cannot support).
Hope for your understanding.
Kind regards,
Tim
a long standing request was taken care of: it is now possible to not only "edit" your own measurements (which is: change the value, measurement method, ...) it is not also possible to remove your own measurements. Note that these measurements are never really deleted, they are simply marked as deleted and can be recovered on request.
It is now also possible to add multiple measurements in the same year. That might cause some troubles with the growth rate calculations, have not tested that thoroughly. Let me know if something goes wrong.
Certain users can now also delete measurements of others - obviously, please only use this in case of obvious errors (typo, incorrect tree measured, ...), in any other doubtful situations it would be polite to initiate a discussion first.
Kind regards,
Tim
today a long standing known bug was solved: if a tree got marked as timbered, cut down, collapsed, ... the girth measurement for the entire location in the lists was not necessarily updated. This is now the case.
Kind regards,
Tim
Die sog. "Sisi-Platane" im Wiener Volksgarten soll geschlägert, abgeholzt werden.
Die Absperrgitter rund um den riesigen Baum sind bereits aufgestellt.
Die Sisi-Platane ist ein eingetragenes Naturdenkmal (ID 376).
Die Liste der Naturdenkmale nennt die "Morgenländische Platane (lat. Platanus Platanus) als "für den Volksgarten parkbildbestimmend".
Der Stammumfang wird derzeit mit über 6 Metern angegeben.
Damit ist dieser Baum einer der großartigsten und historisch bedeutendsten der Stadt Wien.
Angeblich ist der Baum "tot".
Doch seine gewaltige Krone ist voll belaubt und es gibt äußerlich kein Anzeichen für Krankheiten oder Fäulnis.
Wir sollten uns wehren.
UH
links:
https://de.wikipedia.org/wiki/Liste_der_Naturdenkm%C3%A4ler_in_Wien/Innere_Stadt#/media/Datei:Naturdenkmal_376_2011-09-29_P9290033_Wien01_Volksgarten_Platane.JPG
https://www.monumentaltrees.com/de/aut/wien/innerestadt/5591_volksgarten/11084/
https://www.baumkunde.de/forum/viewtopic.php?t=27535
Die sog. "Sisi-Platane" im Wiener Volksgarten soll geschlägert, abgeholzt werden.
Die Absperrgitter rund um den riesigen Baum sind bereits aufgestellt.
Die Sisi-Platane ist ein eingetragenes Naturdenkmal (ID 376).
Die Liste der Naturdenkmale nennt die "Morgenländische Platane (lat. Platanus Platanus) als "für den Volksgarten parkbildbestimmend".
Der Stammumfang wird derzeit mit über 6 Metern angegeben.
Damit ist dieser Baum einer der großartigsten und historisch bedeutendsten der Stadt Wien.
Angeblich ist der Baum "tot".
Doch seine gewaltige Krone ist voll belaubt und es gibt äußerlich kein Anzeichen für Krankheiten oder Fäulnis.
Wir sollten uns wehren.
UH
links:
https://de.wikipedia.org/wiki/Liste_der_Naturdenkm%C3%A4ler_in_Wien/Innere_Stadt#/media/Datei:Naturdenkmal_376_2011-09-29_P9290033_Wien01_Volksgarten_Platane.JPG
https://www.monumentaltrees.com/de/aut/wien/innerestadt/5591_volksgarten/11084/
https://www.baumkunde.de/forum/viewtopic.php?t=27535
Désolé de vous déranger, mais j'aimerais vous acheter du quercus trojana et des glands libanais si possible. S'il vous plaît, aidez-moi, donnez-moi un prix et je paierai via PayPal. Salutations: Zoltán
Désolé de vous déranger, mais j'aimerais vous acheter du quercus trojana et des glands libanais si possible. S'il vous plaît, aidez-moi, donnez-moi un prix et je paierai via PayPal. Salutations: Zoltán
■ Zuckerkiefer
Die grössten Zapfen aller Nadelhölzer besitzt die im westlichen Nordamerika heimische Zuckerkiefer. Sie können eine Länge von bis zu 60 cm erreichen und sind im geöffneten Zustand bis zu 25 cm breit. Die Zuckerkiefer ist auch die höchste aller Kieferarten (bis über 80 m).
The tallest pine is now Pinus ponderosa subsp. benthamiana, to 83 m.
https://www.monumentaltrees.com/de/aut/niederosterreich/wienumgebung/4788_donau/13131/
da steht gar nix kein baum nix
nur ein aufgeschütteter Erdhaufen
https://www.monumentaltrees.com/de/aut/niederosterreich/wienumgebung/4788_donau/11963/
der ist gar nicht da
war gestern dort, nicht vorhanden gar nix
Este árbol, se encuentra en la Comuna de Curacautín, y no en la de Victoria como dice la información.
Está ubicado afuera del Parque Nacional Tolhuaca, en el recinto propiedad de las Termas de Tolhuaca, hoy conocidas como Termas de Malleco
atentamente
leonardo araya
Quelqu'un peut-il dire si les appareils de mesure sont équivalents au Nikon Forestry Pro ?
So, can we register this tree ?
Is er een leeftijd geweten van de pinus nigra in het park Vordenstein te Schoten ?
beste groeten,
Koenraad
Quelqu'un peut-il dire si les appareils de mesure sont équivalents au Nikon Forestry Pro ?
Danie du Plessis dplesdf@unisa.ac.za
I think this one didn't work. couldn't embed it. I could make a QR-code, but that's not enough. This one is copying a link to the pic. I do not want the link but the picture shown, as I have seen others do.
I allways take in account copyright matters. Thanks for your tip.
gefeliciteerd met deze bijzondere vondst. Ik ken dat eikenlaantje als ik vanaf een tankstation naar het zuiden van NL-limburg rijd. Ik ga er zeker eens op letten.
Thank you for joining. We can appreciate your contributions. But please complie to the ways we do our things in this community? Please?? And contribute in the normal way? And you perfectly know what is normal and what is not. Or? Any doubts about what's normal?
In diesem Gebiet dürfte künftig ein neues Quartier entstehen. Das ist gut so. Trotzdem sollte meiner Meinung nach diese Pracht-Hagebuche erhalten und integrierender Teil des Grünraums dieses Quartiers werden. Sie wäre nicht nur schön, sondern könnte auch einen wertvollen Beitrag an die künftige Siedlungsqualität leisten.
Schöne Bäume sollten nicht nur in Pärken, Wäldern oder im Offenland stehen, aber auch in einfachen Quartieren und in Agglomerationen. Was meint ihr dazu?
■ Die größten Früchte wachsen auf dem indischen Jackbaum.
Eine einzige Frucht wiegt rund 25 kg. Sie ist gelb, oval und stachelig und kann roh oder gekocht gegessen werden.
Gruss
Werner5 (Werner)
■ Die älteste Baumwurzel hat der 'Huon Pine", eine Kiefer.
Sie befindet sich in Tasmanien. Zahlreiche Stämme lassen auf einen Kiefernwald schliessen, aber es ist nachgewiesen, dass sie alle aus ein und demselben Wurzelgeflecht entspringen und ein einheitliches Genom besitzen.
10.500 Jahre alt ist das Wurzelgeflecht der sogenannten "Huon Pine" in Tasmanien - das haben Wissenschaftler herausgefunden. Aus den uralten Wurzeln sprießen immer wieder neue, genetisch identische Kiefern. Die Pflanze klont sich also immer wieder selbst. Die älteste Kiefer darunter ist etwa 2000 Jahre alt. Diesen Trick nutzen vor allem viele, sehr alte Pflanzen. Im Jahr 2009 haben kalifornische Wissenschaftler einen Busch gefunden, der sich seit 13.000 Jahren selbst klont. Er stammt also noch aus der letzten Eiszeit. Mittlerweile hat sich der Jurupa-Eiche getaufte Busch an die sengende Hitze Kaliforniens gewöhnt und sich demtentsprechend angepasst. Genug Zeit dazu hatte er ja.
Gruss
Werner5 (Werner)
■ Die älteste Baumwurzel hat der 'Huon Pine", eine Kiefer.
Sie befindet sich in Tasmanien. Zahlreiche Stämme lassen auf einen Kiefernwald schliessen, aber es ist nachgewiesen, dass sie alle aus ein und demselben Wurzelgeflecht entspringen und ein einheitliches Genom besitzen.
10.500 Jahre alt ist das Wurzelgeflecht der sogenannten "Huon Pine" in Tasmanien - das haben Wissenschaftler herausgefunden. Aus den uralten Wurzeln sprießen immer wieder neue, genetisch identische Kiefern. Die Pflanze klont sich also immer wieder selbst. Die älteste Kiefer darunter ist etwa 2000 Jahre alt. Diesen Trick nutzen vor allem viele, sehr alte Pflanzen. Im Jahr 2009 haben kalifornische Wissenschaftler einen Busch gefunden, der sich seit 13.000 Jahren selbst klont. Er stammt also noch aus der letzten Eiszeit. Mittlerweile hat sich der Jurupa-Eiche getaufte Busch an die sengende Hitze Kaliforniens gewöhnt und sich demtentsprechend angepasst. Genug Zeit dazu hatte er ja.
Sie befindet sich in Tasmanien. Zahlreiche Stämme lassen auf einen Kiefernwald schliessen, aber es ist nachgewiesen, dass sie alle aus ein und demselben Wurzelgeflecht entspringen und ein einheitliches Genom besitzen.
10.500 Jahre alt ist das Wurzelgeflecht der sogenannten "Huon Pine" in Tasmanien - das haben Wissenschaftler herausgefunden. Aus den uralten Wurzeln sprießen immer wieder neue, genetisch identische Kiefern. Die Pflanze klont sich also immer wieder selbst. Die älteste Kiefer darunter ist etwa 2000 Jahre alt. Diesen Trick nutzen vor allem viele, sehr alte Pflanzen. Im Jahr 2009 haben kalifornische Wissenschaftler einen Busch gefunden, der sich seit 13.000 Jahren selbst klont. Er stammt also noch aus der letzten Eiszeit. Mittlerweile hat sich der Jurupa-Eiche getaufte Busch an die sengende Hitze Kaliforniens gewöhnt und sich demtentsprechend angepasst. Genug Zeit dazu hatte er ja.
Gruss Werner5 (Werner)
bis 4700 Metern.
Gruss Werner5 (Werner)
■ Die schuppenrindige Tanne (Abies squamata) wächst auf 4600 m Seehöhe am Ost-Himalaya in Sichuan und ist damit der Baum, der der dünnsten Luft ausgesetzt ist.
Gruss Werner5 (Werner)
■ Die schuppenrindige Tanne (Abies squamata) wächst auf 4600 m Seehöhe am Ost-Himalaya in Sichuan und ist damit der Baum, der der dünnsten Luft ausgesetzt ist.
Gruss Werner5 (Werner)
Eine Frage die man wohl derzeit nicht eindeutig beantworten kann. Es ist eine recht exakte Schätzung möglich.
Mit sehr hoher Wahrscheinlichkeit sind dies Nadelbäume in der Taiga. Da dort auf Grund des harten Klimas eine geringe Artenvielfalt herrscht, überwiegen hier die Nadelbäume. Auch die Ausbeutung durch den Menschen wird durch das rauhe Klima doch sehr erschwert als in anderen Regionen unserer Erde.
Gemäß Expertern gelten die drei dort vorkommenden Baumarten als die häufigsten unserer Welt:
■ Kanadische oder Schimmelfichte (Picea glauca)
■ Dahurische Lärche (Larix gmelinii)
■ Sibirische Lärche (Larix sibirica)
Eine Statistik gibt es darüber aber nicht. Die drei Baumarten werden sozusagen von Experten als die Favoriten angesehen.
■ Die vorherrschendste Baumart der CH mit rund 48 Prozent als auch in Europa
ist die Fichte.
Gruss Werner5 (Werner)
Eine Frage die man wohl derzeit nicht eindeutig beantworten kann. Es ist eine recht exakte Schätzung möglich.
Mit sehr hoher Wahrscheinlichkeit sind dies Nadelbäume in der Taiga. Da dort auf Grund des harten Klimas eine geringe Artenvielfalt herrscht, überwiegen hier die Nadelbäume. Auch die Ausbeutung durch den Menschen wird durch das rauhe Klima doch sehr erschwert als in anderen Regionen unserer Erde.
Gemäß Expertern gelten die drei dort vorkommenden Baumarten als die häufigsten unserer Welt:
■ Kanadische oder Schimmelfichte (Picea glauca)
■ Dahurische Lärche (Larix gmelinii)
■ Sibirische Lärche (Larix sibirica)
Eine Statistik gibt es darüber aber nicht. Die drei Baumarten werden sozusagen von Experten als die Favoriten angesehen.
■ Die vorherrschendste Baumart der CH mit rund 48 Prozent als auch in Europa
ist die Fichte.
Gruss Werner5 (Werner)
Die nachweislich ältesten Bäume der Welt stehen ebenfalls in Kalifornien, in den White Mountains: Es sind die "Bristlecone Pines" oder Grannenkiefern (Pinus aristata). Ihr Holz zeigt etwa 100 Jahresringe auf einem Zentimeter. Der älteste von ihnen heißt "Methusaleh" und ist über 4.700 Jahre alt. Die Tamrit-Zypressen im algerischen Tassiligebirge sollen 4.000 bis 5.000 Jahre alt sein. Hier fehlt aber ebenso der exakte Beweis wie bei einer japanischen Sicheltanne auf der Insel Yakushima, die alles andere in den Schatten stellt: Ihr Alter wird auf ungefähr 7.000 Jahre geschätzt.
Gruss Werner5 (Werner)
Die nachweislich ältesten Bäume der Welt stehen ebenfalls in Kalifornien, in den White Mountains: Es sind die "Bristlecone Pines" oder Grannenkiefern (Pinus aristata). Ihr Holz zeigt etwa 100 Jahresringe auf einem Zentimeter. Der älteste von ihnen heißt "Methusaleh" und ist über 4.700 Jahre alt. Die Tamrit-Zypressen im algerischen Tassiligebirge sollen 4.000 bis 5.000 Jahre alt sein. Hier fehlt aber ebenso der exakte Beweis wie bei einer japanischen Sicheltanne auf der Insel Yakushima, die alles andere in den Schatten stellt: Ihr Alter wird auf ungefähr 7.000 Jahre geschätzt.
Gruss Werner5 (Werner)
Der wohl höchste Laubbaum der Welt.
Beschreibung
Der Riesen-Eukalyptus ist ein immergrüner Baum, der ein Alter von etwa 400 Jahren erreichen kann. Er bildet eine schmale Baumkrone an einem geraden Stamm aus. Die Rinde ist grau und an den untersten 5 bis 15 Metern grob gefurcht, darüber eher glatt.
Gruss Werner5 (Werner)
Der wohl höchste Laubbaum der Welt.
Beschreibung
Der Riesen-Eukalyptus ist ein immergrüner Baum, der ein Alter von etwa 400 Jahren erreichen kann. Er bildet eine schmale Baumkrone an einem geraden Stamm aus. Die Rinde ist grau und an den untersten 5 bis 15 Metern grob gefurcht, darüber eher glatt.
Gruss Werner5 (Werner)
Die Edle Tanne oder auch Silber-Tanne (Abies procera) genannt, hat die größten Zapfen aller Tannenarten. Diese sind oft so schwer, dass sich die Zweige nach unten biegen und die Tannenzapfen schräg nach unten hängen. Aufgrund der schönen blaugrünen Färbung und der Haltbarkeit der Nadeln ist die Edle Tanne ein sehr geschätzter Weihnachtsbaum.
Gruss Werner5 (Werner)
Die Edle Tanne oder auch Silber-Tanne (Abies procera) genannt, hat die größten Zapfen aller Tannenarten. Diese sind oft so schwer, dass sich die Zweige nach unten biegen und die Tannenzapfen schräg nach unten hängen. Aufgrund der schönen blaugrünen Färbung und der Haltbarkeit der Nadeln ist die Edle Tanne ein sehr geschätzter Weihnachtsbaum.
Gruss Werner5 (Werner)
Wer auf der Suche nach sehr langsam wachsenden Bäumen im Garten ist, der sollte eine Gewöhnliche Eibe (Taxus baccata), Grannen-Kiefer (Pinus aristata), Korea-Tanne (Abies koreana), Nobilis-Tanne (Abies procera, Syn.: Abies nobilis) oder Nordmann-Tanne (Abies nordmanniana) pflanzen.
Zu den schnellwachsenden Nadelbäumen im Garten mit mehr als 30 cm Längenwachstum im Jahr zählen die Gemeine Fichte (Picea abies), Koloradotanne (Abies concolor), Große Küstentanne (Abies grandis) und Waldkiefer (Pinus sylvestris).
Werner5 (Werner)
Wer auf der Suche nach sehr langsam wachsenden Bäumen im Garten ist, der sollte eine Gewöhnliche Eibe (Taxus baccata), Grannen-Kiefer (Pinus aristata), Korea-Tanne (Abies koreana), Nobilis-Tanne (Abies procera, Syn.: Abies nobilis) oder Nordmann-Tanne (Abies nordmanniana) pflanzen.
Zu den schnellwachsenden Nadelbäumen im Garten mit mehr als 30 cm Längenwachstum im Jahr zählen die Gemeine Fichte (Picea abies), Koloradotanne (Abies concolor), Große Küstentanne (Abies grandis) und Waldkiefer (Pinus sylvestris).
Gruss Werner5 (Werner)
Die größten Zapfen der Welt bei Nadelbäumen findet man bei der Zuckerkiefer (bis 60 cm lang und 25 cm breit), die mit Wuchshöhen um die 80 Meter auch die höchste aller Kiefernarten ist.
botanischer Name Pinus Palustris
botanische Familie Pinaceae
Vorkommen
Dies ist das schwerste, kommerziell genutzte Weichholz und wächst in den gesamten USA in einem Bogen von Virginia über Florida bis an den Golf von Mexiko.
Erscheinungsbild
Das cremerosafarbene Splintholz ist recht dünn und kontrastiert mit dem gelbroten bis rötlichbraunen Kernholz mit seiner auffälligen Wachstumsringzeichnung. Es ist harzig mit einer groben Textur.
Eigenschaften
Darrdichte liegt zwischen 650-690 kg/m³. Holz trocknet gut mit geringer Schwindung. Arbeitet kaum und verfügt über hohe Biege- und Druckfestigkeit, hohe Tragfähigkeit und mittlere Schlagfestigkeit. Nicht zum Dampfbiegen geeignet.
Verarbeitung
Kann gut von Hand und maschinell bearbeitet werden. Der Harzaustritt kann Probleme bereiten. Bietet guten Schrauben-, Nagel- und Klebehalt. Die Oberfläche läßt sich leicht behandeln.
Holzschutz
Moderat alterungsbeständig, wobei es hin und wieder zu Käferbefall kommt. Holz ist resistent gegen Holzschutzbehandlung, aber das Splintholz ist permeabel.
Verwendung
Konstruktionsholz, Dockanlagen, Rammpfähle, Brückenbau, Fahrzeugbau, Schiffbau, Außenbau, lnnenausbau, Bodenbeläge, Kisten, Paletten
Gruss Werner5 (Werner)
Botanischer Name Pinus Palustris
Botanische Familie Pinaceae
Vorkommen
Dies ist das schwerste, kommerziell genutzte Weichholz und wächst in den gesamten USA in einem Bogen von Virginia über Florida bis an den Golf von Mexiko.
Erscheinungsbild
Das cremerosafarbene Splintholz ist recht dünn und kontrastiert mit dem gelbroten bis rötlichbraunen Kernholz mit seiner auffälligen Wachstumsringzeichnung. Es ist harzig mit einer groben Textur.
Eigenschaften
Darrdichte liegt zwischen 650-690 kg/m³. Holz trocknet gut mit geringer Schwindung. Arbeitet kaum und verfügt über hohe Biege- und Druckfestigkeit, hohe Tragfähigkeit und mittlere Schlagfestigkeit. Nicht zum Dampfbiegen geeignet.
Verarbeitung
Kann gut von Hand und maschinell bearbeitet werden. Der Harzaustritt kann Probleme bereiten. Bietet guten Schrauben-, Nagel- und Klebehalt. Die Oberfläche läßt sich leicht behandeln.
Holzschutz
Moderat alterungsbeständig, wobei es hin und wieder zu Käferbefall kommt. Holz ist resistent gegen Holzschutzbehandlung, aber das Splintholz ist permeabel.
Verwendung
Konstruktionsholz, Dockanlagen, Rammpfähle, Brückenbau, Fahrzeugbau, Schiffbau, Außenbau, lnnenausbau, Bodenbeläge, Kisten, Paletten
Gruss Werner (Werner5)
Ich bin relativ neu auf dieser Web-Seite unterwegs. Daher habe ich auch wenig Erfahrung mit dieser Seite.
Ich hätte eine Frage dazu : Welches sind die Kriterien, um eine Baumart in der Liste aufzunehmen ?
Müssen es sehr hohe, oder Bäume mit extremem Stammesumfang sein ? Ausschliesslich ? Denn es fehlen ja viele Spezies, z.B. bei den Tannen (Abies). Kann mir jemand Auskunft geben, was da gefordert ist ? Oder ist es gewünscht, dass auch weniger bekannte Baumarten hier gespeichert werden ?
Vielen Dank im voraus für Eure Rückmeldungen.
Gruss
Werner (Werner5)
There are no hard criteria in what you can post. You have to feel the atmosphere. Initially it started with sequoiadendron. Later on it expanded to "monumental" trees. What that is, isn't specified. If you scroll the lists you see funny examples. You might see a Nothofagus obliqua as a monumental tree in the Netherlands with a circumference of 1,07 metres. That's not monumental if you see the worldwide collection. But it's the only one in the Netherlands. ! .
So there is your answer. You have to take in account what species it is, but also where the tree is located. I just registered an Aesculus californica with a hardly relevant circumference. But it's the only one in the Netherlands.
So if you want to register a Tilia x europaea somewhere in Germany I would say not lower than about 3 or 4 metres circumference and even then. But in Asia??? I don't know if there aren't registered any.
Kind regards and much fun
Wim
Thank you for your information. I have to explain you what I have done for my own : I work as a carpenter in a small carpentry in Switzerland. We produce only wooden toys for children. We use just local kind of woods and a limited sort.
But in my free time I built a data base of mainly trees of which I had an image of the tree and above all an image of the surface (texture) of the wood. I saved all information in an own programmed data base. I added all species mainly with the botanical name and aswell a common name of the tree or kind of wood. I have a list for example of all abies species with wood surface and also without wood surface. I also listed all subspecies of the abies varieties. I could show you this list, as an example. But I do not know how to upload Bitmaps in our discussions. I would like to show you my complete list of all Abies types. My relatively "old" database is written with Delphi (Object Turbo Pascal) with a 32-bit computer. At the moment I use a 64-bit Lap Top and I can not use this database with my newer computer. But I collected a huge amount of pictures of trees with botanical names. But all without indication of position around the world.
Please let me know, how I can upload Bitmaps to show you the complete list for example of Abies types.
Kind regards
Werner (Werner5)
And I do not know how to show or upload your list of trees in general. As I said you can register a tree on a specific location and add a picture and measurement of it.
Kind regards.
Thank you for your detailed explanations. Now I am sure that my information about trees are insufficient then I never have the accurate data about the location of the tree and also no measurements of the corresponding tree. It is more an enzylopedic collection of trees and woods. So the question was answered, thank you for that. As I could see, here on this collection of trees it is necessary to have the location and some measured data of the tree. And these data I do not have. Therefore I do not upload my data.
Kind Regards
Werner
on request I have now made it possible to add trees in Sierra Leone.
Kind regards,
Tim
Zou je svp Sierra Leone willen toevoegen?
Groet
WIm
Groeten,
Tim
I would like to inform you that today I have upgraded the systems behind this website so more photos can be stored.
This costs me some additional money each month but is covered by the Google ad fees (the financial model behind this site: ad fees (income) and hosting costs (costs) more or less in balance so the site can continue to exist for many many years to come). In the course of the next weeks I will make about 500-600 TB full resolution photos available for download again, as older photos were only visible in smaller format to save disk space. I saved these offline but now I have more disk space online, I will upload them again.
Kind regards,
Tim
Ich konnte keine Baum hinzufügen, weil ich das Pflanzjahr nicht weiß, vielleicht kann sich das mal jemand ansehen und mehr heraus bekommen.
Soms is de wijziging dat een boom is gestorven of omgezaagd niet verwerkt in het systeem van de database met bomen van die soort op volgorde van dikte of hoogte. Tim zal kunnen aangeven wat daarvan de oorzaak is, maar het blijkt meestal makkelijk te corrigeren, door de boom heel even weer als 'levend' te vermelden en vervolgens opnieuw als gestorven te melden. Dat heb ik bij deze moeraseik gedaan en nu staat hij inderdaad doorgestreept, dus als gestorven, in de lijsten.
Groeten, Jeroen
PS: vreemd genoeg werd mijn tekst na opslaan in drievoud weergegeven. Ik heb de bovenste tekst daarna nog iets aangepast maar kan de twee onderste niet verwijderen.
Soms is de wijziging dat een boom is gestorven of gekapt niet verwerkt in het systeem van de database met bomen van die soort op volgorde van dikte of hoogte. Tim zal kunnen aangeven wat daarvan de oorzaak is, maar het blijkt meestal makkelijk te corrigeren, door de boom heel even weer als 'levend' te vermelden en vervolgens opnieuw als gestorven te melden. Dat heb ik bij deze moeraseik gedaan en nu staat hij inderdaad doorgestreept, dus als dood, in de lijsten.
Groeten, Jeroen
Soms is de wijziging dat een boom is gestorven of gekapt niet verwerkt in het systeem van de database met bomen van die soort op volgorde van dikte of hoogte. Tim zal kunnen aangeven wat daarvan de oorzaak is, maar het blijkt meestal makkelijk te corrigeren, door de boom heel even weer als 'levend' te vermelden en vervolgens opnieuw als gestorven te melden. Dat heb ik bij deze moeraseik gedaan en nu staat hij inderdaad doorgestreept, dus als dood, in de lijsten.
Groeten, Jeroen
Ik ben in de loop der tijd meerdere bomen tegen gekomen die als dood of gekapt geregistreerd stonden, maar niet doorgestreept waren in het overzicht. Ik heb Tim er al eerder oop gewezen en hij heeft toen correcties aangebracht. Dank je voor de tip zodat ik het zelf kan doen en Tim niet hoef lastig te vallen.
■ Hyperion - Der höchste Baum der Welt
Der höchste Baum der Welt ist einer jener Küsten-Redwoods (Sequoia sempervirens). Erst im August 2006 wurde der 115 m hohe Gigant entdeckt und erhielt den Namen "Hyperion".
Der Hyperion ist der derzeit höchste anerkannte Baum der Welt (Stand 2007). Er ist ein Küstenmammutbaum (Sequoia sempervirens) im Redwood-Nationalpark in Kalifornien mit 115,55 m Wuchshöhe. Benannt wurde der Baum nach dem Titanen Hyperion in der griechischen Mythologie. Er löste 2007 den bisherigen Rekordhalter Stratosphere Giant, ebenfalls ein Küstenmammutbaum, ab.Hyperion wurde am 8. September 2006 von Chris Atkins und Michael Taylor entdeckt. Die Baumhöhe wurde vom Baumforscher Steve Sillet bestätigt. Weil Küstenmammutbäume extreme Flachwurzler sind und eine Verdichtung des Bodens durch Besucher die Wurzeln des Baumes schädigen kann, wird der exakte Standort des Baumes nicht veröffentlicht. Es ist daher nur die Lage des Waldgebiets, nicht aber die des individuellen Baumes bekannt: 41° 12′ 40″ N, 124° 0′ 10″ W
Wo genau der Hyperion steht, wird übrigens geheim gehalten – Behörden befürchten, dass Touristen den Boden um den Baum herum platt trampeln und damit die Wurzeln des Küstenmammutbaumes schädigen könnten.
Bis 1995 war das mit 112 Metern der "Tall Tree" im Redwood National Park. Dann brach seine Spitze ab und der "National Geographic Society Tree" aus demselben Park rückte auf Platz eins vor. Neuere Messungen im Park ergaben aber, dass der Küstenmammutbaum "Hyperion" mit 115,5 Meter Wuchshöhe als Rekordhalter.
"Stratosphere Giant" im Humboldt Redwoods State Park (Stammhöhe 112,87 Meter, zweithöchster Baum auf der Erde).
Der höchste Baum der Erde stand bis zum Anfang des Jahrhunderts (20.) in Australien. Das Exemplar einer dort beheimataten Eukalyptus - Art wurde nach dem herbeigeführten Fall mit rund 133 Meter Höhe und einem Stamm- durchmesser von 5.5 Metern eingemessen.
Mit einer Höhe von 132,58 Metern hält ein im 19. Jahrhundert gemessener australischer Rieseneukalyptus den historischen Rekord.
Sowohl die Eukalyptusbäume Australiens als auch die nordamerikanischen Mammutbäume der Art "Sequoia sempervirens" können über 100 Meter hoch werden. In der kalifornischen Küstenregion stehen auch die aktuellen Rekordhalter. Bis 1995 war das mit 112 Metern der "Tall Tree" im Redwood National Park. Dann brach seine Spitze ab und der "National Geographic Society Tree" aus demselben Park rückte auf Platz eins vor.
■ Die grösste Kastanie der Welt
Die grösste Kastanie der Welt steht in St. Alfio, Sizilien. Eine Sage berichtet, bereits im 14. Jahrhundert war sie so mächtig und ausladend, dass es einer Königin samt ihrem Gefolge von 100 Reitern gelang, unter ihrem Kronenmantel Schutz vor einem Unwetter gefunden zu haben.
■ Deutschlands höchster Baum
Mit 62.45 m ist eine Douglasie im Stadtwald von Ebernach bei Heidelberg der höchste Baum Deutschlands.
■ Der grösste Wacholder der Welt
Der grösste Wacholder der Weltist der „Bennett – Wacholder“ in Kalifornien.
Er soll über 2000 Jahre alt sein.
■ Der größte Cashewbaum der Welt
Wer unter diesem Baum spazieren geht, glaubt, er steht im Wald. Aufgrund eines genetischen Fehlers wachsen die Äste dieses Cashewbaumes am Strand von Parnamirim im Nordosten Brasiliens nicht nach oben, sondern zur Seite. Ihr eigenes Gewicht drückt die Äste schließlich an den Boden, wo sie neue Wurzeln schlagen - ein vermeintlich neuer Baum entsteht. Der Cashewbaum von Parnamirim hat mittlerweile die Größe eines Waldes erreicht. Er erstreckt sich auf eine Fläche von 8500 Quadratmetern.
Falls mir bei meinen Recherchen ein Fehler unterlaufen sein sollte, bitte melden.
Es grüsst Euch herzlich
Werner Reckholder (Werner5)
ich hätte eine Frage bezüglich der Fraxinus excelsior (Common Ash) "25171", welche entlang der Moosstraße in Freising zu finden ist. Wie alt schätzen Sie diesen Baum?
Ich würde mich sehr über eine Antwort freuen!
Mit vielen Grüßen
Lea
da Eschen unter günstigen Bedingungen recht zügig wachsen können und ich bei diesem Exemplar davon ausgehe, würde ich vielleicht grob die Tendenz 150 Jahre einschlagen. Auf jeden Fall älter als die Wohnsiedlung daneben, aber alles andere als unglaublich alt.
Viele Grüße
Tom
ich hätte eine Frage bezüglich der Fraxinus excelsior (Common Ash) "25171" entlang der Moosstraße in Freising, welche Sie meines Wissens nach 2020 zuletzt besucht und gemessen haben.
Wie alt würden Sie diesen Baum circa schätzen?
Ich würde mich sehr über eine Antwort freuen!
LG
Lea
Do you have a photo of this tree?
They are on the western side of Black Mountain Peninsula.
I have some photos but unfortunately cannot work out how to upload them to this site.
35° 17' 8.838" S
149° 5' 58.26" E
Het toeval is af en toe ondoorgrondelijk. Ik nam me gisteren voor een oude bekende op te zoeken. De Hemelboom in Bloemendaal en een paar bomen in Haarlem en éen in Amsterdam. Toen ik bij de boom in Bloemendaal was liet ik de dame in het huis voor de boom zien wat ik in het verleden fotografisch had vastgelegd. Ik wilde uitleggen dat het om de zo veel tijd meten zin heeft en inzicht geeft. Maar ik zag ineens een onbekende die een meting had toegevoegd.
Later op de dag zag ik dat jij me zo'n 3 uur voor was. Merkwaardig. En leuk. Welkom in de gemeenschap. Ik heb de meting ook gedaan en kwam 1 cm hoger.
Tot mijn ergernis lukte mijn Amsterdams avontuur niet. Ik ben tot 3x toe vastgelopen in afgesloten wegen. Ik kon de Falckstraat niet bereiken. Maar ja...Amsterdam.. achterlijke provincie .. Ik heb steeds meer weerzin tegen die anarchistische enclave.
Groet en nogmaals welkom.
Grappig dat jij die boom ook net kwam meten. Ik ben een half jaar geleden voor de bomenstichting actief geworden, vooral om een wandelboekje 'Langs monumentale bomen in Haarlem' te maken. Ik hoop dat dat volgend jaar gaat lukken. Via Jeroen ben ik toen ook boominspecteur geworden. Ik doe vooral mijn best de bomen in Haarlem netjes in het register te hebben en af en toe loop ik met een vriend door aanpalende gemeenten en inventariseren we een paar bomen. Jouw naam ben ik natuurlijk al menigmaal tegen gekomen. Laat het weten als je nog eens in de buurt bent, dan kunnen we kennismaken en mogelijk samen op pad.
Mvrgr, Gerard (06-49859860)
Dat is een mooi initiatief. Haarlem is een belangrijke plaats qua bomen, Al is het maar omdat Zocher hier zijn domicilie zocht in de 19de eeuw. Dat is een bron van ontdekkingen wat mij betreft. Ik ontdekte een paar jaar geleden bijvoorbeeld de Castanea sativa in het Florapark. Die was er zonder ZOcher zekr nooit geweest. Maar ook Haarlem is niet vrij van zeewind en dat is niet altijd goed voor bomen. Mijn Haagse en Wassenaarse ervaringen relativeren dat enorm.
Graag bereid tot samen denken en onderzoeken. (En ik ben ook al jaren boominspecteur bij de Bomenstichting)
Groet
Wim
Mvrgr, Gerard
First of all great idea for the site!
I noticed that currently the map is not configured correctly, do you need help for fixing this ?
Today I tried to add a new tree. It didn't work. I couldn't register it. Tried twice. Got the message that the webmaster was informed, but I'll let you know via this way, so others can take notice.
Thanks. Now it works again. Aiaia but the coördinates are missing and cannot add or change them..
https://www.bbc.com/news/uk-england-tyne-66947040
I know you are aware of the insult that's happening when people can overscribe other one's posts. I have too often experienced I placed a measurement and someone else places a new one a tiny bit higher and my measurement disappears. This is not acceptible in my opinion. What do you think? I know it's on your agenda but does it have enough urge? And do you have enough time to deal with it?
It is however a fact that any measurement is kept in the system, only the most recent one in a given year is shown.
It is on the list of things to improve once my small children are older and I have more time (absolutely none at the moment, not even able to read the hundreds of mails I'm getting).
Kind regards,
Tim
Fantastic tree. Thanks for registering. But I think it is not a Ceiba. Some kind of Ficus is more likely. The guy in the article you added, thinks Ficus albipila. I'd rather think Benghalensis or benjamina.
https://www.facebook.com/ancientforests/posts/2913687152220425/?paipv=0&eav=Afaf2x1hm7D9jMZeFgLPqTJmZwwb00GpBuR1Ee0z0uU1LaFWXVHbnLj7cpKYSMFsXn8&_rdr
DBZT
DBZT
We don't have a photo of flowers and leaves, I prefer to leave it, better than make a mistake twice.
Can you please remove Quercus x ludoviciana? It is Quercus nigra 'Beethoven' The relevant items are changed in this way conform Owen's remarks.
It was registered as Q x ludoviciana and I must have misinterpreted your earlier contribution in which you made your point concerning Q. nigra Beethoven.
Our original discussion about Q. nigra 'Beethoven' referred to a single younger tree in the Netherlands.
A question for you:are you italian?Se si scrivi in italiano grazie.
Zit er een zoekfunctie op de site van Monumentale bomen?
Zijn er monumentale bomen op het terrein van st claralaan 1 te eindhoven (clarissen klooster)?
Bedankt voor je antwoord, maar ik krijg geen monumentale bomen te zien in het ommuurde deel van het clarissenkloosters, uitsluiten bomen "in de buurt van". klopt dit?
Ik snap heel goed dat je niet op alles kunt reageren. Deze site is tenslotte een hobby voor je. Maar ik krijg stelelmatig geen reactie en erger belemmeringen. En dat terwijl ik in het verleden een grote aanjager ben geweest voor Duitsers en Italianen. Ik heb denk ik ook de meeste posts in België gemaakt van allen. Ik heb destijds in die landen stevige posts gemaakt en er volgden allerlei mensen enthousiast. Dat weet je donders goed. Ook heb ik gemakzuchtige posts van Leo Goudzwaard zonder ophef gecorrigeerd en aangevuld.
Als je meent mij nu te moeten irriteren...doe het dan openlijk en eerlijk svp.
Groet
Wim
Ik probeer een nieuwe ondersoort van Morus nigra toe te voegen. Dat lukt niet meer. Dat gaf nooit problemen tot nu toe.
Vond het wel een bijzonder verhaal. De boom staat wel in het Landelijk Register van Monumentale Bomen dat beheerd wordt door de Bomenstichting. Zie bomen.meetnetportaal.nl/index.php? en ga naar boom met Boom ID: 1691134.
Groet, Maarten
Zeker heb ik het gelezen. Ik heb de boom direct hier geregistreerd en het artikel toegevoegd in de beschrijving. Bijzonder exemplaar. Bij de bomenstichting staat ook een meting uit 2001, maar die is onvoldoende specifiek. Er wordt 1,50 meter aangegeven zonder hoogtebepaling en aangezien de boom ligt....De boom is ook moeilijk te meten. Ik denk dat ik één dezer dagen nog even langs ga om te kijken wat ik kan doen.
Groet
Wim
Mooi dat je herm geregistreerd hebt. Zou mooi zijn als je bij bezoek aan de boom betere foto's kan maken dan die nu op de site vd BS (Bomenstichting) staan. De foto bij het artikel in Boomzorg is als stuk beter.
Het plantjaar op de site van BS behoeft ook wel enige aanpassing. Goed idee om het stuk uit Boomzorg bij de boom te plaatsen, ik zal dat op de site van BS ook doen.
Hartelijke groet,
Maarten
Gracias
Thank you for this information - it’s much appreciated. I came across an old Wildlife magazine on ancient trees a few weeks back and found it fascinating - it’s making me look at trees in a whole new light, and I love how there are so many monumental trees in Worcs.
It is likely either a silver fir or grand fir. Measured 47,2 meters in LIDAR and looks really big.
Mvg
Dirk
Kennelijk is de juiste benaming voor deze boom Quercus nigra "Beethoven". Als je het er mee eens bent, wil je hem dan veranderen?. Ik wil het ook doen voor je. Owen Johnson leverde het volgende artikel.
https://www.internationaloaksociety.org/content/hybrid-highlight-quercus-%C3%97ludoviciana-sarg )
Groet
Ik ben nu in Valencia en heb deze boom gevonden
Ficus Histórico
https://maps.app.goo.gl/33EJE2bPp72LTJgT9
Maar ik kan hem niet binnen deze site vinden.(of ik zoek niet goed)
Kan iemand mij helpen.
Grtjs
https://www.monumentaltrees.com/en/heightrecords/world/
Specifically sitka spruce, western redcedar, Douglas fir, and possibly others do not match the records on those trees' pages. Is it at all possible that this could be fixed?
Thanks!
Regards
Kouta from Germany
They don't have a page for each tree, but you can search for it on here:
https://bigtrees.forestry.ubc.ca/bc-bigtree-registry/conifers/
They also have a location map, where more info on each tree can be found if you click the location:
Measurements from the BC Big Tree Registry
https://bigtrees.forestry.ubc.ca/bc-bigtree-registry/conifers/
In addition you should change the year. The BC Registry gives the measurement year.
I saw that a couple of years ago you climbed the sequoia of Chateau Bleu in Trooz. Sad to inform you that this tree is struck by lightning last month. The tree survived, but it will never grow as tall as before.
Rgds,
Nardo
Als een boom gekapt is blijft de leeftijdteller doorlopen.
Groet
Wim
Bij het uploaden van foto's was er een mogelijkheid om foto's te uploaden van een boom, een specifieke locatie en van een groepje bomen. Die functie werkt sinds enige tijd niet meer.
Groet
Wim
In the summer of 2022, the world-famous British artist Antony Gormley (1950) took over the Voorlinden museum and estate. With his sculptures, installations and art in public space, Gormley explores the relationship between the human body and the space around us. The GROUND retrospective shows his extensive oeuvre, from his lead sculptures from the 1980s to his most recent installations. The exhibition could be seen from May 26 to September 25, 2022. This sculpture is one of many that he has placed. Men in varying meditative poses.
Gefeliciteerd met de vondst en bevestiging!
Groeten, Jeroen
I'll change it.
I've added the girth measured by Aubrey Fennell in 2010 for what I assume is the same tree - the larger of two big old Sitkas along this track (I've not been to Downhill myself). At that time it was only about 38m tall to the highest live growth after dying back, but it seems to have regrown very well since then - in an exposed place.
In 2000, Co. Derry had one marginally taller tree, a 46.5m Sitka at the private Drenagh estate.
To resolve this, I think only certain people, or the person who registered or uploaded something, should be able to remove it. Otherwise, you should be able to "report" something of someone else's if you feel it should be removed.
While on the topic of the functioning of this site, I have noticed some bugs in my time on here. I am aware this site is quite old, so I guess that is to be expected. But anyway, here they are:
-after you add a new location, city, or village while adding a new tree, it will not let you give the exact location. It will jump to the tree's age section. Because the exact location is mandatory for adding a new tree, you must re-fill out everything again once you've added the new place. This is very annoying for me, and was also very confusing when I first joined.
-Also about adding a new tree, when you select "I don't know" for the trees age, you must re-click it in order to allow the next option. This one is more minor, but is still a bit confusing for new users.
-Not really a bug, but there is no warning that says all photos must be in the .jpg format, so it's kind of frustrating when trying to add a photo of a different format. The solution to this one easy, just add some text that says only .jpg's are allowed.
-If you sort photos by an option where there are no results, all the sorting options will disappear too. Making it impossible to view the photos until it eventually automatically resets to the default sorting option.
And the numbers on the front page are out of date, by the way.
Does anyone else have these problems? Or is it just me.
SInce a few months adding information, trees, loction or something else isn't working correct. What I am doing lately, is skipping to another location, tree or subject and from then on it is normally possible to scroll further and jump to the next box.
And your vandalism remark is intriguing. It is nice to realize that until now there haven't been any problems, but indeed things can change.
https://scientias.nl/eindelijk-verklaring-voor-mysterieuze-gaatjes-in-nederlandse-bomen/
WB 21-7-2023
In the recent years the Chinese have started to search and measure trees with modern instruments with imposing results: Pinus bhutanica 77 m, Taiwania 72 m in China and 84 m in Taiwan, Abies chensiensis 83 m. Now they have found a 102.3-metre Cupressus gigantea (= Cupressus torulosa var. gigantea) in Tibet, and Miehe's estimate begins to sound plausible.
See photos, video and description here:
https://news.cgtn.com/news/2023-05-27/102-3-meters-The-tallest-tree-in-Asia-found-in-Xizang-China--1k95F5TYksU/index.html?fbclid=IwAR3uXDrmFI839kK72j7eVBg-f5TpjqqT0r_iR993N5CjoHI9DlHERnNbI14
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=dCU93Rghb-Q
https://www.globaltimes.cn/page/202305/1291477.shtml
The only thing to suspect is which point at the base they used for measuring the tree. We know that the height of the tallest Shorea ("Menara") was inflated by 3 m by reporting the measurement to the lowest part of the buttress. This could be the case for the cypress, too, as it grows on a steep slope.
Conifers, quickly this afternoon you went there, to that canyon in Tibet, to see the tree, and you and that Didier verified that the cypress is not torulosa , definitely. Thank you very much, I don't know what would be of us or the Chinese without you and Didier.
Kouta, are you going to upload the tree, or are you waiting for something? It can be put in Tongmai, with approximate location.
We have in MT:
Cupressus cashmeriana (7), Cupressus corneyana (3), Cupressus gigantea (1) and Cupressus torulosa (7).
Himalayan is very big , what can we do with this ?
First point is that Cupressus torulosa can easily be discounted; it only occurs in the western Himalaya, from the Kali Gandaki (mid-west Nepal) west to Kashmir. The Yarlung Tsangpo gorge is over 1,200 km east of the easternmost locations for C. torulosa. It is also distinct in foliage (example here).
Cupressus gigantea does grow much more close by, but is further to the north, importantly on the dry side of the Himalaya, whereas these trees are in the temperate monsoon rainforest on the south side of the Himalaya crest.
More later on the others, too late in the evening to go into details now!
In my opinion, taxonomically speaking, the genus cupressus in Asia is currently chaotic, so we have to accept provisionally what the Chinese say.
The tree is obviously called C. torulosa, because Tibetan cypress is sometimes considered a variety of C. torulosa, as C. torulosa var. gigantea. In the news agency, they have thought it is enough to give the taxon in species level.
It says here that C gigantea and C turolosa are two genetically different species
And here, in " Taxonomy"
http://www.cupressus.net/bulletin.html
we can see the complexity of the genus in the Himalayas, and besides that , hybridizations and subspecies.
Cupressus cashmeriana does not grow wild in Bhutan. The estimate by Miehe is wrong. The discovered tree at 102 m. is a Cupressus austrotibetica and it has nothing to do with either C.torulosa or C.gigantea. To put gigantea as a variety of torulosa shows that Farjon was prejudiced and never saw living material of those two species growing together. All those species have very different distribution ranges which do not overlap. They are all isolated in valleys separated by high mountains.
Is an accurate location for this tree, or at least the group of trees it is in, available?
I think we can safely reject C. torulosa s.str. as it is today considered an western Himalayan species, indeed. Conifers also had a good point that the youtube video says "Tibetan cypress" = C. gigantea. Silba (the author of C. austrotibetica) has a serious credibility problem, so I am convinced we should follow the view of the researchers, who likely wrote the description on youtube until there are more detailed studies from the area.
As for the measurements, apart ignoring from where on the base they measured it, I see in the large photo that it seems to have a few meters of the upper tip dry, I don't know if that matters.
It is true that Silba has a "credibility problem", but he did do more serious work on Cupressus than on other genera, and conversely, Farjon's (it was he who treated it within C. torulosa) highly 'lumping' viewpoint has been shown wrong in numerous cases in Cupressus and many other genera. There is also no doubt from both herbarium material and cultivated trees that there is a distinct cypress in this region that is not the same as C. gigantea; Silba does deserve credit for spotting that. It is easy to forget just how dramatic the changes in climate and growing conditions are over surprisingly short distances in this region; the habitat of the new trees is clearly temperate rainforest, while the C. gigantea site is a thousand metres or more higher altitude and a much drier rain-shadow climate. A comparable example would be to equate the new trees with Sequoia sempervirens (tall and relatively slender in a mild wet climate), and C. gigantea with Sequoiadendron giganteum (drier, colder, climate; less tall but stouter trunks).
Here a study from ten years ago on the distribution of cupressus in the eastern Himalayas, with a nice map, where Arunachal Pradesh is Chinese.
In the number 24 of the Bulletin of Cupressus Conservation Project,
http://www.cupressus.net/bulletin.html, 31-12-2021,
there is a lot of information about cupressus in the area of Tongmai, and beautiful photos.
Kouta : Seeing how rough the terrain is, I think you've set the location too far from Tongmai.
on the youtube film, we can clearly see at the extremity of the gorge the summit of the Namcha Barwa (7782 m) ; it confirms the location in the upper Yarlung Zangpo Canyon.
I have changed to the new location, see what you think compared to the video.
I am wondering how many people here saw a Cupressus austrotibetica. If they would have see one, they would know that it is one of the most easy species to distinguish from all other Cupressus species.
To change the species completely, you would have to delete the tree and upload them again, which is more complicated, so it is better to leave the rectification written in "Edit".
Even this last tree you can add your opinion about the species by editing it and writing what you want.
Thank you.
We accept dead tops.
I guess we will soon get more information about this stand. I am almost sure the measurers will write an article to a scientific journal about their study.
Let's remember that the Chinese science has advanced with huge steps and is already in many brances in the same level with the western science.
Sequoia, DO NOT start to change cypress species names!! Ernesto, you should NOT encourage anybody anonymous to do that! We want to name the trees after generally accepted standards. This is not a place for revolutionaries!
The Parlung Tsangpo is a tributary of the Yarlung Tsangpo. They are two different rivers, of course.
To name that record tree Cupressus gigantea is the most stupid thing from someone who does not know anything about cypresses, their different distribution areas, their morphologies and molecular analyses. Even when all is written in the Bulletin of the Cupressus Conservation Project with maps and great details.
Now the Chinese (they are much, much better with molecular analyses than the western researchers, but for taxonomy they are unfortunately still a lot behind following blindly some foreign taxonomy) seem to favour Cupressus rushforthii for an unknown and mistaken reason. The locality of this tree will not be disclosed for protection reasons. Rightfully so.
Cupressus austrotibetica is an accepted name here:
https://powo.science.kew.org/taxon/urn:lsid:ipni.org:names:936130-1
I have no indulgence for people who don't want to make the effort to read freely available scientific articles.
Sorry.
And of course I will change nothing. It is not worth throwing pearls to swines.
Sorry again.
Dans The Gymnosperm Database (qui assimile C. austrotibetica à C. duclouxiana ou à une sous-espèce de celui-ci), je lis ceci :
''Description : Arbres jusqu'à 25 m de haut et 80 cm de dhp. Couronne conique lorsqu'elle est jeune, arrondie ou largement bombée lorsqu'elle est âgée. Branches minces et horizontales, densément disposées'', etc... Cela ne semble pas correspondre au cyprès de 102 m, bien que certaines photos ou images anciennes font état de grands arbres coniques. L'aire de répartition, par contre, incluant le S.E. du Tibet, correspond bien.
L'aire et l'écologie de C. torulosa, par contre, ne correspondent pas. Donc on peut éliminer.
Quant à C. gigantea, l'aire correspond parfaitement (exclusivement le S.E. du Tibet), ainsi que le port ''irrégulièrement conique'' et la taille (spécimens de + de 50 m déjà répertoriés) ; je cite TGD : ''Distribution et écologie : Au sud-est du Tibet, dans la vallée du fleuve Yarlung Zangbo (Tsangpo) à une altitude de 3 000 à 3 400 m (Farjon 1998 , Fu et al. 1999). Il pousse également dans les vallées des rivières Nyang et Nize (Debreczy et Racz 2011). Voir la section Big Tree pour un lien Google Maps où vous pouvez explorer la répartition des bosquets le long de la vallée''.
Je veux bien que Farjon, TGD et beaucoup d'autres se trompent, et je suis prêt à admettre ton hypothèse, mais une chose m'interroge : en l'absence de vues détaillées des feuilles, des fruits et du reste, comment peux-tu être aussi sûr que l'on a affaire à un C. austrotibetica ?
Le doute n'est donc pas facile à lever entre C. austrotibetica et C. gigantea. Donc je le répète : possèdes-tu des données sur la forme des feuilles et des fruits, et disposes-tu d'analyses palynologiques ?
The translation I am offered says: "As for C. gigantea, the area corresponds perfectly (exclusively the S.E. of Tibet)". If this is an accurate translation, this statement I fear is not correct; 'S. E. Tibet' is a huge area, and because of the extreme high altitudes involved, climatic changes are abrupt, over very short distances and altitudes. The sites are about 80 km apart, but importantly because of the positions of the mountain massifs, Cupressus gigantea is on a relatively dry site (rain shadow of the ridge SW from Namche Barwa summit), while Cupressus austrotibetica is, as the photos clearly show, in rainforest (monsoon track funnelled up the Tsangpo Gorge, with no high ridges to capture the monsoon rain). It is also nearly 900 metres lower altitude, so its temperatures are, on average, roughly 9°C warmer. So the two do not correspond at all in their habitat or climatic conditions.
Further on, I am offered this translation: "but one thing puzzles me: in the absence of detailed views of the leaves, fruits and the rest, how can are you also sure that we are dealing with a C. austrotibetica?". For this, I can understand your scepticism, but two points to mention: (1) Cupressus austrotibetica has, for the entire genus, uniquely slender, thread-like shoots. The very fine structure of the foliage of the 102 metre tree agrees with this. And (2), herbarium specimens from the immediate vicinity - while not from this tree, but from trees likely within direct sight of it - are available for examination, and are of Cupressus austrotibetica. There are no herbarium specimens of Cupressus gigantea (or any other Cupressus species) in this immediate vicinity.
Hope this helps!
Conifers is right,climatic changes are abrupt, over very short distances and altitudes.According to the information I have obtained, C.torulosa is native to the west of the Kali Gandaki River in the Himalayas; C. austrotibetica is mainly distributed in dry-hot valleys in eastern Tibet and western Sichuan; C. gigantea is distributed along the Yarlung Zangbo River and Niyang River at an altitude of 3000m~3500m On dry river beaches, and the number of adults does not exceed 50,000; therefore, these three species can be excluded only from the distribution.
In fact, C.rushforthii is only distributed in the valleys of the Palong Zangbo River and the Yigong Zangbo River at an altitude of 2200m~3000m. The forests in these valleys are temperate rainforests, similar to the forests on the northwest coast of North America.
1) I do not seize why you exclude C. austrotibetica, whose all scientific publications attribuate the same geographic repartition than the giant tree, and wet and low situations, not dry ones ;
2) C. rushfortii do not reach such a gigantism, and its shape is not columnar.
Remark : Frank Ludlow in 1957 wrote :
''One march beyond Trulung brought us to an encampment opposite the village of Tangme (Tangmai), where the (Po) Yigrong and (Po) Tsangpo meet, and here on a spur overlooking the junction grew specimens of Cupressus torulosa which exceeded in size any tree I have seen in the Himalayas. One trunk we measured was 36 ft in girth at 5 ft from the ground, and we estimated its height at over 200 ft. These monarchs grew sparingly, but such was their magnificence that they were discernible from afar, towering aloft above the heads of all their rivals.''
I thing Ludlow spoke about our 102 m tree. Ludlow calls it a C. torulosa, so for him this giant tree was very similar to this species.
Regards
Kouta from Germany
1) I found few evidence that C. austrotibetica grows in humid low-lying areas, and many articles point out that the height of C. austrotibetica is usually below 20m;
2) C. rushfortii is a newly published species, and the past records are indeed lower than 70m, but it should also be noted that trees of the same species can have huge differences in morphology under different growth environments, especially in a place that climate changes so abrupt.
I searched for more information. In fact, the Beijing News conducted an exclusive interview with expert who participated in the scientific research of the tree.
Here is the interview address: https://mp.weixin.qq.com/s/s9wFlQdYavF3ZFFXOLyYhw
During the interview, the person in charge of the Xizijiang Ecological Conservation Center gave some information. He and Guo Qinghua's team from Peking University inspected the giant tree.
1) This tree belongs to C. rushforthii, but this new species has not been included in the national plant protection list of China. For better protection, it is disclosed as C. austrotibetica.
2) The expedition team measured a 86m-high C.rushforthii last year and noticed the potential of C.rushforthii in height.
3) After measurement, they found that the diameter of the tree was 293cm, the height from the lowest point to the top of the tree was 104.6m, and the median value was 102.3m.
4) In addition to this tree, they also found 25 large trees over 90m in Tongmai.
In addition, I think the species seen by Professor Frank Ludlow is C. rushfortii, but it is also located in the Pan-Himalayan region, and C. rushfortii was not published at that time, so he thinks it is C. torulosa. However, the distribution of C. rushfortii is very narrow, only located in the valleys of Parlung Tsangpo and Yigong Tsangpo.
I added girth 920 cm (calculated from the diameter) and corrected the measuring date. I also added note "Height to the lowest point of the trunk: 104.6 m. Height to the average ground level: 102.3 m." and a link to the Chinese article.
So I think we should change the species to C. rushforthii. My former suggestion that the species should be called C. gigantea was based on the formerly linked articles, which said it is C. torulosa, which is apparently impossible (but possible if considered C. torulosa var. gigantea).
zhichuliao, if you are aware of other accurate Chinese measurements you are very welcome to add them on this website. Also for lower species, like oaks etc.
Btw, I suppose those Tibetan forests are not very similar with those of the Pacific Northwest of North America. The latter region has relatively dry summers (with wet autumn, winter and spring) whereas SE Tibet likely has a monsoon climate with very heavy precipitation in summer. The photos also show that there is a strong broadleaf component in the forest composition whereas the Pacific NW forests are almost pure coniferous forests, likely results from the mentioned climatic differences.
Kouta
Btw, I think I may not have expressed well the similarities between the forests of Parlung Tsangpo and Pacific Northwest of North America (the former is relatively humid in summer, while the latter is more humid in winter), they have something in common: year-round high Humidity, low wind speed, tall trees on a genetic level, etc.
In addition, the extremely high proportion of coniferous trees in the forests of the Nearctic may be related to the glacial period—They have high adaptability to the cold. Even in Florida, there are pure coniferous forests of Bald cypress trees. But this rarely occurs in the Palearctic at the same latitude.
I hope all are happy with this change.
DB, the Chinese scientists, who studied the tree on the spot, say it is C. rushforthii. I suppose they have done precise observations and analysis. It is difficult to make more precise observations and analysis from online photos.
zhichuliao, you are right in that the conditions in the past is an important factor determining today's forest composition. Similarly, in Tasmania, for example, with quite similar climate with the Pacific Northwest, there are almost no conifers in the forest composition.
“Chinese researchers published it as a new species in 2021.”
Cupressus rushforthii was discovered by Keith Rushforth. He is not Chinese.
This new species was described by two authors. None is Chinese.
Lies #2 and #3:
“C. austrotibetica is mainly distributed in dry-hot valleys in eastern Tibet and western Sichuan.”
This species is not distributed in “dry-hot valleys”. Cupressus gigantea is. (If a climate can be described as “hot” at 3000m altitude.)
C. austrotibetica is not present in Sichuan.
Lie #4:
“In fact, C.rushforthii is only distributed in the valleys of the Palong Zangbo River and the Yigong Zangbo River at an altitude of 2200m~3000m.”
C. rushforthii in China is only known currently from two trees close to the road East of Tangmai and close to Tangdui. Apart from those two specimens, the distribution area is unknown. There is no record of this species in the Yigong valley where C. austrotibetica is present.
Lies #5 and #6:
“I found few evidence that C. austrotibetica grows in humid low-lying areas, and many articles point out that the height of C. austrotibetica is usually below 20m;”
There is no reference that C. austrotibetica grows on dry areas. There is no article about C.austrotibetica saying it is "usually below 20".
All witnesses (Bailey, Ludlow, Rushforth, Businsky, etc.) point that C. austrotibetica is a huge tree. Ludlow wrote that he estimated it over 200 feet. And the types of C. austrotibetica chosen by Silba were collected by Ludlow and Bailey. Typical ignorance of the rules of taxonomy.
Lie #7:
“I think the species seen by Professor Frank Ludlow is C. rushfortii”
The types of C. austrotibetica chosen by Silba were collected by Ludlow and Bailey. Typical ignorance of the rules of taxonomy.
Lie #7:
“the distribution of C. rushfortii is very narrow, only located in the valleys of Parlung Tsangpo and Yigong Tsangpo.”
See lie #4.
Lie #8:
“but possible if considered C. torulosa var. gigantea”
This combination by Farjon is invalid. C. torulosa var. majestica Carrière has priority. C. austrotibetica and C. gigantea are two different species with quite distinct separated ranges.
Lie #9:
“In the absence of more information, it is reasonable to designate this species as C. rushforthii.”
There is enough information. All is written in the Bulletin of the Cupressus Conservation Project: diagnoses, range maps, complete list of herbarium specimens, taxonomy, photos of huge trees belonging all to C.austrotibetica. Nobody is free to pick up a name randomly like some are doing here. Every species has a description and is fixed by type(s) in herbaria and localities.
Error #10:
“There is an estimate of 95 metres for Cupressus cashmeriana in Bhutan by Miehe.”
This specimen is not a C. cashmeriana which is not present wild in Bhutan, but a C. tortulosa.
The estimation is erroneous. It is not 95m.
[edit: cross-posted with Sequoia]
Response 1# You are right, I didn't review the author carefully before.
Response 2#3#5#6# In Chinese, C. austrotibetica is written as "Southtibetan cypress", while C. torulosa is written as "Tibetan cypress", which causes me some confusion. The tree that is distributed in Sichuan and rarely exceeds 20m in height should be C. torulosa (this is controversial), as rushforth says "there is considerable variation in eastern Asian Cupressus, variation that is not encompassed fully by is not encompassed fully by modern taxonomic treatments".
"If a climate can be described as "hot" at 3000m altitude." In some rain shadows in the Hengduan Mountains, river valleys at 3000m altitude are also dry and benefit from plateau effects It can also be very hot during the day. Simple experience does not apply.
Response 4#7# Li Cheng from Xizijiang Ecology Center (one of the people who measured this tree) mentioned that this tree belongs to C. rushforthii, and that 25 other trees over 90m also belong to C. rushforthii. Also Li mentioned on social media that there are many C. rushforthii in the Palungzangbo valley.
Response 9# Yes, "There is enough information written in the Bulletin of the Cupressus Conservation Project: diagnoses, range maps, complete list diagnoses, range maps, complete list of herbarium specimens, taxonomy, photos of huge trees,etc". This is not sufficient reason to map this tree to a particular species, especially if you have not visited it in the field. Before getting more information, it would be more sensible to trust the conclusions of the expedition teams, Xizijiang Ecological Conservation Center, Guo Qinghua of Peking University, Shanshui Conservation Center, they are all very professional organizations.You can check the website of shanshui.
http://www.shanshui.org/
What can be emphasized is what Li said, This tree belongs to C. rushforthii, but this new species has not been included in the national plant protection list of China, while C. austrotibetica is written in it. For better protection, it is disclosed as C. austrotibetica.
You probably mean it is discosed as C. torulosa? In the articles in English, it has described as C. torulosa, like here:
https://news.cgtn.com/news/2023-05-27/102-3-meters-The-tallest-tree-in-Asia-found-in-Xizang-China--1k95F5TYksU/index.html?fbclid=IwAR3uXDrmFI839kK72j7eVBg-f5TpjqqT0r_iR993N5CjoHI9DlHERnNbI14
I have not seen any sources describing it as C. austrotibetica, apart from this thread.
It would be a miracle if the Chinese researchers did not write a scientific paper about the stand. Thus, let's wait in peace for more information.
Kouta,you are right.C. rushfortii may not be the final word for it, and now we just have to wait for a more scientific definition from the relevant papers.
I never had expected such was possible, a true Cypress close to, or even more than 100m in height!
https://www.facebook.com/groups/BigTreeSeekers/posts/3526536264330262/
Somebody posts photos of the "102-metre tree" with a climber. However, in the interview the researcher said, the tree was NOT climbed due to conservation issues. Apparently the photos are of another tree in another stand?
No, the stands are not the same. The one from the video is on the left bank of the Parlung Tsganpo opposite the road, while the 102.3m tree is on the left bank of the Yigong Tsangpo.
All these giant cypresses are Cupressus austrotibetica. Except Conifers and DBZT it looks like nobody read the article:
"Cupressus rushforthii, a new cypress species in Xizang, China, with an introduction on the Chinese cypresses and a survey of C. austrotibetica."
Note: "a survey of C.austrotibetica".
And more lies.
The max temperature for Milin in Summer is below 23°C. It is not very hot, it is not even hot.
"many articles point out that the height of C. austrotibetica is usually below 20m"
Which articles? In Chinese scientific articles I could find only 2 articles mentioning C. austrotibetica. And none says something about its height. Moreover, Silba's diagnosis reads: "Arbor ad 20-60 m. alta" that is usually more than 20 m high.
"C. rushfortii is a newly published species, and the past records are indeed lower than 70m"
The maximum size of C.rushforthii is unknown. There is no "past record" of that species. There is no herbarium sheet of that species in the Chinese harbariums.
"This tree belongs to C. rushforthii, but this new species has not been included in the national plant protection list of China. For better protection, it is disclosed as C. austrotibetica."
Total nonsense. Taxonomy and conservation are two different matters. Taxonomy is not under the influence of conservation while conservation needs taxonomy.
"I think the species seen by Professor Frank Ludlow is C. rushfortii"
A lie and a stupid comment as Ludlow specimens were used as the type and paratype of C.austrotibetica. The second paratype by Bailey is close to the locality of the 102.3m tree.
"In Chinese, C. austrotibetica is written as "Southtibetan cypress", while C. torulosa is written as "Tibetan cypress", which causes me some confusion."
Common names are variable, hence the use of Latin names. You can name it as you want, it has no bearing on the only scientific name which is in Latin. If you have no knowledge on taxonomy, educate yourself first.
The worst thing is that you are doing all to bring the confusion from common names over to the Latin names. Care about your common names as you want, but stay away from the Latin names.
"In some rain shadows in the Hengduan Mountains, river valleys at 3000m altitude are also dry and benefit from plateau effects It can also be very hot during the day. Simple experience does not apply."
Drought and heat are two different things. Meteorological data do apply. The max temperature for Milin in Summer is below 23°C. It is not very hot, it is not even hot.
"Li Cheng from Xizijiang Ecology Center (one of the people who measured this tree) mentioned that this tree belongs to C. rushforthii"
And what is Li Cheng experience with cypress taxonomy? None. No article, nothing. Did he read the original article about C.rushforthii and C.austrotibetica? By giving the wrong Latin name to those giant trees, he will make a fool of himself and only bring more confusion in taxonomy.
The people in charge of conservation should direct their activities to care about Cupressus fallax when already two populations have or will be destroyed by dams. The Parlung and Yigong valleys are under study to analyse if they are fit for dam buildings.
"This is not sufficient reason to map this tree to a particular species, especially if you have not visited it in the field."
The maps are done on the basis of herbarium sheets. How do you know if I did not visit those valleys? You know nothing. Please, have a look at the backcover page of the journal where the article about C.rushforthii is published.
"For better protection, it is disclosed as C. austrotibetica."
Again: conservation has no bearing on taxonomy. About protection: Cupressus gigantea is on the red list. Do you want to know what happened to many of those cypresses when a road was built along the Yarlung Tsangpo valley? Several dams were built along along the Yarlung Tsangpo above the main population of those cypresses. Can you guess what would happen when the river flow will change? Where are the studies on the environmemtal impacts of the dams?
"The characteristics of this tree does not contradict rushforth's description,"
Yes, it does.
"the paper on this species has not been published and it would be irrational to draw conclusions based on descriptions and online photos alone."
This contradicts altogether what you wrote before. And yes, it is possible to id several cypress species on photos only. Obviously you cannot. Especially C.austrotibetica is easy to id for it has a unique foliage.
"It is referred to as C. torulosa in CGTN report, but some Chinese media also refer to it as C. austrotibetica, due to the unprofessionalism of the media and the confusion of the related Chinese designations (西藏柏木,which means Tibetan cypress-C. torulosa,。藏南柏木,which means Southern tibetan cypress-C. austrotibetica), some reports are very confusing."
And you are the one who brings confusion here. Again you are showing that you do not understand taxonomy at all. Once again: taxonomy does not care about common names.
"the taxonomy of the specimen is not clear. Could be Cupressus austrotibetica or another species or variety of the area."
No, it cannot be another species. The taxonomy is very clear, based on herbarium specimens and distribution range and sizes of the cypresses. So far there is no "variety" in the area.
Someone tried to use my pseudo... A new password was sent to me when I did not request one.
Correction:
No, the stands are not the same. The one from the video is on the LEFT bank of the Parlung Tsganpo opposite the road, while the 102.3m tree is on the RIGHT bank of the Yigong Tsangpo.
By the way, it is not any tree, it is a Cypress and I guess some Cypress specialists know what they are talking about.
And the exact locality of this giant Cypress is perfectly known, now.
Perhaps you are right that the record tree should be called C. austrotibetica… in YOUR taxonomy. We must keep in mind that the taxonomy of Asian cypresses is anything but fixed. POWO has adopted your concept, but it does not mean that it would be an established taxonomy. The time will show which taxa and species are accepted by the scientific community. I guess there will be fewer species, some of your taxa perhaps considered as var./ssp.
The Chinese researchers had some reason to call the tree C. rushforthii, perhaps correctly, perhaps incorrectly. At the best you would ask them directly. If you are a serious researcher, you should have channels to contact them. So you would also have possibility to influence their very probably incoming scientific paper.
Another thing is how to behave on Internet forums. I don’t think that it is the best way to push your agenda to come on forums insulting others. It also gives a feeling that one is ultimately an amateur, if he behaves aggressively on a hobbyist forum, as it was the only place to express one’s opinion. You should take lessons from your buddy “Conifers”. He also sometimes has different opinions than me and the others but he is always polite.
Btw, the species of the tallest trees in Borneo is a bit questionable, too. The tallest tree Dial & Mifsud measured in 2008 was identified as Shorea faguetiana by their guide, who was the best available person to identify trees. However, one of the best experts of the Asian rainforests, Peter Ashton, identified it later from the material sent to him as Shorea gibbosa. From the moment, all the tallest trees were dubbed as Shorea faguetiana, although Dial’s work showed that numerous trees can reach similar heights. I guess a reason could be that these trees are called “yellow meranti”, but yellow meranti is actually not a species but a species group including numerous species of relatively similar appearance. (Note: Ashton has grumbled on no Internet forum that the species name is wrong! For him it was enough to write it in his monumental book.)
The opinions above are mine and this is not my website. Perhaps Jeroen has an opinion, too.
Ik herinner me jouw uitspraak over de acer campestre/monspessulanum in de Doelentuin Delft. Ik heb er een item van gemnaakt. Kun en wil je er in meedoen?
Groet
Wim Brinkerink
Wim Brinkerink 13-7-2023
https://agroinformacion.com/auguran-una-produccion-de-cereal-catastrofica-con-una-caida-superior-al-90-en-extremadura/
I was in San Diego in december 2019 and there was no blooming. I asked the son of my partner to keep an eye on it and he sent me pictures of blooming in may 2023. https://www.monumentaltrees.com/nl/usa/californie/sandiegocounty/23113_intersectionof25thstreetenastreet/
I've seen them in Nepal (april 2008) and Bulgarya (august 2016) but for the moment I cannot reproduce my findings at that time. Maybe later.
A second object is the Erythrina caffra in San Diego. At 21-4-2021 it was in full bloom. In decemeber 2019 there was nothing as far as I remember. But I must have seen some blooming at the time, otherwise I couldn't have determinated the tree.
https://www.monumentaltrees.com/nl/fotos/122808/
For the moment a very interesting topic to me. I hope also for others.
Wim
Dit is voor boomkwekers meestal een eenvoudigere en goedkoeren manier om een soort in flinke aantallen te kweken. In Nederland zal zuiver zaad van Fraxinus angustifolia relatief moeilijk verkrijgbaar zijn omdat hier veel meer stuifmeel van F. excelsior rondzweeft. Het zaad aan angustifolia moederbomen zal dus vaak bestoven zijn door stuifmeel van excelsior. Zuiver zaad zal wel te vinden zijn maar het kost tijd en moeite om dit uit te zoeken.
Stekken en enten is dan goedkoper en levert zuivere angustifolia enten op. Vermoedelijk zal men tegenwoordig wel angustifolia 'op eigen wortel' kunnen leveren, want dit wordt de laatste tijd veel meer gestimuleerd in de boomkwekerij en boom-aanplant-wereld.
Western Redcedar '59315':
https://live.staticflickr.com/1220/538414221_9ec0e1c135_b.jpg
Western Redcedar '60598':
https://bigtreesreg.sites.olt.ubc.ca/files/2021/03/495_Cw_Redwood_TW.jpg
Western Redcedar '60595':
https://bigtreesreg.sites.olt.ubc.ca/files/2021/03/526_Cw_Triceratops_Cheewhat_TW_1.jpg
Western Redcedar '59300':
https://ancientforestalliance.org/wp-content/uploads/2023/03/darling-river-cedar-oh-my-darling.jpg
(note: none of the above photos are mine, credit to TJ Watt for all but the first one)
Specimens not on Monumental Trees (yet):
https://ancientforestalliance.org/wp-content/uploads/2023/03/walbran-valley-emerald-giant-cedar-tree.jpg
https://ancientforestalliance.org/wp-content/uploads/2018/10/avatar-grove-lower-burly-tree.jpg
https://ancientforestalliance.org/wp-content/uploads/2023/03/flores-island-giant-spikey-cedar-tree.jpg
Some good photos on MT:
https://www.monumentaltrees.com/en/photos/150995/
https://www.monumentaltrees.com/en/photos/138146/
https://www.monumentaltrees.com/en/photos/4206/
https://www.monumentaltrees.com/en/photos/101489/
These are not just particularly good specimens, most large red cedars look like this. So you can see why I think the western red cedar deserves a spot among the monumental tree species. What do you think?
Update: nevermind, I figured it out! lol
Including a Rowan at 1150m.
A Sitka Spruce at 1125m, which is even more remarkable! I wonder what the highest altitude Sitka is in its native habitat?
https://www.bbc.co.uk/news/uk-scotland-highlands-islands-65903065
The very highest record seems to be a seedling juniper at 1200 m on Ben Macdui, historically reported by Jim Macintosh and cited in the above article.
Sitka Spruce seems the likeliest candidate to make real trees at these altitudes. Alastair Firth found a measurable one at 990 m last year: https://ati.woodlandtrust.org.uk/tree-search/tree?treeid=228000&from=3523&v=2318426&ml=map&z=13&nwLat=56.782399942300714&nwLng=-5.096657409041576&seLat=56.68098254616487&seLng=-4.657204284041576#/.
Never underestimate nature! I always suspected tree species would be capable of growing to over a 1000m in Scotland. I suspect these trees or in this case shrub sized ones are subjected 100mph winds almost annually at 1100m!
In Wales there are forestry plantations at the economic tree line at 700-800m somewhat higher than in Scotland due to lower windspeeds, so in theory trees would grow even higher here if the mountains were taller, so perhaps hypothetically the tree line would be 1200m or so. If we had mountains in south east England of 1800m I suspect the tree line would be 1500m and so fourth as this area as the lowest windspeeds in the UK.
ik ben op zoek naar jouw telefoonnummer -heb het gehad, maar ben het kwijt-. Ik zoek namelijk informatie over een paar bomen bij ons in de gemeente en krijg eigenlijk maar weinig resultaat via heemkunde of andere bronnen. mogelijk dat jij hier iet s over weet of een bron kent die hier iets over kan vertellen. Hier is mijn 06 nummer -0612681338-. Ivm met vleermuisonderzoeken is het het handigst om even te appen, kan niet altijd de telefoon oppakken.
de info heb ik nodig voor een heel leuk project over veterane bomen en het specifieke beheer hiervan en hoe je deze bomen in de toekomst kan behouden.
hartelijke groet,
Rody Wigmans
I thought I would record it for posterity before I mill it, happy to add photos of the trunk and endgrain section, I have counted the rings, the only thing I don't know is the exact location and height but I will try to find this out from the tree surgeon who's driveway the logs were on.
Para que lo sepas : no se pueden subir fotos a MT sin el permiso escrito del que la hizo, por ese motivo no se pone la foto sino el enlace donde está o de donde se ha extraído la información.
More...